@@MartinGraeff hello and sorry to hear you are having trouble. I’m working on new more detailed video about this. I should be releasing either today or tomorrow. Stay tuned and I will hope the next video will help you sort this issue. Thank you for the comment

@@RobAirepicflights Thanks man. It is dissapointing because we are anxious to see this new AI planes in our sim so eagerly. Hope it will work out then.

@ I promise doing my best on this upcoming video 👍👍👍

@@YOWValley hello. Can I ask you, are you trying to set this up for Fenix A320?

@@YOWValley no worries 🙃 Glad you did. Thank you for reaching out

@@nez3009 hello and thank you for the comment. I am thinking of these type of videos as well. I first need to verify and make sure steps provided would be correct, but believe me, I’d like to help as many people as possible. Honestly speaking, Asobo made it unnecessarily complex in msfs2024. Could have been done better and easier

@@RobAirepicflights I made a typo. I meant to say I had no trouble making it work for the Airbus planes. I didn't have to do all this. I plugged it in and worked great with the Fly-By-Wire and iniBuilds. The detents can all be setup in the sim too. I don't have the Fenix so I can't speak to that. The trouble I'm having is with the throttle curves on most other aircraft. When I move them to idle, they go strait to reverse thrust on the Boeings and turboprops. I'm glad that you made a short video showing people this. I'm so tired of people who just want to show everyone a vid of them flying so they spend 2 mins giving poor instructions on setting up the controller and and an hour of them flying lol. Anyway, that setting in the ini file doesn't work for all airplanes and it won't persist. I'm thinking it's going to be a sensitivity setting in the sim.

@@nez3009 hello and thank you for your comment. Very well explained and I very much appreciate the support. That ini file may not be needed anymore to mess with as Asobo since provided 2 patches. I believe they also fixed that issue and I made the video before that to help people out. Now anyone can reverse it back if needed but it appears it did help many people especially when it comes to Fenix. Anyhow I appreciate your feedback and support. Sensitivity is something what’s clunky and I also personally adjusted rudder sensitivity by lot to be able to properly use rudder. Because by default, it’s nightmare

@@aguyfromZRH thank you for your comment. Much appreciated 🙏

@@KevinMick hello. That’s good question. I believe you do because it includes liveries and variations as far as I am aware

Hello, thank you for the comment. I will start with Traffic controller. It indeed does have the option. It shows up during starting of the program, when that title shows up on screen, in the middle is very small box, which may look empty, when you click on it, you will see MSFS2020 and MSFS2024 and then little green OK button. Again, i repeat, this is showing up, before program fully opens. Also, about the link in description, I checked it yesterday and I verified I did uploaded correct link to AIG website, where you can see github link to download AIG manager BETA for MSFS2024, you just have to open that GITHUB link there, the blue one on that screen. It is the manager I have shown in the video. I wish I could help, but I did uploaded correct links. The only thing I missed unintentionally was mentioning AVSIM log in requirement. I did miss it in the video and did not realize before upload. That is my bad. But that is very straight forward process, it will prompt you to log in in the beginning of OCI package creation, and if you do not have an account, it is matter of 2 minutes to create one. It is completely free of charge and then AIG manager would remember your logged in status on AVSIM. Again, my apologies not mentioning AVSIM detail in the video. It was not an intention to miss it. I deleted that cut in editing process by mistake. Thank you and hope you can sort it out soon.

@@RobAirepicflights Yes, the Manager from Github, thats not an issue. The Injector, when its starting up, doenst have this checkbox. Which version you have? Or maybe this ONLY appears when you have both simulators installed? I only have 2024. But more important is the Manager and the link. When click, it asks me for the path to the OIC models. Which is e.g. e:\aig\oic-models. How the downloaded models will link to the community folder of 2024? Mine is also installed on drive E

@@RobAirepicflights Sorry, which Injector version you are using? Do you have both sim installed? I only have 2024. And I dont have a checkbox to choose/ What does the "create link"in the settings will do? Thats most important part: how to link the OIC models into the community folder? They are NOT installed into the community folder direct. And this you havent shown in your video

@ Hi. Thanks again for reaching out. I’m preparing second video about this to make some things about the process more clear. I will be releasing it as soon as possible. Stay tuned and hopefully that’ll answer the questions. Thank you for the support

@@supergazell7 Muchas Gracias. Much appreciated 👍

Hello. Some models yes. Some not. Well I would say this was somehow always an issue with traffic in MSFS

Hello. Avsim login is one point I missed in my video unintentionally of course. About freezing issue, I am not sure why would this happen. I can only compare it to my experience and for me it did work without any issues. The only thing I can suggest is to restart the manager, also make sure you are selecting MSFS2024 from that little drop-down menu while starting the manager and try again. Also, not sure what you mean about the links. I have checked it now, just to make sure and I did provide in description of the video correct links, one for AIG manager beta for MSFS2024 and other link is for traffic controller. Hope you will be able to sort it. I know and I understand it is not as straightforward process as with FSLTL, but for me, it did work perfectly fine. Thank you for your comment.

Hello and thank you for the comment. Unfortunately, this is not for Xbox users. These traffic addons are made only for PC users. That is the biggest difference between PC and Xbox. You will get much more customization on PC. I wish there was a good traffic program for xbox users, but there is not, and I am afraid it won't be. Due to simlink connection, which is needed for many addons like this and that is made just for PC. Sorry about that.

@RobAirepicflights sadly all this mods destroing the console experience, have fun ✌🏼

@@SaberRider_LP Unfortunately. That is not ideal, I understand. Even though it is a same game, there is actually big difference, when it comes to Mods, between PC version and console. Thank you for the comments

@@ramzygevers you are very welcome 👍

@@renegadejagd758 it’s alright. I can understand why some people may not like the complexity 👍

Hello. I have same internet 1Gb/s and I just started literally an hour ago installing those 1665 flightplans OCI packages to have complete package and it seems it is going pretty well and fast enough, I am already in one quarter so you should be good doing whole set. It is not as bad as it may sound. Of course it depends on each person internet connection. But as you have same internet connection as I do, you should be good. For me it was about 1 hour or so to do Europe package, and Global was about 3 hours. I am talking about those one click selections. Then there will be still about 1600 plans, which I am installing now.

Hello. I have added the link. If you check the description now, you will see it there. You might have to refresh the page to see it. Thank you.

Hello. Thanks a mil for your comment. Very much appreciated. I have to do proper test again and see how it compares to FSLTL. On the other hand, I do agree with you, it would be great to have more optimization available for these models so anyone can benefit from it. I personally own good PC and in my case, it does handle this pretty well, but I can fully understand, there are also people with lower spec PC's and that option would be great for them or basically anyone as mentioned. Thank you for your support.

Hello. Yes, that is for sure a downside to SI unfortunately

OMG thanks for reminder 😀. I will add it now. Thank you for the comment and your support.

I just added the link to description of that video. Thanks again for the reminder

Hello and thank you for your comment. Did you try CC in the option of the video and if I am not mistaken, there should be auto translate option provided by KZbin and you should be able to select Spanish there. Hope it will work for you. Thank you

@@RobAirepicflights Yes, of course, I have it, but it didn't appear before, now it does, I guess it's something that KZbin doesn't do automatically, I don't know the reason. Thank you for all your time, effort and knowledge to offer us these videos and help us with the simulator, it's a great contribution, besides the fact that you do it in a slow way and don't go fast in the explanations, especially for me who doesn't know English, it's appreciated. Greetings and have a good day.

@@nicolassantossantos1587 Thank you for your response. It makes me happy to hear such positive feedback from my followers. This is very much appreciated, and I am glad I can help as much as possible. Thank you for such kind words and for the support.

Hello and thank you for the comment. Yes, exactly same way. However, remember, when you will start the AIG manager first time, you need to select MSFS2020 from that little drop-down menu as seen in the video. Super important

Not sure if I am understanding your question correctly. If you are asking if it injects also GA corp aircrafts, then the answer is yes, you would be able to see also GA traffic, which is great. But of course, it also depends, how many of flight plans OCI packages you would install, otherwise if you will install only major airlines, most likely you will see very little GA activity within traffic as it might be missing models/liveries etc. So as mentioned, really depends on which packages are installed.

Yes, AIG has much more variety of models and liveries etc. Hence much bigger size. But it is totally worth it in my personal opinion

@@jaygreen4526 Hello and thank you for your comment. Thank you for such a positive feedback. It does mean a lot to me. Much appreciated 👍

Sorry to hear it did not work for you. Truth is, that AIG is not the simplest installation out there

Yes, it is not as easy as installing FSLTL. I agree on this. Thanks for the comment

Hello. I would say it is because it uses 3rd party models being downloaded from third party websites etc. Therefore, it takes a while and also depending on how big the airline and associated flight plans. But I also think the time spent on installation is well worth it

@@RobAirepicflights A far better solution to this is simply by downloading all the needed stuf up front by the developer and update where ever needed in the end when the user actually uses it. Instead the developer lets the nasty job of downloads at the end of the user. Which is, to put it mildly, quite cumbersome. Rather irritating at best. I don't know which is the better part, seeing nice AI planes or this awefull install procedure indenpendent of ones download speeds/internet connection. Doesnt deserve an award in my opinion.

@@MartinGraeff Hello and thank you for your feedback and opinion. I somehow agree on that part, that install process of AIG, even after improvements has been made, is still bit of nightmare and time consuming. It should be made much easier, for example as FSLTL installer, which works at one go. That is something I fully agree on. Thank you for the support

@@slicker55 thank you for your comment and for subscribing to my channel. It means a lot and it is definitely much appreciated

@@RobAirepicflights You're very welcome, look out for further comments as I enjoy your presentations and smash those 'Like' buttons :)

@@slicker55 Thanks a million. As mentioned, this really means a lot to me as I am trying to support others, provide decent content and grow my channel, so any support is greatly appreciated. Thank you

@@fingerhorn4 hello and thank you for the comment. While I completely accept criticism, I assure you no rude message was intended. I honestly do not see anything rude about it. I never said anything about FSLTL being bad at all and yes, you are right, I was also using it. I also assure you I appreciate dedication of anyone who is involved in development of such addons, especially when they offer it to us for free. Again, from my perspective it is just visual reference to something pointing to competition. I appreciate your comment and I understand why you may see it this way, but then again, I am not verbally mentioning anything bad about FSLTL in any of my videos.

Easily offended...nothing rude no apologies required

Bye bye FSLTL

Hello and thank you for the comment. I am sorry to hear this. Did you check if maybe one of your third party add on causing CTD? This could be one of the main reasons if you have any incompatible addon in your community folder. Hope you will manage to make it run without issues.

Hello and thank you for the comment. Yes, fully functional jetways connecting to aircrafts are still hit and miss with BATC. But I am sure they will fix it at some point. I personally believe it is something on ASOBO side, which needs to be looked at. Thank you for the support.

@@RobAirepicflights I just subbed for some new vids! I'll wait until they fix that as it breaks the immersion for me but looking forward to the updates

@ thank you very much for the support. That is really appreciated 👍

Hello and thank you for the comment. It will actually prompt you once you start creating OCI package folder to log in into AVSIM, I did not have an account myself, but it was literally matter of one minute to setup one. AIG installer needs this in case of any missing liveries or models/textures. I should have had included this in the video, but I forgot about this, and I did not want to make the video super long either. it is already long anyways. However yes, you still need Avsim log in credentials, but it is done only once and then it is remembered by the software. Once again, thank you for the comment and reminder.

I assume it does as it has drop down menu as seen in the video to select which sim you want AIG to run with. But I personally could not test it myself. I literally deleted MSFS2020 about a week ago or so. I am now using only MSFS2024. Thank you for the comment. Give it a try, I believe it does work also well in MSFS2020

yes it does

@@andy70d35 you are very welcome. Do you mean GSX with AIG models? If that’s the question, then I’m not entirely sure to be fair. I have to find out. Good point. Appreciate it

@@RobAirepicflights Thank you for the reply. Yes using GSX and AIG together, GSX has given me a few issues in the past not used it for a while because of GSX locking up and crashing.

@@andy70d35 I see. I believe when it comes to using it when AIG models are injected, then I believe it does work. Assuming you mean using GSX for your aircraft and not as ground addition to AIG models. I would first make sure to have GSX updated to latest version. I previously missed couple times the updates. You have to open FSDream team updater and check whether there is an update or not. So do make sure GSX is updated to latest version. I personally have and use GSX on every flight and I do not have issues. However, I did not test it yet along AIG models, so I need to verify that.

@@psour33 yeah it is very lengthy process unfortunately. That is a downside of AIG

That's odd. Is your internet speed slow? I used OCI to install everything it gets you overnight, in the morning everything was set

@ I believe the person who made initial comment, he might have slow speed connection. For me it was also relatively fast. I still say in the video it is lengthy process, so people are aware of this before jumping into setting up AIG.

@@OldWiseMan hello. You are absolutely right, but believe me, this was not an intentional cut to hide the response time. As you correctly mentioned, it was showcase/highlight and I simply wanted to highlight parts of the flight. In fact in one of my other video, I added written text at one point about delay in responses. Again, it was not intention to trick the audience at all. However I do appreciate this constructive criticism and feedback and I apologise if you felt this way about my video. I just wanted to explain my reasoning. At the end of the day, I do this with passion for flight simulation and for my viewers and followers so I can definitely benefit from such feedbacks and learn to improve and avoid such things in any future videos. Thank you 👍

@@RobAirepicflights Appreciate the response and totally accept that it was not intended. I've looked closely at SayIntentions and for me a key blocker to me going that route is the immersion breaking lag with responses. I'm sure it will get better with new technologies but I think it will need a more tailored LLM to be able to resolve this.

@ yes and I fully agree with you on this. I do believe however, it will be improved in some future updates. Thank you for your response. I appreciate it

Hello and sorry for the confusion. Ai traffic controller from AIG was accessed from separate folder, its separate download from AIG site. It was my bad as I did not noticed bad cut in my video during editing. Thank you for pointing that out.👍

@@RobAirepicflights The AI controller form AIG is only compitable with FS2020. Do you have an injector compitable with FS2024 from AIG?

@ if you have beyond ATC, that will be best solution or also FSHud does work well. But Ai traffic injector from AiG does work for me with few little bugs but it works. I’m currently making new video with lots of details about this topic. Stay tuned

Yeah this is definitely true. They need to improve that in the sim

Hello. Thank you for the comment. Very good idea for the video. I’ll do my best to try to make such comparison video👍

There's a comparison video, it's a year old but I think it's still relevant: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l6bUhJuIhd9ggJosi=FugIU0pD3twS5snP

@ thank you for pointing this out.

@@animaxima8302 im not sure if this is relevant, because both have updated / changed their injectors. And its the wrong sim (2020)

​@@Tyrell63 the injectors may be newer but I doubt the way they perform have changed this results significantly. The models poly count and livery quality are the same, and that's what represent the bulk of the graphics load affecting FPS count on any system or sim version

totally agree. AIG claims they are not the developer of the sounds... yeah I know right?

@@user-zc9zt2vl5s to be honest, I think sounds are okayish. Not wow but okay. I guess maybe using third party sounds if there are any for AI traffic, could be an option. Thanks for your opinion👍

@@animaxima8302Hello. I did not know they said that. Interesting. Thanks for the comment

@@willyr6raven I have to find out. My bad I did not mention that in the video. That is actually very good point👍

@@Partner737NG hmm this is interesting. Good point. Thanks for sharing

Hi. I believe it would work. I have not tested that option but I’m pretty sure it would work

@RobAirepicflights ok, I give the 2048 version s a try and compare it with Fsltl if, if it works .

@ great. Hope it’ll work for you without any issues 👍

@@RobAirepicflights No issues, it works fine with 2048 textures

@@rogermorered Awesome. Thank you for reporting back to me. Appreciate it

Yes, it kind of works. I tested it and it definitely injects traffic using AIG models, however during my test, traffic was not moving, nor departing etc. Maybe it was just a conflict with the airport I tested it at, but not entirely sure. However, give it a try, certainly FSLTL recognized and loaded AIG models

you can complement the models FSLTL don't have (over 80 of them) with AIG models, or FS Traffic (payware) they run fine with the FSLTL injector. There are still issues in both sims, but it's mostly usable in 2024. Not sure about the exact count but AIG kinda triples the amount of models and liveries FSLTL has.

@ hello. Thanks for the comment. Yes, the variety in AIG is impressive. I like it very much. Also the models are looking very good in my opinion. FSLTL models also look nice but I guess I now prefer AIG

@@nicholaspb9133 thank you for the comment. Yes I agree, that part of Beyond ATC is bit annoying that you have to load simbrief flight plan

@@CaptZebulon hello and thank you for the comment. I personally have not tested FSHud just yet. I have seen some video recently about it but it appeared to me unnecessary complex as of UI. Maybe I’ll give it a try one day. Thanks for recommendations.

Hello and appreciate your comment. I am liking both, but I have to be honest, lately I am leaning more towards Beyond ATC, especially because it does traffic control pretty well.

I admit, at the end of the day, it’s not cheap.