$14,000 Mac Pro vs $900 M1 Mac Mini - Video Editing Speed Comparison

[@Jonathan-wm5ju]

I use an Intel Core 9, with 64gb RAM Dell XPS17… and im starting to realize my real problem is actually Premiere Pro. Is clunky as hell.

[@gwm-btdbattlesagar.ioandmo9988]

use gpu encoding

[@erikfarid1314]

Maybe you are not cooling your System well enough, and it could also depend on which i9 you are using. There is one that is beefier, and the newer one which has less Cores. I personally switched to AMD long ago

[@gwm-btdbattlesagar.ioandmo9988]

Delete cashe files, update your drivers. Update your software.

[@vivekbharti3815]

Optimized Davinci Resolve 17.1 is available for M1 Macs and they perform surprising well, better than premiere pro.

[@hrinaldy]

could it handle fusion well?

[@c04-rhikbanerjee55]

Yes I used Da Vinci resolve 17 on a base model MacBook Air M1 and it was phenomenal 🔥

[@ravinchandra]

This is such a great news. I have shifted to Davinci Resolve & planning to buy a mac for all the non gaming stuff, having the MacBook Air M1 & M1 Mini in mind. I think I'll wait a bit more for the next M series of chips.

[@vivekbharti3815]

@@ravinchandra I don't think the next M1 successor chip would be as aggressively priced as this one. This costs less only because it's their very first product and a lot of companies and developers need to optimize their software for this processor. *This M1 costs less because they want you and companies to have a smooth transition to M1 chip. That's all.*

[@gamerknightlon8508]

@@hrinaldy maybe

[@hayzukreesto]

Be careful with your comparative percentages. If MP does a task in 50s and MM does it in 125s, then MP is 2.5X faster than MM. But that's not the same as 250% faster. It is 150% faster. If something is 100% faster, then it is double the speed. So 150% faster is double the speed, plus another 50% of the base (slower) speed.

[@haidara77]

An increase of 100% in a quantity means that the final amount is 200% of the initial amount (100% of initial + 100% of increase = 200% of initial). In other words, the quantity has doubled. so you are right

[@Yo-bx4bj]

Math

[@Bloodshade]

You need to also be sure that the % is based on the original variable, and there’s a technicality in your comment as well. If MP is 50s and MM is 125s, then you can say it took MM 2.5x longer, therefore it’s 1.5x slower compared to MP. If talking about one of them being faster, you’d say the MP finished in 40% of the time, therefore it’s 60% faster compared to MM.

[@haidara77]

@@Bloodshade your words are 110% correct my G

[@Bloodshade]

haider Safi I cringed when I heard the guy say 250% faster on the video. 100% faster would mean it took 0 seconds, so he’s time traveling apparently lol

[@dougscott188]

I have the M1 Mac Mini and been buying Macs for 30 years. This is hands down the best value price/performance Mac ever. Great times for Mac users.

[@lesgrant7861]

Same experience, I bought mine for $599 on Prime day. My I7 2011 Macbook Pro lasted 10 years and was still fast for it's age, but this Mac mini flys. I'm very happy with it :)

[@sidewinder3000]

Parker, I wish you’d tested with Final Cut Pro as well. Using Premiere in emulation doesn’t tell us much. Bad software running in emulation will of course be less than stellar. Everything you claim to be laggy on the M1 using Premiere would be vastly improved, or maybe completely fixed, if you were using FCP. My M1 MacBook Pro absolutely crushes 4k and 8k video from my Canon R5 in FCP, blowing the doors off my fully loaded 16” MBP with Intel inside.

[@matthazard]

Had exactly the same thought. Seems like apples and oranges until Adobe has native apps…

[@Josev-TV]

Totally agree. DaVinci resolve would have been good too.

[@QippysChannel]

Interesting, btw which mac book pro spec did you take, I'm seriously considering that or the mac mini, performance wise are they the same?

[@rodneymoore9183]

@@QippysChannel I’m on the 16” MBP with 32 gigs of ram and maxed out graphics and I will say the M1 macs are just way smoother. If you can wait, I would wait for a 16” M1 MacBook than spending the 3K-4K for the top intel one.

[@Theaaronchris]

M1 chips can playback footage from canon R5 using quicktime or vlc?

[@ArtyMars]

My gosh that wedding footage was incredible, far out 🙀

[@JVLombardi]

When comparing the Mini to the iMac, its not just the monitor that needs to be accounted for in the $700 price difference. Include keyboard, mouse, camera, speakers, and microphone. Yes, you could source these for less than $700.

[@80-80.]

If you are into video editing you need proper stutio monitors anyway, the built-in speakers in the iMac is usless for any creaive work. Use the microphone on your headset for video calls, or your shootgun mic. Everyone has a mouse. On top of that you still need a dock, card reader and stuff for your iMac. The iMac only makes sense for content consumers, not for content creators.

[@mrwhopee]

LOL no professional’s going to use the built in speakers on the iMac for mixing, nor will they care about the built in camera and microphone. and you can get a far nicer, larger, more colour accurate panel to work on which you can upgrade in the future, the whereas iMac you’re stuck with whatever Apple gives you and have to buy a whole new system. The mini has 10gig Ethernet option as well. Yeah you can use an external monitor with iMac but it won’t be a very clean looking setup (even a 2nd 24inch panel won’t match) and not everyone has room for 2 panels.

[@willoliver9960]

I agree, but I still think the Mini is the better deal because if the screen/speakers/webcam fails or you want an upgrade, it can be replaced without having the old broken or unused one still installed.

[@erikfarid1314]

No one who buys Apple should care about making a good Deal or spending less Money

[@wrackable]

No kidding a high end 54” monitor costs $200 lol

[@benjamin.kelley]

That shot with the waves in the background...dang. I need to shoot a wedding at a sweet location 😮

[@SHIFT-ED]

Would love to see this same video using Davinci Resolve. You forgot to mention one of the biggest benefits to the Mac mini, easily taking it with you anywhere, especially if you travel a lot.

[@SHIFT-ED]

When this video was done, my mac mini couldn’t even play my timeline and said it would take over 20 hours to render. After the new updates (Davinci Resolve) it plays the same project smooth and renders (with upscaling) in under 20 minutes.

[@biswajit07]

he did mention it...may be u skipped

[@FilmAshton]

I have heard that FCPX is better at handling footage than premiere, despite the computer specs.

[@vladimirtalijan]

FCP is 5 times faster than Premiere and have way better user interface and reliability.

[@chesswithsamrat1821]

True

[@77dris]

Yup, and Davinci Resolve is almost as fast as FCPX now. Premiere is the fat kid in the race, crossing the finish line last each and every time... usually tripping over it.

[@willy7968]

@@77dris which one is advisable to buy, I just started learning video editing… FCP or Davinci Resolve Studio, the prices are same, though I can’t consider Premiere Pro cos the subscription is not worth it for me, better still, can u suggest any video editing software for beginners

[@ABDTalk1]

@@vladimirtalijan disagree user interface iMovie 🤢🤢🤢

[@Mr__Sinister]

I went from a 2013 mac pro to a m1 mac mini, its sooooo good, I use I professionally for video and photo.

[@CandaceWilliamsVideo]

What are the specs for your Mac did you get the 8GB or 16GB

[@508GriM]

bought the 8gb ram Mac mini a month ago and I have edited two long form videos on it so far, utilizing Adobe dynamic link with After effects Keylight, and 4k footage. took about 1 hour to render a 24 minute video (Which normally goes on for about 5 hours on my iMac (without the dynamic link)) Totally recommend the Mac mini

[@Teluric2]

Video of you work please.? Have you ever wondered that not all 4k videos are heavy like raw and low bitrate? I would like to see that speed that you claim in a video showing the time counter.

[@KAZUNARl]

buying an apple computer and use premiere pro doesnt make much sense to me I‘d use final cut pro to take advantage of the apple power

[@davinphelps1863]

I’ve hear this before, is this true? I’ve only ever edited in Premier Pro on a Mac. I really don’t want to learn a whole new editing system and I really don’t want to leave the Apple eco system as everything I have is Apple. But if editing is really that much better maybe I should switch to Final Cut or Davinci?

[@KAZUNARl]

@@davinphelps1863 I would give it at least a try and if you don’t like it then you can still stick to what you’re used to… as far for picture editing there are not really good alternatives to adobe from apple… I still use photoshop and lightroom

[@gonzalonovoaphotography]

@@davinphelps1863 Final cut is very easy to get into

[@funmbi9876]

finally, someone giving actual editing information - thank you

[@XtremeGamingYT1]

This information is false. Premiere is not optimized for m1 yet

[@BarisYener]

@@XtremeGamingYT1 It is correct. Premire might be slower, but he also showed FCP. Whenever you color grade or use any effect on the footage and then edit, the problems will start. That is because the software needs a fast dedicated graphics card for that and the M1 Mini doesn't have one. Playing back a file is NOT editing. Even my DVD player can playback a movie!

[@IanEisenberg]

Just more proof that Premiere is garbage.

[@iamericlenz]

This is what I thought, too. 😅

[@XMGi00]

Yes.

[@ekphotography]

DITTO

[@SamEmilio2]

Right?? These are Premiere problems, not hardware problems

[@mt1990sweg]

It is much better on PC in my experience.

[@AnthonyBodanza]

I TOTALLY Agree with your suggestion to get the upgraded RAM. I edit everything on the new M1 Macbook Air. Granted, I am only working with Canon M50 footage, and some iphone 12 pro footage as well. It's PERFECT for newer creators on a lower budget who want a laptop that's portable but can still do some creative work. But I didn't upgrade my RAM and I very much regret it. If I'm exporting a project for KZbin, I can't work in photoshop without seriously lagging or increasing render time. But the render is still very fast for the price. But all that to say: upgrade your RAM from the 8GB

[@LuisGomes.]

11:55 beautiful video for your brother and his wife... Good video as always

[@Hathagu]

Bro I visit to your country please sponsor me for a trip and the visa

[@XMGi00]

Why use Premiere on an M1 Mac? Why use any Adobe software on any Mac these days? They’re so unoptimized that I can’t believe people still pay monthly for something that runs so poorly. 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@ltpinecone]

Davinci resolve is where it's at...adobe is losing it's grip on the video making space.

[@ravinchandra]

@@ltpinecone How does M1 handle Resolve, heard from some that it's good, but if you're using I would like to know your opinion.

[@professionalpotato4764]

It's just easier especially when you're with a team that also uses Adobe. It's another one of those ecosystem things. Sending files through Premiere, After Effects, Audition is pretty seamless. Editing photos from Lightroom to PS for thumbnails is great too. I'm not sure if Apple has a whole suite of software that just seamlessly works like that, never used FCP or any Apple software before. Cross platform compatibility is also important sometimes. Not everyone can run FCP projects, but everyone can open Adobe regardless of the OS. Question for Davinci users, why must BM be so annoying? I can't believe I actually have to buy copies of Resolve from physical stores. It's 2021. Is there really no online purchase available?

[@ltpinecone]

@@ravinchandra Im not using it. I am running on an AMD machine. the M1 chip does not have enough power for what I do. Mac's are expensive and not upgradable either.

[@arunashamal]

Amateur vs Pro..bro that is why! Amateurs can jump systems easily, when you are a pro and you have to work with other pro's and share files etc...Industry standards come in handy...

[@jasonpreziosi807]

Making proxies isn’t wasting time. It’s proper workflow. H.264 is for delivery not editing. That’s why you have an issue on both machines. You should have done some real tests like transcoding footage, round tripping files from Pr to AE, and performed some editing in a mezzanine codec.

[@sergioyichiong7269]

R5 outputs h264

[@ryanmoggin4311]

I forgot what I was watching for a min cause I was just watching the footage you had playing. These shots are crazy. The drone shots are elite

[@geraldbaria]

Shouod have made your Final Cut Pro editor do this video…waaay superior than any intel mac when using FCP on M1.

[@BarisYener]

Premire might be slower for the M1 Chip, but he also showed FCP. Whenever you color grade or use any effect on the footage and then edit, the problems will start.. That is because ANY software needs a fast dedicated graphics card for that and the M1 Mini doesn't have one. Playing back a file is NOT editing. Even my DVD player can playback a movie!

[@antofeeds5716]

I've never owned an apple computer and I believe 2021 will not end before I get one,,seems smooth when editing

[@glenelliott2620]

FCPX cuts through R5 and C70 HEVC footage like butter on the M1.

[@sergioyichiong7269]

prove it with a video ,

[@mt1990sweg]

I switched to PC early in 2020 and I use the M1 Mac Mini as a backup/travel solution. I have absolutely zero of those problems you're having with the $14k mac pro. I spent about $1500. I'm not trying to sound smug or hating on mac because I very much do enjoy the OS and so many things about the ecosystem, but dude, have you ever considered building an insane PC? I'm serious, I shoot and edit in raw, and never have to use proxies, have heavily graded footage with lots of effects/transitions. I don't know why more people don't do that. Also, Premier is FAR less buggy on PC. This isn't anything new I'm saying either. Most people know this.

[@WidescreenContent]

RAW isnt as hard on a machine as the newer compressed files, like he says at 4:28

[@wrackable]

Yup, my $3k Pc built 13 years ago still walks all over Mac.

[@sd961960]

@@wrackable Not M1 Max...it'll dust that PC in short order.

[@wrackable]

@@sd961960 I have a M1 max , it doesn’t. Might use less power but that’s not a issue for me. Doesn’t process faster nor is it capable of using half my apps natively.

[@sd961960]

@@wrackable Its a Pc...use native Apple apps on a Mac, and it smokes that dinosaur

[@filmfreek35]

Davinci Resolve would not struggle with 4K if media optimisation is set up right. I do however believe in spending the extra on computing choice for forward compatibility reasons. My 2014 MacBook Pro is still a true powerhouse because I paid for every possible upgrade Apple had to offer at the time of purchase. Thank you Parker. The MacBook Air is a possible consideration for in-studio tethering as a permanent station hooked to an external monitor. Congratulations to your brother and your sister in law 🥂💐

[@denniscarlson8696]

M1 shines in Final cut. I use it for my main work computer over a $3000+ custom built PC that i thought was super good until i started using my Mac mini.

[@tahamansoor599]

why don't u use windows machine built by yourself you can get same speed on half of the price, $5000 to $10k

[@cinemaipswich4636]

The only example I know of where the Mac Pro shines is in multiple Avid PCI cards used with Pro Tools Audio. Doing 6K or 12K video is still more economical using a WinPC. The big Mac Pro can deliver and edit the next project at the same time with ease. The Mini slows down, so much so, that scrubbing and editing is full of latency.

[@Clintonsodyssey]

Where did your "cinematic smartphone videio techniques" go Did you deleted it

[@thewrongopinion7811]

My 8Gb RAM M1 Mac Mini scrubs flawlessly through 4K footage from my C200 and my EOS R. But I edit in FCP.

[@nsen93]

Editing with proxy is the best way, every industry follows this process for offline editing. Proxy editing in NLE softwares ---> link it to original in resolve and take it for online.

[@FishingOD_OFFICIAL]

Haven’t even watched this yet but I’ve been waiting for a video like this before deciding what to pick up!

[@BrookeAlmond]

Nice vid!! Can always count on you 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼 Where is your beautiful MacBook case from?!?!?!

[@wonow7674]

Found it! fishskyn.com/collections/macbooks/products/camber-macbook

[@BrookeAlmond]

@@wonow7674 thanks so much! I spent so long looking for it last night! Legend 🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼

[@bradpaulp]

on "response to commands" at 7:00 (and generally whole test), i think it would be helpful to shoot video from a common good camera like a sony a7siii or eos r-series... and see how it performs. I don't think most people are buying a $5500 cinema camera body and then looking to use it on a $900 machine... I think a LOT of people though would get a $900 machine and use it for their mid-grade mirrorless cameras.

[@deusprogrammer_thekingofspace]

I have an M1 Mac Mini with only 8GB of RAM, and it renders video so much faster than my Windows PC. I don’t do huge videos, but a 3 minute 1080p video takes me less than a minute to export to mp4.

[@EleReyProductions]

Takes me 30 secs to export 4k on my PC you must have had a shitty PC. M1 is nice but don't compare it to PC because PC would wipe the floor with a few upgrades.

[@donnik7064]

@@EleReyProductions a german filmmaker did a detailled test. When it comes to exporting speed the M1 is not so Bad and comparable to PC. However, all uses during editing (playback, effects, fusion, Color grading) the msi creative is about twice to five Times faster than M1. Most interesting is that AI Performance is about 20 Times higher on PC.

[@Dreamdancer11]

@@EleReyProductions Pcs are fine the problem is that shitty os they run on called windows and their apps.Whats the point of having a monster that can drill a hole i the center of the earth if you have to run premiere and cubase on it....better have a nice streamlined quiet machine that ll run Final cut and Logix pro X on it like butter.

[@EleReyProductions]

@@Dreamdancer11 everyone complains about this but I haven’t ran into any problems. I have a i9 10900k 3080 to 64g ram 1tb nvme 2tb hard drive. 800 dollar monitor and to be honest I don’t have an issue with os

[@Dreamdancer11]

@@EleReyProductions Τhats great for you but you see we dont all wanna have a nuclear reactor on our desk,noisy,have to cool it with some liquid cooler and deal with a bulky box eating up space....and although we can go to smaller form factor solutions we still have to accept the fact that we should run windows and windows arent that efficient handling their resources and streamlined for a certain hardware.Iam not knocking it or anything but if there is a choice i would go with the os tailor made for the hardware anytime.

[@saqlaq96]

If the baseline M1s are this capable just imagine how crazy fast will be the M1X Mac Pros

[@buowerc]

No Apple silicon in Mac Pro until the very very end of the transition

[@Teluric2]

It depends whats crazy for you, youtuber moaning " insaneee" when they show only numbers not real videos running on screen will give you a wrong impresion As spare time editor working everyday with m1 and mbp 8 core i7 m1 is not that fast.

[@thequantaleaper]

Need an update with the M1 optimized Premiere and maybe even DaVinci Resolve. It's burning through footage remarkably well.

[@Maniac536]

No issues with video I just wish u had included the full specs of both systems in the video description still liking it

[@valdemarcaballero5298]

Next time try Resolve or Final cut..... software that runs natively on both machines respectively. This is NOT fair

[@sixtarsgld5969]

That color grade is on another level

[@Spaceraypro]

Great vid, but it would be more relevant to compare the performance with the Premiere beta which is optimized for M1 or DaVinci Resolve / FCPX

[@JackieChinJR]

Are you running using x64 PP on Rosetta 2 or or native ARM PP Beta? Either way it isn’t a fair comparison. You would have harvested more of M1’s performance using FCPX especially when it comes to rendering.

[@alzyde]

great work as usual.

[@Rock.ashish.raj_]

kzbin.info/door/KrrUpDmL9UJ-GAwaEQefUQ

[@applewaffles4781]

i still think people misunderstand the point of the M1 chip, is not meant to edit on an 8k Red Camera or 6 BMD Pocket Cinema Camera, is meant for DSLR or iPhone footage, because it's an entry level computer that happens to have pro level single core performance, it can edit 4k and even 8k footage sure, but it's not meant for it, my MBP has problems with 1080p60 Nikon footage, still works fine, just not too smoothly (i use FCPX and DaVinci Resolve)

[@j.gverse6344]

I totally called it when I thought the couple footage looked like they were at the LDS Hawaii temple! Great video.

[@filmmakershome694]

I edit on my mac mini with i7. I work not only on my KZbin channel but all other professional projects. The important thing is that the old mac mini (not M1) has an option of using an external GPU and with that, my little mac is a real monster :) I work with 4K and big projects with no problem.

[@EdwardYusupov]

Why u don’t use Final Cut Pro on Apple? Adobe works not so good on apple (not like on windows).

[@nocode1]

While aren’t you using Final Cut Pro for your Mac? Surely using Adobe is like using Android for iphone 🤔

[@TaylorMoore4K]

Far more interested in FCP since the optimizations on it take far more advantage of the M1 chip. Good to see premiere performance though! Thanks dude.

[@RockyColaFizz]

This is a nice video. I literally have the Exact same MacPro spec'd computer, and a 16GB M1 Mac mini. I don't use Premier Pro because well....... I like more modern NLE's. Anyways, The M1 smokes the MacPro in Resolve and FCPX with Canon R5 10 bit 422 footage. It is super smooth with that codec compared to the MacPro. In Final Cut, the MacPro actually handles the R5 10 bit 422 footage quite well. But its not as smooth as the M1 Mini. For everything else, including BMPCC 6k Raw, and Canon C70 footage, and any other 8 bit, or 10 bit 420 footage the MacPro is faster, by about 30 percent typically. BMPCC 6k Raw in Resolve on the MacPro is just smooth period. It struggles a bit on the M1. Where you REALLY notice the MacPro's power is when adding effects, or using Noise Reduction. Noise Reduction especially, is monumentally better in FCPX or Resolve with the MacPro. Fusion effects in Resolve are much zippier and faster on the MacPro as well. Bottom line, if I have a simple 10bit 422 edit, I use the M1. For everything else, the MacPro is faster, smoother and handles effects and color grade layers much better. It also renders quite a bit faster in almost all scenarios. But it also costs about 10X as much. The M1 truly is an amazing deal.

[@markr041]

This post is a lot more valuable than the video, which just uses one software that is not optimized on one of the computers and compares limited tasks.

[@BlenderGamerFreaq]

I wonder if some of the issues you experience with with Mac mini will be solved as soon as the software is optimized for the M1.

[@FunGuyPhotography]

good to know that M1 Mini can hold its own, defiantly looking for an upgrade.

[@ltpinecone]

Anything but a mac. Go for a higher end AMD rig.

[@thedvguy]

If you scrub using the numbers just under the left corner of your preview, it will scrub smoothly.

[@PaulMoldovan]

Have your tried Premiere Beta for M1? it works way better than the regular Premiere version

[@MichaelDaviesMusic]

Compared to spending $899 on building your own Windows PC, with a Ryzen cpu and pretty awesome graphics card would blow away the Mac Mini M1

[@JaymesMedia]

Love my Mac Mini. It handles H.265 files very well without proxies or optimized media in Davinci Resolve. I haven’t had to optimized in media in months. Also no in Davinci with color grading

[@wrighty338]

what about the same comparison in FCPX and Davinci?

[@nipun_surnilla]

I love my M1 Macbook pro its a beast!

[@CNMTCFilms]

I think when comparing it to the M1 iMac it's important to note that it has a 24" *4.5k* Display! You cannot find that anywhere else, so you'd have to downgrade when choosing the Mac mini + an external monitor

[@shzammpatapon9865]

but these days are not like old times anymore, there are new monitors that are gonna have the new mini led monitor that support hdr like the pro display.

[@TrentErwin]

Try the beta version of Premiere on your M1 Macs. It runs very smooth on my little 13in M1 Macbook Pro with only 8GB of ram. And I was also editing Canon R5 footage without running proxies, which I almost always have to do no matter which Mac machine I edit on. People who complain about Premiere Pro all the time seriously must not know how to use it. Final Cut works and feels like the most amateur program. I can't stand trying to do things to finalize/polish a project that I can in Premiere in a matter of minutes. Final Cut is only good for slicing up footage, basic sound design, and basic effects. When it comes to any text or animation (which I do a lot for my corporate clients), it literally can't keep up with Premiere.

[@mohammedzaid5989]

Isn't motion there for effects and transitions? It's so easy to setup an effect in motion and get it to FCPX!

[@blimages2]

Good morning ! which iMac i could use with 6k blackmagic camera including Atem Mini Pro ISO, if you can help me with the details, thanks

[@jackdiao4576]

You got your speed comparison math wrong. 4 sec is 150% faster than 10 sec, same with 50 sec and 125 sec. You got the 60% faster for 75 sec vs 125 sec though.

[@ShahtiaAshvinOfficial]

Do Mac mini support Kontakt Native Instrument music software?

[@Ripitupfilms]

Mac mini is a game changer for anyone who edits videos!

[@uribak9144]

Don't make me laugh, you probably did not work on a workstation that has a professional NVIDIA card.

[@jimengab]

All these quirks will be gone once Adobe Releases the ARM version of premiere. Final Cut already destroys the crappy optimization of premiere on both Intel and ARM and with optimizations the M1 will be really similar to the performance of the Pro for a fraction of the price.

[@linuxlounge]

This isn’t really a fair comparison unless you’re hellbent on using Premiere Pro, Premiere isn’t yet optimised for ARM so of course it doesn’t perform well, it should perform much better once Adobe updates it

[@ANGERINSIDE]

Definitely like your Mac videos. I don’t really come for the information cause that I learn on my own but I can sure appreciate good video editing and yours is one of my favorites when it comes to Mac reviews and comparisons so I always come back just to watch and enjoy a good video

[@digitalemotionfilms]

Parker Walberg why would one put a radio mic in the shot when you can hide the mic out of shot when using a Senheiser. Just use a shotgun ?? Also just worth mentioning the C70 is not much of a camera to review codec wise. Why not just review this machine while working with 8K footage shot on a Red or use 400 Mbit footage shot on a Panasonic or Sony. That will make more sense. But a C70..... Canon makes bad codecs, so using a Canon for the review makes it a bit skewered to start with

[@TheRealMafoo]

I love the M1 Mac, however, these machines are purpose built for video editing. The CPU has special hardware that makes these tasks ultra fast. As a general use computer, it makes an amazing laptop, due to it's power consumption. As a small form factor desktop, you can get smaller, more performant, windows machines, if video editing is not part of your workflow.

[@Stupid33]

B- B-But it’s apple

[@AnthonyWrightFilms]

Wild Walbeck, are you gonna compare your Mac Pro to the new Macbook Pros that dropped last month?

[@horasisprod1806]

Thanks guys!!

[@adamripperdan]

Wow...I thought the review was great and on point...then you added the sliver of video of the wedding...all I can say honestly is...mind blown. Really good clip!

[@hjnoelmedia]

Sorry bro i used to love your contain but my problem is I use Final Cut Pro and da Vinci resolve but you guys use premiere Pro and all the software I hate please do some Final Cut Pro videos

[@philip_arvind]

Something being two and a half times faster isn‘t „250% faster“, it‘s just „150% faster“!

[@YawasiAdam]

yup absolutely...haha

[@bk_deltor9155]

2000 x 2.5 = 5000 2000 x 1.5 = 3000 2000 x 1.5 = 3000 +2000 = 5000 2000 x .5 = 1000 +2000 = 3000

[@skinnyman1ua]

@@bk_deltor9155 Convert 10% to a decimal by removing the percent sign and dividing by 100: 10/100 = 0.10. 10 seconds vs 4 seconds. 10 seconds = 100% ; 1 second = 10% ; 2 seconds = 20% ; 3 seconds = 30% ; 4 seconds = 40% . 100% - 40% = 60%. Mac pro is 60% faster. Now comes apple math: 1s = 25% ; 2s= 50% ; 4s = 100% ; 6s = 150% ; 8s = 250% ; 10s = 350 fucking % ; How come? No-one knows, but it's fucking amazing and innovative!

[@utubekullanicisi]

@@skinnyman1ua Tf does that have anything to do with Apple and “Apple math”? Seems like a cheap way to throw shade at Apple lol.

[@PresidentEvil]

imagine the Mac Pro with a 100 core M2 chips

[@ryanhinmanfilms]

Native update just released. Premiere is fully native now.

[@AustinW_1]

The footage you shot is beautiful.

[@TWARDOWSKY.]

why no testing on Finaul Cut its running native on M1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????????

[@johnthevideoguy]

Great video! I was curious about how the Mac mini is. Now I have a better idea. Thanks!

[@mali_astronaut]

I use the M1 mac mini with 8gb of ram and it runs great in DaVinci Resolve. Premiere pro works fine unless you use h.265 HEVC files. It just won't play them, while resolve plays everything smoothly. It's obviously optimisation issues and I hope it will be better with new updates, as a lot of people use Adobe software.

[@DebzLife]

Gosh that text motion graphic and the audio.. is crisp af

[@EliezYT]

I have been a Windows user for my Pc all my life and for everything else I’ve used Apple and for be personally my laptop sucks and I don’t really like Windows anymore after leaving Windows 7 to 10 and then to 11 and I’ve been looking for a new Pc and honestly fully going into the Apple ecosystem and honestly I think I might cave and if you want my specs for my laptop it’s a 16gb i3-8145 with 1tb hdd do you think I should switch and should I get the 8gb or 16gb because I know the ram is not the same as on the intel’s and I’m a KZbinr looking for a great gaming and editing so what do you think?

[@TheOneSaskatchewanFarmBoy]

Yesterday I bought a MacBook Air M1. Already love it

[@engorgioarmani3381]

Those biceps are gorgeous!

[@woeliemedia3691]

Cool compare... Premiere has allready a beta version that works better then the last version for the M1... Hope the build will be out soon...

[@LeeandroNoray]

So premier = spending thousands on equipment just to get it to run smoothly? FCP wont kill you to learn it.

[@LordsofMedia]

FCP doesn't come with a full creative suite.

[@froznfire9531]

But its FCP, just like Resolve its a nice standalone program but isnt as easy as a whole suite

[@LeeandroNoray]

@@froznfire9531 I'm a professional videographer and photographer, I don't use any Adobe products so that's just excuses, FTP, Capture one and affinity for images etc and never looked back.

[@froznfire9531]

@@LeeandroNoray I'd rather use one suite instead of 4 different programs which takes much longer. But if u adapted to it, nice 👍

[@LeeandroNoray]

@@froznfire9531 think about how much you save, if Final Cut is better why would I stay with premier just for photoshop or AE.

[@charltonium4083]

Now that the Mac Studio has been announced, do you plan to get one of those for your studio? And if so, will you plan to do a review on it?

[@LORENZOMILIND]

I love all mac products, but i use windows to edit my footage. Pc's are just more powerful

[@strivold4922]

PCs are way more powerful than tablets and phones for sure. A Mac is a PC

[@MiKEJaY]

@@strivold4922 In the strictest definition, a Mac is a PC because PC stands for personal computer. However, in everyday use, the term PC typically refers to a computer running the Windows operating system, not the operating system made by Apple

[@strivold4922]

@@MiKEJaY Well in your world. That doesn't make it more true for all that. Even more so with Linux/phones/tablets. Even Steve Jobs and Apple communications called them PCs until the stupid 2000' marketing to "make it different" If you want to speak about Windows say Windows instead of PC or it will bring confusion to a lot of people

[@LORENZOMILIND]

@@strivold4922 u don't have to get mad bro

[@akis9252]

@@strivold4922 iSheep triggered 😂

[@himynameisryan]

Final cut on my m1 air is crazy. I edit 5 layers of 4K but this thing (base model) slices through it like butter I switched to Mac because of final cut and it was so worth getting this MacBook (even the base model)

[@MotherDaughterDate]

Would FCPX work better than PP? more compatible

[@thisismalindu]

Love the video, but I have to say this is some weird comparison considering that the Mac Pro is priced 10 times the Mac Mini. 😅

[@thisismalindu]

@@fulltimefilmmaker 😅😅 I Love your videos though. Learned so much 🔥

[@powellfilmmaking]

Great video Parker!

[@onegreenev]

Disappointed that the MacBook Pro M1 and the Mini and iMac don't come with up to 64g of ram. I love my M1 MacBook Pro but damn, the ram limit is just way to low for what people do with their portable computers.

[@onegreenev]

I would like support for external GPU's

[@50450720]

I'd love to see how these machines work with prores HQ and prores raw files in fcpx, that would be a far more realistic challenge as people don't usually buy apple products to run Adobe software. That's like buying a petrol car and running it on diesel. And people who shoot 8k footage professionaly are far more likely to have the budget for a mac studio machine.

[@andreaslange2649]

After dozens of YT-vids about M1 Macs (always with performance tests), I feel like knowing a lot about video editing... In fact, the only thing I really do concerning video is pausing Netflix when going to the fridge.

[@lesterbeats7108]

how about just using Mac mini for insta360 video? and Phone cam? i think mac mini is Just enough?

[@drcringe7873]

What camera did you use to shoot that weddingfootage?

[@gypsycat619]

So this will apply as well to DAWS like Logic Pro?

[@sadlover8146]

how can i work for you guys,trying to make and be a cinematic videomaker to!

[@devonleblanc9152]

Why use premiere? lag that bad, count me out.