New technologies that are currently not on the UCI ban list mean the riders in question can't be accused.
@nocturnal19707 күн бұрын
What a clueless wonder 😮 Drug tests are a joke when anyone can microdose EPO and then the newer methods.
@h.k.85357 күн бұрын
LeMond is a master at projecting- I’ve never, ever believed he didn’t use PIDs at his peak. End.
@stevenaaus8 күн бұрын
Lemond talking about more than he knows, imho.
@jeremyleake686811 күн бұрын
Key fact here is to fuel for 40% of your energy consumption during a long Z2 ride. That can be a large amount of carbs if your Z2 is high. Eg my Z2 (70% max HR) is around 245W. That is around 880kc per hour (=3.6x245). Eating 40% of that is around 350kc or 90g (=350/4) carbs per hour. Reverse engineering that calculation, someone needing 120g carbs per hour for a Z2 ride is riding at around 325W for Z2 which is what Pogacar said his Z2 was approx when interviewed by Peter Attia. That is extreme but my first calculation shows how much many amateurs may be underfuelling for their Z2 rides if they are just getting themselves a bun or cake slice at a coffee shop.
@erlendsteren946616 күн бұрын
My weightshredding plan is burning away obecity with1,1 grams pr kilometer on the bike, combined with somewhat thoughtful eating. I have did this with 6600 km this year biking away from 7 kg. Previous years the plan has failed in the late autumn, but not now, because I have got an indoor trainer, keeping my biking consistent trhough every single month in the year.
@johnrusche825620 күн бұрын
This is like saying that Pete Rose would risk it all by betting on baseball. It all depends upon this -- Is Froome stupid enough to believe that he would not get caught? I don't know that.
@Andyras121 күн бұрын
Cheers Anthony, im putting that submaximal test into my weekly training, after a rest day as a warmup before a harder session, there's good descriptions of the testing out there I used 6mins at 60% ftp, 6mins at 80% ftp, 3mins at 90%ftp then the heart rate recovery for 1min interesti g stuff thanks for the podcast...
@thatguy905122 күн бұрын
THIS STUFF IS GOLD---THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU ROADMAN!!!
@FionaNeems23 күн бұрын
Thanks Anthony - so much gold here in the extract. I've recently completed the Science To Sport online coaching course. John and his team are a first in class organization that educate cycling sport science in practical terms. 11/10
@roadmanpodcastclips22 күн бұрын
Fantastic! I must check that out. I had a lab test off them in Girona 2 weeks ago. Ouch!
@kevinkwmiller24 күн бұрын
This clip doesn't talk about the headline, "Why you're always tired". It's about carbs and weight.
@fabiovalentinuzzi558926 күн бұрын
Why does Greg Lemond have Barad-Dur as a MS-Teams background? 😅
@aaronholdaway600829 күн бұрын
You could’ve just stopped, recording, found out the right answers, and then re-recorded it
@aaronholdaway600829 күн бұрын
It takes away credibility when you and the nutritionist fumble about converting kilojoules to actual calories
@ECTproCycling29 күн бұрын
Your garmin gives you calories though... just look at that...
@philip27429 күн бұрын
Hold on, so, can I eat Haribo or not?
@garthTurningCranks29 күн бұрын
if that's what available or if that's what "brings you joy" when you eat them on the bike, go for it. It shouldn't be a sole source, but put it in the mix. My personal sugary snack is cinnamon bears, very different flavor profile and helps break up the sweet.
@caryblackburn460129 күн бұрын
I decided to watch this clip in the hope that I would be listening to someone who knew what they were talking about. Sadly I've just wasted my time.
@AlejandroSiguere29 күн бұрын
The human body is about 20-25% efficient in converting chemical energy (from food) into mechanical work on a bike. For a cyclist riding steadily, the kilojoules measured by the power meter closely approximate the total energy expenditure in kilocalories due to this efficiency. 1 kilojoule (mechanical work) ≈ 1 kilocalorie (biological energy expenditure)
@johnduddy235929 күн бұрын
It's pretty odd that she's on here as an expert yet doesn't understand the difference between kj and kcals.... The kj value that your computer gives you is an amount of work done... Literally the energy that you have put into the pedals.... To calculate the amount of energy you have burned to output that amount, you need to take into account the energy efficiency of the human body. A rough rule of thumb is that 1kj of work done required 1kcal of chemical energy in your body to be burned
@tonictonesАй бұрын
A kj is roughly equal to a kcal because roughly 20-25% of the power exerted to push your bike is actually converted to mechanical energy, the rest is released as heat. For simplicity, we assume 0.239 mechanical efficiency to equate kj to kcals.
@SteakandChainsАй бұрын
0:33 humans are made of proteins fats and minerals. While carbs are beneficial they aren’t necessarily to replenish glycogen stores. Protein isn’t a fuel source unless you completely deplete your glycogen stores. 1:56 absolutely not. It does not offset carbs. It may slow absorption if you eat protein first.
@JoshThompson-v7tАй бұрын
I think you may want to reconsider what your average listener does for training: I don't think most of us stop at a coffee shop mid training ride. That seems like sacrilege to me 😂
@wojplask28 күн бұрын
Fighting to get 60-120 min for training a day, between work, kids, partner time, house work, proper sleeping. Ain't gonna waste 20 min for a coffee.....
@geoffnash2609Ай бұрын
7:35 120g CHO/h using the calculation below would require an energy expenditure of 4250kJ for the same ride or more than 1000kJ per hour. Roadman avg 210W for 4.25 hours for 2634kJ. Consider your power output before trying to take in 120g/hour. Most mere mortals can not sustain the power to justify it.
@geoffnash2609Ай бұрын
3:40 calculating Carbs required from power. Total kJ 2634 in 4.25 hours = 620kJ/hour. /4.184 to convert to Cal = 148 Cal/hour. Replacement @ Z2ish effort = approx 40%. Replacement at threshold = approx 50%. 148 x .4 = 59g CHO/h for lower intensity. At higher intensity 148 x .5 = 74g CHO/h. So estimation of 75g CHO/hour would be at the upper estimated range of a low intensity ride. But given the 4+ hours duration that would seem reasonable. NB CHO means carbohydrate NOT chocolate.
@jeremyleake686811 күн бұрын
Your last point is very important too. Chocolate has a lot of fat in the form of cocoa butter, so not a great fuel for riding. Better go for high sugary fuels.
@ketjuariittaaАй бұрын
2 cat type of cyclist… 1) racers/pro 2) everybody else… …2) don’t need any food for 2h bikeride. How hard it mite be. Those people like i was, soffa🥔, need that training away from food to burn fats. IntermitinFasting and 2 meals /day. Why is that (mostly)all you talk about are proracer mealtimes and eating all the time.😢 There is so much overweight people (i was that) who need good advice.😊
@johannese.5211Ай бұрын
I think kj at Training peaks is mechanical work. There is also a kcal value that is better for Energie use(food)
@jakobklinge_paracyclingАй бұрын
Great conversation, thanks guys!💪🏽🌱⚡️
@jimjams8320Ай бұрын
There is too much cheating in the Peloton. These interviews are pointless and old. At this point, LeMond is just whining.
@richardmiddleton7770Ай бұрын
Most people aren't doing intensity AND volume, and certainly not on back to back days. Glycogen has plenty of time to be replenished with a proper training schedule. How much glycogen do you need?! Maybe you could train and fuel in a way where you don't need as much glycogen?! Food for thought!
@lionelbrinkАй бұрын
This has been one of the most informative Roadman podcasts I have ever listened to - twice! The content is pure gold IMHO even if I am only a mid field plodder (age group) ;-)
@josedelatorre7560Ай бұрын
Affects!
@c0mm3nt-m8eАй бұрын
Most of the time i change tyres when puncture from outside
@domd2304Ай бұрын
I always find it very difficult to lose weight when cycling/training. Much easier to lose weight doing resistance exercise but endurance really piles on the kg's without really diligently resisting eating more.
@cliffcox7643Ай бұрын
Amazing thay they can't use anti-inflammatory, pain killers when footballers get a shot on the sidelines.. people have pain from injuries or need steroids for inflammatory injuries or need bronchodialators . Just normal meds that DONT enhance performance.
@gabrieleventuri5382Ай бұрын
Old Cycling Omertà is that you?
@christianCarbstrongАй бұрын
What to do about not losing weight? Eat more and drink more water. Make sure you have a proper routine or workout plan. Less processed foods, mire whole foods
@futureshock7425Ай бұрын
Trek shut him up great company to do business with lol
@martinsowkowski8957Ай бұрын
Lance was a huge bully
@frankmoran167Ай бұрын
Gp5000 last me 10,000km, but I'm 60kg
@will2048Ай бұрын
What did Merckx say.... Ride a bike. Ride a bike. Ride a bike.
@brunohighflyerАй бұрын
This chats with the pro coaches are amazing work! Tks!
@richardmiddleton7770Ай бұрын
Another win for zone 2 training! It doesn't make you tired (well, it does, but in a good way and helps you sleep at night). You can also eat normally and don't have to worry about fueling on the bike unless going beyond 2 hours, even then, just take a couple of bananas or stop at a cafe!
@jdyches37Ай бұрын
i actually enjoy that my coach doesn't prescribe the "netflix" workouts. plenty of z2 and interval days are generally just 'warm up-interval portion-cool down.' i've added 25w on my ftp in 2 years and hit 1m, 5m, and 20m PR's this year. keep it simple, stupid 😛
Ай бұрын
Il faut surtout que ces gens quittent le cyclisme car ils encouragent le dopage.
@burnsideisbackАй бұрын
Yeah I'm always tired because I work my nuts off in the off-season for semi-serviceable cat 1/2 results. Cyclings fking hard, it's tiring as fk.
@frienduro24Ай бұрын
Cranks should be 20% of your inseam
@jessejamesvАй бұрын
Says God? You?
@frienduro24Ай бұрын
@ Its been the norm for years. Also just heard it on Dylan Johnson’s latest vid. 165mm cranks won’t work for every sized rider. The bike industry is putting too large of cranks on bikes in general
@johny17041968Ай бұрын
Vasilis is the best ! Keep going !!
@cammoscottАй бұрын
Great summary. Thanks
@markflolid5930Ай бұрын
I really object to your outrageous presentation. Either present something objective , just don’t drag the man down because it gets you views.
@tomrodriguez9052Ай бұрын
Pidcock is 5'7" and Pogacar is 5'9", 650mm cranks are probably the right size for their height. I'm 6ft tall and currently using 172.5mm cranks and feel fine with them. I really think that rider size needs to be considered in this equation, more so than just 165mm cranks make you faster.
@christianCarbstrong27 күн бұрын
Height has nothing to do with inseam. I'm 5'8 and have the inseam of a 6 foot male. Same with pogacar, same with Jonas. Shorter cranks have to do with hip angle and power output. I run 160mm. I'm putting out my best numbers yet.
@tomrodriguez905226 күн бұрын
@@christianCarbstrong The slight flaw in your thinking is, we are not all built the same, you are using the same logic as the bike companies use, putting the same cranks on all bikes. How do you come to the conclusion that Pogacar has the same legs as a 6" man? If you look at his saddle hight, it's 737mm, with shorter cranks which should put the saddle even higher. I'm 6 ft and ride 172.5 cranks and my saddle hight is 760mm. There in more to it than just saying inseam has nothing to do with it and then making up something about short people with super long legs...