🤤 Promo sm

Hi there , Hope you are well,I saw your channel,all of well ,But There are some problem with your KZbin channel.As a result views, likes and subscribers are not increasing,Do you want to know about your channel problem?

Thhank You Vhanal Thank You T.v Chanal❤

Wood pellets create far more C02 than coal and aren't nearly as efficient, and trees cannot be replaced as fast as they are being burnt. Modern HELE coal-fired plants make more sense, or gas, but nuclear is the highest density form of energy on the planet and does not produce any C02 emissions, even if C02 was a problem.

☝️ p͎r͎o͎m͎o͎s͎m͎

There’s so much government could do to help out with this situation. Fir example, in Germany, everyone is allowed a solar panel than can be plugged in. Also, planning permission is required for any heat pumps greater than 0.6m3, which rules out most pumps >10kWh which are required for larger houses, etc, etc.

In my opinion brushed over way to quickly: We curtail TWhrs of electricity, currently worth ~£1b, meaning we chose not to deliver this energy on grounds of not being able to transport the energy long distance. But right around those switched off wind farms are households dotted, which cannot afford energy and are sitting in the dark, have no electricity to cook a meal or heat the house. I read somewhere that this curtailed energy amounts to more than the annual Welsh consumption, yet lately reliable figures seem to have become scarce. This curtailed energy, in specific it's recent value inflation of several times, drives consumer prices up further. The more we curtail, the less affordable energy becomes and here we create a self propelling loop. This is not a technical issue but a systemic issue. The means to take in at least notable parts of this energy do already exist and would just need to be used. But for example to offer excess energy in an affordable way to consumers during 4-7pm would be ruinous to energy suppliers because of pricing structures incurring major costs, based on annual average data, being nearly two years old. Here in the interest of not having some consumers benefiting from the local resources, which admittedly are not exactly well distributed, we simply make everyone to suffer. Yes, local pricing is as potentially problematic as it is potentially introducing an urge to want to benefit from local resources as well and therefore encouraging uptake. But we have some form of local pricing already anyway, looking at the different regions. Should we not match in specific vulnerable people with available energy? But instead we rather systematically prohibit such undertakings to maximise profits. Is it not even cynic to have people sitting in the dark and cold during windy nights whilst just being miles away from wind turbines being switched off? Worse, this lost energy is at a later point compensated for with traditional generation at cost. Consumers pay this energy not once but twice. And even worse, those people sitting in the dark and cold are extremely likely to have electric heating systems, whose prohibitive costs to run have caused their vulnerability, or at least amplified it, in the first place. Falkirk's Forgotten Villages are just an example, similar households are strewn all over the UK. Is it not a systemic failure to encourage artificial shortages? Is it not unethical, even borderline criminal, when generators withdraw generation just to be able to offer this generation to much higher prices for stabilisation? But has this not been provoked by signalling that there are almost no limits to prices anymore by someone who is supposed to regulate? Here I would also want to point out that motion after motion to mitigate the disparity in energy costs for gas-off-grid households does just fall through the cracks of the government. Try a Google search on 'mp injustice off-gas-grid'. But the persistent inaction (and its consequences) had indeed been pointed out by some speakers. Should there not be a discussion on who actually has the authority and can be tasked reliably with leading us out of this? Yes, only a distributed approach with all hands on can bring us rapidly forward. But certainly we should have heard of Krylov’s fable “Swan, Pike & Crawfish” or any a little more politically correct equivalent?

𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓶 😞

Very interesting

Where is the largest end use sector (transport) represented in this?