10 pro tutorials most Blender artists haven't seen

[@robinsquares]

Thumbnail is from Blender Studio! I go more into that specific video series on Patreon 👉 www.patreon.com/posts/hidden-gems-2-2-113304572

[@ArtPomelo]

Great tips and finds but hiding the Pixar series is such a bummer.

[@robinsquares]

The Patreon has a free trial! Go and get your Pixar series!

[@coldway]

@ArtPomelo It's the one you can find on the Khan Academy. And yeah, it's a low blow to hide informations under a pay wall, even if there's a free trial.

[@KrossX]

Easy to find though, now that you know it's there. First result on Google.

[@JosiahBout]

@@coldway its a low blow to complain about a tiny amount of non-financial effort asked of you for a completely free video that took a lot of effort to put together

[@coldway]

@@JosiahBout It's free for the time being, next week it probably won't be free anymore. It also took a lot of effort from the Khan Academy and the Pixar Team to put togheter the free couse, if you think it's fair to gatekeep this info behind a paywall then I don't know what to tell you... you do you.

[@lucasdmok]

Google : Pixar In a Box

[@issonkiporto]

You re the best

[@DarrenMostyn]

Love being mentioned in this video. Thank You - all the best, Darren.

[@LumzX]

16:12 It actually isn't the course is called Pixar in a Box

[@Jfaups08]

What’s better than an informative video with quality production? One that provides various outside sources for more informative content with quality production.

[@davidcsakvari762]

The hbitproject is my favorite youtube channel in blender modeling topic. Nondesctructive, lots of geonodes, procedural materials and very good at teaching the right approach for modeling. Small channel, but deserves attention

[@AaronXCVI]

Great video

[@janedoe61926]

I was waiting for the punchline with the whole I'm only telling you about the Pixar course on my patreon But it wasn't a joke...

[@Mattfication]

Man, the way you showed not only what are those great tutorials, but snippets to show what you are talking about is brilliant. Love your sincerity and the lengths you go to, by providing easy access to everything, except the Pixar thing ehm ehm.. :D But yeah, I'm subbing, this is great.

[@fergadelics]

That Pixar color fellow has the inspirational thing going on pretty well. Those 4-5 color/ light videos are just universally cool

[@cowboi459]

Sick! Thanks for sharing great stuff!

[@anesthesis7008]

I'm trying to get that gradient you're talking about at 6:30 but when I divide my value i don't get the same gradient, and when i run it through a modulo (floored or truncated) i don't get any wave either. I'm curious if you'd share your set up for that spread because that is something i've been trying to do for a long time ! :)

[@yoman4802]

Wow the bit at 11:16 cracked me up *hard* Also I wish amongst other things, this video makes me wish these things were taught in ground school. Some of them are naturally a bit advanced, but my impression is that much of it is fundamental techniques that are then built upon. What child doesn't love to play with sounds or llighting for example? Either way thanks for another great vid

[@Arkvis10]

Bruh .....u don't know about erindale channel, should definitely be on the list for sure. The guy explains geometry nodes the most detailed way, not perfect yet but the best one yet out there!

[@xanzuls]

Entagma too. IMO they do even more advanced stuff with maths.

[@Arkvis10]

@@xanzuls oh I wasn't aware of them, thanks for letting us know✌️!

[@AMNESIASTUDI0S]

what an amazing video, soooooooo valuable. Thank you!!

[@violettracey]

Thank you!

[@tenXXIII]

excellent info on this video, its just those professional critiques (photo) that are cringe beyond comprehension but i get your point.... i used to be passionate about photography and every photo club/exhibit had those eternal critics who've done nothing their whole life, yet would rate a tree in the snow with a 4 (no, its not michael kenna)

[@andreybagrichuk5365]

Fantastic one, thank you for share. Amazingly prepared 🔥

[@beefan1596]

Very impressive model at 0:00

[@fergadelics]

I got the trial for the sneaky link. You need more posts before I do a monthly but I’ll be back. I like supporting people there. Thanks for everything!

[@wanisz_]

I like the format of the video

[@Axiasart]

Him: skip one starbucks and you will have that money Me from a poor country: Never seen starbuck in my life

[@benmccarthy2568]

hooray my favorite video pt 2 and 30 seconds in one of my favorite channels Jeremy

[@ericmatthews9894]

"Pixar has free vids that you can't find, pay me, and I'll tell you how to find this FREE stuff." Kind of an Elon Musk thing to do.

[@omeizasanni]

Please make more of this concise version!

[@davidcapuzzo]

i like your animated title cards

[@Tomy_Yon]

That's weird. That number is the same as the amount of existing geometry nodes: 908 billion 😮

[@ludvigInLegendaryLands]

Great idea for a video!

[@Cts_ville]

Pixar,how could you!!!😢

[@cinzabreu]

how can someone watch 908 billion videos?

[@faustoart]

Hi Robin First, right now, your channel is top, top, so congratulations. I really apreciate what you are doing here, it's really great content. I have a question for you, or maybe a suggestion for a video. In 6:24 you are showing a reveal method, and it's really similar to an effect that I've developed for a comercial for one of my clients. Problem with blender is when you activate motion blur with that particles, it gets really crazy. There are fixes, related to the ID of the particles, but I have not found a PERFECT solution. Do you have some trick in your bag that can solve that?

[@robinsquares]

I've heard about that problem, but never experienced it myself. My particles get motion blur. If you're using Geometry Nodes, I'm guessing whatever graph you have doesn't respect sub-frame intervals. You probably know that Blender samples between whole frames to get motion blur. You can even look between frames yourself by enabling sub-frame scrubbing. If your node graph is "teleporting" particles from one frame to the next, they won't get motion blur. But if the math works with decimal numbers, and you could theoretically move it half a frame, then it should work. Try scrubbing between frames and see if your particles jump around or move smoothly. And don't hesitate to shoot me an email.

[@faustoart]

@@robinsquares Hi Robin! thank your for answering! The problem is a bit tricky. There is this video kzbin.info/www/bejne/nYTRiXV8iphmnsk that I think explains it very well, it's related with the ID of the particles. When you add a set of particles via geonodes, they work properly, but when you start killing them (with a delete geometry,(just to not have too many working together) they loose their original ID. So blender is not able to properly track the id of each particle, and the motion blur needs this ID to properly work. The solution is to manually add a random ID for each particle, but it's not an easy task when you have thousands of particles in the scene. Actually I found that this problem is true too with the particle system of blender. If you try to generate particles from a dynamic object (fimagine that you are generating particles from a cube, and you delete via geo nodes, or other method, one of the faces) you will loose the motion blur of the particles. It sounds like a very specific problem, but it's really a killer when you are working with particles for VFX for example.

[@VisualistAyush07]

Amazing

[@Dodo_di_dope]

Damnn!! Thank You! :))))

[@ScoutOW2]

I feel like you need a liiiittle bit more negative space, feels like you're right in my face!

[@notimportantstudio]

Have to say, love your video's but hiding the pixar playlist that is put out there for free behind a paywall of yourself even if its a free patreon tryout that becomes payed in a week is a bit of a D move tbh.

[@notimportantstudio]

thanks for the rest of the video tips though :) still appreciate the channel

[@robinsquares]

I obviously hit a nerve with that tease. Sorry about that. Truth is, there are ten more resources that I spent about thirty hours researching and putting together. Is it not okay for me to publish that research on Patreon?

[@notimportantstudio]

@@robinsquareshey of course man I agree that if you put so much effort in researching you should be rewarded. But for some reason a link to open sourced material put out there by a studio and other creators feels different. For example you selling your composite workflow file I completely get and I was buying it right away not because I need it but because I appreciated the effort and the creator. That allot of people react on this matter says something about how the community feels about this just saying. It feels a bit like gatekeeping. It’s just on the edge of it. Again didn’t want to completely judge you still liked your video and still like you as a creator but we don’t have to agree on everything to still be friends in life right :)

[@Carpe-Diem-gg1hg]

Hi robin

[@Benn25]

Was it... Andrew Kramer??

[@Wrongkalnoka]

Great tips but putting Blender in the title with showing so many channels that do not really have anything to do with blender is a bit misleading. It's more about editing and post production in general

[@robinsquares]

You're right. I got a bit lost in titling on this one. All fixed up!

[@avrazo5888]

🔥🔥🔥

[@TheoBlack-po2hw]

I forgot I cant like twice so I liked, unliked, and re-liked the video. Massive thanks! 💌

[@bvs1q]

Tutorials that use houdini zbrush and substance..

[@prodRegularDude]

zertoz doesnt teach though

[@chromeflowers]

The transitions are waaay to beautiful, it’s almost distracting

[@Nebulous6]

Teal and orange color grading in film is over-rated and (hopefully) a fad that'll go away sooner than later.

[@MichaelNichol]

are you telling me, you are over 8 million years old, to have watched 908,000,000,002 videos.... 908000000002 × 300 = 272,400,000,000,600 minutes [ avg 5 min video] 272400000000600 ÷ 60 = 4,540,000,000,010 seconds in a minute 4540000000010 ÷ 60 = 75,666,666,666.83333 minutes in an hour 75666666666.83333 ÷ 24 = 3,152,777,777.784722 hours in day 3152777777.784722 ÷ 365 = 8,637,747.336396499 days in a year So you are over 8 million years old I don't think so

[@robinsquares]

I'm older than I look

[@ROBOTRIX_eu]