combining three great things: toycat, geography and cutting people in half
@Name-iq8te4 жыл бұрын
Like the homeless!
@sebastianhracek5894 жыл бұрын
Wait a minute
@JaMorantBiggerArm4 жыл бұрын
@@Name-iq8te *hol up*
@TheRealKingLeopoldII4 жыл бұрын
I prefer just cutting off the hands of people
@kousvetkousvet41584 жыл бұрын
@@TheRealKingLeopoldII oh.
@cn70324 жыл бұрын
Ummm toycat you went a bit too far with the halving, everything below you arms had disappeared. We get your meant to take risks in life, but cutting yourself in half is not one of them.
@w00dhat4 жыл бұрын
*you're
@RumblyChair44074 жыл бұрын
Wood Hat *your
@CaptainBalcon4 жыл бұрын
Nahh, that's just the webcam that doesn't frame all of his body. He just cut his legs off, the rest is still there
@blufferfish08964 жыл бұрын
Alex Coyle *you’re
@aoaoaaoaoao8894 жыл бұрын
Alex Coyle ur*
@retrowave693 жыл бұрын
"The UK never invaded china" There's a few opium wars that would like to beg your pardon.
@gadierv98213 жыл бұрын
@@Thejas_Gatty yes they were talking about invasion
@panner113 жыл бұрын
But he said invaded and not conquer lol
@thisguy9763 жыл бұрын
@@panner11 "like the UK never invaded China but we did steal of of their ports".?????????
@CrilderOfficial3 жыл бұрын
The east india company did because they wanted to sell opium to china causing a war so yes they did.
@chloemakesvideos38892 жыл бұрын
I think people forgot Hong Kong exists and was colonised...
@mariebrown49664 жыл бұрын
My favorite maps are still, "countries in Africa to which I'd like Togo," and, "countries in Africa I have Benin."
@rogink4 жыл бұрын
Mine's "when you Ghana go?"
@Enafa6664 жыл бұрын
I Beninese and live in Benin lol
@---bm5bc3 жыл бұрын
LOL and there neighbors
@fabianniestegge41053 жыл бұрын
Countries im not Ghana go to.
@malidevGames3 жыл бұрын
@internet person don't have flight service ?
@jc_bgnls4 жыл бұрын
"countries that are landlocked rely on their neighbours, if their neighbours agreed they dont exist, they wouldn't"- laughs in swiss🇨🇭
@tomr72354 жыл бұрын
Alao, Switzerland is unitary according to the map. Obviously rubbish!
@svenbonne4 жыл бұрын
Germany is in!
@banana_man_1014 жыл бұрын
swissch
@shyasaturtle4 жыл бұрын
Schweizer?
@maxkho004 жыл бұрын
@@tomr7235 Yeah, if Russia is federal then Switzerland is certainly federal as well.
@Xaiff3 жыл бұрын
"Favourite British colony of Indonesia..." That was technically correct at certain point in history, but an overwhelming amount of time it was a Dutch colony. It's surprising to see Indonesia didn't follow Dutch driving custom
@dylanmurphy93892 жыл бұрын
its 100 percent correct so nothing to add, as if he doesn't know it was ruled by the Dutch smh
@TheAnonymousKnightOfJustice7 ай бұрын
Indonesia actually purposely NOT follow dutch nor learn dutch to cut ties with their old and slaved history
@vlogdemon4 жыл бұрын
“We didn’t invade China”. Toycat we sailed military ships up their rivers and canals, what do you mean we didn’t invade?
@ibx2cat4 жыл бұрын
I'll send my military ships up your canal
@outsidehistorian74364 жыл бұрын
@@ibx2cat English Civil War, 1648, colorized
@treasurefamting4 жыл бұрын
ibx2cat that's what he said
@westiebus15594 жыл бұрын
Lol
@dezbiggs63634 жыл бұрын
Exactly. They occupied amd sacked Beijing at one point.
@jakehoganOW4 жыл бұрын
"not Thailand" literally insulting their king or any of his family members gives you five years in prison, even if you did it while not in Thailand. Also, Thailand's definition of insult is very very loose. I would feel like I'm in danger there...
@maxwellli70574 жыл бұрын
I'm not gonna comment anything, god save the king.
@Picklericksin4 жыл бұрын
Yh they are a strict monarchy
@ajayavsm74764 жыл бұрын
Lemme check if I get into prison Thailand's king sucks!
@ajayavsm74764 жыл бұрын
yeah bro it worked the police are already at my door
@UnQuacker4 жыл бұрын
@@ajayavsm7476 F
@rodrigomarolv4 жыл бұрын
I'd say this video is pretty Western-biased. Gotta keep that in mind when watching geography content coming from Western creators in general.
@devrajsood55254 жыл бұрын
Absolutely
@Komnenos834 жыл бұрын
How is it? and dont you have to do the same with non western creators, be curious?
@BigMacc3 жыл бұрын
Creators in general
@lore98283 жыл бұрын
Not western, just Anglo
@marco.trevisan3 жыл бұрын
@@lore9828 That's what I was thinking. Not western, anglo. Gabon isn't in the Commonwealth, so it gets confused with Equatorial Guinea (which isn't in the Commonwealth either).
@miitokii4 жыл бұрын
I love how the 2050 NATO map includes every country, even North Korea, except for Russia
@fireeeeyisgone3 жыл бұрын
BAD RUSSIA. BAD. (jk)
@pelinalwhitestrake33673 жыл бұрын
Also Singapore and Christmas Island.
@helpmereach1ksubscribersbe6053 жыл бұрын
Nato will destroy by China in WW3 😈
@ilebillybobjoe3 жыл бұрын
@@helpmereach1ksubscribersbe605 no shit, their entire nation is made in China.
@f96583 жыл бұрын
Nato is literally formed just to unite against the Soviet Union. Now that Soviet Union is gone and the Russian military doctrine has moved towards being specialized in defence, NATO is just a useless alliance made by America to extend their geopolitical power in Europe.
@tomofthetomb4 жыл бұрын
Your face was covering NZ the whole time 😢
@appleslover4 жыл бұрын
Wait.. there's such a thing?
@kyedamant13234 жыл бұрын
New zealand doesn't exist as an Australian looking at the pacific ocean I have never seen new zealand only water
@anawesomepet4 жыл бұрын
13:32
@annahimmel4 жыл бұрын
Who needs NZ anyways
@infinitejinpachi4 жыл бұрын
Not like we were going to be an important part of any of the maps anyway so who cares
@TWMASTER2003 жыл бұрын
I do just want to point out that during the "developed vs undeveloped" countries map you say that Korea, Japan, Taiwan and Singapore were given "exceptions" but all these countries are simply very highly developed and rich countries. The standard of living in Japan or Taiwan is no different to Europe and North America. They are fully developed countries with advanced economies and militaries and everything else you would expect of a developed country.
@someweeb36503 жыл бұрын
I'd argue that all of those are above North America and most places in Europe. Once you get to Malaysia then you can argue that it's worse than Europe.
@BlockWorks3 жыл бұрын
Of course it had to be the anime fan
@planefan0823 жыл бұрын
@@BlockWorks I absolutely hate anime but fully agree. I grew up in HK, travelled around to all mentioned countries a lot. They had a higher standard of living ten years ago than N.A. does now lol. Moved to N.A. around 7 years ago to be near more family. This place is alright but it's really depressing and sad tbh
@rjlee-cc4xy3 жыл бұрын
@@BlockWorks it’s true though? i mean look at their gdp per capita, standards of living and education levels compared to european countries
@Hiroheim3 жыл бұрын
@@BlockWorks what
@renderproductions10324 жыл бұрын
So there is a country in the world that only mines diamonds and not Iron, gold, lapis, coal, or Redstone? Woah.
@IndustrialParrot28164 жыл бұрын
speaking of mining plenty of countrys have long historys with mining: USA, Poland, Australia, and china
@c0oldug2734 жыл бұрын
What about emeralds
@renderproductions10324 жыл бұрын
@C0OLDUG27 Are they in an extreme hills? Also getting emeralds from villagers is much easier.
@mahraba8744 жыл бұрын
J Smith the alps have lots of emeralds
@renderproductions10324 жыл бұрын
@Beardless Matt: Farming villagers is much more effective.
@firmaneffendi28014 жыл бұрын
3:21 as Indonesian, I can explain why we drive in the left hand traffic. We used to be a Dutch Colonies but prior to British Occupation (Yes, Brits once occupied Indonesia, see about Willem Daendels and Sir Raffles and its origin name of Rafflesia flower) we never taught to drove on which lane and every horseman drove without any specific lane rules (actually many motorcyclist in Indonesia today do the same unethic opposing lane driving). When the Brits came, they spilled their tea and tears their eyes after shocked to see how traffic jammed accumulated (even Jakarta had the worst traffic in Asean today lol) due to no lane policy, so they taught us to drive as they do in Britain. We started to drive in the left like a wise Englishman until Dutch comeback to Indonesia to reestablished their Dutch East Indies Colonies (by this time, Brits had been pushed into Malayan peninsula today Malaysia and Singapore). The Dutchy were thankfull to the Brits policy so they didn't need to waste their time in East Indies traffic and could had a dinner on time with their family.
@Ha_haqiqie73 жыл бұрын
Waw... Nggak ada yang komen? :)
@pashauzan2 жыл бұрын
Wait, I thought it was due to the French invasion of the Netherlands changed the road system, except for the Dutch East Indies
@freez.mp42 жыл бұрын
i don’t care sorry mate
@dylanmurphy93892 жыл бұрын
As an Englishman, i got mad when you said people on bikes often drive in the wrong lane lol I think we hate a lack of order
@Cappy-Bara4 жыл бұрын
5:00 when it comes to why Britain drives on the left and everywhere else is on the right, well back in the day, the left side was the determined side because of some psychology of most people being right handed. Well when Napoleon rose to power and be wanted to ride alongside troops, he would be on the right side where they were all holding out their spears, swords, bayonets, etc and he changed the rules so everyone switched sides so he could have a little more distance as he rode by, and since France was occupying most of mainland Europe, it stuck. Well when cars were invented and they had to set in stone which side to drive on they went with the mainland Europe way, while Britain kept on doing it their original way. Note: America was a casual ally with Napoleonic France and still hated Britian for the revolution and war of 1812 so they sided with France just to spite Britain.
@vihaandoesthings62904 жыл бұрын
Andrew: Calls Jamaica a British Territory. Jamaicans: *Triggered*
@gerrardjones284 жыл бұрын
Also calls japan a british colony!
@JH-jk3nm4 жыл бұрын
Gerrard Jones he was being sarcastic
@Colin_Yote4 жыл бұрын
Nah *north America is a British territory*
@gerrardjones284 жыл бұрын
@@JH-jk3nm I couldnt tell.
@vihaandoesthings62904 жыл бұрын
Btw I'm not Jamaican, I'm just a Map Nerd.
@rann8084 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: In British Overseas Territories in North America, they drive on the left side of the road, but have Right-side style cars, as these are easiest to import from America
@micayahritchie71584 жыл бұрын
Really? I'm from Jamaica and we do not have right hand style cars. So it would be interesting to me if the overseas territories do, because I presume getting cars here would be as difficult as getting them to the virgin islands etc
@TheLocalLt4 жыл бұрын
The American Virgin Islands drive on the left with right-side cars as well. As for the rest of America’s Caribbean possessions, Puerto Rico and yes, Guantanamo, both drive on the right. Navassa Island has no roads and its weather station hasn’t been used since the 90s. The American Panama Canal, ceded in 1977, formerly drove on the right as well.
@alex_gaimar4 жыл бұрын
Also, the Russian Far East drives on the right side but has steering wheels mostly on the right because of Japanese cars.
@natenae86354 жыл бұрын
Micayah Ritchie In The Bahamas we have right hand side cars but drive on the left it’s a wierd mix in my earlier years i didn’t know cars had a specific steering side for the road laws I just thought it was random or preference
@exploringthedepths743 жыл бұрын
14:07 if you ignore how west africa and China had the largest and richest economies in the world for several centuries before the 1600s. And conveniently, the nation's around colonizers are also wealthy, very odd
@kylelipp31704 жыл бұрын
Britain started driving on the left so they could swing swords at their enemies when they pass by
@graveperil21694 жыл бұрын
thats what the world did its Napoleon that changed it as he was left handed then the US changed to show how independent they were
@blufferfish08964 жыл бұрын
Grave Peril the US just changed everything to be petty and be all “we are special and independent” they just up and changed the language so they could be special, very frustrating lol.
@thiagooliveira79354 жыл бұрын
Left was the original way... napoleon caused everywhere he dominated to change (but he didnt dominate Britain), and afterwards those nations passed their traditions to their colonies
@skelet83374 жыл бұрын
@@thiagooliveira7935 do you think that napoleon dominate every country except Britain
@johnnyjoestar51934 жыл бұрын
@@skelet8337 he did
@andyp20044 жыл бұрын
for the unitary and federal states map, the purple means "PIRATES AHOY"
@dukeradwardthe5th8434 жыл бұрын
the purple means no state
@magentamappinganimation95324 жыл бұрын
Duke Radward the 5th Pirates don’t make states anyway but i guess you’re right
@forestcity42174 жыл бұрын
Magenta Mapping/Animation, ever heard about the pirate republic?
@johnpears95584 жыл бұрын
@Magenta Mapping/Animation what about the Nassau’s republic and Somalia
@riceman51744 жыл бұрын
noooooooo, you cant just steal the world's cargo and stuff haha somalian pirates go brr
@newwaveinfantry8362 Жыл бұрын
18:22 - Nope, that would be a violation of innerstate commerce.
@Billy-xm6km4 жыл бұрын
“Ok what should the teams be?” US: EVERYONE AGAINST RUSSIA!
@sammybeaver91304 жыл бұрын
The only thing the US hates more than a healthy diet, Russia
@milkshake8344 жыл бұрын
Sammybeaver 88 lol
@milkshake8344 жыл бұрын
Billy lol
@williewilliamson48824 жыл бұрын
+China
@wilyriley_4 жыл бұрын
The majority of Europe: Everyone against the US!
@fercojurado99484 жыл бұрын
This guy just spits all the unfounded claims with 0 arguments going for them, the most fascinating is the one that Thailand is a good place, literally a military dictatorship
@krause67183 жыл бұрын
he's just ignorant
@deyversonlaconchadetumadre3 жыл бұрын
@@krause6718 he's just britti-wait why am I hearing the brittish national anthem outside my house
@krause67183 жыл бұрын
@@deyversonlaconchadetumadre nos encontramos otra vez..
@eduardof73223 жыл бұрын
I mean Thailand is a nice place, but claiming that Thailand is the ONLY country in red where he doesn´t think he would be in danger the whole time and that´s why it should be considered a developed nation is straight up ignorant. Countries like Chile, Costa Rica, Seychelles or Uruguay are far more developed, democratic, and safer than Thailand (And even safer than most big cities in the UK). And many others like the UAE, China, Botswana, Turkey and Argentina may face some major challenges as they still on their way to reach full development, but they all still far safer than Thailand. Plus, it is not like safety is the only criteria to define when a country is developed or not. I think this guy really has a very black and white vision of the world.
@yasmingomes48603 жыл бұрын
he really has a colonizer mentallity, I'm glad I'm not the only one that noticed it
@jonathanrouse362 жыл бұрын
I love geography so much and I love every single topic that you cover. You also pack in A LOT of information within the time frame of your videos. You are the absolute polar opposite of the old school "lecturer" who drones at a snails pace and puts everyone to sleep. (what do you have for breakfast?) Thanks for sharing!
@TheGadgetPanda4 жыл бұрын
I was surprised by how many of those maps excluded South Africa.
@straytonox14924 жыл бұрын
the problem with South Africa is that there is Africa in the name
@kornaes4 жыл бұрын
@@mypenisisunbelievablysmall5258 racism against the English 'settlers', I wonder why. 🤔🤔
@virginiansupremacy4 жыл бұрын
@@mypenisisunbelievablysmall5258 before 1994 it was the other way around
@RiiftApart4 жыл бұрын
TheGadgetPanda South Africa, Brazil and maybe India are kind of in the same boat
@ab-do7li4 жыл бұрын
tyrone 2 wrongs don’t make a right
@mlgsty88804 жыл бұрын
4:22 Toycat really be calling Jamaica "British overseas territory" Im fairly sure Brits have not started their empire again lol
@LucifersTear4 жыл бұрын
Did you hear something I didn't? I didn't hear Jamaica in the whole video.
@micayahritchie71584 жыл бұрын
@@LucifersTear No he pointed at Jamaica. When he was talking about North American countries with left hand drive. He's not wrong. British overseas territories of the Americas do drive on the left. But Jamaica is the only orange country that was visible (being the third largest island in the Caribbean) and being a former colony they do drive in the left like all the other former colonies of the Caribbean. TLDR: He didn't say Jamaica, he pointed at Jamaica
@itsme-sn5gi4 жыл бұрын
@@micayahritchie7158 He ment Bermuda WHICH IS IN THE CONTINENT OF NORTH AMERICA and IS a British overseas territory!
@myowncomputerstuff4 жыл бұрын
@@itsme-sn5gi He was hovering over Jamaica though when he said it, since it's the only island large enough to be visible on the map. I know he knows it's a sovereign nation, but the optics of it were funny.
@TheLocalLt4 жыл бұрын
The British actually still do have a bunch of possessions in the Caribbean but no longer Jamaica
@Stoneeeeemo3 жыл бұрын
14:40 i mean, colonialism can still explain most of it, not because it made the blue countries richer necessairly, but because it made the red ones miserable, and that affects their future as a country in many ways
@gilneanskizwiadowca3 жыл бұрын
Most of the red countries were poor shithole without civilization until the Europeans arrived.
@Stoneeeeemo3 жыл бұрын
@@gilneanskizwiadowca oh my god
@nechyboi40643 жыл бұрын
@@gilneanskizwiadowca Damn, the level of ignorance here... 😂😂😂
@gucxo6272 жыл бұрын
@@gilneanskizwiadowca You are just wrong. India was actually one of the richest nation. Britain stole about 45 trillion dollars worth of money and stuff like gold diamonds(inflation considered) from India
@gilneanskizwiadowca2 жыл бұрын
@@gucxo627 There were no country named "India" before european colonization
@CyanWatercress44 жыл бұрын
When he talked about “non-landlocked neighbors”: *Sad Uzbekistan and Liechtenstein noises*
@WatcherofVideosSometimes4 жыл бұрын
Underrated comment
@tgrgdv26214 жыл бұрын
ShadowMC X they’re double landlocked, the countries that surround them are landlocked
@cadeh0724 жыл бұрын
12:06 You're obscuring my view! I can't see if the pacific islands have access to the sea.
@fallenangel_8993 жыл бұрын
i don’t understand why he doesn’t put his webcam on the left side
@cobinasaur3 жыл бұрын
@@fallenangel_899 Yeah, in the full world map he'd fit right in the Pacific without blocking land. But a lot of the time there's really nowhere the webcam could go without blocking something.
@fallenangel_8993 жыл бұрын
@@cobinasaur Irs more empty on the left side though
@jasonreed75223 жыл бұрын
@@fallenangel_899 cobinasour was agreeing with you on facecam location on maps being better in the southeast Pacific near south America not on top of Oceania. But toycat also makes a bunch of other content and usually the lower right is a hole in the UI of games or he keeps the focal point in the center of the screen.
@TunaBear643 жыл бұрын
19:09 Ukraine IDH: 0.779 Is considered First World Saudi Arabia IDH: 0.854 Is considered Third World This is very confusing At least my country Chile with an IDH of 0.851 is sometimes considered First World
@desertchoclo29103 жыл бұрын
Sabia q habria un weon q diria esto asi q no lo comente XDDD
@zeroyuki924 жыл бұрын
Rather than loose definition of invading, I think you have an even more loose definition of "not invading" if you really count China as not really invaded by UK
@thomasalberto6133 жыл бұрын
it's pretty obvious he is trying super hard to make the UK not seem that bad
@Vitorruy13 жыл бұрын
I could not believe when he said that, boxer rebellion? the opium wars?
@nuubier89113 жыл бұрын
@@thomasalberto613 I don't think that is the case, it is more likely just lack of knowledge. Don't assume malice where it can be explained with ignorance
@thisguy9763 жыл бұрын
@@nuubier8911 Hmm I don't think it is a lack of knowledge in this case.
@thisguy9763 жыл бұрын
@@nuubier8911 You can still have knowledge of something but choose to be ignorant of that.
@canteroski4 жыл бұрын
13:50 that map is so unaccurate. Many countries in the red part are even more developed than those in the blue part. Some South American countries are more developed and less poor than many countries in Eastern Europe.
@fgkuv52324 жыл бұрын
I havent been to south america but commies definitely have ruined eastern europe's economy
@Miguel923984 жыл бұрын
Funny that Australia is Global North, even though it is located in the southern hemisphere.
@0cyb3r04 жыл бұрын
@@fgkuv5232 As someone from Eastern Europe, the biggest economic ruin was in 1990 when the USSR dissolved and the entire country's economy shut down - the stores were empty and people lost their saving due to hyperinflation 🤔🤔 Ever since its lost 20% of its population to the USA and western Europe 🤔🤔🤔🤔
@fgkuv52324 жыл бұрын
@@0cyb3r0 i am from eastern europe too. The soviet system was doomed from the start. All total state planned economies have either collapsed or were reformed. So we are both right i guess
@0cyb3r04 жыл бұрын
@@fgkuv5232 I could say the same about the capitalist system, except when it fails (1920s, 2008, USA stock market in March 2020) someone else is found to blame (China, Communism, the poor, the immigrants) and not capitalism itself. This goes for most areas in life, not just economics.
@Kanelipullla4 жыл бұрын
16:30 Indeed, the history behind Helsinki Summer Olympics 1952 is pretty interesting case as it was originally supposed to be in 1940, but the WWII kinda made a change in the plans. And then there is that 1952 is like the early phase of the Cold War, so you can imagine how interesting it must have been try to organize an event like that😅
@kayseek12484 жыл бұрын
2:41 as an Australian, it can be really weird, especially in online events
@franchufranchu1194 жыл бұрын
If companies changed discounts depending on location, we'd have summer sale and christmas sale at the same time
Summer christmas is shit, but well, i can't change how my country works 🇦🇷
@allllyyyy4 жыл бұрын
@@tobiaspurcell3563 here on christmas day - it’s actually pretty cold this christmas
@archerdark75244 жыл бұрын
14:04 So according to this map, is Moldova, Albania and Serbia more developed than Chile, United Arab Emirates and China?
@speere88253 жыл бұрын
Yes. Serbia is far more developed then south america. Not sure about moldova or albania tho.
@archerdark75243 жыл бұрын
@@speere8825 Haha! Thats simply not true! I am living in Serbia, and i know very well, that this country is at the same level as Moldova and Albania. I quite sure that Chile is much more developed than Serbia. See, Chile is the member of the OECD, and Serbia is not. So. . .
@krotailen80253 жыл бұрын
@@archerdark7524 Chile is not most developed than Serbia. Chile have a lot of problems (social and economical) like his neighbourds countrys, idk a lot how is the situacion in Serbia but i saw videos on youtube and dont seems that bad. Moldova is, maybe, worst than Chile or Argentina but Serbia is not
@archerdark75243 жыл бұрын
@@krotailen8025 Where are you from?
@krotailen80253 жыл бұрын
@@archerdark7524 Argentina, u?
@dlairth4 жыл бұрын
re: “We didn’t invade China” - many have already mentioned the Opium Wars in the mid-19th century, but the British were also part of an (8-Nation) alliance that marched on Peking (as it was known in 1901) 'to relieve' the Boxer Rebellion.
@Manuel-gk3rv4 жыл бұрын
You should use the green shirt for every video tbh, it would greatly increase viewer enjoyment
@jack_schiro4 жыл бұрын
Don’t you love it when we’re still using maps where South Sudan ceases to exist? *pre-2012 intensifies*
@eltonmateusnevesneves3 жыл бұрын
Paraguay and Bolivia: yeay, we weren't invaded by britain Brazil: fine, I'll do it myself
@emadbu54 жыл бұрын
14:25 when Ukraine and Moldova are blue, while the UAE and Qatar are red bruh
@maxsenpai51074 жыл бұрын
Yeah the rich Arab states should be covered in blue
@jarskil88624 жыл бұрын
@@maxsenpai5107 Nah. In Rich arab countries there are billionaire oil sheiks,, but majority of people live in poverty.
@rofsrer4 жыл бұрын
@@jarskil8862 In Moldova also, but they don't even have oil barons...
@joemiller9473 жыл бұрын
In Qatar you can literally be flogged, Moldova is stuck in the 20th century but Qatar is stuck in the 17th century. Even if they host the world cup. Human rights in the Gulf states are embarrassingly awful
@spectre28893 жыл бұрын
Ukraine changed a lot since the past 10 years so now it isn't what you think it is
@Valkory4 жыл бұрын
yes my favorite thing getting cut in half in 12 different way
@maxwellli70574 жыл бұрын
Someone is gonna turn this into a weird kink
@Lyenati4 жыл бұрын
Flapjackpants shh
@dereksgc4 жыл бұрын
"Who knows what's up unless you got nukes going on" is a surprisingly accurate statement
@Rabid_Nationalist4 жыл бұрын
Toycat: Britain has never invaided China Opium wars: *ARE WE A JOKE TO YOU!?*
@lawden2104 жыл бұрын
He addressed that
@ToastieBRRRN4 жыл бұрын
What about the Boxer rebellion too?
@perpotet46294 жыл бұрын
@@ToastieBRRRN Not really a British invasion.
@maxwellli70574 жыл бұрын
@@perpotet4629 they occupied Beijing for a while I think
@perpotet46294 жыл бұрын
@@maxwellli7057 Your right they took Beijing, but it was not a brithis invasion in my opinion since the invading force was mostly Russian and Japanese.
@bobbobby31234 жыл бұрын
title should be 12 different ways to divide the world in 2, not half.
@cyberm10374 жыл бұрын
so disrespectful
@bobbobby31234 жыл бұрын
@@cyberm1037 how?
@nycuba74784 жыл бұрын
@@bobbobby3123 very disrespectful
@frxsty25854 жыл бұрын
Bob Bobby extremely disrespectful
@anawesomepet4 жыл бұрын
@@bobbobby3123 BING
@kyarumomochi51463 жыл бұрын
I love how blue part includes all of balkans but not countries like Turkey china or united arab Emirates wich are WAY richer
@OO-vo7vv3 жыл бұрын
Moreover, if you start to investigate some countries in Latin America are more developed than some in Eastern Europe such as Uruguay, Chile, Costa Rica and Panama.
@nickohira13973 жыл бұрын
Turkey is red that's so stupid 😑
@kyarumomochi51463 жыл бұрын
@@OO-vo7vv thats why that was stupud lmfao bulgaria on better wealth than turkey??
@thingy96283 жыл бұрын
This is because the map is based on the Brandt Line, which was made in the 1980s. Turkey, China and the UAE only became richer within the last 40 years, which means it isn’t reflected by the Brandt Line. The Balkans was richer before the wars as well. These are common problems when using a 40 year old map.
@withy40452 жыл бұрын
@@OO-vo7vv few countries in Southern Africa too
@milkshake8344 жыл бұрын
France: partly in the Southern Hemisphere because of overseas territories Uk: sad tea noises
@maxwellli70574 жыл бұрын
Surely because of the Falklands the UK would be on that list
@milkshake8344 жыл бұрын
Flapjackpants I think it’s because of French Guiana. French Guiana is fairly big but the Falkland Islands and all the others belonging to uk are very small. Plus Argentina might get mad if Falkland Islands made the uk partly in the Southern Hemisphere lol.
@Duke_of_Lorraine4 жыл бұрын
French Guyana is in the northern hemisphere. La Réunion island however is near Madagascar and is also an oversee department.
@milkshake8344 жыл бұрын
Duke of Lorraine true lol
@graveperil21694 жыл бұрын
France considered all its colonies as France, The UK considers them separate countries that they control
@patrickmartin33224 жыл бұрын
That money thing does actually sound like something Massachusetts would do.
@AM-du7si4 жыл бұрын
Massachusetts representing!!!!!
@AM-du7si4 жыл бұрын
By the way, a great state, you all should come if you can. Although CoViD-19....... Whatever.
@benpholmes4 жыл бұрын
Strangely, they do call themselves the "Commonwealth of Massachusetts".
@conlon4332 Жыл бұрын
2:17 It sounds like he says "normal hemisphere" haha!
@kuttispielt78014 жыл бұрын
The last map is wrong though. Switzerland would still be neutral
@randomotaku04 жыл бұрын
Trust me, Austria too.
@0Leonx04 жыл бұрын
@@randomotaku0 What a radical change for Austria
@Charizard15114 жыл бұрын
Man he is flexing a lot about being a brit
@dtheundertale3799 Жыл бұрын
20:00 i like how among the 3rd world countries are top income and nuclear countries
@tamu72434 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, Jamaica, my favorite British oversea territory
@micayahritchie71584 жыл бұрын
Lol to be fair, none of them were actually visible
@TheLocalLt4 жыл бұрын
Used to be, there still are a bunch nearby
@micayahritchie71584 жыл бұрын
@@TheLocalLt actually they were a crown colony never an overseas territory, the colonies that didn't belong to the crown became overseas territories
@neverletmego64144 жыл бұрын
“We didn’t invade China” laughs in 1st and 2nd Opium War
@yooooskheuduabdwkkq2473 жыл бұрын
Yeah
@skuarez3 жыл бұрын
But Serbia and Montenegro are both blue on the map, did the GDP map change or what happened? 9:13
@Wasabi000094 жыл бұрын
Colonialism defiantly had an effect on why some countries are richer and some are poorer. The argument that Eastern Europe is included doesn’t make sense as Western Europe is a lot richer than the east. Plus it wasn’t that long ago the northern countries have had a lot longer to build their wealth. Some countries haven’t even been independent for 100 years yet
@danielscanlon76284 жыл бұрын
That part of the video kinda rubbed me the wrong way. Wealth can be a very misleading way to characterize countries and comments from someone living comfortably in a country with a long history of colonialism, attempting to disregard the damaging effects of colonialism and mercantilism, just don't sit right. Wealth is largely an outcome of predetermined socioeconomic circumstances, not a choice.
@Wasabi000094 жыл бұрын
Daniel Scanlon couldn’t have said it better myself
@solehsolehsoleh4 жыл бұрын
What do they defy? Oh you mean "definitely" not "defiantly"
@Bogfrog14 жыл бұрын
I’ve noticed that a lot about Toycat: the unintentional glorification of colonialism (especially that of the British). And while sometimes loving ones country can be charming it can also cast a shadow over the terrible things that such countries have done. Personally I prefer GeographyNow for more unbiased geography vids. I don’t hate him, I just don’t like certain subjects to be overlooked.
@Bogfrog14 жыл бұрын
Also Toycat, with so much evidence of the scars of colonialism: the grouping of hostile groups and the separation of wealth and people, you can’t just write the reason off as lazy
@meneither38344 жыл бұрын
11:45 the UK completely invaded China. The British troops took Nanjing.
@carlosandleon4 жыл бұрын
Imo they should retake it today
@toastytoast98004 жыл бұрын
Nanjing is shanghai now i think, its a city of 30 million people, kinda hard to control
@attilaedem1014 жыл бұрын
that map use the "invaded" definition very losely considering not a single British soldier entered into the Hungarian part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire during WW1 (despite the Hungarian government outright asked british or french soldiers to separate the hungarian and romanians from each other, because the romanian violated EVERY single resolution) and Hungary still count as "invaded" - and beside that instance we can count only tourists as "invaders".
@samohtt4 жыл бұрын
@@toastytoast9800 nah they are still seperate cities to this day
@speedy012474 жыл бұрын
@@toastytoast9800 nope, shanghai is a different city (HOI4 player, I would know this, its one of the places Japan likes to invade the most)
@BabyDJ30303 жыл бұрын
“North Korea is not on the map I wonder what they did to be different to the southern neighbour” 8:39
@nikrai994 жыл бұрын
Whilst I know we’re just here for fun, I can’t help but discuss this: I totally agree that of course not all “rich” countries stole wealth from the “poor” ones, but you can flip it on its head and say that the poorest countries are the ones that were most decimated by colonialism at a time when others were getting rich, whether by direct rule or indirect power. Like, I know you could argue the exception of countries like the United States and Australia, but often we are looking at the wealth of colonial settlers. Consider the wealth gap of African Americans or Aboriginal Australians and the colonial settlers and if you were to consider them alone a country, you might not have been able to class them as “rich” until very recently or not at all. Not because the rich stole their money but because they’re denied opportunities to make their own. TL;DR rich countries aren’t rich solely because they stole poor nations money (of course they didn’t all have massive empires), but poor nations are poor because they weren’t given the same chance to develop an economy (and sometimes are based on arbitrary borders drawn by colonisers that make it impossible to unite all the peoples!) due to colonialism!
@Briiizzziii4 жыл бұрын
@@LordDoucheBags But you have war torn countries in Africa that are war torn because of different groups that were put together in one single country and didn't agree with each other
@nikrai994 жыл бұрын
@@LordDoucheBags I could've predicted someone would comment back with "but they built railways!!". Railways were built for enterprise, not for the love of the people living there. Railways may help to improve a country's economy but cannot heal social and environmental factors that hinder a country's growth. Don't believe an infantile narrative that any side was entirely good or entirely bad. Please diversify your arguments
@I_hate_Vegemite4 жыл бұрын
Yep, if left alone a population of about 200,000 Australian Aborigines as the inhabitants of an entire continent would still be happily living a Stone Age hunter gatherer existence with all their knowledge shared by story telling.
@jakeryan45454 жыл бұрын
I think what he was getting at is all of the controversial reasoning of why the "global north" was able to colonize in the first place. From time immemorial groups as diverse as the Asyrians, Aztec, Romans, Mongols, Japanese, Han, Celts, Germans, English, etc. have all waged war to expand their territories and subjugate their neighbors. The question isn't that a conquered nation would suffer (that is a given), but rather why were certain countries able to dominate on a global level. In the "global north" the answers range from the extreme left (the "global north" was only able to dominate because Europeans were basically evil and were the only ones that wanted to dominate) to the center (geography, unique economic situations (desiring global goods), diversity of countries) to the extreme right (Europeans were culturally superior to other groups in terms of industry and adventure). The interesting thing is that both the extreme right and the extreme left focus on people (and morals) where as the center tends to focus on geography / situations / less "morality" good or bad.
@LowellMorgan4 жыл бұрын
@@jakeryan4545 While I don't agree with the way you broke down the outlooks as being left, center, and right, it's worth noting that the cultures which have historically dominated the known world have shifted over time, almost "taking turns" and the recent Western domination may not seem as significant in the historical sense if we're trying to figure out if there is something "special" about white people. While the geographic theories of Guns, Germs, and Steel may not provide a unified field theory, the story of history itself might demonstrate that there is rarely a single cause to major events.
@coolconnor72354 жыл бұрын
Everbody: What is Pakistan's and India's border? Google Maps: Tom shrugging his shoulders.
@Flash4ML4 жыл бұрын
*laughs in Kashmir*
@2boysyou2be4 жыл бұрын
Yes, it is disputed
@Flash4ML4 жыл бұрын
@Jumbled Echo no, I actually live in America. Not all of us Americans are bad with geography :D
@seBASStianMunoz4 жыл бұрын
Mfs really be dismissing colonialism as a reason for why colonized countries are not so developed, from the country that colonized them😔🤙
@Komnenos834 жыл бұрын
Hes correct though. In order to "underdevelope" something, Africa must have been developed before, which sure wasnt the case.
@Venus-xj8bd3 жыл бұрын
@@Komnenos83 By today's standards most the world was underdeveloped at that time not just Africa.
@Komnenos833 жыл бұрын
@@Venus-xj8bd In comparison, Africa was higly underdeveloped prior to the 1880s already. Without colonialism africa would be even more underdeveloped.
@Venus-xj8bd3 жыл бұрын
@@Komnenos83 Well, as a North African we were actually even more developed than you at some point of history.
@suqmacoknbals49293 жыл бұрын
@@Venus-xj8bd well considering the commenter @philopator was born in the 21st century, i highly doubt anywhere in the world was more advanced than his country considering he lives in modern day. if you meant it in a way meaning that at some point your country was more advanced than his at a matching time in history, you may well be right considering north Africa had held some of the most powerful nations. and about how "Mfs really be dismissing colonialism as a reason for why colonized countries are not so developed, from the country that colonized them😔🤙" i would rather live in a heavily colonized and British influenced country like Canada than somewhere that hadn't been colonized as heavily like the Congo or Nigeria. pretty sure quality of life is a lot better in the more colonized regions of the world, because although the British brought warcrimes with them they also brought government, infrastructure, mining, fur trading, fishing, logging, a railroad, currency and an army and navy for national security.
@tlowry63384 жыл бұрын
15:08 ah yes the incredibly safe country where you can get a life sentence for insulting the king
@ibx2cat4 жыл бұрын
or defacing the money lol
@marco.trevisan3 жыл бұрын
Authoritarian and safe are different concepts. The US is not authoritarian, you can say whatever about the president, but let's see how safe Detroit is...
@bvd_vlvd3 жыл бұрын
@@marco.trevisan it's pretty authoritarian but it's still a republic. *Throwback to drump facis memes which apply to all modern US presidents*
@kennywelter98863 жыл бұрын
Then dont insult him
@milkshake8344 жыл бұрын
Toycat: there’s 60 million ppl in uk Other 7.5 million ppl: am I a joke to u?
@GeographyWorld4 жыл бұрын
Maybe he's saying that Scotland and Northern Ireland aren't part of the UK!
@jacobarmour63254 жыл бұрын
Ok
@weldin4 жыл бұрын
mumbo for mayor I like your username
@formeraccount15294 жыл бұрын
Cinestar Productions spammer
@milkshake8344 жыл бұрын
Mzak1212 spammer
@telotawa3 жыл бұрын
>colder country leads to more success >singapore, australia
@UnknownRager964 жыл бұрын
Day 1 of asking Toycat to sit there for 20 minutes not talking on his phone browsing reddit
@phil62174 жыл бұрын
2020 NEEDS THIS
@luisramos1234 жыл бұрын
"Portugal is the eastern Europe of western Europe" ouch Toycat, that actually hurt... (but sadly you're absolutely correct).
@carlosmagalhaes71094 жыл бұрын
*TRIGGERED* Portugal may be the poorest country in Western Europe but it's a lot richer than most countries in Eastern Europe.
@MarianBuraga3 жыл бұрын
I don't know why Eastern Europe should be an etiquette for pejorative interpretations. It is a wonderful part of our continent, rich in history and culture, diverse and, most important, with tough people that proved they can get up after half a decade of communism. I'd take it as a compliment.
@Luis.A.Angeli3 жыл бұрын
Poha Portugal vocês roubaram o nosso ouro e agora somos um país pobre de 3 mundo...
@imdone84423 жыл бұрын
@@carlosmagalhaes7109 You know that actually a few Eastern European countries are wealthier now in terms of GDP per capita/ income than Portugal?
@carlosmagalhaes71093 жыл бұрын
@@imdone8442 Yeah
@storgall2 жыл бұрын
last map hits differently now
@robezy04 жыл бұрын
"Landlocked nations are generally less connected." Switzerland: Is the most globalized nation in the world lol
@JH-jk3nm4 жыл бұрын
there are exceptions to every rule in geography, but due to history landlocked nations are generally more turned off economically
@vihaandoesthings62904 жыл бұрын
@@JH-jk3nm true that
@danielbishop18634 жыл бұрын
That's because France, Germany, and Italy decided to play nice with them. Other landlocked countries have less friendly neighbors.
@antovador4 жыл бұрын
Switzerland the only landlock nation to have navigators to compete on seas worldwide.
@skyfallrao20954 жыл бұрын
It’s just because they got banks for countries to store money and have mountains protecting them lol
@haikalabbas95394 жыл бұрын
10:16 The Maldives is politically part of Asia, not Africa. Although to be fair I think you were trying to say Mauritius anyway.
@alanandrade20834 жыл бұрын
Haikal Abbas He meant Réunion, did he not? The three islands that are in the Indian oceans which are higher in GDP are Maldives, Seychelles, and Réunion, I think. Mauritius is probably poorer than Réunion.
@haikalabbas95394 жыл бұрын
@@alanandrade2083 The three blue dots in the Indian Ocean are (from north to south) the Maldives, Seychelles and Mauritius. Reunion is an overseas department of France so it doesn't really count as a country in itself and is therefore not represented on the map. Mauritius actually has the highest GDP amongst that group by a fairly large gap, even including Reunion.
@alanandrade20834 жыл бұрын
Haikal Abbas Oh okay, that makes sense. So, those four islands have a higher GDP PPP than most of Africa. Réunion is just a territory of France, so it does not count as a dot on the map, huh. Understood. You were right, then. Sorry and thank you.
@haikalabbas95394 жыл бұрын
@@alanandrade2083 Reunion does pretty well if you do want to factor it in, its a bit behind Mauritius but it still does better than either Seychelles or the Maldives. The thing is that this holds true for most small island nations anyway, they have plentiful resources but a relatively small population size so GDP can be dispersed across fewer people, thus PPP will naturally be higher than say a country with the same amount of resources but a much larger population.
@newwaveinfantry8362 Жыл бұрын
2:15 - Not Serbia. Macedonia, Albania and Kosovo. Also Gabon, not Equatorial Guinea.
@PadecMaybeReal4 жыл бұрын
"Thailand should be an exception." *sad Malaysian noises*
@jenniespankedmybigasstheni92113 жыл бұрын
ikr, Malaysia is richer than Thailand tbh, look at Malaysia’s GDP per capita is higher than Thailand’s, and Malaysia is absolutely safer than Thailand, Malaysia issa 2nd safest country in southeast asia after Singapore.
@planetdestroyer11113 жыл бұрын
He might not have been to Thailand. He was referring to nations he's been to.
@norielsylvire40972 жыл бұрын
That map is crearly very dumb. Ukraine and Moldova which are in Europe are quite poor, while other countries like Saudi Arabia and UAE have more money. This is coming from a Romanian (right next to Moldova). This map is dumb af.
@brokenbutler4 жыл бұрын
4:23 Did he just call Jamaica a "British overseas territory"? Screams in Reggae
@siddharthiyer72444 жыл бұрын
I DON'T LIKE REGGAE I LOVE IT
@lenaz11782 жыл бұрын
This is the most stampylongnose human I’ve ever seen without actually being stampylongnose
@adamh29004 жыл бұрын
13:57 This map is BS, the poorest countries in Europe are included with the economically developed countries but the oil rich Gulf states are not
@The98597thMark4 жыл бұрын
It depends on perspective and what the map was trying to convey I guess. Yes if you're just comparing to the GDP per capita map, it's very much less exact and western-biased. But there's other economic indicators besides raw $$$. e.g. Saudi Arabia may be a very wealthy country but its economy lacks diversity and isn't (yet?) structured for long term success. Many eastern European countries are the opposite, their economies are relatively stable and industrialised and not going anywhere. They're just not rich. But yes I do think they've taken these principles and then approximated them to be vaguely racist 😬
@Juipukka3 жыл бұрын
@@The98597thMark This. Countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE and Qatar may be rich in cash, but that's only because of oil.They all have terrible human rights, and their main income is oil which won't fund them for centuries.
@gamermapper3 жыл бұрын
Also so-called "Taiwan" is there but not China. China is the richest country in the world while Taiwan is a breakway state that's basically pointless at this point.
@gamermapper3 жыл бұрын
Also, Cuba is way more developed than America.
@caltheodore42013 жыл бұрын
Totally agreed!
@nvsm4 жыл бұрын
10:45 I think Brazil and India are more influential than Botswana.
@Enafa6664 жыл бұрын
Economically I think Botswana is doing better than Brazil and India 10:30
@aerohydra38494 жыл бұрын
@@Enafa666 GDP per Capita isn't everything though. Monaco has a much higher GDP per capita than the U.S., does it mean Monaco is more influential? Generally smaller countries have an advantage since the wealth can be more evenly distributed.
@diegocordova6731 Жыл бұрын
Man the video was excellent, important and interesting information with a little of humor also your explanation is very good congratulations greetings from Mexico 🇲🇽
@Jacobi96854 жыл бұрын
2:59 “It’s funny when Americans say we drive on the wrong side of the road” 3:58 (Close to a minute later) Proceeds to say they drove on the wrong side of the road. (Being the left side)
@H1ydra3 жыл бұрын
16:47 everybody gangsta till greenland has data but western sahara dosent
@mylesjordan38794 жыл бұрын
13:43 ‘we use boats for the vast majority of shipping’ ... yes, yes we do.
@7822welshsteam3 жыл бұрын
A shipment can also be on a plane.
@francodl794 жыл бұрын
8:50 fyi that part of South America is called the "Southern Cone".
@drife90363 жыл бұрын
9:15 That map didn’t age really well seeing how devalued and poor Argentina is right now
@bvd_vlvd3 жыл бұрын
Some maps are definitely outdated like North Macedonia being excluded from nato
@moondust23654 жыл бұрын
It felt weird to me when I first found out about what the actual meaning of 1st World, 2nd World, and 3rd World countries are. Heck, I was surprised to find out that there actually _was_ such a thing as 2nd World countries. If you go by wealth, it makes sense that my country, the Philippines, is a 3rd World country. But by alliance, it feels wrong. We were and technically still are an ally of the US after all. Although we weren't part of the, quote-unquote, "Allied Powers", but still... Eventually I just ended up semi-permanently using the actual economic division system. I still use the world system when talking to my fellow Filipinos since we view that as an economic system anyway. But yeah, Developed, Developing, and Underdeveloped is way clearer.
@FriendlyALB3 жыл бұрын
Quote-on quote*
@danielclasen8094 жыл бұрын
"Lets divide the world in half" he means divide into two unequally-sized parts
@David236663 жыл бұрын
ibx2cat: Uk has never invaded china 55 days at peking: Am a Joke to you?
@Bacopa684 жыл бұрын
No cats in Oregon is probably legal. Pretty sure that no cash in Mass would be illegal under the Interstate Commerce Clause.
@realhawaii5o4 жыл бұрын
13:55 Canary Islands are in red for some reason. Huh
@norsktorsk89824 жыл бұрын
Vive la Independent Canary Islands
@ekvedrek4 жыл бұрын
Because it’s Serbia.
@santiir14 жыл бұрын
@@norsktorsk8982 no.
@carlosmagalhaes71094 жыл бұрын
@@santiir1 yes
@santiir14 жыл бұрын
@@carlosmagalhaes7109 Azores independentes então haha
@PuNicAdbo2 жыл бұрын
23:40 sadly 😥 you have kinda predicted the future here
@deldarel4 жыл бұрын
4:00 funnily enough, also the Dutch colonies (surinam, South Africa, Indonesia) and trading partner (Japan) drive on the left side of the road even though the Dutch never did.
@xwtek35054 жыл бұрын
Actually Dutch drove on the left side too. For some reason when Dutch switched, the colonies don't
@deldarel4 жыл бұрын
@@xwtek3505 right was the first and only national consensus. Before that, much like with time, it varied from region to region until it was standardised.
@zinniaward85494 жыл бұрын
My mum and I (from England) were in Sweden once. We were coming out of a teeny tiny airport in the car and the road was empty. We had an argument about which side to drive on. My mum insisted it was the left because apparently that's how it was last time she was there and I was sure it was on the right. Eventually, we almost drove into another car. I was right
@JustaboysMa4 жыл бұрын
is that a pun?
@LuminantLion4 жыл бұрын
"These are non-aligned countries" But, Turkey's been a NATO member from the start
@nickohira13973 жыл бұрын
True
@thegentlemanfish75044 жыл бұрын
Me: Sees countries that drive on the left. Also me: British Empire is that you!?
@ACE234dm4 жыл бұрын
Toycat: there is a country on every continent that drives on the left side of the road Antarctica: well yes, but actually no
@maddiward71584 жыл бұрын
Hey! American here! Not trying to be technical but you did ask for an explanation about how states can make laws evading the federal government. In your example where a state is trying to change their money or eliminate money, that would in fact violate something called the “commerce clause” which allows the legislature to regulate interstate commerce. This means that the federal government can interfere if a state is violating any regulation regarding trade between states. Operating outside of the national bank would violate those regulations. However!.... a great example is marijuana legalization, many states are growing, selling, and consuming a federally illegal substance without a care in the world. But (again, because of the commerce clause) should you try and transport that illegal substance across state lines (even into another state where it is legal) that would violate interstate commerce regulations. You cannot transport federally illegal items within states. So basically while each state can make its own rules it is still heavily limited by the federal government, thanks to very technical interpretations of the constitution.
@micayahritchie71584 жыл бұрын
Toycat: says British overseas territories Also Toycat: points at Jamaica the first British Crown Colony to get independence
@srishtishetty53724 жыл бұрын
Mughal Empire and British colonialism shrunk India's GDP from 25% of world share to 4% by 1950. The literal definition of colonialism includes 'occupying and exploiting a territory economically'. And let's not forget the consequences of economic exploitation that impact generations of people post colonialism. Very off putting when someone shrugs off colonialism like it's no big deal.
@Sjejebrbfushsvdheieve3 жыл бұрын
If your driving from a county that drives on the right to a county that drives on the left, how does that work?
@jamesbarrett68144 жыл бұрын
The world is flat we have got members all over the globe
@cowboymooman87764 жыл бұрын
"The Flat Earth Society Has Members All Around The Globe"
@benjaminpujol7114 жыл бұрын
Yes
@lauren93734 жыл бұрын
@@cowboymooman8776 I really hope this was a real quote 😂😂
@thebeanz65934 жыл бұрын
@@lauren9373 it is
@TobuscusGameing4 жыл бұрын
1:47 Britain should be the same colour as Brazil and France because of the South Sandwich Islands, the Falklands etc America for their Pacific islands like American Samoa Norway for Bouvet I
@GeographyWorld4 жыл бұрын
But France has overseas departments which are integral parts of the country. Britain has overseas territories which are mostly self governing and not part of the UK.
@TobuscusGameing4 жыл бұрын
Geography World Do you want Britain to empire again? They could
@GeographyWorld4 жыл бұрын
@@TobuscusGameing preferably not since I live in Ireland.
@presidenttogekiss6354 жыл бұрын
To say Germany will ALWAYS be more influential than Brazil is a stretch. Brazil is poor now, but that's not to say it can't overtake germany at some point. If someone in 1850 said that Japan would have a larger economy than any European nation a century and a half later, they would be laughed out of the room, but behold, that is exactly what happened.
@onionskin32544 жыл бұрын
No
@thothrax56214 жыл бұрын
Dude Google not being specific about nation borders isn't them being lazy, it's them respecting sometimes EXTREMELY contentious disputes. Imagine if you lived in a part of the world where you believed yourself to be a citizen of one country, but another one started laying claim to you and your land, and you had to risk your life to try and maintain what you believed to be your home and lifestyle. Then the most recognizable and universal map of the world with no stakes in your very real and personal conflict, decided to proclaim that you and your land belonged to someone else. That would be crushing and insulting, especially when the only thing deciding what belongs to whom is entirely determined by people agreeing on a map. Maybe look a bit closer into foreign issues before making claims that Google needs to pick a side.
@bea78232 жыл бұрын
I’m fairly sure it was a joke ma dude.
@joeyshmoey66592 жыл бұрын
Chill.
@TheDudey2 жыл бұрын
toycat is never 100%, it wasn't serious
@riz0n3rlol584 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one thinking about Yakko's world everytime someone mentions Botswana? :D
@geo31724 жыл бұрын
Y s ame
@spacecatkin4 жыл бұрын
Me
@BrecklandSpotting3 жыл бұрын
Botswanaaaaaa
@marcopeel3 жыл бұрын
I never hear about Botswana from you tubers.fascinating country