I luv this guy ...Hickaru , this man played a game once , with 200 moves

I dozed away 3 times wathing this video 😂

I have a question. This game was ding v gukesh. They played the same game then?

With a ton of blunders, not even close to being Magnus 2.0

Also I don't know your ratings but I think you should give fewer follow up of what they should have done. I'd say they both have a better grasp of the game than either of us. Just let it play out. Have to be 1900+ minimum to watch a 20min chess video. So less talk more action.

The early A6 is not for his knight. It's to press and take away white squares for whites bishop. The white bishop for white is now cramped up with really only E7 as a continuation

I heard the word "blunder" a few times, but then again this is speed-chess. One wonders if Nakamura might have been a bit arrogant and assumed he could beat the kid...

Sounds horrible - less reading / memorizing, more speaking freely.

Wasn’t Hikaru, a superGM nonetheless but not Hikaru. Y’all funny

I’ve learned a lot from your comment. But from my point of view that’s showing Hikaru errors and not that his opponent is the such good. (I don’t know however if that number of errors are expected from best players in this blitz context.)

Faustino Oro en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faustino_Oro

Danya would never blunder like this, he just look to the left and plays the right continuation ;)

I only think that Magnus would win because historical context is very important in this game. Magnus would have more of it.

😎

The commentary would make more sense in the context of being able to see the remaining time after each move. Given that Hikaru evidently had a relative wealth of time at the end...and that both players made a bunch of blunders.. ... we can easily conclude that Hikaru was on full-tilt autopilot, which is totally understandable in a 3 minute blitz game.

Nakamura was awful, as the commentary shows, blew chances to have a winning position then blundered badly, gifted the game

Great breakdown, cool sunglasses. What's not to like?👌

Way too much commentary. “If Magnus scratches his left testicle before developing his King side bishop his opponent will definitely pick his nose before countering with knight to G7”

Faustino: "Hikaru you are no match for me." 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

Good Lord waaaaay too much comentary

Hikaru played at 70%. Similar to other games against Chessi 😂

Mister! DIM the lights and take the shades off! The bright white background is hurting our eyes too!

Loved this, great analysis mate!

Babbling again for 17:30 min to comment on 12 moves.

11:18 nice editing there with the time-lapse outdoor shot!

G4 is not bad😂. But it’s not the best and not necessary 😮 to confuse your opponents

Peek a boo, Hick a roo, mate in two, shame on you.

Thumbnail - Is this the next Carslen Vidoe - Shows a game full of blunders and missed opportunity

It sounds like you're saying HikaRO rather than the correct HikaRU. Apart from that irritating detail, good video, thank you.

Weak play from nakA

Too many weak moves, he got lucky.

Consider other Knight moves to E2 to defend @3:10

To many errors from both , but that happens in speed games

It would be nice to see IM or GMs in Rapid

Too much explanation

I'm only an NM and most of those moves aren't too hard to find. Could I put them all together in a sequence against a strong player? Sometimes, but not as consistently as stronger players. To me Fischer is the strength of modern 2700+ gm's, with out of date openings. If you took him in his prime, and plopped him in today's era, and gave him some time to catch up, he would be a legit WC contender. I think the opposition in his era were just noticeably weaker than modern players. I think if you could take a prime Fischer and put him in the Titled Tuesday's he'd definitely win some. His main weakness versus modern players would be his openings, but that wouldn't matter as much in blitz.

Welldon gukesh Bro

This one is a good one 👍 😊

mate in 595 moves by Lutz Neweklowsky is the worldrecord for longest mate-composition : kzbin.info/www/bejne/jKGUY2iQe696hck

Excellent analysis

Love your break down but lose the silly 'if he had two moves' fill in. Waste of time

Very nice commentary

Brilliant chess channel! Many thanks for your content.

I put you on silent, that drivel is unbearable

The thing about the Grob is, as long as you are not playing against a computer, there will be fatal mistakes in going against it. I've had some wild games with it.

Your analysis is quite messy and boring. Not at all interesting

Flip the board when black wins.

Arjun and Gukesh are Magnus kryptonite

More entertaining than watching men chasing balls around a pitch, and vastly superior commentary too.

Very lucid and well paced commentary. Thanks for this.