Churchill: "We shall never surrender" Germany: And I took that personally
@尺几-u1r3 жыл бұрын
😂
@Konmonachi3 жыл бұрын
Pretty much
@trencidarko72713 жыл бұрын
STOP COPIEING MY NAME!!!!😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠
@arstotzkaninspector11613 жыл бұрын
@@trencidarko7271 you have problems
@mrcool21073 жыл бұрын
@@trencidarko7271 what is your name . Kid
@f18cowboy506 жыл бұрын
I didn't know Siri was so knowledgeable of WWII history.
@thetruthaboutfacts2246 жыл бұрын
LOL
@hanscherokeelaoluntok88035 жыл бұрын
literally just say "Simon says dadada" siri would say it
@MrTimydjun5 жыл бұрын
В нас своя история..у Сири и ...кого то своя.
@jimsuniverse49545 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@Edgymemer5 жыл бұрын
XD
@Britton_Thompson5 жыл бұрын
[13:21] *"Japan had no interest in Siberia as it is an endless forest full of bears."* Now that's the pertinent analysis they just don't give you over on the History Channel!
@AbdulRasyidPangrango-qr9dt4 жыл бұрын
bro siberia have a lot of Oil, that is a importend resoruces for japan since USA stop export Oil to Japan
@afdhalulakbar53824 жыл бұрын
@@AbdulRasyidPangrango-qr9dt yeah and full of endless forest,bear,and their army aren't that strong (weak)
@AbdulRasyidPangrango-qr9dt4 жыл бұрын
@@afdhalulakbar5382 bro.. soviet win WW2 again german in Eropea. But soviet still habe 40% manpower in far east, they are not that weak
@ReclaimTheMainland4 жыл бұрын
@@AbdulRasyidPangrango-qr9dt dude the entirety of the Allies especially the US gave USSR 1billion USD and tonnes of natural rwsources and supply to keep them alive.
@AbdulRasyidPangrango-qr9dt4 жыл бұрын
@@ReclaimTheMainland what do you espect to the country that just trought Starving, WW1, Two revolution in 1 years, Civil Wars, military Officer purge, and WW2? After all Soviet pay it back after wars. If soviet having long peace and not surronded by enemy like USa, of course they dont need it
@Jaydog113 жыл бұрын
Girls: OMG let’s do girls vs boys Boys: Naz!s vs Soviets
@jeremiatampubolon61493 жыл бұрын
Jajajaja ilegal with the full name BULLSHIT
@Inside_SEC3 жыл бұрын
Naz¡s VS Soviets
@Hsp-hr2hn3 жыл бұрын
@pepsi man dont forget Capitalist pigs
@therealtruth4603 жыл бұрын
@Wehrmacht nazi deutschland Based 😎
@akuganteng7903 жыл бұрын
@@jeremiatampubolon6149 haha gblk para cewek2 selalu membandingkan cowok vs cewek haha
@Pandadude-eg9li5 жыл бұрын
Fun fact, that August 5 1941 attack was Hitler's first attempt to encircle the Kiev pocket, but his generals not only didn't commit to it, but many actually opposed the idea.
@lizzyregis4 жыл бұрын
At that point many high ranking German officers started realizing that the 'cauldron' tactics used to encircle so many Soviet divisions in Kiev, Brest-Litovsk, and Smolensk were actually slowing down German Infantry to the point where the encirclements weren't even worth it, sometimes German divisions would let the Soviets break out of their pockets to rejoin the frontlines simply because it was taking so much time to reorganize and continue their advance.
@nope71202 жыл бұрын
Not just the Generals,not even Hitler himself was sure if he really wants to delay caputing Moskow with that.(Since they had to divert Army Group Centre's tanks for the northern spearhead)He wait 19 crucial days to make the final Order
@The_Honcho2 жыл бұрын
I think the “madman who caused the defeat” narrative is incredibly overblown. There was a lot of times Hitler’s personal orders saved lives, or caused great victories. He may have made a few blunders, but he had far more successes’ over failures.
@idreeskhan8885 Жыл бұрын
@@lizzyregis I mean isnt the whole idea to circle them to take them out of the war? Turn them into prisoners or just kill them?
@johnpiscitello6204 Жыл бұрын
Oftentimes they try to outflank them then cut their supply lines off typical wartime strategy
@giovannigavassino10475 жыл бұрын
1 vs 1 would have been a no-contest. It took 3/4 of the whole world to take Germany down.
@giovannigavassino10475 жыл бұрын
@@ajaibsidhu6226 I do agree with your points, would be a fierce fight till the very end. Nonetheless, considering German's army was spread out on two major fronts and occupied countries, USSR had a massive lendlease of equipment with the best technology from the Allies, I still think they could pull it off, even in a war of attrition. There is a reason while almost all historians believe Germany lost the war because of the two fronts opened. Still, I do agree that it would be a very bloody war, with no real winners due to incredibly high losses. Indeed I highly respect Russian army and their efforts.
5 жыл бұрын
@@ajaibsidhu6226 dont forgot allies lend
@chipshero76915 жыл бұрын
@ lend lease indeed
@obamagamingg82065 жыл бұрын
The Soviets had a lot larger industry so they could just outproduce Germany by itself
5 жыл бұрын
@@obamagamingg8206 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦♂️🤦♂️tell me why then you got the biggest lend in history and free materails for building tanks and thinks like that. Why 3/4 world had the difficulty to destroy germany🤣🤣🤣. Stop soviet propaganda and learn history
@icantcomeupwithagoodusername244 жыл бұрын
USA had no problem selling weapons to anyone willing to pay for them 😂🤣😂🤣
@aaanjaaa4 жыл бұрын
Nothing wong i can feel it
@icantcomeupwithagoodusername244 жыл бұрын
@@aaanjaaa feel*
@Jo-li2bi4 жыл бұрын
What's so funny?
@SoDN.4 жыл бұрын
@@Jo-li2bi well because USA let every country to buy their weapon cuz you know USA need money
@dannyturkian90834 жыл бұрын
explain the lend lease
@theharoox80665 жыл бұрын
Nazi germany vs soviets alone 1/3 video is about what happened with UK and japan
@Irgendwelche55 жыл бұрын
Ahh.. Because its important...?
@nekostyan19755 жыл бұрын
@@Irgendwelche5 nah
@kartupelitish19035 жыл бұрын
But still great
@BoundInChains5 жыл бұрын
Historicism man.
@nstice15 жыл бұрын
Relevant
@ancap17035 жыл бұрын
That would make a good hoi4 mod
@hiddeboland45075 жыл бұрын
Huntet Hunter there is one, its named war in the east
@ricardomilos55725 жыл бұрын
So who win
@dcross36415 жыл бұрын
Sovimany
@mauricekeip63035 жыл бұрын
Yes, but that's really it. The Video is Bullshit.
@squirrelystew83235 жыл бұрын
Hidde Boland “DREW DURNIL!!!”
@erichkaufmann52845 жыл бұрын
Even as a Russian, I believe if it was a 1v1 we would have lost.
@jeanop37004 жыл бұрын
Winter:am i a joke to u
@sanborn20104 жыл бұрын
You are not a Russian
@erichkaufmann52844 жыл бұрын
Joseph Stalin we don’t have to lose as many soldiers as we did, the Americans captured the first German city in WW2. The city of Aachen fell to the Americans and was the first German city to fall in WW2, mainly because the Americans used small groups of men clustered on the battlefield. Germans that fought in Aachen said it was the most unpredictable things the Americans did, that caught them off guard. Also if you look into it RAF and American bombers destroyed the majority of German factories, and industry and economy. Also note that T-34 tanks where actually built on American machinery, and factories built by American contractors brought in during the late 30’s by Stalin, not many people know that.
@erichkaufmann52844 жыл бұрын
Joseph Stalin We also used a lot of British Aircraft, also before we invaded Berlin we had the Americans bomb Berlin the night before. Certainly we did are part against the Germans, but we used everything we had while they still had men on the western front and in Africa Italy etc etc. The Germans lost millions and millions less men than we did, because their Generals where the greatest on earth, their pilots like Erich Hartmann shot down 352 Soviet aircraft alone and was the top ace. Also for every panzer lost, 70 T-34’s where lost. In a pure 1v1 Germany would have won, the Soviet Union depended on American money British aircraft and other American goods even top Soviet generals admitted to that in the 50’s after the war.
@erichkaufmann52844 жыл бұрын
Joseph Stalin it’s also insane to think France and Britain wanted to attack the Soviet Union right after the war and although I dislike Americans, they where the only ones that respected are hard fight and disagreed because Churchill was a mad man by 1945
@ultimateloservino3 жыл бұрын
“If your losing a battle, throw more men in it” -Stalin Maybe.
@sooryan_10182 жыл бұрын
That explains why the Germans used kids and teenagers in the battle of Berlin lmao
@joekaputt44152 жыл бұрын
if you see a panzer send 500 men to die against it to destroy it -Joseph Stalin
@sooryan_10182 жыл бұрын
@@joekaputt4415 I never said nunna this shit - George Washington
@christopherchartier30172 ай бұрын
@@sooryan_1018”Wtf is all this shit?” -Sun Tsu in 2024, probably
@jamesvoller167Ай бұрын
No. It was Douglas Haig that said that. Or at least thought it
@jagerbataillon38475 жыл бұрын
But we are both alcoholics, why should we fight?
@user-vy2hv5pp7k5 жыл бұрын
We should learn from our mistakes, unite and liberate west from zionist terrorists in power.
@badland1535 жыл бұрын
@@user-vy2hv5pp7k ✌👌
@FirozKhan-tl5os4 жыл бұрын
For money power
@user-vy2hv5pp7k4 жыл бұрын
@@deVeresd.Kfz.1515 It was not Stalin's fault, you do not understand. He was a God's scourge against Bolshevik terror. His purges in 30s eliminated almost all original Jewish Bolsheviks. He was a ruthless leader but he was necessary for Russia to survive.
@aerocu4824 жыл бұрын
Kevin DeVere Damn right
@Snaut16 жыл бұрын
"Slowly return to democracy." That only happened to Franco's Spain because it was pressured geopolitically from all sides by EU/NATO, with a new and solid Fascist bloc in Europe democratisation wouldn't have happened after Hitler's death - not even after attempts at gradual subversion. Germany could have at least carved out Byelorussia as a satellite out of the USSR as well., otherwise fantastic video.
@danielgcos48826 жыл бұрын
In Spain we returned to democracy when Franco died, we signed the Marshall plan and thus we were not touched (idk what would have happened in this other reality)
@danielgcos48826 жыл бұрын
actually nvm, I had not finished the video and didn't understand the context of what you were saying
@TheCrimsonS4ge6 жыл бұрын
daniel Gcos fascism only thrived because the people of germany were poor and desperate and angry following the First World War and the treaty of Versailles, this chaos and turmoil in German politics is what drove people to ideological extremes such as fascism. Now that Germany have won and the anger of the people have been satisfied, there is no reason for Germany to go to war again. And with this low war support it would be incredibly difficult for the nazi’s extremist popularism to survive. Ultimately Germany would have to descend into moderatism.
@oceanhome20236 жыл бұрын
Facist regimes don’t last very long look how long it took Russia to get rid of communism
@Pilum10005 жыл бұрын
I would say - here neo-Nazis masturbate tirelessly to their sick fantasies :>
@antred115 жыл бұрын
6:22 After what the Soviets did to Finland in 1939 / 1940, Finland would definitely have joined the Germans, anyway.
@CborgMega5 жыл бұрын
Same with Romania, after the Soviet invasion of the Romanian Eastern province of Bessarabia. [later edit] Not to mention that Romania had the oil that German panzers needed so badly (at least until the German conquest of the Russian-controlled oil fields in Caucasus).
@neptunefog60825 жыл бұрын
Finland was russian empire, and soviets gave ir independence in 1917, you dumb fool. Nothing was done to finland in 39
@gabriel.b90365 жыл бұрын
@@neptunefog6082 Are you autistic in 1939 the Soviets bombed Helsinki and invaded without any justification.
@antred115 жыл бұрын
@@neptunefog6082 Yeah, absolutely nothing ... except invading it and then stealing a large piece of its land, YOU DOLT.
@neptunefog60825 жыл бұрын
antred11 Finland was part of the Russian empire before 1917, so ussr did not “steal” anything. In 1917 Lenin signed finland’s “application” or declaration on independence and soviet russia acknowledged finland independency ( first country to do so). From 1917 till 1922 , during ww1 and ussr civil war at the weakest moment for the russian country, finland used the moment and was the aggressor , started a war and occupied lands of russia ( ussr) that had never been part of Finnish Duchy ( part of Russian empire) in belief of so called Great Finland by the finnish nationalists. In 1938 ussr had secret negotiations with finland, supposing that germany plans an attack on ussr, ussr suggested a pact with finland : in case nazis attack finland, that finland does not join the nazis and does not let the nazis onto finish territory while ussr supports finland to fight the nazis off. Finland refused the pact. Then ussr suggested an exchange: finland gives to ussr key territories for ussr border protection in exchange for karelia that Finland wanted. Finland refused again, even though there was no sense it that refusal. Finland refuses all other reasonable suggestions not to facilitate nazis attack on ussr. Finland left no choice to ussr. In 1939 Ussr had to move the borderline with this traitor country as far as possible before ww2. Finland was land-hungry, that’s all, and took the convenient side in ww2. They also were anti-Russian, since they always had territorial claims on russia/ussr. Finland wanted russian lands, this is why they sell themselves to nazis. Soviets did not commit any war crimes in Finland. Finland on the contrary took part in 1941-1942 leningrad blockade to starve people to death which is a war crime.... You know only the convenient part of history, you are brainwashed like most westerners
@Leliel0024 жыл бұрын
11:45 I tought it was one of those bad advertisement for an android game or something
@slixkbaxk43165 жыл бұрын
No allies for the Soviets *Winter has joined the server*
@gammaao5 жыл бұрын
Winter: Allow us to introduce ourselves
@CatWachristmashat5 жыл бұрын
winter: i got you fam
@customerservice13235 жыл бұрын
To be honest if Nazi Germany and Soviets fought eachother alone and the winter wasn't there for Soviets, there's a chance Nazi Germany could've won that war...
@reptiloidx89425 жыл бұрын
YE ALL TALK ABOUT THE NUMBERS OF DEAD LIKE YE ALL BEEN THERE SEEN EVERY THING AND COUNTED AND DOCUMENTED . EVERY 10th YEAR NUMBERS KEEP CHANGING LOWER HIGHER AND LOWER AGAIN . SO WHY DO WE ALL BELIEVE IN HISTORIANS EXPERTS AND ARCHIVE ?????
@simpleandawesomeanime32205 жыл бұрын
@@reptiloidx8942 the weather does change but the change isn't significant. Since it still goes Below freezing.
@FreedomAtLast8456 жыл бұрын
My biggest enemy: WINTER
@angelikaunger62765 жыл бұрын
Just copy this name and your god Deutsche Brüderschaft
@leclerc39155 жыл бұрын
No it’s not, it’s lack of supplies, oil and manpower
@МахалЫваныч-и5и5 жыл бұрын
GSG Deutschland Come, we will give you teeth again and break as our grandfathers did. For hundreds of years you went to us with your sword. And now you have migrants
@finnishwehraboo83775 жыл бұрын
BIGGER ENEMY FINNISH WINTER MUHAHAHAHA
@-v-95485 жыл бұрын
So ist es... Immer genug Sauerkraut essen... Es gibt dir Kraft
@turtlebeta19775 жыл бұрын
Girls locker : ew I hate P.E omg what is that Boys locker :
@pagaun4 жыл бұрын
At the end of the video you said that USA, germany, and USSR test their atomic bombs. How the USSR test their atomic bomb if they were invaded, then they were split, then a civil war, and then internal divisions. I think its not possible. The cold war will be between USA and Germany.
@bruhlel66744 жыл бұрын
Yeah in that alternate timeline russia devestate so much
@tomasdetorquemada64993 жыл бұрын
and by the way either soviet union or the US wouldn’t have the material or the Knowledge for creating that bomb. (There are some books about the German atomic facilities at Jonastal. Still a restricted area). But the Germans wouldn’t have „heavy water“ from Norwegian factory. Uran would be found at Kongo, but that’s an British colony. Will they sell?
@tomasdetorquemada64993 жыл бұрын
@G E T R E K T 905 You should ask Pagaun G, he wrote about that.
@Mr000ELS3 жыл бұрын
China could develop atomic bombs even before being an economic power, ae goes with North Korea. U can argue they had soviet support, but I think they would have gotten it sooner or later anyway
@pierren___10 ай бұрын
Civil wars can reinforce countries, especially the army
@이동연-c6d6 жыл бұрын
Finally! you release the new video! I’ve waited for this video was released for months.
@stainlesssteelruler1435 жыл бұрын
I havent started it yet but i feel like the third reich will conqure russia.
@carstenrenekjrulff62722 жыл бұрын
What I do like about this video. Is that it takes in consideration that "an army cannot fight with boots and guns only. It needs food too." And even with the stretched supply lines Germany would have far less problems with keeping their armies supplied. And Stalin did consider peace talks until late 1942. And had been willing to give up the Baltics, Belorussia and Ukraine for a peace between Germany and the USSR.
@idreeskhan8885 Жыл бұрын
Hitler was so stupid not to take this. Thats an insane amount of resources if Hitler just accepted that. Ukraine is particular is the breadbasket of Europe and theres plenty of oil there too.
@JuergenGDB Жыл бұрын
@@nemanjajovanovic8295 Pretty sure Ukraine and the Baltics would have been enough if you look at the line he drew across the map. Sure no Caucuses region but the best land is truly the Ukraine and the Baltics. Hell Russia stole the Baltics and Ukraine anyways, it just changes hands. Hell, had the German Army gone into Ukraine as liberators they would have had a working and dedicated populace with full support against the Russians. This alone would of freed up at least 75K 2nd line troops from Partisan duty.
@RoCK3rAD Жыл бұрын
@@JuergenGDByou can’t go in as liberators if you see the people as less than animals. Mustache guy still should’ve taken it
@randomguy6289 Жыл бұрын
No? Stalin would never consider peace, because this war was not just a conflict for land and resources, but an extermination war. If USSR surrendered, tens of million would be executed
@snapdragonzoroark Жыл бұрын
@@RoCK3rADhe could've came up with some bs like the Ukrainians are honorable Aryans or the Ukraine was the real Russia "kievan rus"
@infoprod77312 жыл бұрын
14:28 What really helped the USSR weren't the things they used for fighting, but things that help fighting, like spare parts of a vehicle, food, etc. Stalin and Zhukov both admitted that without Lend lease it would have been difficult if not impossible to win.
@ruka32192 жыл бұрын
The lend lease represented around 3 percent of the soviet material, and the american tanks were really crappy. The americans contributed mostly with jeeps, nothing too important.
@infoprod77312 жыл бұрын
@@ruka3219 americans contributed in places like food, among other things. Sherman M4s were quite popular among soviet tankers because they were more reliable and refined. their guns were weak but they have the IS-2 for that, who cares American planes were used often, and Valentine light tanks were used inn place of crappy T-60
@infoprod77312 жыл бұрын
@@ruka3219 zhukov admitted that without the lend lease it would have been much difficult if not impossible to win the war.
@gaminglichgamer40352 жыл бұрын
@@ruka3219 Tldr at at the bottom "I want to tell you what, from the Russian point of view, the president and the United States have done for victory in this war, the most important things in this war are the machines.... The United States is a country of machines. Without the machines we received through Lend-Lease, we would have lost the war." That is what Joseph Stalin said about American lend lease. Hell even Nikita Khrushchev confirmed that Stalin expressed those views. "If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war, one-on-one against Hitler's Germany, we would not have withstood its onslaught and would have lost the war. No one talks about this officially, and Stalin never, I think, left any written traces of his opinion, but I can say that he expressed this view several times in conversations with me." According to an essay for RFE/RL's Russian service by Boris Sokolov "In a hypothetical battle one-on-one between the U.S.S.R and Germany, without the help of Lend-Lease and without the diversion of significant forces of the Luftwaffe and the German Navy and the diversion of more than one-quarter of its land forces in the fight against Britain and the United States, Stalin could hardly have beaten Hitler, it should be remembered that during World War I, the transportation crisis in Russia in 1916-17 that did a lot to facilitate the February Revolution [which lead to the abdication of the tsar] was caused by a shortage in the production of railway rails, engines, and freight cars because industrial production had been diverted to munitions," Sokolov wrote. "During World War II, only the supplies brought in by Lend-Lease prevented the paralysis of rail transport in the Soviet Union. In order to really assess the significance of Lend-Lease for the Soviet victory, you only have to imagine how the Soviet Union would have had to fight if there had been no Lend-Lease aid," Sokolov wrote. "Without Lend-Lease, the Red Army would not have had about one-third of its ammunition, half of its aircraft, or half of its tanks. In addition, there would have been constant shortages of transportation and fuel. The railroads would have periodically come to a halt. And Soviet forces would have been much more poorly coordinated with a constant lack of radio equipment. And they would have been perpetually hungry without American canned meat and fats." Georgy Zhukov himself was even monitored by the KGB to have said "People say that the allies didn't help us. But it cannot be denied that the Americans sent us materiel without which we could not have formed our reserves or continued the war. The Americans provided vital explosives and gunpowder. And how much steel! Could we really have set up the production of our tanks without American steel? And now they are saying that we had plenty of everything on our own." Tldr; The real significance of Lend-Lease for the Soviet war effort was that it covered the "sensitive points" of Soviet production gasoline, explosives, aluminum, nonferrous metals, radio communications, and so on. Under Lend-Lease, the United States provided more than one-third of all the explosives used by the Soviet Union during the war. The United States and the British Commonwealth provided 55 percent of all the aluminum the Soviet Union used during the war and more than 80 percent of the copper. It also sent aviation fuel equivalent to 57 percent of what the Soviet Union itself produced. Much of the American fuel was added to lower-grade Soviet fuel to produce the high-octane fuel needed by modern military aircraft. American aid also provided 4.5 million tons of food, 1.5 million blankets, and 15 million pairs of boots. It shipped 400,000 jeeps and trucks, 14,000 aircraft, 8,000 tractors and construction vehicles, and 13,000 battle tanks and 180 billion USD (In today's currency).
@StupidAThandle2 жыл бұрын
@@gaminglichgamer4035 you deserve way more likes you literally wrote a SA
@tabaluga97505 жыл бұрын
Never again war with our russia brothers... GERMANY + RUSSIA
@yoshilorak58975 жыл бұрын
Little do you know that Goths and Slavs hate each other for thousands of years.
@โชกุนเกมเมอร์-ฤ7น5 жыл бұрын
Ussr + germany = nazi union?
@jonasstockl58965 жыл бұрын
@@โชกุนเกมเมอร์-ฤ7น no soviet reich
@freshbaboboss16655 жыл бұрын
No, Berliner Pakt or Pact of Iron and Work or something like that
@eliteFFM5 жыл бұрын
Brothers ?! 😂😂😂😂
@vittoriuz5 жыл бұрын
"And 2 of his sons - Vasilij and Svetlana."... no comments
@clydecourtney9945 жыл бұрын
Svetlana was a very pretty.....boy? Just one of about "one billion 800 thousand" errors!
@MegaChemicus5 жыл бұрын
Yup, yup, dude
@davestang54546 жыл бұрын
As for the Pacific war in World War 2, the United States would have still prevailed against the Japanese with no assistance. The American strategy for winning against Japan would more than likely have been different but arriving at the same results. Every senior Japanese commander knew that challenging the Americans could only be effective for 6 months,at most, before the American factories were able to outproduce the Japanese Empire on a massive scale. Both the Nazis and the Japanese made the same strategic blunder in expanding their empires far beyond the capacity fo their military forces to hold them.
@caseyengle73246 жыл бұрын
I agree.
@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese2 жыл бұрын
Wrong. America had the japanese naval, military and diplomatic Cypher decryption in 1940. America wanted Japan to attack and knew it.
@memelord27992 жыл бұрын
By late 44 the US was producing a fleet carrier (Large ones like Enterprise) every month and at least 5 Escort Carriers per month. They also had the population to train and rotate pilots in and out of combat.
@503tasmanio Жыл бұрын
Tbh if Germany didn't declare war on the U.S, the Germans wouldn't have spent so much money on the Atlantic Wall and they could've sent more men to the east as well as resources.
@AOSMAKAKMS Жыл бұрын
@@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheesewrong, with nothing to back your claim up.
@vladnegru5144 жыл бұрын
I think it's very interesting the fact that Britain's choice ,if they want peace, changed the whole world!
@The_Beefcake_Cometh3 жыл бұрын
@G E T R E K T 905 Well yes but Britain would have had to surrender to Hitler, not exactly a terrific deal.
@The_Beefcake_Cometh3 жыл бұрын
@G E T R E K T 905 but what makes you think you Hitler won't go back on his word like he did with Munich agreement and all the other treaties and pacts he's violated?
@Daffa-xs4ry3 жыл бұрын
@G E T R E K T 905 Do you seriously think so? damn
@Chicken_Nugget13 жыл бұрын
@G E T R E K T 905 Why on Earth would you surrender peace with the tragic war crimes Germany committed constantly?? And with a ruler that clearly was never going to stop no matter what. Peace meant nothing to Hitler. Nor did any rules of engagement in War. Hell even humanity to its most basic level meant anything to him. Couldn't be me to yield to an evil tyrant like that. Churchill saw it. He was the one we finally needed to act on that, we'd already allowed more than enough to go down by then.
@Chicken_Nugget13 жыл бұрын
@G E T R E K T 905 Nothing even anywhere near on the same level as the mass killings of Jews, homosexuals etc. The gas Chambers, what both Germany & USSR did with the constant mass executions to the already surrendered Polish. Although two wrongs do not make a right, Hitler was immeasurably worse in both action and intent and needed to be stopped, a man that wanted the entire World so he could destroy everybody in it.
@TheAgProv5 жыл бұрын
Stalin had a son called Svetlana? Errr... she might have corrected you on that...
@johnc.56004 жыл бұрын
She became transgender
@darrelarno91514 жыл бұрын
Svetlana in history: Stalin's daughter Svetlana I know: a sledgehammer used to pound meats
@JerryP7a4 жыл бұрын
@@darrelarno9151 is boris
@starleighpersonal4 жыл бұрын
@@darrelarno9151 BORIS
@dannyturkian90834 жыл бұрын
Wasn't his name Yakov/
@mermaidboy896 жыл бұрын
With 6900 tigers II tank you could conquer the world...love it
@wildfire39866 жыл бұрын
nukes tho
@vevosontungm-tp15096 жыл бұрын
mermaidboy89 tsar bomba
@222oree6 жыл бұрын
They would probably break before the borfer.... Heavy tanks are only good on the defensive battles.
@antonnym5636 жыл бұрын
Everything financed with fiat money. Created out of thin air. It is time for an anarchistic society. I use Bitcoin / Monero.
@MsJakob20106 жыл бұрын
germanys nuke was in hiroshima and Nagasaki and 1000 ME 262
@arrow31232 жыл бұрын
I think Germany during the WW2 was overpowered, it takes the greatest two forces on earth USA and Soviet together along with Great Britain and the rest of Europe countries to take them down If it was one on one no army could have defeated Germany
@nein2362 жыл бұрын
So overpowered we had massive nerfs in natural ressources, allies, and manpower.
@mushroom11g552 жыл бұрын
USA could've beaten Germany in a long fight because they can't touch our homeland, and if they tried to invade they would have to fight a bunch of American Gangsters, Hunters, hobby shooters, cowboys, along with the military. We barely had a military at the beginning, and we had the best production, eventually we would overwhelm them.
@arrow31232 жыл бұрын
@@mushroom11g55 Maybe but it's the same goes with opposite, I mean USA alone may win but that will cost them a lot of time, blood and money, but having great British, Soviet Union, France and many other countries and not mentioning those who Resist against the Nazis from inside as well
@suckyourdeadnan48052 жыл бұрын
Britain were above the USA at that point it was only after the war when the US took the second spot off world power
@yoldast622 жыл бұрын
@@arrow3123 nuclear bomb bruh.
@blindscience17013 жыл бұрын
I've watched all of your videos and I have to say. That they're all thought provoking and great source of What if or an look into an alternate universe. So keep up the great ideas, my good sire.
@vardgesbokhyan99275 жыл бұрын
This video leaves out an important part: Some of the USSR countries could have switched sides to get freedom, imagine, for example, if Caucasus switched sides and helped Germans to get to Baku oil reserves in exchange for freedom, bet Germany would love it. This is pretty realistic, taking into account their plans on Caucasus.
@bagger80783 жыл бұрын
@Kwen he did say “some”, not all, not with direct support from Germany, could’ve been Kazakh revolt. and he used the Caucasus not Ukraine or Byelorussia as an example because it would’ve supplied Germany with desperate needed oil smart fella
@sgtreznov98692 жыл бұрын
ahahahahahahahah
@Afrancis162 жыл бұрын
@@sgtreznov9869 completely deconstructed his argument there good job.
@McLarenMercedes2 жыл бұрын
To OP. "Some of the USSR countries could have switched sides to get freedom, imagine, for example" That is impossible. The nazi ideology means all those countries and their people are considered "lesser people" by them. Fact is that this is *exactly* what happened in the Ukraine; Belarus and many other Soviet republics. At first the people believed they won their "freedom" from Stalin. Then they quickly learned that Stalin's police-state prison was better than the nazi extermination camps. They could play charades with Stalin and get spared. They could play no charades with the nazis who considered them "sub-human". You're speculating if Nazi Germany would offer those states "freedom" when this something that isn't even considered among the nazis. " bet Germany would love it. " No, because they are not fooling anybody with their ideology at this point (even Imperial Japan and Fascist Italy had serious qualms siding with it) and they're NOT into offering people they loathe any kind of bargain. The only country they offered some sort of fair deal were the British following the fall of France. For everybody else it was simply conveyed as "You do exactly as we say or else..." Historically this has *never* been a good way to convince other people you're their friend and ally. And Caucasus isn't a country. Neither is it populated by people the nazis consider "worthy". Last of all, what could Nazi Germany *possibly* offer the people of Caucasus to make them consider "switching sides" ?? HOW are they going to get these assurances??
@Afrancis162 жыл бұрын
@@McLarenMercedes Tbf Japan did some terrible shit that was probably equal to the nazis if not worse. During the rape of Nanking a Nazi ambassador (I forget what he actually was so ambassador it is) openly protested it and went around stopping rapes in progress. Of course he is just one person and not all Nazis would have done that. But yeah I don’t think Japan really cared. Other than that I agree with what you said.
@antonmoric14696 жыл бұрын
Without the 250,000 trucks the US gave to the Soviets, their logistical chain would have been even poorer than the German one, despite the much longer distance the Germans had to manage. This alone would have greatly altered the outcome of the war, let alone many other factors, such as Germany not being decimated from the air by British and US saturation bombing of industry and civilians.
@brianticas76712 жыл бұрын
Damn so the usa really bailed russia out and yet russia thinks they took germany out all by themselves. Hell no. Germany would have murdered them if it didnt face the obstacles it did.
@TheRealBillBob Жыл бұрын
bull
@AOSMAKAKMS Жыл бұрын
@@TheRealBillBoball talk, nothing to back your shit up.
@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese Жыл бұрын
Correct. The Soviets were a western welfare state.
@teeby2037 Жыл бұрын
@@TheRealBillBobIts true!
@stochasticwhistles5 жыл бұрын
"Hitler and Mussolini die at the same day in 1964" holding hands in same bed.
@thetruthaboutfacts2245 жыл бұрын
WOW good one, I would not give a comment like this a like most of the time but wow so good.
@g.o.a.t22025 жыл бұрын
I ship it
@Pilum10005 жыл бұрын
I would say - here neo-Nazis masturbate tirelessly to their sick fantasies :>
@rasil815 жыл бұрын
The men did not really like eachother though
@punkhyena8753 жыл бұрын
I honestly think people minimize how close this war actually was and the dire consequences of a german victory I appreciate everyone actually doing there part. Imagine the number of soviet casualties without allied strategic bombing if the soviets could have even survived long term Every partizan every soldier every pilot did there part.
@annoyingbstard94073 жыл бұрын
Yes. At one point the Nazis had overrun nearly 2% of Russian territory. Before they retreated.
@punkhyena8753 жыл бұрын
@@annoyingbstard9407 Imagine if the Russians where like you and didn't put there industry on trains.
@punkhyena8753 жыл бұрын
@@annoyingbstard9407 I think you are likely to stupid to understand land is useful for defense only if its defended and you can make bullets to defend it otherwise it should be made inhospitable .
@zdynasty79752 жыл бұрын
Soviet casualties were really mounting up when the Germans were on the losing side so I think a German victory may be beneficial to the world. No Soviet means no Cuba, North Korea and most importantly, no communist China either, a better world. 😊😊😊
@punkhyena8752 жыл бұрын
@@zdynasty7975 fuck no
@ScarlettSKcat6 жыл бұрын
WW3 McDonald’s vs Burger King Hamburger vs Lettuce
@joshuacruz12275 жыл бұрын
Number 15 burger king foot lettuce
@mobilecyclop73295 жыл бұрын
T series vs pewds
@gabenewell39555 жыл бұрын
Mobile Cyclop series won
@g.o.a.t22025 жыл бұрын
Pepsi vs coke ww4
@5ch4rn5 жыл бұрын
My favourite bit was when "highly" was pronounced "higgly". Still interesting tho.
@charityjackson26015 жыл бұрын
I am txnping whit my foit
@thefricking54074 жыл бұрын
@@charityjackson2601 Bruh
@blueeyeswhitedragon98395 жыл бұрын
I really wanted to watch this video, but the computer voice was too much for me. Can't you find someone to do a voice-over?
@Dietsch_5 жыл бұрын
just turn the volume off lmao
@blueeyeswhitedragon98395 жыл бұрын
@@Dietsch_ :- I did, & the video!
@velenix3955 жыл бұрын
@@blueeyeswhitedragon9839 lol
@williampurvis28875 жыл бұрын
His real voice is much worse
@turkepic36375 жыл бұрын
@@Dietsch_ heyyy my clone!!
@marcghawi81945 ай бұрын
the most realistic simulation!! thanks for the video
@caractacus62316 жыл бұрын
I know this is a Russian saying this so some here doesn't mean anything but Khrushchev said: `I would like to express my candid opinion about Stalin's views on whether the Red Army and the Soviet Union could have coped with Nazi Germany and survived the war without aid from the United States and Britain. First, I would like to tell about some remarks Stalin made and repeated several times when we were "discussing freely" among ourselves. He stated bluntly that if the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. If we had had to fight Nazi Germany one on one, we could not have stood up against Germany's pressure, and we would have lost the war. No one ever discussed this subject officially, and I don't think Stalin left any written evidence of his opinion, but I will state here that several times in conversations with me he noted that these were the actual circumstances. He never made a special point of holding a conversation on the subject, but when we were engaged in some kind of relaxed conversation, going over international questions of the past and present, and when we would return to the subject of the path we had traveled during the war, that is what he said. When I listened to his remarks, I was fully in agreement with him, and today I am even more so.`
@vertie20906 жыл бұрын
that's interesting, didn't know that
@rs720986 жыл бұрын
Nope, Germany lacked oil and natural resources, as well as military strength and equipment. The US would have crushed Germany one on one.
@caractacus62316 жыл бұрын
@@rs72098 though without the UK that would have been much more difficult..invading from North Africa?
@josephdockemeyer48076 жыл бұрын
KingJustice98 - The question was not the US, the question was Russia WITHOUT US AID.
6 жыл бұрын
where did you find this statement by krushhev ?
@rokball48926 жыл бұрын
Finally! I’ve waited for 4 months to watch this video and finally it's released!
@ramonroman80766 жыл бұрын
ROK Ball, go and watch any American war movie, is much better that all this crappy video. What a waste on time. You must be the most simplistic guy in the whole world, expecting that the past be changed by these morons that made the video. Poor empty brain guy. That war is over and possibly another one is coming produced and directed by the president of the USA, mr Trump. Let's see if anyone is left alive on the Earth to make moronic videos.
@rokball48926 жыл бұрын
ramon roman Stop trolling around here. If you want to troll to others why won’t you go somewhere else?
@noodlesausage42336 жыл бұрын
ROK Ball
@Irgendwelche55 жыл бұрын
@@ramonroman8076 Bwhahaha 😂
@ramonroman80765 жыл бұрын
Your response is proving my point. The only people that likes this moronic video is people like you, with a brain with no neurons. Why don't you give a response with at least something that can be understood by a worm? You bloody can't, you love nonsense.
@zanzao-1ps3186 жыл бұрын
I haven't seen such a greatly made and very interesting video like this for years!! Each consideration you made was perfect! Well done
@fordhamdonnington27386 жыл бұрын
Yes it has been years and years and years and never has there been great video as such as this! And now it is here! It is with great joy that I enjoy the wonderous new video!
@markusz44476 жыл бұрын
NO it was not. 1. Even without lendlease, Germans would not have been able to pull the thing off within 1 year. 2. The main goal for the Barbarossa Offensive have been the important caucasus oilfields. But yes, with free access to world ressources without the british blocade and without the allied bombing, the Sovjets would have had it way harder to defeat Germany
@nubitynub17576 жыл бұрын
@@markusz4447 Germany wouldn't need to go for the Caucasus in this since they had trade from the west due to no blockade or two front war.
@paulmacfarlane2076 жыл бұрын
the germans would have won easy.if they were only fighting russians.
@markusz44476 жыл бұрын
@@nubitynub1757 of course they would. Would you think that, even in this scenario, they would want to remain fully dependent on foreign oil exports for the upcomming expansion? Expansionism was part of their political Agenda. I do know that it was possible to produce fuel from their synthetic raffineries, but that is highly ineffective and expensive as well. Besides I think that it is a bit unrealistic for the Germans cede Belgium in a peace deal as it is the only way to any offensive against France... (no way through the Maginot) Also no war with Britain/France/US would not mean unlimited access to markets they are controlling. I am not a foreign speaker so excuse me if there are a few misleading phrases ^^
@sayedmahbub8933 Жыл бұрын
"With 6900 Tiger 2s, you can conquer the World" Best quote I've heard in a while.
@qanon79584 жыл бұрын
In resume: Oil shortages were only a thing because the british enforced a naval blockade, the video explains how half of the luffwaffe was expended on the western front, how the production equivalent of 6900 tiger II tanks was used to make U-boats to try to emulate the british blockade and starve them into surrender aswell a 25% of the total artillery and ammo production being used on western anti-air defenses The eastern front might have sucked most of the manpower, but the western front sucked most of the resourses
@opperturk1244 жыл бұрын
It said 7k tigers. Tigers didn't exist in 1942. They could have made panzer IV though
@qanon79584 жыл бұрын
@@opperturk124 Yeah i forgot to add that, panzers were not heavy tanks like the tigers but were cheaper so there would be a whole lot more than 7K
@qanon79583 жыл бұрын
@abdullah slhllr I wish i had a good pc to play on :(
@ericvonmanstein21123 жыл бұрын
And we think that Russia alone won the war and allies only joined in 1944 when Germany was retreating blah blah she also forgot to tell one of the best commander Erwin Rommel and africa korps engaged in africa The reality is that allies already joined in 1939
@qanon79583 жыл бұрын
@@ericvonmanstein2112 Yup, basically naval production it's super expensive compared to anything land-based, that's the most important bit
@celtofcanaanesurix22456 жыл бұрын
Why is it that literally any other timeline seems better than our own?
@gildedphoenix6 жыл бұрын
Because in no other circumstances war drag itself longer than 3 years and causing exaustion to anyone even to those do not involve themselves with war.
@Brugar186 жыл бұрын
every alternative timeline better than our own you say? hm... american civil war won by south? guess that would be a good alternative right?
@spooky74396 жыл бұрын
i dont think that the slavic people woud not like to get enslaved and shit
@dynamo88466 жыл бұрын
A bit idealist at the end maybe, nevertheless an enjoyable senario and video
@Brugar186 жыл бұрын
@@rock3tcatU233 Even if so, how about the states economy end up? How strong the state would be? How about crimes that are commited by non blacks?
@warmonger87996 жыл бұрын
NO WAR PLEASE ,BOTH GOT HOT CHICKS AND AWESOME BANDS
@warmonger87996 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE HLC .
@martinmueller42406 жыл бұрын
Bands go to Germany but chicks maybe Russia? lol
@warmonger87996 жыл бұрын
@@martinmueller4240 classic dude
@suatkaratas86006 жыл бұрын
Whoowh your right dude
@suatkaratas86006 жыл бұрын
But wait we dont want bands or hot chicks we want victory and powerrrrrr hahhahhahhaaaa. Сука
@Frank-ex2pb5 жыл бұрын
Better we🇩🇪 drinking with the 🇷🇺 thats better for all 😁😁😁🍺🍺🍺
@uToxicCake5 жыл бұрын
Me and the boys uniting to stop USA from world domination
@nikolaysokolnikov26775 жыл бұрын
Make booze, not war)
@crusty_cookie30995 жыл бұрын
Maybe 🇰🇵
@h.t.awesome38225 жыл бұрын
Star Trek Theory fuck that
@wut47375 жыл бұрын
The war over the drink. Beer or vodka?
@heavenasuncion37943 жыл бұрын
THE BEST ERA THAT WE DIDN'T REACHED
@blockifahad3 жыл бұрын
If you mean technology uhm i guess
@JogenMogen2 жыл бұрын
@@blockifahad not at all
@avelus59845 жыл бұрын
The ultimate battle between fascists and communists.
@Pembunuh-Zionis-Pesek4 жыл бұрын
Facist for god
@zhongxina76014 жыл бұрын
Capitalism❤️
@goblin-six41134 жыл бұрын
Wtf man, Germany was not a fascist
@arnabmukherjee94084 жыл бұрын
Nazis v Communists
@KHH5954 жыл бұрын
@The Paranoid What qualifies as fascist in the modern era?
@nirad80266 жыл бұрын
I didn't know Stalin had a son named Svetlana
@zvallid6 жыл бұрын
@@paulwhite760 sons, not son
@titoistickibokelj12946 жыл бұрын
Daughter
@werybad6 жыл бұрын
@@zvallid kzbin.info/www/bejne/e5-0kGaXo9WKh80
@ethanedwards4226 жыл бұрын
Daughter, he hated his drunken son. He had the other one shot because he gave up and got captured.
@vevosontungm-tp15096 жыл бұрын
Nirad802 she had a relationship with a jewish photographer that made Stalin angry and Stalin expulsed the jewish photographer to a gulag in a artic island in 1943.
@k-8746 жыл бұрын
"They attacked Finland" Me: *"Awww Snap!Here we go again,Winter war"*
@glandau80594 ай бұрын
Superb content thank you for creating historical videos. 💯💢💥
@soapmaker22636 жыл бұрын
Yeah, in our timeline Germany had troops spread all over the place -- North Africa, France, all of Eastern Europe, etc. At the end of the war there were 400k German troops in Norway, for example. They were fighting in all directions. The naval war in the Atlantic was a massive expense of labor and materials. The Luftwaffe was spent in the skies over Britain and the allies enjoyed overwhelming air superiority. All major German cities were bombed into rubble. Her industry was utterly crippled and railways were destroyed, compounding logistical problems. The atlantic wall was an absolutely enormous project. They had no oil. And they had to contend with communist partisans and saboteurs in occupied territories. Yet they still put up an incredible fight. 1v1 with the soviets, the reds would have been crushed. Every tank, plane, bullet, man; all German industry, engineering, and military might directed at a single enemy, on a single front.... Plus they would have several million anti-communist volunteers from across Europe joining the war effort (in our timeline over 1.5 million volunteers). And any extra weaponry and material Germany couldn't produce themselves they could just get from trade. Honestly, soviets would not have stood a chance. It would still be a titanic struggle, but Germany would definitely have won.
@jacobreinhardt87245 жыл бұрын
Britain surrender: perhaps. Russia surrender: Never!
@samuelskogqvist55654 жыл бұрын
@@jacobreinhardt8724 Good counter argument, that surely made people change their opinions on the subject.
@Dth-str3 жыл бұрын
You are right.
@Neater_profile2 жыл бұрын
@@samuelskogqvist5565 These men are your héroes too. Show some respect.
@sy39346 жыл бұрын
the suicide choice that Hitler made was stopped attacking Britain instead invading Russia. He should take Britain first. then there would be no ground holding for Americans later on Europe . strategical failure for Germany. if he really want Russia land, he could do that later, after united west euros.
@StCreed6 жыл бұрын
Yes. The "strategist Hitler" decided that opening a war on multiple fronts was a smart idea. In history that has never worked. But apparently Hitler thought that "this time it will be different!". You know you're in trouble when you start believing your own propaganda about "weak and degenerated enemies" and base your military strategy on wishful thinking.
@pr-tj5by6 жыл бұрын
Keep dreaming boys, Nazi's are gone !!
@richparker94386 жыл бұрын
I think he tried lol
@jamiemcghin56896 жыл бұрын
You show extreme ignorance
@odincoulombe7066 жыл бұрын
Stalin was creeping up to the west,he had to go in and send him running.
@Moyano__3 жыл бұрын
This video puts into perspective how much the Germans actually accomplished having all the world against them: Atlantic defenses, 25% of production devoted to AA guns, embargos everywhere, U-Boat production, V1 and V2 rockets which were the pinnacle of rocketry for years to come, powerful tanks, first assault rifles, first use of jet aircraft in combat, having to carry their idiotic allies, etc. and they still managed to defend themselves against enemies with 3 or 4 times the manpower, tanks, aircraft, etc. for a long time. They could have even gotten the atom bomb did they really care to do it. Germany truly deserved to become another Superpower and would easily have been one, probably not the dominant one, but still winning on the technological front. Even now Germany is the dominant force in Europe, not even two defeats, a division and all its capital destroyed were enough to push it too far back.
@annoyingbstard94073 жыл бұрын
They were never alone. The axis powers were Germany, Austria, Finland, (Vichy) France, Italy, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, yugoslavia and Japan. Less than a third of the axis forces were actually German.
@blorb329 ай бұрын
@@annoyingbstard9407 Croatia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Austria, Vichy France and Finland weren't really that significant. Sure Finland was crucial for a northern campaign but Germany alone could have accomplished that. On top of this, Italy was more of a nuisance than a benefit for Germany. I guess the only somewhat competent countries from that list would be Romania and Hungary.
@a101reasons33 жыл бұрын
Great video man.
@БратецРевольвер-ц4ч6 жыл бұрын
"two Stalins sons - Vasily and Svetlana" made my week:)
@adrianbrice7542 Жыл бұрын
One on one Germany wins against anyone. Germany faced 3 super powers.
@thomashagen13583 жыл бұрын
Germany was fighting all 4 countries at the same time and he split himself making himself weaker. That’s why he struggled to the very end
@thediaz073 жыл бұрын
Yes. Germany did very well too. Amazing the amount of tech and organization of the armies they were able to pull off. Imagine if the US GAVE GERMANY THE LEND LEASE? Europe would've been Germanys.
@firstofitskind3 жыл бұрын
True
@BeniTheTesseract2 жыл бұрын
@@thediaz07 Never in any world where FDR is President would Germany get a lend lease... thank the Lord. Which wouldn't have helped Germany much. They had more than enough weapons.
@thediaz072 жыл бұрын
@@BeniTheTesseract what? Production of those said weapons is the key. Imagine the luffwaffe on steroids? Or kreigsmarine?
@leonodonoghueburke42762 жыл бұрын
@@thediaz07 Without the manpower or fuel to fly them? Good luck
@Shrivatsasagar Жыл бұрын
You my guy! Are restoring my faith in youtube alone. Thank you
@kennethferland55796 жыл бұрын
Overall lots of good points in this video about historical misconception around the war. German ability to import Oil would be by far the biggest factor, lack of oil is what really made the German advance stop, not just that they could not transport it across Russia, they did not HAVE enough to begin with. If German oil imports are unlimited and their cities not bombed then they have unlimited time horizon for victory.
@bayarsejar5831 Жыл бұрын
Yes that is true because the four month plan to victory in the east was because it would run out of fuel by then.
@emperorpalpatine31255 жыл бұрын
seems about right to me edit: my username used to be adolf hitler
@tsarnature65875 жыл бұрын
Too bad,muricans won in the end and both of us lost.
@stalingaveusanorder62625 жыл бұрын
@@tsarnature6587 Your php and username is Joseph Stalin. The irony hurts so much.
@tsarnature65875 жыл бұрын
@@stalingaveusanorder6262 Sorry comrade,I dont use capital letters because I hate capitalism.
@stalingaveusanorder62625 жыл бұрын
@@tsarnature6587 How did Murica win?
@Yrojrund5 жыл бұрын
Megumin they won by sending a fuckton of supplies to the allies in which they were in and kinda booty raped Germany, and in the Cold War democracy won following the collapse of the USSR. So in the end I guess Murica kind of did win lol. America has turned fascist. Oh shit!
@turaln48583 жыл бұрын
One of the more important notes on operation Barbarossa in this scenario is that Stalin would had not been caught with his pants down as he did in our timeline - although both Hitler and Stalin knew the inevitable war between Germany and USSR was coming, Stalin didn't think Hitler would be crazy enough to invade while still battling Britain on the western front. In fact when British intelligence was trying to convince Stalin that Germany was planning the attack, Stalin shook those points off, being convinced that this was a ploy by British to engulf Soviets on the eastern front. If there was peace between Britain and Germany in this scenario, I'm curious what preparations Soviets would had made prior to Barbarossa.
@uggycyvhvyvyv7322 Жыл бұрын
The Soviets wanted to join the Axis powers but Hitler was too ideologically opposed to communism
@onlyfacts35024 ай бұрын
Not a chance in hell of Russia winning against Germany. Although Germany suffered the majority of its casualties on the Eastern front they still dedicated a significant amount of troops, and resources to the west. If you add 50+ more divisions, an air force that would’ve been twice the size in the initial invasion, an unfathomable amount of tanks, factories not being bombed, more than enough oil for 10+ years of war, and unthreatened supply lines behind the front?! My god…how is this even a question?!?!
@kindlingkingАй бұрын
Unfortunately, what you're describing is purely your imagination. Significant number of soviet troops were guarding eastern borders throughout the whole war. If we assume it's just Nazi Germany vs USSR, then any extra resources the former can gather would be met with reserves from far east. Also unfathomable number of tanks? What? Germans had already allocated most of their resources towards eastern campaign, where would those unfathomable reserves come from? From Hitler's ass? Your only real arguments are increased presence of Luftwaffe and undisturbed military industries. However even before starting to get kicked back german economy was on it's limit. It simply couldn't support large scale attritional war, which it why even in this scenario Germany would still ultimately lose, although it will likely take more time.
@lutgardonabo3195 жыл бұрын
*zvallid* your name should be *Second World War Changer* BTW nice video I like it
@timedexplosivechargemother98246 жыл бұрын
So I just woke up And I see zvallid has uploaded My man you have MADE my day
@clash32796 жыл бұрын
Lol same story here
@Choiisaac094 жыл бұрын
soviets: ATTACK Germans: Fritz are those children? soviets: made 90% of children Germans: nap time
@zememes32594 жыл бұрын
U mean 90% were children in nazi army
@thorvanheghe40234 жыл бұрын
Woman an childeren did help to make fortifications but they didn’t pull the trigger
@aoxgam3r2744 жыл бұрын
Giving u the 69th like
@cybershit46124 жыл бұрын
Every German is a gangsta Until the snow starts speaking Russian
@thorvanheghe40234 жыл бұрын
Njörðr of the Atlantic 3 Words Siege of leningrad
@DrewPicklesTheDark4 жыл бұрын
Khrushchev wrote in his memoirs, that Stalin admitted that without US aid, Germany would of defeated the USSR.
@Nosferatu4024 жыл бұрын
He's not wrong no one can fight germany alone it's basic suicide cause german strategies and engineering are far superior than any country at the time
@Hitman-8894 жыл бұрын
He wasn't wrong.
@ThomasWLalor6 жыл бұрын
FASCINATING hypotheses. A lot of "IF's" but believable, and well done. Thanks, much
@hugman605 жыл бұрын
This is interesting. Have read a lot about the Eastern Front during the Second World War. It is these "what ifs" make one wonder how much things may have been different. Thank you for sharing it.
@michahunicz17416 жыл бұрын
How the Confederacy could have won the American Civil War and what would happen after the Southern victory? Inb4 Harry Turtledove.
@zvallid6 жыл бұрын
Hi michal! good idea
@zvallid6 жыл бұрын
@Black Vitriol What? The southen states were not poor.
@charlesnapoleon90706 жыл бұрын
Michal, that would mean, that only the South would side with the Entente and the North with the CP. Maybe Mexico would side with the CP too, to get Texas back.
@michahunicz17416 жыл бұрын
@@charlesnapoleon9070 Mexico wouldn't be able to do anything, as the CSA would create its own influence zone in Latin America.
@charlesnapoleon90706 жыл бұрын
@@michahunicz1741, don't forget we are during WW1. After the collapse of Russia, the CP could send enough help to Mexico to let them win.
@w.allencaddell64214 жыл бұрын
German let's the "Desert Fox" General Rommel loose on Russia. Russia would still be speaking German today.
@이동연-c6d6 жыл бұрын
11:46 Tiger vs Bear?🐯🐻 Not Eagle vs Bear? 🦅🐻 The tiger is not a symbol of Germany. Besides, the tiger is the symbol of Korea over the centuries with the dragon.🐅🐉🐯🐲
@jimiacuwhg38366 жыл бұрын
이동연 I thought the same
@n4ppin6 жыл бұрын
Yes but you may know the Tiger tank. Maybe that's why he used a Tiger for the Germans
@earlwyss5206 жыл бұрын
@@n4ppin That's how I took it.
@cicopga16716 жыл бұрын
Eagle is symbol of Italy munezz
@Preuen-zs1fz6 жыл бұрын
Wait wild Tigers still live in Korea?
@barney2x46 жыл бұрын
Very nice video! It shows that you don't need a gigantic budget to make a quality video on KZbin - just brains, time and effort! Good job, zvallid! I think Barbarossa had a better chance of success than Sea Lion. Britain is well defended by a sea. The USA are an impregnable fortress, separated by two oceans from any potential enemy. I think even if we start the "what if" at June, 1941 (not 1940, for example) - Germany could have won if some things (realistically) were different.
@dennispaulin67805 жыл бұрын
I agree Barney. Maybe if BEF was not allowed to escape Dunkirk...but still, even German invasion of Norway using Destroyers was very costly. Plus RAF was superior to Luftwaffe and we know what air superiority does.
@kingmac66383 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: those 850k men from other axis countries made up mainly army group south and when Germany was encircled at stalingrad it was the Romanians that were overwhelmed on their back
@gumdeo3 жыл бұрын
While in the North, Finns and Spaniards played an important role.
@kingmac66383 жыл бұрын
@@gumdeo mhm, the fins greatly improved the German capacity to fight in the winter and the army group north wasnt pushed back as much as the others when winter came
@sryskyhosh2 жыл бұрын
This channel is pure gold
@jordanthomas43792 жыл бұрын
Germany probably would have won, don’t forget, the Soviet Union was receiving hundreds of millions from 42-45 in military aid, weapons, ammunition, fuel, trucks, food, guns. Without it, I’m not sure the Soviets would have won against Germany
@kaiserdb6 жыл бұрын
Those who believe this scenario's outcome would be no different than real life... are failing to consider some enormous differences between the two situations. - Germany does not have to devote a large portion of production to uboats --> increased German production - Germany is not being bombed from '42 on by Americans or British. --> increased German production, more available troops for the East, more available anti-air for the East, no skilled pilots lost fighting non-Soviet allies increases Luftwaffe capacity in the East. - Germany has a navy with nothing better to do than to attack/blockade Soviet ports, meaning that whether or not other allies aren't fighting, they can't trade with the USSR anyway. So on top of lack of material assistance from allies --> No USSR ability to acquire foreign goods, unless via Siberia. - It is not necessary for Germans to commit resources to the construction of the Atlantic Wall, nor to keep dozens of divisions in the West to respond counter any allied invasion --> more divisions in the East. - None of the fighting in Africa or Italy ever happens --> more divisions in the East. - USSR receives no intelligence assistance from British project Ultra --> increased Soviet fog of war. The sum of the differences in Germany's fighting and production abilities in the two scenarios is MASSIVE and could easily have tilted a 1v1 war in their favor, and I believe it would have: Germany would have a small boost in men and material at the start of Barbarossa, but the difference between scenario and reality grow over time: more men and machinery available to start with and the greater/faster ability to replenish. It's a double whammy - the scenario makes Germany stronger AND the USSR weaker. Even if the Soviets still win the Battle of Moscow, the battle of Stalingrad was very closely fought, and I believe the advantages described above would've changed the result of this battle -- and the consequences of this are huge. The Volga is a key artery for the Soviet Union and German control of the river around Stalingrad is a crippling change in situation. Then, once Stalingrad and the Volga fall, it is likely that Case Blue's other thrust, into the Caucasus, is a success as well. From there, German victory is only a matter of time. The best the Soviets can hope for at this point is a stalemate where the Ural mountains separate each side. But at this point, the Soviets are little more than a nuisance.
@kaiserdb6 жыл бұрын
Additionally -- Without other fronts or opponents to worry about, there's no reason to assume that the Germans wait until June 22nd to start Barbarossa. Launching even two weeks sooner might have made the difference between victory and defeat in 1941, as mud-then-winter did about as much to slow German progress as the Red Army.
@piramida36846 жыл бұрын
But you forget that hitler suprise stalin with attack,so think twice
@kaiserdb6 жыл бұрын
@@Atlantis1789 Stop at the Urals? He never reached them in the first place.
@adriantheo7654 Жыл бұрын
@@piramida3684i think it will be the same also
@MrJimmy17172 ай бұрын
Ya we also watched the video. Why you're reiterating it like it was yours is beyond me.
@earthstar3936 жыл бұрын
Great video! One tip: it might be worth getting someone who speaks English as a first language to proof read the script, as there are a few grammatical errors which create a small amount of confusion, but on the whole, a brilliant watch!
@zvallid6 жыл бұрын
it's difficult because the text is modified while I do the video
@generalzova9213 жыл бұрын
I think the script is fine. The spelling errors are completely fine and the grammar errors aren't an issue either.
@felixgeyer43873 жыл бұрын
Great Video! As always, keep up the great work!
@martinsayago92632 жыл бұрын
As a russian guy. I have to admit our country was weak. If this happened I would say our country will lose against the nazi germans. Our country was corrupted with riots and many genocides began. We were weak in all types of things, aircraft, ships, guns, but we wernt weak of men. Except we were useless in trying to defend the line. I have to admit that we didnt have any good planes to defeat the bf and the ME. If this would of happen I gotta say my country would dissolve and we will lose against the powerful germans. Thankfully that never happen😔🙂
@SosaL4322 жыл бұрын
i also dont think that the soviets would be able to produce nukes in 1951 in this timeline like the video says, because they would have to recover from the great patriotic war, and the second russian civil war. the soviets also were not that well lead either, because of the great purge. but if stalin didnt do the purge he wouldve been overthrown in 1937-1938, alot of people dont know this, but alot of the generals and soviet officials were secretly in touch with trotsky in mexico plotting to overthrow stalin. but imo he shouldve been overthrown, and if he had been overthrown if he didnt start the purge in the first place, i think the soviets wouldve done somewhat better in ww2 like they did in our timeline, because they wouldve been much better lead.
@martinsayago92632 жыл бұрын
@@SosaL432 your right. I don't t think we would be able to produce nukes bc we would have to recover the horribleness things Joseph stalin did to our precious country. Genocide, purges, forcing men into the army in order to push the germans away and if we refused we be executed. Mexico, was one of our friends. During the russian civil war the red army blocked few ports in our country. The bolsheviks did do this. The white army tried to stop the engaging blockades but the red army were already there with there weapons ready to fire. Mexico, helped us all. During our starvation from the communist party mexico sent food to the russian civilians and we shared to make no one die of starvation. I cant say but it would have been way better if the white army defeated the bolsheviks. Stalin knows what he had done, but hes always hiding it behind his fake nice smile on him. We didnt have guns such as the german ones. We had outdated ones, garbage scrap of tanks, and our ammunition was low. We did have enough planes but like I said they were scrap metal and poorly designed. Nazi germany had initial success trying to take 40% of our land, lend-lease helped us push them back which was known as the battle of stalingrad. We didnt surrender. The germans were literally a heartbeat away taking stalingrad but the plan was to kill the nazi generals and it worked. I'm very glad mexico sent food to us not to starve, and usa making the lend-lease act to have weapons to defeat the germans and push them away. So I'm glad we had some cover but the relation between russia and usa is not so warm today since the russian invasion of Ukraine 2022 had started. Hopefully we dont get to the gates of world war 3😔
@SosaL4322 жыл бұрын
@@martinsayago9263 also, i forgot to mention, in that timeline, i think the nazis would also want to puppet belarus, and the caucasian regions for sure since that was their goal.i also think that in that timeline the bolsheviks would start producing nukes in the 1960s, or the really late 1950s if theyre lucky. and you're right, the bolsheviks in ww2 had a massive but weak air force, and alot of guns, but outdated ones, they also lacked some of the technology. alot of people say in the comments of this video that the soviets would win, but they are dead wrong tbh, they forget that food is a vital resource for an army, they also forget that even though nazi germany didnt have as many weapons as the soviets did, their weapons were way better, with a more advanced, but not as big army.
@martinsayago92632 жыл бұрын
@@SosaL432 Ur 100% right. The nazis did want to puppet Belarus. Belarus was one of nazis most wanted countries. They wanted it bc they are a huge ally to russia. In volgograd, we have a museum and I saw this one document called the nazi manipulation. The article was written by a german solider who died of cancer. It started out when nazi germany saw the vital allies of russia. There main goal was to invade and capture all russian allies such as belarus, and some other Baltic states that were sympathetic to russia. In order to defeat russia easily, they had to capture all allies of russia so they could give out information. It also talked about the whole plan about capturing russia such as Ukraine and the others. Hitler wanted to puppet all vital allies of the soviet union to change and manipulate there ideological power. Nazi germany also wanted to kill many civilians during their manipulation. They did this to keep the russian guessing that there civilians are in chaos and they would be killed and russia will have there population low meaning they would have no other options but to surrender. This is a important document and that's why it's called the NAZI Manipulation. Actually, we did had a missile to be launched at germany. We created and built a copyrighted missile of germany called the V2 ballistic. If u search it up on google u would see that russia actually used it, but dont let that fool you, again we were super weak in supplies and we lacked many materials. We actually had some newer planes to fight against the luftwaffe such as the La-5 but we only had like around 300 bc we lacked so many so we had no other choice but used the old outdated planes to try and protect our nation but we failed bc we were so weak in everything and the germanys were literally a sword and we were paper they just sliced us up. Thankfully, germanys weakness was there logistics. Which we targetet. And thank god we built the t-34 just in time so we can match against the panzer and tiger tanks. We didnt really have bombers, our bombers were literally made from tiny pieces of metal. Literally, the anti aircraft guns literally shred all of our hardworking bombers and enormously destroyed our 2 year production of bombers in just 2 days. But the main key to survive and have some power is food. We didnt have much so we suffered of that to. If it wernt for the usa land lease, god knows who would have won but I gotta day nazi germany would have won. And if it was germany against the soviets alone I have to agree that nazi germany would destroy and crush us easily like a slice of cheesecake. Even though I'm russian, I have to agree that germany would of won if this chaos had fallen.
@SosaL4322 жыл бұрын
@@martinsayago9263 and one more thing, if the Germans win in the siege of Moscow in this timeline or the battle of Moscow in real life, they also after not long would’ve taken Leningrad and Stalingrad since I think if they won the siege/battle of Moscow Stalin would have committed suicide in the Kremlin or at his home in the dacha. After that I think the bolsheviks might be forced to the peace table and set up a Siberian government, and the Germans would create a strong defensive line around urals, because they only really cared for west Russia.
@pusitegasupovci86005 жыл бұрын
One on one, Germans would crushed them.
@andrj88445 жыл бұрын
nope
@darklysm83455 жыл бұрын
@@andrj8844 yes.
@andrj88445 жыл бұрын
@@darklysm8345 no.
@andrj88445 жыл бұрын
uh no
@andrj88445 жыл бұрын
@Hubert Turski no you are not. the soviets would not give up of the germans took moscow. and russia had so much manpower that there was no chance for the third reich to win
@brobro726 жыл бұрын
Hey, guys. I know this is a very controversial topic. I'm a sci-fi fan, and this kind of work really appeals to me. I think that from a purely entertainment point of view, this is so well done. Who ever compiled this work should WRITE. Whoever you are, you Rock! I hope you are familiar with Philip K. Dick's 'The Man in the High Castle'.Frank Spotnitz's take on it rocks!
@matheuspc6802 Жыл бұрын
Yeah but the series ended up horribly
@matheuspc6802 Жыл бұрын
The man in the high castel from amazon I mean
@TheDreserDeviant69 Жыл бұрын
Great stuff mate, leep on doing it
@siegkientoff88645 жыл бұрын
I don't think there would have been a peace agreement between Russia and Germany. The Germans were within 30 miles of Moscow and Stalin was prepped to evacuate Moscow. I think that once Moscow was in the process of being encircled that Stalin would have fled and someone else, probably Kruchev, would have taken control surrendered to Germany. I do question his thoughts that Japan would not have attacked Pearl Harbor in this scenerio. They were not connected to the war in Europe. It was a totally different subject. America wasn't at war with Germany when Pearl Harbor was attacked so the Japanese had no reason to expect that they would be fighting anything but the entire US fleet. I can't connect the dots on how the war in Europe, which the US wasn't a part of at the time, had any bearing on Japans decision to attack Pearl Harbor. He did hit one thing right on the head. Hitlers true downfall was Churchills refusal to accept any peace agreement. And he was right. It hurt the UK more to continue the war than it would have to accept Hitlers peace plan. WWII would have never gotten to the point it had if it wasn't for Churchills stubborness to defeat Hitler at any cost. Hitler made 2 mistakes in my opinion that cost him the war. He didn't have to invade Russia when he did. He needed to get the war in the west over before he took on Russia. If Britain wasn't going to accept a peace agreement then he need to pour all his resources into that to either get them to the peace table or get them to surrender. He almost had the air war won when he backed off and he cancelled his plans for an invasion of Britain which may have forced Britain to the peace talks. If he wasn't so involved with Russia he could have had the resources to do that.
@ankushraj95833 жыл бұрын
He was short on oil that's why he had to attack Russia.
@46FreddieMercury913 жыл бұрын
Maybe if he hadn't declared war on America, he could have ignored the lend-lease fact. The British alone could not have invaded Europe like D Day. Even if Britain received supplies, it was pretty much unable to open up another front on mainland Europe
@annoyingbstard94073 жыл бұрын
The most insane comment I’ve ever read.
@cringyhuman32103 жыл бұрын
It’s different tho because Russia is much weaker in this scenario and Germany doesn’t have to fight to fronts
@TheGorillaGang3 жыл бұрын
Russia: Has millions of not mobilised soldiers Also Russia: barely does anything to stop Germans near Moscow. Also: you said partisan involvement was exaggerated in every country, when Partisans almost single-handedly liberated Yugoslavia.
@zvallid3 жыл бұрын
Apart from leftist dreams If there were only the partisans Jugoslavia in 2021 would be still under Nazist
@TheGorillaGang3 жыл бұрын
@@zvallid I kind of agree and disagree at the same time.
@mikemikeetoo90943 жыл бұрын
@@zvallid No after years of fighting Yugoslavia you have been liberated. Look how Algeria liberated itself from France or how Vietnam liberated itself from 3 imperialist countries using guerilla tactics and communist ideals
@Natogoon6 жыл бұрын
Your English and video’s are getting consistantly better. Great job! You should really consider narrating your video’s though. Greetings from the Netherlands.
@jonathanspivey437 Жыл бұрын
Interesting take on the scenaro. This was a scenario I have a strong interest in as well and it was nice to see it analyzed with such good presentation.
@mnpd35 жыл бұрын
Not a particularly difficult question, considering that Germany had the military genius but limited resources and territory, while the militarily less-competent Soviets held vast territory and resources. In a rapid war of maneuver, the Germans would win. In a protracted conflict of attrition, the Soviets would prevail. Hitler played his cards spot on, until the 1941 invasion of the USSR. For Germany, the issue in the west with England was still unresolved in 1941, as well as North Africa. It was a time that Germany could ill-afford adding both the USSR and the USA to the enemies list. But, that's just what Hitler did, assuring the defeat of Germany 4-years before it actually happened, and leaving historians forever asking "why."
@michaelwier12225 жыл бұрын
Hitler was counting on a quick war with the Soviet Union, after seeing their performance in Finland
@AnthonySenpaikun5 жыл бұрын
It didn't matter how much tanks one could produce but how much oil and supply trucks has to supply and keep them running. Germany would win surely as they had more supply trucks than the soviets alone since the soviets would not have any lend lease support. Even if the soviets were able to achieve a breakthrough and push the Germans, they wouldn't even be able to push far enough and have to stop and wait. Giving the Germans more time to lick their wounds then pushing again for a counter attack. The lend lease also provided the rations needed for the soviets to focus on producing military equipment, maximizing their tank and arms production as the soviets lacked the rations needed alone, and would have to divert many of its labor force to agriculture to feed the already exhausted and starving nation since many of its farmlands have been taken which would only lead to more problems since they don't have enough fertile land to use.
@captjim0076 жыл бұрын
If my aunt had balls , she would be my uncle.
@RandomGuy96 жыл бұрын
Racer X wiser words have never been spoken.
@nightprowler63366 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@senorpepper34056 жыл бұрын
yes, yes he would
@mkzhero6 жыл бұрын
Yep, what the hell, such weird and stupid questions. If the rest of the world wasn't involved, then the soviets wouldn't sit Idle too! Heck, they'd probably conquer Europe and Germany itself before Germany even set out to conquer other European countries and grew its might as much as it did. But even that's pointless to think about.
@christianhoffmann86076 жыл бұрын
"If my grandmother had wheels, she would have been a bike"
@marktisdale805810 ай бұрын
Missed was the fact that two thirds of the tanks that stopped Germany in front of Moscow came from UK lend lease.
@YourLocalUkrainianGerman5 жыл бұрын
"Laftwaffa" 😂
@leantouon46375 жыл бұрын
Lol yes
@khronosis69344 жыл бұрын
it's actually spelled almost good. The right spelling is "luftwaffa"
@nerevarchthn68604 жыл бұрын
Khronosis that’s the fake English spelling not the real spelling
@quasar79514 жыл бұрын
Lustwaffle
@rinyc91004 жыл бұрын
Luftwaffe
@acegabrielcruz36873 жыл бұрын
"Without the Help of America we would have lost" General Kruschev
@fergar92643 жыл бұрын
amazing !!!! you just have said a cuote tha Krusche never said , you also have promoted Kruschev the grade of general !!!
@loafbread19203 жыл бұрын
Germany would literally won easily one on one on Russia..
@fergar92643 жыл бұрын
@@loafbread1920 witout the 20 million slaves from Poland and the occupied europe , the Chekoslovakia ,industry ,the looting of trucks in europe , Germany could not even sept ay the treeshold
@loafbread19203 жыл бұрын
@@fergar9264 kzbin.info/www/bejne/e5-0kGaXo9WKh80
@loafbread19203 жыл бұрын
@@fergar9264 just use 🧠 so you can easily understand it
@TheRedAirOn4 жыл бұрын
Russians act like they could have beat the Germans ALONE. They had lots of help and after WWII, the countries they "liberated" were just under new management. Still, respect for fighting the good fight when they had to.
@edmiesterful4 жыл бұрын
80% of the German army was fighting the soviets without which the normandy invasion would have failed, imagine millions more german soldiers on the beaches, so the soviets helped the western allies as well, if you want to compare the germans and soviets here are some stats German occupation of Poland: 6 million poles killed Soviet occupation of Poland: 150k poles killed the soviets werent trying to exterminate most of eastern europe like the germans
@onceGoat4 жыл бұрын
@@edmiesterful these stats are also based on the fact, that there were almost no soldiers in the Eastern side side of Poland, cause yk they were defending the western side
@edmiesterful4 жыл бұрын
@The RightStuff Khrushchev was full of crap.
@edmiesterful4 жыл бұрын
@The RightStuff Germany invaded alongside: Romania Finland Italy Hungary Slovakia These countries gave many soldiers and the Germans got supplies from occupied countries like France, Belgium, Holland etc. Nazi Germany would lose even quicker if they fought the Soviets alone.
@TheRedAirOn3 жыл бұрын
@@edmiesterful you're that the Soviets weren't trying to exterminate people like the Nazis...they were trying to enslave those people since they are no use dead and that is why Communism is the greatest system to enslave the masses. Absolutely nobody could take on the Germans alone. The Soviets relied on Western intelligence, weapons, infrastructure, equipment, and support on the battlefield. I mean the Germans fought on 3, almost 4 fronts.
@nikolasfrederickschleiswig41753 жыл бұрын
French: " We'll win again this time " Germans: *already at Paris* French: " Wait, WHAT "
@danrion88396 жыл бұрын
Thank god, I was not born in those countries and in those times. Barbaric Situation.
@LostSpaceGuy6 жыл бұрын
LibHunk you would face reality if you were born there
@jimbeauchamp11356 жыл бұрын
Pussy.
@kunalgaurav72226 жыл бұрын
Who knows you were there , but don't remember now .
@BGTom5 жыл бұрын
Without lend lease aluminium, the Red Airforce has half the planes it does. No lendlease steel means they have 2/3rds the Tanks they would have had.
@strafniki10803 жыл бұрын
ok but we are talking pure germany not europe right?
@generalironsteel52365 жыл бұрын
Do a video what if Spain joined the Axis and at the same time Nazi Germany had a strong Navy
@user-YuHaoHuang5 жыл бұрын
The last time Germany had a navy----looks at William 2nd
@generalironsteel52365 жыл бұрын
I knew that German Navy was very strong In WW1 But if they had a strong navy in WW2 Maybe they could have done Operation Sea lion and maybe it could have succeeded
@jerseymontolalu20305 жыл бұрын
Nazi have a strong navy, they just not strong like UK
@rileymiller77865 жыл бұрын
What if Turkey and Spain joined Axis?
@infoprod77312 жыл бұрын
27:06 This dude was almost killed in the Great Purge, but he was only jailed or whatever and Timoshenko urged Stalin to bring him back