2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@NGMonocrom 5 күн бұрын
Honestly, my Titanium case RIDGE watch (yes, same company that makes that awful RIDGE wallet) looks better than this Tudor, for a fraction of the price. You look at both their dials and you can see both are inspired by the Rolex Explorer. Also, if Tudor wanted to commemorate that event from 70 years ago.... Why didn't they create a modern-day re-issue of the Oyster Prince, instead? Seems more like a bit of flimsy marketing tie-in.
@oletoft4573 8 күн бұрын
terrible pronunciation. Thumbs down. Get better narrator
@smartcar8 9 күн бұрын
Great video!
@projectx5154 15 күн бұрын
The perfect g shock watch. And it costs 300$... of course. Casio really can't get over themselves. They create everything people are asking for and then make it either expensive or limited edition. Why this watch costs 3 times the price of the regular gw 5610 is beyond me. Just make the 5610 with stealthy look _and_ positive display and mark it at 120$ how hard is that???
@chrisw7188 18 күн бұрын
the heritage of a company from the war makes it that much cooler
@TheZanshen 26 күн бұрын
Cwc gs sapphire. Built to British military specifications but with 200m ,sapphire crystal. Same as the G10 but better built.
@TheFunkytownGotcha Ай бұрын
yeah, not sure i could convivence myself to pay 3 times the price for a very slightly heavier version of the 5610. the watch itself is exactly the same aside from a metal in the bezel giving it a little weight.
@luisb7120 Ай бұрын
Congrats!
@BuckNaked2k Ай бұрын
To make this a good buy, you can sell one or both of the Seichu straps on the secondary. They fetch $$$
@thetruthonlyone Ай бұрын
I have the gmw-b5000 and I don’t have that issue with the viewing angle
@danielcooke9974 Ай бұрын
It's one of the most perfect watches you can get. Adjustable volume for the alarm and it will be even better
@blakris9382 Ай бұрын
can we install the saphir caseback of the "c65 dune" on this c65 sandhurst?
@CesareRazzi Ай бұрын
It's a pretty watch
@kenamaro3942 2 ай бұрын
My friend got one of these last week. He thought it was counterfeit, the bezel and chapter ring markers all lined up..
@BuckNaked2k 3 күн бұрын
I see what you did there. 😉
@danmarly5173 2 ай бұрын
belle qualité d'images ! 🤗 si tu peux me dire ce que tu as utilisé ? par curiosité..
@patsonti1703 2 ай бұрын
Got my 5000u four days ago. Couldn't be happier.
@TheZanshen 2 ай бұрын
Seiko king turtle blows this away. In my opinion
@kennethchia4517 2 ай бұрын
Ok 3d lume plot like the bb pro makes sense. I agree
@henrymach 2 ай бұрын
Your picks are all small. Anything smaller than 40 mm looks like a toy watch in my wrist
@Michael-yx2un 2 ай бұрын
You have to embrace the watch for what it is. A tool watch, discreet, not in the way of getting physical activities done. If that's not for you then don't blame the companies for getting the watches right by making them small.
@cicirelliwrites 2 ай бұрын
A question for owners out there. I know the bracelet, at the clasp, has one rigid link which, I have heard, may make the bracelet jut out from your wrist, if your wrists are on the smaller side. Have you noticed this? My wrist is about 6.5"
@Scan_Speak 2 ай бұрын
Waiting for delivery (-:
@reynaldoflores4522 3 ай бұрын
Don't forget to mention the Bulova Hack.
@jhonprince8621 3 ай бұрын
BB36 all day all night🔥🔥🔥
@Eayala17 3 ай бұрын
Whats the materil of the bezel made out of?
@Tickerman 3 ай бұрын
I actually agree with Hamilton. Mineral crystal was the better choice for this watch than sapphire. Put this watch next to the Khaki Field Mechanical and you’ll see the difference in clarity. With black dials sapphire sucks. It washes out the color of the dial and is heavily reflective. One shouldn’t assume that sapphire is ALWAYS the best choice for a watch. It isn’t.
@김범준-e1t6g 3 ай бұрын
용두(크라운)가 너무 튀어나왔다. 아쉽다
@w5monkey 3 ай бұрын
"seen combat" no way I would would put that watch in harm.. those were definitely saved for dress and pub night lol
@shariyidioto723 3 ай бұрын
5610U + "Premium" = GW-5000U And you end up paying twice as much.
@richardkent2200 3 ай бұрын
Bremont Argonaut ?
@scottt.4596 3 ай бұрын
Just curious. Did you ever purchase a 36mm Explorer? Great content! Cheers 🍻
@generico896 3 ай бұрын
Ad
@stevehenrytagami4709 4 ай бұрын
It's a 700 dollar watch . You may as well go Watch dives or Steel dive and save 1130 USD
@CNAD111 4 ай бұрын
Is this JF or ER or CR ?
@mwboost 3 ай бұрын
All the same🤷🏻♂️,but most are JF for this model.
@FullTekAuto 4 ай бұрын
I love the led lights on the gshocks . They have this liminal like ethereal white glow to it I like. Hard to describe but it’s dreamy looking…
@FullTekAuto 4 ай бұрын
This is the grandson of the famous Hero G-Shock. The gshocks in the 80’s had screw back metal cases just as this does…
@GKK1963 4 ай бұрын
Bought my Tudor BB36 Black dial in 2022 after seeing it at the AD. The Piano Black Dial looked elegant and simple. I wear this watch everyday from mowing the lawn to swimming in the ocean and this is my most favorite watch ever! The BB36 is a very understated watch! 😊
@nassozeebo 4 ай бұрын
I dont agree that analog watches are easier to read at angles. If im riding my bike to the train station with my 5610u on my wrist, I can glance at the watch for a second and know the exact minute and second, without lifting my hands from the handlebar. I would not do that with any of my analog watches. I would usually not be able to tell 08:42 and 08:44 apart with certainty or know the minute and seconds with confidence, with just a glance, without lifting my hands from the handlebar. I love both my analog and digital watches, but I cant really think of many real life situations where the time is more readable/faster to read on my analogs compared to my 5610u.
@drazenbabich 4 ай бұрын
Still patiently awaiting a true to OG 6105-8000 non-prospex reissue. When it happens (and one day it will), it will break the Internet.
@bartekgierczynski 4 ай бұрын
It's nice, but £100 too expensive 😞
@bekiminecraft4293 4 ай бұрын
Sorry man but what a blunder to scratch it like that for a video
@Robert-vw3od 4 ай бұрын
It’s a field watch, it’s not a dress watch it’s not a diver. It’s a very simple field watch
@minionofgozer7414 4 ай бұрын
I bought this as my last, and only, luxury watch. It's my daily wear now, I don't have anything else as I sold them all. It's been pretty much flawless, tells the right time all the time and the bezel sits perfectly well in the right position when set. I get compliments on it as well. The only thing I can nitpick is as follows: The strap it comes with tends to 'un-clasp' itself from time to time from the metal Seiko slide clasp. You have to set that with a little extra strap hanging out, which can catch on clothing or anything near your wrist. So I can see why people put these models on natos or some other after market strap. The Seiko issued strap wears well, looks nice but its just a little flawed as all.
@01Criste 4 ай бұрын
Clicky bezel?
@HappyGuy11 4 ай бұрын
I just wanted to raise a concern that I haven't seen discussed anywhere on the Internet. In my opinion competent field watches must have (at least) a date complication and a day-date complication is even better. When away from civilization it is easy to lose track of the day and date. This could be crucial if you are supposed to meet someone for resupply or extraction (for example). Some might argue that this information can be retrieved from a cell phone, but then so can the time and cell phones are notorious for their short battery life.
@Ruka-f7k 4 ай бұрын
Just draw a mark everytime the sun rise, it is truly not that hard
@davestagner 3 ай бұрын
The WWII “Dirty Dozen” spec didn’t include a date complication, and it’s hard to call what the British army gave its troops in WWII anything other than “field watch”. Of course, great field watches are available both with and without date complications. I prefer to not have one myself… if I really need the date, I’ll use my phone, and if I’m in a situation where my phone has died and I’m completely outside of civilization for days enough to lose track of what day it is, knowing the correct date is probably the least of my worries!
@HappyGuy11 3 ай бұрын
@@davestagner Thanks for your comment. The Dirty Dozen watch specification was issued in 1945, the same year that Rolex released the first self-changing date complication, so it is understandable that those responsible for the program would think that a self-changing date complication would be a "bridge too far." However, fast-forward 79 years and self-changing date complications are provided on most affordable watches, so there's no reason for us to confine ourselves to pre-1945 technology in choosing an optimum field watch. I like the symmetry of no-date dials as much as anyone, but I prefer a date complication for both field and travel watches (which have similar requirements).
@davestagner 3 ай бұрын
@@HappyGuy11 Sure, I can see that! Your historic reasoning makes sense. Still, though, I feel a date complication on a field watch is a preference, not a requirement (just as a 4pm crown is a strong preference for me, but absolutely not a requirement).
@Tubercollosal 3 ай бұрын
Wouldn't this mean a watch like G-Shock GW9400 Rangeman a superior choice to mechanical watch?
@raziel3099 4 ай бұрын
the 5610U is closer to the original with updated features though.
@some_randomninja 4 ай бұрын
Is it completely made in Japan
@jemandthemystery 4 ай бұрын
Concerns about the glass some have expressed here is a non-issue in practice. I use mine in demanding situations all the time over the last year and a half and similarly screened Casio squares before that and they are all fine. The only reason this guy scratched his is because he intentionally scrubbed it into grit face down(!) (6:40) Who does that in the real world? Again, it’s a non-issue.
@Barnaby_bo 4 ай бұрын
My next watch.
@gannon5409 4 ай бұрын
Great review. You can get aftermarket gorilla glass which perfectly covers the acrylic. Crystal. I bought a pack of three. They're fantastic and don't inhibit the solar cell whatsoever!
@6DoctorJ 4 ай бұрын
Great Review!