1969 World Series Game 7 Strat-o-matic

[@marklevine5844]

love ur commentaries dave

[@ChristopherWalrath]

Great series, Dave. Great finish! Loved it!

[@marklevine5844]

no way METS rule

[@AgustusM]

What a great idea. I love how you played the series with the variety of games. I can't believe I have never thought of that. Very very cool. Thanks for sharing with us old tech sports geeks

[@BaseballDemos]

Michael, when I saw it was a 3 base error I had to do a double take to make sure I was reading it correctly. It was a fun series to play out and I was neutral on who won which made managing both teams a little easier, no bias to worry about.

[@marklevine5844]

I'm a mets fan I'm angry

[@briangorman247]

Dave, really enjoyed the game even though the Mets lost. Great job!

[@BaseballDemos]

Steven, Good catch. I just noticed that. On the x chart the stars dictate runner advancement regardless of number of outs. The O's really should have pitched a shut out.

[@stevenkramer4762]

+Baseball Demos Dave enjoy your Strat rolling games. You do a good job.

[@Milcom34]

Great Series.....Go Birds. Thanks.

[@stevenkramer4762]

Weis should have never scored on Harrelson's x-chart single. Powell's 3 range factor and a d6 roll of 4 is a single with one star, runners advance one base.

[@marklevine5844]

wow lol big Dave

[@MikeTerran1976ova]

Good replay Dave, don't know what jones was doing out their to allow a three base error. cost the Mets the series

[@bobbicatalano]

Watching videos 👀

[@fourcups123]

What I never understood , why do we have that decision when playing by ourselves not to stretch the or to stretch the runners abilty an extra base . Sample the guy upabove who's the running the game decided to hold the runner from not advancing because the runner is a 1-11 vs swaboda -0- arm ? Does the super advance version atleast have it to where you can have an extra roll to see if there can be an attempt for that decison -sample - an attempt meaning 1-5 should bea roll for somebody with slow speed to advance , if more than 5 is rolled , then the decision was made by not allowing that 1-11 runner to advance , instead of the guy who's running this making that decision ?

[@fourcups123]

+fourcups123-ps - meaning by rolling for the attempt , to where if you roll within 1-5, and a 4 pops up , NOw you can honor the decision to roll again for that 1-11 chance , catch on anybody ??

[@marklevine5844]

bah humbug

[@50sFedoraMan]

Mike Cuellar is a left-hand pitcher, but with both Al Weis (1st at bat) and Bud Harrelson (at the 22:10 mark) you rolled onto the batter's card and looked up the results on the wrong side of the card - the red-side of the batter's card, which is the "vs Right Hand Pitcher" side of the card. I'm not sure it would've mattered either way because I couldn't see the other side (blue side) of the hitter's card where you should've been referring, but still, not paying close attention to details like that is not good, not good at all. I had to stop watching after that. It was just too annoying. Thanks for posting, though.