You need to do a build video. I'd like to see you wind the coil and hook up the system in real time

❤❤❤❤H😢😢w to build that small LED Wireless receiver??? Tutorial please. Also teach how to build your Tesla coil with efficiency 😊😊😊 range

Teach us how to make this😢😢😢❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉

hello I have a question about ferrite rod type 77 what materials does the rod consist of and does it have magnetic or non-magnetic properties....?

the battery charges or goes back to higher volt wgen you remove the load ... .. he should put a load in both ways ... with with ground connected and without ground and complet of the system but no need to explain this cause they way he is explaining negative resistance really works... i am doing test in don smith device and kapanadze this thing works and even better using don smith

Try to Ground 1terminal (of the wireless led reciever) instead holding it with your hand as body ground if it still works? on the other video

Yes, you've stated it correctly. You could harness exactly the amount of energy you mentioned, and if you're clever, potentially even indefinitely. However, as you noted, energy is neither created nor destroyed; it requires an external source. The source you're using to cycle energy will eventually run out. But since you're familiar with Nikola Tesla's patents, you understand how to integrate that energy into your system. Here are some ideas you might want to consider: Start by examining how you're harnessing energy to light that light bulb-that should be your first clue. Now, you'll need to really understand how to use MOSFETs in your circuit to draw minimal current, amplify it, and then channel it into your batteries, which you're already doing. If you're unsure how to proceed, review Nikola Tesla's patents. If you still need help, feel free to drop me an email. Remember these three famous words: energy, vibration, and frequency. If you can't create or destroy energy, but you have these three keys to draw upon, then you understand how to transfer energy from one state to another and capture the excess through the magnetic or electromagnetic separation in the system.

I think a guy named john hutchinson did the crystal cells first.

I don't know who is deleting my comments I wrote for the umpteenth time under your videos and someone is deleting You say to increase the 30 k resistor to a larger one Something is wrong with such a high resistance in the circuit there is no current ampere Here is an example 10v / 30k = 333.33 µA With an induction of 300uh and 1 nf I don't understand your circuit For me you have too much resistance At 1 ohm it is 10 A in the circuit on the coil Where am I wrong here in this calculation and understanding of this circuit? As you can see there is a high resistance in the circuit So why do the bulbs light up and there is energy in the resonance? Although in your case it draws less ampere at the input if there was a lower resistance like 30 k ohm

I want to ask if I have to have two types of wire or can I use 2 mm wire for the secondary and primary coils?

Hey Bro, How can you see this added to a drone, would it still work ? Could you hang a ground wire from it, without in needing to touch ground?

I wish you tested a drill, a TV, a stove and so on. Nobody is going to that😢😢 level why? U already have the answer. ❤❤😊 PLEASE DO A TUTORIAL ON HOW TO BUILD THAT RECEIVER STEP BY STEP WITH CLEAR INSTRUCTIONS FOR STARTERS LIKE US. M IN AFRICA. ALREADY BUILDING SOMETHING WIRELESS AND WANT TO COPY THIS SETUP FOR BIGGER GENERATOR 😊😊😊😊❤❤❤

❤😅😊😊

❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊🎉🎉

What kills me is some on YT say it only work for them because they have special materials only they have lol. The ringer is just an oscillator and nothing more or mysterious! No self run being showed here. I have built the ranger one like yours fully tuned to resonate around 890khz. NO OU!!!

If you cant self run, then you don't have OU.

Run it on a condenser and Loop the dc back into the run cap!

Don Smith gen. : kzbin.info/www/bejne/mXWQdICCd5xliMk kzbin.info/www/bejne/qWbJdKeMhdmshs0 kzbin.info/www/bejne/onPRaKGXnJV9gc0 kzbin.info/www/bejne/jmS2pqyLq6-KpNk kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5y0ZHilebSKgck

This is nice, BUT…. I was ordering a product 8 month ago! How you can upload video and still no reply or answers from you to any emails? Is it a scam? I already paid for the procut and sent you emails to your proton Email with the order number. please check, its been 8 months already, if no answer in the coming days, unfortunately I will not have a choice to sue you and ask all my Petreon money back.

❤

Hello @MTech. I was ordering a product 8 month ago. no reply or answers from you yet. Is it a scam? I already paid for the procut and sent you emails with the order number. please check. thank you.

You why deleted my comment?

seems to me one could tap the radiant energy to charge more primary source batteries which would be switched over to when the primary gets low... running forever...

Do you have a luxmeter to compare the light production straight from the net and with your system?

That's awesome Mel. Thank you for sharing.

Just because you have a 40watt 'rated' load connected does not mean it is 'consuming' 40watts. Not necessarily applying to your demonstration - just general information.

Thanks for sharing. God bless you. 🙏 Maybe you can test how much power you can extract with more external coils. Input power vs. Output power. 😊👍

just because the reactance is greater than the stimulating source does not mean you are capturing it back into the system . The reactance is in opposite polarity to your stimulation source there for your circuit running the reactance and all of its component's are not oriented for the reactance . Bedini taught me this threw replication of his Bedini SG

18:00 Thats due to the chemical efficiency of the battery , according to John BEdini. I also agree. .. If its not chemical and its material storage like graphene or lead , then in the same token as the chemic. Think of an inductor and its inductive reactance when you think of the lead plates of a standard battery. l The reactance is greater than the stimulation source

very basic circuit with very few parts but not so easy to see how the switching operates the loop of the flyback.

MTECH , if your interested in a circuit that loops flyback between two coils and two batteries LMK , its on my channel and I am here to answer questions regarding the circuit . Its a Bedini SG modification.. The concept in eliminating the need to swap the batteries is one of switching and i am sure you will not "get it" so ask me questions as it took me a while ;e to "get it" even though its my own circuit .. I know its weird but true

❤

Is it more efficient than Tesla coil?

what should be voltage output of L2 coil to best charging effect? My output voltage from L2 11 volt I think it too low and I have reduce woundd of L1 is it correct?

Dear friend can you tell ? When I run circuit without resistanse network simply like laser saber it consume 2 amps witout load, but with resistanse network consumption increases to more than 3 amps, what can be cause?

DO NOT GET ME WRONG. I TOTALY BELIEVE YYYYOU. BUT I DO NOT KNOW YYOU.

SO MUCH JARGON BUT NO EVIDENCE.

INCREDIBLE WIRELESS FREE ENERGY. YYYEAH BUT WHERE IS THE GRAVYY.

MATE FAIR ENOUGH, YOU HAVE THE MAGIC FREE ENERGY. BUT WHY DON,T YOU PROVE IT. WITH A LOOP SYSTEM.

Real Nice Bro! It looks like the device stimulates the Chi field in a large area. Did you try adding several ground wires to see how far out you can get that effect?Or if it adds to the system? To answer your question .Why it works on metal parts? you are aware Orgonite works like a big capacitor? Earth/Ground is made from natural Orgonite. The metal particles attract and reflect chi/orgone, the organic particles attract and hold. Your device saturates the naturally existing ground Orgonite. Then it overflows with scalar frequencies ,which any metal parts close to the device and earth, will affect.(Attracts and reflects) If your device could be exactly tuned to output the Tesla Violet wand frequency, your device would also become a powerful area effect healing machine!

This may not have been explained to you before. I don't know, I've never looked at the forums where people are building these devices or looked at Teslas patents to know what people are talking about in regards to a ringer. I still understand what's happening here. A coil that is powered makes an electromagnetic field. Wind a wire around a nail and connect it to that SLA battery and you've made an electromagnet. When the coil loses power, the magnetic field collapses. This makes a short pulse of voltage and current or back EMF (bEMF). You are collecting this bEMF. That's where the over unity can happen. The schotky diodes are rectifying that pulse into DC which you can then apply to the battery or some other load. When you have no load, you've noticed that your wireless circuit tester goes crazy. All that bEMF is just floating around the ringer. It's going to be pretty high voltage...like 300 to 1000 volts under no load. Whatever the load is will pull down the raw bEMF voltage to something more reasonable...like you see on your DMM when you charged the second SLA battery. If you've ever looked at a Bedini motor, it uses the same principals, but also has a mechanical aspect. The transistor is powering and cutting power to the ringer coils over and over again making many bEMF pulses. Your ringer has a resonant frequency as you already know. The frequency of the switching of the transistor directly effects the efficiency you will get from the ringer. It may be you are dead on, a little off or way off at getting the most potential bEMF possible. It may be that the transistor is switching too fast or too slow. An o-scope will help with this. Right now, you don't know. BTW...that magnet you said helps "tune" the ringer coil...that's effecting the magnetic feild around the ringer. Its altering its resonant frequency a little. *** Do you have magnetic viewing film? This will show you what the magnetic field around anything looks like. I think you'll find that quite interesting to see when the ringer is operating. *** BTW, a ferite core is not the best option. They have ceramic and iron powder baked together into a ring or bar. The iron content isn't very high. Laminations like used in motors or transformers are much higher iron content and still provide the electrical isolation between iron atoms needed to limit eddy current losses. something else to consider for better performance! *** OK! 2 long ass comments in your video. Pretty sure I gave you a ton of stuff to think about!

hi man hello I remember that in an earlier video, you made a device with a second magnetic rod as a coil and magnetic rod wound in the same way as the L3 coil to collect more ether energy. But recently you no longer use this method. My idea is, just like your demonstration in this video, when there is a second magnet with a similar winding method close to the first magnet or a wire that is wound several times in the circuit, the light on the second magnet will light up. The input ammeter pointer has not become larger, so I believe that under the same input power, the way to increase the output power is to continue to add the second and third magnetic rods. The fourth magnetic rod. The fifth magnetic rod. . . . . Connect it in parallel or series and then connect it to the second battery to charge it. In this way, more output power can be obtained while the input power remains unchanged. The following is my experimental observation. If the second magnetic rod is placed in different directions, the current will be completely different. The difference is about 1-3 times (middle tap, when winding forward and reverse). The coil winding of the second magnetic rod is different from that of the first. The L3 method of the magnetic rod is the same, but the second magnetic rod must be placed in the opposite direction to the first magnetic rod to achieve the maximum current. This circuit is a mini version of Tesla's wireless power transmission. When the ether energy appears in the surrounding space, the only thing left is how to collect this energy more effectively. Personal opinion~Thank you for your continued work~God bless you.

Several things... 1. Looks like your carbon resistors are darkening from heat. You currently have 10w resistors, 3 in parallel. If you go with a higher resistance and more in parallel to get the same resistance you will share the current through them more and make less heat in any one resistor. 2. Your Resistor/Capacitor to earth ground is an RC network. L is inductor and you don't have that. There is always some amount of inductance in any form of conductor, but that's pretty small in this application. It's an RC network. 3. You need at least 3 DC watt meters so you can show voltage and current from your source battery, voltage and current to your charging battery and voltage and current to your inverter. I'd add a 4th one for sensing current at your ground wire too. This one will tell you wireless power. A 4th 110v AC wall plug in watt meter would be great to plug into your inverter so you can see light bulb load. The watt meter on the DC side of the inverter will show some wattage as well. The difference between the wattage to the bulbs and DC watts is the losses of the inverter. Lots of watt meters also show amp/hours and watt/hours so you can see power used and delivered over time. The idea here is to have proof that you are over unity or at least where the current is going and getting used. Lots and lots of devices are claimed to be over unity, but people fail to show proof. I'm not saying it isn't, just that you don't know if it is or isn't until you can prove it. 3a. Look this up on amazon: "Battery Monitor Hall Sensor Coulomb Tester DC 9~100v 100A/400A Digital Voltmeter Ammeter Battery Capacity" Get 3 or 4 of the 100a version. They won't interfere with the live circuits under test since they are electrically isolated. They sense current by the the induced magnetic field created on a wire when current flows in it. 4. I still want to see you run an incandescent bulb wireless. Tesla did it! He didn't have LEDs back then. 5. Still want to see an o-scope reading across the RC network. On the center tap of the ringer coil to ground would be very good too. You can buy a used oscilloscope on ebay for less than $100. 6. This is pretty low current so far. The ringer coil will start heating up with too much load on it. Do you have a laser temp meter so you can check temps of your transistor, diodes, resistors and coil? This is probably why you went with 3 schotky diodes in parallel. One by itself was getting hot. 7. It would be good to put an o-scope on the transistor base to see what voltage and wave form is going to it. Your sense winding can be reduced a few turns to lower the voltage if you are driving the transistor base too hard. This will eventually burn it out. It may be you have too little base drive and can add a few turns. The transistor is acting as an amplifier...on/off/on/off. You want it biased as fully on as possible so it's collector to emitter junction resistance is as low as possible. You also don't want it turned on too much so that it distorts the wave form made at the base. You won't know any of this without an oscilloscope. 8. Heat = losses...try to find them and eliminate them. 9. Transistors are a lot like legos. Many can work to do the same job. Get on mouser or digikey, look up the datasheet for the one you have. Now use their transistor tools to find one with the lowest emitter to collector resistance and more voltage and current. This is less losses and untapped capability for your ringer! *** I'm not criticizing what you've done so far...far from it! Just want you to have credibility and measurable proof. Keep going with this! Don't let the debunkers tell you it's impossible so you quit!!! Best people to do this sort of thing are people that are not "too educated" and dismissive of so called "non-standard possibilities"! I don't care if you sub to my youtube channel or not, just look at a few of my latest videos so you have some idea who I am. After that, if you want to talk about what you are doing with somebody that does electronics, hit me up on Facebook: Richard Gumfaw.