I hear you.. everyone needs a conscious mother like you. And it's never embarrassing, maybe it's even someone's dream....

And the values on the merge that comes after all the course/fine nobs don't show the right values that I've set on the nobs,I don't know if that gives you an idea as to what my issue is

Is the manual setup properly routed to the sampler. There might be something missing from the connection. Anyway, I plan to resume this series soon. I've been on a crunch to finish an album, so I stopped making videos. I plan to show a few different methods as well. because thy all have their pros and cons. I have had many times where something goes wrong in these setups, or I find a better way, and then rebuild it. Anyway, best of luck with it. I will resume this series this winter.

I haven't been making youtube videos lately, because I'm trying to finish an album. Once it's done, I plan to get back into the tutorials. I I would like to get it going again this Winter. Thanks.

Off the top of my head, choose the PWM waveform and use the Position control to go through the Wave.

The section called "sample length" (I labeled it at 48:44 seconds) is where the sample length is input. I set that with the "coarse" and "fine" knob, whenever entering in a new sample. I have the sample divided into 32 segments that each has 64 slices. I'll get to setting that up in one of the following videos. If you did want to have a knob to change between different sample lengths (for example, if you want to use a multisample with various clips, determined by the Select knob), then you could have a knob going into a merge (set to nearest), connected to a modulator, that is assigned to the coarse and fine knobs of the main sample length. That way you could set up several snapshots of different sample lengths. Then you could have the knob that controls that merge, also control the select knob. That is not how I set mine up, because I like to be able to see all my segments on 1 clip, and not have to open the multisample editor. But either way would work. I could show a method for doing that in one of the following videos.

@@AndreiOlenev-k2v thanks! I just now realized the value readout there is the length of the sample :) works perfectly when I set it

Hi, it sounds like "loop start" and "play start" on the sampler aren't assigned correctly. In this video, I show how to assign those to the keyboard at around. 35 minutes in. That is for beat division slicing. I start showing manual slicing in the next video.

Thanks a lot. I'll be probably covering a couple other methods for getting manual slicing to work in the next video. Especially, since there was an issue that came up at the end with the timing. I might just switch the main playing slice to be receiving directly from the outer patch, instead of from the scanned values. Sometimes that method can cause problems. But, I find it to generally be a useful technique. It just requires a bit of troubleshooting. Either way, I hope that people will find it useful to see the troubleshooting process that goes with experimenting with different methods. If I put it at 2.4 khz, that might have been on accident. In my patch, I either had it running at 24k or 32k. It doesn't really matter. It just needs to be fast. Anyway, I will probably record the next video this weekend.

If you mean, something like rewire, Bitwig doesn't support it. You could send an audio stream directly to Ableton by creating a virtual bus. On WIndows, there are 3rd party programs that can set that up, like VB cable (which is free). On Mac, you can create a virtual device in "audio midi settings"

I've been really wanting to. I need to learn c++ though.

@@AndreiOlenev i was about to say the same thing man, you are a magician. Just hire someone for the coding or just sell in a good vst idè to someone that can code and make it together

I didn't notice that. The setup in this video is a little different than what I used. The split modules that send to the mix on the parseq8 modules, might be out of sync. One thing you could do, is instead of using the split module, you could make a logic setup, where you run off the signal that is controlling each of the parseq's phase modulation, and say that "if that signal is equal or greater to 0, and less than one", than plug those into the modulators that control the mix. That way, the mix will be exactly tied to the phase of each modulator. Anyway, I saved the project in the video, so When I follow it up, I'll troubleshoot issues that might have happened in the first one. But, off the top of my head, the only thing I can think of is that the split module is out of sync with the rest. So, for now, that logic setup would fix it. Thanks for letting me know.

Also, in case, my description of that logic setup is confusing. Take the individual signals that are going into each of the modulators that control the phase of the parseq8s. There will be 3 separate logic setups for each. The setup looks like this: The signal runs into the top input of a "greater or equal to" module, with a constant of 0 plugged into the bottom input. Then also plug the signal into the top input of a "less than" module, and plug a 1 into the bottom input. Then plug both of those logic modules into an "and" module. Then, connect that to the modulator that controls the mix of that parseq8. Repeat for the other 2.

@@AndreiOlenev-k2v thanks for your response and explanation. I was able to get it flowing correctly but had to use a less than or equal rather then just "less than" connected to the 1 constant. for all 3 of them and for the 2nd and 3rd one, had to use a greater than 0 rather than great or equal to 0. looking forward to your next video on this, cheers!

@@krysticsage Cool. Glad it worked out. I'll look into what went wrong with the split module. I probably should have tested everything before ending the video. But, issues like that arise all the time, so I'm hoping in these videos that if people see the process of things like this going wrong, and troubleshooting them, that it can be helpful.

@@AndreiOlenev It was helpful for sure!