I find it strange (ab)^2 to a^2 b^2 is considered "simplifying" when its like the same., written longer even.

⭐🌈☀️

🪐🌟

that is a really paradox because we assume the light ray come out at any angle from the light source, which means that it have to fullfill the second panel because the amount of light ray is cover all angle from the light source

You know i've actually wondered this because i^4=1 so the 4th root of 1 must be i and the sequence the 4th root of 1 is 1 so is i=1?🤔

Very clear thank you!

Everything makes sense here except for the fact that there is no demonstrable real-life evidence to support that the theory of gravity even exists beyond mathematic equations using the inverse law. I would weigh less at the equator than at the North Pole according to the theory of gravity, right? If this were actually true, wouldn’t everyone want to weigh their gold at the North Pole and then sell it according to that weight? The theory of gravity is therefore not true in real life and consistently fails in real world observations. The inverse square law still works for light and sound observations in real life. Please stop promoting Newton’s nonsense.

7:34 this literally helped me so much. I was so panicked and no other video was helping and you really saved my life , thank you !!!!

10 years later and still amazing

Very very good broo

4:30 Nooow you tell me.

Imagine missing, or not understanding this concept(how to use reciprocals), and trying to stack the rest of your public education in math on top of this incomplete foundation. Well, it crumbles. I barely made it through High School. I am 25, and I am finally going back through the basics. I had no idea.

Wow in 2009 I was in 3 years of my life and my bro born in the 2009 … ! That is very creazy and now I study from this video 😮

I know in practice is not useful, but does this mean that when you are doing a limit of the divsion of two polynomials and there is the same numerator and denominator, you can still apply hopital even though is not indetermination? I repeat, I know this is not practical since the straight away answer would be one, I am just saying that Hopital could be applied too. I say this beacause what you explained in the video happens will always happen as long as the functions cross paths

Can there be a problem where the remainder is not a quadratic, if so, what do you do instead of factoring to find the remaining x.

GREAT VIDEO IT HELPED ME A LOT

Great video, here again watching after 6 years

First comment in 3 years

at 10 secs, the graph seems to be non differentiable, so hope velocity is indeterminate

will the area function always start from the origin

Still relevant

Thank you so much, you've made so clear to me. I truly appreciate it

Incredible

You, sir, have a lovely channel organization.

🎉

With all respect sir I did not understand this lecture as things were mixed up though I know diff is the opp of interg

For a video almost as old as me, this was pretty easy to understand. Thanks!!

Gonzalez George Davis George Garcia Mary

I'm so lucky I stumbled upon your channel. Nothing, (and I mean nothing) was clicking until I watched your videos. You have a gift, Derek.

Great explanation sir

Thank you so much ❤❤

very nice

Derek Owens is a top-notch instructor

It does not make sense

you deserve more attention this is the best man

Thank you ❤

hey man, do you still read comments?

I'm seeing this the other way around. energy level is higher the closer it gets to nucleus it's caused by how it's interacting with each other

thank you

This helped me so much 😅 Wasnt understanding anything in Honors Algebra 2 but this helped me understand! Thank you so much!!

Thank you, this was very helpful 💯

erm wattesigma

How does this tie in with indicators in chemistry?

Thank u

Bravooo!

Very cool stuff even in 2024. Your explanation was FRICTIONLESS, to say the least!

I did it a bit differently. I started by finding the time for half at peak height and then multiplied that by two to use for the horizontal distance and got 49m. Then, I worked out the peak height which I got as 12.3 m. Should we always approach these questions starting the way u did and working out the time for the distance asked?

Bernoullis principle does not state that as the velocity of a gas Increases the pressure decreases. Rather the pressure decreases perpendicular to flow and opposite to flow, but Increases in the direction of flow, ending up with the same net pressure energy. You have use this caviot that bernoulli included in his principle.

The difference is pressure doesn't cause a force. Rather the difference is pressure is a force. You don't cause a pressure difference and get lift. A pressure difference is lift. Also, the airfoil shape does not cause a lift force. The shape causes efficient use of the force, but is not it's cause. Further, the most efficient shape changes with airspeed. A shape that is more efficient at one speed is less efficient at a different speed. To get a lift force upward, you accelerate air downward.

How tf yall know which laws to use bruh