Ahhh, the good ol' Deuce Deuce. Follow us on social media: Facebook ( / motorweektv ) Twitter ( / motorweek ) Instagram ( / motorweek )
Пікірлер: 641
@Motorweek3 жыл бұрын
Want to help keep our weekly Retro Reviews alive? DONATE NOW: mptevents.regfox.com/motorweek
@ninjatacoshark3 жыл бұрын
"Now they improved the engine by 10 more horsepower, bringing it to 94" actually laughed out loud.
@michaels96573 жыл бұрын
The 1st gear was so steep off the line it was quicker than a 82 z28 or trans am for thousands less these were as cheap as a base camaro 4cyl , now talk about a joke, yeah they were bad but so was everything else I afforded one of these out of high school on minimum wage try to do that now.
@michaels96573 жыл бұрын
Who's the brunette talk a about a seductive woman.
@elguille9893 жыл бұрын
94 in 83 is pretty good, a DOHC 4 naturally aspirated 1.5 from Toyota gives 100
@kcarman883 жыл бұрын
Ive owned both engines the 81 2 2.2 and now the 83 2.2, and i can say the extra 10 hp does help
@gojackets48943 жыл бұрын
@@michaels9657 You need to look at the retro review for the 82 Trans Am. The TA was an auto. It would outperform a Porsche according to the review.
@jjojo20043 жыл бұрын
They had a cup of coffee and a pack of smokes in the center console!! YEAHHHH!!! 🤘😎🤘
@corionh47753 жыл бұрын
Prob had some Johnny Walker in that cup too 😂
@terryorcutt87393 жыл бұрын
Hellooooo early 80s
@CamaroAmx3 жыл бұрын
Salems in a old school pack. They were like knockoff Newports. Think they are still around.
@MrTheHillfolk3 жыл бұрын
@@CamaroAmx yea Salem's were for the late 40s housewife you'd see wearing curlers and a bathrobe and fuzzy slippers you'd see going to her mailbox at 2:47 on a weekday. She most likely had green mascara on too, just like J Geils band told us about in "musta got lost".
@NashandHall3 жыл бұрын
"Stopping distance from 55 was a very good 129 feet with very little fade" Forget the fact your facing 90 degrees the other direction and in the weeds!
@MultiSpencerc3 жыл бұрын
I thought it was odd though, the driver had the wheel turned to the right when he finally stopped...
@jakey200222 жыл бұрын
😂🤣😂
@TheScrubmuffin698 ай бұрын
@MultiSpencerc you can tell it was from counter steering
@andyl9920Ай бұрын
If it really goes to the right when braking. That is scary
@kylelang12383 жыл бұрын
Immediately upon opening this I thought “It better have an oil pressure gauge or they’ll hear about it!”. He is relentless on that one point in any 80’s car!
@devintariel37693 жыл бұрын
Its so important. A lot of cars have secret menus that show them, even in the 80s. Oldsmobile being a big offender.
@plmn933 жыл бұрын
"This is not our way to provide a merry-go-round for the local orphanage". Cars were so ridiculously bad in this era yet they still had a good sense of humor about it. Love it.
@basshead.3 жыл бұрын
German cars were very good back then.
@weedmastersr3 жыл бұрын
@@basshead. haha, no.
@plmn933 жыл бұрын
@@basshead. Luxury German cars, maybe. My sister had an Omni o24 with the VW 1.7. That engine was a miserable unreliable slug that ended up in the junkyard before it hit ten years old. Far worse than the Chrysler 2.2 in this video.
@toyoscio3 жыл бұрын
Not many Japanese ones which is why they really gained market share.
@plmn933 жыл бұрын
@@toyoscio You need to watch more of these videos. Japan certainly had their share of miserable junk.
@RockwoodJoe3 жыл бұрын
Ignore the stats, 80s cars were genuinely fun! Crappy brakes, tires, and suspension made 80 mph feel like 130 today. You needed skill and healthy dose of swagger to drive those beasts to the limit.
@CamaroAmx3 жыл бұрын
Explains why my friends thought it was crazy when I went fast enough in my Bronco II to break the speedo cable (3.8l from a T-Bird swapped in place of the crappy 2.9l), or when I would play a game with myself where I would purposely leave later and later to go somewhere just to see if I could still make it on time.
@whackamolechamp3 жыл бұрын
I had an 81 Audi with a whopping 71 HP. I also had an 81 Suzuki 125cc Enduro. Despite the low power I had a blast with both.
@mitchellbarnow17093 жыл бұрын
80's American cars, that's why I was in love with my 1982 Accord Sedan with a 5 speed manual!
@whackamolechamp3 жыл бұрын
@@CamaroAmx Wow, my best friend had a Bronco II with the 2.9 and a five speed. I used to drive it all the time and it was a slug. A 3.8 sounds like a perfect replacement. Rock on and safe travels.
@Livinghighandwise3 жыл бұрын
Yes the lack of any computer aided driving is definitely a thing of the past.. Driving was a lot more fun without it :)
@revelare_xvii62693 жыл бұрын
*Ironically the best handling Charger ever made.* 😂
@temper.temper5 ай бұрын
Not
@Guy_de_Loimbard3 жыл бұрын
0-60 in 9.5 seconds is actually pretty impressive for a car with double-digit horsepower. This car must have weighed next to nothing by today's standards.
@CamaroAmx3 жыл бұрын
2489lbs for the Shelby version. Base model weighed in at 2282lbs dry.
@christineayres70943 жыл бұрын
Its not bad but to put it in perspective a modern 1.2 litre Renault Clio in the UK where i live will do that same 0-60 , im amazed how little horsepower Americans get from a 2.2 over here for example the Vauxhall Insignia has a 2.2 engine and produces 180bhp and top speed of 147mph amazing how 30 years of progress advances things
@MaestroTJS3 жыл бұрын
@@christineayres7094 What you guys don't seem to understand is that the low HP numbers were made up for by higher amounts of low-end torque, which European and Japanese cars did not have. Instead, you needed to rev those engines, sometimes quite high, to reach an equivalent power band. It was a different focus, generally. Cruising versus racing/sporty.
@christineayres70943 жыл бұрын
@@MaestroTJS Yeah but why would you need low end torque in a car ? unless your towing a trailer or something but if i want low end torque id buy a Raptor which is much faster
@MaestroTJS3 жыл бұрын
@@christineayres7094 On the contrary, I would say why do you need high-end torque? People like low-end torque at stoplights, which is most driving. Also, I believe it allowed the engines to have lower rpm while on the highway. The power felt more effortless coming on as opposed to having to work for it on multivalve, high rpm engines.
@adamtrombino1063 жыл бұрын
You have to remember that this was a time where all manufacturers were struggling to try and make power and emissions, all the while try to find acceptable mileage. Carol Shelby, a long time friend of Lee's, was the best thing to happen to Chrysler during the 80s and 90s. The lil 2.2 was worked to 107 then 110hp, by Shelby engineers. Then in 84, Shelby worked with Garrett, Bosch, and others to help create the turbo 4. Initially rated 142, it grew to 146, then with an intercooler, 174. With the Lotus head, it made 224, by 91. The light L body cars with the turbo and 5 speed close ratio were some of the fastest US made cars you could buy during the 80s and 90s, all the while making high 30s low 40s hywy mpgs.
@mopar_dude92273 жыл бұрын
Adam Trombino Shelby gets the credit, but didn’t do the work. The success of the 2.2 and 2.5 turbos was due to Dick Winkles (chief engineer on the Viper V10 engine) and Kim Lyons. Shelby was nothing but a name at Chrysler at the time. Also, the Turbo IV did not come out until 1989. It was the Turbo II that made 174 hp and 200lb/ft of torque. The Turbo IV did make a top rating of 174 too, but it was able to reach it’s max boast in half the time and had a much broader torque curve while having better fuel economy.
@andyl9920Ай бұрын
Im all about great mpg. So if 47mpg is what i get from this charger, ill take take it
@bonestockgarage1222 жыл бұрын
18 second quarter mile, just as fast as the 1978 Corvette they tested.
@realazduffman3 жыл бұрын
I actually liked these back in the day. Still a competent design, utility and sporty looking. Doug DeMuro is watching this going goo goo over that cupholder/storage thing.
@SgtSnazzerino3 жыл бұрын
Q U I R K S A N D F E A T U R E S
@MrThatnativeguy3 жыл бұрын
D O U B L E T S H I R T S
@terryorcutt87393 жыл бұрын
Doug would give it a Doug Score of 5 total for not having Bluetooth or touchscreen.
@robertshea46523 жыл бұрын
and now it’s time to give this car a Doug score
@Trance883 жыл бұрын
@@SgtSnazzerino He would probably need to make a 2 parter to include all the quirks and features of this car.
@michaelhasse25683 жыл бұрын
Still own 2 shelby chargers, love em. 20 bucks for a timing belt, 30 bucks for a water pump. Incredibly reliable. 200k on one & 300k on one
@bennybradshaw99043 жыл бұрын
I have a Daytona Pacifica 2,2 I'm probably push 400hp nothing crazy
@theKevronHarris3 жыл бұрын
WHOA!!! The rear end had abruptly fishtailed at the braking test!!
@RandomGuyDan3 жыл бұрын
Welcome to FWD and no ABS
@CamaroAmx3 жыл бұрын
Also it’s quite obvious that the rear drums needed to be readjusted. Had this same issue with my AMX until I readjusted the rear brakes. Stopped straight and true after that. This was a press car. It was probably beaten half to death by 10 other “journalists” before they got a hold of it.
@MrTheHillfolk3 жыл бұрын
Go watch the old road tests with Bud Lindeman if you wanna see a charger get outta shape during braking. In comparison this was quite mild 🤭
@carlasghost656 Жыл бұрын
@@CamaroAmxA lot of cars left the factory that way at the time. They just needed to work, not work precisely. Quality control was an interesting concept, maybe even a goal, but it wasn't an enforced rule.
@andyl9920Ай бұрын
Right, and i wanted to buy 1, but seeing the brake test is giving me 2nd thoughts!
@CJWriter09253 жыл бұрын
That swerve was TERRIFYING, holy smokes.
@JoseLopez-ox6en3 жыл бұрын
In 86/87 I worked at a Dodge dealership. We had the Shelby Charger. But the car we most loved to hoon was the Omni GLH. We had the Daytona and Conquest too, but nothing made more smiles per miles than that GLH. That is Goes Like Hell.
@evanbarr92703 жыл бұрын
These weren’t bad cars ,they came out when I was a senior in high school and they had good performance compared to most cheap cars..
@evanbarr92703 жыл бұрын
A pinto
@evanbarr92703 жыл бұрын
pimpninja1985 a pinto
@davidg40263 жыл бұрын
Rose colored glasses my friend... This car was the worst of the worst! I took my driver's test in one of these piles of garbage, and I couldn't believe how unbelievably crappy it was.
@tomj44063 жыл бұрын
dont listen to ppl that comment on these that are in fact 12 yr old trolls or buy into the revisionist history of how bad they were. bs..i was there..great cars. & yes..they destroyed most econo cars of the day in acceleration and handling. they beat many V6 cars & gave V8 cars fits! far quicker than the 3.8L Ford T-Bird of that time and immensely better handling. ..if you laugh/disagree, you weren't there.
@tomj44063 жыл бұрын
@pimpninja1985 1982 Ford Escort, for one with 0-60 mph in 13.9. There's your refrigerator! Chevy Chevette diesel? 0-60 time of just over 20 seconds. Charger 2.2L was sub 10 sec if u recall. ..i could likely list 50 more cars, all far slower than the 2.2L Mopar cars.
@chuckanderson53303 жыл бұрын
Dad gave me a gray one for graduation. People forget that this car would out ran a iroc z, mustang gt, and most anything 0 to 50. Cars where slow back in the 80s. I would ran my friend in his dad's vette in a quarter mile would always win these cars where quick back then. Times are better know lol
@TastyGoomba2 жыл бұрын
0-60 is a quick 9.5 seconds! good ole 1983... love watching these retro reviews!!
@TheCarCrazyGuy3 жыл бұрын
"Rollin in my 2.2" 😂
@jeffreyknox93543 жыл бұрын
My '98 Camry 2.2 has more horsepower, safer and roomier... Beat that Charger 2.2! 🤣
@Yophillips32723 жыл бұрын
My 89 probe was a 2.2l, thing was pretty bulletproof to be honest. Same motor as the old mazda trucks
@MrTheHillfolk3 жыл бұрын
@@jeffreyknox9354 that's what 15yrs of development does
@markusantonio48663 жыл бұрын
Overhead camshaft or lifters were noisy.
@fernandochaves96652 жыл бұрын
The Probe its a beauty.
@tsomeone9503 жыл бұрын
Brakes are fine. Back then you didn't have abs This car swerves to avoid the accident for you. Cars had more feelings back then.....😂
@SataniaMcDowel3 жыл бұрын
Lmao!
@mpound973 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@thetreblerebel3 жыл бұрын
These 80s and 90s DSM and Mopar sports cars are so awesome, I'd love to have one!
@ozbad072 жыл бұрын
Back then a 0-60 time under 10 seconds was quite good. I had one and loved it. It was loaded with anti-smog devices I removed and it's power went up dramatically. A fun car for a 20 year old!
@exxusdrugstore3003 жыл бұрын
What a turdbucket... I want one
@jamesnardini3 жыл бұрын
I had one. Lasted about 6 months before the dealer took it back for countless problems. I ended up with a Dodge Colt instead.
@CamaroAmx3 жыл бұрын
Had a Plymouth version. It was fine. However it still is the slowest car I’ve ever owned. the lowest horsepower too (96hp). My old 89 CRX was 2nd with 106hp.
@Njderig3 жыл бұрын
Lmao! 😂
@johnmcaleese84593 жыл бұрын
@@CamaroAmx Would I be right in assuming that your CRX was a lot more fun ???
@CamaroAmx3 жыл бұрын
@@johnmcaleese8459 of course. The CRX had more power and was a manual trans.
@pl56243 жыл бұрын
41 mpg! Beat that today!
@plmn933 жыл бұрын
Just don't get in an accident....I prefer competent brakes, thanks anyway.
@erinfreize47173 жыл бұрын
Easily, with a 0-60 time three seconds quicker, and I can actually stop when I need to!
@pl56243 жыл бұрын
@@erinfreize4717 most cars today dont average 41 mpg....and a prius might be the only answer.
@mattt1986543213 жыл бұрын
My 2010 prius will beat this in every way shape and form.
@oambrosia3 жыл бұрын
@@mattt198654321 but no 5-speed LOL
@drdankify3 жыл бұрын
Would love to have a Rampage to play with...
@testmcgee92303 жыл бұрын
“...it literally beats you to death...” That’s, arguably, a bad thing.
@dodgeguyz3 жыл бұрын
4:26. And so begins the race for most cup holders!
@kcindc55393 жыл бұрын
College roommate had one of these. I drove it on occasion and actually liked it. It felt like quicker than my Honda at the time. And I kinda liked the fact it was a little rough around the edges
@kirkpatrick843 жыл бұрын
got my smokes and a cuppa joe
@tonychavez20833 жыл бұрын
Love those lil 2.2 mopars, my pops had one in his 85 Reliant K , simple and durable mills.
@markusantonio48663 жыл бұрын
Click, click, click lifters. Yeah I miss those cars.
@thatoneguy67763 жыл бұрын
whew... a neck snapping 94 HP i remember buying the 1986 Dodge Daytona Turbo Z........146hp it was considered a beast, competing with camaro, and firebird...... 0 - 60 mph was 8 seconds
@snappy4523 жыл бұрын
An extra glove box for your Salem lung darts.
@earnedmystripes23822 жыл бұрын
The goddamn trunk got wet due to bad fit and finish. It's amazing what we put up with in that era. My dad bought an '84 Dodge Ram that had to go back to the dealer because the passenger door was so out of adjustment that you could see daylight at the top from inside the cab.
@billgateskilledmyuncle232 жыл бұрын
The guy took his cap off so he could talk to the camera. I remember it was culture to take your hat off anytime you entered a building, but not outside while talking to a camera. LOL
@shept.77363 жыл бұрын
Imagine a Dodge Charger based rampage today
@dragonbutt3 жыл бұрын
I feel like the handling complaints are unwarranted. It looked very stable and sharp. That braking tho lol
@ThinkHarder3 жыл бұрын
i had one exactly like this except a horizon, and it was so fuel efficient for a 20 years old beater, i miss her so much , she was comfy
@otsenres16363 жыл бұрын
We went from this to a 4 door...lol
@re86723 жыл бұрын
We *went* to this!
@misterbuklau40533 жыл бұрын
@@re8672 In my opinion if it had a rwd v8 it wouldve worked.
@wolfsburvviann3 жыл бұрын
and the 4 door is 10x better
@AbronHawkins3 жыл бұрын
From a 4 cylinder to Hemi V8 powah!!!!
@basshead.3 жыл бұрын
@@AbronHawkins Fake Hemi*
@325xitgrocgetter3 жыл бұрын
Our family had the 81 Plymouth TC3 version of this platform..with the 1.7 VW based four cylinder and the automatic.....had the same propensity to swap ends on heavy braking...even worse on snowy or icy surfaces...this was one of the cars I learned how to drive as a teen and it probably helped my driving skills......
@CamaroAmx3 жыл бұрын
Never had that issue with mine. Maybe they fixed it by 86.
@tomj44063 жыл бұрын
My dad had a black & gold one, an '82. i took my driver test in it & yes it had a 4spd manual :) Nice looking & handling & fabulous running car. He traded it in on a garnet red '85 Daytona, 2.2L 5 spd. That car went over 200k on the original clutch! And just about everything else. He drove it, i drove it a year, my bro drove it & he sold it with 200k on it. This is all in Wisc mind you & it wasn't even rusted out beyond use..far from it. he did a head gasket at 100k as preventive maintenance. But we drove that car decent..did not abuse/neglect it. Proper oil change intervals, etc and the few things we replaced were Mopar or OEM grade or better.
@andyl9920Ай бұрын
I found an 82 charger 2.2. Debating if i want to buy it. $3,500. Never worked on 1 so that is my only concern. Do they have vaccuum leaks?
@mrdaykurutakuchannel3 жыл бұрын
I love this charger TBH, just put the SRT4's drivetrain and it's good.
@stevee83183 жыл бұрын
That fake hood scoop is embarrassing. Along with the panel gap so bad it let the cargo compartment get wet
@christineayres70943 жыл бұрын
This would cost a fortune to insure in the UK where i am from and the worst thing is a 1.2 litre car will go just as fast and handle better too LOL
@JDMHaze3 жыл бұрын
this charger was dodge's "Mustang II" lmaoo😂😂😂😂
@bikingD3 жыл бұрын
Not really. The Shelby GLHS version of this car was a serious car. Never did a Mustang II ever have any performance versions other then decal packages.
@kz1000ps3 жыл бұрын
Aim for the stars, baby!!
@bikingD3 жыл бұрын
@@kz1000ps 0 to 60 in under 7 seconds for the GLHS version in the 1980's was fast. If you look at some true 1960's muscle car test that version would keep up and would be faster then my 85 Trans am I had. That said I think the Shelby GLHS version was a a great car and that is from a guy who drives a new Charger Daytona.
@kz1000ps3 жыл бұрын
@@bikingD Ah, my reply was aimed at the initial comment. But yes, sub-7 seconds in the 1980s was nothing to sneeze at.
@weedmastersr3 жыл бұрын
This was faster and got better gas mileage though.
@mcqueenfanman3 жыл бұрын
I love Craig's response.
@gtpcruiser023 жыл бұрын
I had the new 1979 Dodge Omni 024 with the 4 speed 65 HP Voltswagen 4 cylinder. Engine that ran smooth but the slowest car I ever drove. Top speed was 80 MPH at 4000 RPM and the engine was screaming. Had to crazy glue the body side moldings on every six months or they would fall off. Rack & Pinion steering, Disc Brakes, Air Cond, 4 Speaker Motorola Sound System, Paint Finish were all pluses on this car. Everything else was inferior junk. Body fit and cheap plastic interior were terrible. Drove it for six years 90 thousand miles and the only parts that failed were Battery, Alternator, Radiator. Reliable for a cheaply built Low Tech car.
@05gtdriver3 жыл бұрын
Drips Oil Drops Grease Everywhere
@nergispaul90223 жыл бұрын
Had the same car. As I remember with the vw engine if you wanted to pass going uphill you had to switch off a/c. The 2.2 I had later was far better.
@randykroells80493 жыл бұрын
I also had one, it was always acting up and the body was falling apart at 3years old.
@herrgolf3 жыл бұрын
That’s quite quick for the era and still entertaining today
@frankburns88713 жыл бұрын
I had an '83 Shelby Charger. It was a lot of fun, but yeah, a ton of torque steer. And I had no idea how crazy the braking was. I never had to lock them up, but if this display is typical, that's a very good thing. Wow.
@chrisfreemesser57073 жыл бұрын
That homemade Motorweek sweat shirt on the one staff member!
@SolamenteVees3 жыл бұрын
So you like the shifter or no... 😆 2:22
@robertburton80553 жыл бұрын
I just hope this really underlines to everyone how much of a Golden era we are currently in with cars.
@petervitti9Ай бұрын
We had a new 1989 plymouth reliant with similar bucket seats- most comfortable seats to this day.
@RandomGuyDan3 жыл бұрын
I had one of these in black in 1992. It was a fun little car by the standards of the day.
@jamesgarlitz28123 жыл бұрын
I have 2 87 and 84 loved them both. I want to get a new one and replace the engine. The higher end seats were super comfortable.
@buickboy923 жыл бұрын
MotorWeek, please bring back those awesome "MotorWeek" sweatshirts (sweaters?). Would love to have one. Totally rad. 😎
@compu853 жыл бұрын
Have you thought of bringing back the “from the drivers seat” segment? I really like it!
@MrBigA943 жыл бұрын
This video was absolutely hilarious 😂😂😂
@Snake-ms7sj3 жыл бұрын
My 1986 Dodge Omni GLH's 2.2L put out 110 hp. so a 16 hp increase over this 83. 0-60 mph in 8.5 secs. Topped out at 110 mph. All GLH's only came with a 5 speed manual.
@mikeyveloster76152 жыл бұрын
This Charger 2.2 model was originally called the Omni 024 and is a fastback version of the Omni 4-door hatchback
@gulfy093 жыл бұрын
At least they kept it 2 door unlike todays chargers
@rockcrawler31193 жыл бұрын
Imagine being able to take a new Charger Redeye back in time for these guys to see!
@glennvernes8305 Жыл бұрын
I had an '85, silver over black with red interior. Three things I remember are: flaccid steering, rubbery shifting, and a surprisingly pimped-out interior. Chrysler splurged on the inside parts because it was the cheapest way to make the car better.
@emeyer69633 жыл бұрын
How about the review on that 83' LTD in the backround at the test track?
@cadesmith57263 жыл бұрын
The late 70's and early 80's were the dark ages of the automobile
@Vicus_of_Utrecht10 ай бұрын
Yet more of those cars on the road than all 90s to '05. See more 80s LeBarons than 90s Civics & Corollas
@oldguy20823 жыл бұрын
These weren't as bad as some, but the shifter mechanism were famous for wearing out and coming loose without warning; at least day there are up grades for the shift linkage that fix the willowy feel of the stock up. The brakes would take some work, an adjustable brake portioning valve and removing the self adjuster set up would help a lot. Sadly, no fix for the lousy plastics on Chrysler products that crack and break often.. got a Dodge generation 2 Ram, everything plastic has either cracked or broken including the seat back adjuster handle!
@Doobie19753 жыл бұрын
acceleration times were actually very good for 1983 4 cylinder engine standards, I didn't expect to see this car break the 0-60mph times in under 10 seconds, the average mpg is also even better than the 1982 cousin model the Plymouth TC3 with the 1.7 liter 4 cylinder.
@Hotlog693 жыл бұрын
In a world of Crossovers and SUVs. This is what we need today, to save us from 2020.
@robs9324Ай бұрын
The braking was awesome and very thrilling
@elilevine24103 жыл бұрын
My girlfriend had 1 , it was more fun than the carolla ! Love the coffee cup!
@andyl9920Ай бұрын
I found a clean 1982 charger 2.2. Wish there were more videos on YT. Need maintenance and car repair videos. Is this vehicle carburetor? Is it hard to work on? Are maintenance cheap?
@TheGbeecherАй бұрын
I would guess carburetor...the 2.2 four cylinder had a good reputation for reliability and ease of maintenance...
@Microjoey023 жыл бұрын
This model Features the "shart pack!"
@Butchcub7510 ай бұрын
IDK John, looks like its doing the slalom pretty well.
@albear9723 жыл бұрын
3:35 Daaaaang! That comment was funny as heck! 🤣😂🤣 Gawd! The late 70's to the early 80's were truly horrific years for US cars. Seriously, a Dodge Charger derived from an Omni subcompact? Which was derived from A Vauxhall, from a Simca-Talbot? Awful times those were. People today don't know how good they have it with modern cars. Yup, I remember seeing those atrocities as a teen back then and thought they were pretty bad.
@pl56243 жыл бұрын
Jim wangers came up with the charger 2.2s graphics...
@rjherche3 жыл бұрын
he was impressed af by the cup holder
@GyroPyro1212123 жыл бұрын
This was considered quick for it’s time. Oh how things have changed.
@Cobra39019 ай бұрын
The 💩💩we used to put up with. I was a auto mechanic back then and it was a real treat trying to get any car from that era to run good. And of all the cars,the Chrysler products were the worst. Vacuum hoses and thermostatic switches galore and a carburetor you couldn’t legally adjust except for idle speed. I would try selling them a carburetor overhaul and if it had anywhere near 40,000 mi or more it always needed the crappy rubber carb base gasket that they used (severe vacuum leaks) and then I was allowed to unplug the mixture screws and adjust idle mixture. Several customers said that it ran the best ever since they owned it. I guess one thing to take into consideration is you could get one of those 💩-boxes for 6-7grand brand new in 83-84….hard to find a decent used vehicle that doesn’t have a jillion miles on it for that much nowadays…hard to find anything new for under 20. 🙄
@andyl9920Ай бұрын
Found an 82 charger 2.2 for $3,500. With 120k miles. Pass or buy?
@GENJERM-hl5tk3 жыл бұрын
I love that cigerette glove box hahaha.
@auxiliary3 жыл бұрын
I had a 84 and at the time it was 10 years old. Was in great shape and had hood pins on it. People thought had a sleeper engine. What they didn’t know was the hood latch was broke and someone decided to put hood pins in it.
@CamaroAmx3 жыл бұрын
I did the same thing with my Dakota when the hood latch broke. Put on a glass pack just to keep the theme.
@roddydykes70533 жыл бұрын
Imagine putting this side by side with the ‘69 Hemi 😂 did car manufacturers even realize how pathetic their post-fuel crisis cars were?
@MikeJBlues Жыл бұрын
1983 I purchased a brand new plymouth turismo 2.2. 5 speed, gray with red interior. Wish I still had it.
@herman4523 жыл бұрын
My first new car was a 1982 Charger 2.2. My trade-in was a 73 Duster 340. Dumbest trade I ever made, and the Charger 2.2 was the second worst car I ever owned (worst was an Opel GT). Clunky shifter was an understatement, power was mediocre even for 1982, 4-speed transmission was weak, replacement 5-speed wasn't much better, and then it started vapor locking under full power halfway through second gear. Gave it to my stepdaughter after I got it paid for and bought a slant six 67 Barracuda. Drove that car 100,000 miles in four years with the slant, then swapped in a 360. Still have the Barracuda 33 years later, wouldn't be afraid to fire it up and go off on a cross-country drive w/o any preparation whatever.
@bwxmoto3 жыл бұрын
I had the 2.2L Shelby Turbo. Fun little car!! -especially back then when cars were mostly so terrible.
@kbozz713 жыл бұрын
lol The guy @ 5:27 looks like Hank from the movie National Security!
@tint6613 жыл бұрын
I was in the Army and stationed in Germany In the early 80's. You could buy a Dodge Charger 2.2 for $4995 and have it waiting for you back in the states when you left Germany. Ford Escort had the same type of deal. The shifter feel was crappy if best on these cars. The 2.2 liter motor was better than the 1.7 and 1.8 liter motors Dodge and Plymouth got from VW and were putting in these and the 4 door cars.
@TheCarCrazyGuy3 жыл бұрын
Imagine if they brought this back as the new Charger. People would lose their minds. 😂
@RC_928 Жыл бұрын
What Ford was trying to do with the Ford Probe
@TheCarCrazyGuy Жыл бұрын
@@RC_928 yep
@richierich3963 жыл бұрын
My friend bought a new one in the fall of '83. Who would've thought, at the time, Chargers would be front wheel drive and have a 4 cylinder.
@LTV_inc3 жыл бұрын
Yes I had an new 83 Shelby, put 180k miles on it over 10 years with just a head gasket and a few alternators. I loved that car. It handled so well it was scary on west Marin/Sonoma roads. I traded it on a new 94 Mustang.
@vivaportugalhabs3 жыл бұрын
That braking is indeed scary
@johnjones3933 жыл бұрын
A friend in high school drove an 86 Charger. I hated the car, so did he, but today it would be cool drive one to Cars and Coffee.
@KRN7623 жыл бұрын
Pack of Salems??
@brentmassingale21613 жыл бұрын
& a cup o coffee...."I'm good!"😆
@kennyj2043 жыл бұрын
Can’t even get menthols in Canada now! I miss the cool refreshing taste and the way they really opened up my sinuses.
@0554joe3 жыл бұрын
kennyj204 you can’t get menthols at all in Canada???
@berkinerengurman14013 жыл бұрын
kennyj204 you can get them from duty free shops
@kennyj2043 жыл бұрын
Joseph Woda no they are illegal in Canada along with 100’s. We now have plain packaging too.
@arodtoolong3453 жыл бұрын
I'll never understand how these era cars were ever looked at as I'm gonna spend thousands of dollars for these cars
@Infinitrium3 жыл бұрын
"Chrysler's quattro motor" I blinked then I had to think about it for a solid 30 seconds before I got it..I think
@Legend-oka3 жыл бұрын
Great America Cars, stay long live retro America cars
@spg56582 ай бұрын
Great looking car back then.
@rubbersoul37233 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the post-the evolution that Chrysler went through in the Iaccocca era was never boring.
@JDRoss7163 жыл бұрын
“1/4 in 18 seconds.” Lmao!! Son.....mah chest!!!
@landonbenford83694 ай бұрын
I truly believe that today's vehicles with their 1,000 safety systems give the drivers a false sense of security. Us Generation Nexters learned how to drive without all that stuff so we know what limitations are. Everytime it snows here in Chicago the first vehicle you see in the ditch is a 4x4.
@bengaljam45503 жыл бұрын
Owned one of these 1983-1988. Pretty much a throw away car at 100,000 miles. The carburetor would gunk up every 10,000 miles to the point where you would have to completely take apart and clean. It was actually cheaper just to get a new carburetor installed. Car was very cheaply made. Lots of plastic. I guess it did it's job for the most part the 5 years I owned it. Could have been worse. I believe I payed around $6500 brand new. In 1988 I bought a Honda accord which was a definite upgrade. Drove it for 15 years and 250,000 miles.
@bengaljam4550 Жыл бұрын
Pretty much exactly what I went through. Bought Charger new in 1982. Carburetor gunked up on me too every 10,000 miles. Other than that it did its job I guess until 1989 when I bought a new Honda accord.
@mr.boostang20643 жыл бұрын
At least it has good coffee cup holders
@oambrosia3 жыл бұрын
That's a big deal in the 80's!
@4jp3 жыл бұрын
Who wouldn't want an uncovered mug of an extremely hot beverage splashing about everywhere as they drive?
@oambrosia3 жыл бұрын
@@4jp I recall growing up my friend's mom had an 80's Cavalier. She'd give us a ride to school on her way to work. The cupholders were little more than indentations in the glove box door. I was happy to not be sitting up front!
@landonbenford83694 ай бұрын
Someone said those shallow @$$ cupholders were probably meant to be used during breaks and lunches.