2 + 2 = 5 How | Breaking the rules of mathematics | Fun of Mathematics: Ep 1

Prove that 2+2=5 | Breaking the rules of mathematics.
The one of the viral math equation is 2+2=5. It is not usual mathematical result that 2+2=5. However, it is easy to prove that 2+2=5. In this video, I show the solution of 2+2=5 through a funny viral math trick. Two plus two equals five is very common math trick, I am representing here in an attractive way of explanations. It is comparable to 0% financing on the car loan (don't take it seriously, I am kidding). I made this viral math equation and you try to find out where is the mistake in 2+2=5 math.
I am launching a new series of video related to mathematics by the playlist 'Fun of Mathematics'. Video related to funny mathematics related things will be uploaded on every Tuesday at 2 pm Central European time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Watch other interesting videos on Matescium
Scientist measures the smallest of the smallest thin film by Spectroscopic Ellipsometers: • Measuring the smallest...
How Solar Panels Turn Sunlight into Electricity | Photoelectric Effect: • How Solar Panels Turn ...
Rare view of X-Ray gun | Expensive shiny polycrystal | Ferrofluid | Full HD (60 fps) : • Video
Levitating water experiment | Does all liquid stay in the upside down glass? : • Levitating water exper...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to Matescium:
kzbin.info?sub_c...
Overview of Matescium:
/ matescium
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#2+2=5 #MathTricks #ViralMath #2+2=5MathTrick #FunOfMathematics #2+2=5How #4+4=5How
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for watching it.

[@Matescium]

I found a way to trap light in a mirror box. Check this exciting video here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGWYeZt8i5ibbbs

[@jaya1122]

How can u sepeate 4 and 5 from the equation i.e.(4x5)-(4x5)=(5x5)-(5x5)...here is the mistake

[@RohitKumar-qi1zk]

Correct

[@mohammadvempalli3973]

If u see this video then u will forgot ur mathematics

[@mohammadvempalli3973]

Hey man u can't cancel 0 with 0 remember that

[@nivashkumar1663]

0=0 10-10=100-100 (10-10)=10(10-10) 1=10

[@amrit3882]

Kin kin logo ne ye video Bina search kiye Dekha hai 😂

[@bibhuprakash2472]

Mene

[@FrostDisaster]

Maine 😂

[@krishsingh5859]

Muje bro

[@lakshraina]

Mujhe

[@rajput_9454]

Me

[@secretpokemon838]

4(5-5)‌=5(5-5) 4×0=5×0 0=0 There is the mistake

[@rwikhabasumatary8538]

@@elangoelango3450 5-5 equal 0 bro😂😂

[@pinshubhuarya]

@@rwikhabasumatary8538 h Yes you Are Right😂😂😂😂

[@maheenazhar8926]

(5_5 ) 4 ka sath multiply ho raha tha jb (5_5 )dosri side pr jay ga to divide ho jay ga phir (5_5 ) cancel ho jay ga ga (5_5 ) or 1 ajay ga phir 4 =5 honjay ga

[@mkhan4380]

@@rwikhabasumatary8538 😅😅iM dead😂😂😂🤣🤣

[@rwikhabasumatary8538]

@@maheenazhar8926 bracket first bro.... Woh Dono side pe cancel huaa. kuyki Woh divide tha each other.... So first bracket (which is minus) and divide next..... BODMAS rule is important even Einstein had used this formula

[@mdnuraabidohemdnuraabidohe6137]

The problem is at 4(5-5) = 5(5-5). This is the same as 4(0) = 5(0), but canceling them out isn't something that you can do in this case. This is because dividing both sides by (5-5) would be the same as dividing by zero, since 5-5 = 0. When you divide by zero, any number can be equal to any other number.

[@SanjeevKumar-dc7td]

😮😮

[@dammitimmad9121]

Exactly According to his logic, 1=2=3=4=5...to infinity.

[@chhotelalgupta9559]

You can not divide 0 by 0 because it is not defined and therefore (5-5)/(5-5) cannot be divided. 2:34

[@vijayakumarijuturi1006]

Yes

[@mollyhackman4910]

Exactly you can't divide by zero.

[@user-si6fd6lw6e]

Even though it's so easy, it's probably because it's not taught properly in junior high school or high school classes that there are so many irrelevant comments. LHS=4(5-5)=4(0)=0, RHS=5(5-5)=5(0)=0, so it is correct up to 4(5-5)=5(5-5) . Next, he made a mistake by dividing both sides by (5-5)=0. Both sides are in the state of "(non-zero numerical value) x 0 = 0". No matter what you multiply by 0, it will be 0, so this (non-zero numerical value) is also (a numerical value that can be anything). By dividing both sides by (5-5), the "0 part" disappears, leaving with "4" and "5" (which can be any numerical value). Thus, the strange "4=5" appears.

[@Matescium]

Thanks for your explanation!

[@NAVDEEPSINGH-ze6rc]

I DID IT RIGHT ( LIKE THE WAY YOU EXPLAINED ) AND IN RETURN THE TEACHER GAVE ME A GIFT OF 0 MARKS AND 2 THAPADD 😎😎😎

[@princepandey5272]

🕺🕺🕺

[@ichigokurosaki5237]

Speak in english so majority people understand ( I understood cz im indian)

[@TheKnowledgeTree_]

You are the genius

[@WKG2583]

@@ichigokurosaki5237 it's our Indian secret😉

[@hemabhatia6729]

@@ichigokurosaki5237 it's his choice btw I also like bleach

[@BeyToons-India]

2:29 Here is the Mistake You have eliminated 5-5 which is literally 0... You can never eliminate 0 from 0 If you do it it will be 0/0 which is not defined Hence every laws of mathematics are as it is and you have broken that law to prove that...

[@chitragdekhandepatil3971]

Yes

[@valmont0080]

Correct bro...

[@r.linkeshwaranmbbs7535]

Yes you are correct

[@paraskashyap4374]

Yeah

[@Capstan715]

@@paraskashyap4374 good job mate

[@abdulqodirmir]

2:27 Here the trick starts. Nothing happens willy-nilly. And, I cannot remove anything from equation just because I think they should go away. There, we had to divide by common number to get rid of unnecessary numbers. For example, if I have an equation: (360-35)*6=(245+X)*6, then I can erase both 6s in both sides which literally means: I AM DIVIDING BOTH SIDES BY that number 6. So, I will have (360-35)=(245+X) left. However, in the video, they are dividing by (5-5) zero (0) which is nonsense, isn't it?. Dividing by zero the trick begins. (Furthermore, in the beginning of the video he also said he was breaking the rules of maths.) [Thanks!]

[@ankitasingh4930]

This is more difficult than algebra 😂😂😂

[@jamilasiraj1236]

Exactly 😅😅

[@SY_09]

3rd and 4th class students be like : " So finally our maths teacher is wrong "

[@kellyy_.o7388]

Lol true

[@satabdiroy971]

Lol

[@meershabnam5302]

🤣🤣

[@Editya1]

Lol🤣🤣🤣

[@prakritisingh8330]

@Joanna Cameron Netto lol kisi ko mat bolo

[@abhilakshyaarora7391]

This is a great video. The mistake is in this step 4*(5-5)=5*(5-5) In this step you just cancelled (5-5) which is equals to 0,so basically you are dividing both the sides by (5-5) which is equals to zero , which means you are doing 0/0 which is undefined, that's 2+2 doesn't equals to 5.

[@dandelions_yt]

👍👍👍👍👍

[@mrzerogaming4012]

Yeah I remember my teacher once saying 0x=0y x=y This is unacceptable as you can't multiply the numbers with 0 in rhs lhs type questions

[@buddhadeb4131]

Ya🧐

[@buddhadeb4131]

@ANGELIC_GAMER 😂

[@icon1studio662]

Sure,0÷0 is undefined

[@vineethkumar6750]

He wants to prove 2+2= 5 and wrote 4 as 2+2. Wow 👏👏

[@azur7362]

you wrote it as 2+2 too

[@irishgamer-by2gm]

@@azur7362 💀

[@eirecom22]

If this was real math counting would be a monster

[@IS-py3dk]

You have do the brackets before simplifying 4 (5 - 5) = 5 (5 - 5) Now imagine transposing instead of cancelling It will be division :- 4 = 5 [ (5 - 5) ÷ (5 - 5) ] The thing that you are doing wrong is the order of operations that is the PEMDAS or BODMAS rule Brackets come first If they are done firts so :- 4 (5 - 5) = 5 (5 - 5) Brackets will be simplified to make 0 So 4 × 0 = 5 × 0 = 0 Note : Another thing that is wrong especially for grade 5 and 6 students who might not know this Brackets been done first and then division might cause this problem :- 4 (5 - 5) = 5 (5 - 5) 4 × 0 = 5 × 0 Now you might think we can divide 0 from both sides and get 4 = 5 × 0/0 So any number upon any number = 1 Same you will do with 0. So 0/0 = 1 4 = 5 × 1 This is clearly absurd because anything ÷ 0 is *Undefined* U may also get 4 = 5 × 0/0 0/0 = 1/2 0/0 = 1/3 And so on with different fractions or rational numbers This always gives absurd result

[@TLxmomo]

Waa

[@Inc.110]

Ohh ohh oh my goddddddddd😮😮😮😮 math guru pranam🙏🙏🙏

[@cooldork2542]

Agahahah me v banungi ek din maths me aese 😂

[@SG-fl4my]

4(5-5)=5(5-5) Yes ,cancelling the (5-5)we get 0 only not 1,multiply anything with 0 we get 0 only

[@arpitapriyadarshini5587]

Tnx

[@AbhishekPatel-ej5ft]

You can't cut off (5-5) because it's already 0 . If yes then anyone can write 1x0=100x0 and cut off 0 from both side then 1=100

[@nakulmehta6757]

This explanation is perfect

[@vivekmaurya9574]

Yes because 0/0 is indetermined and he can't take 0/0 as 1......

[@bhargabdas3206]

wow

[@Nishom0926]

Basic Rule of match You always suppose. Seriously And people say Philosophers are Chaotic.😒

[@ramawatidevi9112]

You are wrong

[@DeadUser1l]

This guy is the whole embodiment of the Galaxy Brain meme

[@dipendragahamagar2386]

Mathematician socked KZbinr rocked 😂🤣😂

[@hudaheckru]

When cancelling 5 - 5 on both sides, you're essentially dividing both sides by 5 - 5. But thing is you can't divide by 5 - 5, cuz dividing by 0 ain't defined. Hence, cancelling 5 - 5 isn't possible. And thus, 4 not equal to 5. 🙂👐🏻

[@Itz1y_cringe]

Nerdy alert

[@ratio420]

ok nerd

[@decentsanage6509]

But isn't it really obv?

[@Itz1y_cringe]

@@decentsanage6509 ohh yes we just joke why u serious 😑

[@decentsanage6509]

@@Itz1y_cringe that statement wasn't for you

[@UnknownDevian]

When I told this trick to my teacher he deducted my five marks in maths and convert into 2+2 by this I got 4 marks 😂

[@Sriji_Ser]

Lol

[@priyanshiprashar7118]

Lol

[@latikaghawale9835]

mcnf m,./

[@namru3246]

😂

[@taqfarha2217]

🤣🤣

[@SamudraFlavorsYT]

2:50 this shows how much he truly enjoys and loves mathematics:)

[@chathutechbro142]

He says himself that he has done the mistake and goes to the next step without correcting it...😂

[@smarakipradhan955]

No, it's wrong. We can't eliminate 0 just by cancelling it from both sides. The correct equation will be : → 4(5-5) = 5(5-5) → 4(0) = 5(0) → 4 × 0 = 5 × 0 → 0 = 0 Hence, 4 ≠ 5, i.e, 4 is not equal to 5.

[@onlymazaat.v1680]

Right

[@rizalditwo1550]

👍 you're the 5% team member.

[@smarakipradhan955]

@@studycookingandfunwithgurk8351 Thanks

[@smarakipradhan955]

@@rizalditwo1550 Thanks

[@smarakipradhan955]

@@onlymazaat.v1680 Thanks

[@kribh0766]

The equation is that 4 (5-5) = 5 (5-5) 4 (0) = 5 (0) When we open the bracket then, 4 x 0 = 5 x 0 0 = 0

[@senobita3778]

This is wright

[@a2motivationsuper.1.5m7]

Are Bhai 5-5 ko left side laoge to wo divide ho Jayega aur 1 aayega

[@muhammadtajammelijaz3284]

@@a2motivationsuper.1.5m7 ok 4(0)=5(0) is (0) ko left side le jao or 1 bna do

[@a2motivationsuper.1.5m7]

Are Mai keh Raha hu ki 5-5 ko left side laoge to 5-5 se divide ho Kar 1 aayega aur 4*1=4 Hota hai 4=5

[@JaswinderKaur-db3zz]

This is right

[@ritgoswa]

From 4(5-5)=5(5-5), one cannot simply "cancel out" the 5*5 to deduce that 4=5.The reason is that both sides of the equation are equal to 0, and you cannot deduce any new equivalences between numbers from an equation that states that 0 equals 0.

[@MrPanda-sw4lf]

You cannot cross out (5 - 5) and (5 - 5) because 0 cannot be divided by 0 and crossing out literally means turning them into 1 by dividing. 0 divided by 0 gives math error as the result can be anything from 0 to infinity. Hence 0 divided by 0 is not accepted in mathematics.

[@Sanskar05]

You Can't Cancel (5-5) from Both Side,Cause Canceling means Division and Anything Divide By Zero is Infinite.

[@mamtabahekar3659]

Undefined it is😂

[@bhavnagupta3403]

Yes bro

[@Praveen-jz7lh]

True 💯

[@swastikarora1109]

TRUE

[@danthal5967]

❌

[@sushreeipsitanaik7828]

4(5-5)=5(5-5) 4×0=5×0 (Applying BODMAS rule, first of all we solve bracket) So, 0=0.

[@kusumlata9996]

👍👍👍

[@uzairbangash3238]

Well

[@rishabhjain2634]

Right

[@dynamicshiva9486]

S

[@imuthless6914]

Op right

[@DRAxYDRACULA]

oh no this pen is empty let me use another red 😂😂😂

[@SwissDontMiss]

"Here's how 2+2=5" *Writes an entirely different problem* Wow you sure are smart!

[@majid1661]

After watching this : Me to my landlord : " come here " "My monthly rent 9000 = 0 "

[@johngardner5169]

Better hope they don't understand the order of operations (pemdas) when you try to show them why you paid zero for rent.

[@suphaltechandgaming472]

🤣🤣🤣well said

[@user-pr8kv8nz8l]

😂😂😂 Did they agreed about this

[@majid1661]

@@user-pr8kv8nz8l yes surely 😂

[@iamanonymous9061]

@@majid1661 😂😂😂😂

[@mdshahnawazhussain2914]

HERE IS THE MISTAKE : IN bodmas we have to first solve the bracket number and then others and you did wrong here: 4×(5-5) = 5×(5-5) Here you have to first solve the bracket .... Correct way is like this : 4×(5-5) = 5x(5-5) 4×0 = 5×0 0=0 Hence proved !!!! CHALO BYEEE GUYS THANKS FOR READING MY COMMENT ..... Lots of love FROM India...

[@TheRaj_69]

Same to u broo..! 😁

[@diyabeniwal606]

He said by braking maths rule he proved that 2+2=5... so there is no mean to apply bodmas rules .so please take your words back

[@zenith405]

DESIIIIII

[@zakiraversi3983]

@@diyabeniwal606 but there was a mistake so i guess we could apply bodmas rule

[@ssin1785]

lol this is a goddamn meme

[@waah_re_zindage]

There's a pretty mistake in proof. You can't eliminate 0s if they are common on both sides . If you cancel any real no. by eleminating them. It means you are sending the number from one hand to another for division ab=ad b=d. [b=ad/a] but if you divide the value from 0 the value gets undefined. So the moment you eleminated 0s, value on either side got undefined

[@user-lc6tg1bk3v]

My brain in not working anymore when I see this math 😅😅😅😅😅😅

[@divitmehta3115]

You solve this question through BODMAS so in bodmas you first evaluate / simplify the brackets (in this case it would be 5-5=0) and then divide. So here's the mistake

[@sanasamkheroda3192]

I don't understand anything you say

[@gayatridantare6930]

@@sanasamkheroda3192 bruda he is saying 5-5 =0 and he cut 5-5 with 5-5 which means he is deviding 0/0 which is not defined 😉😉 I ALREADY KNEW THIS TRICK😀😀😎

[@vaibhavgupta8990]

But where is divide step

[@darkpool073]

@@sanasamkheroda3192 I think u don't know basic math

[@user-bh4gg8rt2p]

What was he saying in this video I don't get anything

[@madhurawat155]

Because cancelling a number on both sides is not really a thing. It actually means dividing a number on both sides and you CAN'T divide anything by 0.

[@NayanW5]

Yea

[@balramkr5050]

Right.

[@harroopkaur8253]

Me😂

[@biningnindri1549]

I was about to answer the same

[@goatmeat9087]

Bohot Gyan hain tumhare paas, IIT hogaya kya clear??

[@zuberyusuf2718]

Legends are seeing after mom telling 2+2=5😎😎

[@khabarkus.]

Mathematics has its complete rules 2:30 you cannot eliminate(cancel out) zero by zero🤷🤷 That is 5-5 cannot be cancelled by 5-5 as both are zero🤦🤦 And 0 ÷0 is not defined 😁😁 Here it is where you made the mistake 👍👍👍

[@amol7913]

It's right

[@nihanshupethe8983]

💯

[@poyi.kedann.orangada]

Oh genius👍👌

[@gamelian]

@@poyi.kedann.orangada good brain🙄

[@huntereditzff]

😶 yeah right

[@sahilagrawal6530]

Using 2+2=4 for proving it equal to 5, LOL😂

[@shohagmilon2279]

Me bina search ke ye hi dekh ra ho.😂

[@himpriya9379]

Now, This is the true example of "*An Idle mind is the devil's workshop.*"

[@popykhanom7272]

🔥🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@suneethag5526]

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

[@nehafirdos1874]

Yesss

[@tejassohal2151]

@strawberry pup no his mind is universe of devil

[@itsmaxtherott3917]

hehehehehhahahhahahhehehhehhahahahahhahahhahaahhahahahahahhehehhehehehhehehehehehehhehehehehhehehehehehehehehhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahheheheheehhehehehehehhehehehehehehhhehhehehehhehhehehehheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhheehehhehhehehehehehehehehehehehehehhehehehehehehehhehehhehehhehehehehhehehhhehehhehehehhehehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...

[@azharkhorasany1982]

5-5 is actually 0. When you are eliminating 5-5 on both sides, you are actually dividing one with the other. And 0 divided by 0 is actually infinity. So LHS =4 x infinity which is infinity and so for the RHS.

[@Cheaterkiller844]

Yes you are correct ✅

[@priyadarshiashokgautam2455]

Your reasoning is incorrect . 0/0 is not infinity it's actually 1/0 (but this is a concept of physics) . Anything divided by 0 is not defined in mathematics . Even calculator knows that

[@wohumai]

This is wrong . Correct explanation is that in fourth line you had break the rule . That is first we have to solve the bracket then we can divide. I am saying about the rule of BODMAS . Hope you understand .

[@adeeps1606]

0 over 0 is not infinity. It is not defined. Dividing by zero is just not defined. It is not infinity. Both the things are different.

[@shubhankarmondal9314]

Agree with your logic,,,,this is the only reason why this type of result has come,,, that result is totally wrong where he cancelled 5-5 from both sides

[@khoirulhuda6294]

Karena anda awalnya mengambil persamaan bilangan 0 = 0, persamaan bilangan ini akan selalu seperti itu baik ruas kiri dan ruas kanan akan tetap nilainya 0 jika dikalikan atau dibagi dengan "sembarang bilangan yang lebih besar 0"

[@P0KEM0N_world]

5 min and 40 sec just to poop so bad

[@smitasingh6264]

This is how I attempt my whole question paper of Maths.

[@humzaansari8134]

😂😂😂

[@apgaming1095]

Lol

[@KAI-hg6gh]

Same

[@sreejitdas8621]

🤣🤣♥️

[@drxculla]

I know the mistake it will be that 0 cant be cut in lhs and rhs as 0/0 is not defined

[@Parveen_Sajid]

Me seeing this before one day of my maths test and getting even more confuse

[@omkashyap4125]

😆😆😆

[@michitara.7323]

Yeah me too

[@alanpshaju3596]

Bruh same here... I bet u searched for how to eliminate options in mcqs

[@krishnabarnwal4192]

😅🤣🤣

[@luckykumar3655]

😂😂

[@WolfWriterL.P]

my brain hurts i was an innocent middle schooler just trying to do math 😬

[@yadavsantosh7910]

3rd and 4th class student be likee ,,:!our mathematics jow teacher is work

[@ujjin_raider]

The mistake is in this step 4*(5-5)=5*(5-5) In this step you just cancelled (5-5) which is equals to 0,so basically you are dividing both the sides by (5-5) which is equals to zero , which means you are doing 0/0 which is undefined, that's 2+2 doesn't equals to 5.

[@Geethalkalindu]

You're correct.👍

[@Killerking_plays]

U are not correct because if there are numbers same on both sides then u can cut each of them if it equals to 0 still u can cut it

[@MSKMusical]

Exactly 💯

[@Bookish_Haven]

@@Killerking_plays agree

[@ujjin_raider]

@@Killerking_plays proud of your knowledge

[@manishmanish543]

According to BODMAS Rule you have to solve brackit first so, 4(5-5)=5(5-5) 4×0=5×0 0=0

[@rajbirraj6261]

Yes

[@ishansh0077]

He divided both sides by (5-5) in the vid and this is an error, he wrote the value of 0/0 as 1, this is wrong. The prove by this guy is wrong.

[@tawqeerahmadmalik5117]

At 4×0=5×0, he can still cancel 0 and 0 on both sides of the equation and prove 4=5 😉😉..and in that case even such long procedure isn't needed. Actually 0 and 0 can't be cancelled.

[@soniyakhanna1516]

@@ishansh0077 I was going to write the same 😂

[@rollingmantiss9396]

Dude or u can cancel LHS and RHS (5-5) So u get 4=5.What u did was also correct but u can use distributive property or the method which I have explained now.

[@O-DEVILARYANBOY123oFFICIAL]

Attendence of 3rd and 4th class students..😂 (9th class student got responsibility) 5:12

[@Steve-IkI]

BODMAS said this is bullsh*t! 😂😂😂

[@KashifTufail-Outso]

According to the BODMAS rule, we should calculate the 'Brackets' first which would mean 4 (5-5) = 5 (5-5) will result in 4 (0) = 5 (0) and consequently, the answer will be 0 = 0.

[@advikpatil4163]

You are a real genius

[@KashifTufail-Outso]

@@advikpatil4163 Thanks bro :)

[@rashmyroshan3448]

Kuch bhi the real answer should not be this

[@rashmyroshan3448]

It should be like this 4×0=5×0 so u can cut the zero but actually it's you equate any number using this so u cant use zero so this is wrong

[@mohammedabdulrehan6643]

i think its right

[@mandarkhandeshe6809]

Forget Maths, I've never seen anyone writing "S" like that... 😂

[@tharin5242]

Like this

[@VibinShervai-gv4if]

You cannot cancel similar terms on both sides where numbers are present In algebra you can only cancel similar terms on both sides when you have common variables For example, ( a + b )(a + b) = (a + b )( a - b ) =(a+b) = (a-b)

[@georgechristou7982]

lol no thats not true

[@vschess]

You can't convert line 3 to line 4. Although it is correct this time, if you substitute the numbers with something else, it won't always be the same.

[@lilyswan6543]

Guy: let's prove 2+2=5 Pen: No. 0:36

[@soumiksarkar7019]

The video makes me Albert Einstein. 😂😂😂

[@hardikrane4181]

Its make you think you are albret Einstein

[@Pranav_OG]

WTF

[@kingkoba5618]

Well I saw this guy is in Germany and Albert Einstein is German

[@akshatbhatter178]

are you a fool??

[@soumiksarkar7019]

@@akshatbhatter178 for this question I feel you are a fool .

[@kianstrenn]

when the math teacher is thom yorke

[@Tyler_Skye77]

Oh, I figured it out. This helped explain it, thanks 😊 For anyone who doesn’t know; 4(5-5) = 5(5-5) is correct, but is the same as 0 = 0. By removing the (5-5) from the equation, the result was changed to 4 = 5. He removed the part where 4 & 5 are multiplied by 0. The real answer is; 4(5-5) = 5(5-5), 4(0) = 5(0), 4 = 5.

[@55ttyuch35klo]

When you eliminate the similar term on both side you divide by zero. That is not allowed. You can eliminate the term only when they are different of zero.

[@nazrinazrifamily4801]

Wve the best way for you and I will🖤🖤🖤🖤🤲

[@nazrinazrifamily4801]

Rrrrrrrrrrrrr the best way to get the best way to get the latest version for you and I b Etty the best way for me to get 🖤

[@thunderskull258]

If non-zero

[@mathsmania2453]

the mistake is that we first will solve bracket (5-5)=0

[@ShaquilleOATMEAL_]

I understand the logic you're using, When you take out the common factor of 4 and 5, you're left with 0 on both sides of the equation. This means that you can't cancel out the common terms, because 0 is not equal to 4 or 5. Therefore, the final equation 2 plus 2 is not equal to 5.

[@sharminsultana6670]

Crazy Man🥴🤣🤣

[@Helloworldhello9908]

0÷0 is a indeterminate form. So we can't multiply or divide by zero on either sides of an equation. So you can't cancel 0 on either sides and that is a mathematics rule which you didn't follow. Even my maths teacher had taught us it in his first class to make the class interesting ☺

[@maavezali4428]

but he already said in the title 'breaking math's rules'

[@yfjsdgzjdnfn]

Yaa bro I too taught in same way but. Don't know how to say 📚📚

[@Helloeveryone77]

33+33×33-33÷0= ɪɴғɪɴɪᴛʏ

[@max55436]

@@maavezali4428 then its not maths any more. u can break rule by saying 1+1=11

[@akellasriramteja4586]

Exactly ...I am just cheking in the comments whether anyone has picked up this point

[@paras.p]

Pythagoras and other mathematician after seeing this video --isk to game bajana padega 😂😂

[@thelegend3458]

Hence proved sir 😂

[@fssocrates]

Eliminating (5-5) from both sides means, you're dividing both sides by (5-5), and that's dividing by 0, which breaks the rules.

[@ayushman1940]

2:54 *"I made a very clever mistake"* Engineering students : "Yes it was very clever"

[@adityaamodkar6715]

True💯😂

[@ayushman1940]

@@adityaamodkar6715 LOL

[@Gwfigher]

2:54

[@priyankagoswami7018]

Rules of mathematics be like: Humari taraf toh koi dekhta hi nahi..😜😂

[@tyranthindigaming7472]

Sahi kaha bhai lekin phir bhi meri maths thodi to acchi hai 9th class me hu

[@corpster_gaming8621]

@@nehaparveen3460 bhai 10th to maths me in genius that men bhi 11th me in mat lena chahe kuch ho jay

[@nehaparveen3460]

@@corpster_gaming8621 11th ki maths easy hai 10th ke maths se 😅

[@priyankagoswami7018]

@@nehaparveen3460 not at all.. 😅

[@nehaparveen3460]

@@priyankagoswami7018 mujhe easy hi lagi 😊

[@TomThePuss]

i go into a market trying to buy 2 + 2 apples, i show the owner this vid and got 5

[@adambakas13]

This guy just demonstrated factoring polynomials more effectively than videos that are actually about factoring polynomials.

[@thisaranimanthaka1857]

@2.30: according to bodmas: "b" is the1st , then "d" ✍

[@YtCinemaTv_23M]

You cut the (5-5) with (5-5) means 5-5 is equal to 0 and you can't be cut 0 with 0 so here you did the mistake 🤙☺️

[@mrakshith346]

then 4(0)=0 5(0)=0 Hence proved

[@YtCinemaTv_23M]

@@mrakshith346 👍

[@anirudhkharayat3433]

Buddy there was a number before bracket so it means you should multiply the number with that number your method is wrong

[@pramodh1112]

Not zero it's 1

[@YtCinemaTv_23M]

@@pramodh1112 how?

[@ankeettt]

According to BODMAS rule u cannot solve the equation without first solving whats inside the bracket ! That implies 4(5-5)=5(5-5) 4(0)=5(0) 0=0

[@devisgrant5037]

Ankeet Panda yah open bracket first....

[@r.a.g5771]

No bro it can be as it is not necessary in multiplication

[@shilasherminshompa3714]

No,first open the bracket by multiple the words into the bracket

[@nathanorourke3530]

Pemdas

[@mianjemi1524]

Yehi misttake h

[@ch.ayushman6712]

You had broke the BODMAS rule of mathematics 2:24

[@rafayichenhe3249]

The equation would result in division with zeros. Canceling out the 5s lead to an indeterminate form of 4(0) / 5(0).

[@v_recipies]

here you take : =>20-20=25-25 =>(4*5)-(4*5)=(5*5)-(5*5) =>4(5-5)=5(5-5) here you cancelled out (5-5) from both side but this not valied due to BODMAS.... DMAS rule of mathamethics here first you have to solve in the bracket than comes on multiplication but you directly cancelled out (5-5) which is the mistake

[@2percentskills274]

@Narut0 what

[@sansengg]

He did according to indicies rule maybe but you can't do this in mathematics, you're right

[@nirajpathak99]

LOL, it's valid.. Only this which is not valid is division by zero.. Zero by Zero is undefined.. not 1 😂

[@rajeshreehomemakervlog313]

Exactly....you are right friend

[@faizanghaznavi543]

Exactly

[@bhartijangid7301]

Our maths teacher is going to confuse ..That from where we are learning this unique😂

[@aliasgarattari3107]

Yes

[@LazaRoblox]

True tho

[@vishnupeter8202]

Yes

[@santanubhattacharya5835]

@Sunita Gupta yes, he is breaking the rules of maths. He said it himself

[@ayushninjayt3922]

Two plaaaass Two 😂😂😂😂

[@adrijnayak6814]

Maths fullform mathematics ❌ Mental accuracy talented humans✅

[@syit_334_vaibhav3]

Albert Einstein wants to know his location Einstein and hawking came in my dream and said that This is the reason why we died

[@piyadasgupta2121]

4(5-5) 5(5-5) = 4×0 5×0 =0-0 =0. Here is the mistake

[@notdarking]

Germany

[@softstack978]

India

[@notdarking]

@@softstack978 Not India

[@slimeline6456]

Taki woh uske ghar aakar maare 😂😂

[@ankitnayak2964]

My math teacher resigned from his job after watching this 😂

[@itsme-xo4ku]

Deep condolences to u and ur kindergarten teacher😂😂😂😂

[@hydrahindgaming]

😂😂😂

[@Rip_trungvie]

i need this for beluga 😂😂😂😂

[@hemangmehta1187]

Mistake is that after cutting 5-5 from both sides 0 remains in both sides and in LHS 4*0=0 and in RHS also 5*0=0 so again 0=0 remains..

[@beepbeepgamer1305]

on the 3rd step 4(5-5) = 5(5-5) You need to find whats inside the brackets first and then only eliminate if there are common values according to PEMDAS/BODMAS rules. If you apply that rules, You will get 4(5-5) = 5(5-5) => 4(0)=5(0) => 0=0

[@brianfairclough4109]

Another method: 2(antilog/10) + 2(antilog/10) = 3.169. 10Log 3.169 = 5. The calculation works where the numbers being added are logarithmic. An example of a logarithmic number is the decibel (dB). So: 2 dB + 2 dB = 5 dB

[@prabhsidhu2186]

It just the 4 = undefined in that situation ie, 0/0.

[@bholukumar5956]

It's not PEDMAS it's PEMDAS

[@beepbeepgamer1305]

@@bholukumar5956 yeah mb

[@hussain500k2]

Bro is right

[@yesitsme6]

Everyone : "This is right" , "This is wrong" Me: Why have he tagged Germany?

[@ushaeppili708]

Me too

[@mahii.27]

Right 😂😂🤣

[@sunnydaylol931]

Right 👍

[@mahii.27]

@@sunnydaylol931 ur name lol!

[@sunnydaylol931]

@@mahii.27 it is what it is 😌

[@koreandevilgirl]

Your mistake is you are mistakly born in earth 😂😂😂😂😂

[@itzmoonlight4764]

1. Everything that is possible has a reason 2. The univers is possible, so it has a reason

[@itzmoonlight4764]

woooow youre so smart 👓

[@ayush_0608]

Bro replied his own comment and raised too🗿

[@koushikkaizer271]

Here, ⇨ 4(5-5) = 5(5-5) ⇨4*0=5*0 ⇨ 0=0 So, 2+2= 5 isn't possible....

[@HarshithJEE]

@@Aqdas_khan I think you don't have simple common sense it's correct and even small kids can understand this first strengthen up your basics and stop playing games or else you will suffer in maths in higher class or if u don't take maths after 10th physics is also there don't forget it🤣

[@omkondawar5899]

@@HarshithJEE absolutely

[@omkondawar5899]

He don't even know BODMAS

[@HarshithJEE]

@@omkondawar5899 yes they are all brainless people

[@intelligentgamer2270]

We have to solve bracket first

[@f.a._cobra_6275]

My friends almost killed me when I proved this to them 🤣

[@CovenantShalomKile]

Any number outside the bracket MUST be multiply with any number inside the bracket. In this case the number inside the bracket does not have any value but its known as a number and that is ZERO(0), hence 4x(0)=5x(0) is equivalent to 0=0. Well that's what i can thought of judging from my past maths.

[@loknathsaha9393]

"O divided by 0" is not equal zero. According to this rule, 0 cannot be cancel out from both side. The trick is here.

[@flashfighter8444]

Cup

[@flashfighter8444]

Kar

[@loknathsaha9393]

Sorry, I cannot understand what you are saying

[@priyamshah7489]

@Aanchal Parmar he is saying that you can't simplify or remove 0÷0 , he tricked us here

[@loknathsaha9393]

@@priyamshah7489 Thank u, this is what I want to tell.

[@ishaangupta5936]

When you eliminated (5-5) you're basically just making the lhs=(5-5)/(5-5) Since 5-5 is zero and anything divided by zero is undefined, you can basically prove anything with the help of this

[@qhse.kasiviswamviswanath6773]

Not possible

[@sujatharevu9763]

Ishaan gupta...is correct

[@herobrine9739]

According to Bodmas , firstly we have to solve brackets and in this situation in lhs (5-5)/(5-5) we have to solve brackets first and its next situation is 0/0 and u can divide the zero with zero and its answer is 0 1,2,3,,,

[@herobrine9739]

I think his mistake is that why he choose the rhs 25-25 not 20-20

[@socialdistancing6855]

Man why are you taking it so seriously 🤣🤣

[@santoshbhat4722]

We can not cancel (5_5) on both sides ,as per BODMAS rule we have to solve numerals in bracket first . If we have 3a=2a ,this doesn't mean that 3=2

[@ISabir-tq7nz]

😂😂😂op bro

[@billimanucato1986]

4:24 I can't stop my laugh on his laugh its soo funny 🤣

[@sahulaxmijeevanlal7283]

You have not followed the rule of (bodmas) 4(5-5) = 5 (5-5) 4×0 = 5×0 0 = 0 You have not done(skipped) this step

[@santoshtalukdar1975]

Tor matha

[@adrijnayak6814]

After seeing I be like Me : bro what is maths

[@tinchilee-qe6ke]

Person: and this is why it's 5- Me: If there is 2 apples in 2 boxes and I put them together, how many are there? Person: uhhhhhhhhhh 4? Me: exactly, so 2+2=4 not 5 bruh.

[@aunixia8604]

My mom says I should respect everyone's opinions. Their opinions:

[@arashghasemzadeh2219]

Loooooool fucking cool one

[@arashghasemzadeh2219]

@Maths by Mehra sorry I don't understand, speak English please

[@zakiasultana5287]

@SSC Maths I understand

[@chandrakala840]

@@arashghasemzadeh2219 r bhai tu बालक है😂😂😂

[@arashghasemzadeh2219]

@@chandrakala840 English or Persian dude