Williams Frank Rodriguez Jeffrey Thompson Frank

So nobody gonna talk about that euthanization part?

Why does this channel not have more views? All videos since the ISV are amazingly well

Cool presentation and explanation! Wonder if you are speculating on certain aspects - how do you know things like laser from earth and sail?

Looks cool, except that none of it will actually ever work.

One of my favourite videos on KZbin

350 tons? Thats less then one starship or 4 houses or 50 cars or 3,086,387 cheese burgers

Hope Elon make it

In my opinion, this was a very well done overview of the ISV - Interstellar ships and their basic operation . Good Job.

❤❤

❤❤

Did you know that the ISV is just a modified copy of the Valkyrie from Charles pellegrino and George zebrowski (read the Killing star if you like it, it also talks about relativistic cluster bombs and a dark forest like solution to the Fermi paradox)

This is literally a WORD FOR WORD copy paste from the NOMAD wiki page 💀💀💀 yeah great job

these videos look really good, keep up the work

Warp Drive is possible. Energy needed currently is not.

2:51 Someone in that studio went ham on that beat.

Three engine system would be much more stable than two engines. Perhaps the artist chose two engines because they looked cooler and even if a science consultant had second thoughts about it, it was too late to change the design or Cameron chose looks over the engineering.

So what happens if a large enough piece of debris knocks the mirror shields out of alignment? Also, how are these ISV’s structurally able to withstand atmosphere if they were built for spacefaring, because in the movie the cable wasn’t miles long?

Would be cool if you made one these videos on the Endurance from Interstellar.

Love your videos, visually pleasing, plain and direct to the point I would love to see a video about Halo rings or something else from Halo

It’s a pod racer 😎

Awesome work!

Awesome been waiting for another one! Well done again!

Nasa with the us military's budget

So the mirror loses most of it's functionality during deceleration?

Minor things that keep this a bit unrealistic: - We cant make antimatter in any serious way. - We cant store antimatter in any serious way - The ship should be quite longer than shown in the movie, it was cut because it would appear all in one in the imagine (or so they say). - Unobtanium is well... scifi. Superconductors would be the way to go (if possible). - And more.... And STILL its the most realistic ship to date and we use it to go to the closest star.... (space travel sucks).

The most unrealistic thing to me was burning the fusion drives down into atmo. I thought it was cool how they lowered the cargo pods below them. But really, fusion would be too low thrust for that application. It'll get you up to high speed over a long period of time but it's not going to lift or lower anything against the gravity of a planet or moon...

The problem with this scene is that the engine plumes are antimatter fueled so everything should be dying on the planet from radiation poisoning

The one design flaw that Cameron missed out is that since antimatter engines produce massive amounts of lethal gamma rays, so the engines would need to be heavily shielded from the rest of the ship.

The NASA engineer who designed this for Cameron did take some poetic license and scaled it up a bit for theatrical reasons, but this is the closest rendition we have of a practical interstellar spaceship. One thing that bugs me of the sequel is that the entire system is designed with one ISV at Pandora, one being refurbished at Earth and the other 10 in transit, 5 to Pandora, and 5 returning to Earth. Lightspeed cannot be broken, so it would have taken Earth a minimum of 4 years to be notified of the uprising by Radio. And 5 for the first return flight to arrive with the survivors. By then 5 ships would have arrived at Pandora, had to wait for their return slot while in Orbit and flew back. Why did not of them respond? It would have taken them over a decade to stop the entire cycler system and set up a invasion force. But they would have had to build a massive network of laser station at earth to launch a flotilla.

Great video! Thanks! :)

Once the algorithm finds you you’ll be massive :)

Amazing channel 👏👏❤️

That techno music needs to go.

is there a lore regarding on how they got the first unobtainium samples and how it was discovered?

Background music name?

There isn't any shield of the ISV as shown in Passengers film to protect it from space dust, meteors while travelling at very high speed. Therefore, it is a big lack of design of ISV.

Whoever thought of this thing is nuts

7:25 ok but, wouldn't it also be toxic to humans due to the large amount of radiation produced by the exhausted fumes ?

solo los aficionados a kerbal sabrán lo que digo: jool be like kerbals yendo a laythe con el mod de nuevas piezas sola mente para dejarlos ahí para siempre porque no hay plan de regreso jajsajaja xdxd

Aligbahd

Why not put the crew in front of the engine so they dont face the radiation blasts...

Awesome

Another well put together video! so happy i found this channel!!

Honestly, if humans have this kind of tech the Navi dont stand a chance.

Not to be that guy, but spice is *anything* but a narcotic. The name narcotic comes from the Greek root narcō, meaning numb. Narcotic drugs are mainly used to numb and suppress cognition, and heavy users of narcotics such as opioids essentially become catatonic over time.

Almost all spacecraft (both in fiction and in real life) are pusher designs. Metal alloys are much stronger for tension than for compression, so a puller/tractor design is more structurally efficient, meaning that much less mass is used up by structural components. The ISV is such a clever design. Hats off to the designers. However, I found it a bit far fetched the ISV hover maneuver. The F-35 and the Harrier, tiny in comparisson, can carve large holes on unpaved ground, let alone a mile-long rocket. The exhaust would certanly carve an enormous crater, destroying the surface for the cargo to land. Furthermore, an atmospheric (re)entry would be difficult for such large non-aerodynamic vehicle. I think they should have kept the shuttles of the first movie.

You Can't Name A Better "Ship" Than NOMAD, I LOVE IT, IT'S PERFECT ALL THE WAY, It Got Me Rooting For It, LOL

Well... The Darkstar, I Believe Was Meant To Be Stealthy, So In A Sense, The Darkstar Is Sort Of A Success And A Failure, It Can Fly At The Speed Of Mach 10 But At What Cost? With The Heat Signature That Big, It's Just A Giant Target But Of Course, With The Speed, No Missile Could Hit It...

Great presentation ruined by the rave-bunny dico music.