It took 20 hours, and we opened the lock. Now let's do that again to show it wasn't a fluke...
@Bliblblub2 жыл бұрын
funniest shit ive ever seen
@RealRedditt2 жыл бұрын
Underrated Comment^^
@kartikeyajp82942 жыл бұрын
LMAO
@yuricopperhooves2 жыл бұрын
Well, since what it was doing is brute force guessing all the available combinations till it get it right, it was literally a fluke.
@TechyBen2 жыл бұрын
@@yuricopperhooves Would a fluke not be guessing in less than a brute force manner (say a very small % of possible combination iterations).
@13vatra2 жыл бұрын
I love how LPL's longest video is also the only video where he does nothing.
@mrpw14022 жыл бұрын
464 is over 30 minutes
@Hans-gb4mv2 жыл бұрын
@@mrpw1402 yep, he used to do a lot of 15+ minute videos back in the day.
@ipodguy92 жыл бұрын
😅
@leoraphael12 жыл бұрын
That's because if he cracked it himself the video wouldn't even reach 5 minutes, gotta make the robot feel good about itself
@ATSucks12 жыл бұрын
That's cause he's 1337 LEET!
@pedroakjr23712 жыл бұрын
The noise is the robot saying "nothing on one" two is set" "3 is binding" in robotic language
@hakugin152 жыл бұрын
All I hear is 1000000000000. Oh shit sorry, I meant "yes, no, no, no, no, no, no, no"
@Mrclean43111 ай бұрын
The best comment i have read this week.
@SgtMacKerZ8 ай бұрын
lol
@JunkyardDigs2 жыл бұрын
Surprised the the lock can take 3 days of rotation without burning up!
@zombiewraps2 жыл бұрын
Surprised to see you in the wild. I love the content man.
@RaggedsEdge2 жыл бұрын
Yeah I kept thinking about all the wear this must put on the lock assembly. Can’t be good for it.
@Yuki22042 жыл бұрын
@@RaggedsEdge If you are bruteforcing a lock like this you probably don't care about it surviving to be useful after
@RaggedsEdge2 жыл бұрын
@@Yuki2204 yes I agree that’s probably true.
@andrewthomson2 жыл бұрын
@@Yuki2204 saw one of these used at the bank I worked at when a teller screwed up a combination change. We still used it for years afterwards with no ill effects.
@sunyuchieh21272 жыл бұрын
Me: 11 minute video! The lock must be great! LPL: Brute force guessing
@monomono96272 жыл бұрын
it was hella satisfying doe
@Garlic_Doggo2 жыл бұрын
And it's still great
@Melissanoma2 жыл бұрын
worth noting that it's a zero skill attack. LPL is an expert, but basically anyone can push "start" and brute force a combination.
@carelx70292 жыл бұрын
22 minutes video to prove it''s not a fluke, I''m glad he spared us that.
@UncleKennysPlace2 жыл бұрын
@@Melissanoma Not quite "zero skill". Give me the thing, and I can most likely operate it. Give it to anyone off the street, perhaps not.
@YszapHun2 жыл бұрын
I love how the "robotic cracker" became the 1337th episode.
@DrRedstone1722 жыл бұрын
elite
@smozoltov18802 жыл бұрын
oh shit your right nicee
@ottokiehl54132 жыл бұрын
What's the significance?
@lily133372 жыл бұрын
@@ottokiehl5413 1337 means "leet" as in "elite". It became a kind of language where letters would be replaced with similar looking numbers if applicable. for example, "Hello" would be like "H3110" big joke in gaming communities usually
@TheRealMeaney2 жыл бұрын
it's pronounced "1337est" episode.
@c5dynomite2 жыл бұрын
“Finally, a way for me to sneakily break into safes” Proceeds to be louder than a fax machine
@zerog20002 жыл бұрын
Maybe they make silent stepper motor drivers for this setup? But even safes cylinder/dial mechanism can be noisy itself when operated
@cr4zyj4ck2 жыл бұрын
Thieves don't usually use this type of machine - it's main use is situations where the legitimate owner of the safe would like it opened non destructively but forgot the combination and an expert safecracker isn't available.
@MikeLitty692 жыл бұрын
@@cr4zyj4ck or if say you know the owner is away for a few days and you want access to his safe👀
@volkerracho59542 жыл бұрын
@@zerog2000 Trinamic stepper drivers are pretty good. They are very silent and also come with other cool features like detecting stall by measuring back EMF, also with load-dependent current control (motors will run cooler) and much more. I wonder how much that robot cost.. it looks like it is some kind of prototype (3d printed parts)
@hackish12 жыл бұрын
I expect a real servo motor would be superior. They are faster, quieter and can be more accurately programmed. The downside is that they are more expensive.
@Theoddert Жыл бұрын
Just imagine walking through your office at night and hearing what sounds like a 3D printer, going to the safe room and finding this thing whirring away on its own
@irishdrunkass Жыл бұрын
...and then all you see is hands.
@nettlarry9 ай бұрын
Imagine crouching behind a desk in the corner with that thing and hoping the security guy thinks it's a 3D printer
@zomgz9328 ай бұрын
A box with acoustic foam over top would likely quiet it down significantly. Only problem motor cooling.
@robert207708 ай бұрын
That's why you also need an alarm system for the room with the safe. Security in depth. That's what they do for classified document safes.
@johnf.kennedy31752 жыл бұрын
I don’t know how you manage to get so many people, myself included, to watch you pick locks almost every day. Not complaining, it’s truly fascinating to see your raw skill.
@sctjkc012 жыл бұрын
Funny you say this on one of the few videos where he doesn't actually show said skill. 🙃
@VectorxMan2 жыл бұрын
@@sctjkc01 because programming, assembling, and syncing the *home made* device doesn't require a skills.
@Hypagon2 жыл бұрын
I don't even remember how I got here
@abdallaismail21912 жыл бұрын
@@VectorxMan he did not even elaborate to make clear what is that he made to improve or whether he built the thing from scratch. If it was me I would have bragged about it for two hours
@asbestosgaming2 жыл бұрын
Answered your own question there
@ThatLazenbyGuy2 жыл бұрын
When he says people wanted to see the robot run for longer I thought "who would want to watch a robot run for 9 minutes?" I then proceeded to enjoy watching a robot run for 9 minutes.
@siccoblue21122 жыл бұрын
video skipping gang checking in
@trollenz2 жыл бұрын
It's mesmerising indeed... But I skipped AF 😂
@Skinflaps_Meatslapper2 жыл бұрын
I mean, a minute or two sure, just to get an idea of how it runs at normal speed, but it would be interesting to see how the mechanism is turning the dial in slow motion. I've always thought that it you mess up one number in a combo safe that you have to spin it and start over from the beginning, but apparently I need to do more research into that. It seems as if there's a shortcut to try multiple secondary and tertiary numbers without necessarily needing to start all the way over.
@sawyerblack46882 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately that noise does something unholy to my psyche.
@MadScientist2672 жыл бұрын
Dunno about 9 but it was useful in my mind to confirm it was doing what I thought it was (only working the last 2 numbers against each other)
@damustermann2 жыл бұрын
Imagine Payday 2 - 20 hours decoding and restarting the thing every 20 seconds....
@temptemp2172 жыл бұрын
overdrill x19
@suspiciouscheese45182 жыл бұрын
I was looking for Payday comments to make sure I wasn’t the only one.
@wisico6402 жыл бұрын
@@suspiciouscheese4518 payday was my first tought 😂
@shay45012 жыл бұрын
It doesn't decode it's actually a drill
@suspiciouscheese45182 жыл бұрын
@@shay4501 “Guys, the decoder, go get it”
@meateaw2 жыл бұрын
I reckon you could speed up the algorithm by skipping the "long distance" numbers, its much faster doing "close by" numbers, so if you prioritise testing those combinations first you get through a larger portion of your testing regime sooner.
@KallePihlajasaari2 жыл бұрын
The algorithm may do that normally, you would still have to test them later so it may not save that much if you have a bad choice of numbers.
@WmSrite-pi8ck2 жыл бұрын
That won't work because of how it is testing. As you see it is holding numbers one and two until it tests all of number three. It does this because if it wants to change numbers one or two it has to go all the way around the dial in reverse. Good thinking though.
@DinoQueenJoules2 жыл бұрын
I thought the same thing. Essentially keeping the total of the 3 lock combination numbers as low as possible for as long as possible. Letting the cracker go through more numbers at the beginning and slowing down as it goes through the combinations.
@garyoak41752 жыл бұрын
@@DinoQueenJoules I think the total time for all numbers is more important than "tweaking it to be better at first then slower after"
@FadeDance2 жыл бұрын
@@garyoak4175 It's an optimization problem. Both matter.
@Nicht_Dani2 жыл бұрын
LPL: This is a high qualiy lock. Also LPL: Unlocks it without being in the same room as the lock.
@DanielDaniel-xz2yp2 жыл бұрын
High quality lock knows it stands no chance against LPL, unlike low quality locks which fate is to be opened via a piece of can
@SebineLifeWind2 жыл бұрын
HIS POWER GROWS EXPONENTIALLY
@DisKorruptd2 жыл бұрын
that said, it did take 10 minutes when being opened from another room, clearly his power is diminished with distance
@Chuckbuckem2 жыл бұрын
Such a high quality that he had a robot do it
@airgliderz2 жыл бұрын
Safety feature incase its booby trapped!!
@G.A.N.2 жыл бұрын
Wideo nr [1337] deserved something as cool as this is!
@benoitb.36792 жыл бұрын
Nuclear wessel
@jaythatguyyouknow51352 жыл бұрын
I’m glad I’m not the only person who picked up on that
@johndoe17782 жыл бұрын
1337 as!!! Let's go
@JaredConnell2 жыл бұрын
LPL is leet
@brohanime2 жыл бұрын
it truly is a wery wirtuous wideo, with a wast amount of waluable information
@TedHubble2 жыл бұрын
For those wondering how it knows when it hits the right combination: After the last digit is correctly guessed, the dial will only turn back so far before it stops spinning. The robot monitors how much resistance there is and when it's suddenly prevented from spinning the dial, it knows it hit the right combination. If you go to 10:50 and watch in 0.25x speed you can see what's going on pretty clearly. As the middle gold disk turns clockwise, this is the robot entering the next digit (notice it spins a bit further each time), and at the end of each clockwise movement you'll see the outside ring with the gate in it move one more tick. It then goes counter-clockwise back to the previous position before trying the next digit. However when all digits have been entered correctly and the gates are all aligned, and the dial starts to turn counter-clockwise again, it allows the hook to fall into place (the loud click in the video) and stop the dial from turning back to the previous position. Since I'm this far, I'll include how the hook & rest of the physical lock works: If you look at the top right of the hook there's the white indent looking bit, that's a piece that's deeper than the rest of the hook that needs all 3 gates aligned so that the hook can move to the left and catch on the cut out bit of the gold ring (when the gates aren't aligned, that bit is just resting against the outside of the 3 rings). At that point, as you(/the robot) continues to spin the dial counter-clockwise it pulls the hook up, including the gold deadbolt looking piece that the hook is attached to. That deadbolt bit is what's physically blocking the silver cylinder at the bottom, which is connected to the bolts keeping the door closed. You can see at 10:56 when he retracts the bolts that the cylinder goes where the deadbolt originally was. This is why when you close a safe after you lock the bolts (normally turn the handle back to the closed position, if you're using the safe normally) you need to spin the dial to properly lock it. It pushes the hook out, which moves the deadbolt back down, and spins the gates so they aren't aligned anymore.
@christopherhoyt7195 Жыл бұрын
This ia a nice directive explanation 👍, thanks! I'm surprised how little clearance is involved in keeping the safe bolt blocked. The fact that this explanation only got 23 likes, 1 from me is very telling about the audience as a whole and a little sad. Hence LPL gets paid, they don't.
@gingeral253 Жыл бұрын
Big brain explanation?
@stevie-ray2020 Жыл бұрын
I own a small CMI fire-rated safe with this SG combination-lock fitted, but it won't open despite using what I'm certain is the correct combination as dial does seems to stop where it should when using those numbers. Can these mechanisms bind if left to gather a bit of dust & grime? Story is that I purchased safe in mid 1995 and was using in my jewellery manufacturing business before retiring due to ill-health. After sitting unlocked in my garage for about 5yrs, a friend shut & locked it before I could stop him as I wanted to check it, & now 5yrs on I'm still trying to open it as I'm in the process of moving and I would like to use it at my new residence.
@Dragon-Slay3r8 ай бұрын
R a vs S a f 😂
@murdo_mck5 ай бұрын
@@stevie-ray2020 Binding would be a pretty serious failure. If it was common there would be complaints online. Stating the obvious just in case: 1) the S&G knowledgebase articles e.g. stuck lever and misaligned wheel 2) the basics: mis-remembered combination order / turning the dial the wrong way / forgot you changed combination / etc. Good luck! You can always buy a robot, drill and repair it, learn lock manipulation or take it to a locksport convention as a challenge.
@Bahamuttone2 жыл бұрын
Hmm I would guess that a simple way in countering this attack is adding a disc with a centrifugal detent. On normal operation one does not spin the dial that fast.
@eristheslayer2 жыл бұрын
How annoying (and potentially dangerous) would it be if your safe locked you out because you were opening it too fast though
@Bahamuttone2 жыл бұрын
@@eristheslayer hm it’s not really locking you out. It’s just stopping the rotation momentarily, so it WOULD fool the automatic mechanism that detects the opening of the lock. And even if you make it avoid it you still make the dialer slow enough to be impractical
@annakelly98502 жыл бұрын
The digital versions the military use have those type of functions: It knows a human can only turn the hand so far, and it requires a variable speed of a human. otherwise it resets. (as far as I know, there is no known surreptitious way to enter these versions.)
@Jeff-ss6qt2 жыл бұрын
@@annakelly9850 Would it simply be possible to read a value from a random number generator for the speed, add ramp up and ramp down features, and simply limit it to the speed/range of a human? Jitter could possibly be be introduced randomly too.
@WmSrite-pi8ck2 жыл бұрын
@@Jeff-ss6qt Nope. If that dial spins fast enough it stops the whole process. So, you have to make the dial turn so slow that it'll take a long, long time. You can still use a robot, but the robot won't speed it up, just make it automated.
@ChessedGamon2 жыл бұрын
This looks like a device I'd see a movie and would complain about for being too plot convenient
@savethebees25742 жыл бұрын
Though, in a movie, this would take 30 mins *tops.*
@iamwhatitorture60722 жыл бұрын
you do have to run it for hours to days though, so it's not that convienient
@gregorygurvich71222 жыл бұрын
"Barely an inconvenience!" 😀
@johnm20732 жыл бұрын
@@gregorygurvich7122 Oh really?
@skimpyjim2 жыл бұрын
"007 the unedited 3 day cut"
@stapuft2 жыл бұрын
100% worthy of being episode 1337, as this this is VERY 1337.
@bigsteve67292 жыл бұрын
Cringe
@MasterMWL2 жыл бұрын
Came here to note that episode 1337 was indeed not wasted
@danielec2 жыл бұрын
This is absolutely intentional. Well played Mr lawyer.
@helpabrothawithasubisaiah53162 жыл бұрын
@@bigsteve6729 what are they saying? It seems some kind of nerd speak that I cannot fully translate
@hat13242 жыл бұрын
@@helpabrothawithasubisaiah5316 Urban dictionary exists for you
@CasualQuasar2 жыл бұрын
It was genuinely one of the coolest things I've seen in a long time, I have never seen the mechanism of a combination lock like that work internally and it's super interesting!
@seanduignan21272 жыл бұрын
10:30 is the moment you want; it cycles back through the previously found spots and then cycles through one more time to unlock 👍 great mechanism and computing
@markkealy44172 жыл бұрын
I don't think it works quieet like that, I think its literally just trying all the valid combinations
@PewPew4852 жыл бұрын
He's the only one that can make us watch a spinning robot arm for 11 minutes
@semibiotic2 жыл бұрын
Nah, thanks to fast forward.
@bikeny2 жыл бұрын
I started to watch and then got hypnotized and closed my eyes. I opened up (feeling refreshed, but remembering nothing about it), about 1 or 2 before he unlocked it.
@artemperesada34542 жыл бұрын
Yup
@hairybass4802 жыл бұрын
Now let's see that in super slow mo. Lol that machine is super impressive. 👌
@airgliderz2 жыл бұрын
It was relaxing.
@GATOtyger2 жыл бұрын
It's the first time that "looks like WE got this open" makes sense. Up until now, he was the only one opening the locks. Now they are two and BOTH are machines.
@seanj36672 жыл бұрын
He always means "the royal 'we'". kzbin.info/www/bejne/e2GcfYhsjbusrtU
@dakat51312 жыл бұрын
"This is getting out of hand- now there are two of them"
@MagdaGust622 жыл бұрын
@@seanj3667 I was expecting some rick rolling but thanks I guess
@nicholas67832 жыл бұрын
Soon, he will become one with the machine, and no lock will resist him. He will gain access to all. No lock will be safe.
@fredleonard15472 жыл бұрын
Fantastic mate. 50+ yrs ago I was a watch and clock repairer in Adelaide. Had a customer with an S&G lock on his floor safe. Fortunately the door was off when the lock stopped working. One of the springs had broken (rusty). It was many years old. I had a LOT of fun repairing it and and repairs to the number change system. Pity so many new safes gone electronic now.
@Dug882 жыл бұрын
Anyone else notice how lpl was just there ready for when the machine finished? Like no hesitation, right on queue and we got this open.
@onlineconsumer4796 Жыл бұрын
Because he knew the combo ahead of time and he could see it was about to open it. If you have the back of the lock open like he shows, you can get the combo in a minute by turning the dial and watching the wheels align.
@citylockapolytechnikeyllcc7936 Жыл бұрын
On one such tool, you can set the beginning combo and end combo range desired.
@ugo73952 жыл бұрын
Oh my god, truly an elite tool
@LocnavLivoc2 жыл бұрын
for such an elite youtuber
@JPTLN2 жыл бұрын
*eLEET
@killamjr2 жыл бұрын
I understood this reference
@happilicious2 жыл бұрын
FAQing elite!
@wickett70782 жыл бұрын
l33t
@myrmidon1112 жыл бұрын
I love that you picked 1337 for the super high-tech video.
@RyanFaeScotland2 жыл бұрын
#SpoilerAlert, jeez.... hehe :)
@ipick4fun272 жыл бұрын
What's the significance of 1337? I heard ppl keep talking about it on 1336.
@pvic69592 жыл бұрын
@@ipick4fun27 it looks like "leet". if you google "1337" or "leet' or better yet "1337 leet" youll find all the information you could ask for. theres even a wikipedia page that I didnt know about LOL
@DrakeOola2 жыл бұрын
@@ipick4fun27 It's supposed to be called "leet" speak like as in the word elite. if you remember back in middle school everybody would write "800813" because it "looks like boobies upside down". same concept with 'elite speak'. You basically just replace letters with numbers wh3r3 4ppl1c4ble lik3 th1s and say things like g3t 0wn3d k1d. It's super cringey even when it became a fad and it thankfully died down fast but you'll occasionally see 'skript kiddies' still talking like that because they think they're an 3l1t3 h4x0r when in reality they barely learned the basics of cheat engine. You can usually spot one from miles away because they'll undoubtable have the F4z3 C14n l0g0. God that physically hurt to type and press enter.
@lynh83782 жыл бұрын
Thank you...I really enjoy all of your videos and covert instruments!
@gaysalad41782 жыл бұрын
id love to just keep watching this robot work for like ten hours, the sound it makes is just so satisfying
@Bobal272 жыл бұрын
Video 1337, he’s showing off his 1337 hacking/cracking skills.
@codahighland2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I'm really wondering if that was intentional. I hope it was!
@L337Kelly2 жыл бұрын
And totally named after me! 😁 Lol, at least that's what I tell myself.
@MarkRose13372 жыл бұрын
Should have made the video 2:16 longer!
@biberbotzemann2 жыл бұрын
This is indeed, 1337 af. Thanks for keeping it real LPL!
@ericnelson45402 жыл бұрын
I'm glad I wasn't the only one who noticed that.
@ryanmalin2 жыл бұрын
Came here to say, there's no chance LPL used this as his 1337th video. He is way too clever to miss that.
@Dithermaster2 жыл бұрын
Came here to say that too, also glad I was not the only one who noticed.
@maliciousfry2 жыл бұрын
I was looking forward to seeing what would be featured in the 1337 video.
@jasonlin98052 жыл бұрын
Got a love more than 10 hours of a stepper motor working
@CableRage3o82 жыл бұрын
Any one else was more concerned about the butterfly screw spinning than the actual safe cracker?
@noor-rx1ij2 жыл бұрын
I was rooting for the little guy throughout the video
@prodestrian2 жыл бұрын
This video is just long enough that the final "click" at the end was super satisfying. Anyone who's ever successfully run a password brute force tool knows how good this feels, when it finally finishes! 😅
@TKing27242 жыл бұрын
I wish JTR had a satisfying click when it succeeds.
@justassimple83282 жыл бұрын
Not only in physical locks but also accounts and WiFi password cracking brute forcing is practically impossible especially the security that they implemented but changing the password like 12345678 and the computer says the password is been crack it's a satisfying moment
@jtestaccount24312 жыл бұрын
@@justassimple8328 not true at all cracking wpa2 handshakes is still very possible e.g servers with huge amounts of ram loaded up with rainbow tables
@Sonofavenger2 жыл бұрын
I kind of know this? Though in a completely different context. The Resident Evil 2 remake that was released back in 2019 has a couple of three wheel six letter combination locks, and I brute forced all of them. Not quite the same, but it still felt satisfying.
@craigrobbins24632 жыл бұрын
The final click made me jump. I was mesmerized.
@midimusicforever2 жыл бұрын
If LPL did it by hand, the video would be 2 minutes and 15 seconds long.
@DecisionsRQuestionable2 жыл бұрын
yeh
@imagination20032 жыл бұрын
With the introduction about 1 minute, 15 seconds to unlock the safe, another 15 seconds to show it's not a fluke, then the rest of the vid showing his comments about how good or bad the lock is.
@aether_creature53572 жыл бұрын
As cool as the safe cracker is, I would love to see a video with the saves themselves as the main feature. Either way I love your videos and the way you explain topics with genuine enthusiasm and interest. It shows in your work and is not lost 👌
@Zajarism2 жыл бұрын
The looseness of that combo wheel now cannot be understated. Lol Thank you for this amazing info. 👏
@godofsquirrels4942 жыл бұрын
3 day unlock LPL: Now once more to show it wasn’t a fluke.
@Donkusdelux2 жыл бұрын
Allot of bigger safes have quite a few more dials then one :p
@408mile4082 жыл бұрын
And I’d still watch that fucking video.
@RunescapeMeister-san2 жыл бұрын
This was the best several minutes of watching a wingnut slowly loosen I've experience in a while! Great video as always.
@citylockapolytechnikeyllcc79362 жыл бұрын
Crap, now I gotta go watch it for the wingnut ? Seen these operate enough back when I owned one. LOTSA of safes it will NOTY work upon, for reasons I will not enumerate.
@joseamirandavelez2 жыл бұрын
@@citylockapolytechnikeyllcc7936 Cam here to see if anybody noticed this... :P You can see it clearly if you move the fwd. But it's moving left, so either it is tightening or it is a left handed screw.
@JB-mw5rg2 жыл бұрын
The alignment was not 100%! Slight wobble.
@MSutherland2 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@Greg8872 Жыл бұрын
Closing my eyes, the sound gave me flashbacks to printing long banners on pin feed dot matrix printers from around 1990....
@stevestarcke11 ай бұрын
The machine is very simple and elegant. I expect that the software was as well. It was a great pleasure to watch it work.
@coc4152 жыл бұрын
I'm ready for the 10 hour version to help me go to sleep. This is joyfully mesmerizing!
@nrok1132 жыл бұрын
I recommend getting a cheap 3d printer. makes the same sound and you can make stuff with it
@piad21022 жыл бұрын
Old matrixprtinter. :)
@brianally15312 жыл бұрын
"Nothing on one, nothing on two ... nothing on seventy-seven, nothing on seventy-eight ..." Auto-dialers are legit tools for locksmiths but it's not recommended that they be used repeatedly on equipment that one cares about. The interior shot should make it plain that they can cause wear of several components.
@mindfortress1052 жыл бұрын
I can't imagine a situation you would need to use this on the same lock repeatedly. If you are stealing, you just need to use it once, if you forgot the code or just don't know it, you would also need to use it only once. If you have brain damage and are always using the machine to open your safe instead of using the code, then you might have a problem.
@robertboudrie22342 жыл бұрын
@@mindfortress105 A replacement Group II S&G lock is less than $100.
@brianally15312 жыл бұрын
@@mindfortress105 Yes, that's my point. It's a legitimate tool but it would be unwise to use it for fun. Doing so might be a sign of brain damage. Or thoughtless, anyway.
@adamf6632 жыл бұрын
if these robot beasties ever became a problem, lock makers could do what IT departments have been doing for 50 years -- too many failures in a row would cause a lockout for a few hours.
@jazzmusiccontinues11342 жыл бұрын
You’re describing a use case that is ridiculously rare. Don’t use that poor little lock for fun! If it’s their lock it can be used in whatever way they see fit to use it. And you’re calling others brain damaged. Or trolling
@the_flailing_melon34902 жыл бұрын
A spectacle of engineering and computer programming, fantastic video.
@skaramicke2 жыл бұрын
That wandering wing nut there had me on the edge of my seat
@ShawnWebb2 жыл бұрын
Does the machine need to worry about friction-induced heat? What about wear on the locking mechanism?
@hkssystemslocksafe24862 жыл бұрын
it's pretty hard on the locks I always suggest replacing the lock.
@rogerszmodis69132 жыл бұрын
If you’re using a robot to brute force a safe open do you really care about the well-being of the lock? If you cared you’d probably have the combination.
@brianflowers42172 жыл бұрын
@@rogerszmodis6913 If you didn't care about the well-being of the lock, you'd drill it.
@ShawnWebb2 жыл бұрын
@@rogerszmodis6913 my question is more of curiosity than of care.
@rogerszmodis69132 жыл бұрын
@@brianflowers4217 but that’s not nearly as cool
@Kage-Yami2 жыл бұрын
~ 3:00 that wing-nut slowly rotating itself loose on the right is kinda freaky.
@wilh3lmmusic2 жыл бұрын
You should read Feynman’s book. It has an entire chapter about his safecracking antics at Los Alamos
@NinjavomWolfstor2 жыл бұрын
I just love the ASMR Safecracking sounds :D
@redpatriot77682 жыл бұрын
How hot does the lock get during this procedure? I imagine it’s lots of wear and tear on the lock?
@GeneralKornwallis2 жыл бұрын
He replied to another comment and said that it gets filled with brass dust and locks that get dialed like this need to be replaced
@Mynamajef2 жыл бұрын
Dam
@G582 жыл бұрын
Leprechaun170 I wonder what happens if you spray GT58 or WD40 in the lock first?
@TheOldPioneer2 жыл бұрын
@@G58 unless you were continuously spraying it, something like wd40 is too light and would get wiped away pretty quick with only one coat. Basically, the lock would need some sort of oil bath to handle that kind of abuse without tearing itself apart.
@G582 жыл бұрын
TheOldPioneer Great points. Thank you. It would be interesting to see how much or how little and how frequently dosing would solve the problem, and how well an automated spray feed could be implemented. I find that GG58 leaves a water resistant coating which also lubricates. Maybe a top down delivery squirt every 60 seconds could sort it. The most valuable component in any engine is the oil. It’s also one of the cheapest, easiest to change, and most often neglected. My ‘02 diesel Mondeo has done 200,000 miles, and to be fair I don’t service it according to the manual. I haven’t touched the injectors. But the emissions are .52 where the max is 1.50! Regular oil changes using quality oil. 🧐😎
@shanieboi862 жыл бұрын
There is probably an algorithm it could use to calculate travel distance and do shortest travel distance numbers first. It could knock over a bunch of the solution space faster
@themythmaker12482 жыл бұрын
Not an engineer, but it seems to me that that would cause more heat wear-and-tear on the machine.
@jimstand2 жыл бұрын
Shane Yes, it would take a computer program to do it but YES, that would work. I don't think LPL mentioned this possible enhancement.
@JamesReedy2 жыл бұрын
There are also general rules about the relationships between the digits you’re recommended to not violate as those settings are apt to bind up the lock and such. From S&G’s manual they suggest the following which also would constrain the solution space a lot… 1. Do not select numbers which all end in “0” and “5.” An example of a poor combination is: “50 - 15 - 30.” An example of a good combination is: “52 - 15 - 37.” 2. Do not select numbers in an ascending or descending sequence. An example of a poor combination is: “22 - 41 - 68.” An example of a good combination is: “22 - 68 - 41.” 3. Leave at least a ten number margin between adjacent numbers of the combination. An example of a poor combination is: “41 - 39 - 66.” An example of a good combination is: “41 - 30 - 66.” 4. Do not use a number between 95 and 99 or between 0 and 20 for the third (or last) number of the combination. This can cause a condition which will inhibit the mechanism from locking correctly. 5. Avoid using easily guessed numbers (birth dates, house and phone numbers, etc.).
@TheRealColBosch2 жыл бұрын
@@JamesReedy Note that LPL said that certain combinations are omitted, which is why it has ~800,000 possible settings instead of 100*100*100 = 1,000,000.
@JamesReedy2 жыл бұрын
@@TheRealColBosch true, just wasn’t bothering the math to figure out how many of those rules of thumb were being included.
@nosferatu52 жыл бұрын
New addition to my ASMR playlist, thanks LPL.
@Serg3antD0nut2 жыл бұрын
This is actually the most wild thing I have ever seen. 11/10, about to watch this again.
@ThorOfficial2 жыл бұрын
Imagine him sitting there half an hour just to say "well looks that we got it open" not even a second after
@RickJohnson2 жыл бұрын
With a single malt in one hand and a cigar in the other. I'm sure it was brutal...
@Jmandude52 жыл бұрын
Completely ignoring the fact that he could have cut the video and you'd never know because nothing was moving on screen or making noise anymore.
@sherifsalah55632 жыл бұрын
Not that hard to predict when its gonna open looking from the inside, i knew almost exactly when its gonna open by predicting when all three notches will align.
@Atlas-Shrugs2 жыл бұрын
assumedly he already knows the combo and started the machine pretty close to that. Especially since the first number was 63 which would take 20 hours to get to. A cigar and drink is still probably in hand though
@borstenpinsel2 жыл бұрын
I guess since he knows the combination and has a tablet that shows the numbers being tried, he knows roughly how much time it takes to get to correct combo
@sebobafett16522 жыл бұрын
The wingnuts on the device were undoing themselves with all that vibration. Undoubtedly a very nifty machine though.
@JohnDoe-hw8ge2 жыл бұрын
the wingnuts could be easily replaced with locking nuts (with plastic inserts), but I also noticed it when forwarding the video
@turboturd79542 жыл бұрын
lol, the tolerances, must have been a cheap combo
@jordivermeulen25192 жыл бұрын
It was turning clockwise though, wouldn't that mean it's tightening itself? Maybe I'm missing something here.
@ryanfogarty76912 жыл бұрын
Vibration only causes his nuts to tighten. As is to be expected from LPL.
@JohnDoe-hw8ge2 жыл бұрын
@@jordivermeulen2519 It could still be english thread (counterclockwise to tighten) but without LPL clearing it up I couldn't say for sure
@kswis2 жыл бұрын
Blows my mind how fast that thing moves. I'm sure it'll go faster, wonder if it get hot. It was absolutely mesmorizing to watch. I enjoyed it thankyou LPL
@klausstock80202 жыл бұрын
Best chillout video ever.
@scott_maclean2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for showing the interior of the lock. I used one of these locks on a gun safe I made for my father, and he accidentally broke the dial off, rendering the lock unopenable. Now that I have seen the internal mechanism, I know how I can defeat it and open the safe.
@mgtproductions95242 жыл бұрын
Die Hard would have been 3 days long if Hans Gruber had used one of these
@nmcgunagle2 жыл бұрын
It already felt that long to begin with. I’m joking, great movie. One of my favorite Christmas movies actually.
@mgtproductions95242 жыл бұрын
@@sophierobinson2738 melon farmer
@ScottKenny19782 жыл бұрын
@@nmcgunagle it's not Christmas till Gruber falls off Nakatomi Tower!
@nmcgunagle2 жыл бұрын
@@ScottKenny1978 just like how it’s not Christmas til cousin Eddie kidnaps Clark’s boss.
@TheNefastor2 жыл бұрын
If I were making a safe, I'd add a mechanical countermeasure : the rotations wind up a spring that powers an escapement mechanism. If the spring gets fully wound-up, say after 500 rotations, the dial gets disconnected (clutch ?) and only gets reengaged to the lock after the escapement stops moving, which you could set to be 24 hours. This would limit severely your attempts per day, and then you can throw your robot in the trash :-D
@ng.tr.s.p.12542 жыл бұрын
To be fair, not many criminals can afford money for this thing and time to wait for it to solve the lock. Straight up destroying the safe would probably be faster :p
@aevangel12 жыл бұрын
@@ng.tr.s.p.1254 how much does LPL's little android powered robot cost?
@amojak2 жыл бұрын
it is basically software and a stepper motor driver/motor
@TheNefastor2 жыл бұрын
@@aevangel1 50 Euros. I had posted a breakdown but strangely the comment has been deleted. I hate KZbin so much I wish it would break forever.
@jimmyxxx20052 жыл бұрын
i think this can be done with a 15 dolar stepper, a 5 dollar stepper driver and a 10 dolar raspberry pi, plus the mechanical contraption.
@dala78622 жыл бұрын
thanks this is all i needed to see. i have 4 nema 23 and 3 nema 17 stepper motors for my diy cnc machines. looks like i got a new project to do soon.
@thedemonslayer512 жыл бұрын
Imagine a like 4 hour live stream of this.
@drevil27832 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@mrgw982 жыл бұрын
Some nice ASMR
@sankang94252 жыл бұрын
Would definitely watch it
@FrankSassi2 жыл бұрын
Video 1337! You did it!
@christosdeschaine9444 Жыл бұрын
Doc and Roger have decided to improve on this design. They're adding a couple electromagnetic clutches and using an S9G reactor to power the system. They expect to get number-to-number times in the millisecond range, so it wont take more than about 12 hours to run all the possible combos.
@willy480able Жыл бұрын
You beat me😂
@currentlypooping2 жыл бұрын
something about that is incredibly soothing!
@bobbycratchet39582 жыл бұрын
Let it be known that LockPickingLawyer will win ASMR video of the year award.🏆 The cadence of his voice along with the metronome quality of the safe cracking machine make for a perfect video. Thank you!
@Phymatic2 жыл бұрын
I was honestly so surprised at the sheer speed that this machine operates at. Rad little unit.
@Thermalions2 жыл бұрын
I imagine it would depend upon the safe being cracked. I've worked with a number of large bank safes in my time that it might struggle with at such speeds due to their poor lubrication and service history. The machine likely has a way to tweak the speed though.
@andersjjensen2 жыл бұрын
@@Thermalions These NEMA 23 units has a pretty decent amount of torque. They're often used for high end 3D printers. The good thing about the feed back system they're running is that you can set it to "talk back" mode. The program tells it to go to a certain position, and it flags the program when it reaches that position. So you pretty much don't need to account for resistance/slow movement in an application like this.
@LoftechUK2 жыл бұрын
This is so insane. Amazing safe cracking
@-TKMAX-2 жыл бұрын
Pure madness and i love it!
@b7r7a7d712 жыл бұрын
Reality: average opening time 20 hours Movies: 2 minutes
@K-o-R2 жыл бұрын
Unless you're Parker cracking the Bank of England vault, in a very respectable 2h25. Then he cracks their new high-tech vault in seconds with a hairpin 😁
@arcadeuk2 жыл бұрын
Masterlock: 2 seconds
@semibiotic2 жыл бұрын
That is the difference between bruteforce and skilled attacks.
@littlejackalo53262 жыл бұрын
Have you ever seen a movie where they tried every single combo until it opened? I haven't.
@KillarneyMark2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I was imagining Robert de Nero standing in a darkened office yelling “12 hours! Whaddya mean, it’s gonna take 12 hours?!”
@Janduin452 жыл бұрын
LPL, at my work we sometimes install security doors with, I'm fairly certain, S&G 8550MP locks. I recently noticed they had replaced the metal discs in the lock with white plastic ones. When using the robotic safe-cracker, have you noticed any heat build up in the discs? Seeing the change to plastic discs made me wonder if melting or softening the discs would/could be a viable attack. Maybe something as easy as some kind of rubber disc on an angle grinder would spin the wheel fast enough to melt/deform the discs inside the lock. I imagine S&G has put enough r&d into it so that they feel it isn't a problem, but the thought struck me that it might be an option.
@lazar21752 жыл бұрын
What do the discs actually do? Something as simple as butane jet lighter might be enough to melt the disc. Could it be that they are teflon discs? Teflon melts really high and is really slick, sometimes even used as a lubricant.
@someguy97782 жыл бұрын
Probably replaced for this very reason.
@nathanh29172 жыл бұрын
@@lazar2175 Probably Teflon as you said would make it harder to tell when you have a number correct.
@watcherwatchmen77852 жыл бұрын
Plastic disks were used to prevent x-ray viewing. (radiological attacks)
@csmjosh12 жыл бұрын
I love the inside view!
@matthewmiller60682 жыл бұрын
I want one. Not just the machine, but the safe door to go with it. This thing is so hypnotic to watch. Now I also need to find a video showing the "normal" opening of the lock from the inside to understand it.
@effychase622 жыл бұрын
Very suspenseful and quite satisfying. I'm exhausted! Good job LPL.
@Pyth1102 жыл бұрын
Gross
@DexterKDC2 жыл бұрын
Now he has a robotic safe cracker?! We're doomed!
@robertholtz2 жыл бұрын
This is his new and improved one! 😝🔓
@wileecoyote57492 жыл бұрын
You need a safe to be worried
@scarecrow2362 жыл бұрын
Just hide the safe lmao.
@scottneulist94952 жыл бұрын
Just wait until he builds a robot to pick locks for him. "bzz, click. on. one. bzzzzzzz, two. is. binding..."
@tinplategeek10582 жыл бұрын
Bloody robots coming here and taking all our jobs.
@lonnieramacher8963 Жыл бұрын
Can't imagine every locksmith not wanting one for their business.
@citylockapolytechnikeyllcc7936 Жыл бұрын
I had one, back in the day. A very archaic device. I would have to be able to secure the room the safe is in, independently of the business or homeowner. Not viable in most cases. Also, a lock malfunction makes this unusable. An Amsec S3/5/7 will NOT be doable with a dialer. A group 1 and other assorted mercantile safe locks will NOT be dialable. Most safes no longer are using these basic dials that once were the standard. I used my dialer maybe 4 times. Then I sold it to another locksmith. If the safe has this lock on it, likely the contents are not of high value. TL15+ USUALLY would have had a MP type lock. Today, I run into nearly all electronic locks... the good the bad and the fantastic. At best, they are far more reliable, easier to use without frustration, fast to open with combo, and no random number-pushing machines, as lock will not allow it.
@ibalrog2 жыл бұрын
Watching this robot work is more exciting than everything I'm supposed to be doing today.
@ryannorthup31482 жыл бұрын
Figures it would be a high-tech safe autodialer. It's the LEET episode!
@tslim2502 жыл бұрын
heh, i was searching the comments to see who else saw the link a few people did indeed!
@mrmonsterz6442 жыл бұрын
Love how this is video 1337 as this is truly an ELITE way of opening a safe
@fluffycritter2 жыл бұрын
This is almost as mesmerizing as watching a 3D printer to make sure that the print is coming out okay
@astralislux3052 жыл бұрын
I spoke with a safe expert. He said auto dialers are dangerous because the more you use a dial, the more risk you can destroy the mechanism, especially with old dials. He said to never use these with old dials, and probably not with new dials if you want to protect the gear. He said even a person trying an old dial a few times can destroy it.
@dylant47372 жыл бұрын
I’ve waited years to finally say leet
@Vynextus2 жыл бұрын
11 minutes of LPL brute forcing his way into our hearts
@lanep43225 ай бұрын
It's not only a dial safe opener but a doubles as a durability tester. Any safe that endures that and still functions normally would be an industry gold standard of quality.
@vmaldia2 жыл бұрын
That can be defeated or delayed if there is a thermal fuse type thing that locks up the mechanism after friction from high speed manipulation heats it up
@Veritas-invenitur2 жыл бұрын
Definitely. Their are a lot of ways that I can see a lock being designed to defeat this attack. Thermal expansion from friction for one.
@mickys80652 жыл бұрын
If the metal gets that hot sure. But metal on metal doesn't make nearly as much heat as your thinking. Then you have the fact a mildly warm day may be enough to equal the heat from this type of attack. You've made it harder to break in, but you've also made the safe completely unsellable to any place that has heat problems
@vmaldia2 жыл бұрын
@@mickys8065 good point. Perhaps something like a steam engine's mechanical governor that via centrifugal force locks up if spun too fast
@thenaimis2 жыл бұрын
Newer S&G digital spin locks defeat this attack in a couple of ways. When you start turning the dial in a direction, it picks the starting position at random. Also, consistent spinning of the dial, i.e. not the "pulsed" spinning you get by hand will be rejected.
@ejm573012 жыл бұрын
The newer S&G mechanicals make you push in at 0(zero) and then continue to open also... 1/2 price of the Electronic locks.... and minimal failure rate compared to the Electronics also.
@BrianB144712 жыл бұрын
They use the electronic locks on newer SCIF containers (cabinets and room doors). Easier for security to update codes on a regular basis without having a locksmith come in and change 50 container codes.
@neilkurzman49072 жыл бұрын
It would be easy to make a non-consistent spin in software.
@littlejackalo53262 жыл бұрын
@@ejm57301 electronic locks are far better in almost every conceivable way, that's why high security ones can be expensive. Combo locks are good for a safe you'll be entering once a week or less. Anything you have to enter a couple times a week or more, there's no better method than electronic.
@JamesReedy2 жыл бұрын
@@littlejackalo5326 true, but as an EE I know from experience all electronics fail eventually. Not that mechanical locks can’t too but I have more faith in them than a digital lock. Also push buttons can wear leaving a pattern that constrains the number of guesses one would have to make. That said I realize too many wrong guesses results in a delay on most locks…
@AfroMyrdal2 жыл бұрын
Man ngl, I've struggled with sleep deprivation for years, struggling to fall asleep, but I fell asleep listening to the sound of that machine doing its work. It was oddly enough very soothing and stress-reliefing, my breath synced somehow with the tact. 10/10 would recommend! Very interesting to see how it's working. I would however like to see more of the inner workings of a safe lock, would that be possible? Or is it stupid-simple like, I'm looking at it right now?
@David-bb2ed2 жыл бұрын
Should be split screen showing both the front and back simultaneously. Easy video to make after having set everything up once and people would love it. It's great to watch the back tumbler (or whatever it's called) turning ever so slowly.
@bytesizedengineering2 жыл бұрын
Sorry if this was already answered but I didn't see it. Why does the latch fall into the detents once the right combination is tried? Is that just on high end locks? It seems like the every day safe you have to try the lever after each attempt. How did you avoid this?
@NathanaelNewton2 жыл бұрын
That stepper motor is intense.. the power supply and control circuit for it would be interesting to see 😮
@NathansWargames2 жыл бұрын
Fitting that the 1337 video is this :)
@Brianz992 жыл бұрын
I had a feeling "1337" was 'gonna be a doozy. :D
@DerekAlfonso2 жыл бұрын
I had a feeling it'd be eL33T, thanks @LockpickingLawyer for delivering
@hayleyxyz2 жыл бұрын
Beat me to it lol. Very fitting
@brunoais2 жыл бұрын
Idem
@pacotacos12342 жыл бұрын
I highly recommend playing with the video playback speeds while the machine is running, very cool seeing it slowed down
@DrTune2 жыл бұрын
Just discovered this channel and, damn, guy knows how to make good content..
@PPNStudio2 жыл бұрын
[1337] new world (LPL's world) record length video! Over 11 mins!! As always, the LPL doesn't disappoint unlike many products showcased on his channel.
@sankang94252 жыл бұрын
[464] is the longest. [580] is quite long too.
@jamesick2 жыл бұрын
why are people acting like it's such a big thing that his video is over 11 mins long lmao. yes, the product here is different than him picking a lock, the video length will be different.
@harperthegoblin2 жыл бұрын
"This is the Lockpicking Lawyer, and today we will be breaking into one of the most secure buildings in America, The White House"
@janhelgetollefsen30482 жыл бұрын
"Now, normally this security guard would pose quite the problem, but due to an oversight they do not wear any gas mask or other gas attack protection if there is no high security alert. So I'm simply going to toss in a canister of the high grade sleep gas, if you want a canister on your own I sell these on my website."
@Eoraph2 жыл бұрын
You mean LPLs house right?
@humanmold2 жыл бұрын
I'd go to fort knox,screw the Whitehouse.
@dukhntr212 жыл бұрын
Nothing on one, click out of two, one second while I disarm this guard, nothing on three…
@nickboland47202 жыл бұрын
Lol securtiy guard isnt a problem thanks the the pick bill and I made in the shape of a boot that kicks the guard in the tumblers
@Mukis.2 жыл бұрын
imagine if the payday gang had their hands on this "Guys, the cracker, go get it." _jewelry store would be so much easier_
@PaiSAMSEN2 жыл бұрын
At least it wouldn't break as often as the damn drill.
@nerfinator4652 жыл бұрын
Do you really want to play jewelry store for 20 hours though?
@Mukis.2 жыл бұрын
@@nerfinator465 good point, yes
@temptemp2172 жыл бұрын
@@nerfinator465 The hot dog stand better be ready for 20 hours of harassment 😳
@paulsd92552 жыл бұрын
Given how slow this is, thermite, plasma cutter, or two drills and nitrogen is just faster.
@Snommelp2 жыл бұрын
Until I saw this video, it just never occurred to me that you could check a combination in such a way as to preserve the first two digits while running through all the possible iterations of the third digit.
@beatadalhagen2 жыл бұрын
I'd love seeing slow-mo of the inside over several cycles.
@Hauketal2 жыл бұрын
If you want to understand it, here is a working wooden model explained: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYubiIV6i8x-qM0
@Dankey_King2 жыл бұрын
put playback speed on 0.25?
@beatadalhagen2 жыл бұрын
@@Dankey_King More like 0.0025 I'd think.
@dustintunis93472 жыл бұрын
@@Dankey_King - It's still a blur, it would need recorded with a high fps camera.
@johneppstv Жыл бұрын
When he talking bout dialing 1.5 numbers at a time... that is why i like this content.
@christophersnyder32412 жыл бұрын
the best video ever. simply mesmerizing and random
@Matt-dc8lp2 жыл бұрын
Would love to see more vids about the internals of these types of locks. I dont quite get how going back and forth like it does solves the combo. Many of these types of locks I've seen require you to go a multiple rotations past a number.
@FurnishedIgloo2 жыл бұрын
It’s trying the last number not all 3 all the time
@frollard2 жыл бұрын
Note how it does a full sweep of the last number, then increments the 2nd to last number, and sweeps the last again...it's checking all possibilities just not redialing the first 1:2 numbers for checking all of the 3rd.
@robertboudrie22342 жыл бұрын
Back and forth is a trick to exhaustively try the third number after the first two numbers have been dialed. This is due to the mechanical nature of the lock and the only way to defeat it is to get a lock with a 4 wheel pack.