Peter Pan’s Shadow would be great in this deck. Giving evasive to your rush characters combo well with Gruesome and Grim plus he is a solid character in his own right.
@Emerlees9 ай бұрын
just found your channel and i love it!! i’m excited to see more from you
@WintersLorcana9 ай бұрын
I'm excited to have you here :)
@trentosborn88358 ай бұрын
You mentioned a ban. What do you think of Beast Relentless? It’s such a toxic card to play against.
@WintersLorcana8 ай бұрын
You think so? I find that particular version of Emerald Steel to be rather lackluster and on the low end of power level. Beast is the only reason it's even on the radar.
@jacknelson86409 ай бұрын
Love love love
@WintersLorcana9 ай бұрын
These are always fun to play with, awful to play against haha
@DevelopCharacter9 ай бұрын
I hear the talk about banning the fox from bounce. But when locations morph the meta, bounce is going to be weaker… IMHO
@WintersLorcana9 ай бұрын
I'm actually really skeptical that locations, based on what we've seen anyway, won't actually be good. Some could be fantastic and I hope that's the case, but they feel slow and underwhelming right now
@WilliamBush-r2t9 ай бұрын
I played this deck at a local tournament a couple weeks ago. It destroyed my sapphire steel deck
@WintersLorcana9 ай бұрын
The bounce mechanic is busted for sure
@Saintbaileys9 ай бұрын
There is no reason to Nerf Fox. It's not really that powerful. The truth is, theres barely 2 sets out, and the card pool is too small. So the game has simply been solved. As more cards are introduced, newer and older cards will shift in perceived power, and players will call out something else as time elapses.
@WintersLorcana9 ай бұрын
Oh I agree 100%, but that doesn't mean let the game be absolutely commanded by one color until a new set arrives. I've seen other games ban cards as quickly as a few weeks after release to the games benefit. It's too late now perhaps, but a restriction at the very least would have been nice while we wait for the next set
@Saintbaileys9 ай бұрын
@WintersLorcana I also agree. However I still don't think fox or snake are specifically is the issue. They're unplayable without targets. It's the Goats IMHO. You can win in many situations by simply having one in play and not even using them because of the threat they represent. Goat needed to be un-inkable, and or perhaps only gain 1 lore on the way in / out.
@WintersLorcana9 ай бұрын
@@Saintbaileys goat is interesting but mostly harmless without bouncing ability. Perhaps most of the bounce things needed to be uninkable
@Saintbaileys9 ай бұрын
@WintersLorcana perhaps. It may just very well be both cards in tandem. I don't think I've ever seen one without the other in many decks, if at all. Alone, they're okay, but the combo is just brutal. I still say Goat is a menace because you don't have to bounce him either. In many cases, opponents banishing a Goat on their turn could win you the game.
@WintersLorcana9 ай бұрын
@@Saintbaileys I just hope conversations like this lead to a healthy rotating standard and ban/ restricted list. I'd hate to see lorcana become a broken game like some of the others out there
@DizangelMusic9 ай бұрын
So why not play Arthur? Goat plus bibbidi plus Arthur can net you like 7 lore
@WintersLorcana9 ай бұрын
You can totally run Arthur. Pretty sure I've run that deck in the past. I try to run a new deck each day, so this late into st 2 with so few options I'm running out of new decks haha