He wrote some book that discharged people from medieval churches that diagnosed you with schizophrenia? They would trick you into going into them. Philosophy abstraction itself was a currency for 500 years, well more than that. They controls everything made a totalitarian government before they were even protocoled to so.

For gadamer analytic philosophy is a methodological approach at justifying schizophrenia through esoteric terms from Oxford developed a priori. It is a methodological approach and not actual truth value They have a get your own, like heidegger the great. Its narcissism philosophy total nonsense of psychotic inversion. A neo kantian approach to phenomology. Junk.

Dr. Hannula was a spectacular guest! Definitely feel her passion!

Excellent topic and conversation!!!

I have a question for your speaker, if I may: a) Is there room for any ethics under Dilthey's hermeneutics? b) Ethics over and above one's spatiotemporality? My thanks to your speaker for finding the time to have this discussion.

Thank you for this. I appreciate this discussion because Dilthey is one of those figures like Schelling who weigh heavily in Lukacs Destruction of Reason but who are rarely represented in themselves

I think that after Gadamer, one should add Paul Ricoeur as #5 in the sequence of the central hermeneutic theorists. Engaging with precisely this very genealogy of thinkers, he tried to expand the project beyond understanding the intention (of an authorial subject) towards understanding texts on their own merits. I'm trying to get into this whole set of problems (as a historian who likes philosophy), but I just can't find the time =_=

Hyvä Suomi! 😉❤️

Very nice, this is some of the first media in English dealing with Dilthey on KZbin.

Amazing episode

Rilke is not german or modern, he is just Rilke, one of the greatest over the centuries and the bounderies. .

very instructive and constructive - thank you

Английский язык не предназначен для философии. 😂

"Kerygma and Myth" was among my very favorite books in college (1971-72).😊

Bultmann is so important in thinking about biblical texts. It's very important to think about Bultmann's work which has given me a lot of inspiration but few people talk about him. It's hard to think productively about gospel documents without this approach. To my mind his approach influences me greatly in my New Testament reading.

I am very exited to see this episode!

I love Schelling - thank you for this!

Thank you!

So sad Kant has become so irrelevant!😢

Thank you so much, nice video !!!

Very good stuff

Great episode, thank you both! I think it's an important era to understand. Something I'm interested in are the offbeat intellectual salons that Caroline and I believe the Schlegels, attended in the years prior to gathering in Jena. I don't rember where I learned that a lot of Romantic era thinking has Rosecrucian roots, especially things that lead to expansion of consciousness and idealization of freedom. 'social alchemists'

Brilliant!

I'm trying to find out who his son, Immanuel married and if they had children. My grandmother was Catherine Anna Fichte .

great discussion

Great video! Discussion of Rheinhold's principal of unity at 17:00 really made something click wrt Hegel's criticism of the law in the Understanding chapter of the Phenomenology - I guess it was that kind of law or principle of unity that he had in mind when he said that, moving on to a higher law we get a law that is also emptier.

Sounds like a Rock group tragedy. Must go with the territory of the talented. PS: May I recommend Segius Bulgakov's: The Tagedy of Philosophy. Many thanks to you both, this was Fantastisch!!

As knowlegeble as he is humble and kind. I feel greatly honourd to recently have met with Dr Moran i Copenhagen.

At 55 mins...I just kept thinking of Dr Ian Milgichrist's analysis of right brain thinking...as ranging widely compared to left brain function which is to grasp and eventually, if not balanced by the right brain, becomes dogmatic and self destructive, as shown by our contemporary loss of meaningful dialogue. Your guests descriptions at this point all point to the ability of this generation of romantics to show us the value of this unfettered mindset...always seeking, and ever happy in paradox Beauriful, thank you.

10:29 Whats the title of the book??

I learned so much about Schlegel and Hardenberg! I really liked Dr. Brown's definition of fragments at 24:40 as a medium of thinking where when put together by multiple thinkers the fragments have a "punctual determination". And I continue to love how this channel brings German Idealism to life, all of your guests are contagiously passionate with their wonderful storytelling skills, bringing together a lot of characters and complex ideas. Thank you for all the work you do in your production #MediumIsTheMessage

They were artist-philosophers and philosopher-artists. I guess this still exists, just not in academic philosophy. Many writers have a philosophical background, perhaps in Germany a bit more than elsewhere. The Romantic period took art very seriously, indeed; our own period, not so much. It's just a vast industry.

Amazing episode

Gilles Grelet's Anti-phenomenology is also interesting as a late fruit of Husserl's thought

What’s the difference between an aphorism and a maxim?

always a bit of Eastern philosophy in the tradition of German idealism ... in many ways the history of western philos is the dissolution of metaphysics into an eastern acceptance of existence, into the nothing, but finding and rebuilding meaning there; and in Heidegger's case, from ontology

Unfortunately, Husserl's philosophy is like Hegel's in that you have to go through the myriad detailed arguments/ descriptions for which there is no substitute but to laboriously go through them in their original, even the 400 page shorter Logical Investigations is a pale impression of the massive 2000 odd page original. To read Husserl's " main" works one has to go through about 6000 pages of hard philosophy

Just beginning my study of Arendt. This was very helpful! Thanks for posting this video.

Very concise and informative. Thanks for posting.

Thank you for this, Christopher. I benefited a lot from Dermot Moran's work throughout the years. His writings on Husserl are rigorous and accessible. It was very nice to see you two in conversation.

Wonderful talk, best intro I've ever heard to Husserl. He's a hugely important transitional figure in the history of philosophy/psychology, but one that is somewhat poorly understood I feel, probably because of the complex depth of his thinking, and also his scientific orientation. From Dr. Moran's talk, it's understood he's somewhere in the realm of a scientific/psych/philos thinker. He def posed a lot of inquiries that have yet to be fully realized, in a way very similar to the thinking on the unconscious proposed by Freud and Jung, etc. We opened a lot of doors in the 20th century, but the perplexing nature of the considerations involved for experiences, sense, memory, consciousness, life, etc. will have us puzzling for many centuries, and so it goes. Awesome talk! Thank you so much.

this is great! please have him return to speak on Meinong! ❤