Пікірлер
@JungleNation333
@JungleNation333 Күн бұрын
Read Psalm 1
@djaconetta
@djaconetta Күн бұрын
If God is not presented in the new test as one God in three separate persons..Then why is it that when ever God the father , Jesus Christ , or the Spirit are always mentioned in the first person singular . Addressed this way this indicates that they are equal but separate persons. If we are talking about the spirit of god,,it would be in the third person. Also each member of the God head posses the same essence. Sovereignty,Love, eternal life, perfect righteousness perfect justice, omniscience, omniscience, omnipresent , immutability , and veracity .
@lightofthelogos
@lightofthelogos Күн бұрын
1. It's irrelevant because of what the Tanakh and NT teach. They don't teach neo-Platonic Unitarian Oneism. And Sean has still never addressed all of Brant's points in their debate. 2. The Mosaic tile found in Israel dates back to the early 3rd century (circa 230 AD) and calls Jesus God using the nomina sacra. The ICTHUS fish was written everywhere in the early church and is an acronym for "Jesus Christ God Son Savior". Many at minimum believed Jesus was God, which does not comport with neo-Platonic Unitarian Oneism. 3. Unitarianism didn't come about until the 4th century as a reaction to Trinitarian doctrine. It still is primarily a reaction.
@juniormonteiro6323
@juniormonteiro6323 Күн бұрын
Thank you!
@rg54321
@rg54321 2 күн бұрын
Abraham was not just without circumcision. He was circumcised physically eventually. He was just without passover, the sabbath, and other laws, and ... he was just without jesus!
@arthurcantrell1954
@arthurcantrell1954 2 күн бұрын
At very least Jesus would be 1/2 God,a demi God! Jesus is 100% God and 100% Human. Tuggy didn’t win this debate.
@mudasaka9515
@mudasaka9515 2 күн бұрын
This man needs to read the Qur’an, then the truth shall be unveiled to him in no uncertain terms. Jesus said in the Qur’an: Certainly Allah is my Lord and your Lord then worship Him. That’s the straight path.
@juniormonteiro6323
@juniormonteiro6323 3 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@juniormonteiro6323
@juniormonteiro6323 3 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@juniormonteiro6323
@juniormonteiro6323 3 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@ekklesiabible8188
@ekklesiabible8188 3 күн бұрын
Stop Bible Ignorance. Devils use your ignorance to defeat you about the Title of the word “God”. Geneses 1:1 Hebrew Elohim is plural (the title of more than one God).The Bible word God is plural a title is -not the name of God or gods. Best Example Exodus Moses commands Exodus {23:13} And in all things that I have said unto you take you heed: and make no mention of the name of other gods, neither let it be heard out of your mouth. You can speak the title [Position] but don’t speak the name [authority] to give glory and honor to other gods. The Bible word “God’ is capitalized to show a different name of a certain Bible God or Lord from other Titles of other gods that have names
@BruceLyon-z9z
@BruceLyon-z9z 3 күн бұрын
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
@juniormonteiro6323
@juniormonteiro6323 3 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@fredcalledbygod
@fredcalledbygod 4 күн бұрын
I love this man
@jeffreytrinidad3564
@jeffreytrinidad3564 Күн бұрын
●Was Father being a spirit already a Person even before the Incarnation? ●How do you understand the word "Person?"
@juniormonteiro6323
@juniormonteiro6323 4 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@juniormonteiro6323
@juniormonteiro6323 4 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@JeanPamphile
@JeanPamphile 5 күн бұрын
Trinity is nowhere in the Bible.
@JeanPamphile
@JeanPamphile 5 күн бұрын
There is no such thing as Trinity. The Roman Catholic Church created this narrative and made people believe in this nonsense. These pretending scholars and philosophers thrist the Bible verses and make people believe in their philosophy. The Bible is not a book of confusion. The Bible is the words of God. Holy spirit is God himself. the Holy Spirit is not a separate God. Trinity does not exist.
@TheWhyIsThatSo
@TheWhyIsThatSo 5 күн бұрын
The "Lamb" in Revelation is not Jesus . Jesus is the one on the throne in Revelation and the "Lamb" is His "messiah". The "Lamb" is the "messiah of the Lord Jesus" ( Revelation 11:15 ) The "Lamb" is also the "two witnesses" (ONE person) ......"THE ONE who conquers" that Jesus is speaking to . The "Lamb/ two witnesses" is slain and resurrected in chapter 11 . The "Lamb" is "one like a son of man" or a flesh and blood human, and John sees him " as it had been slain" . (Rev. 5:6) Jesus, as the "Spirit of Truth" will be "IN" a flesh and blood human. ( John chapter 16 ) And the "Lamb" is King David , the "Bright Morning Star", as Jesus says in Revelation 22:16 .
@dunk_law
@dunk_law 5 күн бұрын
see Brent Nongbri - Palaeography, Precision and Publicity: Further Thoughts on P.Ryl.iii.457 (P52) Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2020
@stefanm7327
@stefanm7327 5 күн бұрын
21:10 his Spirit is, his incarnation is not. 1 Corinthians 8:6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by Him.
@jeffreytrinidad3564
@jeffreytrinidad3564 Күн бұрын
●Was Father being a spirit already a Person even before the Incarnation? ●How do you understand the word "Person?"
@jeffreytrinidad3564
@jeffreytrinidad3564 Күн бұрын
Based on 1st Corinthians 8:6, you would have 2 Spirits + Body. Father = Spirit + Jesus Christ = Spirit + Body YOUR 1 GOD IS 2 SPIRITS + 1 BODY
@jonathansmith7777
@jonathansmith7777 6 күн бұрын
But angelic hosts don't create. So your analysis is flawed. Using the New Testament we saw God created through / by Jesus
@2wright4
@2wright4 6 күн бұрын
this is 100% wrong... whoever you are , you need to pray for your folly,, I pray that everyone one watching this is touched by the truth of God and His spirit.. you were called to be HOLY not Christian or any other religious name.. As the bible says .. the Jews require a sign and the Greek seek after wisdom... and you are definitely showing it.. human wisdom destroys the meaning of the bible... Jesus, the man prayed to the Holy Father (which is A Spirit, the Spirit)... you are only seeing Jesus as a man and not as God in man... you are misleading your followers with your own understanding... I pray for you to be convicted and corrected...
@kiwihans100
@kiwihans100 6 күн бұрын
using 1 John 5:7 as an example, There are so many examples of 'text tampering' to try and 'prove' the trinity, this fact itself shows it is NOT from God! How many examples can be given where the scribe has changed a word or verse to prove there is no trinity rather than the opposite? Paul said in 2 Cor 4:2; "We have renounced the UNDERHANDED THINGS..". There has been so much fraud, twisting, hiding, e.t.c of ancient texts to try and convay doctrines! Trinitarian examples are many! EXAMPLE; 1 Tim 3:16 " God was manifest in the flesh" should read "He was manifest in the flesh" Just the addition of a small - in a greek lettrer 0 made all the difference! ( exposed by Count Constine Von Tishendorff, who discovered the Siniatic MSS of the NT in 1844) Falsehood exposed!
@kiwihans100
@kiwihans100 6 күн бұрын
All so called 'trinity' claims before Nicea are RETROSPECTIVE! They search for a sentence when a 'church father' may have mentioned the 'Father', the 'Son' & the 'Holy Spirit' together. However NON 'trinitarians' ALSO believe in these three entitiies! The 'trinity' by correct definition MUST say words to the effect that "There are three persons in one God" or "God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit'. Also the fact that mere men have made claims similar to the 'trinity' doersnt prove its true, why not? because their words are NOT part of the Holy bible! and second. there has been much tampering, altering, adding to old documents, many of which date from many centuries AFTER the church fathers lived. Thus there is NO empirical evidence for 'pre Nicea trinity'!
@actwithwisdom777
@actwithwisdom777 7 күн бұрын
Explain please what is the difference between spirit of Christ ( human) and spirit of Father is they are two separated spirit ?
@juniormonteiro6323
@juniormonteiro6323 7 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@pedroespinoza1956
@pedroespinoza1956 8 күн бұрын
En la tora habla de los 3
@pedroespinoza1956
@pedroespinoza1956 8 күн бұрын
Estos sectarios unicitarios saliero de Asambleas de Dios en rebeldia con nuvas herejias
@arthurcantrell1954
@arthurcantrell1954 8 күн бұрын
Jesus is Gods begotten Son at the very least he would be a Demi god. I and the father are one!
@TheRamon333
@TheRamon333 8 күн бұрын
King James Bible 1Chronicles 17:26 And now, LORD, thou art God, and hast promised this goodness unto thy servant
@azote339
@azote339 8 күн бұрын
Early Jewish Christians are much closer to Muslims
@jeffreytrinidad3564
@jeffreytrinidad3564 Күн бұрын
On what basis?
@actwithwisdom777
@actwithwisdom777 8 күн бұрын
What is the difference between spirit of Christ and spirit of Father ? Are they two separated spirits
@johnalexir7634
@johnalexir7634 8 күн бұрын
You have to twist the bible around to get the trinity, just like you have to twist it around to pretend it doesn't condone slavery, you have to twist it around to make an argument for what really happens after death, you have to twist it around to try read Christ into the OT. It's almost like the book doesn't have clear teachings on deeper theological issues.
@actwithwisdom777
@actwithwisdom777 9 күн бұрын
What is the difference between Spirit of God (Father )and spirit of Messiah (Jesus christ Man)
@fredcalledbygod
@fredcalledbygod 9 күн бұрын
Unitarian view “Son of God” instances number: 45 “Son of the Highest” instances number: 1 “Son of the Most High God” instances number: 2 “Son of the Living God” instances number: 2 “Son of the Father” instances number: 1 “Son of the Blessed” instances number: 1 “Begotten Son” instances number: 4 “My Beloved Son” instances number: 7 63 times Jesus is referred to as the Son with explicit phrases. It was difficult to count all instances in which Jesus is referred to as the Son because in some instances, only “the Son” is used and it can be argued that it’s not specific enough. Another example would be parables. There are is a parable within the gospels that alludes to the Father being a “husbands-man” and Jesus “the son”. Another parable which alludes to the Father being a king, preparing a wedding feast for his son. When I included such instances, that both alluded and explicitly referred to Jesus as the Son of God, there was a total of 132 instances referring to the Son. “God is one” instances number: 1 “The Lord is one” instances number: 3 “One God” instances number: 8 “Only God” instances number: 1 “Only true God” instances number: 1 “No other God” instances number: 4 “You are God, You alone” instances number: 2 “You are the Lord God, You alone” instances number: 1 “You alone are the Lord” instances number: 1 “You alone are God” instances number: 1 “You are the Lord, You alone” instances number: 1 “None besides Me/No other God besides Me” instances number: 2 “There is no other” instances number: 11 37 times is God referred to as One Person in its various ways. “God the Father” instances number: 15 15 times is the Father referred to as God. Total amount of instances for the Unitarian view: 184 The deification of Jesus view [Encompasses Binitarianism & Modalism] “God the Son” instances number: 0 “God” instances number(Reference to Jesus): 6 6 times Jesus is referred to as God. “Trinity” instances number: 0 Other equivalent coined terms for trinity instances number: 0 “Three in one” instances number: 0 “One in three” instances number: 0
@fredcalledbygod
@fredcalledbygod 9 күн бұрын
Evidence of Trinitarian Interpolation over the Centuries The Codex Sinaeticus, was first discovered in 1844 at Saint Catherine’s Monastery, at the foot of Mount Sinai. In 1859, more parts were found. It is the oldest, complete manuscript we have of the Old and New Testament, dating back to the mid-fourth century (330-350 AD). In this writing, I will be using the Codex Sinaeticus to compare to later translations of the Scriptures such as the KJV (1611) and NKJV (1982) to reveal the changes Trinitarians have made to the Scriptures to give substantiation to their ontologically non-existent belief. Definitely Corrupted 1 John 5:7-8 [Codex Sinaeticus, 4th Century] "7 For they that testify are three, 8 the Spirit, and the water, and the blood, and the three are one." 1 John 5:7-8 [King James Version, 17th Century] "7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. 8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one." The earliest manuscripts do not contain “The Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost”. This was an addition and it is commonly referred to as the “Comma Johanneum” 1 Timothy 3:16 [Codex Sinaeticus, 4th Century] "And confessedly great is the mystery of godliness: He who was manifested in flesh. was justified in spirit, seen by angels, preached among the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory." 1 Timothy 3:16 [King James Version, 17th Century] "And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory." The original writing says "He who was manifested in the flesh" but one word was subtly changed to give substantiation to the previously non-existent case of the trinity and so "He" was changed to "God", in full, reading "God was manifest in the flesh". Revelation 1:8 [Codex Sinaeticus, 4th Century] "I am the Alpha and the Omega, says the Lord God, who is, and who was, and who comes, the Almighty." Revelation 1:8 [King James Version, 17th Century] "I am the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty." Initially this appears to be a harmless subtraction from "Lord God" to "Lord" but if you're familiar with Bible terminology, you would know that "Lord God" is a title exclusive to God the Father alone while "Lord" is used interchangeably for both God and Jesus. This subtraction is significant because it makes it appear as if Jesus is declaring to be eternal when in fact it is the Father who is speaking. Jesus cannot be eternal since He is the begotten Son of God. You cannot both be eternal and begotten. If He is eternal then He is not begotten and neither can He be God's Son. If He is begotten, then He is not eternal because to be begotten implies there was a time you were not and then you came into existence. Be not surprised by this corruption as Jesus forewarned us in the final chapter of Revelation: Revelation 22:19 "And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book." Colossians 2:2 [Codex Sinaeticus, 4th Century] "that their hearts may be comforted, they being knit together in love, and for all the riches of the full assurance of understanding, for the acknowledgment of the mystery of God," Colossians 2:2 [New King James Version, 20th Century] "that their hearts may be encouraged, being knit together in love, and attaining to all riches of the full assurance of understanding, to the knowledge of the mystery of God, both of the Father and of Christ," Here, they add on an entirely new part to the end: "Both of the Father and of Christ", making two Persons of the Godhead. Titus 2:13 [Codex Sinaeticus, 4th Century] “13 waiting for the blessed hope, and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ” Titus 2:13 [New King James Version, 20th Century] “looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,” The New King James Version conflates the Person of Jesus to be both the great God and Saviour when originally Jesus was rather “the glory of our great God”, emphasis on the glory of. So it’s not that He is the great God but rather the glory of Him. Matthew 24:36 [Codex Sinaeticus, 4th Century] “36 But of that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels of the heavens, nor the Son, but the Father only.” Matthew 24:36 [King James Version, 17th Century] “36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.” The King James Version removes “Nor the Son”.
@kathyern861
@kathyern861 8 күн бұрын
Gee, funny he left out John 1:1
@fredcalledbygod
@fredcalledbygod 8 күн бұрын
@@kathyern861 @ John 1:1 isn’t calling Jesus the Most High God. It’s a metonym to draw at His consubstantiality with God. Furthermore, funny how John 1:1 doesn't have 3 Persons as Trinitarians would like to postulate that there are 3 Gods but rather 2 Persons. Where is this so called third Person in John 1? When you ask trinitarians they resort to saying “Because He’s not the focus of the text”. Seems reasonable at first, until we go to verse 18 and it says the ONLY one who has seen God is the Son. Oh? Where’s the Holy Spirit? I thought He was an eternal third Person with the Father? Do we not know what only means anymore? Only means “solely”, “exclusively”, “no one else besides the said subject”. Further extending upon the previous point, if the Holy Spirit was an eternal Third Person, then Jesus would have two Fathers according to Luke 1:35 as it is said that He was the One who overshadowed Mary and not the Father. Therefore, the Holy Spirit cannot be His own separate eternal Person hence why the Bible calls Him “the Spirit of Your Father” and “The Spirit that proceeds from the Father”. John 4:24 "God is Spirit"
@kathyern861
@kathyern861 8 күн бұрын
@@fredcalledbygod Funny how he didn't include John 1:1 - now he's backpedaling like crazy.
@fredcalledbygod
@fredcalledbygod 9 күн бұрын
Historical Timeline of the numerical personhood of God according to the Old Testament, New Testament, Post-Apostolic Patriarchs - The following dates are an approximation and not exact due to the decay of information over time - The majority of the timeline was made by me until the point of 33 AD where I coincided Hugh H. Stannus’ timeline but still added details Old Testament Patriarchs 31st century BC [3100 BC] - Enoch commonly refers to God as “the Holy Great One”, “The Holy and Great One” and “the Great One” 1 Enoch 10:1, 1 Enoch 14:2, 1 Enoch 25:3, 1 Enoch 92:2 (If you don’t believe 1 Enoch is inspired then feel free to ignore this time point. The aim of this post is to show the transition of beliefs from one God to three Gods) 21st century BC [2100 BC] - Job described God as “the Holy One” indicating his belief in God as a singular person. Job 6:10 “…For I have not concealed the words of the Holy One” 15th century BC [1500 BC] - Moses declares to the children of Israel that the Lord is one. Deuteronomy 6:4 “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one!” 12th century BC [1200 BC] - Hannah, in her prayer to God says there is no other God besides Him. 1 Samuel 2:2 ““No one is holy like the LORD, For there is none besides You, Nor is there any rock like our God” 10th century BC [1000 BC] - David in His prayer recorded in Psalm 86:10 writes: “For You are great, and do wondrous things; You alone are God” and in Psalms 50:1 writes: “the Mighty One, God the Lord” 7th century BC [700 BC] - Hezekiah, in his prayer says “You are God, you alone” and “the One who dwells between the Cherubim” 2 Kings 19:15 “Then Hezekiah prayed before the LORD, and said: “O LORD God of Israel, the One who dwells between the cherubim, You are God, You alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth. You have made heaven and earth.” 6th century BC [600 BC] - Habakkuk in his discourse with God “Are You not from everlasting, O Lord my God, my Holy One?” Habakkuk 1:12 5th century BC [500 BC] - Malachi says unto the people of Israel “Have we not all one Father? Has not one God created us?” Malachi 2:10 It is clear that the pre-flood fathers and the Jewish patriarchs did not know a triune God. New Testament Patriarchs Beginning of Christianity [Monotheistic at its inception] 33 AD - Jesus calls the Father “the only true God” in John 17:3 and says of Himself “I am the Son of God” in John 10:36 57 AD - Paul writes in his first letter to the Corinthians “For unto us, there is one God, the Father” in 1 Corinthians 8:6 63 AD - Peter writes in his first epistle “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ” Post Apostolic Fathers 70-80 AD - Shepherd of Hamas writes “For the Lord sware concerning His Son” 96 AD - Clement of Rome writes “Have we not one God and one Christ?” And “Christ was sent by God” 115 AD - Polycarp in his epistle to the Philippians, Chapter 12: “But may the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, and Jesus Christ Himself, who is the Son of God” Beginning of the Trinity 150 AD - Justin Martyr lays down the groundwork of the trinity of 3 Divine Beings, with the Father being the only true God and the Son and Holy Spirit being subordinate in rank. Calls the Father “the most true God” and Jesus “the Son of the true God… in second place”, of the Holy Spirit “and the prophetic Spirit in the third”. 170 AD - The word “Trias” is used for the first time in Christian literature by Theophilus, Bishop of Antioch 200 AD - The word “Trinitas” is used for the first time in Christian Literature by Tertullian 260 AD - Propounded by Sabellius that there is one God, with three different aspects being the Father, the Son and Holy Spirit 312 AD - Arius opposes trinitarianism and believed that the Son was a created being and God created everything through Him. This is known as Arianism. Christianity officially becomes polytheistic 325 AD - The Council of Nicaea decrees 3 Divine Beings and deifies Christ alongside the Father but is silent on the personhood of the Holy Spirit. Arianism is also declared as heresy. 325-381 AD - Great conflict surrounding the doctrine of the trinity. Arianism continues to persist but Athanasius strongly opposes it. 381 AD - The Council of Constantinople finalises the doctrine of the trinity of three distinct Gods, expanding upon the Nicene creed with more detail in regards to the Holy Spirit 383 AD - Emperor Theodosius threatens to punish all who will not believe in and worship the Trinity
@actwithwisdom777
@actwithwisdom777 10 күн бұрын
Difference between spiri of Christ and spirit of God
@actwithwisdom777
@actwithwisdom777 10 күн бұрын
Difference between spirit of christ and spirit of God
@johnsteindel5273
@johnsteindel5273 10 күн бұрын
Ehad has a wide range of meaning, including 'one' as in a compound unity! As is one bunch of grapes. There is only one God. Yachid could have been used but wasn't. And None of those Jews -the leaders, Pharisees, scribes, or the regular folks who became the Apostles - none of them appeared to understand almost anything about what God's plans were as prophesied in the Old Testament and unfolded in Jesus Christ. So to appeal to their beliefs at that same time about the Trinity is, well, kind of odd. The Trinity is not complicated, it's that the eternal omnipotent omnipresent holy Creator of all God is beyond our tiny mind's reasoning capabilities. We submit our minds to the Word of God which says father, son and Spirit are God and there is One God
@Ken-rb7gq
@Ken-rb7gq 11 күн бұрын
No one.. That Old Covenant is obsolete and has been taken away by the death and resurrection of Christ and the inauguration of the New Covenant.
@earifin
@earifin 11 күн бұрын
Jesus told us in John 20:17, that His God and His disciples's God is His Father. Father also gave His answer through Peter that Jesus is His Son, the meaning of Son of God. who those theologians could give better answer than Jesus and Father Themselves.
@leastidyworld4365
@leastidyworld4365 11 күн бұрын
The problem with the statement that Jesus believed in the Jewish beliefs is that we can then say well then why isn’t Judaism the most true religion, does that mean all Christinas should be Jews because Jesus Christ was a Jew? NO, that is not the case.
@mamajan99
@mamajan99 11 күн бұрын
Is a married man also a woman? Of course not! However, doesn't Genesis 2:24 say "The two shall become one Flesh" while the husband is the only head! They act as a single unit rather than two separate individuals. Likewise, Jesus is claiming that He and God are unified as one. But he goes further saying that even his followers are one with the Son and the Father! Rather than saying that Jesus and God are the same person, Jesus is claiming that He and God are unified as one along with even his followers! "that they all may be one, as you, Father, are in me, and I in you; that they also may be one in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me."Jn 10:30, 17:21 Jesus obviously is implying that they are in "unity" or Unison just as two singers singing the same song joined by a great choir of many others, all singing the same tune in perfect unity, harmoniously joined: Eph 4:16. "When all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected to him who put all things in subjection under him, that God may be all in all"" 1 Cor "15:28
@mamajan99
@mamajan99 11 күн бұрын
Jesus, face down in the dirt, begged his Father to "Remove this cup" then added "But not my will but yours." Jesus is not God Almighty. Do not ignore Jesus when he said 'I am going to MY Father and YOUR Father, to MY God and YOUR God. Jn 20:17 Like the Samaritans, Trinitarians worship what they do not know.John 4:22 Isaiah said: "Their worship of me is based on merely human rules they have been taught." Isa 29:13
@AlanHales-k6i
@AlanHales-k6i 11 күн бұрын
How to become a "SIR" Twist the Bible and the Biblical Hebrew and Greek and willfully refuse to believe the Bible.Just like Anthony Buzzard does.
@Swordoftruth289
@Swordoftruth289 11 күн бұрын
Yeah, once I heard "not believing in the trinity," it means you deny jesus." I'm not kidding. I was scared and had a bit of ptsd in a way from believing, then I realized how guilty I felt for telling other people that.
@calebbrunson7120
@calebbrunson7120 12 күн бұрын
Not just Calvin killing Servetus, but the whole Roman Catholic church had a long history of murdering “heretics”
@pauljbroussard1690
@pauljbroussard1690 12 күн бұрын
Jesus is God's name