honestly the dharmic religions pretty much don't care about anything you do, as long as it doesn't affect other sentient beings
@NotiBoii-c6lАй бұрын
oh so why in hinduism did ram behea-ded a guy for being from lower caste of hinduism? does that not affect sentients of other beings? Ramayana of Valmiki, Uttara Kanda 7, Chapter 75-76:" ”O Rama, I was born of a Shudra alliance and I am performing this rigorous penance in order to acquire the status of a God in this body. I am not telling a lie, O Rama, I wish to attain the Celestial Region. Know that I am a Shudra and my name is Shambuka.” As he was yet speaking, Rama, drawing his brilliant and stainless sword from its scabbard, cut off his he-ad. The Shudra being slain, all the Gods and their leaders with Agni’s followers, cried out, ”Well done! Well done!” overwhelming Rama with praise, and a rain of celestial flowers of divine fragrance fell on all sides, scattered by Vayu.” doesn't look so peaceful...
@8o882Ай бұрын
@@NotiBoii-c6l So, first I'd like to point out that in Hinduism itself, there are certain controversies around texts, this being a large one. However, for me, the largest reason why Rama killed him was because Shambuka was trying to get a boon to conquer heaven and rule over the gods. Also, when Rama did chop his head off, he attained moksha (salvation), so it is not as though he was condemned to anything after. Just as a final remark though, I do not agree with all Hindu texts (and even some Hindu texts contradict others), as there are no definitive texts, so there is a lot of room for discourse and discrepancy.
@Lol-s6v6lАй бұрын
@@NotiBoii-c6l Simple answer. "Uttara Kanda" never a part of Ramayana but a later addition. If you read actual scripture you may find very poor Sanskrit filled with mistakes in that part compared to previous parts which are more well written. Also in "uttar Kand" there are plently of mistakes and plotholes proving it was never wriiten by original author. Also the word "Uttar-Kand" means aftermath, which signifies what happens after the epic war and Sri Ram returned to Ayoddha. So it was definately a different author who had some other agenda
@Lol-s6v6lАй бұрын
@@NotiBoii-c6l Instead there are proves that Sri Ram was not only tolerant but view everyone equally. In "Aranya Kand" Sri Ram embraced Nishad Raj and even ate food at his home, and it was treated normally. So why the same person will do that, it doesn't make sense. "Shambhuka" never exists
@Lol-s6v6lАй бұрын
@@NotiBoii-c6l Simple answer. It's never a part of original Ramayana.
@khatritabrezАй бұрын
Heena(mehendi) is not a tattoo. Mehendi is made of natural substances which does not affect the skin and it starts fading after a month. Mehendi is allowed only for Ladies at special occasions like Eid and Wedding celebrations.❤
@Beyonddoctrine4KАй бұрын
Yes that's correct🥰, that's why we explicitly mentioned it as a temporary option.
@PacifistJACKАй бұрын
The Temporary design that you showed in muslim part is Called Mehndi originally from India.
@Beyonddoctrine4KАй бұрын
Thanks for your comment! Henna (mehndi) has been used in various cultures for centuries, including Indian traditions. However, it is also deeply rooted in Islamic culture and is widely used by Muslims around the world, especially for occasions like Eid and weddings.
@NotiBoii-c6lАй бұрын
be more specific, the modern day india didnt existed at that time, it was indus(sindh/hindh) valley that invented mehndi and it is now located in pakistan
@Lol-s6v6lАй бұрын
@@NotiBoii-c6l "Mehendi" was never invented in Indus valley civilization but was invented and culturally used by Persian merchants and farmers. So again wrong.
@NotiBoii-c6lАй бұрын
@@Lol-s6v6l the people who built indus valley civilization came from persia to river indus, this is why the oldest indus valley site mehrgarh is in persian region of sistan
@imaXenoXАй бұрын
@@NotiBoii-c6l India predates Pakistan our Nation was known as Bharatvarsha a Indian name when 5000 years ago Bharata tribe won Dashrajnya War they named this subcontinent Bharat and we are Bharatiya
@meafordhaunt9 күн бұрын
All things in religion depend on the person. This person thinks this is good, this is bad. That is why people DON'T NEED religion. They just think they do.
@Wellserved251Ай бұрын
The judaism is kinda intense
@PinnutinthАй бұрын
Misconception about tattoo in Islam. It is indeed forbidden. But if one gets tattoos, they should repent but wudhu’ (ablution) is fine even with tattoos because tattoo ink is under the skin specifically the dermis layer. It is forbidden because the Prophet says so and it imitates the unbeliever not because ablution water cant penetrate the skin
@Beyonddoctrine4KАй бұрын
The common points raised by Muslim scholars about are : Body modification, Health Conern ( especially old times), cleanliness for prayer (includes wudu part) , Imitating Non-Belivers and Hadith Evidence (the curse on Tattoo practitioners) . But you're also right most concepts are ambiguous these days especially on the older concepts.
@Lol-s6v6lАй бұрын
Not only "Islam" but tattoo is pretty much forbidden in every "Abrahamic" faith. However, in Islam some modern scholars say if tattoo is temporary it's not forbidden but if it's permanent it's a no-no. But drawing an animal or face that might imitate Allah's creation it's forbidden. So we can say tattoo is "Makrooh".
@Qwertyi69750Ай бұрын
Buddhism is the best one
@Lol-s6v6lАй бұрын
In Buddhism, the culture of tattoos is pretty intense. Ever heard of "Ulki". Try to know about that