2.0L Turbo vs 3.6L Jeep Wrangler JL Which is better? Part 1 Road Test 0-60 mph

[@JohnAhladis]

After driving both, the V6 was fine. But I was actually very impressed by the 2.0T. It was faster, quicker, better in general to drive, especially considering the majority of the time you are going to be driving on roads and in traffic.

[@gabrieldalcomune3044]

Bought a 2.0 and didn't really expect much from it, I'm much happier with it than having driven 3.6 JLs. Boosting around town and chugging along under 1.5k rpms means the e torque helps it and it just sips fuel.

[@Reptileman110]

@@gabrieldalcomune3044 So you're happier having gone with the 2.0 as compared to the V6 then?

[@wiltonhenriquez6613]

Reptileman110 yes I would like to know the answer as well thinking of getting the turbo

[@gabrieldalcomune3044]

@@Reptileman110 I'm absolutely happier than I would have been getting the v6, I like higher revving motors usually, but the torque around town is amazing. Not to mention averaging 22mpg a tank mixed driving.

[@gabrieldalcomune3044]

@@wiltonhenriquez6613 I would drive both, but I really love it. Very zippy motor. Although depending on how you drive, and the trans ecu learns your driving you might be frustrated with slow gear kick downs in certain scenarios. But that's something specific to the auto trans.

[@nukejr555]

I know the mods are minor but I think they should have tested completely stock and THEN retested with selected mods and compare all four measurements. Just too many variables for an objective assessment.

[@CJBroncoF150]

See if the 2 minor mods help out the V6 in part when we take them to the dyno 😜

[@MrYaxalot]

i doubt a catback and a intake helped a naturally aspirated v6 a whole lot the biggest thing is the 35's bumpers and stuff

[@chrisfisher8266]

This is the dumbest comparison, mods vs no mods

[@scottstrang8347]

I agree, w CAI and exhaust......it's possible you could get upwards of 10- 20 wheel hp.....maybe less but you could definitely feel that in the seat! Therefore , I feel the test is not valid in my opinion. I completely understand the point of it as their only quote minor mods ...... But those two mods together you can definitely feel a difference I say this from experience in my own cars. It's not drastic but it is a difference.

[@waltscrossfiresrt6]

Intake kexhaust and tune is at minimum 20 wheel hp definitely not a fair test a modded jeep vs a stock jeep

[@SteveCrainMusic]

The problem with this test, as many, is that it's done at sea level. If you come up to altitude, in Colorado, where we START tests at 5500 feet and take them to 12,000 feet above sea level, is that the 3.2l V-6 is almost gutless at altitude. In contrast, the 2l turbo will easily do 90 mph at 12,000 feet - and do it without hesitation and with aplomb.

[@CJBroncoF150]

I think that sounds like a good excuse to go to colorado!

[@joeriley353]

I live in Moab Utah. The jeeping mecca of the world. I have owned and spent lots of time in modified 3.6 jks. I have also spent time behind the wheel of modified 3.6 JLs.All Rubicons. I recently got to spend time behind the wheel of a 2.0 turbo on 37s. With the stock 4.10 gears. It flat impressed me. It is the personal JLU of the owner of one of the biggest jeep rental / guide business in the West. The owner has a fleet of JLs. And the pick of what to drive for her personal use. She drives the 2.0 for a reason. It makes those 37s feel stock. A 3.6 does not. It also works great at slow speed rock crawling. Thanks in part to the electric motor helping the turbo at low rpms . I ask her how is the gas mileage. She said she's to busy drag race 3.6 jeeps to care. I have been waiting for the JLU diesel. I am seriously considering scrapping that plan and getting the Turbo, because when the tunes come out for it, this thing's gonna rip .

[@armandcouture4655]

Joe Riley see that is what I am thinking as well, in my choice of JL engine! Now coming from folks that have much experience in the Jeep community this is swaying my decision and confirming my hunch on which way to go! It is just that 48 volt battery underneath that is the only concern. How will the turbo hold up over time, especially if off roading.

[@OlympusReptiles]

@@JG-od3xy that is EXACTLY what I did. No looking back

[@eyeofhoruswadjet4236]

Definitely not talking about Nena at Barlow, lol...

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks for the feedback!!!

[@sinepari9160]

still waiting on those tunes?

[@Northrendish]

testing a 0-60 starting from turning on a corner is just a waste of a test

[@CJBroncoF150]

0-60 in a jeep is already a laughable offense haha

[@AC7880]

@@CJBroncoF150 So you made it worse by starting with a turn??

[@nathanthomforde5079]

It looks like he started it on a turn but the speed goes down to zero after he turns then he pins it

[@cartermackenzie1135]

I swear my 2.0t is about a second quicker than that, and other tests have shown otherwise too

[@youtubetv1588]

@@CJBroncoF150 you’re a special kind of stupid

[@nelsonss3200]

If you live in a very high city way over sea level like we have here in Mexico , the jeep V6 will lost so much power like 80 HP while the turbo lost like 40 HP , I think on that situation being over 2000 ft sea level the turbo JL will definitely feel much more powerful

[@DECDEC1220]

I test drove both the 2.0t and the 3.6 with the 8 speed auto back to back. Not just once but three times. Both jeeps were equally loaded. The 2.0t pulled significantly harder and easily beat the 3.6 to 60. The only thing better about the 3.6 was engine sound.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Great point, thanks for watching!

[@JorJor812]

Flowmasters on it sound amazing!

[@streetfighter398]

@@JG-od3xy the 3.6 is proven besides the fact that it likes to eat lifters

[@TheSavage3.6]

the 3.6 is also far more reliable and can be supercharged.

[@SomeOne-ce1gf]

Turbo all day

[@eyeofhoruswadjet4236]

As far as long term mod-ability, the aftermarket support for the 2.0 is great. With an intercooler pipe, tuner, exhaust and pedal commander, I can run 37's without regearing and still pull very strong off the line.

[@TheV8Hooligan]

Hmm. I’ll I can say is I drove both bone stock from the dealer. The turbo was the best choice. Lots of get up and go and with the e torque you don’t need premium fuel but it give you more power.

[@Ryan-1337]

I probably do 60% Highway, 40% city stop and go and my 2021 2 door Wrangler sport with the 3.6 is giving me a combined range of 22 to 24 MPG. I really am pleasantly surprised by the fuel economy for the NA V6. Course its a different story when I take it out to the mountains and trails. But still nice to be able to have that kind of fuel economy with a capable rig.

[@josephwhiskeybeale]

I really expected more from the turbo, but I have to say I’d probably go for the tried and true V6 anyway.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Same boat here, i've got the 3.6 in my JK. -Matt

[@pablomax3045]

@@CJBroncoF150 so.. someone bought the v6, therefore it isn't allowed to be worse. I guess that's why when your co-driver said it felt exactly the same to him, you said.. yeah, but I'm going to give it to the V6. Maybe it just "sounds" faster to you?

[@sbiruli]

Look with attention...he give power too late with the 20l turbo when already two seconds are passed...in the real time 20l turbo 0-60 is in 7.5 seconds

[@30smsuperstrat]

Go drive them. They're night and day. The 4 cylinder is much quicker, and torque just crushes the 6. It has less when you're above 60 and mash it.

[@lancebangwell]

If you're going to mod the engine, the turbo will give you more headroom to modify, I wonder if that i4 can run flexfuel... The NA V6 maybe a few hp with bolt on mods.

[@whiteelk427]

All good comments, but here it is. Turbo was jerky in the 2.0 and I didn't feel the comfort was there. But the 3.6 felt like a smoova, you know the heavy iron she hit him with. That turbo is like country or rap, nice for the youngster, but the 3.6 is for those of us that love the blues. I'm getting a smoova. 3.6🤗👍

[@fuhjk502]

The difference in performance is very close. But if you look at both on a dyno the V6 has a much more consistent output of torque. And the new Eboost electric motor adds even more torque to the V6 when you need it. For the street not a big deal but for off road that's what you want. Also the Pentastar V6 is a bullet proof dependable motor that's been out for years in many different vehicles. The 4 banger turbo has not proved itself and turbos are expensive when they go bad. I spent the extra money for the V6 it's worth it.

[@Ferda1964]

I will say that most of guys and some girls that have at least some limited knowledge of engine mechanics will go for the 3.6 L. Those that always crave the newest and most modern will go for turbo.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Good point for sure

[@emgeesea3983]

I have a 2020 2-door JL, and have to disagree with many of the 2.0 enthusiasts here. When buying my JL, I test drove both engines, in identically equipped 2-door Willys JLs. I had intended to buy the 2.0 when on my way to the dealership, but after test driving, the 2.0 just seemed weaker to me - like it had to try harder to accelerate, maintain highway speed, etc. The 3.6, in contrast, felt like it pulled effortlessly all the time. Just my opinion, but I ended up buying the Willys with the 3.6. (I would agree that at elevations high above sea level the turbo would have an advantage, but at sea level I'm not so sure.) But, we all have our opinions, which is what makes social media the annoying medium that is! ;)

[@RayGreen94510]

I have a 21 2 door Rubicon with the 2.0 turbo and thoroughly enjoy the low rpm torque. The majority of driving is in town and in city traffic so this is where this type of performance shines.

[@Nick-os3ue]

I have driven the 2 and the turbo feels way faster then the V6

[@chappy187]

Same. Drove two Saharas exactly the same except the engine. The 2.0t felt way faster and had much more torque than the V6

[@williamhernandez8526]

@@chappy187 I actually own the turbo version and drove them back to back with the V6. Way more torque with the 2.0T. Maybe they were using 89 octane gas or something.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Interesting, i felt that the v6 had some more power low end!

[@cedricolivera4989]

I have had a 2014 JKU Rubicon V6 and now a 2018 JLU Rubicon 2.0 turbo. I drove both 2018 JLU V6 and 2018 JLU 2.0. And the JLU is way faster than the JKU and the 2.0 is way faster than the V6

[@pablomax3045]

Did you notice the 5mpg difference between the two? That is 4000 bucks over 50k miles at current fuel prices. Looks like the 2.0 pays for itself. Of course, you go slightly slower on your 0-60, which apparently is why people buy wranglers.

[@docholliday6285]

3.6 hands down. Proven. Add to that longevity over a turbo.

[@CJBroncoF150]

The 3.6 is a great engine!

[@one100billneoone4]

My 2005 RubiHara LJ (726 of 1000) has the 4.0 with 6 speed. Good power and still feels great. Completely stock and will never be modified. Love that 4.0L il6 engine. In my opinion I think the 4.0L is better overall.

[@CJBroncoF150]

4.0L is one of the best engines ever made!

[@WestCoastJeeper]

@@CJBroncoF150 totally agree! Miss my TJ due to the 4.0! Always wanted an LJ but only ever saw one for sale over here in the UK! Have had a 2.8 Diesel JKU for 11 years now! but looking to change it for a 3.6 JKU, impossible to get a 3.6 JLU over here unless I import one. Great videos by the way @CJ Off-Road!

[@mixflip]

How is a turbo engine off road and rock crawling? I know cooling is important for turbos. Rock crawling probably doesn't help keep them turbos cool at all Im guessing. Would need very strong and reliable electric fans.

[@DimplesChild401]

The fans kick on as needed to keep it cool.

[@mixflip]

@@DimplesChild401 I saw a video from the rubicon trail. Those new jeep cooling fans were insanely loud when rock crawling at 1mph.

[@tonimathias-grumley6631]

WTF? Air intake and other mods on the V6 comparing to a stock eTorque? Not a correct comparison at all.

[@josephkool8411]

Air intake aint gonna do nothing without a tune. it might even slow it down.

[@monsterpoo]

@@josephkool8411 intake+ exhaust will add power without a tune... the ecu will change timing in the fly for minor mods like that , its not like you're adding forced induction and huge power to where the stock ECU cant compensate enough for all the extra compressed air the intake+ exhaust on that 3.6L probably added 10-20 hp, so while may not sound like a lot but on a 285 hp motor that's about 4-7% increase in power.... enough to make the review not apples to apples

[@serkanister3620]

Why I feeling you bias towards 3.6?

[@user-fl4wn9dn2c]

when they make a chip for the turbo it will add about 90 hp.

[@CJBroncoF150]

I'm not trust me!

[@muhammadwahidy4684]

@@user-fl4wn9dn2c got only 30hp out of it

[@user-fl4wn9dn2c]

@@muhammadwahidy4684 well that was less than I hoped for.. the 3.6 has seemingly been a good motor.

[@walden6272]

I only have experience with the 2.0L and gotta say, it's fantastic. It is very quick, faster than my toyota and still gets pretty decent gas mileage. If only it could mimic the engine sound of the V6, then it would be perfect.

[@vonrodlimpot8797]

Put borla attack exhaust

[@jaredbell174]

I have had many 4x4 and off road vehicles. I have 2 Jeep JL's and both are 2.0. Love them!

[@CJBroncoF150]

Great to hear!

[@jbivvy420]

I got a 2019 JL 2.0 and it is pretty good. No issues on most trails i've taken

[@wardholbrook1478]

I'd be interested in knowing how the two engines compare at higher elevations. Normally aspirated engines loose approximately 2.5% power per 1000' of "density" altitude. (You pilots will understand this) For those of us living in the mountain west will probably find the the 2.0L Turbo will be the engine of choice.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Good next video idea!

[@terrywaters6186]

Take the extra $1,000 the turbo 2.0 cost and put it towards putting a turbo on your 3.6 and there would be no contest.

[@beunbad]

@@terrywaters6186 so you will only have to spend another $6800-7500 then.

[@TxJK18]

Differences V6= reliable, proven easy maintenance. Turbo= unknown reliability, high maintenance, overall more expensive, complicated cooling system.

[@MrAbsentdriver]

Ivan Shabelev the 3.6 in my jeep has been a dog. The borings in the block for the heater keeps clogging up. The fix is a 1,700$ bill from the dealership. This has happened two years in a row. The turd of a jeep is for sale now. Jeep would not stand by ther product on this one. I am a jeep fan. But jeep is losing my love on this one. My opinion-3.6 is not reliable

[@TxJK18]

@@MrAbsentdriver I feel ya, bro, I have been pretty lucky with mine knock on wood, but that turbo engine is Italian made and they are not famous for being reliable, in fact FCA had a lot of issues with even fires before releasing it for sale. The Pentastar while not a Toyota engine is pretty reliable of course there are some bad troublesome units out there and then the problem is FCA being a pain to fix the issues and providing good costumer service

[@TheDevonParker]

Turbos have been common for 40 years, how do you consider them unproven or unreliable?

[@TxJK18]

@@TheDevonParker it's not the Turbo is the engine itself and the Hybrid interaction. That engine is not just a turbo engine it has a hybrid system with batteries for fuel economy

[@nukejr555]

I have had 2011 JK (3.8); 2014 JKU (3.6); & current 2018 JKU (3.6). All get light off-road duty. I really hated the sluggish 3.8 but did what it needed to. Not a single issue with the 3.6 and most of my friends have not said much either. I wish they would put a Hemi in one; there is room. I have been considering a JL to add to my toys. I am not yet sure the 4 banger is worth the price of admission. With several recalls, negligible difference in performance numbers on road and economy. I would rather spend that difference on proven engine bolt-ons. I will wait a year or two and see what improves.

[@channell11]

Stock to stock, the two engines perform very similarly, but the 2.0T gets a lot better gas mileage and has a lot more modification potential. We have a 2.0T with BSG and it's very peppy. You can definitely see the impact of bigger tires without re-gearing and the lift. Factory 2 doors with the 2.0 can get under 6 seconds to 60 and easily in mid 20s for mpg. That 8 speed does let you get away with a lot in terms of tires and gearing without paying a major price.

[@walden6272]

Agreed. I have a 2 door 2023 Jeep Wrangler with 2.0 engine and it is very fast. I did not expect a Jeep to be so fast.

[@palanthis]

The 4L straight six in the TJs was the last great engine in a Wrangler. Everything else is a compromise forced by emission and economy standards. My TJ Rubicon could literally idle up most trails in 4L 1st gear. Just let the clutch out and watch it climb. I miss that rig...

[@dougcoleburn1579]

I had a 06 Impact orange 6 speed Rubicon. What a Billy goat in 4lo!!!

[@DillyDillyBar]

The jeeps have different mods, different tires, etc. Hard to compare 0-60 40-60 etc but it was a good attempt and good info. I can tell you first hand my wifes stock Unlimited Rubicon 2.0 beat the heck out of my stock Unlimited Rubicon 3.6. You can feel the butt in seat in the 2.0 a lot more than the 3.6

[@XxAlexanderProxx]

Hi Jeff, how are they holding up? what engine would you say is doing better for you?

[@robertsoria9293]

@@XxAlexanderProxx 3.6 is going to last longer

[@biteuk]

Why is it going to last longer. The 3.6 is higher revving, so more wear and tear?

[@eyeofhoruswadjet4236]

Dude, this is a bust. Different models (unlimited vs 2dr), different mods (intake, exhaust, 35's, etc). This is conjecture. Fake news

[@mjo23dan]

Not sure if asked but why is the 2.0L not offered in manual? It defaults to automatic. When I try to do a build on Jeep’s website, manual defaults to the 3.6L.

[@spartanj2957]

Just picked up the 3.6 ,you can keep the turbo.I disconnected the stop / start you can have it too.

[@thomaswood5246]

I had the 3.6 in a 2012 and got the 3.6 in my 19. Yes, the 4 banger has power but it is working really hard or pushed hard to put out those specs. Im guessing the 4cly will not have any sort of longevity.

[@DimplesChild401]

Still pumping strong in my 2020 2.0T. Currently running 33’s on 20’s. My goal this year is to get it ready for 40’s. 7k to run it right, but it will be a beast on and off-road when I’m done.

[@spartanj2957]

I will also agree none diesel engines don't last and hold up as well with turbos.Heat is a turbos enemy too.

[@joaquinmorales3016]

My 2.0 Jeep get 8.10 sec on 37's with 4.56 gear ratios and k&n air intake, what do you think. It s a good time?

[@TrackDayVideo]

Please be sure to do same comparison with the EcoDiesel when it comes out

[@PURPLEBUTTERFLY671]

Kelly Hatcher when is that coming out

[@TrackDayVideo]

It could happen any day in new scrambler truck and JL wrangler

[@TrackDayVideo]

It could happen any day in new scrambler truck and JL wrangler

[@TrackDayVideo]

It could happen any day in new scrambler truck and JL wrangler

[@TrackDayVideo]

It could happen any day in new scrambler truck and JL wrangler

[@Xicuter84]

Jl owners manual 2.0 full synthetic oil, min 91 octane fuel, spark plugs changed every 10k miles V6 reg oil, cheap gas, spark plugs every 30k The 2.0 will cost more than the V6 and never recover any of the cost difference if you follow the manual. Personally I own the 2.0, I doubt the dealer ever read the manual otherwise I'd probably have taken the v6

[@b0lbi]

Pay close attention to oil. It must have a specific rating or you will shoot rods out

[@bankayhoodlum]

also, calculate ($/gal)/(mpg) = ($/mi) and you can see there isn’t much of a difference and that a 2 door, manual tranny v6 has tge lowest $/mi in the jeep wrangler line up

[@armandcouture4655]

Very True. I agree. Is it more fun to drive? More torque

[@Bajaheat]

Xicuter84 spark plugs every 10k? Bs lol you sure it didn’t say 100k

[@Bajaheat]

Evin Jacobs it’s not diesel...

[@mountainknife]

Am I the only one here for the fuel millage

[@gordmccann6258]

Then why did u buy a Jeep?

[@krwiles]

​​@@gordmccann6258exactly! you don't put a condom on unless you're gonna screw and you don't buy a Jeep for fuel mileage. LOL

[@SomeOne-ce1gf]

Lmao please return your jeep and let someone deserving have it go buy an Acura kid

[@hanesemail5931]

I don't know what 2.0 these guys tested but mine does 0-60 in 5.9 seconds. It is a stock 4 door Sport. I am VERY happy with it.

[@Montyhugo]

If anything? I'm thinking that the v-6 will outlast the turbo 4🤷‍♂️

[@trophyhunterssupplyllc7163]

I agree with the videos findings, the V6 feels quicker 0-60 and in passing power as well. Im glad you were able to do the test with a lift and larger tires as that’s what most end up doing to them.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks for the comment!

[@phrogusmc]

My 2.0T is much better accelerating at any RPM than my 3.6 Gladiator was. Both Jeeps running 35" tires. Acceleration on the V6 suffered greatly with the 35s. With the 2.0T, it doesn't even notice the larger tires. It drives great and passing is effortless. Also, the 2.0T can benefit more from a tune than the 3.6. I run 91-93 octane in the 2.0T. You lose power if you only run 87 in it.

[@garyvanmeter4911]

@@phrogusmc How much did the mpg drop from using 87 octane? Was the performance drop really noticeable?

[@phrogusmc]

@@garyvanmeter4911 I don't know. I've never put less than 91 in my 2.0, as that's the minimum that the manual suggests to use, as the vehicle is factory tuned for 91.

[@marceld6061]

I think the 'performance' from the 3.6 going up the hill was all 'in your ears'. If you were only doing 50 anyway, about the only difference you would get would be the sound coming out of the tailpipe. That's the difference I got from the video. You were holding a steady speed and not passing anything, so....

[@fahd3228]

Hi CJ Thanks for the content . It is a great thing Jeep is offering two engine options In general I'm a traditionalist I like NA V6 and V8 engines especially for a daily driver. The other point I want to make here is Jeep wrangler is not about going fast , If I want to go fast and really care about 0-60 times then I would get a muscle/sport car.

[@alecpupshis3512]

that exhaust sounds sweet in the V6

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks!

[@Godlovesuse4real]

I just subscribed. I love 💕 this channel. Keep up your good work 😍🥰

[@rgs455atw]

What is the gas milage comparison? Around town and on the highways? Since the i4 requires premium gas, which is more expensive, do you really save any money by by going with the i4?

[@CJBroncoF150]

MPG test is coming soon!

[@drewthompson7457]

I have a different brand 2L turbo. It was rated on regular fuel, premium not needed. For fuel economy, I once saw 1.5 mpg when I floored with a 3500 lb trailer, going up a steep hill. I have also managed 35 mpg going to a friend's cottage. ( Mostly highway but some gravel roads).

[@justinhardt1]

Tune, Intake and exhaust and the 2.0L will be a beast. Tune is key for turbos.

[@CJBroncoF150]

That's what i'm hearing!

[@TheBudgetAquarist]

A turbo is just another thing to break and when I want to race I don't jump in my jeep! The 3.6 moves just fine!

[@PKDesigns2011]

would like to have seen mpg difference as well, how well they suck up fuel going up this hill ...

[@kpfalconi]

Is the gearing for both the same? That would definitely make a difference in 0 to 60 acceleration.

[@phrogusmc]

Even if they were the same gearing, the 2.0t makes 47lbs-ft more torque to the wheels than the 3.6 does and only 6rwhp less, when dyno'd side-by-side. There's a video here on youtube of 2 identical stock JL's (3.6 and 2.0t) pulling dyno runs. I've owned a 3.6 JT and now 2.0t JLUR, and we also have a 3.6 JKUR. The 2.0t just outshines the 3.6 in acceleration. And all of them were/are on 35s. The 2.0 still pulls hard with the larger tires and builds speed quickly.

[@slscamg]

I think the best part about this is that the Jeep has two really great power trains to choose from. Go test drive a forerunner with the 4 L and the five speed in the jeep feels like a rocket shipping comparison. My money is on the 3.6 just because if it’s track record, the 2.0t has had some oil consumption issues in the Alfas and as much as Jeep says you can run regular 87 in the turbo, when it gets really hot outside, you can definitely feel it start to pull timing and then you’re stuck with the expensive premium fuel.

[@Adam_Newman]

My cousin has a 2019 2.0l with 34000 miles and no issues as of yet

[@CJBroncoF150]

thats awesome

[@Kschnabs14]

I love CJ and most their uploads. I’ve owned a 5.0 GTPP and supported them. I drove the V6 and 2.0T Wrangler back to back. The 2.0T felt way BETTER. I refused to trade my modded 5.0 for the V6 but I’m more than happy with my 2.0T after 6700 miles. CJ I feel is not running the 2.0T on 93 octane or fanboying the V6. I’ll continue to watch them but I feel this review is completely wrong

[@CJBroncoF150]

Dang, well i own a v6 however i enjoy driving the 4 cylinder on the trail, this review was just my opinion, so it can be interpreted!

[@Kschnabs14]

Wasn’t meant to be an attack. Either way if you are in the V6 or the 2.0T, end of the day you are in a Jeep and you made the right choice

[@taxi615]

I liked the 2L T more and when tuning is going to be available it will kill that boring V6. I wish they put a better V6 in the Jeeps FCA have so many options that using that 7 year old engine is denying the potential Wranglers could have. Having all that extra torque makes more sense as not many people are raving out the V6 to get all the 285 hp it's putting out. That V6 is so slow under 5000 rpm.

[@CJBroncoF150]

The 2.0 will be great once more tuning is available!

[@oliversattler3173]

2 sec from 0 to 10 mph in the Turbo vs under 1 sec from 0-10 mph in the V6. A little brake torque and the Turbo would be gone.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Hmmm.. that sounds like a good idea for a future video!

[@alejandromaclean3666]

I'm so happy i got the turbo, so much FUN

[@CJBroncoF150]

Great choice!!

[@qualitysteamcarpetcleaning1710]

Do you have to put premium gas in it to get that extra HP and torque

[@alejandromaclean3666]

@@qualitysteamcarpetcleaning1710 I always use premium gas and it runs great. 👍

[@brodiwheeler7583]

No discussion of the E-Torque??? No discussion of the required or recommended grade of fuel for the turbo???

[@juanticimo]

This is an interesting video in many ways. I drove both the 3.6 and the 2.0T before ultimately buying the 2.0T. They were actually very close in comparison when i drove them. I wonder if the 2.0T in this video was using 87 or premium unleaded. If i put 87 in my 2.0T its quite a bit slower, and this seems like how it would be. The 2.0T was faster than the 3.6 when i drove them back to back, so thats kind of puzzling. Not only that but a lot of other reviews show that the 2.0T was faster.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Its definitely a close comparison!

[@khyoon14]

They used 87 no doubt. Dumbasses

[@DimplesChild401]

Turbo definitely performs better with Premium Fuel.

[@dannyperrino5308]

First time I ever saw a 0-60 test based only on “I think the 3.6 felt faster”. Wondering if you are aware that you can actually use a timer.

[@CJBroncoF150]

We did use a timer through our editting, and i was right once the results came in!

[@mikeeast8322]

Drove both and got the 3.6 manual.

[@speedtriprr537]

I never planned to ever own a Jeep but after driving this turbo Jeep on vacation this week I am sold. I loved the engine then taking the doors off and the roof I couldn’t deny how great the Jeep is.

[@Mark-iz5in]

any regrets with not getting a manual?

[@speedtriprr537]

@@Mark-iz5in it’s a jeep

[@GodRam1988]

I like the v6 a lot it’s a great engine and take to boost extremely well! Look up ripp supercharges on the 3.6 so much potential from pentastar

[@CJBroncoF150]

I had a ripp kit on my JK and absolutely loved it!

[@hedydd2]

The four cylinder seemed much quieter. How do these things perform in crash tests? How would I be after sliding it at 30mph into a tree on the trail?

[@CJBroncoF150]

Idk about 30 mph on the trail into a tree, but they hold up pretty well!

[@1titans]

Isnt torqur more important for off roading. New to it, just asking, aeems like it would be

[@CJBroncoF150]

Yes torque is very important off-roading, it is what allows you to get up harder obstacles with less power!

[@Spoolingturbski]

The 2.0 turbo was way better for everyday driving. It was a literal rocket ship. The V6 felt lethargic in comparison

[@cordellej]

3.0l turbocharged v6 diesel and a 6 speed manual then ill buy one

[@rocketman3776]

cordellej how about a 5.9L Cummins....

[@seanhenry8030]

@@rocketman3776 The 5.9 is great, but it sorta misses the point. I'm with 3 liter turbo manual guy on this one. I'd probably still buy it in auto if it was the only option, provided it was a durable, high gear count unit.

[@rjhaney804]

They've already released that they will NOT be offering a manual with the 3.0 diesel. Which makes me sad.

[@taxi615]

It would make sense putting the Mercedes 3L diesel but that would bring these jeeps over 70K lol. I predict in 5 years only doctors will be able to afford a jeep. in the last 10 years jeeps have gone up by 7000$ I remember when you could buy a sport for 21K new now they are 34K and you have less options to choose from. A Rubicon was 38K it's ridiculous.

[@CJBroncoF150]

We would too!

[@yodhin79]

Why does the screen show the 2.0 L is only averaging 10.6 mpg at 4:42 ?

[@magnum8608]

Takeaway - 3.6 better all around since it was in a heavier JLU.

[@rivett40]

Mine is the 2020 2.0 it moves pretty good I’m also factory tires and wheels I won’t be going over 33son it

[@Mightymerc1]

Maybe I missed it, but I was hoping for some real world MPG numbers. My JK has the 3.6 and my fuel economy sucks. Can you cover that in the next episode?

[@CJBroncoF150]

Yes, MPGs will be in a future episode 😎

[@TheSchmed]

I’m getting about 14 mpg driving locally, 2016 Wrangler Unlim 75th Anniversary.

[@stevenp3176]

Driving a brick with a 4x4 drivetrain is always going to suck on MPGs. Nothing on the JL is going to make a meaningful difference. Is what it is.

[@daveyoung465]

You missed the part where the v6 has exhaust and cool air intake

[@eda7875]

I have a 2door JL with the 8 speed auto. I get 24-27 MPG highway. 18-22 city. 25 and 26 is what i get most commonly on the highway, and 21 is the most common city. Just accelerate slowly. Stock AT tires. his is not bad at all for a jeep wrangler. If you raise it and put bigger mud tires youll drop MPGs considerably. The JL is NOT a brick, they put some effort to make it more aerodynamic and I notice a huge differencr from the JK. The wrangler JL is to me the best jeep ever made, and I am sorry for all the italian haters out there. I think the turbo engine is a bold innovative move and quite awesome, but I still prefer the V6 for obvious reasons.

[@909cobra]

my buddy works for dodge. he is the main sevice writer. FYI... he said to stay away from the v6. get the 2.0 turbo or 3.0 turbo diesal. he would know.

[@travelinben1966]

I’d consider the 4cyl turbo if it didn’t have that hybrid electric gizmatchee attached to it.Seems like a bag of snakes to me that will be problematic and expensive to fix.

[@savedbygracead6]

I'm right there with you. The turbo was enough for me. I didn't need any hybrid system to go with it.

[@CJBroncoF150]

It's definitely new tech, and costly if it breaks!

[@joshmcdermott8262]

Just from this video, despite the slower times of the 2.0 I am only becoming more convinced that it might be a better option, looking at the MPG indicator the 3.6 gets a little over 10 while the 2.0 gets mid-teens, and the biggest thing is the hill climb, the 3.6 wanted to scream it's way to the top but I didn't hear the 2.0 do that at all. It just lugged along like a diesel.

[@steveburrington4288]

Would be nice to see 0-60 comparison in a straight line

[@spitfire155k2]

Had both, 2.0L Turbo ALL DAY!!!!

[@CaptainSkidmark11]

First of all let me just say that I'm old school when it comes to driving the every day driver. I'm thinking of longevity of a engine...cubes verses rpm. With that being said. I wondering how long these turbos will last compared to the 3.6 engine? RPMs come with a price and do take their toll. My Ram diesel comes with a turbo and it does not turn the rpms the 4 cylinders motors do, which I do let it cool down before engine is shut off, so now you understand my concerns. Lets see the stats on how these engines hold up over 100k miles as a fair comparison. My thoughts bring me back to the old race between the Hare and the Tortoise. I guess you can see that I would rather have the slower rpm torque machine than a rpm racer. JMHO

[@Ken-qq6gp]

Which one actually burns more fuel ? Also do you require Supreme gas to achieve those numbers in the V4 ?

[@ukaszmroz7935]

The difference will probably come after 100 000 miles of usage. I'm from Europe, don't go this path. People are swapping factory overmaxxed turbo engines after ~ 50 000 miles of usage. Time will show if this is also a jeep case. Untill now you could buy used Wrangler with petrol engine and if it was not overheated frequently or drowned it will serve you pretty well. For Turbo units I am not sure about that.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Yup, time will certainly tell.

[@dariuszkujawski4938]

I"m happy that I bought new V6 Wrangler from december 2017. This way I could register it( in Europe). Now you can't register so big engines because of contaminate environment.This way Jeep Wrangler has 2,0L and Renegate has 1,0L engine. Tommorow you can't buy normal car.

[@DimplesChild401]

If you run these Jeeps in the ground, don’t keep up with maintenance and don’t get the proper aftermarket upgrades to do extreme off roading, then of course an engine swap will be needed in the future. That’s why I would never buy a used vehicle with a turbo because people run them hard and dump them and on to the next.

[@TheRoadTaken]

How long would you say an engine needs to be around to be proven? As of today's comment, it's June 2022 now and I feel like the 2.0L in the Wrangler should have any bugs worked out by now so I'm considering the 2.0L over the V6. The $$$ differences is $500 which is negligible on a vehicle this expensive.

[@DimplesChild401]

You won’t regret it! Just stay out of water that comes over your tires, or you will experience a lot of lag because of water in your diffs.

[@Catman1798]

Awesome awesome video!!!! Right to the point. I have a 2015 renegade trailhawk but I use to have the 2011 challenger v6 and a 2015 challenger v8 hemi don’t ask why the two. Lol. I think I preferred the v6 honestly. It was a good engine for the challenger. The hemi was just way too much power for my taste anyway. The 3.6 v6 was just right. As for the Jeep Wrangler I don’t know how it would feel with a heavy wrangler. But I would trust the V6 over that new turbo one any day. And based on your tests I think the v6 performed better. Do a Jeep renegade test next please lol I love watching renegade videos on here.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thank you very much for watching, please subscribe :)

[@bobquattrini1787]

My Jeep Cherokee xj has almost 400,000 miles and is just like new...4.0 AW4 BEAST!!!!

[@CJBroncoF150]

Send it all the way to 500,000!! Thanks for watching!

[@philliprader6298]

Great video!! Thanks for this. So excited to see how the diesel is. Diesel + manual= epic.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thank you!

[@dannykennedy1962]

To make a fair comparison you need to do the same modifications to the 2.0 Turbo... Its just not fair in a Non modified vs Modified with 2 more cylinders......

[@johnvandiermen616]

3.6 engine in some jeeps are ok . If you get a good one . The dealer has warranty the right side cylinder head to 150,000 miles . Because it cracks an they have problems. I work at the dealership an I replace about 4 a week . Also the oil filter housing cracks an leaks . You can go on line an see what problems people are having with this engine. Yes I own a jk with a 3.6 in it . Yes i replace the cylinder head an had the oil filter housing crack an it was not drivable. I was very piss off because I was 150 miles out in no where . So I put a 6.4 engine in now the jeep is awesome. So before you buy a Jeep go on line an check it out first . Don’t listen to people who make videos an tell you how great it is .

[@CJBroncoF150]

HEMI for the win!

[@pablomax3045]

Too true. My 2015 had the 3.6 replaced after only 1300 miles on the clock. Catastrophic failure. The replacement did not have any issues when I sold the Jeep later. The suspension though... that's another story. One issue after the next and no mods. The first point was that the factory "forgot" to tighten most of the bolts. Something that can literally cause deaths, you would think they double check, but not Jeep. ;) Still, I bought the JLUR except I have the 2.2CRD :)

[@MassFlow85]

Is the 5.7 reliable? Id like to know if theres any trouble spots on them.

[@reyperez3424]

john Van Diermen How hard is to put a v8 in JL

[@RickNethery]

I would go with the V6, it's naturally aspirated and doesn't need "a mild hybrid system" to make up for anything. 😉

[@EricCKeys]

The entire review seemed fairly biased with the driver already having the V6 and thinking its automatically better. Even when there was no discernible difference, there was a leaning to talk better about the 3.6. Going to test drive both when im ready to pickup a JL.

[@CJBroncoF150]

The only reason for that was the reliability standpoint of the 3.6 from previous years.

[@EricCKeys]

@@CJBroncoF150 there's a difference between talking about the reliability and acting as if the 3.6 is the all around better motor in every way then having a non biased rational review with pros/cons. I say that as someone who would buy the 3.6 V6 and went with a 4Runner Trail V6 anyway.

[@zowais]

Hey guys, I am ordering the 2020 JL sahara with 2.0l engine. I will ship it all the way to the middle east. I live in a mountain area. Will I experience any acceleration or high RPM issues with this new engine? Is it OK to fill 90 octane fuel for it?

[@AboxofMonsters]

The V6 really sounds good.

[@blakehyslop2605]

said no one ever

[@shelbyinstigator1727]

This comparison is ridiculous. Modded v6 vs unmodded turbo 4. How great. I test drove both and the turbo 4 is easily the better engine. Chose it without hesitation

[@LincolnSixAlpha]

Who cares performance.. Durability... 3.6, forget that 2.0

[@CJBroncoF150]

Great point!

[@BryanHectic]

Exactly the 3.6 and the 4.0's are the best engines jeep ever put out. If it ain't broke don't fix it

[@atx-cvpi_99]

Bryan _Hectic Maybe when the 2.0 turbo is in production long enough they may be a good engine but they are just too new.

[@andremellao4882]

my has 8 years and never broke

[@sinepari9160]

That's why I love owning a Jeep. If I'm doing the speed limit I definitely know and can compensate.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Right on!

[@4-LOW]

3.6L all day every day. 2.0L is a waste of money, literally. You pay more at purchase time, more to maintain it, more for future repairs, more for fuel, etc. And what do you really get? Slightly more torque, and slightly less horsepower. Horrible trade-off. And just wait until that BSG unit dies out of warranty, or that turbo, or that 48v system with wiring and coolant hoses running UNDER the Jeep. Just terrible....

[@Shakshuka69]

@Kamil Korzeniowski for now lol.

[@rachelleb.2392]

Lol at the BSG unit failing

[@jasoncouch2480]

Driving at 7000to 11,000plus here in Colorado with so little O2 and the ability to just computer tune for huge HP increase with a properly turbo’ed engine, you’ve got to think hard about the 2 liter.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Great point!

[@RFJersey]

4.0 Straight 6 please

[@dawn7998]

Piece of shit after 100,000 miles you'll need a new motor out of the crate that's why don't make them anymore dip shit

[@robertclary1718]

@@dawn7998 you're obviously a complete and total moron when it comes to that engine. It's one of the most reliable engines ever made, I've personally had two go 300,000 miles. You should keep your mouth shut when you have no idea what you're talking about.

[@AwholvNation]

If you want an ancient technologically dead engine platform go get an ancient technologically dead YJ its 2019, I'll take a 3.6 over the 4.0 anyday for a vehicle I drive everyday.

[@CJBroncoF150]

One of the best engines ever made

[@rondail5675]

Very interesting. I have preferred a V6 to a 4cly\turbo. I was worried when the 4cyl showed more torque and at a lower RPM. I feel good with the evaluation and outcome. Thanks. I just bought a 2019 Honda Ridgeline with the 6-speed, kind-of wish I had the 9-speed now.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Good pick, thanks for watching!

[@rodneyws1977]

Pretty sure the 2.0 is made in Italy. They're not known for making reliable things.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Shots fired!

[@domenico6464]

2L Turbo gas made in Trenton plant -USA Besides, as long as you guys are not stalked by fuel, HP or other excises, go for what you like more. cheers

[@d.s7741]

like a Beretta 92 FS

[@JLBREMER]

Test drove both myself and I felt the V6 turbo was zippier than the other. But both are faster than my old 2011 JKU. My only concern is the 4cyl being electrical and mechanical and how that will handle water. I heard it’s got a tiny battery under one of the seats. What if that gets wet ?? Either way as of Sunday I have the 4 cyl 2019 works for me !$

[@dustyclery8791]

The 4 is the turbo......

[@cmacg831]

Just traded in my 2013 JKU for the 2019 2.0 JLU. I was skeptical of the new turbo engine at first, then I drove it. Love the new engine! It definitely feels faster to me, from standing starts to 60 or even rolling starts, but I like things to be accurately tested and compared. Extreme Terrain did a dyno test of both the 3.6 and the 2.0 side by side here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/h3unfqqYo6eMd6c The proof is in the puddin'! Quite a bit more torque out of the 2.0! Car and Driver also did a 0-60 test on both engines and they have the 2.0 beating the 3.6 to 60 by a slim 3/10th's of a second. My 2013 JK averaged about 16.5 mpg with oversized 35" tires. Before the lift and tires though, I was only seeing 17.5 mpg average. On the new 2.0, with about 200 miles on it, I have averaged 22 mpg which is a combination of freeway and in-town driving. So far I'm super happy with my choice! The 3.6 is a great engine though and I put 60,000 miles on it and NEVER had a problem!

[@terrywaters6186]

A Yugo engine can go 60,000 miles with no problem. My 4runner has gone 268,000 miles with no problem and still going. The old Jeep 4.0 IL 6 commonly go over 300,000. Just saying. I hope the 3.6 is as trouble free because I just bought a new JL with it.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks for the comment and the detailed info!

[@fuhjk502]

I watched the dyno video posted. If you look at the torque mapping the 2.0 is not as consistent as the V6 and it has a shorter power band. I have the 2022 Sahara with the V6 mild hybrid which adds even more torque when you need it. If you're thinking of buying a 2022 for off road the new V6 e assist is the better motor. Of course their new V8 rocks but you need to step up to the Rubicon to get it and it's pricey.

[@bob-a-louannamaria7960]

Pussy. There is no replacement.

[@PoppaSimTV]

thinking about getting the 2.0l turbo rubicon... do u think 37s with a 3 inch lift would be ok or would it be too strenuous for the 4 cylinder?

[@CJBroncoF150]

That would be perfect!

[@grr86]

Everyone keeps saying “throw a tuner on the 2.0 and it will be a beast!” Maybe so, but as it is the engine platform isn’t even reliable in stock form, much less pushing 75-100+ over stock. And you can kiss your warranty goodbye!!

[@CJBroncoF150]

Whats a warranty??

[@DimplesChild401]

It’s fast enough. A tuner is a waste of money.

[@ericsantiago9187]

My wife has a 2013 rubicon with 250k miles. Regular oil changes and maintenance. Still has plenty of life. I'm lookn for a 2018-19 unlimited sport myself. I'm just afraid the turbo engines will have a shorter life span vs the v6.