I enjoyed the video nevertheless I think there's room for improvement. I wish you were more consistent when comparing the aircraft. If you're going to give speed on one, you should give speed on all. Likewise, range, climb rate etc.
@grafhilgenhurst97172 жыл бұрын
And cost!
@AQUAMAGNET Жыл бұрын
@@grafhilgenhurst9717 and Fuel burn rate!
@amamdawhatever2 жыл бұрын
The E1000 is hands down the most fun I have ever had flying! No joke 3,000 FPM climb! My only quam is the thing is so slick and the Vle being pretty low, I feel like speed brakes would be a welcome addition.
@dudieland Жыл бұрын
My favorite is the Piaggio 😊
@jjones66062 жыл бұрын
Epics and TBMs are both too cool. Even PC-12s are rad. My instructor flew a Blackhawk King Air 200 and I got a few rides. Also an awesome ship.
@climjames2 жыл бұрын
I like the PC12 NGX
@Evancho082 жыл бұрын
Missed out on the Piper Cheyenne 400LS
@paulmess2722 Жыл бұрын
the best in design and speed by far the EPIC!!!
@scottdecarlo815 Жыл бұрын
Which ones have a rest room? There is no way a wife and kids are going to fly for hours without having to whiz.
@donovandasilva3930 Жыл бұрын
None
@Perich2910 ай бұрын
Just stop at the airport to use restrooms.
@simonrobert98589 ай бұрын
Pilatus PC12 had
@emiconstantino54347 ай бұрын
Avanti piaggio
@jrs91442 жыл бұрын
Nice try but you have numerous mistakes, especially on the Lancair
@sleektruck222 жыл бұрын
Agreed, Lancair Evo is Turbine Powered.
@cebunting2 жыл бұрын
Kingair 90 isn’t sold anymore either
@andrewallason4530 Жыл бұрын
Multiple segments with serious discrepancies between what is said and the text on screen. Some airspeeds given as knots, some as miles per hour. Some ranges given as Nautical miles with others as miles or even kilometres. And includes aircraft out of production for 45+ years!
@areza151432 жыл бұрын
30,000 feets, that’s awesome! But seriously folks, lose the game show prize announcer please! Instead, use an announcer who knows aviation.
@Nbolanos06242 жыл бұрын
The tbm 940 isn’t the newest the 960 is
@pmoohkt2 жыл бұрын
at 2:37... it's said that the Beechcraft can "even fly from Paris to Moscow"... That's not going to happen nowadays 😄
@satguy2 жыл бұрын
Don't forget about annual maintenance costs you just can't run down to your corner A&P and have them work on this.
@alonzovillarreal46662 жыл бұрын
All of them are wonderful airplanes in their own right.
@kevinbarry712 жыл бұрын
C208 High performance? That aircraft is many things, but high-performance is not one of them
@climjames2 жыл бұрын
LOL. I always thought of it as a short range mini cargo plane.
@Trevor_Austin2 жыл бұрын
The C208 has a really good performance. It works well on short fields, lifts a good load, is fuel efficient, is easy to maintain etc. Performance is about achieving your goals with minimum input.
@gman830902 жыл бұрын
The Royal flying Dr service in Australia actually use the king air
@merc340sr2 жыл бұрын
I like the Super King Air 350 (T-tail).
@mikeh72562 жыл бұрын
This video was obviously setup for clicks/views and was quickly put together with outdated information. If you use this video as a guide for pricing, you'll need to whip out over $1m more in some examples vs the prices shown here. I've flown a few of these examples and comparisons are definitely needed - from real experience, not captured sales brochures.
@haljohnson694711 ай бұрын
its good enough. nobody is going to make a sales decision based on this video's prices.
@sj8016 Жыл бұрын
Numbers and spelling leaves some room for improvement as does consistency with comparisons and stick to one unit of measure not hopping all over
@matthewbrinker66152 жыл бұрын
Didn’t Beechcraft stop making the ka90?
@sleektruck222 жыл бұрын
Sure Did! Years Ago!
@lurking0death2 жыл бұрын
The Caravan EX has a much larger engine than stated here.
@bluegrasskid48352 жыл бұрын
The Cessna Conquest II's max flight distance is 1700Nm 13:27 but it's maximum range is 2500 miles (approx 2150 Nm). What is the difference between max flight distance and range?
@killingfields14242 жыл бұрын
Avanti Evo
@easternwoods43782 жыл бұрын
Beechcraft has discontinued the C90
@Perich2910 ай бұрын
60 gallon per hour your looking at 5 miles per gallon in the air.
@keithgardner4796 Жыл бұрын
Ummm... the Evo has a range of 1759 nm, and it can fly nonstop from New York to California? Does it create a tesseract or something? That distance is about 2150 nautical miles. There is simply no way that the Avanti EVO can fly from New York to California non-stop. Sorry guys.
@haljohnson694711 ай бұрын
the tesseract feature is only $80,000.
@flutebasket4294 Жыл бұрын
My God, the errors in this video are almost astonishing!
@KSRRider2 жыл бұрын
Conquest II is a beast. The cruise speed is incorrect. The video says 300 mph. I routinely seen 310-315 KNOTS TAS in cruise flight in the high 20s. That is ~360 mph. Much faster than a King Air 200
@billmorris26132 жыл бұрын
Good morning to all from SE Louisiana 15 Sep 22.
@hugopnabais7 ай бұрын
ok it was going relative well until you got to the Kodiak 🤦♀ So the Kodiak is comparable to a JET?!!! 🤣
@dontdeletehistory2 жыл бұрын
Love your videos
@donizetesilva1088 Жыл бұрын
Donizete Braganca pt SP Brasil ✈✈✈✈✈✈
@danstacy37875 ай бұрын
you need to be more realistic on the range. it is 2440 air miles from ny to la this plane has a 2000 mile range with no reserve
@Warcrazyness Жыл бұрын
The politis pc-12 is the best
@jun-nv2hf Жыл бұрын
Good 👍 👍 👍
@therusticcollectionebaysto70282 жыл бұрын
New sub ! Liked 🙏😃😘
@OskieOmega2 жыл бұрын
I worry about a bathroom
@freedomforever67182 жыл бұрын
FYI, an aircraft with floats is a floatplane not a "seaplane".
@blublade562 жыл бұрын
You are talking millions of bucks like every dog and cat got that . Only problem is I'm no dog or cat just a 45 year pilot that cant afford an R/C anything . I would make my own but where I am nobody even knows what Balsa wood is .
@2:25, 15,000 miles range? That flight distance is more than a 747SP. Unless your narrator is a robot, you have no basic understanding of aviation. In short you should not produce videos beyond your intelligence.
@diegoalejandrolopezgarcia16292 жыл бұрын
He said 1,500 @ 2:03
@l.carlossimental609611 ай бұрын
Expensive!
@thatfeeble-mindedboy2 жыл бұрын
Still waiting for a Caravan sized (or even larger) - Skymaster-style, twin boom tailed, dual turboprop, centerline thrust, utility craft with an option for amphibious floats. (Imagine what a bush plane that would make) …Such a craft could be certified for twin-engine operation during takeoff and for over-water passenger hauling, or single engine economy cruise or for increased range requirements, all without any asymmetric thrust concerns inherent in non-centerline-thrust designs. I would like to see innovations explored like: what is the upper limit of tire size in an amphibious float? And also the concept of an upward-hinging rear engine that completely opened the full dimensions of the fuselage and used a telescoping gantry-style crane that would extend outward from the rear cargo opening so that oversized items or palletized cargo could be quickly picked up and brought inside without the use of forklifts etc. or being broken down from a palletized state. Such could also be used as handicap access or in air-ambulance service, whether loading a single gurney, or a self- powered, pre-provisioned, prefabricated, custom-fit emergency medical “module” outfitted with any specialized equipment needed. If such a module could be carried on an an ambulance chassis, the patient and an attendant could possibly be transported from scene to ER, or from hospital to hospital without any intervening movement or exposure, even maintaining full quarantine protocol from end-to-end, if equipped with self-contained water and air supply or filtration, waste management, and climate control.