[1001] The ITL Robotic Safe Cracker! (ITL-2000)

[@psychosin13]

All I can see is R2D2 shutting down the trash compactor on the Death Star.

[@StephenGillie]

All I can hear is a washing machine on agitate.

[@johncage3025]

This is awesome

[@llloyd4]

Then R2D2 spends sometime with the Death Star AI and thus BB8 was born. :D

[@NorseGraphic]

I laughed reading your post about shutting down the trash-compactor. LPL got his hands on R2-D2, and now I wonder where C3P-O are hidden...

[@Youtubeforcedmetochangemyname]

Haha yeah it does look like that

[@FlightRecorder1]

Makes sense that the longest it ever takes him to crack a lock is when a robot replaces him

[@reppy0757]

Lol

[@k.lamareyev4418]

Hahaha

[@Motojoe23]

And he still had to give the robot two of the three to make it a fair race. 😂

[@Jb-ek2hs]

Has he created a video where he cracks a safe combo without the use of a machine?

[@Chris_BIiss]

You can use a stethoscope, I've witnessed my uncle open one

[@Integr8d]

The display should say, “Hmm. Nothing on 2...”

[@Cransridge2288]

🤣

[@und4287]

There should be an "LPL mode".

[@sophiegrey9576]

Click on 3...

[@AutistiCat2406]

Integr8d 5 is binding...

[@fabrizio_sant]

4 is loose

[@brett4569]

I originally thought this was using sensors to detect the most faint inner moments and do it fast, but it was a brute force method lol

[@mangoesnandos4412]

So it tries every possible combination?

[@RicardoDelfinGarcia]

@@mangoesnandos4412 yes, basically. Hence the multi-hour solution

[@RobbyBlitz]

I had the exact same thought!

[@Gregarian]

Violence, if it doesn't work at first u probably didn't use enough of it

[@PinheadLarry1337]

Exactly my thoughts. A lot less fancy when it is just trying every possible combination.

[@oluenionloppu]

what i heard: "these things costs thousands of dollars, but not when they are stored behind a standard padlock"

[@davesstuff1599]

That is an excellent point.

[@r.pizzamonkey7379]

lmao

[@eppyeppy9851]

R. pizzamonkey lmao

[@MMD88]

JJ H lmao

[@VARPYGAMER]

tousands of dollar? It's like a 10 minutes programm and a 20€ Nema23 motor. Im really confused

[@0x0404]

"If brute force doesn't work you are not using enough of it."

[@shoelessscott]

Micah Chase “Ain’t nothing a bigger hammer can’t solve.”

[@jamesdevrees8663]

If it won' t move, force it. If it breaks, it needed fixing anyway."

[@Ferndalien]

This is the mathematical kind of brute force, not the mechanical kind of brute force. It's the same brute force method that is about the only approach to breaking many kinds of encryption where you know the algorithm but it doesn't matter, hammers don't help, so you have to guess the key. So you start going through every possible key and hope and pray you are really, really lucky and find the key in your lifetime. Or use thousands of computers to try thousands of keys at the same time.

[@McCurtainCounty888]

Never force anything!!! Just use a bigger hammer.

[@Cenentury0941]

@@McCurtainCounty888 yes, negotiate with a bigger hammer. Diplomacy always works.

[@BlarghMeow]

And here I was thinking this was some high tech super sensitive equipment that could sense the tumblers as it dialed

[@jimgee5854]

I would think that monitoring the acoustics from the lock would allow a smart machine to use a technique other than brute force

[@anononomous]

I assumed there'd be some sort of super sensitive electronic feedback sensor from the motor that would allow it to automate some of the techniques used by humans to unlock them quicker prior to brute force. I suppose though unless you're using this for some time constrained (and thus maybe nefarious use) a day or so of running doesn't matter much so the (probably substantial) extra expense and complication doesn't make sense.

[@Chuchumm]

*BEEP BOOP* CLICK. OUT. OF. TWO.

[@spencerschulz8399]

Ya me to cant believe its just a auto dialer

[@tonybrock5288]

@@NFLYoungBoy223 It looks like that link has shut itself down because it thinks it's undergoing an "online attack" with all the people clicking on it :-)

[@joshroberts5540]

Skips over the assembly of the machine because “that’s the boring part”. Proceeds to show video of the machine spinning the knob for 2 minutes straight.

[@Cent51]

😂😁😀, think it the same thing and then we could of ended up watching for 8h to 30h to see it actaully work. 😂😁

[@acblaze3116]

Agreed

[@naturesinterface6663]

The channel's about lock picking. Respect to LPL for not cramming every video with bullshit to hit 10 minutes.

[@uppityglivestockian]

I found it fascinating and noticed that I was picking up patterns and started to map them.

[@forcesightknight]

The "boring" part is on a totally different unit

[@JerryRigEverything]

Man. I want one of these and I don't even have a safe to unlock.

[@ItayBarzelai]

Whats up jerry?

[@helper_bot]

you may not have a safe to unlock but a device to open lol

[@spiritedguy2]

Jerry, you have a diverse set of interests.

[@N0Xa880iUL]

I'm surprised this doesn't have more likes.

[@dishantkumarpathak3326]

That display would surely scratch at a level 3 or 4

[@PsycheXI]

I started hearing "covered in vegetables."

[@JohnnyQuickdeath]

What the fuck me too

[@geyotepilkington2892]

thats creepy as fuck. god knows what that poor robot went through :(

[@ArkenX7]

I cant stop hearing it after reading this comment

[@danjordan4681]

NO WHY DID YOU SAY THAT :C

[@randylizotte]

I can hear it too ahha

[@ARitzCracker]

awh, I was expecting something that somehow listened for clicks, but automating a brute force attack is still pretty neat.

[@dylanisaac1017]

Not worth thousands of dollars tho

[@ARitzCracker]

@@dylanisaac1017 the secret is to start a locksmith business with zero skill, and charge people to essentially rent the machine. ROI is approx 12 customers

[@bunnymerlin]

Yea

[@helper_bot]

well if you forgot your safe password you can rent this for some money, that's what they call bussiness

[@TimLF]

How does it know it's found the correct combination if not by sound?

[@mtadams2009]

I worked for a large safe manufacture back in the day. They made large walk in bank vaults. Sometimes banks would lose their combinations and we would call this man in from Ohio. He had his own plane and would be there in hours. Sometimes he would use a machine like this often he would just drill it. He would put one small hole in the vault. He had records on every vault and he knew the drilling location. He also had the best tools money could buy. He was a legend. He charged 10,000 per opening. One year we used him three times.

[@ClutterLustRott]

thats sick, but how come banks are losing their combos that often?

[@Mikasks]

@@ClutterLustRott i think the bank combinations change very often and there’s no way one person would be able to remember it again and again. Source: my opinion

[@ashakydd1]

@@Mikasks This answer makes a lot of sense. My source: working in an office where our passwords had to be changed 4 times a year so over half the staff and their password on a post it somewhere on their desk.

[@davi3455]

Also, safes can fail to hold their “programmed” combination. It does happen.

[@biomorphic]

@@ashakydd1 People think changing password every 3 months, or even force to reinsert the same password every 2 weeks is a way to improve security. On the contrary, it forces a user to use different password he will forger, and to do what you described. Also, forcing a user to reinsert the password every two weeks, make him an easy target for phishing. In conclusion, a password should never expire, and a session neither.

[@pranavp.a1200]

My crime partner : **whispering** How long is it gonna take? Me :* *also whispering** Give me 8 hours **machine dialing noises** * *awkwardly stare at each other for 8 hours**

[@LancasterResponding]

Pr P.A Hour 4 *Leans in for a kiss* “Dude what the fuck?” Stares awkwardly at floor for 4 more hours

[@misakamikoto8785]

@@LancasterResponding 3 hours later... "So... are we there yet, you know we broke in the store with no alarm triggered but it's 7am in the morning now and they open at 8..."

[@charadremur333]

@@misakamikoto8785 1 hr later: nobody showed up because there was a gas leak and you didn't know, just as the safe opens you get blown up.

[@Treblaine]

This would have made sense in the movie Die Hard where supposedly it took about 8 hours to drill into a safe, would make more sense that it took about that long to use an auto-dialler like this.

[@grandmasteryodaordarthsidi4926]

@@charadremur333 but this is a cartoon and you don't die

[@JTMusicbox]

When I started watching I presumed the machine would be slower than you personally are at opening locks, but I was surprised to learn how much slower!

[@XenoTravis]

I thought it would do something fancy other than brute force

[@aritakalo8011]

@@XenoTravis It doesn't need to. Since it isn't designed for clandestine safe cracking. Rather it is designed for lock smiths who get the rather nasty customer call of "We have a really high end safe and forgot the combination". A) high end safes usually have drill lockups (the the glass plates), so no using the standard option..... Just easily drill it with locksmiths drill gear. B) Brute force cutting and drill would take time C) it might destroy the contents and contents is what customer wants D) high end safes are expensive so if you can avoid destructive entry, customer would be really really happy to get to continue to use the expensive asset. So dialer it is. Locksmith shows up with the dialer, sets it up, asks if there is any idea even on part of the code, tells those tips as starting point for the machine and then leaves the dialer to work and says to customer "This might take a day. Call me when that box goes DING and says dialing complete, code is...... I will come pack up my gear, set a new combination and you have again a working safe". Hence it being slow doesn't mean anything. Since most likely the dialer is working in front of the customer and could be working days on end anyway.

[@jmr]

It's no slower then an idiot that forgot his combination 😂

[@Zendigor]

Milktank ™ f

[@MGlBlaze]

Well, it is a brute force approach, so you're dealing with "worse case scenario" for cracking a code. But it's also automated so you can set it and leave it to do its thing for a while.

[@MalleusSemperVictor]

"I already skipped the boring part where I laid hands on the safe and it whispered the first two numbers to me."

[@ukp42]

The Safe Whisperer !

[@davidcompanion814]

This is the lock picking lawyer and i would like your combination.. that is all i have for you.

[@xoniq-vr]

I bet it cried the numbers in fear, when LPP opens a box with a lock or safe, it scares the shit out of it.

[@carstekoch]

@@xoniq-vr In lock world there is this old legend about a faceless creature who will crack every lock be it large and heavy or tiny and light. All that remains are open, gutted lock bodies. Luckily it's just a fairy tale though

[@PandaCake978]

It's not even his safe. He found it just sitting in the back of someone's locked closet in a locked room in a house with two locked front doors. Just begging to be taken

[@50srefugee]

I seem to remember a James Bond movie where 007 attaches something like this to a safe, gets it going, and then sits down with a magazine....fade out...fade in...clickety clack! So at least they tried to indicate Q's toy wasn't out right magic.

[@gerhardkoschany1087]

I had the same thought! Just commented it stating the movie and exact time where that machine is used.

[@johnmiltonda583]

It was a Playboy mag... that's why they had the fade out... (cencored) ...and fade in.

[@rob6231981]

That was 'You Only Live Twice' featuring the great Sean Connery

[@Dgoshy]

@@rob6231981 *On Her Majesty’s Secret Service. George Lazenby

[@rob6231981]

@@Dgoshy That may be so, but it was first done in 'You Only Live Twice' when 007 needed documents from the safe of Mr Osato.

[@EaglePicking]

Funny how this attack is called "brute-forcing" in cryptography, but in the case of an actual safe it's a very soft approach to opening it compared to other, way more brutal ways.

[@matthoward8546]

yep

[@zagreus5773]

I guess brute forcing a combination and brute forcing a safe are slightly different techniques 😅

[@louisrobitaille5810]

If you understand "brute-force method" as "a method to go through something no matter how long it takes" then it's pretty accurate in all cases. Brute forcing a message, a hash, a key, etc is just going through all possible combinations until you find the right one. Same thing for locks. If you brute force your way through a door, you're most likely using a ram (that's where the expression "ramming through" comes from btw, although the origin is actually medieval rams). If you brute force your way through enemy defenses, you're doing it literally, etc.

[@thewhitefalcon8539]

@@louisrobitaille5810 yeah but brute force also means smashing things with hammers instead of entering the combination

[@LLyric_]

Its still brute forcing

[@Nogarda_]

It’s no joke when this is one of the longer videos you’ve done of opening a lock in a good while.

[@Plugh13]

Nogarda it could have gone the full 8 hours

[@DrLeroyGreen]

Its operation sounds like it's saying, "Someone will pay for this".

[@kaiserwaffen6818]

The robots are taking over

[@ying190]

Or “I need to take a poo”

[@theyoshi202]

Or “duh duh dundunduh duh” Maybe I have no imagination but that’s all I hear

[@asura7941]

@@ying190 thanks thats far better

[@jearlblah5169]

i can't unhear it

[@davidlongman2341]

Clever part of this would be to find a safe to open where you would not be disturbed by the owner for at least 30 hours.

[@Bawbag0110]

Over a long weekend maybe

[@catfish552]

If you're really sneaky, you could do multiple sessions, and feed it any digits it figured out previously.

[@InvagPrune]

My immediate thought was the Hatton garden heist, but then i realised that in that case it was faster and easier to drill

[@andysPARK]

Presumably, thieves would steal the safe and do this somewhere else..

[@sourcererseven3858]

@@catfish552 But it doesn't figure out the digits progressively, does it? It did recognize the giant click when the lock opened, yes, but does it detect the faint clicks if one of the wheels is in a gate? Manufacturers surely try to make these clicks as hard to detect a possible, while the giant "I'm now open" click doesn't realy need to be disguised.

[@milesvoss1406]

It's called the itl 2000 cause "it'll take 2000 hours"

[@kimalexander4083]

I've used one of these many times. It usually doesn't take long on a safe that has the combination changed for different people because they love to use dates like birthdays. Start it and come back the next morning and open the safe.

[@reppy0757]

@@kimalexander4083 Well, I can cross this off my wish list for tools to rob my bank with

[@psisis7423]

HAH why aren't all jokes like this

[@hardwirecars]

@hi there some one steal something you left in a safe box?

[@seantaggart7382]

@@hardwirecars Yeah probably did *I'll get it back*

[@TrondBørgeKrokli]

Thank you for always ending your outro with "and have a nice day.", because that can sometimes be all it takes for me to think positive thoughts before I go on to doing something else worthwhile. Also thank you for your calm and soothing voice, it usually makes me feel relaxed when I would otherwise feel stressed or uneasy.

[@benmarkus3675]

I hope your days have been great!

[@incineratorium]

"doing something else worthwhile.." like applying these knowledge someplace? Lol.

[@kacey797]

@@incineratorium 😉🤣🤣🤣🤣👍

[@nuggie3905]

Dramatic as fuuuuck...

[@kacey797]

@@nuggie3905 LMFAO 🤣

[@billgatesaf9542]

"This is the lockpicking lawyer" *Chasity Belt drops to the floor*

[@Sirenhound]

So you've watched his Valentine's videos too? I see you are a man of culture.

[@kamalakrsna]

hahahaaa

[@nathanstautzenberger8381]

robin of loxley and maid marian could have used his skills

[@Maxumized]

Bruce Weeks Is one sly dog man...

[@arbitrage2141]

He's a leg opener

[@saminamanat]

the fact that he makes videos with things like this make me never get bored of this channel. always something interesting

[@MrNuclearGuy]

"I've already skipped the boring part..." Sir, nothing you do is boring.

[@h110hawk]

I was disappointed he skipped all of the setup!

[@broken_font1881]

Building it is half the fun!

[@seantaggart7382]

Yeah BESIDES the fun part is the building and how it opens its like payday 2

[@pulga961]

Not boring,but DANGEROUS. I catched my son lockpicking and he told me that he learnt that skill by watching this chanell...

[@broken_font1881]

@@pulga961 good he is developing a very useful skill. You should encourage his behavior not prohibit it 🙂

[@RumbleFish69]

"Hurry R2, we're dying in here!"

[@MrMud900]

Just use some c4 haha

[@hectornonayurbusiness2631]

😅😅😅

[@afterbusters134]

r2 sucks, just use bb8

[@nevanoconnell3356]

Be there in 8 hours

[@michaelzz6993]

@@afterbusters134 dont mention anything from the sequel trilogy 🤢

[@wzr3293]

*“The Thermal Drill, Go Get It”*

[@user-fi2zs2ww1r]

WZR the thermal drill:

[@Mr.Brownstone1987]

*guys the thermal drill, go get it*

[@rickaaay3938]

PD FTW

[@louisdugrain]

HOXTON !! CHAINS

[@freezetv6837]

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

[@homemmpa]

It was around 2:05 when I became aware that I was staring at a machine turning a knob for a decent amount of time and realized I can be entertained with anything. Kept watching because it's LPL, it's always good. I could probably have watched the 8h video.

[@kw0060]

"I'm not going to make an 8 hour long video" *disappointed face*

[@netking66]

A moviemaker was having a tiff with the UK censor's office. He submitted a 10 hour movie of paint drying. A fee is only payable if the movie is classified adult only or similar. Wonder what the censor would think of a 8 hour safecracking movie with this device.

[@dmorley100]

I remember several years ago when we got a gun safe and the combination we had for the safe didn’t work. We called the locksmith and he put a rig like this on the dial to try and find the combination, and the rig he had was noisy as hell. What really sucked was it took the machine 3 days running nonstop to find the combination, so it was pure hell trying to sleep with that thing running. This ones quiet as can be compared to that one.

[@dmorley100]

Mike Bartley and what sucked even beyond that, I forgot to put this in my original comment, is that the combination it wound up finding didn’t work either. Locksmith had to put a whole new dial on it.

[@dmorley100]

H M in hindsight, that would’ve been an EXCELLENT idea 🤣

[@TheZacdes]

You needed Jeff Sitar,lol. He cracks bank vaults by hand very fast, check him out!

[@ccall48]

@@TheZacdes According to a few other videos Jeff passed away last year.

[@TheZacdes]

@@ccall48 magic sense of touch on the guy, could have made a mint opening safes but honest as they come. Ime tempted to say 'dumb" as they come but you cant knock a guy for having integrity[personally i dont think enough of banks and their practices to NOT be willing to take their money if i had those skills and nobody was getting hurt]:/

[@Gremriel]

"The picking robot BosnianBill and I made.."

[@Petertronic]

😆😆😆

[@ClickLikeAndSubscribe]

One can likely make this with an Arduino controller and stepper motor after figuring out the motion pattern.

[@knightmarex13]

@@ClickLikeAndSubscribe pretty sure I have seen those builds a few years back either with Arduino's or raspberry pi's

[@Timooooooooooooooo]

@@knightmarex13 I believe Samy Kamkar made something like that

[@陳秉軒-c9b]

Literally the first thing that came to my mind when I saw the thumbnail lol

[@DAS-Videos]

Years ago my sister found a combination lock, the type used on school lockers, and over the course of days we went through each combination sequentially. We finally got it open. It had 01-99 numbers, and a 3 number combination.

[@leon_oberti]

So what it does is the same we all thought: trying every possible combination until it works lol

[@MichaelPohoreski]

The technical term is _Brute-force_

[@FishSnackems]

Thats actually a common attack

[@StofStuiver]

@@MichaelPohoreski No its not We call this brute force in the IT world, where you hack a server over a network. Obviously brute force comes from using brutal physical force.... as in taking a sledgehammer or something to the device. Since this is a safe, not a far away server, brute force would be exactly that; brute force. Not trying all possibilities.

[@MichaelPohoreski]

@@StofStuiver Yes it is. > The attacker systematically checks all possible passwords and passphrases until the correct one is found.

[@StofStuiver]

@@MichaelPohoreski No, its not. I just explained it ffs. BRUTE FORCE comes from FORCING a device/door/etc, instead of using normal method (key for instance) to gain entry to a device. The term crossed over to networking as forcing a login/pass by trying all possibillities. Since its not really an option to physically go there and open a server. You cant friggin cross over back to where it came from and change the original meaning!!!!! Its not rocket science...

[@aldozulfikar54]

Good lord even payday drill is even faster than this machine

[@RobbieHatley]

Well, so is a jackhammer, or a diamond-studded circular saw, or a case of dynamite. But the advantage of the dialing machine is, the safe can still be used afterward. :-)

[@trollobrine2262]

*Drill broken hold to fix*

[@Lachm83]

Robbie Hatley r/woooosh

[@laerzzyziz2381]

@Opecuted its youtube, not reddit who gives a shit about necro.

[@burd2981]

@@Lachm83 shut the fuck up

[@Electric0eye]

ITL-2000 dropping some sick beats tbh

[@KokoroKatsura]

a n i m e n i m e

[@inkman6964]

Sounds like an old printer and the worst partner in crime a bit like having squeaky shoes

[@michaelbuckers]

A Nema17 motor could do the same job and it could be driven from a TMC2209 silent stepstick which makes virtually no noise. Put a flexible coupling on the shaft and some rubber dampeners on the motor mounting bracket and the only thing you'll hear is the lock mechanism clicking. Additionally, these tiny motors produce very sick amount of torque when running 1.4 Amps RMS, and at 24 Volts they can sustain this torque up to 1000 RPM. This thing could literally work 25x faster and be 10x cheaper if they had optimized anything. Source: I'm a 3d printing enthusiast I deal with stepper motors a lot. Dude trust me™.

[@toahero5925]

@@michaelbuckers Would it be precise enough to handle individual combinations?

[@michaelbuckers]

@@toahero5925 A standard stepper is 200 full steps per revolution and 400 half-steps, up to 51 200 microsteps (driver chip feature). It has plenty of accuracy. The limiting factor would be the speed at which the lock internals can operate.

[@robbiejames1540]

@@michaelbuckers I would kinda worry whether a nema 17 (at least 3D printer size) would have the torque for a stiff dial, especially using smoothened steps (source - trying to use one to make a fourth axis for my cnc)

[@michaelbuckers]

@@robbiejames1540 How stiff a dial we're talking about? Nema17 motors provide enough torque for your fingers to slip off the knob unless you really hold tight. Also check your RMS current setting. As a rule of thumb, if the motor isn't hot to touch, it's not running enough current. Also of course longer motors provide more power, puck motors are pretty weak so don't use them for anything that requires nontrivial thrust.

[@zachary9706]

I’m rather upset that the robot doesn’t say “click out of one....2nd pin setting...”

[@Cocytus]

The machine actually holds a good rhythmic tune. I can groove to this. 😂

[@priceburnett]

Lookup stepper motor music.

[@iwanabana]

"So many locks - to pick!"

[@Addsomehappy]

@@priceburnett Floppy drive music is also pretty cool

[@GD-tt6hl]

Lockpickinglawyer asmr.

[@bloodmoongrizzlythefirst6492]

be a good DJ.

[@weareanonymous353]

Would love to see the vid with that sparrow learning dialler

[@orenyehezqel8178]

See Bosnianbill latest video [1610], he also gives 3 giveaways.

[@alger8181]

Locknoob did a fine video on the Sparrows safe, also.

[@fafarcop9579]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mJqxoJpqhsind9k

[@TheRealFlamingNinja]

Everybody gangsta until the safe door sounding like a dot matrix printer.

[@TimmyDavie]

We had to get someone to use one of these the other day in work (Manifoil Mk8), I wasn't around to see it in use but it's a lot simpler than I thought!

[@charlesturner2546]

Timmy Davie The problem with the Mk8 is there are over 2.5 billion combinations. You'd have to have an idea what the combination is for a machine to ever break into one. The internals fail before the lock will be cracked. A Mk4 lasts about 10 days on a lock dialler before it fails, which is well before all combos are dialled, I would assume a mk8 fails after the same amount of time, so it would never get close to all the combinations because there are x100 more of them. I service these locks daily, so have a lot of experience of them, and especially using brute force to try and get into them.

[@darthkarl99]

@@charlesturner2546 That sounds like one serious safe.

[@PlacidDragon]

"This is the LockPickingLawyer, and i've gotten tired of manually picking locks, so i made a picking robot" :D

[@CoffeeOnRails]

this is probably doable you know...

[@PlatypusVomit]

Let me get the lock picking robot that BosnianBill and I made

[@NFLYoungBoy223]

PlacidDragon offerup.com/item/detail/786631059/

[@vanguardzero6828]

“That bosnian bill and I made”

[@Elberto71]

I swear at 2.11 this thing was saying "you was an accident"

[@237iq6]

Rob Bennett I agree 😂

[@hulem98]

fck can't unhear it

[@baqcasanke]

Yeah i hear it now

[@LaserSharkPhotoablations]

it sounds like "gimme that vegetable" to me lol

[@russellfernandez57]

2:11

[@justasydefix6251]

Fun fact: LPL just picked it while looking at it and felt pity for the machine so he gave it hits

[@FriktionMedia]

LPL whilst it's working "there was a click out of two... You sure 4 isn't binding?"

[@Kindiah]

I was expecting it to use special sensors to detect the right numbers by feel or sound not by going through every number; no wonder it takes so long.

[@protonjinx]

having a proper brute force machine to fall back on if smart methods fail is a good thing.

[@floatinggoose9197]

Same

[@Adierit]

Gotta think about the application this is used in. It's almost certainly used exclusively by people who need to crack a safe they either forget the combination to, or acquired it locked to begin with. As such the times it's needed are very rarely, therefore speed isn't really much of a concern as you just set it to run then go on with your day, and come back when it's finished.

[@kendarr]

This is called brute forcing

[@NdMoreSpd1.0]

@@kendarr this isn't brute force by any means. When you review safes and their ratings (including the locks used on them) they are rated against surreptitious entry (entry without leaving physical evidence) and forced entry (clear evidence of entry). In this case no "force" is used and if you were to have performed this "surreptitiously" no one would be the wiser once you walked away. (Edit: post-midnight comments and autocorrect don't mix...)

[@Halfzipp]

Sounds like a dot matrix printer lol. Bringing back some memories :)

[@kjamison5951]

The ITL-2000: “Whirr, click, whirr, click, “ The Floppotron: “That’s not a song!”

[@incineratorium]

Man of culture!

[@michaelslater6839]

When I was a young kid I remember opening an old lock combination lock just buy feel.... I close my eyes and turned it till I instinctively knew to stop and then turn it back in and turned it back again all based on feel and instinct. And it opened. It’s amazing how good your hearing And your sense of touch become with your eyes closed...

[@DeadlyDanDaMan]

Cool story bro. You keep thinking you're cool. Maybe someday someone will care.

[@michaelslater6839]

@@DeadlyDanDaMan So says the Highlighted ”King of Pussies” !!! Gee thumb wrestling. Wish I was you. You look about as deadly as a bad case of athletes foot! LOL !

[@reeepingk]

Ahhh, the good ol' brute force method. Love it.

[@TheSiriusEnigma]

This is when i realize that the grading on the dial are just for show. The spacing between possible positions is way more that 1.

[@klausstock8020]

Your observation is correct. It is possible to manufacture this kind of lock with tighter tolerances (which would also makes it less forgiving when you are legit, know the combination and just try to dial it in with clumsy hands). I presume that for most dial locks, you just need to try 50 of the 100 positions. So just 125,000 possible combination for a three disc lock (instead of the 1,000,000 one might expect). I guess the usual fix is not to apply tighter tolerances but to add another disc. 50^4 gives you 6,250,000 possible combinations. Oh, well, my bad. Of course one number must be outside the 0-30 or 0-35 region. so the number of possible combinations is actually only two thirds of the numbers given above.

[@rahuldoes]

The gradually decreasing tempo! How soothing. I dozed off to sleep, listening this machine at work.

[@chazgriffin5582]

Pretty Neat Video! One of the best KZbin creators I've ever come across and I've seen a lot keep up the great work thank you so much

[@LaserSharkPhotoablations]

"gimme that vegetable ..gimme that vegetable ..gimme that vegetable"

[@williamclay190]

I can never ingest this, and I'm not even mad. Thank you, sir

[@dandyandy2046]

you cracked the code!!

[@DrCrowPHD]

“You were an accident... you were an accident...”

[@craig904]

@@DrCrowPHD it's more like "it was an accident"

[@FirstLast-uz6eq]

FUCK YOU GET OUT OF MY HEAD

[@uthoshantm]

Brute force: Strip the safe out of its encasing with a chain attached to a pickup, use a grinder to finish the job.

[@uthoshantm]

@@soundspark Sure, brute force does fail occasionally

[@kain7134]

@@uthoshantm nope, just need a bigger truck

[@andrewt.5567]

This was the idea behind my engineering college project. Safe was heavy enough to resist being moved, even at a small size. Sandwiched an extreme abrasion and heat resistant ceramic tile between mild and hardend steel. Thickness was such that an average sized grinder could not penetrate deep enough. You absolutely could get in, but the goal was to make it either not worth it or risk having the contents destroyed in the process. If the person was not aware of the design of the safe they faced it would prove to be very difficult. It was actually built and tested. The tester had a reason to get in. His Christmas present was inside. He failed after two hours with power tools.

[@uthoshantm]

@@andrewt.5567 The safe WAS the Christmas gift. Seriously, a high end safe should also have a high end locking mechanism, otherwise what's the point?

[@Scootertuner420]

I know you americans also allowed to have shitty safes. But in other countries this may not work, because there are regulations, that you can pull out a safe with a truck.

[@firstnlastnamethe3rd771]

*It Sounded Like:* "Gotta get in to this" "Gotta get in to this" "Gotta get in to this" That's what I'd be saying, too.

[@kinga6347]

Now I can't get it out my mind

[@JoshRShupe]

😂😂😂😂

[@teodelfuego]

"Maybe we flip for this"

[@CiscoStrategicStudie]

Can not be unheard...

[@silvercrypto4284]

So funny

[@michaelchristensen6884]

When I was in the military I use to set the safe codes. I was told by the master locksmith that it is best to set the numbers low/high/low because it is easier to mess up the sequence when dialing the numbers when trying to hack the safe.

[@Kinkajou1015]

I want to see the 8 hour video of this thing cracking a safe. I also want that manipulation trainer, it would be a great fidgeting doodad.

[@mothlastname2413]

Dont take one from people who will actually use it because you want a toy you will get bored of in a day

[@Kinkajou1015]

@@mothlastname2413 You know, I had no intention of entering whatever contest Bosnian Bill is running... until your comment.

[@michelevitarelli]

I think youtube will allow you to upload a ten hour long video. Someone should post the entire video.

[@joebolling]

You lost me on how it knows when it has the right combination. How does it know when to stop?

[@alexfernandez8083]

When it hits the last number it senses the resistance and stops.

[@Mekhanic1]

@@alexfernandez8083 I have combo locks and don't understand... I could put in any code/right or wrong and don't feel any resistance.. ?

[@killer2600]

On these locks when the combination is correct turning the dial clockwise past zero retracts the bolt and freezes the dial from turning further. The device can detect the halted motion to know when it has unlocked the lock. It tests whether turning clockwise past zero freezes the dial (i.e. has unlocked the lock) after each code it dials. If the dial doesn't freeze then it continues trying combinations because the lock has not unlocked.

[@christi_L]

@@killer2600 thanks for the explanation. I think it's weird that a crummy rotary dial master lock doesn't stop when you dial the right combo, but these fancy safes do. Seems like a flaw!

[@mandowarrior123]

@@christi_L not when it takes 30 hours. A hand saw would have it open in under an hour, with fresh hands and fresh saws. This tool is specifically for someone who wants their safe opened and intact.

[@Lukashoffmann94]

So why does a motor with an interface and a software that iterates over all possiblilities cost over 1000$?

[@Rsharlan3]

I figure you're not paying for the hardware, but for the present value of future cashflows.

[@PeppercornVR]

With an arduino and a little programming and engineering skills you could probably knock one of these out for less than $200

[@weswheel4834]

@@PeppercornVR Presumably reliability comes into the cost as well. It would be a shame if it fell apart after the first 4 hours. (Would be an interesting project though).

[@TheRainHarvester]

I can make one without the magnets and coupler!

[@ZiggyTheHamster]

You're not accounting for the R&D that had to go into this niche product. If you want to make a DIY dialer for free using off the shelf Arduinos and Chinese stepper motors, there's nothing stopping you.. but it'd be tough to call that a product.

[@stewkingjr]

All it needs now is a voice saying, "I've got a click on one..."

[@dando541]

2 is binding...

[@sinuslebastian6366]

Nothing on 3...

[@jakelance6]

"4 is set... And we've got it...."

[@Monster3Games]

Just take the like ....

[@tomhejda6450]

At 8 hours of pause-less dialling, how much does inner heat, friction and wear become an issue? Can't you jam the lock?

[@Smittel]

alternatively, you just spin the entire mechanism at a couple thousand RPM and wear it out

[@intothecalm420]

Would that unlock the safe though? That would be very easy to accomplish.

[@aniceboxofkraftmacandchees5544]

Crawl IntoTheCalm not really that easy lol

[@Smittel]

@@intothecalm420 it wouldn't. before you would open the safe with that you would friction weld it all together.

[@VI-pp4jo]

@@Smittel Huh... What if you freeze it? P. S. Am I hired?

[@klausstock8020]

@@VI-pp4jo You might be able to break the combination lock that way. Unfortunately, it would also break the mechanism which keeps some spring loaded arms in position (heat and deformation will break it as well). The arms will then move from the ordinary position into a position which will keep the door shut. Really shut. Shut in the sense that even the locks are overruled and cannot be used to open the door any more. You will then need to cut the door (or the walls) into pieces (which might take days, and is noisy).

[@MrPLC999]

So, on other videos, we see that this device opens a safe apparently by trying every possible combination. That's what I call brute force.

[@christiangeiselmann]

I call it patience.

[@ClarinoI]

@@christiangeiselmann It's literally the impatient way to brute force crack the combination..

[@ericwes7351]

I was curious how the Sparrows knew it got the right combination? Does it hear the "clunk"? My safe does not clunk with the last correct number... In my safe's case, the handle would also need to be tried, after each combination.

[@RomualdFlibustier]

I was wondering : How does the robot detect that he found the good number ? Is it able to detect micro-vibration or stuff like this ?

[@AutistiCat2406]

Romuald Flibustier it doesn’t It runs numbers over and over until it happens to get the combo right

[@iamtherealzombie]

@@AutistiCat2406 I would guess that is an incorrect assumption as it stopped once it got the right number, stating it was complete.

[@RomualdFlibustier]

@@jhutchison8096 Well it make sense. Thanks for looking it up ;)

[@peterday9200]

I can see at least two ways it could detect a correct combo: When you hit the right combo you then turn the dial clockwise to pull the bolt. That takes a known number of degrees of movement of the dial. The machine attempts to drive the dial further than that known amount, but if the combo is correct then the machine cannot drive further and and the discrepancy between the acheived drive angle and commanded drive angle will manifest as an error signal in the positional feedback loop. Alternatively, because it takes more power to drive the wheel to open the lock the increase in motor drive current needed to maintain angular rate will signal a success.

[@goprojoe7449]

No it's dumb as possible. It just tries every possible combination of numbers lmao doesn't even know when one is correct.

[@DJRonnieG]

Boyhood dream come true. I did indeed assume this was only ever seen in my movies and fictitious until recently. By the time someone got a Arduino to tune a guitar... then again the hours this machine takes does match the reality of not having your cake and eating it too.

[@BrianSu]

This thing better have non-volatile memory so you can resume the job in the event of a power failure

[@johnremcastro]

Non-volatile memory isn't the solution to power failures. That's what a UPS is for. If you are doing this professionally and can afford this kind of tool, then you should also be able to get a UPS.

[@russellv6234]

@@johnremcastro or both. If the new ones have bluetooth, im sure they have memory haha

[@omniyambot9876]

I think it does together with ram. Plus it also have battery so you don't need a UPS. but it's low capacity so you better write it down.

[@sirpretzel822]

Others in the comments have mentioned that a device like this could be improved by using sound or the resistive force of the lock as feedback, but I always thought it would be cool to use magnetic induction sensors of some sort to sense the position of the notches on the disks. If a notch passes under the sensor, the magnetic field would slightly change, with some software magic, you could use that to decode the lock. It would likely need highly sensitive sensors and complicated software but it could theoretically take down locks made with high tolerances that would be difficult to feel out with tactile feedback

[@the-dullahan]

You're going to have an incredibly difficult time sensing discrepancies in magnetic fields of brass wheels, inside of an aluminum lock, through 12+ inches of steel, my guy.

[@DragonsREpic]

Just use a payday drill *Drill jammed for the 5th time* DAMN WANKAH!

[@Phoenix258]

"I'm not going to make an eight hour video". Excuse me but this is what we subscribed for. Don't get lazy now you have a gold button.

[@DrewIsARealBoy]

*AVG TIME TO PICK LOCK* LPL: 30 seconds Machine: 30 Hours

[@MisterJackTheAttack]

Well LPL doesn't try literally every number.

[@DrewIsARealBoy]

@@MisterJackTheAttack shhh dont be a dark cloud an a post thats ment to make people laugh

[@daanbreur]

sooo true

[@EuphoricBloodLust]

So AI still has some catching up to do to match (much less beat) Biological Intelligence...

[@penfold7800]

I think probably more like 30minuites for LPL.

[@SpectreAnimations]

If I may ask, is 1957 someone's birth date and 63 someone's age for the combination on the safe?

[@megan00b8]

What is this detective bolognese??

[@tuvelat7302]

Listening to this baby is how LPL gets to sleep at night.

[@31415geon]

That's the cutest little scroll chuck I've seen in a while.

[@g0fvt]

It would be fun to consider a lock designed to defy this type of attack, maybe with torque limiting clutches to defy the fast changes of direction. Perhaps a centrifugal device to resist fast rotation.

[@_--_--_]

Or add a single additional gate and the solving time of this machine goes up from 8hrs to 1-2 months.

[@athensmorningstar7809]

Nah the issue is if it was a heist it is just impractical to use It takes a good bit of time to set up and it takes quite awhile to use And it's kinda klunky And it's expensive It's just not very practical for a criminal to use Hence the main use case for this is probably if the owner of the safe forgot their passcode and wanted a non destructive way to enter the safe So it doesn't make sense to design the safe to impede the device imo

[@the-dullahan]

And no one would buy that lock, because this device isn't spinning any faster than a bank teller spins a lock, and there would be repeat calls to the bank's vault technicians over a lock "not working" simply because they were going too fast. Congrats, you just designed the worst lock ever.

[@g0fvt]

@@the-dullahan I wrote that 3 years ago, a practical bank vault lock does not really have to resist an attack like this. At most I would guess that a vault will be unattended for a maximum of maybe 5 days so there is a limit to how many stepper motor driven combinations could be tried in that time. Sadly the quickest way into it is to kidnap those that do have access, but that falls outside the challenge of lock picking...

[@the-dullahan]

@@g0fvt LOL bro went from one nonsensical idea to another. Kidnapping would have an even lower likelihood of success than your other BS idea.

[@AlphaSeagull]

I get the feeling that LPL could've just picked it faster

[@arthurnonimus]

What I want to know is how does it sense the feedback from the lock?

[@lanthan598]

it doesn't, it just bruteforces it

[@Swoopiny]

@@lanthan598 It must sense some sort of feedback, though, or it wouldn't know whether it is unlocked or not after an attempt

[@omniyambot9876]

@@lanthan598 what

[@eirenwhelan3312]

‘I’ve skipped the boring part’ - *proceeds with 2 mins of watching the dial spin

[@ErbiumErbium]

Eiren Whelan Hey...it was entertaining to watch, to see such a robotic process.

[@H.EL-Othemany]

That wasn't boring for me

[@Tony_Ey_O_Badabing]

I actually laughed my ass of at this comment, granted I’ve had a couple beers, but still humorous.

[@oguretsagressive]

4:49 Safe manufacturers: "OMG, LPL has got to the safes! We must quickly give him something else to play with or we're all screwed".

[@clotho5437]

As a software and hardware dev i instantly recognized this as a mechanical brute forcer. Now, i have something to build when I'm bored.

[@huskerbusker]

This is the LockPickingRobot, and I have another 8 hour video for you today. Let's see what brute forced combination opens our lock today.

[@JoshWright396]

Assuming there is an equal probability of any combination, it seems like it would be faster to test the combinations in order of quickest to slowest.

[@sylviaelse5086]

I think it would have to keep unwinding to reset the lock in that case, so that it would not be faster.

[@fffuuu]

Also it's possible to decrease brute force time if he count last 3 numbers. For instance in when he check 123124 he also already checked 231 and 312 and they can be skipped later

[@sylviaelse5086]

@@fffuuu I don't think that works. Sucessive numbers are moving different wheels internally, to there is no such equivalence. The strategy you propose works on some key pads that have no reset, and merely look for the right sequence of numbers in succession.

[@stargazer7644]

It is fastest not having to redial all 3 digits every time. That's the way it does it.

[@ElmerFuddGun]

I'm not seeing it *reset* before dialing a new combination. Why? And watching at 0.25x I don't see it dialing the first two numbers (63 & 19). I only see the last number stop. Can you run it slower?

[@stargazer7644]

Because that isn't necessary, and it takes longer.

[@homanvideos]

Where is his accent from? I guess there are still people who speak English in the US. Or is it Canadian English?

[@bf945]

It sounds like the robot tries every combination rather then sensing when the tumblers line up. But how did it know when the last combo was correct?

[@briant7265]

My question too.

[@colinmacvicar2507]

Yeah you’d think it would have to try the door each time.

[@stopthebus]

Off memory - with these locks when the last number is hit, the dial stops (meets resistance). The stepper motor will try to rotate again to do the next number attempt (not knowing it has already hit it) and because it meets the resistance, the current draw rises significantly. The circuitry detects this and presumes it has found the last number.

[@baronvonlimbourgh1716]

Yeah. It is just a brute force attack. Good enough thoug, these will mostly be cracking dead peoples safes anyway. Or from suspects for police or something. There is no time constraint really.

[@colinmacvicar2507]

S W Is what you’re saying that if you know the first two numbers you wouldn’t need to know the last number? You’d just need to spin the dial till it stopped?

[@VitaKet]

Gotta love these guys, on their site it says; "Q: Once open can I keep things inside it … like a lighter and grinder?"

[@joe-e-geo]

So it's just a mechanized bruce-forcing machine??? I would think that with a bit more technology such as being able to "feel" or "hear" the gears/dials/whatever it would solve the combo faster.

[@larsprins3200]

I was hoping for an explanation of how this robot knows when the combination is correct. I can only see that it tries combinations systematically but the feedback part remains a mystery. There is no arm attempting to turn the opening handle, for instance. What am I missing? Is it listening for clicks?

[@astersfun]

Probably just a lock that engages at the correct combination. When all 3 discs align it grabs the bar and locks up the dial. Motor has an encoder to detect the missed steps.

[@tedwingate]

@@astersfun there has to be more to it or else the third number would just be a matter of slowly turning the dial until it comes to a hard stop.

[@AJ-hm9im]

“Maybe it will beep when it’s done, like a microwave” -Tyson

[@josephmartin4643]

Did you bring back memories! I had to use one of these on a safe that had no markings and we were afraid that it was a jewelry safe that had a glass relocker system. I installed the unit and couldn't sit there to wait for it because I had other service calls to take care of. The banker that I was opening the safe for, saw it stop and ended up unplugging the unit and tried to open the safe. Why, I have no idea so I had to run it again. I ended up having to change the lock because this thing really turns fast and when I opened it there was a pile of brass powder in the bottom of the lock. Great unit but yes it does take a long time. Retired now and playing with tumbler locks that I never had the time to learn back then. I really like your channel.

[@evan1238]

I'm surprised the knob doesn't heat up and seize with that thing turning for potentially 30 hours straight

[@gizmoguyar]

Without trying the latch, How does the machine know that it has found the right combination? I don't see any sort of torque sensor or anything else on there.

[@br.raphaelcallahan1451]

There is a major vulnerability point with the S&G safes. It was my first safe that I cracked. I drilled a hole in the back of the safe and inserted a camera with a magnetic head on it and put it on the key hole that resets the combination. This reset is 5 numbers off and you are able to get the combo from the last number to the first when looking through the hole by rotating it through the cycle. Then compensate for the 5 number off set and you have the combination. If you have ever reset you will know what I mean by the 5 number off set. It's what that other white notch is for on top of the dial.

[@the-dullahan]

But considering most vaults have an exterior and interior door plate, and are also not something you're ever going to be able to drill from behind, that's not really that major of a flaw, since you would never be able to get the camera in from the rear that way, and even if you could, you'd never be able to see the lock anyhow.

[@johnwickpick8621]

Additional info: This machine just randomly runs numbers it dont manipulate. Manipulation resistant locks have a added action at the end of dialing like pusinhing in on the dial or turning a knob so the machine cant open that. Also many high end locks have 4 wheels and the macine cant do it bacause instead of a million combintion now theres 100 million combinations. I seen some of you ask how the macine knows when it has the combinaion? Because when a combination is dialed the dial will come to an abrupt Stop. Thats how the macine knows. Thanks.

[@xaosflux]

It seems like a million - however, notice that these locks usually have some tolerance - the robot was incrementing by 2's so instead of 100^3 there are only 50^3 combinations (125K) - add to that that most of the time you will guess it in half the combinations and it lowers it to 63K. Sure there are some locks with much tighter precision that can get the higher number of permutations.

[@briant7265]

A good electronic dial lock will also shut down if it detects "mechanical" dialing (too smooth a turn) or a couple of missed combinations. Then you have to wait a minute for it to reset.

[@johnwickpick8621]

Yes thats true and they also have developed tools to defeat them as well but all that high tech gadgetry is off the wall expensive. Electronic locks are taken over now even though there less reliable. Combintion locks on antique safes over hundred years old still work. Youll never see an electroic lock working that long. Again learning Manipulation is an Art and not a hobby. And on top of all that its not guaranteed. Mechanical locks are not as quick or as easy as E Locks either. Anyone can change there own combo on E locks but not on a mechanical lock. Thanks.

[@johnwickpick8621]

Yes I know the"Real number" is much lower then a million Im just stating manufacturers. There are many numbers you cant even use thats were set and caused lockouts. Yes each lock has its own tolerances and some like old sentry safes will open in 5 increments. You can set the tolernces on that robot and 2 usually covers most locks. But this is wheres its tricky cause that puts you on the edge of a gate and one wrong turn of the diall turn and you just missed it. Thanks

[@briant7265]

@@johnwickpick8621 It depends on the lock. Government security requires certain locks. Combinations can be changed on all of them. The approved S&G 8077 padlock (mechanical) is $300 or so. Their approved mechanical door locks have been swapped out for electronic ones *because* they are more secure. Then again, these are *good* locks made by a stellar company. I have seen what LPL does to electronic locks, so I'm not really arguing with you.

[@atticstattic]

ITL-2000: "That's all I have for you today..."

[@TheAnimeist]

4:48 "If you still have questions ..." Yeah, can you explain the sequence for going through the numbers. For example it appeared the dial was being spun to a target number, then back to 85. 53-85 54-85 55-85. Thank you.

[@tbwkn]

Anyone else vibing along with the beat that it makes?

[@prospersikhwari5289]

Nah, I still prefer the guy with a stethoscope and extremely good hearing.

[@Skywatcher_Official]

You inspired me to start lockpicking! What lock should I move on to now that I’m done with the practice lock that came with my kit?

[@ScottyAlmondjoy]

Apples 056 masterlocks

[@hiteshadhikari]

Start easy Masterlocks 😁

[@Skywatcher_Official]

Ok, thanks!

[@looney15224]

Medeco lol

[@SmallSpoonBrigade]

@@hiteshadhikari Or those old bicycle locks that only required a pen cap to unlock. :-P

[@bendazkt]

I watched my boss open a safe with 4 combination locks on it in 45 minutes. He was a true master.