The devil gives, fame and fortune and skill, but it comes with rules you will dislike always. He always destroys the vessel he uses. And you will never win if he is on your side.
@PraveshUpadhyay-j8c21 күн бұрын
I am shocked 😯😳 hearing
@inavleeshouwer206423 күн бұрын
You are AWESOME!
@chosen11124 күн бұрын
Amazing video, great work
@古屋芳子-u9hАй бұрын
I was wondering if you could tell us why Ainu appeared in Joumon period. Thanks
@NYCPeruvianАй бұрын
Thank you for this content
@briangeorge8321Ай бұрын
Good break down, thanks
@BlayekStarАй бұрын
I must present on Suprematism, Kazimir Malevich, for my art college class. I try to be open to different kinds of art as an artist, but I can not swallow this "art" of Kazimir Malevich. In 1000 years with no context, what would the future humans get from it? Thank you for your video.
@kuuttinenАй бұрын
I think it is relatable, and where I live my mother's generation was still one of sacrifice so it's easy to understand this. I think that the brief happiness they had stayed with them, at least they could remember those good memories instead of thinking what if.
@TeriRae12 ай бұрын
I love this! I know what I like with regards to art; I’ve never taken a class in it though. I was having difficulty in finding a name for a new horse: this exactly describes her - the contrast of light and shadow, darkness providing depth. She’s a buckskin (tan body coat, black legs and ear tips and mane and tail). What a wonderful word filled with meaning to describe her!
@Ammaramaya2 ай бұрын
Fzol video
@zammismartines10322 ай бұрын
0:41 Was that a pokémon ref? lol
@EyeLean52802 ай бұрын
Fantastic! Going to show this to my students this semester. Thank you!
@aahanaomg6893 ай бұрын
Every painting in a museum: Thx for explaining it was rlly helpful ❤
@pauloeuvreart52473 ай бұрын
I believe tgat Contemporary art can only be defined in reverse. It’s nowadays art; the term will remain the same in time to describe what’s created now. But as history unfolds, what’s known as contemporary now, if it’s united and coherent enough, will receive new defining terms. We can’t possibly know for sure what today’s trends will be called, but in 50 years, or a century, that will be clear. 😂
The curator of this content is on point. Frida and her story are an inspiration.
@crystalDM964 ай бұрын
This story made me sad but it isn't a true love story since they only fell in love because of a potion
@hannahklein69044 ай бұрын
Great and informational video!
@priyanshumishra19224 ай бұрын
The "Object" is about what sign refers ....it is not a concept or signified .....even signified is closely related to " Interpretant
@99Akhi4 ай бұрын
the video when im alone: 0:30 the video when my mom walks in: 3:08
@rokiyasultana50635 ай бұрын
❤🎉 wb
@meme-bo6hq5 ай бұрын
artists are really getting away with just anything
@Pawansing09h6 ай бұрын
I searched it after watching doremon where dekisugi explained that era
@mattlong92596 ай бұрын
Please write us back, we are huge fans.
@tea_Dragon_boi6 ай бұрын
My college art class made colored yarn out of cochineal and different plants this quarter. It's such an amazing class. :)
@paulleverton95696 ай бұрын
Every generation believes they invented 'free love'. Heloise (1101-64) was a strong woman who opposed marriage, due to it making a woman into her husbands property. Mary Wollstoncraft (1759-97) held very similar beliefs, nearly 700 years later. Dorothy L Sayers invented a female character who opposed conventional marriage, in STRONG POISON, 1930. Although she went on to become the wife of Lord Peter Wimsey.
@EmilyMullz6 ай бұрын
I think the last one was me during my last nervous breakdown.
@SanjaySharma-ip9zp7 ай бұрын
Explain it in hindi all video pls
@aletheav62087 ай бұрын
Hey there, great video! What’s the painting called that you are using as an example?
@mohandas16217 ай бұрын
Who gives these names and how do they identify different art movements? Are there paintings/painters that belong to more than one movement?
@SidewaysBurnouts7 ай бұрын
where can i find the image at 0:16 ? I want to use it for a project.
@upcloseimage7 ай бұрын
This was a simple and easy to understand explanation of iconoclasm. Thank you!
@mrpluto6377 ай бұрын
Excellent video. I like the way you put it together. :)
@jpauhiro26077 ай бұрын
Glox story!
@adelinemukashema12448 ай бұрын
Thank’ you ❤
@cultureandtheory50978 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for the video; your knowledge is greatly appreciated and has been incredibly helpful
@cultureandtheory50978 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for the video; your knowledge is greatly appreciated and has been incredibly helpful!
@cultureandtheory50978 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for the video; your knowledge is greatly appreciated and has been incredibly helpful!
@cultureandtheory50978 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for the video; your knowledge is greatly appreciated and has been incredibly helpful!
@maitri.IndiaJapan8 ай бұрын
I from india japan ♥️india 😊
@shreeyapaul97648 ай бұрын
Woww😮
@GuadalupeRivera-t4c8 ай бұрын
I am a Rooster 🎉
@Zodiezzz9 ай бұрын
From 1:27 to 2:20 (almost 1/3 of your video) is completely plagiarized from the Wikipedia article’s section titled analysis. Below is the text from the Wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitsch Modernist writer Hermann Broch argues that the essence of kitsch is imitation: kitsch mimics its immediate predecessor with no regard to ethics-it aims to copy the beautiful, not the good.[7] According to Walter Benjamin, kitsch, unlike art, is a utilitarian object lacking all critical distance between object and observer. According to critic Winfried Menninghaus, Benjamin's stance was that kitsch "offers instantaneous emotional gratification without intellectual effort, without the requirement of distance, without sublimation".[6] In a short essay from 1927, Benjamin observed that an artist who engages in kitschy reproductions of things and ideas from a bygone age deserved to be called a "furnished man"[8] (in the way that someone rents a "furnished apartment" where everything is already supplied). Kitsch is less about the thing observed than about the observer.[9] According to Roger Scruton, "Kitsch is fake art, expressing fake emotions, whose purpose is to deceive the consumer into thinking he feels something deep and serious."[10]
@aelearn9 ай бұрын
x1.75 speed sounds much better.
@Raj-fv7ge9 ай бұрын
I am confused between index and icon as both meaninng is same ?? Can anyone tell me ?? What is arbitary meaning ??