@4:40 I would give anything to live in that timeline! 🇮🇳 Kadam Kadam Badhaye Ja!
@PORKMANPIGКүн бұрын
Sigh...what could've been 😢
@stuartturner7672Күн бұрын
Sorry but if Britain would of sided with Germany their never would of been a war against the US, the US wanted nothing to do with the war take into consideration an alliance between Britain, Germany and Japan would of seen the US do everything possible to avoid a conflict because the US would of been utterly surrounded by the biggest powers in the world at that time not to mention how could the US of fought 3000 miles of sea in one direction and 4000 miles in the other, sorry to say this but the US military in 1939/41 was utterly outclassed in terms of equipment
@The_Titan_Of_Күн бұрын
Great video technically, I just find unrealistic that Britain would still be the biggest global power after the war
@lows285Күн бұрын
Trump would love a Germany like this so does the rest of the USA ❤
@daviddelgado6090Күн бұрын
This scenario tilts on two critical decisions by Hitler: Barbarossa and the declaration of war against the US.
@zvallidКүн бұрын
@@daviddelgado6090 stupid decisions
@Fanumtax69420Күн бұрын
Okay okay, but now how would life be like if the Allies won WW2?
@jamesb.9155Күн бұрын
Imagine all the carnage going on inside all those shot up aircraft, especially to bomber crews in those slow moving, fully loaded lumbering B-17s, 29s and so on. Air crew death toll was staggering.
@jamesb.9155Күн бұрын
The Messerschmidt Bf-109's shot down so many Allied planes! There are still air-worthy Bf-109's with their original inverted V-12 supercharged 35,7 liter Daimler-Benz engines which make fantastic sound on a low pass dive!
@Huskerguy316Күн бұрын
Axis Powers vs ✡️ Powers
@Huskerguy316Күн бұрын
There was zero reason to go to war over Poland. There was universal acceptance that Danzig and the corridor rightly belonged to Germany because it was 95% German. The only hope Poland had of not being swept behind the Iron Curtain was an alliance with Germany against Bolshevism. Poland though had already beaten the newborn Reds in 1921 and therefore still believed they were a Great Power capable of also beating Germany. The Delusional arrogance of the Polish government threw away Europes only chance of destroying Bolshevism and saving itself from being plunged under the Red Wave.
@Huskerguy316Күн бұрын
Basically if The F✡️cus didn’t exist
@catalinmarius3985Күн бұрын
Would both Hungary & Romania join the Axis? They hated each other over Transylvania. In our timeline, Romania only joined because it faced existential threat from the USSR, but in this timeline, with Bessarabia being secured, it had no reason to join. Hungary however, who was more aligned with Germany, would demand Transylvania with German support. While Romania was aligned with France, I can see this going 2 ways: Either France supports Romania and manages to stay neutral, or Romania becomes USSR's only ally in the war. Later in the video, after the war ended, I don't think Romania would give North Transylvania to Hungary without a fight, the whole reason they went to Stalingrad in our timeline was to take back North Transylvania, Hitler promised Romania that they will turn a benevolent blind eye if Romania attacks Hungary after they helps them.
@salvatoregreco88432 күн бұрын
you can do as France could invade Europe in 1939 plss
@zvallid2 күн бұрын
you mean attacking germany?
@salvatoregreco88432 күн бұрын
@zvallid yes, France following the path of WWII Germany
@Kristhebear8562 күн бұрын
The world would have culture discipline and intelligent hard working people
@naypowell17152 күн бұрын
I hope your son’s okay ❤😢
@zvallid2 күн бұрын
yes he is all right thank you!
@naypowell1715Күн бұрын
No problem glad that’s everything fine have a merry Christmas❤
@muhabkharras44202 күн бұрын
I just watched this, and it is truly astonishing! What a remarkable alternate history video. I am unable to support with a donation, but I would like to assist in other ways. Thank you for the credit.
@zvallid2 күн бұрын
I hope to continue to have your help for the future and thank you again!
@daviddunn77842 күн бұрын
Thought I was tripping and had to rewind but yep definitely heard the Hells March music from Red Alert at 30:46. Made me forgive all the mistakes with the grammar 😂
@zvallid2 күн бұрын
indeed the music is "anamalie" with a march sound on the background
@daviddunn77842 күн бұрын
No change on what side wins but maybe the war would of lasted longer. Still after America and the Soviet Union got up to speed with manufacturing ability, there is no way the Axis could of won. Britain had the capability for that too and with time and planning they might if competed industrialy but the logistics would of gone against them with how spread out the Empire was, still the Royal Navy would held off a land invasion and unless the Yanks and Ivan got H bombs the loss of life would of been insane on all sides 😢 (written before watching, let's see if I was right? At least by this video)
@zvallid2 күн бұрын
may be you are right
@mrsentencename7334Күн бұрын
Nah, British Germany and Japan would be unstoppable. Barbarossa would have been successful and they’d have all of Europe, Asia, Africa and the Middle East as well as half of North America
@wiwiksundari86682 күн бұрын
May Allah 'Azza wa Jalla gives the right path & heedayah Islam, Tawheed, Qur'an & Sunnah to all of us. HasbunAllah wa ni'mal wakeel
@Aaron_Guest2 күн бұрын
Alright, so I thought for a while, and I have some criticisms. First, the Soviets would've been building up defenses for the Axis invasion for months, as they would see them for the massive threat that they were, and would prepare for it. So it would cost the Axis, more men, time, and resources to push into the Soviet Union as they'd be fighting against a more prepped Soviet Union. Second, it's very unlikely for the Japanese to be able to be nearly as effective as they were in OTL with Pearl Harbor, as not only would the U.S. be more prepared for it, but they would also not have the inspiration of the attack to go on (the Battle of Taranto) as the British wouldn't be at war with Italy, meaning it wouldn't be near as effective. So Pearl Harbor would either not happen, or result in lesser U.S. losses. Third, Canada would've been taken out in at max a month or two after Pearl Harbor, (or whenever the war starts) the U.S. had 2.2 million men in the military and in a scenario where a hostile Britain and Canada around, it'd be far more men, so the invasion would've been far faster, before the Axis could deploy many troops to Canada, not that they would've anyway, as the British plan for war against the U.S. was to face them in the seas (aka don't send troops to a lost fight) and Canada's would've been to quickly invade the Western U.S. (when they were outnumbered and being invaded real smart Canada especially when those regions would've been defended) before retreating to wait for the Brits to come, so Canada would be done for. Also, there would be no large Canadian defense in Northern Canada supplied by the Axis, because it'd be practically impossible to do, with the U.S. attacking them, and because there wouldn't be enough men to still fight there. While a puppet Quebec would've been set up. Fourth, you completely forgot the Caribbean here, the British still owned islands there, and they would've been targets of amphibious invasions and bombings until they were taken, which they would be taken within a year max. Also, it would be highly likely that the British would suffer a large naval defeat there. I'll also say that it's highly likely that the U.S. gets Mexico to join the war, and allows them to control British Honduras after the war, along with much of South America. Five, the U.S. would move to take Greenland and possibly Iceland shortly after the Islands in the Caribbean were secured, for the purpose of hemisphere defense, because while Denmark wasn't a German ally, Germany could easily invade it and use it as a base to attack the U.S. because nothing would stop them from quickly taking over Denmark. Sixth, Japan would still be beaten here, while the British would provide SOME support to them, it wouldn't be enough to change big battles like Midway, (especially since the U.S. would crack the Japanese Naval Code still) also the Battle of the Coral Sea wouldn't happen at all, due to the U.S/Australia not being allies. I'll even say that with no Africa front, and less focus on Europe since they don't need to protect Britain, the U.S. would make faster progress in Island Hopping, however I'll also say that Australia would've been navally invaded and taken by U.S. forces some years into the war, to remove an enemy, and set up new naval and airbases to fight against Japan. (Also, considering the pretty poor naval performance against the Japanese, the British naval performance most likely would've been pretty lackluster) Seventh, the German strategic bombing campaign against the U.S. would be a horrific fail for the Germans, lets say that they manage to build a sizeable number of Me 264 bombers, (which had bad design problems) with them being completely (EDIT) UNescorted across thousands of miles, they'd be unable to even be effective because they wouldn't be able to carry large payloads, they at best would be ineffective, and most of them are going to be shot down in large numbers. Meaning that now the U.S. will be able to reverse engineer them, and the modified B-29/39s are going to be far more superior and have longer range, and turn into a super bomber. (the B-29 already was the best bomber of the war, and the most expensive thing of the war) While the same would happen with the hypothetical AmerikaBomber as well, so the U.S. would gain even better hybrid designs of U.S. bombers. (Also, Germany severely struggled with strategic bombers in general, it's unlikely they'd succeed here, unlike with much of their fighter programs.) Eight, the Chinese would never surrender, they were essentially facing a war of extinction, and they knew what the Japanese would've done and had been doing to them. Also, there would be no chance of the Japanese invading the Soviets, they had no compulsion to do it in OTL so they wouldn't have one here. Ninth, by the end of 1945 the map would consists of a Pacific that has Australia taken by the U.S., along with many islands taken by the U.S. as well, with many of them being used for the new super B-29s/B-39s to bomb Japan, all of North America including Greenland, and most likely Iceland as well, with both being used to launch bombing raids on Britain, (most likely just Northern Britain and North Ireland though) most of South America in the Allies, the Soviets still in control of most of their initially taken territory, (maybe half of Ukraine, Belorussia, Novgorod would be under Axis control, however they most likely wouldn't have been pushed back in the Caucasus region like you suggests, the Soviets would've fortified that region to the max do to it's oil) and an Axis controlled Africa and Middle East. Tenth, the Manhattan Project would still be around just with Soviet help instead of British, (which was minimal in OTL anyway) I'd say it'd just be delayed by about a year or so possibly, the the nukes would still be able to be used. It's likely that Britain (though it could still be Japan) would be the original target now, so after the nuking of several of the largest British cities, they are forced to capitulate or at least leave the Axis for negotiations, though I'll say that next the Germans would be impossible to heavily bomb or nuke, however Japan would still be around and as they first dragged the U.S. in the war, they would be nuked next, and be forced to capitulate. The peace conference would be in late 1946 or early 1947, held in France, and it would be that the British Empire is dissolved, Britain itself remains united but Norther Ireland is given to Ireland, the British African colonies are given independence with friendly U.S. governments in charge of them, India is freed and will be an ally of the U.S., Canada is broken up into territories and is brought into the U.S. with Quebec made an American puppet, Australia brought under a friendly U.S. government, U.S. keeps Greenland and Iceland, Nationalist China retakes it's land, Japan and it's empire turned into American puppets, German ruling over Central Europe, (all it's territory prior to the Soviet Invasion) Italy having it's empire, (it's occupied territory) and a Soviet Union that would be the same as it's pre-war borders. The Cold War would consists the U.S./Soviets/Britain/American puppets, up against Germany and Italy, up until mustache man's death, when it is likely that a civil war would happen in Germany. The U.S. would be behind in jet aircraft/rocket tech for a while, however with Soviet/British help the gap would be closed in a decade or two, (likely less though) France would most likely end up joining the U.S. aligned bloc later on as well. While the Germans and Italians wouldn't have nukes for at least a decade or so after the war. (They were no where near getting them, because they didn't have a nuclear weapon program) Now for my last criticism, it isn't about the scenario, but what you said after "This is the new world, it's not such a bad world" are you actually insane??? Tens if not hundreds of millions more would die throughout the whole world, most like 1 million+ U.S. casualties, a whole North American front with bombing raids on both sides, Eastern Europe getting millions of their people killed, China getting millions more killed. You are delusional if you think that would be in anyway true.
@zvallid2 күн бұрын
it was very interesting reading you. 1: france too had time to built defences in 1940. changed nothing. 2 USA needed a casus belli to enter the war, pearl harbour is perfect. in the end, it costs only the damaging of a few navies. 3 USA army was in a sad state, in the fisrt nonth of the torch operation they were kicked in the ass by a few german and italian divisions that were literally starving, the same would happen in the first months of canada invasion. then in Northern Canada is difficult for the axis to supply an army, but the same for the USA, so canadians would have been almost impossible to fight if entrenched there 4 i said bahamas and jamaica would have been invaded. I dubt that mexico would join USA in this situation. mexico and the other south american nations joined the war because they were sure of the victory. this is not the case. 5 in this case denmark then ireland, portugal and norway would have entered the war to avoid the same fate as denmark 6 a battle in the coral sea could happen the same, to cut australia from their allies. why SOME support of the british navy to japanese? royal navy in this situatiuon has nothing else to do. it's true that with no Africa front, and less focus on Europe since they don't need to protect Britain, USa would have more forces but the same and even more for the british. and if you consider the pretty poor naval performance against the Japanese of the British navy, you should consider the poor performance of US navy too, that ended only when they had a gigantic supremacy in numbers 7 Germany severely struggled with strategic bombers because they had few resources and were bombed nught and day. this is a different situation 8 there is no way china could survive. may be they don't surrender, continuing the fight in some way but they are defeated 9 In my opinion an invasion of australia is unrealistic 10 the British help was not minimal, however this war ends before nukes not a bad world, it could be worst
@Aaron_GuestКүн бұрын
@@zvallid it was very interesting reading you. Your videos are interesting. 1 1: france too had time to built defences in 1940. changed nothing. The French defenses failed because Germany managed to surprise invade through Belgium, (who were dumb and didn't follow the French plan) if they didn't do that, they would've faced a far longer war on the Western Front. There is nowhere that they could surprise invade a Soviet Union that was preparing for their invasion. They would still pushed them back, but Operation Barbarossa would still be a failure. 2 USA needed a casus belli to enter the war, pearl harbour is perfect. in the end, it costs only the damaging of a few navies. Are you saying that the U.S. knew about it? If so then the U.S. would have prepared to ambush the Japanese when they did it, to limit the damage on U.S. naval power, because now they would be the only ones fighting against the Japanese and potentially the Brits as well. 3 USA army was in a sad state, in the first month of the torch operation they were kicked in the ass by a few german and italian divisions that were literally starving, the same would happen in the first months of canada invasion. then in Northern Canada is difficult for the axis to supply an army, but the same for the USA, so canadians would have been almost impossible to fight if entrenched there In this scenario there wouldn't be almost any German troops, or even experienced Axis troops on that front at all, U.S. forces would have aerial/land/sea superiority by a massive margin, so you can't compare this to Operation Torch, and the Axis wouldn't send any troops there to help. As far as supply lines go, it would be infinitely better for U.S. troops to supply men instead of any Axis forces, which not that they would anyway. (British plan, abandon Canada) While any troops they did bring over would've been in very small numbers, and under supplied 4 i said bahamas and jamaica would have been invaded. I dubt that mexico would join USA in this situation. mexico and the other south american nations joined the war because they were sure of the victory. this is not the case. Then my bad then, I must've overlooked that part of the vid. But it is possible that Mexico/etc join it if it can be portrayed as "Us (hemisphere) vs them (Europeans) kind of war. 5 in this case denmark then ireland, portugal and norway would have entered the war to avoid the same fate as denmark Denmark yes, the rest no. Portugal wouldn't have anything to take for the the same purpose, same with Ireland and Norway as well. (Though it would be curious if the U.S. could get Ireland to join them, and you have a small front for Northern Ireland, that would be something. 6 a battle in the coral sea could happen the same, to cut australia from their allies. why SOME support of the british navy to japanese? royal navy in this situatiuon has nothing else to do. it's true that with no Africa front, and less focus on Europe since they don't need to protect Britain, USa would have more forces but the same and even more for the british. and if you consider the pretty poor naval performance against the Japanese of the British navy, you should consider the poor performance of US navy too, that ended only when they had a gigantic supremacy in numbers Alright, I'll say that's a possibility, but I don't think the U.S. would attack unless very certain in victory, or at least aircraft carrier supremacy. The Brits would send some, but the relationship between them and Japan isn't as good, as the one between the U.S./Britain, not to mention the difference in battle doctrine of them. Also, the British fleet would primarily be concerned with the Atlantic instead of the Pacific. (Though I will say those Atlantic fights would be absolutely legendary for a few years) 7 Germany severely struggled with strategic bombers because they had few resources and were bombed nught and day. this is a different situation It wasn't only productions problems they had, the planes themselves didn't perform well at all, unlike most of their fighters. They had poor performance, engine issues, pressurization problems, etc. 8 8 there is no way china could survive. may be they don't surrender, continuing the fight in some way but they are defeated They would still fight, even if they couldn't have a stable frontline, it would be the world's largest guerilla warfare campaign in history, and tie up countless Axis personnel, which would be enough for the U.S. to fight Japan. 9 In my opinion an invasion of australia is unrealistic I'd say it's pretty realistic, first take New Zealand, then build up to use as a staging ground for Australia. It would mostly be few troops fighting there, as with the seas contested and/or straight up under U.S. control, it'd be hard to move troops there for Axis forces. 10 the British help was not minimal, however this war ends before nukes It was minimal, also, it's severely unlikely for the war to end before it is ready. not a bad world, it could be worst It is worse in everyway.
@benlowe5782 күн бұрын
if British Empire joined the Axis, the axis wins. USA probably never gets invaded. But they'd have no ability to compete with a combined European/Japanese navy
@maddog75222 күн бұрын
Short story is the axis win
@matthewkurniawan40812 күн бұрын
Next: what if Japan got become more advance and join Usa in ww2 (kopenki no kantai plot)
@strategicfriedrik79762 күн бұрын
Allora: qual è il tuo prossimo video?
@zvallid2 күн бұрын
non lo so, forse russia e germania insieme nella prima guerra mondiale con italia e contro austria francia UK e USA. oppure con la repubblica di weimar che sopravvive, seguendo la storia di hitler che rimane un artista. altrimenti una ww3 con tutti contro tutti dopo lo scioglimento della NATO
@strategicfriedrik79762 күн бұрын
@@zvallid il terzo scenario è il più interessante secondo me
@MrRight-hn5pq2 күн бұрын
Britain wouldn't be flooded by third worlders.
@daveros11052 күн бұрын
Bro tf is that even mean it's not a bad world at the end ☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️
@zvallid2 күн бұрын
It could be worst
@daveros11052 күн бұрын
@zvallid with fascists and nazis everywhere i don't see a worst world than that
@Aaron_Guest2 күн бұрын
@@daveros1105 And genocides everywhere also.
@zvallid2 күн бұрын
@@Aaron_Guest fascist insted of communists, I think it's better. and indeed there are genocides and massacres in this timeline too
@Yuri_Mikhailovich_Kuznetsov2 күн бұрын
Shiny, beautiful, Nordic emerald mined from the highest peaks of heaven!
@malekmohamed74582 күн бұрын
make video about what if the kaiser was restored due to alternate dvnp victory in 1924 german elections
@zvallid2 күн бұрын
It could be a good idea
@KeyToTime2 күн бұрын
The UK really was shafted in WW2. By far the biggest looser of the war. Even France has been better off long term. Didn't help being economically ruined by the US in the postwar years.
@BRETT740222 күн бұрын
We’ve still got war mongering megalomaniacs in the world… but now most of them are American. Britain gets more like a Nazi state by the week. The Nazis were defeated but a lot of their ideas have been carried on, albeit in a much more subtle, systematic way.
@blitz-kun0053 күн бұрын
how would MacArthur escape? In our timeline, he went to Australia before going back to the US. This can't happen in this version.
@zvallid3 күн бұрын
so he will go directly in the US
@libertarian_man3 күн бұрын
America still would create the nuke first
@epiceratos20513 күн бұрын
Nice video Zvallid. Can you do video what if of ISOT (Island of the Time) For example, modern America in ww2 modern Germany alongside other former Central Power member in ww1
@zvallid3 күн бұрын
I think a modern army would easily destroy any "old" army but it's interesting
@Mr.Sakazuki3 күн бұрын
Guys! We need a part 2! This is too good of a masterpiece to let go!
@re1nz8893 күн бұрын
i wish this timeline was real
@xcris07VE3 күн бұрын
One of the most interesting alt history scenarios ever
@Gala-g2l3 күн бұрын
Bullshit
@gautamsrivastava16683 күн бұрын
Somewhere in multiverse, this has happened and this guy is aware 😂
@simplifiedminecrafter95283 күн бұрын
Dang, they even made a 9/11 joke.
@Anjana-3 күн бұрын
Watching Zvallid's video on 'what if axis-' after college exams is always a pleasure. ☺️
@animaazzurra18613 күн бұрын
Magari fosse andata così! Nizza e Corsica = TERRE ITALIANE 🇩🇰, e Savoia = CULLA D’ITALIA! 💙
@SergeantTylerWells3 күн бұрын
Looking at Europe and America today I don’t know if my father fought for todays world he would be ashamed of us today
@gordoncheswick41693 күн бұрын
Americans are about to find out!
@codythedoggo7671Күн бұрын
Most would disagree. We had him as president for 4 years already
@davidpalmer85503 күн бұрын
Im British and will never fight my American brothers!
@lucienfilippi54913 күн бұрын
Zvallid,you should definitly make a part two of this one
@zvallid3 күн бұрын
@@lucienfilippi5491 yes i think i Will do It
@strategicfriedrik79763 күн бұрын
@@zvallid qual è il tuo prossimo video?
@rootdoc19973 күн бұрын
Hitler declaring war on the US probably one of the dumbest decisions ever. But hey, we got Joe Biden now to basically top every dumb decision ever made by any world leader 🙂...This a is probably a fairly realistic scenario
@GeeAitch-r1r3 күн бұрын
Wait until Jan.20th. We will all witness a variation of it after that day...
@IZ4DAYZ_3 күн бұрын
This video felt like i was watching a highly funded documentary, very good watch!