Yup! The west is now relatively developed with good infrastructure and standard of life!

Women in the west have claimed their freedom, which means they were not treated any kind of freedom to begin with.

They can be free no problem but like every living being they need guidance, just like men need, without guidance and proper morals being free doesn't help you. Instead you will feel betrayed and lonely.

But in Hinduism what I am heard "Gotra" is still important and people can't marry with same "Gotra".

​@@Lol-s6v6l In Hinduism, it is believed that we have originated from 7 rishis or sages (Saptrishi) who were created by Lord Brahma. The Gotra are the names of those 7 Rishis, so marrying a person of the same gotra would technically be marrying your sibling.

@@GhostRiley_141 Ok. But suppose a girl of certain "Gotra" marry another gotra, then the girl and her childern will attributed to the Husbands "Gotra", now if this goes for eons wouldn't the "Gotra" become something else while it's genetic configaration be something else. Also what about the "Gotra" of any non-Indian. Like suppose if some foreigner become Hindu what will be his/her "Gotra". Also in Hinduism as much I know "Kula" or "Clan" is very important. Like people from nobel "Kula" aren't allowed to marry not so noble "Kula".

@@GhostRiley_141 In my religion Buddhism, things aren't this difficult. If u fall in love, just marry.

Maybe or Maybe not

Are you sure?

@dukejoseph8694 yes

Reform Judaism is a legitimate expression of Jewish identity that emphasizes values like justice, inclusion, and ethical living, all of which are core to Judaism. Disagreeing with its approach is fine, but saying it's 'not Judaism' denies the rich diversity within the Jewish tradition. Of course, it is debatable and dilutes the belief, but the people still consider them selves as Jews.

@ oh yes they are Jews that’s not what i meant! Like Reform Judaism leglects mitzvahs and dilutes Judaism hence is not following it and cherry picks Judaism

Well, that's right, but these days, once LOVE strikes, we tend to find loopholes to justify it. It's better to say "Shouldn't" instead of "Can't."

@@Beyonddoctrine4K In other words, Abrahamic faiths don't allow marriage outside religion but Eastern faiths or "Dharmic" faiths allow marriage between different religions.

​@@Beyonddoctrine4K Can you make part 2

In Buddhism, the culture of tattoos is pretty intense. Ever heard of "Ulki". Try to know about that

Good point! Early Hinduism didn’t directly address interfaith marriage since other organized religions didn’t exist in the same way back then. However, cultural practices like marrying within one’s community or caste evolved over time. Today, many Hindus see these topics differently, and yes, it gets highly debatable.

​@@Beyonddoctrine4KYou should mention both things what religious books of us says and what society says..As per our religious books it didn't mentioned abt other religions but it do mentioned people character...

Myanmar? What Buddhist people did with rohingyas?

@BilalKhan-cq6mn What they did was and is a result of what Rohingays did and they themselves are responsible. If you don't respect values of "Dhamma" and endulge into hooliganism then we Buddhists have no choice. It's simple Give respect, take respect. You are forgetting "Tit for tat" is our ideology.

You are talking about one country with buddhists right. But bro think about rest of the countries who are engaged in endless wars and terrorist activities, Are they buddhist. As most of my muslim friends say, religion is perfect but not people. So if u don't know in buddhism, even thinking of killing or hating enemies is considered as a sin. And to be more accurate, a real buddhist doesn't have any enemy his only enemy is his own mind when it is filled with negativethoughts. And the other thing is just a week ago, a group of miyanmmar refugees came to our country. And the people who rescued them and gave them foods and medicines were buddhists and hindus. I think Myanmar rebels who are fighting against their own government are also buddhists. And Myanmar is not the only country with this kind of situation. I heard that hindus are also fleeing from Bangladesh to Myanmar. So in any country there are good and bad people. Every person who was born as buddhist may not be peaceful. But buddhism is peaceful. This person is saying that he is proud of being a buddhist, because in buddhism marrying from another religion is not prohibitted. So he is proud of buddhism. Anyone can be proud of their religion. I normally do not reply to this kind of comments, but today i had some free time. May god (whoever u believe) bless u.​@BilalKhan-cq6mn

No She isn't mentioned directly. Some people just try to relate her mythological story to some parts of religious books.

Muslim men are allowed to marry jewish women but conversion is expected.Muslim women are to marry within the faith.

The common points raised by Muslim scholars about are : Body modification, Health Conern ( especially old times), cleanliness for prayer (includes wudu part) , Imitating Non-Belivers and Hadith Evidence (the curse on Tattoo practitioners) . But you're also right most concepts are ambiguous these days especially on the older concepts.

Not only "Islam" but tattoo is pretty much forbidden in every "Abrahamic" faith. However, in Islam some modern scholars say if tattoo is temporary it's not forbidden but if it's permanent it's a no-no. But drawing an animal or face that might imitate Allah's creation it's forbidden. So we can say tattoo is "Makrooh".

Yes that's correct🥰, that's why we explicitly mentioned it as a temporary option.

oh so why in hinduism did ram behea-ded a guy for being from lower caste of hinduism? does that not affect sentients of other beings? Ramayana of Valmiki, Uttara Kanda 7, Chapter 75-76:" ”O Rama, I was born of a Shudra alliance and I am performing this rigorous penance in order to acquire the status of a God in this body. I am not telling a lie, O Rama, I wish to attain the Celestial Region. Know that I am a Shudra and my name is Shambuka.” As he was yet speaking, Rama, drawing his brilliant and stainless sword from its scabbard, cut off his he-ad. The Shudra being slain, all the Gods and their leaders with Agni’s followers, cried out, ”Well done! Well done!” overwhelming Rama with praise, and a rain of celestial flowers of divine fragrance fell on all sides, scattered by Vayu.” doesn't look so peaceful...

@@NotiBoii-c6l So, first I'd like to point out that in Hinduism itself, there are certain controversies around texts, this being a large one. However, for me, the largest reason why Rama killed him was because Shambuka was trying to get a boon to conquer heaven and rule over the gods. Also, when Rama did chop his head off, he attained moksha (salvation), so it is not as though he was condemned to anything after. Just as a final remark though, I do not agree with all Hindu texts (and even some Hindu texts contradict others), as there are no definitive texts, so there is a lot of room for discourse and discrepancy.

@@NotiBoii-c6l Simple answer. "Uttara Kanda" never a part of Ramayana but a later addition. If you read actual scripture you may find very poor Sanskrit filled with mistakes in that part compared to previous parts which are more well written. Also in "uttar Kand" there are plently of mistakes and plotholes proving it was never wriiten by original author. Also the word "Uttar-Kand" means aftermath, which signifies what happens after the epic war and Sri Ram returned to Ayoddha. So it was definately a different author who had some other agenda

@@NotiBoii-c6l Instead there are proves that Sri Ram was not only tolerant but view everyone equally. In "Aranya Kand" Sri Ram embraced Nishad Raj and even ate food at his home, and it was treated normally. So why the same person will do that, it doesn't make sense. "Shambhuka" never exists

@@NotiBoii-c6l Simple answer. It's never a part of original Ramayana.

Thanks for your comment! Henna (mehndi) has been used in various cultures for centuries, including Indian traditions. However, it is also deeply rooted in Islamic culture and is widely used by Muslims around the world, especially for occasions like Eid and weddings.

be more specific, the modern day india didnt existed at that time, it was indus(sindh/hindh) valley that invented mehndi and it is now located in pakistan

@@NotiBoii-c6l "Mehendi" was never invented in Indus valley civilization but was invented and culturally used by Persian merchants and farmers. So again wrong.

@@Lol-s6v6l the people who built indus valley civilization came from persia to river indus, this is why the oldest indus valley site mehrgarh is in persian region of sistan

Exactly, but these days people also have adopted their own way of understanding.