2,800 Year Old Treasure Found!

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

This is nothing personal towards any archaeologists out there. Just my own personal views to show how strongly I feel about how certain people in the world have the right to dig up treasures of the dead yet some of us with a metal detector are not even allowed to dig up treasure in many places which are not graves. One rule for one walk of life and one rule for another. The world and its rules are joke worthy.

[@C...G...]

Deep Digger Dan it is what it is

[@shiTthebed86]

Who gives these people permission to dig anywhere they like?

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

The governments who profit from everything they find.

[@dennismaxfield4936]

I metal detect and avoid cemeteries. How much of the treasure found it's way into there pockets,

[@willsmith1539]

I suppose the difference between grave robbing and archaeology is that grave robbing is for personal gain and will only be seen by a small group of individuals where as archaeologists dig it up and usually it is sent to museums for the general public to enjoy and see a taste of previous cultures. Whilst this is not much better than grave robbing at least it helps us better understand and preserve the past even though digging up graves no matter how old is wrong. This doesn't necessarily reflect my views.

[@jeremeygloyd2894]

I’m an Iraqi veteran I was sent there right after September 11 and I think that is incredible what they’re doing with the soldiers not only do they get to keep working and keep a sense of pride but they’re out in the field contributing like they always do! Thank you for the video that’s amazing. I’m sad to find out that your channel has ended and I just found it but I’ll keep watching.

[@eringemini7091]

Aloha Dan! ...Because they don't melt it down, & make off with it, rather, they clean it up,restore it to mint condition, study it to find out more about the people of those times, then place it in a museum in its country of origin for current/future generations to enjoy?

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

so you wouldn't have a problem if they dug your grandmothers grave up to take and preserve a ring off her finger so they could record the history and display it in a local museum?

[@eringemini7091]

Deep Digger Dan Aloha Dan! I think these are 2 different things. Something that is 2,800 yrs old is from a time of "Antiquity" (before the middle ages). Archaeologist s & Anthropologists do not have a whole lot of "material" items left from most civilizations, obviously because of time, decay, grave robbers, earth quakes, weather, etc. Grave robbers steal, and melt down or sell for profit the items they find in the grave. Archaeologists see wealth in knowledge, and the knowledge that we humans learn about our cultural past. It was a lot worse about 100 yrs ago, quite often, these treasures were taken out of their country of origin, often never telling the home govts. Now, not only do they go into a museum in that country of origin, often if the find is culturally spectacular, teaching us new things about a civilization or a people that we knew nothing or little of, often many people worldwide get to enjoy this new knowledge through the museum touring their collections.

[@welshrelics2983]

I think they're going to take it to preserve and show in a museum.

[@garethwhite3601]

Dan o Dan this is why I love you from the time I Found you camping I never got metal detectorin before I found your Chanel but you are a boss mate.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

with no employees lol

[@nickelmickel4170]

This is a good format.i love these types of videos.look forward to many more.

[@heartforwon]

Very thought provoking video and can completely understand your views. a lot to think about there!

[@justinwells7264]

I think it's so the treasure can go to a museum and the museum can then rob the public of an admission fee to see it.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

lol It seems robbery goes on through all the ranks until it comes to the people who ultimately pay the money to see these grave treasures.

[@paolafrege7766]

Apart from gold i don't like the idea of disturbing dead people, who gave them the right to touch their bodies and to look at them as they were "things" to be studied....

[@panzeralienofficial]

I have a suggestion for you. Do a fishing Channel, or turn this into one! This channel was build of excitement. I loved all these videos. Your personality is golden as well. (Congrats on the 27 btw 🥳). Fishing is not hard on the knees, and i think you will love it! I would love to see you catch a huge Pike, or a Seat Trout. You can also use the other Channel you started for it, the name is fitting. Trust me ob this one, it will be huge in no time!

[@TheAlmdal]

It would be really great if you linked your news source so we could read the articles and/or study's you report on. Great vid Dan!!

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

If the news sources had any more information I promise I would have done just that but I have shared every single fact that came out of the reports last night and there was nothing more to be read or seen. This video covers all the information available.

[@TheJeffSnickers]

It would still be great to know the source of your information.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

TheJeffSnickers Google it.

[@cday131]

The problem with just ignoring these finds is this was before written history and even most of that is lost to time. This is the only way to even glimpse how things were that far back. The evidence isn't getting any less degraded over time. To ignore it now is to willingly let what little pieces of ancient history we can find, die forever. I can understand how an archaeologist of all kinds of people, wouldn't be inclined to let that happen.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

The evidence, as you call it, isn't getting any more degraded either. Gold does not degrade. This isn't about the gold, history or treasure. This is about morality and letting the dead rest in peace with the items their family and friends wished to be placed in the ground with them.

[@davidhaines8166]

Sounds pretty spot on Dan, they should leave these people to rest. Thanks and keep us updated plz.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

R.I.P.

[@kristengann6864]

I think it's different because they are trying to learn about these people so they can better document history they are also trying to preserve it as much as possible same thing with their bodies. I can see where you are coming from but they aren't selling this stuff off for personal gain on the black market never to be seen again, I think of it more as working out who these people were and how they lived and died and what their lives we're like. Good video I like this concept. 🙂

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

But they didn't get permission from the people who put the items there to dig them up. They may not have wanted future generations to learn from their treasure offerings. If they did they would have left them above ground surely. One last thing I'd like to say is....yes....they are doing it for personal gain. They get paid wages to do this. This is their jobs, their income. Thank you for the great input and comment. I'm not having a go at you, I really liked your input. :-)

[@kristengann6864]

Deep Digger Dan I can see that too, I think both sides have valid points, Here in the states when someone comes across Native American graves they call out the state archaeologist come out and catalog everything exactly where it was found and when they are done they put it all back just as they found it and then it is a protected site and no one can dig there anymore even if it's on someone's property , if they are going to dig up things I think that is how they should do it. I actually had a friend who this happened to they were clearing trails for riding their 4 wheelers and came across 2 large mounds covered with rocks, they called the local police to come look because they thought they were burial mounds and the police agreed so they called the proper people to come catalog it . Also I'm loving all of the videos I know I've said it before, but I watch all of them you guys are awesome! Keep up the good work ☺️

[@wrxs1781]

Dan you have posed a very good question, insomuch they were interned with the expectation of an everlasting resting place, they have been desecrated. As you see in Egypt the archaeologist lay blame to tomb robbers, but them in themselves are grave robbers.

[@pauliegee78]

Thanks for the scoop Dan, take care brother

[@Karen-mk6sq]

It's grave robbing. Not like it's just random forgotten treasure. Love your intro and closer!

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

Thanks Karen :-)

[@Karen-mk6sq]

You're welcome!

[@willsmith1539]

I suppose the difference between grave robbing and archaeology is that grave robbing is for personal gain and will only be seen by a small group of individuals where as archaeologists did it up and usually it is sent to museums for the general public to enjoy and see a taste of previous cultures. Whilst this is not much better than grave robbing at least it helps us better understand and preserve the past even though digging up graves no matter how old is wrong.

[@fordman7479]

Will Smith but is most cases if its a significant find it sits in storage where only a few important people can access it, and in a lot of cases fakes are put on display instead.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

Personally I simply frown upon things like this because they haven't got the permission of the people who put them there. They were not placed there for someone to dig them up in the future, whether that be a grave robber or an archaeologist. They should be left to do the job they were placed there to do and that is either be a gift to the deceased to see them through their next life or a gift to the gods.

[@willsmith1539]

I agree Dan graves should be left alone. I was just suggesting a reason why they are not branded grave robber.

[@sagemode7273]

Damn Thiefs , Sorry I Mean Archaeologists

[@johnhickey7688]

I understand what your saying Dan, however, the main difference would be: Robbers recklessly dig for personal profit. They have little or no interest in the history or the archaeological context. More often than not, the finds, which may include gems, gold or other precious items are just sold on to collectors, or worse still, melted down or broken up for monetary value. Robbers are certainly not archaeologists. Not only do we lose the finds themselves, but we also lose the historical context of the grave and the placement of the grave goods. Archaeologists dig carefully and slowly, recording all the context of the grave, not just the items of monetary value. They operate under licence and as such the items will, in most cases end up on display for future generations to view and learn about their ancestral past. I suppose the real question should be: Why are you digging up mounds that we know are graves? The answer is fairly simple. People have robbed graves for financial gain for thousands of years. They do not care about the history or context of the burial. Today the problem has been made worse as we have the equipment and knowledge to discover where these finds are likely to be, and at what depth. Robbers will always be robbers and the history is then lost forever. Is there a right or wrong? The first is essentially robbing graves, The second is robbing graves to secure the historic items for both education and for future generations. They attempt to complete the task before the Robber beats them to it.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

If the problem is grave robbery then surely the answer is to protect the graves from the robbers, not send in more robbers. The monetary or historical value isnt important here. Surely the respect for the dead is what should be being preserved first and foremost.

[@johnhickey7688]

Yes would be the simple answer. The problem is this is extremely unlikely as it would be nearly impossible to achieve. Your example with the badgers is another good example of the experts having to step in before everything is lost or pilfered.

[@killercoins8750]

Great video good job dan!

[@Kevin_40]

being buried with gold is selfish. why not share it with the living....

[@Spicy_Riker]

The most reliable news source on the Internet (after PewNews)

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

I don't like coming second lol

[@roobydoowho4280]

@@DeepdiggerdanNet Neither does your missus!

[@TimHarrison1]

Love this video 😆 ...Seriously though, this always goes through my head when I see archaeology like this. I suppose it depends whether there are any living family still existing, otherwise one way of looking at it is that it's simply forgotten precious metals and artefacts buried there, wasting away for eternity.

[@wrnchhead76]

I don't have a horse in this race, and I love ya Dan. My opinion is that the difference between an archaeologist and a guy with a metal detector is that often I would *assume* that nothing would be cataloged or studied. It's placement etc and the history of the item is lost. I believe the goal of archaeology is science more than it is treasure hunting.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

So why do they keep digging up treasures if it is science? Any lawful metal detectorist has to report treasures found so they can be catalogued and studied.

[@Blaze_The_Fire_Wolf]

Nice video Dan! This is quite messed up that archeologists would disturb the dead. I’d say place the gold in the museum not their remains.

[@1tulip]

That thumbnail though. I thought it was Deep Fried Dan doing rabbits.

[@damianjones7554]

Hello Dan, robbery in ancient times is worst because around the time of the thefts there will have been family, friends or even if a few generations after the death, still people left around to care. It's not, or rather shouldn't be considered theft in modern times simply because so much time has passed that there is nobody left to object and the grave has become considered historic or of historic significance. It may need digging up to record it and to save the treasures for future generations to learn from. I totally understand why you hate the idea of exhumation you wouldn't be human not to feel some sadness even if the person who's grave it is died thousands of years ago, ancestors should be respected and the fact you have respect for that is a credit to you.

[@MRZRSPSOfficial]

ive always asked that question :D :D

[@briandaniels2377]

Better to have the archeologists dig it up and put it in a museum than a thief.you’ll never see it again,I would think

[@nsein001]

Those who write the history gets to choose the spin of the story. With modern tech, they should not need to disturb the sites.

[@TheJeffSnickers]

Yes, but modern tech is expensive and archaeologists don't have the lobby to get these funds all the time.

[@happyquails]

I would enjoy sharing photos or video of my collection with you.

[@danielodonovan512]

Great upload Dan we love you in Ireland my son say,s your the man

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

Your son is a very intelligent young man. I AM the man! lol :-D

[@michaelcline3123]

Mr Dan . You're spot on. Plus what gets me. Is the graves of WW2 soldiers.are being dug up and there not nearly as old. I've hunted civil war sites and was afraid I'd dig up a soldier by accident.my grandpaw found the remains of a union soldier . On top of a mountain in 1965. He got ahold of the police and forest service. Who sent him back to his home state. Best they could figure he was from Kentucky.

[@workwithnature]

Kinda the reason is because they dig stuff up to find out about history and teach that to the world. The problem is that if they find something special and put it back well then some people might dig it up at night and take it for personal gain. Maybe melt down the gold etc... Good news flash though ;)

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

Why are they digging stuff up to learn about history though? Do they have permission from the dead and their relatives? No. They are making decisions for them because they are all dead and their opinion of their days no longer matters.

[@workwithnature]

100% agree with you. I personally don't think it is OK to disturb the dead. It lacks respect. If they could find a better way to get at the history, then that would be good.

[@William_Hada]

Excavation of graves is one of the few ways that we can find out details about our ancient history. I think humanity's present and future are enriched by this information. To get the most information from these excavations it should be performed by trained individuals who properly document the finds and publish the details so that everyone can benefit from the information. When untrained individuals do it valuable information is lost and the motive usually is personal greed. The only one who benefits is the untrained finder. They definitely are " robbers " in the sense that they are robbing all humanity of its rich history when not properly documenting the finds.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

So archaeologists do not get a wage? They all work for free and live off grass and water? Is historical learning more important than showing respect for the dead? Thank you for your lovely comment. :-)

[@TheJeffSnickers]

We do get a wage, but it's not measured in the amount of gold we find. Also it's very rare to find gold. It never really happens. These finds are so rare. And the wage is very low by the way. We do it infact for the love of knowledge. But we also have respect. You might not see it as respect, but it's for each individual to decide how we handle it. But I agree, it's a grey area which is still discussed in the scientific community.

[@William_Hada]

Deep Digger Dan I am for respecting the living. Once you are dead you will not know if someone is disrespecting you or not. I, myself will gladly condone any disturbance of my grave if it helps or benefits future generations in some way. Are organ donors disrespected when their organs are harvested to help the living? Because after I'm dead I am of no use to anyone living and will not be aware of anything after that. I don't understand why you are against Archeologists getting paid for the work they do.

[@locouk]

You need a female reporter on location who you can hand over to.

[@rbeck3200tb40]

Dan it depends on what the people do with the things they dig up . If they put them in a museum and study them they are archeologists and not stealing . If they sell them to make money then its robbery Get it ?

[@typeanutt]

Dan I understand what you're saying it's a double edged sword! A hundred years from now they will be call thief's but now it's a person with a PhD saying its science of the past! No its money driven, book deals, movie deals, TV deals, money Grant's, etc. I have in a box native American artifacts that my mom found in the late 40's as a kid, stuff I found around lakes when I was a kid in the 70's some have been in museums! Some haven't Oklahoma has a state law all native American artifacts have to be returned!! But as I found out the loophole is back to the tribe it came from!!!??? Out of all my stuff only 1 was identified as Cherokee! Lots of red tape!! Then I couldn't give it away!! Told no monetary value!!! I know this probably don't help, but for this person I tried!!!

[@jeffconnery5836]

I fully agree that grave digging is a terrible thing for anyone to do.!

[@FordFracture]

Bravo Dan it is in fact ROBBERY ! I hope in 2000 years the saka people dig up our kings and queens and steal all their gold .

[@MLA56]

Ok. As an old retired historian & archaeologist, let me explain the difference.... archaeologists excavate such things so they can be preserved and studied by scholars worldwide, and placed in museums for the public to view. It has ZERO to do with the financial value. "Treasure hunters," "relic hunters," and others of that ilk do it purely for what they can sell it for. To hell with the historical importance regarding the culture they came from. An archaeologist, historian, or even a responsible detectorist's first thought when he uncovers something is, "What can we learn from this? What does it tell us?" A "relic hunter" or "treasure hunter's" first thought is, "What's it worth?" There's a vast, huge distance between the two.

[@zernadarkwolf]

I'm so torn. I'm all for discovering the past through exploration but.... Ehh. It's so difficult as I could care less if thousands of years later someone found something historically exciting in my grave. At least these are being learned from. But at the same time, your right, we don't have the same rules which...kinda sucks.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

Yes but just because you or myself might not care if someone digs us up, that doesn't mean the people in these particular graves wouldn't have minded. Unless we know (which we never will) if they would consent to being dug up then surely we should leave them in peace. Thanks for your lovely comment.

[@kinghousebd4748]

It’s a bit better because they use what they find to learn about the past and finds are not usually sold. So I don’t really think it’s stealing

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

Tell that to the poor person who's grave it is or their family and friends who placed the objects in the graves to help see them on their journey to the next life......oh sorry....you can't because they are dead and don't have a say or opinion anymore. Thank you for your lovely comment. :-)

[@DiaryofaGrimReaper]

It is a controversial moral question. Spirits know they are dead. They are intelligent. They learn, read, see colors, and understand they will never get their bodies back, their bodies will never be repaired, and that the things they had are useless to them. Even if they stood right next to a archaeologist, and watched him pull it out of the ground, they would more than likely be ecstatic, that they got to see something that belonged to them so long ago, one last time. They can't do anything with it, they know that.But to see it again, and remember a time, that is what is priceless, Dan. The memory that item may invoke. Scenario 2) The spirit resides in the pineal gland. Which is why it as worshiped in Egyption times, it is " the eye of RA" cut in half, referred to as "the 3rd eye". Before death, your brain changes frequencies, to gather as much energy as it, can to release your spirit. During this time, you are alert, you more alert than you have ever been in your life, you hear, you smell, but it doesn't last long. Your spirit either has enough energy to get out of the skull, or it didn't, in which case, you ARE the spirit who was buried 2,800 years ago. Darkness, quiet, no light, no friends, no one to talk to, if you are really lucky, I find you. And I become your friend, and you will tell me who you were, what happened, your culture, your people.... Without me, you have nothing, buried in that coffin, Dan. you only EXIST your own thoughts to drive you crazy. I give you a week with yourself, you'll go mad =) No sense of time, alone in the darkness.... One day, a VERY LONG TIME LATER... You hear DIGGING. SOMEONE IS COMING TO LET YOU OUT!!!! THEY HEARD DEEP DIGGER DAN HAS WORLD WAR II RELICS, AND REFUSED TO LET GO OF ANYTHING, SO HE HAD EVERYTHING BURIED WITH HIM. They pull your box out, all the sounds if your precious junk, and all you care about is not getting stuck in any of it. The first time in 2,800 years, you see a light, Dan,they take off the lid and your spirit absorbs all the light it can, as you raise up out of that box, and you are FREE! Do you really give a shit about your rusty junk? Or would you rather go back in the box for another 2,800 years? YOU got out, because they found your box of rusty metals and clad coins worth something. This is the story of millions of spirits. Many were not even buried with their bodies, but trapped in garbage, and thrown away, with no chance of escape.Spirits need energy. WITHOUT ENERGY,THEY ARE TRAPPED. THIS is how it is, Dan. I am the real Grim Reaper. I guide the spirits through the afterlife. And they don't care, ans long as you respect them.

[@DiaryofaGrimReaper]

Spirits have told me where they buried money, they have even tried to use it if I could help them, I could have it. It is unfortunate, many times a spirit is unhelpable, an I know spirits all over the world.. Time is their keeper, and when a spirit makes a mistake, it is not forgiving. A spirit crossing a busy road will get eaten by a car. It is that simple.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

I see a lot of personal opinions here. Guessing what the dead would wish for or believe. I think that is something that nobody is entitled to do on their behalf. If we do not know if they would be happy for their graves to be disturbed then we should leave them alone.

[@DozaCraft]

I miss this segment!

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

Plenty more to come :-)

[@paulwest3583]

so my question is how do you spell archae-thieve-olo-robbers-gist?

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

close enough lol

[@20greeneyes20]

You are so right I have thought the same thing Dan. And yet put their dead bodies in museums to be gawked at. How can that be ok ? Ancient or not a grave is a grave it's wrong no matter how old. Morally wrong......

[@furface9779]

Rest in piece "RIP" has evolved to rest without your pieces, morality has changed

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

When I die I am leaving instructions for a Raiders Of The Lost Ark type grave to be made. If they make it through all the obstacles they have my full consent to take my entire grave goods which consist of 4 buttons on my shirt, my stained underpants and the flesh off my fat arse.

[@plasticbutcher]

If your dog digs up a dinosaur bone..does that make him a " Barkaeologist" ?? Inquiring minds want to know. Keep up the great work Dan and thank you for taking us along on your adventures Rick B aka Plastic butcher

[@pattyfarghaly1821]

Wow.

[@NickMusselle]

i can see your argument, however, archaeologists have to record these finds and exactly where the relics are found and write reports on the dig. also in this country they are put in musiums, not alowed to be sold on the open market.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

They are SOLD to the museums.

[@NickMusselle]

ok Dan, sorry i didnt know that. i thought they were naturaly given after investigation. so do the Archeologists get the money?

[@OldiesGoodies]

Maybe the Gold is just an extra bonus locating the life and times of the ancients to gain alien technology maybe that is what Archaeologists might actually be looking for but I think that its the Gold They are after by default. Win Win....

[@Lacombe57]

Robbery is for profit, benefiting only the immediate few. And it in the process discards and destroys historical and cultural information. Archaeology on the other hand strives to preserve the past. Which becomes available to and benefits all of mankind. You and I can eventually learn from archaeological finds. When I was in my early twenties I was in my thinking extremely fortunate to be able to see a traveling exhibition that came to my hometown, displayed at the New Orleans Museum of Art in New Orleans ,Louisiana. This wouldn't have happened if the "find" had been robbed. The exhibition was on the road so to speak, while a proper museum was being build to house the exhibit. And certainly some of the admissions fees to the exhibitions at the various museums hosting the tour aided in the building of that future museum. The exhibition I'm speaking of was the Treasures of Tutankhamen which among other objects included the well known gold death mask. I couldn't afford to travel to Egypt to see that exhibit in the museum that now exist, built specifically for that collection.

[@Katseye102]

This can open a lot of conversation! Another side is what about the things that are metal detected? Some “hordes” that are found? Jars of coins, precious metals that are buried? Should we leave them there after someone has buried them because they are gone from this time? Just saying Deep Digger Dan! Your not stealing, your preserving history for others to enjoy! Goes both ways I think. ❤️❤️❤️ you Dan!

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

A grave can hardly be compared to digging up a hoard of coins. Thats a silly comparison.

[@PegasusBridge1]

Am I the only one that thinks it’s BLINDINGLY obvious what the difference is? If they were ‘robbers’ - you wouldn’t have set eyes on these pieces, you wouldn’t have any idea they’d been found - they would just have been melted / sold off on the black market.

[@whiteelephantvideos1343]

Is this an example of what you call taking the Mickey out of the archaeologist LOL

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

I'm not clever enough to do something like that. :-)

[@robertshemory5094]

No difference 😎👍💰

[@RomAugTW]

Once something like this is known if they(archaeologists) don't remove it then guards will have to be posted there 24/7 since there are people out there who would also like to remove(steal) it for their own purposes($$$) and wouldn't lose a nights sleep over it.

[@peterphoenix6471]

the difference between theft and archaeology is institutional approval...

[@mikerhodes9198]

This is something I absolutely agree with you. Funny how the archaeologists don't see the irony of what they do as compared to grave robbers. These were important loved ones in their community and they had every right to be left alone as they intended to be for eternity. I wonder what the archaeologists would say if someone went out and dug up their grand parents (in the name of science)?

[@TheJeffSnickers]

Happens. Dude it's a dead body. What ever was human is long gone. I hope you do realize that our grandparents graves will be destroyed at one point or another to have space again for someone new to get buried. All of our graves probably. That doesn't mean that archaeologists don't have respect for the people who they are excavating.

[@brynmcavinchey-mills8977]

Arguably removing the artefacts now is not robbery as they will be correctly documented and made available for research, furthermore the argument would be due to the age of the artefacts and the people they belonged to, it makes the artefacts world heritage artefacts. Meaning they can shed light on human development in the past, which is responsible for shaping society today. Once the artefacts have been documented and appropriately researched there's nothing stopping them being redeposited. Also if the artefacts had been removed in antiquity they would surley have been sold privately and been poorly documented, making it likely that the artefacts wouldn't be in one collection and with all the pieces being intact.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

The properly documented Sutton Hoo discovery is a good example of the point lm about to make. Found and documented by modern day archaeologists yet l have seen artifacts from the discovery in 5 different museums. They will clearly never be reunited as one. However, my main concern and point lm trying to get across is that nobody, whoever they are, has the right to disturb someones grave unless they left instructions for that to be done whilst they were alive.

[@cynthiaweathers6979]

Robbers sell treasures for personal gain. Archaeologists record for history and the treasures go to a museum for the public to enjoy.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

What about the dead peoples graves they are stealing from? Does it not matter that their graves and bodies are removed? Do they not deserve to rest in peace? Is it more important for the public to enjoy going to museums and seeing skeletons and their grave goods than them being left alone to rest in peace?

[@crafty1444]

Totally agree dano, modern day grave robbing is very kool and trendy and ok if you go to collage and tell each other it's fine if your in a school or your local government to GRAVE ROB. but if you or i do it the unclean majority we will go to prison for a very long time.

[@kencarter190]

Grave robbery is grave robbery any grave old or new Ken U.K.

[@leesanzo6355]

You are correct......

[@Rockhounding-with-Bigfoot]

I could use some more treasure

[@thooke222]

Well what should they have done? Thrown the gold back in the ground and shoveled some dirt over it?

[@almontepaolilli4909]

It is shameful that they not only take the treasure and relics of graves but disturb the bodies of those laid to rest a long time ago!

[@randomclips7970]

This is not fake news

[@cvtataryn]

Jesus, I think comments made me dumber.....

[@R.Lennartz]

Glorified grave robbers

[@danweiss1371]

Amen Dan. I Agree with your thoughts on the archaeologist if it is cool and old they get the right to do as they please in the name of history of coarse!!!!. But if I go metal detecting in state forest and find a 1950 button or even a penny I am required to turn it into the state ? Even though we the taxpayers own the state forest I have to turn in to their greedy little hands. Just venting. Great video Dan

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

That 1950s button could change history. Its very important that they control you and don't let you feel like you are entitled to do anything which you enjoy. Thank you for your lovely comment. Dan :-)

[@bud_of_death]

The way i see it if they left the gold someone else would actually steal it, i hope its actually donated to a local museum not sold. Ultimately i wish they hadn't dug up the graves

[@Talmurid]

This is basically the same deal as the excavation of the Terracotta Army, except that the burial tomb was never unearthed. Since this has gotten much less press that that of the former find, i'm not surprised that the ethics of the Archeologists are less than trustworthy. It is a shame that the gold and jewelry is being made a priority find over other finds, like scripts, or documented information thart might tell how the common day was for a human living in that area. I personally believe that the crisies in the Midle East should be resolved before more damage is done towards the quest for knowledge of the past.

[@TheJeffSnickers]

What? Gold and jewelry isn't made a priority. In fact it's not common to find it at all. What we usually find are sherds or w.e. Scripts or texts or documented information of any kind is only found in cultures who were able to produce them. Which weren't that many. The problem here is that these finds don't get much attention, but if someone finds gold or something like that it's on the news. It's not the fault of archaeologists, it's the media.

[@xXSKAVENXx]

HOLY CRAP MATE YA HIT THE MOTHER LOAD!

[@mirsad96]

Without archeologists, historical events would be very hard to verify and it would mostly be "he said, she said". Did you form your option from watching Indiana Jones movies? Because those are parodies of archeologists. They don't go treasure hunting, they go information gathering.

[@jackiesmithsmetaldetecting]

I think it is terrible that they dig them up and take away precious things there loved ones sent them on there journey with , I know after 100 years a grave can be reused ( not sure if they bury on top of that and this worries me also as my late Father last person known was from a grave 500 years ago) no archaeologist dug this ground but just another thought , also it is a big can of worms , not heard of that story yet Dan

[@wildben]

I don't disagree with your stand on Robbery, however. Is it classed as Theft if they are dug up and sold on for personal gain. After all it wasn't their property in the first place. Whereas the archaeologists dig them up to learn more about these people and put them on display for others to see. Therefor not for financial gain. Just a thought.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

ALL these archaeological finds ARE sold on to the museums, private collectors, highest bidders or stolen. They do result in financial gain. Archaeologists do not live on grass and water. They buy things in life. How? By being paid to do this.

[@SouthCoastDetecting]

I’m with you Dan, theft.

[@Wolfhound.]

im with you dan sound like a load of grave robbers to me

[@nobeldestroyer1120]

Seems like Dan isn't happy about this...

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

lol are you?

[@nobeldestroyer1120]

No, they should never have taken the gold from the ancient burials, we would not like it if an anglo saxon king was found and all his treasure which was taken and distributed among various people!

[@juliepownall2000]

l think it's awful taking stuff from graves the remains of people should rest in peace ✌

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

Thank you for your lovely comment. :-)

[@warinjayne253]

robbery is robbery no matter the date or time!

[@TheSWolfe]

I've always been on the fence re the ethics of cultural anthropology, i.e. what constitutes grave-robbing & what does not, what situations warrant return of items in museums, universities, & personal collections to the descendants, representative cultures, & modern-day countries from which these artifacts were discovered, removed, or stolen, & the criteria by which such claims should be weighed (& who should be in charge of judging said claims). Tomb-raiding, war-time sacking of museums & universities (whose own artifact claims are often dubious), & archeological digs, are just a few situations resulting in the destruction, hoarding, or sale of contents by/to various entities, each claiming valid rights of ownership. In a perfect world, discovered artifacts could be returned to descendants of the original owners/artisans/cultures involved, but most situations are much more complicated than that; plus, enter government bureaucracy over archeological sites in question, awa organizations sponsoring expeditions, & things become even murkier. If these powerful entities cannot agree upon rights of ownership in matters of such cultural/historical import, who will champion the poor citizen wielding a metal detector in his own backyard or on public property to his/her rights to keep what he/she finds eh? Finders/keepers ain't as simple as it once was, as rules go.

[@onhawaii]

Dan, and what about all the gold the Spanish people did rob from the Inka and Maya that sunk in a ship? They claim it is theirs to the ones that found the stolen gold in the sunken ship. Should it not have been returned to the people that it was stolen from in the first place? I think if you cant bent the rules to that what fits your self the best you are just to honest.

[@AbandonedNorthJersey]

Kazi gold

[@groovedodger]

You are a treasure Dan is that news?

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

cor thanks :-)

[@markviereck4547]

Now, if these archeologists keep the treasure , they are thieves.. if they put the treasure in a museum the are OK. King Tuts treasure was put in a museum in Egypt. ,, I think you got my drift.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

It is NEVER ok to take grave goods for whatever reason...whoever you are or where ever they end up. They are gifts from families to the deceased or the gods.

[@harol-ol4qy]

Hi

[@terryhall9159]

Agree

[@FXGreggan.]

If they dig up a grave for examination and they find gold - of course they should put the gold in a museum and not put it back in the ground, graverobbing is taking it and selling it for profit, in my humble oppinion...

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

It is a rather humble one.

[@raymondcline8194]

Dan I agree with you> But I also believe in Karma, nuf said........

[@stephaniebattersby4556]

because if they didnt Save these treasures for us to veiw and talk about most civilisations would be lost to us and you wouldnt be telling us about them in this blog

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

I'd rather not know about it and the dead still be resting in peace than know all about it and their bodies dug up.

[@ntygrty2924]

archeologists have license to steal.

[@davemarshal2214]

It's 004 knocking on the Grave Door lmao

[@janicebowie4738]

It was Need when they stole the gold 2,000 years ago but now it's Greed simple Dan.x

[@diggumdetecting3369]

You cheeky git! Hahaha! Love your treasure news episodes, Dan! I noted that you no longer have a costar to ogle. Afraid of your producer, are you?

[@tracyjamestavares3255]

What about the Nazi Train ?. We luv ya Dan

[@waynerobinson2656]

A Degree in something...

[@Martiandawn]

From the perspective of the folks who buried the treasure, there would be no difference between archeologists and common grave robbers. Our society considers the “robbery” to be justified by the noble pursuit of knowledge, but the tomb robbers of old no doubt considered their own theft to be justified as well.

[@DeepdiggerdanNet]

Thank you. I couldn't have put it better myself.