Very nice video and useful advices! If I can suggest, in my experience I’ve found very helpful, when possible, to submit the drawing to your final customer (either internal or external) for review. As customer I mean for example a machining, assembling or dimensional quality check responsible. It always helped learning something new, creating a relationship of mutual respect with my production colleagues and, last but not least, avoiding poor figures! 😅 Thanks again!
@JetIgniter2k22 күн бұрын
In 7.5 minutes, I already know more than the ME I work with.
@josemarquez863 күн бұрын
To anybody who watching this, if you're a young buck and you want to be into the trades? As a mechanical designer engineer it's the best feeling 11 years experience. Also a little hint , draw like a machines also asme & iso standards! And never be afraid to step on toes! (Tread lightly)
@alecpokrandt332213 күн бұрын
I miss your uploads, I literally rewatch your videos😭
@Te4mUp14 күн бұрын
Wait how did you get the raw data with more than 4 decimal places?! Are you saying if my stock to leave of .0001" is not enough but .0002" is too much I can use my CAM software to add stock to leave of .000155"?!
@Te4mUp14 күн бұрын
Wait Fusion only outputs values to 4 decimal places, I'd need a new post processor... But that's insane I need to know how you got the raw data like that please
@anakin.gulliver17 күн бұрын
your videos are too good
@joro860423 күн бұрын
Good refresher. Cleared up some stuff too. Thanks.
@joro860423 күн бұрын
great info. Made tons of parts and drawings and still learned something.
@richardchao3232Ай бұрын
Hello Tarkka, great video! Do you happen to have the pdf of the "Common Materials and Specifications" that begins showing at 8:15?
@logickedmazimoon6001Ай бұрын
yeah in my experience, machinists working out of their garage will look at GD&T and say "just give me the damn tolerance"
@davidboatman8838Ай бұрын
Very Useful indeed. HELP; Can someone confirm that 85% of the gland fill is 85% of the circumference of the cross section of O=ring, so if the O-ring is 1mm cross section then you add 0.85mm above and below for T O- rings?
@CapsCtrlАй бұрын
damn amazing video
@pandrevkoАй бұрын
good stuff.
@lilucy-ge5lgАй бұрын
Hello, do you need a machine to make fasteners?
@lilucy-ge5lgАй бұрын
Hello, do you need a machine to make fasteners? Please contact me.
@lilucy-ge5lgАй бұрын
Hello, do you need a machine to make fasteners? Please contact me.
@lilucy-ge5lgАй бұрын
Hello, do you need a machine to make fasteners? Please contact me.
@mr.cheese24992 ай бұрын
One thing to note is that companies may not follow some typical drawing formats. At my work we don’t use balloons and instead opt for calling parts out on the face of the drawing. We also use the same block format on all pages. This helps keep the page flipping down and if needed separate pages.
@CaptainFalcon922 ай бұрын
Man : clear and loud. Women: *hush hush ssuh sssssuhh are you unconfortable enougsshhh?"
@hhjhj3933 ай бұрын
Holy moly I just learned so much about bolts. 🤯
@srikanthkmr233 ай бұрын
Excellent
@isverque743 ай бұрын
Oring's e parbac
@jackroman88213 ай бұрын
Absolutely excellent video, great use of examples and explanations. Thank you!
@isverque743 ай бұрын
Tem tabela PARKER para escolha de Oring's e dimensões de canais com parbac ou sem parbac,tudo muito fácil. 4:35
@Altruistic-Viking3 ай бұрын
Still using bananas for measuring not even accounting for temperature difference 🤦🏼♂️
@thisissoeasy4 ай бұрын
Great presentation! Thank you!
@lucianojunior95065 ай бұрын
Excelent video!
@frankish53145 ай бұрын
Very nice. I have an application where my static rod will be between two sizes. I.e a 113 Buna N O ring will have a 9% stretch but a 114 will have about 0.5%. The 113 feels about right using a 50 durometer i.e soft O ring. The application will run at up to 230F. I think a 113/50 is about the best choice in this application.
@Mprikiman5 ай бұрын
Great Video!
@JohnDoe-le1cu5 ай бұрын
This is a really great video. A few years ago, I had to design a master cylinder and it took weeks of going through textbooks to finally land on the lifersaver that was the Parker handbook. (Not an ad) Pretty much everything important was covered here and if you need more information you know the terms to look up.
@VinceMaguire-w5w6 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@siskel63926 ай бұрын
4:52 A whole damn box with paper inside for one freaking fastener.
@wormball6 ай бұрын
название уровня бог
@CelestialxPanda6 ай бұрын
Fuckn annoying American standard video . The whole world follows iso standard . So make an iso video . Stupid American fkups. Follow the whole world . You aren't special.
@VHSGUY_ANALOGCOMPANY6 ай бұрын
Can you remaster the found one
@孙小圣-d8u6 ай бұрын
查看并思考如何对高品质图纸的零件实施加工和检测是一种享受!
@greglaroche17536 ай бұрын
Very interesting. I’m subscribed and look forward to watching more videos from you.
@sohampimpale43037 ай бұрын
can you please help me with name of the book shown in the video.
@Skunkhunt_427 ай бұрын
Thanks for sucha useful, no frills, no bs vid
@ordinarypinoyreview18437 ай бұрын
I am using a 12mm bolt and nut for the installation of tow hitch receiver for my bike rack. Is it not a good idea to use 14mm washer on a 12mm bolt? What is that 2mm internal clearance going to cause? 14mm washer is what's currently available, so i used it. Should I remove and replace it with a 12mm instead?
@johngaver11047 ай бұрын
This was very helpful. Thanks
@tuongtrinh49827 ай бұрын
what is the name of the lubricant?
@sajadfilabi95767 ай бұрын
super
@daniel-c3t9i7 ай бұрын
I'm glad they made these videos quiet enough so my engineer leads won't hear what I'm doing. Great content, thank you!
@1marcelfilms8 ай бұрын
If you stretch an o ring, the diameter shrinks but what if you compensate for this by getting bigger CS ?? is that possible
@우미-v8l8 ай бұрын
9:48 11:28
@dwaynesykes6948 ай бұрын
Sure, a manual tool will provide a "more accurate" measurement "faster" than a CMM that can run a program with no operator intervention and is accurate to 6 decimal places... keep on telling yourself that. Are manual metrology tools valuable? Absolutely. For one-offs and prototypes, or spot-checking features, there's absolutely value. For production runs, even short runs at a job shop, the CMM is king if the shop can afford one.
@brandons91386 ай бұрын
CT scanners are better.
@dwaynesykes6946 ай бұрын
@@brandons9138 sure... if you're the bank financing them. Outside of some niche aerospace and semiconductor applications, industrial CT scanning just isn't economically viable.
@brandons91386 ай бұрын
@@dwaynesykes694 My shop is waiting on getting ours. With the volume of parts we ship and the AQL levels our customer demands CMMs are just too slow.
@brownie21st8 ай бұрын
Thank you guys so much for the free documents❤❤
@vincentli20908 ай бұрын
this video contains more than my 7 years in school