Question Time Stamps for Quick Reference: 0:00 - Intro 1. 0:40 {Discussing Biblical “Contradictions”!} Can you please discuss some different Bible passages that appear to be contradictory? 2. 41:10 {Unnecessary Body Parts = Evolution?} I have a coworker that is an atheist. He said that there are parts of our bodies that are not necessary and that might prove evolution rather than a Creator. Any thoughts? 3. 48:11 {Is Salvation Sometimes Unfair?} One of my biggest issues is that you NEED to believe in Jesus to be saved. If someone is born in a Muslim country, they would have to sacrifice way more than the average westerner. How is that fair? 4. 53:53 {Historical Jesus & Manuscripts} How can we believe in a historical Jesus if the oldest manuscripts we have are from the second or third century? 5. 1:00:40 {Is Christianity the True Religion?} How do I know Christianity is right/true compared to other world religions? 6. 1:09:20 {Does God Make Mistakes?} I often hear the argument, “If God doesn't make mistakes when it comes to gender, then what about people with disabilities?" How would you respond? 7. 1:15:08 {Applying PSA on Earth?} If the doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement is just, would it be just for an earthly judge to impute the guilt of a murderer to an innocent volunteer and sentence the volunteer to death instead of the murderer? If not, why? 8. 1:18:30 {Joseph in Jesus’ Lineage?} Any idea why Matthew and Luke list Joesph’s genealogy when he’s not Jesus’ birth father? Does that mean Jesus’ lineage isn’t what it needs to be to fulfill prophecy? 9. 1:20:27 {Is there Really an Afterlife?} Why do Christians think there is an afterlife? Why not just look at death as a return to the quantum state, like before we were born? 10. 1:24:26 {Did God Create Cancer?} If God created everything, why did He create cancer? As a Christian mother, I still struggle with these sorts of questions. 11. 1:27:54 {The Best Argument for God} What do you think is the best evidence/argument there is for God? 12. 1:30:21 {Does Trusting First Invalidate our Faith?} If you have to believe first in order to experience the reality of Christianity, if the "proof" only comes alive when one chooses to trust it, isn't that "truth" make-believe? 13. 1:33:54 {Would a Good God make a Terrible Hell?} When Jesus said that for the person who would betray Him it would be better not to be born, I assume Hell is worse than non-existence. How does this match with a good God? 14. 1:35:58 {Unrepentant Heart - Still Saved by Faith?} If I believe in my heart that Jesus rose from the dead and trust in Him alone for salvation, why would God then send me to Hell for being actively gay? Am I not saved by my faith instead of my works? 15. 1:42:16 {Salvation in the OT} How were people saved in the Old Testament before Jesus? And if they were saved without believing in Jesus, then why did it change? 16. 1:46:11 {Why do Christians Ask for Forgiveness?} My question from a skeptic is, if you are already saved, why do you still ask for forgiveness for your sins? 17. 1:47:26 {Hypostatic Union - Contradictory?} Is Jesus being God and Man a contradiction? The Bible says that the Son doesn’t know the day or the hour of His coming. Can Jesus know (as God) and not know (as Man) at the same time? 18. 1:49:32 {Bible = Pure Fiction?} As a Christian, what is an appropriate answer to an atheist claiming that the Bible is pure fiction? 19. 1:55:48 {Mixed Messages in Scripture?} I lost my faith due to all the mixed messages in the Bible. For example, is salvation by faith alone like John 5: 24, or faith plus works like James 2? Why doesn’t this cause you to doubt? 20. 1:58:39 {Does the Concept of Sin Apply to God?} Is God holy and sinless? Can God do things which, if we did them, would be considered sin? One example is killing the firstborn of Egypt. Does the concept of sin (or being sinless) even APPLY to God? 21. 2:03:30 {How to Trust in Christ} I’m a Bible believing non-Christian that hurt himself by absorbing bad Charismatic teachings. I have always had trouble trusting and accepting Christ. How would one begin to as a skeptic?
@desireehelms80125 ай бұрын
Mike Winger is a false teacher 1st Corinthians 4 and 5 preaching and teaching can not be done with words of mans wisdom but in demonstration of the Spirit and of 3:45 3:46 power and Mike Winger does not have that but there are preachers who do
He is incapable, by their fruits you shall know them. What do you get, he doesn't know God. Have you ever read about Jesus doing what he does? Come on now>
@desireehelms80125 ай бұрын
@@Ironguy-gm6vf the word of God can not be taught by the enticing words of man's wisdom but by demonstration of God's power. Paul says it can't be done that way and Mike Winger is no expert he doesn't understand the word of God says
@desireehelms80125 ай бұрын
@@rebeccaczajor Mike Winger does not have any fruits of the Spirit. My Pastor has done many mighty works in the name of Jesus Christ some came in wheel chairs and left walking
@NMemone5 ай бұрын
Mike, as someone raised to be an atheist for whom this is all fairly new I LOVE that you did a skeptics edition! I've asked a lot of these questions. I cannot wait to delve into this!
@flowerpower36185 ай бұрын
Welcome
@desireehelms80125 ай бұрын
@@NMemone Mike does not know what he is talking about Paul said the word of God can't be taught out of intelect but by the demonstration of the holy Spirit and the original word of God was written in Hebrew and in Greek and Mike knows neither
@NMemone5 ай бұрын
@desireehelms8012 Which one are you fluent in? Hebrew or Koine Greek? Or both?
@calebleach79885 ай бұрын
@@desireehelms8012 Mike took seminary. I can guarantee you he knows some Greek and Hebrew. Also, who are you to judge his heart? Who are you to claim he is not teaching in the Spirit? Where is your evidence? Where is your proof of claim? Without evidence, you are doing exactly what we are called not to do, judging. Take the log out of your own eye before you go complaining about Mikes speck.
@MikeWinger5 ай бұрын
21 questions on episode 21 of the 10 question series. Now THERE'S a contradiction!
@sarahfaith3165 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@petergouvignon80485 ай бұрын
@@MikeWinger 1 christ is not going to return and set up a kingdom on earth 2 God is not going to destroy this planet and make another one 1Co 15:45-50 ISV 45 This, indeed, is what is written: “The first man, Adam, became a living being.” The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. 46 The spiritual does not come first, but the physical does, and then comes the spiritual. 47 The first man came from the dust of the earth; the second man came from heaven. 48 Those who are made of the dust are like the man from the dust; those who are heavenly are like the man who is from heaven. 49 Just as we have borne the likeness of the man who was made from dust, we will also bear the likeness of the man from heaven. 50 Brothers, this is what I mean: Mortal bodies cannot inherit the kingdom of God, and what decays cannot inherit what does not decay. 2Pe 3:7 ISV Now by that same word, the present heavens and earth have been reserved for fire and are being kept for the day when ungodly people will be judged and destroyed.
@seaglass.jen865 ай бұрын
And it was an accident, wasn’t it?? Way to go Sarah!
@sarahfaith3165 ай бұрын
@@seaglass.jen86 Haha! I needed 1 more for the list but 2 really grabbed my heart. Normally in that situation I’d make the tough decision to “bump” a different question from the list and replace it, but I didn’t have the heart today to remove another skeptic’s question, so I sent them both, especially since he told me beforehand that the number today would be flexible. I love that it’s 21 Qs on episode 21!
@brocklee78595 ай бұрын
So many juicy theological details in this video! My favorite Friday Q&A ever❤️
@Dominicus135 ай бұрын
Mike, thanks for all you do. I don’t always agree with you, but you help me think Biblically and have made me better at apologetics.
@flowerpower36185 ай бұрын
That’s the good thing. We can disagree on minor things and still treat other well. He is masterful at being humble , yet brilliant
@darienalvarado51855 ай бұрын
I think many of us can copy this exact comment 😇 He's helped me greatly with applying Matt 10:16 with disagreements inside the body.
@desireehelms80125 ай бұрын
Mike Winger is a false teacher and he is listed as a false prophet and Jack Mack 77 plainly exposes Mike Winger as a false teacher because Mike Winger fancies him self as an intelect and you can't teach the word out of intelect all those who do are false teachers and the Apostle Paul says so in first Corinthians 4 and 5
@Israphel7765 ай бұрын
How about thinking logically and rationally instead? Seems like it'd be far more useful in every day life. Also the hilarity of your "one true religion" even needing apologetics.
@ryanlindback93935 ай бұрын
@@Israphel776go to question 5 buddy
@livingtoaster13585 ай бұрын
With the book of judges "contradiction" of human sacrifice, it also shows that God takes vows seriously, and the importance of being careful of what you vow, and even the Bible takes it further and say "do not even take a vow"
@drau085 ай бұрын
That shirt is fire
@richbozzi31485 ай бұрын
Take your time Mike… we Christians preach patience. Another minute loading software will not deter us.and thank you
@rebeccaczajor5 ай бұрын
You mean you are Christians, have you ever read Jesus Doing what this Mike is doing? And you feel he is Christian, wow
@SantiagoGarcia-xq4sg5 ай бұрын
Whoever was emojing yall are hilarious! Great episode Mike! I love your heart for not just truth but making it relevant, accessible, and understandable for those who still haven't reconciled with Jesus!
@songsfromtheriverhouse41185 ай бұрын
just thought you should know I have shared you/your channel with my 18 year old daughter who has then shared you with others her age... and they are LOVING you. I am truly thankful for your style of teaching and exegesis that is easy to "digest" and process and follow along. thanks mike
@dazzlemefine3115 ай бұрын
Please do more skeptics editions! They’re so helpful because I sometimes don’t know how to start an answer to some questions asked. These are so amazing
@jeremyn49125 ай бұрын
Another great book for skeptics who truly want to dive in and find truth is "I Don't Have Enough Faith To Be An Atheist" by Frank Turek
@handsomemonkeyking52995 ай бұрын
Not that guy again 😂 Sorry but he’s not all he’s cracked up to be. Leave the atheists alone 😂 you can be one if you never even hear of faith
@robotpaperscissors5 ай бұрын
100% agree its a great book
@ritawing10645 ай бұрын
@handsomemonkeyking5299 yes, Turek is rude, aggressive and ill-informed.
@Theonly_Onyx5 ай бұрын
Frank is a logical man. But I don't understand why people keep saying he's rude. Is he right? Don't be so soft and weak, take the knowledge regardless of how it's presented.
@ritawing10645 ай бұрын
@@Theonly_Onyx there is no knowledge and certainly no logic: just a few passive-aggressive tricks (like yours: "don't be soft and weak") which his interlocutors let pass. The day of these hucksters is passing, fortunately.
@mamamia47455 ай бұрын
I truly love yoir answer to question 19! Please continue to pray for me sharing with my skeptical (grown) children.
@seaglass.jen865 ай бұрын
Have you ever done Bible Study Fellowship? It’s a weekly study, discussion group, lecture, and notes with groups worldwide! It’s helped me grow in my biblical understanding and preparing me for sharing my faith with others. Starts up again in early September (and goes til May) and we’re studying Revelation this year!
@ArmoredE65 ай бұрын
I am smart ...but I don't speak smart and am not taken seriously. And because I'm "artsy" and not "sciencey" I am dismissed in my attempts to explain what Mike is saying. And unfortunately no one yet has even attempted to sit through one of Mike's vids. Additionally I'm a newish Christian (formerly agnostic sarcastic worldly and wild). My conversion is not really accepted by those who know me . They don't believe that I spend 20 hrs a week learning the Bible and no longer watch TV, Netflix etc. 😢🤷
@katiemorrow23985 ай бұрын
@@ArmoredE6 keep going!! There will be more people that you encounter and you really don't know what kind of thoughts you provoke when you speak to others. We don't always get to see the fruits of our labor. Keep going!
@funnygaming26725 ай бұрын
same i try to post proof on reddit and got swarmed by people that just told me I'm wrong and when i ask please give me your proof evidence that i am wrong they start to be very aggressive and dishonest not answering when the whole post is about that. Unbelievers no matter what you show has evidence even from expert will reject God and find any excuse even stupid one to not check them. There is a verse from God to waste more time on them has others need saving
@ArmoredE65 ай бұрын
@@katiemorrow2398 thank you! I just don't know when I should sort of back off on the close friends and whatnot because I can clearly tell that I'm just annoying them and I want to stay in their good graces so that I can continue to love on them and hoping eventually that they will realize all of the trials and tribulations that I've gone through and kept my face and continued searching for the truth and stay hungry for the word. I'm not trying to appease them per se but I'm just thinking maybe I need to back off a little bit. However that's difficult I guess it's the Holy Spirit nudging me because every time I talk or text them I can't even get a paragraph or sentence out without talking about God LOL
@reality19585 ай бұрын
@@funnygaming2672I’m an unbeliever. Does this god know that if a god ever revealed itself to me that I would no longer be an atheist?
@milankurienov67685 ай бұрын
@@reality1958"No sign will be given to [this generation] except for the sign of Jonah" - Matthew 12:39 That is to say, God has already given you more than enough evidence. That you reject it shows that you have a heart issue, not an intellectual one.
@markhaszoe-life63375 ай бұрын
question 21 was my story also, I was new and very gullible. it was this ministry that helped me to help myself to how to properly read and understand the scriptures, with the help of the Holy Spirit I'm getting there I have 1000 times better understanding than I did 4 years ago.
@Masowe.5 ай бұрын
I recommend impact video ministries and DLM Christian lifestyle, I don't have enough faith to be an atheist or for some provocative thoughts and healthy speculation, grace digital network as well. If you don't mind calvinism, Desiring God does a great job
@roberthill45815 ай бұрын
One helpful reference book I highly recommend for Christians is Keeping Faith in an Age of Reason: Refuting Alleged Bible Contradictions by Jason Lisle, Master Books, 2017. He covers 420 claims of Bible contradictions and sets the record straight.
@FalconOfStorms5 ай бұрын
420? Nice.
@Topher30885 ай бұрын
Nice
@epicofatrahasis37755 ай бұрын
*The Enuma Elish would later be the inspiration for the Hebrew scribes who created the text now known as the biblical Book of Genesis.* Prior to the 19th century CE, the Bible was considered the oldest book in the world and its narratives were thought to be completely original. In the mid-19th century CE, however, European museums, as well as academic and religious institutions, sponsored excavations in Mesopotamia to find physical evidence for historical corroboration of the stories in the Bible. ***These excavations found quite the opposite, however, in that, once cuneiform was translated, it was understood that a number of biblical narratives were Mesopotamian in origin.*** *Famous stories such as the Fall of Man and the Great Flood were originally conceived and written down in Sumer,* translated and modified later in Babylon, and reworked by the Assyrians ***before they were used by the Hebrew scribes for the versions which appear in the Bible.*** ***In revising the Mesopotamian creation story for their own ends, the Hebrew scribes tightened the narrative and the focus but retained the concept of the all-powerful deity who brings order from chaos.*** Marduk, in the Enuma Elish, establishes the recognizable order of the world - *just as God does in the Genesis tale* - and human beings are expected to recognize this great gift and honor the deity through service. *"Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia"* *"Sumerian Is the World's Oldest Written Language | ProLingo"* *"Sumerian Civilization: Inventing the Future - World History Encyclopedia"* ("The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE." "Ancient Israelites and their origins date back to 1800-1200 BCE.") *"The Myth of Adapa - World History Encyclopedia"* Also discussed by Professor Christine Hayes at Yale University in her 1st lecture of the series on the Hebrew Bible from 8:50 to 14:30 minutes, lecture 3 from 28:30 to 41:35 minutes, lecture 4 from 0:00 up to 21:30 minutes and 24:00 up to 35:30 minutes and lecture 7 from 24:20 to 25:10 minutes. From a Biblical scholar: "Many stories in the ancient world have their origins in other stories and were borrowed and modified from other or earlier peoples. *For instance, many of the stories now preserved in the Bible are* ***modified*** *versions of stories that existed in the cultures and traditions of Israel’s* ***older*** *contemporaries.* Stories about the creation of the universe, a cataclysmic universal flood, digging wells as land markers, the naming of important cultic sites, gods giving laws to their people, and even stories about gods decreeing the possession of land to their people were all part of the cultural and literary matrix of the ancient Near East. *Biblical scribes freely* ***adopted and modified*** *these stories as a means to express their own identity, origins, and customs."* *"Stories from the Bible"* by Dr Steven DiMattei, from his website *"Biblical Contradictions"* ------------------------------------------------------------------ In addition, look up the below articles. *"Yahweh was just an ancient Canaanite god. We have been deceived! - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"* *"Hammurabi - World History Encyclopedia"* (Hammurabi (r. 1792-1750 BCE) was the sixth king of the Amorite First Dynasty of Babylon best known for his famous law code which served as the model for others, *including the Mosaic Law of the Bible.)* *"Debunking the Devil - Michael A. Sherlock (Author)"* *"The Greatest Trick Religion Ever Pulled: Convincing Us That Satan Exists | Atheomedy"* *"Zoroastrianism And Persian Mythology: The Foundation Of Belief"* (Scroll to the last section: Zoroastrianism is the Foundation of Western Belief) *"10 Ways The Bible Was Influenced By Other Religions - Listverse"* *"January | 2014 | Atheomedy"* - Where the Hell Did the Idea of Hell Come From? *"Retired bishop explains the reason why the Church invented "Hell" - Ideapod"* Watch *"The Origins of Salvation, Judgement and Hell"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica (Sensitive theists should only watch from 7:00 to 17:30 minutes as evangelical Christians are lambasted. He's a former theist and has been studying the scholarship and comparative religions for over 15 years) *"Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology - The Sensuous Curmudgeon"* *"Forget about Noah's Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood | Bible Interp"* *"The Search for Noah’s Flood - Biblical Archaeology Society"* *"Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia"* *"The Atrahasis Epic: The Great Flood & the Meaning of Suffering - World History Encyclopedia"* Watch *"How Aron Ra Debunks Noah's Flood"* (8 part series debunking Noah's flood using multiple branches of science) *"The Adam and Eve myth - News24"* *"Before Adam and Eve - Psychology Today"* *"Gilgamesh vs. Noah - Wordpress"* *"Old Testament Tales Were Stolen From Other Cultures - Griffin"* *"Parallelism between “The Hymn to Aten” and Psalm 104 - Project Augustine"* *"Studying the Bible"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei (This particular article from a critical Biblical scholar highlights how the authors of the Hebrew Bible used their *fictional* god as a mouthpiece for their own views and ideologies) *"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei
@paulajames61495 ай бұрын
Mike, love your analogies. I am not an intellect so the analogies help me to easily understand some of these at first glance contradictions. Very helpful and clear. My faith grows every time I watch your videos. Thank you!
@Anabee35 ай бұрын
Love your t-shirt Pastor! Ty for all you do. I don't think you can ever know the impact of your work.
@seaglass.jen865 ай бұрын
He’ll know one day! ☺️🙌
@amyqb1175 ай бұрын
Mike! You are doing the Lords work! Thank you for giving me answers to these questions that I can verify for myself! Thank you for your passion and purpose. God be glorified!
@lorriepeek56365 ай бұрын
Great question and wonderful answers. I really enjoyed watching. Thanks for sharing your knowledge with us. And your jokes crack me up 😁
@MiMiLfE5 ай бұрын
I haven’t watched this yet but immediately saw your shirt and thought “ I NEED THAT”!
@bumblebeeflyaway5 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for this Q&A
@ayiir75 ай бұрын
Please more skeptics editions. They're asking questions I struggle to put into words as a believer
@ryanrevland43335 ай бұрын
The most difficult to answer is about Jesus's failed prophecies. I struggle to answer that one.
@ayiir75 ай бұрын
@@ryanrevland4333 Whatever you’re referring to likely hasn’t come to pass or has been misinterpreted
@ryanrevland43335 ай бұрын
@ayiir7 Atheists usually quote Matthew 10:23 and 16:27-28. I have to admit, it certainly reads like Jesus predicted His return within the lifetime of His disciples.
@ayiir75 ай бұрын
@@ryanrevland4333 I’ve always assumed that Matthew 16:37-28 is referring to either A) a few humans that genuinely won’t die because limit God’s supernatural abilities and will in your mind? Or B) it’s a metaphor for the moving of The Holy Spirit within the people of Israel because scripture has referring to us believers as the Church or Christ’s Kingdom. I’d just spend some time researching that one if it’s weighing on your spirit. Doesn’t seem too complex to get to the bottom of.
@kingofslimes2555 ай бұрын
@@ryanrevland4333 While I'm not sure of a solution to Matthew 10:23 off the top of my head, I think that Matthew 16:28 is referring to the Transfiguration rather than the 2nd coming of Christ. Jesus says this same line in Luke 9:27 and Mark 9:1, and on all 3 occasions this statement is immediately followed by an account of the Transfiguration where God's glory and kingdom are shown to Peter, James, and John. As additional support for this, Jesus specifically says that they will not die *before* they witness the kingdom of God, implying that they will die after witnessing it. If the kingdom of God in this context referred to the second coming, then they wouldn't die after. Hope this helps!
@roseludvik17435 ай бұрын
Love your program ,it’s helps me a lot 🙏🥰🌹
@lesliematyas19215 ай бұрын
finished the mark series ..all 70 episodes ....great teachings . now ono the questions with winger.
@MikeWinger5 ай бұрын
Awesome!
@lesliematyas19215 ай бұрын
mike...it was shirley mc clain ....wentcrazy with this agenda.
@maryrosehallowed66625 ай бұрын
This is great! I am looking forward to a series on this. I read the whole Bible 6 times and it all fits together without contradictions the more you study and understand it. The thing is you need the Holy Spirit, it is like the air that fills up an inflatable ball and the supposed contradictions vanish. All the Bible college and commentaries in the world can't do that job. If there are questions, make a list and pray, it really works as God answers them. The key is being open and truly wanting to know the truth. We do not fear the truth at all. Searching diligently is good and sharpens our apologetics. I can answer so many of these questions but you always learn something new and that is exciting. That was great about the justice systems comparison for instance! For one thing I am amazed how many do not understand the distinction between the Old and New Covenants, Jesus is the fulfillment of so much and so we don't need to keep the OT laws like the sabbath and circumcision, etc. Our circumcision is of the heart, our sabbath rest is Jesus, we do our thing on Sunday because of the Resurrection and Pentecost and that is when they met. It just shows me they never truly studied the Bible even to glean the elementary things of the faith. That is not a contradiction in the Bible, it is a lack of study. Now with evolution, you can't hold to that because with it, death came long before the fall. According to the Bible animals came before man, then man sinned and then death entered. God created man and all things, not evolution. Also, it is not a 'scientific fact,' it is called evolutionary 'theory' for a reason, it is merely a theory and not a fact. I do think the creation story is a bit simplified because the intention was not to write a science book but a salvation book. Like you would explain a complicated thing to a child. One last point is that there are some honest skeptics and seekers out there. But there are also some that are simply hostile and hateful and not open at all. One thing I see is that atheism is mostly not an issue of the mind or intellectual, but of the heart. When in a debate with an atheist, after a while it comes down to the existential issue of suffering and why God allows it, and there are reasons that man does not understand. But if you dig deeper you eventually come to a comment like; "But then why did God let..... (blank) happen in my life?" So it boils down to: 1. They know there is a God. It's not just hypothetical. 2. They had a bad thing happen. 3. They think since God is in control, all must be paradise now. 4. Thus they blame God, get angry, and turn on God. They spend a lot of time fighting someone they claim does not exist. If that thing had not happened, they may still believe in God, or be in relationship with Him actually. So there are intellectual aspects to it but mainly emotional and spiritual ones. In cases where the relationship is restored, it is always a heart issue that is dealt with rather a mind issue. A good way of approaching this is the following. Suppose you run into an atheist and have a discussion. You propose something to them. You say suppose every intellectual question was answered, every moral concern, every doubt and skepticism dealt with to full satisfaction. So every mental roadblock was cleared for them. Would they now turn to God? Would their hearts now do a U-turn to God? I would venture to say no because it is a heart issue and not a mind issue. Ultimately a spiritual thing and they rationalized with all these walls they built up in the name of science and such. Don't get me wrong, we need the intellectual aspects to be discussed. But for instance I keep running into atheist types who point to the bad behavior of Christians and the lack of love in the church, etc. as a justification for their stance. I can't help but think of Jesus' words at the Last Supper; "They will know you are My disciples by your love for one another." He is real, we are His disciples, Christianity is true, but the outside world will know by our love... for one another. Sadly I do see all this volunteerism where churches go around doing all these good works for the world, but when there is a sister or brother in the church who needs help; they are totally ignored. It creates problems like this. Blessings and looking forward to next time!
@seanodowd40855 ай бұрын
You need the Holy Spirit? Can you demonstrate the Holy Spirit?
@RCGWho5 ай бұрын
A lot of good input here. I just question "we don't have to have a sabbath ". It's so simplistic to dump the entire old testament because of the new covenant. I've taught my children this: the sacrifices, the symbolic, and the ceremonies are no longer required. Jesus fulfilled them. The basic moral laws stand. The 19 commandments, for example, stand. Including the sabbath. God made the sabbath for man. It's a "get to" not a " have to" if you receive it with gratitude. Things like the mixing of cloth fibers thst people mock were symbolic of carnality and worldliness mixed with holiness (the holy and the profane). We don't have to follow that law because it's symbolic, but maybe we should because the church is excessively worldly today.
@seanodowd40855 ай бұрын
@@RCGWho does your god change? If not, then everything in the Old Testament still stands.
@RCGWho5 ай бұрын
@@seanodowd4085 Well, yes and no. It's all still true. It still makes the New Testament make more sense. It still has promises and moral laws to obey. But you would be a judaizer if you insist the ceremonies, sacrifices, and symbolism fulfilled in Christ must be followed.
@seanodowd40855 ай бұрын
@@RCGWho what does “yes and no” mean? Can you demonstrate the Holy Spirit or not?
@tammyschirra6125 ай бұрын
Thank you for being God's tool. Thank you for making this video. It is an answer to my prayers. My son just graduated from college and has been working through doubts. One of the discussions we had was the iron chariots argument. I was 😮 baffled by him even having this as a problem, but now I know where it came from. Thank you for your hard work. Thank you for loving God so much that you want us to know him better.
@jonwonch86935 ай бұрын
I really appreciate your work. Thank you
@debadams32525 ай бұрын
Love the shirt!!! Your teachings are sound and I have learned a lot from the way you analyze and answer questions. Thank you for all you do. Thankful for bringing light to the darkness of Hinn. I’ve known about his false teachings since I first saw him in action. I believe there is a special place for people like him, and scammers, if they do not repent. Joe B!! lol…I have started saying that instead of I’m having a senior moment. My mother had dementia at the end of her days and I said I’m having a “mother’s name” moment. I respected her so much, so I’m not dissing Joe.
@masonharrison26425 ай бұрын
Mike Winger for president!!!
@darid175 ай бұрын
Relating to the Jephtaph (sorry for the spelling) - I have read some Rabbinic explanations which are in conflict as to whether she was even sacrificed. This was one man's selfish wish to get victory. I am glad Mike mentioned that this man had option to redeem his child and that there is death penalty for child sacrifice. This story has been a thorn at my side and I am so glad to hear this explanation about the parents redeeming their children and about the children dedicated to the Lord.
@TracyAbellera5 ай бұрын
Thank you Mr. Winger & Sarah. Tracy Abellera
@sarahfaith3165 ай бұрын
❤ God bless you, sister Tracy!
@faiththroughfire77625 ай бұрын
I need that shirt Mike! God bless your ministry you have helped me through some troubling times in my life
@Sandra123-y3j5 ай бұрын
Adding a comment to help spread this channel 🤗
@JIFAMPodcast5 ай бұрын
First thank you for doing this, love the work the Lord has you doing. I had a thought on the Muslim question and someone may have answered it but, the first followers of Jesus were not from a western nation. They had to "give up" a lot to follow Christ. We happen to be in an not so normal time period that we do not have to, generally give up as much as our brothers and sisters in Christ. But throughout history Christianity, true Christianity has suffered.
@loveycat54745 ай бұрын
Love your shirt.
@maximbadaev57385 ай бұрын
I was a skeptic with questions just like these who looked to Mike Winger’s Q&A series; to those that find themselves in this camp: keep sharpening your questions, keep asking them, and keep thinking honestly. Trust where it’ll lead you.
@Zinguzan5 ай бұрын
Hey, Mike, can you do a book recommendation video?
@codyrichardson63485 ай бұрын
@@Zinguzan I would love a monthly book recommendations from Mike. Great idea
@goldengaming1775 ай бұрын
I would love Mike to have a book recommendation list on his website. Would be great to be able to see what books he likes for particular topics.
@Zinguzan5 ай бұрын
@@goldengaming177 that would be great to have a list like that, even books he feels are a good resource on a list 👍
@kamarwashington5 ай бұрын
I think people asked him this before and he said he’s reluctant to share because he doesn’t want his recommendations to be misconstrued as endorsements of a persons theology
@Zinguzan5 ай бұрын
@@kamarwashington thats understandable, I assumed he would make a disclaimer, but people seem to put words in his mouth or make edits for their narrative often :(
@rhondabulmer96045 ай бұрын
It was the actress Shirley MacLaine who stood on a beach and called out, "I am God" -- interestingly, a little bit before Frank Peretti published "This Present Darkness."
@KristoferOlsen-k3e5 ай бұрын
Hey, Mike- thanks for all you and your ministry. It’s been a big blessing to my faith walk. Question: “Afterward Moses and Aaron went to Pharaoh and said, “This is what the Lord, the God of Israel, says: ‘Let my people go, so that they may hold a festival to me in the wilderness.’ ” Pharaoh said, “Who is the Lord, that I should obey him and let Israel go? I do not know the Lord and I will not let Israel go.” Then they said, “The God of the Hebrews has met with us. Now let us take a three-day journey into the wilderness to offer sacrifices to the Lord our God, or he may strike us with plagues or with the sword.”” Exodus 5:1-3 NIV I thought God purposed the exodus to be permanent.. not 3 days. Thoughts?
@mrdrprofdaddy5 ай бұрын
"Now let us take a three-day journey into the wilderness to offer sacrifices to the Lord our God" there is the answer. This is for a specific time they are asking for, the exodus happens later
@kat_1525 ай бұрын
They ask for it because God knows it will be denied. This way, no one can claim they didn't try to be more 'reasonable' when they demanded to leave. It was also to show Aaron and Moses how their hearts had been hardened. At least, that's how I interpret it
@junk39965 ай бұрын
just because the journey will take 3 days doesn't mean it won't be permanent i fail to see how this implies it isn't permanent, or that they'll be coming back just because they outline how long the journey would take
@hminchella74235 ай бұрын
I love how you teach Mike with humour and humility
@eleanorde-hayes77605 ай бұрын
Re Evolution v Creator; recommend “I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist” by Geisler and Turek.
@samdawson75605 ай бұрын
Fantastic work with this Q&A.
@jessi__jack5 ай бұрын
That shirt is iconic. Where did you get it 🤣
@daviddurham91585 ай бұрын
I appreciate, from Mike, the acceptance of me and my fellow Theistic Evolutionists
@joshuawoodin5 ай бұрын
Hey mike, the 4th Q was a person who asked how can we trust scripture when the earliest manuscripts are from the 3rd-4th centuries, this is not true at all, we have around 6k manuscripts of the new testement all from the 1st century, the latest by design was by John, around 75-90AD John's gospel and revelation, written after the destruction of the temple in 70AD, this late dating is silly and is a tactic by presupposing miricales don't happen, so the times jesus prophesied the destruction of the temple was after 70AD because people can't predict the future, its not scriptures fault, it's the unwillingness of the skeptic. I wish mike would have said no manuscript was written in the 3rd or 4th century, I can't think of anyone who is respected in scholarship that manuscripts were being written around the days of the council of naecea, the Canon was already closed around that time, skeptics do the same with late dating daniel, because a person can't predict the future, so we will date daniel super late because of our presuppositions. Daniel of the old testament is 1 of the.most powerful and deeply fulfilling prophetic books from the babylonian empire to asyrian and grecco-roman and seleucid empires and like over 700 years of 100% fullfilled prophecies, if a skeptic shows me there ID / license and I say no you look 65 not what this shows you can't be 46 years old, I will tell you your age as this document does not fit my presuppositions. Now apply this logic to the most popular and important writings of history and hope you see the hypocrisy and the double speak humans do.
@NickTimmer5 ай бұрын
We have copies of John's writings. We do not have the original letters that the gospel writers and Paul sent out.
@joshuawoodin5 ай бұрын
@@NickTimmerright, the copies are from the 1st century still right ? There is parts of John's gospel written on a page the size of a credit card, my point is zero of the about 6k manuscripts are from the 3rd or 4th century. So I don't see your point ? There is this channel called "everything NT" I would love to see you test your new testament knowledge with a person who can back up there claims, I am no scholar or koine greek historian, however i am not completely ignorant on the matter, so again what is the point of your comment so I can better engage ?
@char.m.s59875 ай бұрын
Loved your answer that advised something like, don’t die on the hill of evolution when speaking to atheists. The key thing is to help them understand their need to acknowledge a greater Being, and then what that Being is like (He gave His Son to save us). Why add stumbling blocks that are unnecessary? If they come to Christ, and surrender to Him, the Lord will continue to lead them into greater truth. Trust God to teach and lead those who have come to love Him.
@RCGWho5 ай бұрын
But what if that's the topic they present. Do you concede or just change the subject and risk appearing evasive?
@amyqb1175 ай бұрын
@@RCGWhoI think the answer he gave was the best! Because it pointed them to God still. All the atheistic claims still lead to the existence of an uncreated creator, and uncaused cause. Why not figure what or who that is? Then propose explanations of what this being could be. . It will always come back to a being that has the characteristics of God if truly they are interested in the topic or at least intellectually honest.
@lancesmith17585 ай бұрын
Could the lesson be about foolishly making vows without thinking? Ecclesiastes 5:4-5
@simona_petrut5 ай бұрын
we wouldn’t mind if you’d match the number of answered questions to the episode number. can’t wait for the hundred video:)
@joys.63475 ай бұрын
If we're going to use the Sabbath as a law that Jesus fulfilled, then did He fulfill the other Ten COmmandments as well, to make them optional?
@RCGWho5 ай бұрын
Huge
@RCGWho5 ай бұрын
Americans are generally major sabbath breakers. They want to backpack, go to the beach, water ski, go to the mall etc. Or otherwise gratify themselves. I spent time in New Zealand in the 80s and the families I stayed with went to church, had family over to eat a pre-prepared meal, and then chatted, lounged, or napped the rest of the day. Shops were CLOSED. You did your shopping, baking, errands, or cleaning on Friday evening or Saturday.
@lnln36565 ай бұрын
Mike, please think about this question! It makes so much sense! Jesus kept the Sabbath! Makes no sense He would not want us to as well.
@seaglass.jen865 ай бұрын
Exodus 20:11 “For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested* on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.” Jesus said “Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls.”” Matthew 11:28-29 Jesus is our rest now. He fulfilled the Sabbath. He directs the thinking and doing of His sheep and keeps us in a state of constant rest. Other 9 commandments still stand as necessary, but for the Sabbath, we have a new rest that has been obtained thru Jesus.
@amyqb1175 ай бұрын
Jesus being a fulfilment of the law is vastly different from what you are saying here. You are using the words fulfilment but in a completely different context of the original passage of “fulfilment of the Law”. Please look at the passage again. . Jesus said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17-18). . Jesus says that He came to fulfill the Law and the Prophets. In other words, Jesus’ purpose was to establish the Word, to embody it, and to fully accomplish all that was written. “Christ is the culmination of the law” (Romans 10:4). . Jesus Christ fulfilled the Law in at least two ways: as a teacher and as a doer. He taught people to obey the Law (Matthew 22:35-40; Mark 1:44), and He obeyed the Law Himself (John 8:46; 1 Peter 2:22). In living a perfect life, Jesus fulfilled the moral laws; in His sacrificial death, Jesus fulfilled the ceremonial laws. Christ came not to destroy the old religious system but to build upon it; He came to finish the Old Covenant and establish the New. . This has nothing to do with absolving man from obeying any of the commandments. . But YES, Jesus is also the “Lord of the Sabbath" (Matthew 12:8). He decides the true meaning of the Sabbath because He created it, and He is our Sabbath rest in the flesh. So if Jesus states a different way to “do the sabbath”, then so be it. It is not a dishonouring of the Sabbath, it is a fulfilment of it, but different from what it was. . Hence, there are no actual commandments that you do not have to obey any longer. Simply one that you do not observe as one would at the time it was given. . And what then did Jesus say about this change: "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath" (Mark 2:27). Jesus was restating the principle that the Sabbath rest was instituted to relieve man of his labors, just as He came to relieve us of our attempting to achieve salvation by our works.
@marytodd91705 ай бұрын
God bless your content !!!
@truth88875 ай бұрын
Regarding definition about gender and sexuality, why should majority follow the new "definition" made by minority (tiny %) of people who confuse about themselves? Why should majority allow minority dictate majority?
@chazzitz-wh4ly5 ай бұрын
Imagine letting the patients run the asylum and calling anyone who wuestions it derogatory names.
@amyqb1175 ай бұрын
I even believe that this distinction should have NEVER been made and it is fundamentally anti-Christian and anti-reality.
@traylorpark5 ай бұрын
Pastor Mike: I was told that the "turning the other cheek" is also a cultural thing that when a superior would smack a subordinate, they would backhand them. When I 'turn the other cheek' I would essentially force you to smack me open hand which is basically levelling the ground making us peers rather than a superior/subordinate. Do you know anything about this?
@TracyAbellera5 ай бұрын
OH YEAH LOVE THE SHIRT! I have 2 Black Cats.
@JTF_TheChristianAndVtuber5 ай бұрын
1:13:10 It is true I've been taught to be mad and offended when somebody is lying and it could actually cause harm to people, yes I have been taught that.
@RCGWho5 ай бұрын
41:00 evolution. I do not buy that evolution/creation is 2nd tier or third tier, or however humans try to categorize heresy vs acceptable doctrinal differences. Creation is God's primary way of displaying His existence and glory. It’s not optional to disbelieve God's revelation of His attributes. How like satan to co-opt God's primary way of revealing Himself. It's not salvific? You can call God a liar and still be saved?
@davegink92225 ай бұрын
I think you missed the point. As Mike said, it all leads back to God being the Creator. That’s the takeaway. Whether the Earth is young, or old, or whether God created the universe through the big bang, or didn’t, or whether evolution was part of God‘s creation, or wasn’t, none of that is a salvation issue. It’s not calling God a liar, simply because you’re not sure if the Genesis account is literal or not. And I’m sure as you will attest, not everything in the Bible IS literal. If you took it literally on flat earth, you would have to say the Earth is flat. But we know it’s not. Understanding that isn’t calling God a liar.
@RCGWho5 ай бұрын
@@davegink9222 I find that riding the fence as an evolutionary creationist or theistic evolutionists or whatever they call themselves pleases no one (except themselves). Evolutionists aren't appeased by it and reject it. Creationist reject it. God knew people and where they'd go with this. So, in Genesis He was very detailed in His language to the point of redundancy. He said over and over, "And evening and morning were the.....day." No metaphor. NO room to assume a giant space of time. Unless you don't believe Him. Or don't want to be uncool among the educated. Or don't think He's able to do it as described. I can't speak for God, but I believe what we believe about this point is a much bigger deal than we're making it.
@patriciaboggs88825 ай бұрын
@@RCGWho Agree. I love Mike Winger. He is one of my favorite Bible teachers but I think he has a bit of a blind spot here. He has also said that he hasn't really studied it yet. I have a feeling that if he did, like the women series, then he'd come away with a similar conclusion. That the scholarship of those who try to combine the Bible with some form of evolution, old earth, etc is similar to that of the egalitarians (but maybe worse).
@patriciaboggs88825 ай бұрын
@@davegink9222 I'm not saying that you are calling God a liar but understand that most of the people preaching evolution/old earth are calling God a liar or saying He doesn't exist or maybe a god exists but not the one of the Bible. Yes there are poetic expressions in Scripture. The earth is God's footstool; no one has ever taught that God has literal giant feet resting on the planet. But that doesn't mean that we can just dismiss whatever we don't like as poetry. There are clear indicators for when something is historically described and when it is poetic. Is this salvific? Depends on what you mean. Is the truth of original creation the core gospel itself? No. Is it impossible for someone who believes in evolution to be a Christian? No. But is it profitable? Is it impossible for someone who doesn't believe in Virgin births, angels, or church gatherings to be a Christian? I don't think so but that doesn't mean it doesn't matter. Is the 2nd coming the core gospel itself? Is there no problem if we just say that all of Revelation is poetic, not literal? What about lgbtq issues? I'm not saying that evolution/creation teaching is a salvific issue for you or every person. However, I have heard many, many people explain that ideas related to evolution are what keep/kept them from believing the Bible and accepting Christ. Humanism/Marxism/atheism have become the dominant religion of the west and many hundreds of millions are in fact being led away from Jesus because of their lies. How is that not a salvific issue for those people? Not much different than the people rejecting God's Word because of LGBTQ or because of the Judaizers in the 1st century. I think it is dangerous for the church to continue to ignore this.
@lynandrews41603 ай бұрын
Hi Mike, very helpful thank you. Lyn
@mugglescakesniffer39435 ай бұрын
Again the genealogies were 14 to make Cinderella's shoe fit. "While the number 14 is not a strict count of generations, it is profoundly symbolic in Jewish numerology, signifying completeness and perfection. "
@ryanrevland43335 ай бұрын
Exactly. Matthew cracked open Chronicles and Kings and did a little copy pasta. He had to leave out a few names to fit the number he was going for
@joykeebler19165 ай бұрын
- now as seeing, how the process of humility works
@biglewthebigjew5 ай бұрын
A simpler (and better in my opinion) explanation for Jephtha has 3 points: 1) His vow was unnecessary. God always keeps His promises and in this case it was to protect the Israelites. So Jephtha would have been victorious anyway. 2) Jephtha could have easily gotten out of his vow by following the guidance in Leviticus 5:4-6 which reads: "or if anyone thoughtlessly takes an oath to do anything, whether good or evil (in any matter one might carelessly swear about) even though they are unaware of it, but then they learn of it and realize their guilt- when anyone becomes aware that they are guilty in any of these matters, they must confess in what way they have sinned. As a penalty for the sin they have committed, they must bring to the Lord a female lamb or goat from the flock as a sin offering; and the priest shall make atonement for them for their sin.". And 3) as Mike mentioned, Jephtha died very shortly after doing this sacrifice so he was unable to continue his family line which (in my view) is a punishment for his ignorance and/or arrogance concerning God's word. So there is absolutely zero contradiction whether it was Jephtha sacrificing his daughter's life or virginity as a replacement. We can easily see that Jephtha is simply a good example of what NOT to do
@bitsoffaith5 ай бұрын
True love your comment
@biglewthebigjew5 ай бұрын
@@bitsoffaith I appreciate it!
@shua5105 ай бұрын
Ima need the link to that shirt
@taraingersoll86915 ай бұрын
Amazon
@themadscientist40k5 ай бұрын
Don’t get Bidened!
@lezzimars60615 ай бұрын
About Jephtag’s daughter being “sacrificed” look up Bensons commentary on Biblehub of judges 11:40, the Hebrew translation of “Lament” is to celebrate, meaning she was not dead. To help get more clarity about this. Thanks Mike! Blessings
@amyqb1175 ай бұрын
I think so as well. But regardless the situation had nothing to do with what God commands or wants. That was all jepthahs doing.
@mugglescakesniffer39435 ай бұрын
Where does it say in the bible Jeptha's vow is stupid?
@RCGWho5 ай бұрын
There are verses that say to be very cautious about making vows, which infers that it's easy to make impulsive, stupid ones. I'm not looking to argue, so with that, I'll bow out.
@benkennington89415 ай бұрын
@@mugglescakesniffer3943 Nowhere! Hebrews 11 singles him out as a hero of faith, without any specific incident being cited.
@DepDawg5 ай бұрын
What he vowed to do was expressly forbidden by God in Deuteronomy 12:31. But I will include the full passage so you may read the context. 29 ““When the Lord your God cuts off before you the nations whom you go in to dispossess, and you dispossess them and dwell in their land, 30 take care that you be not ensnared to follow them, after they have been destroyed before you, and that you do not inquire about their gods, saying, ‘How did these nations serve their gods?-that I also may do the same.’ 31 You shall not worship the Lord your God in that way, for every abominable thing that the Lord hates they have done for their gods, for they even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods. 32 “Everything that I command you, you shall be careful to do. You shall not add to it or take from it.” Deuteronomy 12:29-32
@jml51005 ай бұрын
@DepDawg he didn't do that. The word translated whole burnt offering in the Hebrew has nothing inherently to do with fire. The base of the word is total devotion, so in the case of an animal sacrifice it must be completely burned up (unlike the other sacrifices). Also, he gave the vow the next verse AFTER Holy Spirit came upon him. Furthermore, customary action would have been for the women of the town to come out greeting the victorious men as they returned from battle. He knew a person was coming out, not a random cow walking out of his home, he just thought it would be a servant. And he clearly knew his Bible well, as he showed when talking to the enemy at the beginning of the chapter. He was planning on committing someone to the tabernacle. It fits context, culture, and grammar. I studied all this in my Masters degree. But even just noting that the book of Hebrews praises him as no less then a hero of the faith should be a pretty good clue.
@amyqb1175 ай бұрын
lol do you need others to say something is wrong before you deduce that it is based on the set standards? This is clear.
@auntblingsgratefullife44805 ай бұрын
Thank you! Blessings!
@zaoadore5 ай бұрын
1. James was talking to ALREADY SAVED BELIEVERS. Use common sense here. Was James really telling his brethren they weren't really saved because they were disobedient? You can't use James 2 for salvific purposes. 2. James 2 is about PROFITING others with our works. It's about being justified in the sight of MEN for our works. Not God. According to Romans 4. 3. You're preaching a works based salvation, by insinuating people aren't really saved until they behave obediently to the law. 4. Paul was talking about the inner man vs the outer man. Our saved spirits vs our fallen flesh. Flesh and bone will not inherit the Kingdom.
@D12Min5 ай бұрын
Is it about being justified in the sight of men ... or about salvation? Let´s find out: James 2:23 and the Scripture was fulfilled which says, “And Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” and he was called a friend of God. 24 You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone. The context here CLEARLY is that God credited it to him as righteousness, not men.
@zaoadore5 ай бұрын
@@D12MinTry again. Romans 4:2 KJV [2] For IF Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but NOT before God.
@majorcajun55245 ай бұрын
@@D12Min what about Romans 4:5 “But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness”?
@D12Min5 ай бұрын
@@zaoadore so you are literally trying to pit the Bible against the Bible? Instead of just posting a verse against another verse, let´s look at both verses and let´s see how they are in harmony. The context of Romans 1-4 is clearly that you cannot EARN salvation. And that is Paul´s point here. Later in Romans (chapter 8) he makes the same point as James does in James 2. You can´t say I put my trust in Christ and then simply continue in sin. This type of faith will lead to condemnation. So Paul and James both stress that you cannot earn salvation, but that you will be condemned if you just continue in disobedience.
@D12Min5 ай бұрын
@@majorcajun5524 see my answer to zaodaore. You need to accept everything the Bible says at face value and then try to understand how everything plays together. Picking your favorite verse and trying to trump other verses with your favorites doesn´t work. God isn´t schizophrenic so that you can pick your favorite side of God...
@staystrongdisciples5 ай бұрын
Love your videos. You have helped me so much. Keep it up.
@oliviadawes33455 ай бұрын
4. Something interesting about the gospels is that they all end with very different accounts of what happened. Mark (earliest) says that the women at the empty tomb went and told no one what had happened (at first I assume?) Others say that they did, immediately. Then there’s the dispute about what Mary Magdalene went through at the tomb. Did she see an angel and then leave? Or did Christ reveal himself to her? These stories don’t mesh seamlessly. If you notice, as you move forward in time, the recordings of what went on after Jesus’s disappearance, I mean resurrection, become more and more “fanciful”…
@atcjmas5 ай бұрын
Your shirt made me laugh! God bless you man
@arnoldanthonyjohnson36624 ай бұрын
Food for spiritual thought
@mugglescakesniffer39435 ай бұрын
So, to the guy who is got mixed messages. @ 1:57:05 Getting saved should so radically alter your life that you want to do good works. it's kinda like if you are saved there will be receipts as proof.
@LandonMetochoi5 ай бұрын
Hey, man! That's me! There's a lot to unpack in my question that I wasn't able to mention, but more to what you just commented on...that philosophy doesn't make sense in light of John 5:24 and 1st John 5:13. The Bible says that we can KNOW that we have eternal life, right? And that once we believe, we are immediately passed from death into life, right? So how does what you said make any sense? If i kill somebody AFTER I am saved, am I still saved? Like, if I don't show "receipts," as you say, what then? I mean, are YOU saved? Do you really know that? I mean, you could fall away at any second, right? Pride cometh before a fall, bro. So, you could do some horrible stuff, so do you REALLY know that you're saved? No, cause you don't know if you'll fall. This CONTRADICTS the verses I cited above. This is one of the many reasons I lost my faith.
@bradley42515 ай бұрын
@@LandonMetochoi Hey Landon! I think that Ephesians 2:8-10 really clear this up: “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.” Ephesians 2:8-9 ESV We see from these two verses that salvation is by grace alone through faith alone in Jesus Christ’s death on the cross. Now if we read on just one verse ahead in Ephesians 2:10 it says: “For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.” Ephesians 2:10 ESV The keyword in this verse is “should.” As believers in Jesus Christ, we should do good works but we do not have to in order to obtain salvation. We are justified (saved) by believing the gospel, which is simply stated in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4, and we are continually being sanctified by choosing to do good works throughout the rest of our life as believers. Once we are justified, we now have the ability to either walk in the Spirit or walk in the flesh because we do not lose our free will once we are saved. I hope that was helpful for you. I pray that you come back to faith in our Lord Jesus Christ.
@richbozzi31485 ай бұрын
Great rebuttals that only apologetic study over years get this video. I’m presently thinking of going back to my Catholic roots. Papal infallibility led me to non denomination. Studies like these can help
@JTF_TheChristianAndVtuber5 ай бұрын
2:03:30 And the thing is the parent, teacher, boss, judge, they all still have to follow some sort of rules. A parent can discipline their child but they cannot abuse their child, a teacher can teach but not teach something that would be inappropriate for the class, bosses can do certain things with their employees but they still have to follow the law regarding how they treat their employees, and a judge can judge but has to according to the law and they also have to follow the law as well, same thing with God because God says that Himself.
@kimberlyadams64764 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for all you do; these videos are so helpful!! And where did you get your t shirt? I love it! ☺️
@matthiasguenther65765 ай бұрын
When it comes to deal with strong habits or even addictions I found it challenging to draw benefit from the Bible or actually take action in faith. At the end of the day at least parts of the New Testament seem to condem those who have not sufficient willpower or not strong enough faith to grasp sanctification. I kind of envy apostle Paul because he had naturally so much willpower and straightforwardness that he was able to grasp, hold and practice the gospel to its full extent.
@wishyouthebest92225 ай бұрын
How do you know that Paul had it naturally?
@matthiasguenther65765 ай бұрын
@@wishyouthebest9222 Obviously Paul had a strong character from the very beginning. See Acts
@RCGWho5 ай бұрын
2 Corinthians 10:5 5 We destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God, and take every thought captive to obey Christ, " Every thought. All of them. It does take discipline. Also, put on the full armor of God. Pray through that passage in Ephesians. Be willing to pray out loud if necessary or go get on your knees or face in private if you can. Read more scripture than seems necessary. Meditate on it. Memorize it. Read great books.
@RCGWho5 ай бұрын
1 Corinthians 10:13 "There hath no temptation taken hold of you but such as is common to man. But God is faithful; He will not suffer you to be tempted beyond that which ye are able to bear, but with the temptation will also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it."
@matthiasguenther65765 ай бұрын
@@RCGWho Thanks for the effort you put into your response. May the Lord bless you.
@rlavender96845 ай бұрын
8:00-What software or website are you using to show the Hebrew wording/meaning of forever. I would be interested in being able to use that as a resource. Does it do Greek also? Being able to find the original meaning is sometimes important even for the lay Christian. if it doesn't do both could make some recommendations on what to use as far as looking up original Hebrew and Greek? Rather not have to do it old school if I don't have to. Thanks.
@NicoleWacaser5 ай бұрын
I’m not sure what Mike uses for his research, but I use the Blue Letter Bible. It’s a website and an app. It shows the Hebrew and Greek words.
@cammon_pl20035 ай бұрын
Some Bible translations say the vow of Jefta to be "whatsover comes (...) will be Lord's OR I will offer it as a burnt offering". Also Judges 11,39 says about Jefta's daughter that "she returned unto her father, who did with her according to his vow which he had vowed: and she knew not man." Bible seems to suggest that she wasn't burnt, but rather that she was consecrated to the Lord for the rest of her life
@Jodiejjp5 ай бұрын
Q- Bring the people of Israel back to their land? (Jeremiah 23:3-8, Ezekiel 37:25-27) What is this referring to? Life after Jesus or heaven or what? Because we still have fear on earth at times but in heaven we can’t multiply/have children?
@susanpeters17445 ай бұрын
Jesus said “ I am the way the truth and the life NO one comes to the Father BUT by Me”
@wills93925 ай бұрын
Thanks for the caps-lock words that really helps.... meaning; it is our lord and saviors choice who enters the kingdom and who does not.
@eclipsesonic5 ай бұрын
Regarding Judges 1:19, many translations actually say "they", rather than "he". The KJV, ESV, RSV and NRSV say "he", while the NASB, LSB, NIV, NLT, CSB, etc. say "they." It's obvious that he and they can be used interchangeably here and are obviously both referring to Judah.
@jml51005 ай бұрын
@@eclipsesonic I just looked at the Hebrew. It's 100% "he." There is no grammatical possibility of "they." Those translations probably switch it to the plural in order to make clear that it's referring to Judah.
@eclipsesonic5 ай бұрын
@@jml5100 Good observation.
@JTF_TheChristianAndVtuber5 ай бұрын
1:13:28 Again there's a difference in saying that you are a being that's usually described and defined as a very powerful being that's higher than humans and that's not the same as humans and gender which is still in the species of humans via a social value.
@michaeltoma81135 ай бұрын
Hey Mike, Bless you ❤
@timpietz22795 ай бұрын
One clarification on Jephthah! Jephthah's sacrifice came AFTER his victory, rather than before. That might have been unclear to some viewers in the video. :)
@vasiliytereshchenko19945 ай бұрын
Still Crazy 🤪
@JTF_TheChristianAndVtuber5 ай бұрын
1:11:35 I can say the same thing for us Christians that we have a feeling of something but it's not really based on reality and you would disagree with that but that's basically the same thing, unless you can prove that we don't need Faith.
@yellaboi26715 ай бұрын
I appreciate you taking time out of your day to break all of this down for us 😊 You had a lot of insightful answers. One thing I may disagree on though is what you said in reference to islamic people or people who don't know about Jesus. I can see why you see it that way though. I personally believe that if someone believes in a false god, they won't inherit the kingdom, even if they never knew of Jesus. Abraham, Moses, etc were different because not only had Jesus not come yet, but they were already worshipping the true God of heaven. I may not have a perfectly clear view, but that's how i interpret it.
@ThatOneGuyWhatsHisName3 ай бұрын
Based mike winger
@KenThaler4 ай бұрын
Purgatory ❤ 1 Peter 3 verse 19 It was in the spirit also that he went to preach to the spirits in prison 20 They had disobeyed as long ago as Noah's day, etc etc. Chapter 4 verse 6 The reason the gospel was preached even to the dead was that, although condemned in the flesh in the eyes of men, they might live in the spirit in the eyes of God ❤
@JTF_TheChristianAndVtuber5 ай бұрын
2:00:15 But the thing is the cop can't just go 100 miles, they still have to follow the rules. The the reason why they can is because they enforce the law while still following it, God can enforce His laws while still following them.
@sandorrabe57455 ай бұрын
26:13 Proselytes were also circumcised pre Christ, in order for them to be brought into the Abrahamic covenant
@billymcnutt1164 ай бұрын
"You don't 'fix the Bible'. The Bible fixes you." -Shepherd Book
@llcoolray30005 ай бұрын
Two thoughts on Bible "contradictions": 1) They keep trotting out the same claims decade after decade, and they've all been answered. They continue in perpetuity because they're always new to some atheist who eats them right up without research. 2) Most of the claims demonstrate how the Holy Spirit allows for reading and understanding of the Scriptures, and without Him, things that are obviius seem confusing and strange and contradictory.
@lifeinanutshell71473 ай бұрын
While you may be a good Christian pastor, the fact you use English dictionary to define a word in the *translation* of the Bible instead of defining it in the original text (Hebrew/Greek or what have you) undermines your 2nd argument.
@JTF_TheChristianAndVtuber5 ай бұрын
1:51:00 When they're saying that they're not saying therefore God was actually there in the Old testament, they would most likely say yes these particular people did exist and if I would to ask them does that mean God actually exists they will most likely say no and for some they might straight up say that's the fairy tale part of it.
@mikemcclellan70265 ай бұрын
@53:08, Mike says that Muslims(people) will be judged based what knowledge they have been given. I have heard this many times but never mentioned with a verse. I agree with Mike's synopsis but was wondering if anyone could share what verse tells us this concept. Thanks!
@philnoble-r4z5 ай бұрын
Romans 2v12-16 I think
@JTF_TheChristianAndVtuber5 ай бұрын
1:11:15 There's a difference between feeling like an entirely different species that doesn't have gender because they're not social creatures like human beings and the other gender that has been socially made and has value by the same species.
@jenbrown13625 ай бұрын
Where can I get that tshirt?
@Navigata15 ай бұрын
I always enjoy your videos Mike, but I had a hang up right at the very beginning of this video - the Bible Does not contradict it's stance on the Sabbath as noted by the Roman Catholic Church that there is no biblical grounds for the Sabbath to be changed but for the Authority of the Roman Catholic Church to be able to change it from Saturday to Sunday - the story from your childhood although a good analogy need not advocate for the authenticity of the Sabbath throughout the entire Bible from Genesis to Revelations - that verse that they said is a contradiction is not even a contradiction of times past and times present if the scripture is studied deeply enough - you'll find that there is no contradiction at all within it's actual meaning and context - Blessings to this ministry and may it continue to draw people to Christ 💯
@theresa422134 ай бұрын
''When people say ''The bible is pure fiction'' ...they are so far behind, that l _genuinely_ dont know where to start'' MANY people have been told this lie over, and over again. Yes! Prayer is the only solution.
@Masowe.5 ай бұрын
I have not found one elder or Christian, apart from my husband who doesnt get offended. When i became a Christian, i was given a sister in Christ to desciple me but she gets offended or hold positions with conviction without biblical backing. If she finds that she cant answer your questions she goes, "I love you to bits but nobody thinks the way you do" or "dont worry about that, worry about what you believe" (even my elder said that) or "how does that affect your walk with Christ" or the classic "just look at the cross" or "you think everyone thinks the way you do" or "you need more grace from those that "feel like you shouldnt judge" (often if someone says something and you quote the bible to show them that their opinion is unbiblical). I find the "Internet guys actually helpful and many ministries have been useful. I am grateful that my husband has the rule which i have adopted, which is, "show me where it says that in the bible and i will believe you". I didnt know what i was walking into, and i would warn anyone trying to ask questions to not expect much, ask them questions which you know the answers to biblically and see how they respond to your criticism of their response before you ask for things you are wrestling with
@DaisyPugMama5 ай бұрын
Our bodies have adapted over time. We didn’t become a completely different species or genus.
@amyqb1175 ай бұрын
Exactly! Everytime I have to clarify this. Such man from fish evolution has been debunked but people continue to use the word evolution but to say micro-evolution aka adaptation within the SAME genus or species.