0:28 The TRUE father of the Argentinian Nation

The beer back in Egypt time was food, as it still had the grains in it. The alcohol served as preservative.

You probably know, but one of the new spanish made submarines is to be named after him. S-81 Isaac Peral S-82 Narciso Monturio S-83 Cosme García S-84 Mateo García de los Reyes

Too bad he was a commie.

1:55 Where did you get this animation from?

I am the granddaughter of Enrique Camps Gaspar, blood related to Enrique Gaspar Rimbau. Thankyou for your video on Anacronopete, however, you have incorrect information in your video. The niece is not Clarita. In the book, anancronopete, line 17 page 41, the niece is introduced as Clara. “Who responds to the name of Clara” (Like Clara in back to the future 3 ) Please do fact check for yourself. I wouldn’t wish your viewers to be misinformed in any way. Thankyou Anne-Marie

España tuvo un Imperio Cuiltural, religioso y humanistico. Inglaterra un Imperio comercial brutal. Utilizando hasta los opiodes para dominar al pueblo chino. De ahi el odio de los chinos a los occidentales en la epoca de Mao, por no hablar de Gandhi y su revolucion pacifica contra Inglaterra y en el s. XX el asesinato de lord Mountbatten el último virrey de la India. Habian además partido la india con Paquistan.😮 Nada que ver ambos imperios. Uno iba siempre con frailes y religiosos y el otro con baratijas que llevaban a vender a los chinos. A cambio de seda. Hoy es al revés.😂😂 los chinos nos mandan baratijas y nosotros les enviamos carne de cerdo y jamon español. 😂 Y durante 300 años la plata en forma de moneda del Perú. 😊

Lmao imagine bragging about her being the first feminist Spanish nationalist are truly pathetic

😂

I don't believe that Beresford just made the plans to invade on the move. When the British arrived in Buenos Aires all of the Aristocracy there was waiting with open arms. The marched from Ensenada to Buenos Aires and where housed in Patrician homes. It was Liniers a Frenchman the gauchos and the Afros who resisted. That was not on the British or Spanish Patrician Plans.

Dios Bendiga

I find this video more focused on being humorous, than being accurate and well reaearched

stop being Insulting while doing this

The Spanish national anthem does not have lyrics... only the fascist version has lyrics...

your lisp is unbearable

UEFA European champions 2024, Final Spain 2 England 1

Along similar lines, _The March of Folly_ by historian Barbara Tuchman is a classic from a few decades ago.

Cheap lhyspamic abour plantations

I actually met Mr. Belafonte when his daughter was with the (US) National Shakespeare Company. I expressed my appreciation for his activism. He truly was one of the good guys of this world.

My recommendation as a retired academic: * Get thee to a good library. * Use online literature searches * Use Google scholar. * Always take a good look at the literature cited for more leads * Books, books, books. * Don't forget older, printed encyclopedias (esp. EB).

Just look at who created crypto and why. I thought it obvious to all that it was the Libertarian ideal: an unregulated jungle catering to illegal transfers where the most ruthless schemers would end up fleecing the flock.

For those arguing Simplified History is only about joke delivery, you are overlooking how learning actually works. Most persons naive to history will subconsciously absorb errors as facts. Look how History Channel went from educational to crappola and how most sci-fi and history movies impart misunderstanding. I agree with the content creator that accuracy matters, even when entertainment is the goal. The Columbus video could easily have gotten it right, had they cared. As for the Viking game, I as a Swede, find it to be megacringe.

The real Captain Nemo. Forgotten genius...

A Spanish friend tipped me off to Torres y Quevedo just last week. Un genio verdero.

10:40 hahahah

Great story very well told. Spoilers: the second invasion (1807) gets even better and it ends...

very interesting AND a recreation of the actual time vehicle! wonderful work!

Very interesting! Waiting for Part 2!

Los españoles tenían armas de fuego, los ingleses no.

Love the historical twist

Hey, she was Isabella's daughter. She could be the first English feminist, but her mother was before her.

You forgot to note that Alfonso XIII lost his throne to the Second Republic (which would end in Civil War), and that many blame him for abandoning Primo de Rivera - who was a very rare bird: A dictator who was actually a good person.

Would JUan de Valera be an ancestor of Eamon de VAlera?

Maybe you'd like to make a video about Blas de Lezo,

Somehow the guy with the pin strikes me as the worst of all cases. Dying is one thing but that... that is just.... wow.

Argentinians should be the greatest Anglophiles of South America, and a lot of people there still admire the UK and wish that sometime in the past they had joined the Empire so that today they would be like Canada or Australia. UK and Argentina were extremely close allies up to about the 1930s, towards the end of this time, fascist Argentine politicians started to take over, and this is when Argentina was very close to going the other way, and joining the Axis, and in 1946 they voted in the fascist, General Peron. For example: to look at the Argentine Army of the time, was to look at the Wehrmacht. Argentina bet on the wrong horse and even after 1945 they carried on down that road. These other Argentinians, the Anglophobes, have absorbed the fascist propaganda of the education system which starts at 6 and 7 years old and tries to turn Argentine history into a constant conflict, in which Argentina has been trying to fend off the UK, from conquering it. This was done in this way by Peron and has remained like this since the 1940s. The idea is to make all Argentinians the same so that they are easier to govern, as per fascist theories which also try to unite the people inside against an enemy outside. In order to achieve this version of history, the fascists distort the facts profoundly, not only the complete history of the Falklands (goes without saying) but everything else. They describe the “English Invasions” not as an attack on Spanish power during the Napoleonic wars (1806-1807) during the years before Argentina existed. The fascists try to paint this action as an attack against Argentina itself (which didn’t even exist at the time of those attacks). The Spanish renegades, 3 or 4 years after that intervention by the UK, deposed the Spanish Viceroy in a revolution and the renegades claimed to be the ones loyal to the deposed Spanish Bourbons in 1810 and were using the Bourbon colours blue and white, in order to prove this. During this movement they executed the hero of the resistance against the earlier British action, which was a Frenchman called Liniers. In the made up Argentine history, these “Argentinians” claimed the credit for the victory and trophies of Liniers and the Spanish arms as if they had been Argentine trophies. Another good one was “Vuelta de Obligado”: the French and British tried to break the monopoly of Buenos Aires over the commerce of Paraguay and the interior provinces which were separate from Buenos Aires. The British and French sent war ships up river escorting commerce ships to the interior ports, and the Argentinians of today make a big meal of this and distort all the facts - no country was trying to claim sovereignty from Argentina, they were simply trying not to pay taxes to the Buenos Aires monopoly over commerce at the start of the river, right by the sea, the European powers were supporting freedom of navigation in order to assist all the interior of Argentina which Buenos Aires was trying to dominate and to fleece. So the Argentinians who absorb all this fabricated fascist history obviously have nothing but suspicions about the UK and are very anti-UK and anti-USA, they are fascists, Mussolini style, this is the work of General Peron who studied in Mussolini’s Italy. The “nationalist Argentinians” sort of characterise themselves for thinking that they are the ones who are “aware”, “clever”, they know it is “them” and “they” are everywhere, a power never to be defeated, a “world conspiracy” against Argentina, and this they read in to everything that goes on, a sort of paranoia if you like. So there you have the two extremes from the British point of view.

Hey brother! It's a pity to see you have lost motivation in making videos on this topic, it is very rare to see anglophone videos on the Spanish perspective of the Age of Sail! There's a lot of British misinformation and exaggeration of their naval prowess that few are working to correct. I understand that it takes a lot of work to research and animate the history of wars, but perhaps doing just individual battles might be easier to handle, and perhaps get you more exposure with time. Some examples of major Spanish victories could be the Battle of the Gulf of Cadiz (1596), Action of 9 August 1780, or the Battle of Cartagena de Indias (1741), or the Battle of Pensacola (1781) where Spain retook Florida. Or perhaps you could mention how during the Battle of Trafalgar Spain only lost 10 ships and had the Santísima Trinidad, the largest Ship of the Line in history, mostly taken down by the incompetence of the French Admiral. Wish you best of luck, man. Don't give up! We need people like you to be our myth buster! Popularity will come with time, I'm certain.

As a Mexican I thank you gentlemen for this video for the most part our public education systems tells us we never won a battle and never had a chance against the Anglosphere but from Veracruz to Buenos Aires we all know that’s not true , you are invited to the carne asada with honors Sir.

Chat gpt is programmed by the engloids of silocon valley, so I'm not surprised the system is biased after all its all systematic racism. FOR EXAMPLE The Santa Ana 3 decker galleon was the only Spanish Galleon to sink british ships without being sunk or captured by the british due to the experienced crewmen but chat gpt says it was captured and sunk by the british which is false! After agrueing with it for 3 minutes it finally agreed with me. THEY ARE TRYING TO REWRITE HISTORY BY LIEING ENOUGH TIMES THAT IT BECOMES TRUTH TO THE YOUNGER GENERATION THAT CANT FIND THE TRUTH BECAUSE ITS HIDDEN AND FORBIDDEN UNDER THE ANGLO LIE WHICH IS OPPRESSION. 😤

Came here from Drone invention history

She was an enemy of Scotland.

Thats why Montevideo was named "The Heroic" by the spanish empire, because of its deeds.

History controlled somewhat by the English, that’s why most don’t know about this!

Respectfully I could only tolerate 1 minute of this. It sounds like you’re desperately holding in a shit because you’re on a tight schedule. Not saying it’s the worst thing ever, but combined with the uncomfortable amount of bias against the British just makes it an awkward watch… feels like listening to a constipated James Madison. Idk if you’ve ever played Fallout, but you really sound similar to the Ghouls, especially that guy in “Come Fly With Me” in New Vegas. Not trying to hate, you’re a small channel and have potential. But you can’t claim that these things are “overlooked” or “neglected” while portraying everything on par with North Korean history lessons. I mean you literally have an evil giggle whenever the British invaders are mentioned. It’s like watching an Israeli talk about the history of Palestine…

@Negcleted Histories - You presented quite ok, only you were wrong. The first standard vehicle that could use the acceleration, brake, steering system, seat for the driver - possibly also the passenger - was Karl Benz (Germany) and not the person presented by you. That person from Flanders (the old name of Bergia) was just a prototype. Why only a prototype? He had no control of the acceleration, the brake. Only the direction and a rudimentary one. Later, the French made an engine whose fuel was steam and it didn't have the standard brakes that we know today, it only had a slightly more developed direction and only one seat for the driver. This French-made steam vehicle carried a cannon, which means it was a military vehicle. In Germany a little later, the first modern vehicle was made: engine with flammable liquid, modernized and controllable steering, brake and acceleration - it was Karl Benz's car. Officially, the first standard car was produced in Germany. Ferdinand Verbiest had not heard of acceleration and braking, only of steering control and a simple and rudimentary, prototype engine. A prototype cannot be considered the official version of a car.

Too bad the vehicle was unveiled in china where the conservative Qing rulers suppress science. If the vehicle was in europe, there will be many fuel source vehicle invented before 1769

i can't loggin right now it's been 2 days no answer !

I'm rolling with your comments man this is brilliant

ur just an idiot

UR MAD