yes there will be another part

Because they don't need too. The colonies of Germany in the rich regions of western Russia would be much more valuable colonies that the colonies Germany had before.

@@730-jmsony9 colonies were useless since 1850. Better East europe

thank you for the great suggestions

Really, I don't think there will be a deadlock. France would fall very soon, leaving the USSR and the USA alone. Russia would not receive the majority of the lend-lease supplies. Because a naval blockade by Germany, Italy, Britain, and Spain would stop that. Additionally, naval forces from Japan, the UK, Australia, and other countries would block a large portion of it from proceeding. Additionally, keep in mind that the USA and USSR are MUCH weaker in this era. In this timeline, bombs are being dropped on the USA. not as in our timeline. Moreover, pressure would come from all sides on the USA. The British fleet, the German fleet, the Italian fleet, the Spanish fleet, the Canadian fleet (which, incidentally, was the third largest navy in our timeline), and most certainly the Portuguese fleet since they are a traditional British ally. A British, Japanese, Australian, and New Zealand fleet in the Pacific would also almost certainly manage to push the United States through. Additionally, given that Germany and Britain in particular are FAR stronger militarily and economically than they are in our period, their industrial potential would be significantly bigger. I'll tell you each major power's industrial capacity from 1938 to 1939 (in OUR timeline). 1.) United States 28% 2.) Germany 12.3 - 12.4% 3.) The United Kingdom (NOT INCLUDING THE DOMINIONS) 11.1% 4.) 9.9% USSR 5.) France accounted for 4.1%. 6.) 3.4% Japan 7.) 2.6% Italy Just as Japan did ALONE in our era, Britain, Australia, and New Zealand would all work fast to capture east Asia along with Japan. Britain and Italy would protect not only the Middle East but also Africa. Eventually, forces from Germany, Italy, Finland, Britain, India, Poland, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Yugoslavia, Greece, Bulgaria, Spain, and Portugal would overrun the Soviet Union. Turkey would join, especially given how close Turkey was to joining in our timeline. The threat posed by the British was the sole reason they refrained from joining in our timeline. Given that Britain controlled Egypt, Palestine, Syria, and Iraq, they could have effectively imposed a blockade on Turkey and posed a serious threat to it. But as I mentioned earlier, in this timeline, when Britain is allied with Germany, it isn't the case. Bombers from Japan and India would probably target the Soviet factories in the country's east and central regions. Additionally, because the Axis essentially controls the Mediterranean, Atlantic, Persian, Indian, and Pacific oceans, they could trade with one another because the sea routes would be somewhat protected. As a result, nations like Germany and Britain, which are free of hostilities and bombings, would see a gradual transformation of their economies into war economies. Resources from the Axis's conquest of Russian territory, the Middle East, Europe, Africa, and East Asia would almost guarantee that the Axis would have plenty of supplies. And as I mentioned before, because the maritime channels are free of the US fleet, which is already getting squeezed through, Britain would still be able to trade with other neutral and friendly nations. Furthermore, neither the USA nor Russia possess as many U-boats as Germany did in order to RAPIDLY destroy merchant ships. In the end, the economies of the Axis, particularly those of Germany and Britain, would expand despite the conflict. An already stronger Japan could defeat the United States in the Battle of Midway if they had more intelligence and participation from the British. And that's about the extent of it. Axis research would finally obtain the bomb if the USA chose not to submit after the USSR fell.

@@AGoogleUser223 what do you mean?

@@daviddunn7784 what do you mean? What Is the correct way?

why revolts? for what?

yes

@@zvallid thank you. This is literally the coolest scenario I’ve ever seen

@@theseasonalgames810 what Is the correct way?

It means Britain and Germany join the Axis forces. Or, you can say Britain and Germany join forces.

@@zvallid It's okay. It's very easy to understand what the title means. You don't have to change it.

@@Mr.Sakazuki thank you!

@@zvallid Np! 😄

yes there will be another part

yes it will be one of the next video

@@zvallid ok

I think they will join

@@matheuws3710 wehrmacht was too strong

@@KingZE-V88 i agree