13 OF THE WORST and Dumbest American Cars of the 1960s!

[@ramblerdave1339]

After seeing one of 1956's finest cars in the thumbnail, I clicked just to say this is is going to be BS.

[@Roger-vz7ol]

You got that right. It is BS.

[@bobpierce115]

The opening picture is a '55 or '56 Oldsmobile. Plus he declares the Ranchero a "failure". SUCH A "FAILURE" IT RAN from 1957-1979. If that's a failure, where do I sign up? This NARRATOR and his worst, dumbest, silliest car videos are the real failures on You Tube auto channels.

[@nannorman4624]

It was a 1954 Olds, had white convertible great car.

[@bobpierce115]

@@nannorman4624 It's a '56 since I've had time to check. I invite you to check it out for yourself. Having said that, the '54-'56 models were an Olds tri-5 of their own.

[@MikeCarroll-lz7mv]

Amen

[@garymoon2829]

The "narrator" is A-I (artificial intelligence). That's part of why this is garbage.

[@TJD656]

I was thinking about the Ranchero, wasn't made for off road, wasn't made to tow a trailer. It was made to put a crushed up Lincoln in the bed and have ODD JOB take the gold out of the crushed Lincoln. That was, GOLDFINGERS GOLD. In James Bond, the scrap yard and crusher were in Miami FL. North River dr. On the Miami River. The junk yard and crusher are still there.

[@MaggieGentry-fv8mt]

Poor guys who owned these cars on this video must have been upset with what was said about their cars.

[@MrDavePed]

The Ranchero was COOL.

[@bpigleason]

I was pleased to find that I wasn't alone in my perception of this video.

[@weswhitlinger1706]

Totaly disagree with this bullshit.

[@brucejonsson3149]

What a waste of time

[@henryhill3778]

All AI Bullshit

[@tonystone1016]

The old Cadillacs had an elegance and style that hold up. Tastes have changed but Cadillac has always been the top of the line for me.

[@jnstonbely5215]

Not these days! They betrayed the overwhelming majority of Cadillac fanciers by bonding to the SUV craze, but Worse, discontinuing their mainstay solid selling Sedans ,such as the Sedan de Ville, and Park Ave. Today they’re selling some Escalades, but Laid an Egg the size of a watermelon when they went full- in with those dumb advised EV’s !! The Cadillac Motor Division needs to be reborn, and it’s first Great Step will be the ouster of Mary Barra, who I view as the Cheadle Of Cadillac, for her many poor decisions , and in replacing her with an alert person ( ok ! I’ll say it : “Guy” who knows and loves cars especially Cadillacs and giving him the resources he need with a team of GM ( or outside Designers and Mechanical Engineers to Do The Job ! And I’ll be the first happy customer to come back!

[@garyporter516]

I disagree with most of your choices and opinions.

[@santiagorubio833]

Yo también estoy en desacuerdo con la mayoría de las cosas afirmadas en este video. Quien lo hace esun ignorante.

[@joemannix4774]

Any one who things American cars are stupid knows nothing about cars !

[@gerneyquintero5318]

A base Cuda was just that base. Mustang also had base modal as well as Chevy camaro had a base model all with a 6 as well as the v8 if you wanted more power. I miss that Era 😂😂

[@londolly]

a mustang was a total piece of junk scrap cheap garbage car ever made next to maby a rambler

[@henrikstenstrom79]

Worst cars...? In what Way? A Studebaker lark with proper rust protection could last you a life time.. It also sold very well in its first years. The same could be said about the Catalina or the Buick, extremely comfortable cars at that. Try to make a video on a subject on which you have at least SOME knowledge...growing vegetables perhaps?

[@johnlangford-e2k]

falcon ute very successful in australia

[@Kirk-n6w]

Totally disagree about most of this video. Especially the Cadillac, my grandparents drove their 61 over most of the US, car was very comfortable, and cruised with ease, they loved that car, and they drove Cadillacs their entire life

[@MikeCarroll-lz7mv]

Could not have said it better.

[@icewaterslim7260]

Somebody rebuilt a Lark with a small block Chevy. First class job. It's on KZbin somewhere posted by a mechanic. You gotta start with something rust free.

[@wilburfinnigan2142]

Who ever put this together had their head up their Butt !!! First of they compared the COMPACT Ford Falcon Ranchero to a full size truck, it was not and never claimed to be, it was a COMPACT pickup awlaw the Ford/Mazda Courier, a compact pick up. It never claimed to be a full size truck just as the Chevy ElCamino never claimed to be a full sized truck you compared it to !!! Geeeeese !!! and christ the base Barracuda was not a muscle car, it was an economy mid sized car !!! I'm outta here this is BS !!!

[@iket.9930]

Who or whatever wrote the script for for this absolute waste of time is 100% clueless. This should be considered comedy.

[@lindarajek8252]

We disagree with this whole video. You do not know what you are talking about.

[@donwey444]

This is what you get if you didn't live during that time. The Cadillac was not a car built for everyone. It was built and sold to wealthy people. It was not intended to be a race car.

[@brucepowell7986]

not a ford fan but th earlie 60s rncheros were not bad this ai garbage is just that

[@DannyLeech-s2d]

BORING story yelling and to repetitive

[@JeffreyAlbin]

How stupid are the projector's. Any one of these vehicles would be an honor to own then and now .

[@patrickmoss-j7c]

Sold all of these types of cars to many happy people never had any serious come back on any of these in my 55 years of selling used cars

[@caretta1000]

The 62 Catalina shown is one of the most in demand models even today. Fireball Roberts won Daytona in 62.

[@iket.9930]

Pontiac dominated stock car racing until the GM ban in 1963.

[@bobharrison7693]

Really dumb putting "base Barracuda" on this list. No one bought the base model. I bought a '67 Barracuda 383 fast back new. It was a great car and I never saw a base model.

[@ramblerdave1339]

There must have been one, where else would all the Mopar musclecar guys get all those dog dish hubcaps, they are so excited to ruin their cars looks. Every one I knew threw them away.

[@MikeCarroll-lz7mv]

If you think the 440 coronet was "underpowered " you never drove one with the 383 4bbl.

[@henryhill3778]

Exactly

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@thomasharding1838]

Generally speaking, the base models of most of the cars you featured were NOT aimed at people who were looking to run with the GTOs but people who wanted to afford something that looked like it might. And wasn't that Plymouth "Belvedere" that you featured actually a "Fury"?

[@jeffbarron5500]

the first one shown, the 65 ford ranchero. I had one of these in HS, it sported a 4 speed and a 289 v-8. It was a road killer when I placed a 9" tunnel ram on it. Even stock it kicked butt. So I assume you weren't from the 50 or 60 or even the 70 as you have zero clue about this fun vehicle

[@jeffbarron5500]

On the second one you have zero clue, so 2 epic fails by your tired squak

[@jeffbarron5500]

I won't waste anymore time on your tired video, esp not 57:07 LOLser!

[@jeffbarron5500]

I forgot, I had one with a 383 in it and dual quads, no one with a clue got anything but the 383 ( so nice try shump)

[@icewaterslim7260]

The Coronet 440 resonated with Police Departments. That was the targeted market. I wish I'd not traded in the 1960 Falcon Ranchero for a pristine looking Peugeot Diesel. The Ranchero was a six cylinder. It might well still run if you took care of it. The Peugeot had a cracked head. Since thats common for Peugeot diesels I sold it for $30. The Ranchero was actually very practical and economical and easy to work on. Girls didn't mind riding in it and said it was cute. You carry pieces of furniture in it. You don't tow skiboats with it. One of my better rides . . . The Ranchero not the Peugeot . . . Not the Diesel anyway.

[@RayMainBagpiper]

Hokay, bag on the Ranchero 50 times with the same sentence and we get the point. (dump the AI). The 140 and 177 straight 6 engines were adequate for the job and got impressive fuel mileage for the time. Easy to fix good fuel economy and reliable dependability along with being inexpensive to fix and a multitude of parts interchange ability without breaking the bank. I would say the Ranchero's were probably one of the most unsung hero's of their time.

[@J.R.in_WV]

The base model Camaro and Mustang came with average car sized inline 6’s as well…..this sounds like it was written by a ten year old.

[@henryhill3778]

Exactly

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@TigerDominic-uh1dv]

I ❤ the the 59 and 60 Lark

[@TomBales]

This channel is fantastic If you need a lesson then how to say the same thing over again about six times before moving on to the next segment.

[@wiiambarnarx8485]

I noticed that immediently after the second car. Spending to much time on one car. Talk about repedative and boring.

[@timothydigiuseppe1753]

Exactly.

[@chrisrnielsen]

And for the Pontiac Le Mans they picture a Catalina.... OBVIOUSLY these vids are not produced by an American producer...

[@garymoon2829]

These vids are all created by "ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE", which means STUPID. The people who are involved in creating this are morons.

[@honestone490]

Why do you trash the Lark without comparing it to it's small car competitors of it's day. You also ignore the fact that a V8 Lark could turn out a 0 to 60 mph time of around 10 seconds, which was on par with much larger cars sold by it's competitors. By comparison, the Ford Falcon, Mercury Comet, Chevrolet Corvair and Plymouth Valiant) which arrived on the scene in 1960, only the Valiant could break the 20-second mark from 0-60 mph. None of the Big Three compacts offered a V8.

[@PrimoGIU]

Sorry, YOU LOSE! My stepmother LOVED her base Barracuda - she got the look AND her economy, best of both worlds that MANY WANTED at the price they could afford... they knew what they were getting! How can you dismiss "base" models so easily? They allow poorer people to enter markets THEY WANTED and would otherwise be priced out of. I liked every car on this list and owned several. I also LOVED riding in my grandfather's 1961 Caddy "62", it felt like floating on a cloud.

[@Dadsezso]

My parents bought a 69 Buick deuce and a quarter. I was a teen then but not old enough to drive yet. I never remember hearing them complain about the car and as a passenger, liked it well enough. They traded cars every year though and went to a 1970 Lincoln Continental Mark III after that so, maybe they didn't like the Buicks that much.

[@DennisShook-k7w]

You're just bashing all big cars aren't you?😢😮

[@bobpierce115]

You're asking this of this "narrator" I hope. The answer would be yes.

[@mossi408]

At least they always try to. 😢

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@allenwayne2033]

Whoever created this vid doesn't know squat about his subject matter.

[@richardrice8076]

7:32 and the Mustang and Camaro were offered with 6 cyl.s just like this. Not everybody bought these cars to go fast, they liked the looks but didn't want big block power. Known as 6 cyl. muscle cars.13:32 why are you showing that? You couldn't find any restored to stock '61's? What a joke.

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@JeffreyAlbin]

The ranchero is so cool .

[@londolly]

they were never popular at all and ugly too

[@DanielBODell]

This guy is a nut .most guys didn’t know that you could take a318 and punch it out .120 thou,and you gotta 340,heads are the same!

[@thomasharding1838]

I had a 59 Plymouth Fury with the 318 2 barrel. In the mid sixties, I did a few little mods to it to get a little more response. I replaced the pistons with ForgeTrue pistons and the cam with a 57 Sport Fury 318 cam which was the most radical I could find. Oh, and the pistons required that I bore the engine out to 334 cubic inch. And I did mill the heads a little so that it wound up with 14 to 1 compression ratio. Oh, and I did replace the intake manifold with a 57 Fury dual quad which meant I had to put two Carter AFB Daytona Specials on it. When the temperature was cold, I had to use two batteries, in series for 24 volts, to crank that beast but with its 3 speed Torqueflite push button transmission, it would leave the 389 GTOs in the rear view mirror.

[@MikeCarroll-lz7mv]

Gosh!! Who would have guessed that big Buick convert would handle heavily?? This AI asshole doesn' t have clue about anything automotive.

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@garymoon2829]

There's no "this guy"...this vid is done by artificial intelligence. That's why it is so terrible, wrong, stupid, repetitious, and boring.

[@74millwright]

The base Cuda was an economy car. Why are you comparing it to a performance model?

[@londolly]

because you could get a 440 or 426 hemi in it thats why

[@alejandroeguren4187]

Why do you portrait a 1956 Oldsmobile if you are going to refer to cars of the '60s? OLDS was one of the finest makes in American car history! Sorry for being confrontational but the only "dumbest" here, are the guys that made this report.

[@petedube9367]

This guy just likes to listen to his boring shit.

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@bajaskier]

Interesting, but could have been 1/6 the length without all the annoying repetition.

[@KurtRiese]

The 67 tempest was a work of art wonderful car

[@rolandirle2699]

Do your home work before posting click bates.

[@MikeCarroll-lz7mv]

If you wanted "luxury" in a 60 Mercury, then buy a Park lane.

[@tedsmythe]

This guy cant be for real. Hes trolling us and making money at the same time. Total bs all the way through. All of those cars were competitive with the larger engine choices offered.

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@bullettube9863]

If you are going to do a video about the worse cars of the 1960s, DO NOT show photos of cars that have been customized with different wheels, engines and accessories that were not available from the dealer in the 1960s! AND please do some research so you don't insult the intelligence of people who grew up knowing these cars first hand. Most of these cars were financial successes and bought by a huge number of people. The Ranchero for instance was the same size as the millions of compact trucks from Japan that copied it! And, people don't always buy a car to race, they just want good transportation with style!

[@mikefrech1123]

"The Ambassador 880." (Shows Rambler 660).

[@glennholmes9587]

The Falcon Ranchero was a super cool car with the 265 or 289 engine you have no idea what your talking about,

[@tedsmythe]

260

[@TJD656]

He is correct 260 cu.in. 265 was chevys. I was trying to explain to a young man there was a RANCHERO in the movie goldfinger. Do you remember. ODD JOB put a crushed Lincoln in the bed at the junk yard.

[@MikeCarroll-lz7mv]

Who in the hell bought a Cadillac to be a road racer?? I personally think the 61 GM products were the best of the decade

[@iket.9930]

61 & 62 were GM's two best years in the 60's.

[@thomasharding1838]

Tell the owner of the Barracuda that he put the replacement brake rotor on the wrong side. they are drilled and slotted which is good but the slots need to go in the opposite direction so they will throw water and debris outward.

[@cavalierguy6754]

All the factors you're stating is from someone who is totally ignorant of the era! Lot of those cars are Still in high demand! Your description of Caddys and other full size cars were Not made Sporty or Muscle! They were made luxurious and smooth riding! Nod Body gave a Shit about gas mileage or Hp except for the Muscle car era!

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@RonGreeneComedian]

About the only thing we all can agree on is that this guy repeats himself, repeats himself, repeat himself, repeats himself. 😂

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@johnfrasca9928]

I bought a 63, Falcon Ranchero with a Hi-Po 289, 4-speed trans and it kicked butt as long as you Bolted a NY Round Sewer cover in the bed!

[@glennholmes9587]

This moderator is full of it.

[@larrycarroll5783]

To me, the worst styling of the 1960,s simply HAS to be the 1961 Plymouth Sport Fury. Its stylists must have come from Transylvania! Larry Carroll

[@garymoon2829]

Clearly you have forgotten the grotesque Plymouth Valiant. I know, because I owned one, my first car...This was a car that makes the Pontiac Astek look like a Maserati by comparison.

[@PatriciaMcmullen-p7n]

I do tee one car nowadays that I see as being anything to boast about. I think they all look alike...yuck!

[@RoyCousins]

Dumb poorly researched video. 👎

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@JagdishBakrania]

I engineer and tool maker it is designed beautiful and perfectly made why don't you put a nasty comment on British car.British Leyland Morris Minor Morris 1100 British badly made

[@John-jl9de]

This guy or AI that is commenting is full of it, no thanks.

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@robyneberhard1228]

Why would you show a beautiful 62 Pontiac Catalina and talk about how bad the Tempest was?

[@henryhill3778]

Talks about a TEMPEST and shows a CATALINA!

[@WThomasButler]

Sounds like it's an AI story.

[@garymoon2829]

Yep. You're right. It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@NormanAllen-ps9ju]

I don't agree with anything you say ; especially when you say it over and over again ! I got it the first time !

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@RobertBurroughs-qw7uw]

the AI ruins the vid

[@RussBland]

The commentator needs a lesson on the base models and as he says Dumbest.

[@williamcamp3556]

Anytime you compare a base model with the rest of the line is going to fall short because it was meant to be that way just for somebody who wants a bare bones basic car to get back and forth which all manufacturers produced in all models So once you wake up and put your head out of your butt

[@AnthonyHolinko]

WHAT THE HELL DO YOU KNOW!?

[@KenThomas-w4s]

I DISAGREE AS WELL. BUT LET EM THINK WHAT THEY WILL.

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@davesmith7993]

Why are you showing a really nice 1962 Pontiac Catalina convertible while talking about a totally different Tempest model? Do some research before narrating your videos.

[@chucks6879]

Thanks everyone I was getting ready to waste an hour to watch this then checked the comments more uninformed bs

[@jimenz6548]

You had a Catalina in place of the Tempest....Catalina I dont remember being a trans axle car!!

[@stevecurtiss46]

Your ideation is flawed, these cars were all appealing or they would not still be in demand on the old car ,arket.

[@eugenepiurkowski5439]

Why do you show a 1961 Fury when talking about a 1961 Belvedere??????????????? 3-1-8- engine? Give me a break. The automatic transmission was one of the most rugged and respected transmissions and was used for years and years. Where do you get your info?

[@davidhansen6009]

Every one of your videos that I have watched "10 to 20" of them, have shown Me, that you know nothing about automobiles. In every installment, whatever the subject, you show the incorrect model, year, make or the equipment to which you critiquing! Please do everyone a service and stop doing whatever it is that you think you are doing!

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@herbs4921]

The author of this piece knows nothing about automobiles. Just some examples- the header of this piece says it is going to tell us about the worst cars of the 1960's while showing a picture of a 1955 or 1956 Oldsmobile. The segment on the 1964 mercury montclair keeps describing it as a "mid-sized" car. It was a full-sized car that competed in the "mid-priced" market. There were many other errors as well. Im certainly not going to waste any more time watching videos on this channel.

[@74millwright]

I had a '66 Ranchero that fit the bill for my needs, light but bulky items. Hauled 600 lbs. no sweat. The El Camino by Chevy cost nearly double the Ranchero.

[@markwhite1333]

If these cars are from the 1060s, why did you start out with a 1958 model car?

[@Johnny64ism]

1960's *

[@jackvolta3489]

Funny how then they were considered undesirable models, today they're customized head turners! Funny how a lot of them that you showed turned out to be just that. However nostalgic there's always room for improvement. 😜👍

[@kimjoshy1]

ford ute ,love it perfect tradie car australia sold millions

[@johnkelly8525]

Spot on ,this guy is a dick

[@ralphanderson2603]

JUNK

[@johncantelon7071]

The commentary is almost identical for the different cars shown. This is a poorly thought out and poorly presented video.

[@MikeCarroll-lz7mv]

Do you know what you're talking about??Obviously not. You diss the 880 while showing a classic 660. Were you awake

[@brucejonsson3149]

Don't waste your time on this review. He repeats the same things over and over on each car. His time frame and time comparisons are all over 2 decades. Real mussel cars didn't come until mid to late 60's.

[@honestone490]

Why use such ugly visuals to showcase these cars? I'd use a magazine ad before I'd show the actual car with bondo on the fender and torn seats.

[@saikumarkhan]

காலை வணக்கம் நண்பா 🙏🙏

[@jamesgudgeon4868]

In Australia the Ranchero Would be Called a Ute Or utility 3:57

[@wagonmaster1974]

Last Legendary Cars I will EVER click. Repetitive and WRONG! Not even the correct cars/years for the horrible commentary. Won't even go into engine sizes and pronunciation. Yeesh! How wrong can a video be??

[@NealDelettre]

The 56 "98" Olds convertible was my first car. Why was it selected for a video on 1960s cars? Da.

[@franklinhowell3370]

The 225 was bade car. I hade. One. And lot. Of. Woman. With. This car he don't. No what the. F he talking. About. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@iket.9930]

I had a 68 225, great car.

[@jimmywalker2693]

Again you don’t know your cars the red Pontiac is a Pontiac Catalina not a tempest cause we were a Pontiac dealer at this time and I drove a Catalina in tourquoise just like the red convertible you called a Tempest which is a Pontiac Catalina with probably a 389 cid engine just like I ordered in my Catalina and was fast a lightning too . I owned a tempest too and it looked nothing like the red Catalina you says was a Lemans. . being a dealers son , I have owned just about one of every car you tell bull about Back then you did not have to take a small engine . My father ordered nearly every car with larger engines nothing in basic but I never was able to put more than 3000 miles then it was sold for a demo and I got another . The only one I put 7000 miles on was a Bonneville with a 421 cid engine with two 4 barrel Rochester carbs and nothing could out run it since my family also still to this day own a drag strip here in Birmingham Alabama. I been into racing all my life and sponsored many winners of Talladega and Daytona In NASCAR .

[@charlesameyer1]

I’d be perfectly happy with a Barracuda with a slant 6. This wasn’t meant to be a muscle car. It was a fun cheap car like a base Mustang.

[@edblevins681]

This guy keeps repeating himself and really know what he's talking about 🙄

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@mbgrocott7115]

You repeat yourself way too much. Each review could be much more brief.

[@michelmendoza1769]

Did people NOT notice the Buick 225’s uncann resemblance to the Chevrolet Impala, Cadillac and Oldsmobile 98?

[@walterjay4806]

when he is ralking about the Pontiac Tempest LeMans it is showing a Pontia Catalina you can even read Catalina in the video!

[@KurtRiese]

This video sucks

[@henryhill3778]

AI waste of time...I clicked just to say this is is going to be BS.

[@Mike-q1z9w]

Length of vid bloated by repeating the same details over & over. Quit at 9mins.. Boring!.

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@joelkoosed902]

Repetitive and boring though out. Plus the 61 Cadillac shown was customized without mention of that fact; not sure why the announcer chose to focus on the base model Series 62, again without comment, or comparison to the deVille. Meh!

[@charlesameyer1]

I’d be perfectly happy with a Barracuda with a slant 6. This wasn’t meant to be a muscle car. It was a fun cheap car like a base Mustang. In fact, the only problematic car in this video is the Pontiac Tempest

[@johnl3230]

A bit repetitive 😅 this vid could of easily been 20 min.

[@luvr381]

*could've

[@richardrice8076]

And it still would've been too long. How long does it take to say every car of the sixties sucked?

[@glennholmes9587]

This guy must of been hit in the head "

[@glennholmes9587]

Who is this guy?

[@garymoon2829]

It's written by a computer: "artificial intelligence", aka: "A-I". All these videos are moronic, stupid, repetitive and pointless.

[@charlesosbun9381]

STOP repeating yourself!!!

[@wiiambarnarx8485]

It is " lamonze" not "lemans"! Why do you say in one sentence Lemans and not Lemans. It's pronounced "lamonze".