Should I do any more battles from the Ottoman Empire? Or Crusades? Let me know. Thanks to my Patreons: www.patreon.com/masterofroflness Discord: discord.gg/g2A92uCz6N
@dhestrahanif527010 ай бұрын
Battle of Mohacs?
@death-istic958610 ай бұрын
Love your videos!🩶
@Ben-jl2rh10 ай бұрын
Weird the Battle of Varna happened on my birthday
@barsboraguc433810 ай бұрын
Mate, you should definitely make a video on Ataturk, or Atachad (for such a person was a chad of his time considering his military & political successes as well as farsightedness ). Why Ataturk? Because he probably is one of the most influential person in Turkish history (I even saw a photo of it in the video “Persian history be like” sitting with Reza Shah Pahlavi in a car). By the way, memes are perfect tool for introducing history to beginners or people who struggle to understand history. For this I must express my sincere admiration for your work. May you prosper.
@jcduberry10710 ай бұрын
Battle of Lepanto ? Siege of Malta ?
@rafaelglopezroman111010 ай бұрын
This sums up why the crusades were so inept. They were basically tiny armies led by a local lord, force to work together with other tiny armies lead by rival lords. Add in the fact that they all spoke a 100 different languages and you get nothing more than angry mob.
@rafaelglopezroman111010 ай бұрын
The moment things whent south it was every lord for himself, and the armies would just scatter.
@merisius10 ай бұрын
Its just French tbh
@DarthFhenix5510 ай бұрын
Tbf at least the king of hungary (And thus Bohemia and Poland) knew what he was doing. In fact it was his death that precipitated the end of Byzantium since the crussade of Varma was the last chance to save the greeks.
@michaelweston40910 ай бұрын
True but the Muslims were never able to create a similar crusader force in the name of Islam that could push into the heart of Western Europe. They did do well at uniting the Muslims but even they had civil wars & fefnas
@Jones25ful10 ай бұрын
You take a look at how inept Austria-Hungary was in WW1, it’s like that times 10. With less logistics and …… actually probably the same quality roads.
@simpletrailers116110 ай бұрын
fun fact: the reason why beyazid ordered the killing of captives is because crusaders, on their way to nicopolis had taken a few towns and slain the surrendered garrisons.
@WolphL010 ай бұрын
Crusaders were generally looked at with extreme contempt by all Muslims. Even Saladin didn't tolerate Templars and Hospitallers and would have them executed almost immediately unless they converted to Islam.
@lws9810 ай бұрын
They didn't even have to be military garrisons, the crusaders razed every village they found killing many Balkan Christians who were mostly Orthodox, this behavior disgusted their own allies, they were supposed to liberate them from the Turks not from life,
@WolphL010 ай бұрын
@@lws98 There was also the Bosnian Crusade which was so brutal and horrifying that it made it easy for the conversion of the Bosniaks to Islam because the Ottoman conquerors treated them much better than what they considered to be their fellow Christian brethren, although they were dualistic heretics.
@mex_I.M10 ай бұрын
@@WolphL0Well yea given choice of turkish rule or departure from this world its not even that much of a choice. Mass conversions happened around that time.
@denizmergen41810 ай бұрын
@@WolphL0can you blame them
@nolancer597410 ай бұрын
Fun fact: Stefan Lazarevic actually did not even have to intervene in the Battle despite being an Ottoman vassal, but he came to the aid of the Turks anyway because he hated the thought of Hungarians ruling over Serbia more than the Turks. And his involvment was pretty crucial for the Turkish victory.
@sbd0310 ай бұрын
Yeah the only Serbs I respect. During Ankara battle, all of Ottoman soldiers were abandoned Bayezid but Serbian knights didn't.
@Setupthemabomb10 ай бұрын
The idea of a Balkan ethnic hated being ruled by other Balkan but welcomed outsider ruler is the most Balkan thing I've ever read.
@Otto1Bismarck10 ай бұрын
As a Turk, naturally I do not like Serbs in general, but the Serbs who did not abandon Bayezid in the Ankara battle in 1402 and the Serbs who fought with us in Nicopolis have my respect and love.
@deathdefyingowl10 ай бұрын
not all of them. Janissaries and troops from Beylik of Dulkadir stayed to the last.@@sbd03
@boranates132010 ай бұрын
@@sbd03 Genede Timur sikti
@avengerulsasuke581410 ай бұрын
"Wallachians and Transylvanians abandoned the field" I'm glad to know that my ancestors were not dumb.
@BoliceOccifer10 ай бұрын
*Looks at French knights* Yeah, I think it's time to leave
@Darthwgamer10 ай бұрын
Mine were just sail boats go 🌬🌬🌬
@Henry_TownshendSH410 ай бұрын
He who fights and runs away, may live to impale another day
@Famousagentman10 ай бұрын
@@Henry_TownshendSH4Mfs could've busted out the vampires at any time, but chose not to.
@podermon484510 ай бұрын
Knowing you lot they probably went through the camp treasure first
@QwertiusMaximus10 ай бұрын
Bayezid collecting ransoms for his prisoners "Thanks for the money, dummy."
@AntoineleRenard10 ай бұрын
And some of the prisoners died during the return After their family paid the ransom
@Mehmet_Ergin8 ай бұрын
This is quite normal, considering that there were no planes or trains in the Middle Ages and poor road conditions. @@AntoineleRenard
@korkukokusu83113 ай бұрын
@@AntoineleRenardthey came to fight , death is possible too
@KhalDrogo493Ай бұрын
Because That's Exactly What You Fucking Are, A Bunch Of Fucking Empty Headed Crusaders Who Paid Me Money, To Get Absolutely Nothing Out Of It, Thanks!
@gettinbaldWin7 ай бұрын
> Gather up with fellow 20 kingdoms > Build a superior army > Fight a single common enemy > Lose still > Pull up excuses
@alanxu39366 ай бұрын
@@aliraslanerNATO vs Russia right now.
@aegonthedragon73035 ай бұрын
Russia has basically been stalled into a war of attrition and if political bullshit wasn’t coming in to throw off aid for Ukraine the war would probably be going differently
@rezaulkarimkhan9794 ай бұрын
"Eh guys we actually had different ethnicities, eh guys we actually had the french, shut up mozlem turks did night raid, eh actually eh"
@captainprice14094 ай бұрын
Ottomans had slightly greater numbers
@AliSyed7114 ай бұрын
@@captainprice1409😂
@Zetact_10 ай бұрын
The Ottomans like, "I'd have thought Crusaders would have read their Bibles and realized that having dozens of groups all speaking different languages is a hindrance."
@MarkhasSteelfort10 ай бұрын
Based Tower of babel reference.
@hannibalburgers47710 ай бұрын
Except Ottomans made out of people who all speaking different languages and only reason this war was fought by mosly Turkish people in Ottomans is that the Ottomans quickly made an army mostly from the nearby Turkish settlements of Rumili
@Cub__10 ай бұрын
Oi oi oi
@thejackedbaker98239 ай бұрын
Bold of you to assume Crusaders were literates
@williamdavis95629 ай бұрын
@Zetact_ I'm not sure they'd say that because their army had just has many groups speaking different languages. That was the norm back then. Great comment either way.
@TheDualnuts10 ай бұрын
French being first one surrender isn’t meme, it’s family tradition.
@sonercetin756810 ай бұрын
rofl@@anonim7767
@orange842010 ай бұрын
French army is strong wannabes VS hating and make fun of frenches enjoyers
@foomiumperorosaurus806610 ай бұрын
@@orange8420 HAHAHAHAHA
@matejkundrik948210 ай бұрын
Napoleon would disagree
@Saucisse_Praxis10 ай бұрын
Also making every other beta country in Europe its bitch
@AwayWithYouVileBeggar10 ай бұрын
When you convinced 20 nations to fight the Ottomans but 1 of these nations is France. The Ottomans: The outcome was never really in doubt.
@extrusdnterre148510 ай бұрын
The game was ringed from the start
@lahire494310 ай бұрын
At the battle of Saint Gotthard in 1664, when seeing one unit of bearded and long-haired men who were destroying the Turkish lines, the grand Vizier Fazil Pasha asked "Who are these long haired young men?". "The French", his staff replied.
@Crisyx9110 ай бұрын
You do realize the reason they surrendered is because of poor communication and no one in the coalition to back them up
@squeaky20610 ай бұрын
@@Crisyx91Which only happened because the French and Burgundians charged recklessly instead of sticking to Sigismund's plan.
@ennui974510 ай бұрын
Which may or may not be related to the fact that France later became the friendliest of all the European great powers (not sure if I'd call it an alliance but it definitely was close to an alliance at least) with the Ottomans.
@raskolnikov704910 ай бұрын
For anyone wondering, yes, this is the same Sigismund that burns Skalitz. This battle is also mentioned in the game a few times.
@0Moh10 ай бұрын
We need kingdom come 2
@zahfa760810 ай бұрын
Henry's come to see us!
@elkingoh454310 ай бұрын
You mean, Sigismund of Luxembourg
@sousukesagara19310 ай бұрын
I feel quite hungry
@atakanpayman10 ай бұрын
@@elkingoh4543 Same guy.
@roddiaz980110 ай бұрын
Fun fact: City of Nicopolis would have surrendered only if the crusader hadnt masscared the previous town when they agreed the terms for safety with Sigsmund Edit: To clear it a little bit more, it was the remnants of the french part of the army that broke the agreement and massacred the population much to the horror and frustration of Sigsmund and other army commanders Also, these crusades were fought against Ottoman empire and are totally different from the one which were fought in Holy land(1095-1291)
@ireallycant441610 ай бұрын
Isn’t this just form the movie war of the heavens? Not historical accurate
@Taospark10 ай бұрын
@@ireallycant4416 Massacring the hell out of Jerusalem when they got there did happen and sure didn't help anyone who faced them want to give up easily.
@rhetoric517310 ай бұрын
Not historically accurate? It’s extremely well documented by those that were actually there@@ireallycant4416
@ireallycant441610 ай бұрын
@@Taospark buddy you mean killing the enemies? I hate that most people just accept that crusade did most atrocities when in fact it’s reverse…
@Skaedm10 ай бұрын
the crusaders were as barbaric as their german ancestoers@@ireallycant4416
@nenenindonu10 ай бұрын
Defeating a large Crusade with Serbians and former Christian boys known as Janissaries is just a next level Bayezid the Thunderbolt move
@revanofkorriban150510 ай бұрын
Janissaries were basically First Order stormtroopers, but very skilled. But it shouldn't be forgotten that they were taken from their families.
@ozan742710 ай бұрын
@@revanofkorriban1505 their families gave them(Of course its still blood tax for some of them) and literally bribed officals so they would be taken. Even Turks themsevles tried to bribe officials so they would get taken to the army because entering janissary training means more than being soldier u could become pasha etc. could get strong positions in state.
@Marcusianery10 ай бұрын
@@ozan7427 Yeah lets glorify the horde of Turks that ruined south eastern Europe.
@DarthFhenix5510 ай бұрын
@@ozan7427 I mean, tbf that sounds like slavery with more steps.
@WolphL010 ай бұрын
@@DarthFhenix55 It definitely is true that a lot of boys were taken from families against their will, but a lot were willingly given away since being a Janissary meant a really good life. They were also only recruited from poor families and often orphans as they'd be more willing.
@crownedorion548110 ай бұрын
This is probably the most unforgivable L the French has contributed. This is not a meme anymore, this is a histroical L.
@lahire494310 ай бұрын
Funnily, if the French had abandoned their allies in the heat of battle as the Wallachians did, you would say the same on the French.
@MK_ULTRA42010 ай бұрын
@@lahire4943 Bruhh the French were about to lure the other Crusaders into a trap like the Romans at the Battle of Cannae, or the French at the Battle of Agincourt. This is not a meme anymore, this is a historical L.
@lahire494310 ай бұрын
@@MK_ULTRA420 Complete BS. The Wallachians didn't even try. Their arrival could have turned the tide.
@MK_ULTRA42010 ай бұрын
@@lahire4943 Bruhh the French knights went up a hill to charge a feigned retreat when they knew the enemy had their own cavalry on standby. Maybe their combined forces could have broken the enemy line in half but that's assuming the Ottomans were dumber than they really were.
@dingusdean190510 ай бұрын
@@MK_ULTRA420It’s even worse when you remember Sigismund, who had experience with the enemy’s tactics, proposed a much better plan but the French knights wanted “le glory” so leeroy jenkins’d themselves instead of listening to the guy anyone with half a brain would’ve chosen to follow.
@josiptito941210 ай бұрын
the french's biggest nemesis isn't the english, but rather archery as a whole
@someone-ip4rf10 ай бұрын
Not really archery but mostly their small brains
@lahire494310 ай бұрын
@@someone-ip4rf The French literally won nearly every conflict they fought during the Middle-Ages. You shouln't talk about small brain when you're directly affected by this problem.
@someone-ip4rf10 ай бұрын
@lahire4943 I ain't saying they weren't a power house of the medieval age but most of their biggest losses comes from charging their most valuable units the knights directly straight to the whole enemy army
@lahire494310 ай бұрын
@@someone-ip4rf You don't win nearly all the conflicts you fought as well as dozens of great battles with small brains.
@RRRRRRRRRRR95610 ай бұрын
@@lahire4943so they left their brain at home sometimes?
@nenenindonu10 ай бұрын
After this victory the caliph in Cairo would address Bayezid as "Sultan-ı Iklim-i Rum" (Sultan of the Roman Lands), he had previously earned the title Thunderbolt after the Battle of Frenkyazisi in other words Bayezid was earning titles every battle
@rord829910 ай бұрын
The problem is that the title of Sultan of Rûm attracted the attention of a little angry gentleman, who had a club foot and a very big army...
@nenenindonu10 ай бұрын
@@rord8299 Can't imagine the title Bayezid might've earned had he won in Ankara ...
@mukhtarsyajaratun102510 ай бұрын
@@nenenindonu idk like "The Khan Slayer"?
@Brutian9610 ай бұрын
He was earning titles until he met Tamerlane...
@kusturucu101510 ай бұрын
@@mukhtarsyajaratun1025Except he was also a khan himself
@orion586910 ай бұрын
"[French] knights came uner heavy fire from archers" Not again...
@konstantinriumin265710 ай бұрын
Let's hope they learned their lesson and won't make the same mistake in 15th century
@ProjectEkerTest3310 ай бұрын
English people miles away: Suddenly I feel really happy about this day...
@lahire494310 ай бұрын
@@konstantinriumin2657 By the time the battle of Nicopolis happened, the English had been completely expelled from France. The English invaded again in 1415. They lost every battle they fought against the French between 1429 and 1453.
@archivesoffantasy556010 ай бұрын
@@lahire4943But Henry V was undefeated, married the French king’s daughter and became the heir to the throne as stated in the Treaty of Troyes. So it was lucky for Charles VII that Henry V died when he did.
@rarescevei826810 ай бұрын
The arrow fire did almost nothing to the French in this battle as their armour had advanced in quality.
@mattiaslime892610 ай бұрын
And yet another instance of ''everything was going fine until the french.....''
@Crisyx9110 ай бұрын
More like everything was going fine until Hungarians and others decided to stay passive and not provide any help to the french whatsoever
@zerosuitsamus234010 ай бұрын
French decide to Rush B after buy AWP
@coffeecupwater10 ай бұрын
@@Crisyx91 *Let's charge like fucking retards instead of waiting for support of our own archers in case they try to surround us beyond the hill*
@syndicalistcat313810 ай бұрын
@@Crisyx91No its the opposite, they were the ones who not followed the plans, others did.
@danael008910 ай бұрын
@@syndicalistcat3138not its the opposite
@konstantinriumin265710 ай бұрын
Bayezid: slaughters Europeans like cattle, wins battle after battle so quickly he gains nickname Thunderbolt Timur: there's always a bigger fish
@HowToKillAliens10 ай бұрын
lol wtf@@Andrew-od6ve
@Darthwgamer10 ай бұрын
@@Andrew-od6ve Shortly after this Timur's empire: 💀👻💥
@Yanate199110 ай бұрын
there's always a bigger turk
@DarthFhenix5510 ай бұрын
@@Darthwgamer Shortly after? You mean a century later lmao.
@Darthwgamer10 ай бұрын
@@DarthFhenix55 Bro was breaking when Timur died.
@AltaicGigachad10 ай бұрын
Être fort comme un Turc ('to be strong like a turk'): This expression originates in the 15th century when the Turks had a reputation for being strong, almost unbeatable warriors due to their numerous victories. At the time, the Ottoman Empire ruled large parts of south-east Europe, north Africa and western Asia. It is said that François I, King of France, was gifted Turkish armour by Suleiman the Magnificent (the tenth and most famous sultan of the Ottoman Empire) during their alliance. When he wore it, he is said to have exclaimed: "Here I am now, strong as a Turk!"
@kara339610 ай бұрын
Top Kek
@Ages_of_domination3 ай бұрын
15th century huh
@Ages_of_domination3 ай бұрын
@@kara3396actually due to Serbs in janisarries it's far from a joke
@youravaragetoxicmasculinem95083 ай бұрын
@@Ages_of_dominationJannisaries only made 1/8th of the Ottoman Army.
@Ages_of_domination3 ай бұрын
@@youravaragetoxicmasculinem9508 and by the way ottoman "royalty" has less nobility than a european peasant, cheers !
@sasi584110 ай бұрын
*If i had Nickel for every time the french caused a crusade against the ottomans to fail because they wanted hog the glory by disregarding tactics/strategy, i would have atleast 2. Which isnt a lot but its weird it happened twice (battle of nicopolis and siege of candia)*
@misanthropicservitorofmars211610 ай бұрын
Don’t forget the 4th crusade. Where King Louis decided that while Richard went to the holy land, he’d head back to France and claim English territory on the northern coast. Leaving Fredrick of Barbarossa to drown and Richard to fail the crusade.
@flipflierefluiter566510 ай бұрын
They did so too at either the battle of Agincourt or Crecy(or even both maybe).
@Test-mq8ih10 ай бұрын
@@misanthropicservitorofmars2116certified French classic
@thanosofthecommunistdruzhi910710 ай бұрын
@@misanthropicservitorofmars2116 this one is the 3rd crusade. 4th crusade is the one where french and italian armies occupied constantinople in the name of the venetians and the emperor they backed, alexios iv of the infamous angelos dynasty. When alexios iv died, the sack of constantinople went underway which resulted in the destruction and deaths of much of the city, as well as many artifacts stolen and brought to various parts of europe, and the frankokratia introduced.
@fehervari9810 ай бұрын
Let's not forget that French fuckery also unnecessarily extended the Great Turkish War by about a decade.
@Turgineer10 ай бұрын
Ottomans: "I like those odds." *2:02 I laughed so much that I can't help but mention; This clip and the text match perfectly.
@renaldiroekanto78910 ай бұрын
you cant just beat mehmed in battle with 6 5 6 in power.
@hungryoldman10 ай бұрын
With faith we will always win but when we get arrogant and forgot god we lost
@GayvonFartin10 ай бұрын
They didnt like it at Lepanto :)
@RedMentalHM6610 ай бұрын
Actually Bayezid said bring more nation and man so my victory would be more glorious
@ahmetozkan4389 ай бұрын
@@GayvonFartin someone is salty about losing cyprus during that war eh?
@sbd0310 ай бұрын
Crusaders: WE WILL KICK THE MUSLIMS OUT! Bayezid the Thunderbolt: Please bring more troops to fight so that my victory will be great.
@thedonkey670410 ай бұрын
Y’all literally got saved by the Serbs in this battle lmao. Had Stefan not intervened your bayezid would’ve been called the dead instead of the thunderbolt
@BlazingFlame6910 ай бұрын
@@thedonkey6704 Coping wont change the fact the crusaders got fucked. Also blame the French for having such a big ego
@erent.510110 ай бұрын
@@thedonkey6704 Ottomans still had the numerical and positional advantage Bayezid called serbs so he can win much earlier with lesser casulties because they were able to help quickly and do a suprise attack also Bayezid's death wasn't possible as his quarters were far away from the battlefield
@yavuzkhan736910 ай бұрын
@@thedonkey670420 vs 1 and still lost and your saying serbs saved you bla bla bla get lost dude lol. You earn the name donkey i can give you that.
@KHARROUBI.10 ай бұрын
@@thedonkey6704 cope harder
@pogo805010 ай бұрын
Did they actually think they could win against a guy who is literally named Based? Come on now dawg… COME ON MAAAYNE
@debasishgoswami989610 ай бұрын
Yes, if they had a leader like Alexander,Ceasar or Bajirao then they would have neged him on ease.
@debasishgoswami989610 ай бұрын
Also Gigachad Timur laughing at Baezid in his prison.😂😂
@SultanSuleiman98010 ай бұрын
@@debasishgoswami9896Timur is turk to 😂 nothing about gayropa
@eisaahmed532310 ай бұрын
don't bring gay bajirao here. you guys couldn't even hold india and here you are talking on bigger wars in europe. I hope you also remember Ahmed Shah Abdali@@debasishgoswami9896
@ramcollramcoll660710 ай бұрын
@@debasishgoswami9896 And the commander of the Ottoman Empire is Attila.😎
@someone-ip4rf10 ай бұрын
French knights try not to charge the whole enemy army like dumbasses challenge (level impossible):
@aegonthedragon73035 ай бұрын
Preparing for the Agincourt L a century in advance
@hypersp3ce59610 ай бұрын
Beyazid the thunderbolt is such a badass nickname
@lovento98783 ай бұрын
Is it ridiculous because it lives up to its nickname better than the Europeans? lol
@Johnsmith9966310 ай бұрын
Reading the Wikipedia page about this is hilarious, since the defeat is unilaterally the fault of the French. Basically, the Hungarians, having tons of experience fighting the Ottomans, come up with the perfect plan to defeat them, which the rest of the Christian alliance accepts. Then the French come in, and the younger knights refuse to adhere to the plan since they wouldn’t have the glory of being the first ones to attack the enemy. The French decide to ‘Leeroy Jenkins’ the whole thing, charge and break the Ottoman’s weaker front lines, pursue the fleeing Turks by charging up a plateau, only to meet the Turks’ well-rested, A-team cavalry. The exhausted French then get annihilated; some of the Christians rush in to save them, but the majority of the Christian army panics, flees the battlefield, and ends up drowning in the Danube. It’s like a school project where everyone on the team pours their hearts and souls into doing a good job, only the watch the egotistical kid who did zero work take charge of the presentation at the last moment, do a horrible job, and then land everyone with an F.
@thanosofthecommunistdruzhi910710 ай бұрын
feint retreats appear to be the doom of many european armies
@Johnsmith9966310 ай бұрын
@@thanosofthecommunistdruzhi9107 Tbf it was an actual retreat for the Ottoman front lines, as in the French had broken their line and the Ottoman conscripts and infantry were fleeing for their lives. However, as the Hungarians had pointed out, the Turks deliberately fight with a relatively weaker front line in order to exhaust the enemy, at which point the strong Ottoman cavalry comes in to rescue the front lines and crush the enemy. This is why they were waiting behind the plateau, not so much to ambush the French as they were riding up to the plateau, but to ride down and envelop the enemy that was still tied down still fighting the Ottoman’s infantry. Meeting the exhausted French while they were charging up the hill wasn’t the plan, but it was still a welcome surprise. It was good for the Ottoman cavalry, it was good for the Ottoman’s overall victory…it was not good for the Ottoman’s frontline conscripts and better-trained infantry, both which got sacrificed like pawns. In a sense the Ottoman’s used a weak front to kinda act like pawns, but not in the sense they were deliberately trying to get it massacred and put on the retreat by the enemy’s heavy cavalry. In that sense, the French performed better than expected, even against the better-trained Ottoman Janissaries. But they were warned not to do something like that by the Hungarians, and sure enough it turned out the Ottomans were hiding the second half of their forces behind that hill, which then moved forward and easily destroyed them. Plus, since the French charged so far ahead of the rest of the Christian forces, no one was there to guard the flanks and protect them. The rest of the Christian forces were so spooked by the one-sided slaughter of their best knights that the Turkish cavalry was then able to easily drive the rest of them into the Danube, even though they probably could’ve held out longer had they not been so demoralized. Essentially, not only had the French fumbled the whole thing, they managed to make the Turkish cavalry look invincible as well.
@rarescevei826810 ай бұрын
@@thanosofthecommunistdruzhi9107It actually was a retreat. It wasnt a feint. The Ottomans did not expect that the French would charge on their own.
@thanosofthecommunistdruzhi910710 ай бұрын
@@rarescevei8268 mayhaps so, but in a sense it did act like a feint retreat. Even after the French knights routed the infantry (which despite some troubles with anti-cavalry stakes, was expected), they continued pursuing the enemy instead of allowing the rest of the Crusader forces to catch up. Like John Smith mentioned, the Sultan Bayezid was in fact hiding the rest of his forces (reserves) and took advantage of the French's isolation (many knights were unhorsed at this point because of the anti-cavalry) by descending upon them and taking many of these nobles prisoner. John Smith's reasoning also states that it was mainly a retreat on the part of the infantry, so I'm assuming that it acted more as a feint retreat on a much larger scale. A similar thing occurred during the Battle of Kalka, which saw the Mongols utilize what is considered a feint retreat against the supposedly much larger Russian army. When the Russians advanced, the Mongols were forced to retreat because the reinforcements they were supposed to receive were not coming. They retreated in the only direction they could (away from the advancing Russian forces), leaving behind ~1,000 troops to cover for it, who were subsequently "killed to the last man" according to my source (Wikipedia). The various Lords or Princes of Russia can be compared to the French Knights in that they continued to pursue the retreating Mongol army and their 9-day retreat. The Mongols simply took advantage of the disorganized Russian armies, causing the rest to flee. This event is widely considered to be one of the most successful feint retreats and is not too dissimilar to Nicopolis.
@gilangputra75149 ай бұрын
@proheroexperiencing55983 ай бұрын
Israel: "I won a 1v5" Ottoman empire: "thats funny"
@jvi637110 ай бұрын
Byzantines watching from heaven knowing they weren't partaking in such a massive bag fumbling
@hegantank649510 ай бұрын
byzantines were still around then lol
@Biggvs_dickvs10 ай бұрын
*Watching from Constantinople.
@nenenindonu10 ай бұрын
But they did take part, and after that endured the Battles of Varna and Second Kosovo, truely prolonged PTSD
@Yanate199110 ай бұрын
bro thinks ottomans just burst out of the byzantines like a destructive baby
@user-bi7xd8ry5p10 ай бұрын
@hegantank6495 They weren't running things anymore though...
@Chayy10 ай бұрын
Thanks to Frenchs for being our ally for these long centuries!🙏🏻❤🇹🇷 🇫🇷
@youwilldie14yearsagoedited210 ай бұрын
dont use that🙏. it is christian prayer
@tTantPisForFrance10 ай бұрын
@@youwilldie14yearsagoedited2Thats why you should use it because Christian prayer goes to god, muslim prayer goes to the devil.
@youwilldie14yearsagoedited210 ай бұрын
@@tTantPisForFrance One of our prophets Jesus (r.a.) prayed in 🤲this way. Go and read the Quran or Bible. You will see that
@tqulla10 ай бұрын
@@tTantPisForFranceLOOOOL
@Muriturca10 ай бұрын
What about jewish ones?
@valmid506910 ай бұрын
Middle Ages friendships be like: >Ottoman Empire's Muslim Sultan >Serbian Christian Prince >Tense Relationship >Flawless Victory
@ramcollramcoll660710 ай бұрын
orthodox serbian helping sunni turks againts catholics
@soul893810 ай бұрын
Lmao now serbs consider themselves as „defenders of europe“ lmao 💀💀
@rarescevei826810 ай бұрын
@@ramcollramcoll6607The catholics massacred orthodox christians against Sigusmund's orders, so makes sense
@mita878410 ай бұрын
@@soul8938 I mean we fought Turks the most but of course we'll be fierce against the Hungarians who occupied or lands after the battle of Kosovo and the others who wouldn't care to help till the Turks were at their doorstep. Funnily enough, our prince saved the sultan who almost got killed in the battle, and the Serbian prince wasn't even invited ( forced ) there but came just because he didn't want the Hungarians to win.
@AquaTomMovies10 ай бұрын
@@soul8938you should be stunned into silence by the fact that the Muslim ottoman empire was more tolerant to Christians than the Roman Catholic Hungarians were, the same Hungarians who also left Serbia to its fate in the battle of Kosovo and worse still attacked it right after, food for thought.
@brandonlyon73010 ай бұрын
Ironically years later after this battle France goes on to Ally with the Ottoman Empire.
@adivtayudhatama392610 ай бұрын
Yes. Against the Holy Roman Empire. Eventhough both France and HRE were catholic kingdoms 👀
@RajaIsThatGuy10 ай бұрын
@@adivtayudhatama3926because habsburg jaws
@crimsoncomet375610 ай бұрын
I see. No wonder why Ottoman lost to British Empire. They've got caught with the "French L" curse
@kazumakiryuu26689 ай бұрын
@@crimsoncomet3756can france ally with israel please
@volkanyldrm38248 ай бұрын
@@crimsoncomet3756well not exactly we just didnt had enaugh resorces the arab revolt really didnt help either .. still held the brıtısh though the only part we really lost was egypt and some parts of the middle so we werent really going around trying to collect glory but rather - WHERE THE FUCK İS OUR AMMO SUPPLY
@yomuyugi10 ай бұрын
French leader pulling the most ancient french tradition of prostrating yourself in order to surrender
@lahire494310 ай бұрын
French knights are literally the people with the biggest balls of the entire medieval era.
@Crisyx9110 ай бұрын
You definitely don’t know what you are talking about
@edyslavico376110 ай бұрын
They have big balls, but they are not very smart because they get themselves killed a lot of the time
@lahire494310 ай бұрын
@@edyslavico3761 The French won nearly all the medieval conflicts they fought in
@squeaky20610 ай бұрын
@@lahire4943 They had such big balls that the godendag had to cut them off.
@Tragoas10 ай бұрын
20 vs 1 just imagine sheer balls of ottoman empire
@RouGeZH10 ай бұрын
The armies had an equal size. The Turks had the enormous advantage of having a single command.
@thefaramith887610 ай бұрын
@@RouGeZH That sounds like a huge skill issue for Europeans. Not my problem. It was 20v1 and they still lost.
@RouGeZH10 ай бұрын
@@thefaramith8876 It was 1 to 1. You need to invent fake historical feats to feel better because today your muslim countries are sh!t and your people a beggars hoping to live in Europe.
@ireallycant441610 ай бұрын
@@thefaramith8876isn’t the numbers fabricated in wiki?
@Tragoas10 ай бұрын
@@RouGeZH brother it was a 1vs 20 countries and crusaders fail of command not our problem
@DarthFhenix5510 ай бұрын
0:40 Most intelligent french kinght:
@Kabutoes10 ай бұрын
This is kinda how the Afghanistan War turned out with 30+ nato nations vs Taliban
@h3w457 ай бұрын
Chadliban
@famitsus9876 ай бұрын
Taliban are cowards
@theresecoco18873 ай бұрын
Not even close. Taliban didnt fight a conventional war. They were guerilla fighters, hence why they were so hard to stamp out completely
@MultimiRac3 ай бұрын
THIS IS WHY I AM SO PROUD TO BE TURK. MAY ALLAH THE ALMIGHTY PROTECT AND PROSPER MY GREAT NATION.
@furkantugraakbas29629 ай бұрын
after "thunderbolt" beyazıd heard that 15 countries are attacking them, he said "keep them coming ,the more they are, the greater my victory is"
@king_fisherXX10 ай бұрын
I honestly feel more sorry for Hungary, since they were the only intelligent ones to come up with a plan and got Insta-ignored. Then they had to take the consequences 💀
@AltaicGigachad10 ай бұрын
Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire
@ШерханШералы-ф1д10 ай бұрын
You mean TURKIC empires not only TURKS. Yes these words are not the same meanings
@basedtvrk912510 ай бұрын
@@ШерханШералы-ф1д Turk usually means Turkic, however Turkish does not mean Turkic. Turk is used interchangeably with Turkish and Turkic.
@ШерханШералы-ф1д10 ай бұрын
@@basedtvrk9125 i want to say, turkic means entire ethnicity that encludes everyone: tatars, uyghurs, kazakhs, uzbeks, kyrgyz, turks, turkmans, bashkirs, nogays, and etc. Turk is the one of this ethnicity group
@Grungeuncle10 ай бұрын
@@ШерханШералы-ф1д Go and ask that to Turks, see if they have such division among themselves or they just know its a eurocentric semantics. Turk is a Turk, both -ic and -ish are German suffixes that dont have any place in our lang, culture, daily life.
@giorgijioshvili971310 ай бұрын
Ugh turks and there giant Ego
@fletaun10 ай бұрын
The Germans being team player coming in clutch preventing whole army from encirclement
@BavarianHobbit3 ай бұрын
Someone has to do it. A common theme. Like in the siege of Candia when the only defenders that didn't abandon the venetians were the germans. Btw siege of Candia was also ruined by french hubris.
@atakanpayman10 ай бұрын
Beyazid the First has the cognomen "Thunderbolt" which he gained from his agility to maneuver the army in the Battle of Nicopolis/Niğbolu.
@debasishgoswami989610 ай бұрын
Proceed to loose against a guy who can't even properly walk😂😂
@kunduraci3010 ай бұрын
@@debasishgoswami9896rabbit loses to tortoise
@debasishgoswami989610 ай бұрын
@@kunduraci30 Tortoise wins, flawless victory,🗿🍸
@Kaan_is_myname9710 ай бұрын
That guy "who cant even walk" is one of the greatest military commanders in the whole human history and never lost a battle. He is also a Turk called Timur/Demir ( Iron in Turkish).@@debasishgoswami9896
@Themanhimself75310 ай бұрын
@@debasishgoswami9896 Bro no wonder he lost that battle he was against a Turco mongol superpower
@gabespiro890210 ай бұрын
Serbia: I don’t care if the Turks win, I just feel like ruining Hungary’s day
@lifeneverends70682 ай бұрын
😂I love Serbs from🇹🇷
@arghayeaye459110 ай бұрын
Fun fact: Beyazid I has a nickname 'Yıldırım' (Lightning in English) given to him because of his rapid manuvers in battles.
@archivesoffantasy556010 ай бұрын
If Bayazid is lighting because of his movements, then what is Timur who outmanoeuvred Bayazid?
@arghayeaye459110 ай бұрын
@archivesoffantasy5560 Good question, I would call him a Lightning Rod or something. At that time, that would get me beheaded for sure, lol.
@HappinesBliss2 ай бұрын
'Prince of destruction'is his nickname because of his brutality'@@archivesoffantasy5560
@Northernwei.Xiangu-shatuoturks2 ай бұрын
Thunderbolt o knk
@aegonthedragon73035 ай бұрын
Most successful crusade
@Weeboslav10 ай бұрын
Stefan Lazarevic is funny character,his father,Lazar,died during the Battle of Kosovo against Ottomans. Stefan him self was loyal ally(vassal)of Ottomans and his heir,Đurađ(Georg),son of Vuk Branković was both ally(vassal) and enemy of Ottoman empire. Vuk Brankovic was married to Stefan's sister,but today he's mostly know as traitor who abandoned Lazar during the Battle of Kosovo(although,this moniker is wrong).
@soul893810 ай бұрын
Serbs truly were the ottomans most loyal and useful lapdog 😂💀
@Weeboslav10 ай бұрын
@@soul8938 Not right but not wrong either. In Serbia there's a saying that if Turkish hands are covered in blood,vassal Serb's arm up to the elbow needs to be covered in blood. Ofc there's also many Serbian uprisings and rebellions against Ottomans
@youngmanlogan58124 ай бұрын
Funny thing is Bayezid's father was also murdered in that same battle by a Serbian assassin out of the fight, but somehow Stefan and Bayezid made peace. Also, Bayezid married Stefan's sister, so they became brother-in-laws.
@Ages_of_domination3 ай бұрын
@@soul8938you just came here to comment this, batou xan. I suggest u get some balls, u and all your "people"
@Ages_of_domination3 ай бұрын
@@soul8938u kno? Maybe use some vowels.. With some consonants.. Followed by vowels... Not inverted. Vermin 😊
@RouGeZH10 ай бұрын
Fun fact: Sir Jean de Carrouges, played by Matt Damon in Ridley Scott's movie The last duel, was killed at Nicopolis, aged 66.
@Wanderer62810 ай бұрын
Between this and the hundred year war the French Knights of that wra were literally the worst lmao.
@Costin_Gaming10 ай бұрын
Until a teenage girl got them to listen to sense they mowed down the English at Patay... But that says volumes about them too. Seriously it takes a teenage virgin to lead your armies so you are competent?
@jean-raouldu291810 ай бұрын
No lmao
@someone-ip4rf10 ай бұрын
The French had the best knights but when you look at the battles they lost it all comes down to them being complete idiots
@brandonlyon73010 ай бұрын
But France technically won the Hundred Years’ War.
@lahire494310 ай бұрын
Which is why they won both parts of the Hundred Years' War by beating the English in every battle between 1360 and 1389 and between 1429 and 1453 you absolute braindead?
@mehmetgurdal10 ай бұрын
Fun fact this is the only battle that the Ottoman Army has executed the prisoners. because Bayezid the Lightningbolt was raged to the news that crusaders were slaughtering the muslim and orthodox christians on their way.
@superfrycook636010 ай бұрын
Coalition Crusaders: We will take you down, Turks! Bayezid: Good, I like the odds.
@md.rejwanullahraiyan447510 ай бұрын
Playing ottoman in eu4 while watching this now..😂
@simpletrailers116110 ай бұрын
1:11 This is the peak meme, I don't think anything will surpass this
@M.vukasinovic-x4r10 ай бұрын
Funfact: the Ottoman Empire started in the same location were Serbs have been expelled to Asia Minor by the Byzantines hundered years before. It’s called Gordoserbon in todays Turkey.
@alpddar25189 ай бұрын
Lmao, Serbs stealing Ottoman Empire now 😂😂. Couple of Sultan wives and some janniseries were not enough?!
@M.vukasinovic-x4r9 ай бұрын
@@alpddar2518 no stealing wtf get help
@mehmetyigit51577 ай бұрын
Girls:im soo alooonee Boys:
@23muhammadiqbal962 ай бұрын
Ottoman based
@pechorin584210 ай бұрын
Once again, Romanians and Hungarians are trolling each other. Wholesome.
@MrLolguy9310 ай бұрын
Fun fact : Bayezid was married to Stefan Lazarevic's sister
@theicepickthatkilledtrotsk65810 ай бұрын
She was captured in the battle and later released, through an agreement that was signed between Stefan and Timur. It seems that a ransom wasn't paid, thanks to the great respect that Timur had for Olivera's brother Stefan, and she returned to Serbia.
@volkanozturkmen624510 ай бұрын
🇹🇷🌚
@volkanozturkmen624510 ай бұрын
@@theicepickthatkilledtrotsk658Amir Timur is Uzbek Turk
@snakee2-p2k10 ай бұрын
@@volkanozturkmen6245genetically mongolian, culturally uzbek
@astrodas19102 ай бұрын
@@volkanozturkmen6245 There was no such thing as Uzbek at that time, he was Turko-mongol. Uzbek identity is formed in later phases.
@radiantarchives7 күн бұрын
"Transylvanians and the Wallachians *concluded* that the day was lost and *abandoned the field"* made me laugh so fucking hard that I forgot I was depressed gg
@TEUTONIC__ORDER6999 ай бұрын
Bayezid: wins against 20 Bayezid: loses against 1
@sultanmomenofzenata1773 ай бұрын
not one but rather 40
@HappinesBliss2 ай бұрын
Because that '1' was best top 3 commander and most importantly he was turkic
@astrodas19102 ай бұрын
@@HappinesBliss And top of that, his army was 3x of Bayezid's.
@AltaicGigachad10 ай бұрын
Writing in the ninth century, the Arab historian al-Jahiz captured the awe with which outsiders viewed these fighters: If a thousand of their [Turks’] horse join battle and let off a single shower of arrows, they can mow down a thousand [Arabs’] horse. No army can withstand this kind of assault. The Kharajites and the Bedouin have no skill worth mentioning in shooting from horseback, but the Turk can shoot at beasts, birds, hoops, men, sitting quarry, dummies and birds on the wing, and do so at full gallop to fore or to rear, to left or to right, upwards or downwards, loosing ten arrows before the Kharajite can nock one ... and if they do turn their back,they are to be feared as much as deadly poison and sudden death; for their arrows hit the mark as much when they are retreating as when they are advancing.18 RICHARD M. EATON. India in the Persianate Age, 1000-1765 by Richard Eaton .
@rramos11710 ай бұрын
If he wrote in the 9th century, then he probably isn’t referring to Seljuk or Ottomans Turks, who migrated to the region later. Probably another Turkic steppe tribe.
@Raxtelwa10 ай бұрын
@@rramos117He is referring to Turkic mercenaries.
@4CelciusDegree9 ай бұрын
@@Raxtelwaclearly they have nothing to do with us Ottoman Turks, our ancestors changed so much in a couple generations that we really cannot own up that reputation. It's more of a central Asian thing
@Raxtelwa9 ай бұрын
@@4CelciusDegree yeah thats not bc horse archery is bad or ottomans cant do itgunpowder and its weapons was new meta and ottoman turks adopted it.
@puntmannoor34039 ай бұрын
Yeah, those Turkick horse archers were really the most dreaful thing back in the day, their mobility and accuracy was just horrible, whetver you charge or retreat it is irrelevant because they will still hit you with accuracy. Worst thing is because they are nomads, you cannot really chase them down, they are constantly on the move across a vast region. They appear like ghost and disappear like ghost when the battle is over. It was arguably the most difficult and frustrating opponent all the nations surrounding the steppes had to face.
@BailensdeLykenos10 ай бұрын
Transylvanians and Wallachians as General Grevious podding made my sides go into orbit
@rajairfan27683 ай бұрын
The game was rigged the moment you have French on your team
@bigman687110 ай бұрын
The french ruining everything is the most french thing ever
@fatihaydogdu27208 ай бұрын
It is funny how European historians tried to lower the glory of the Turkish victory despite Stefan's actions has an impact of very little to none :D
@FelipeBuegos8 ай бұрын
Literalmente los serbios te salvaron sin mencionar a los franceses idiotas
@famitsus9876 ай бұрын
Most of Ottoman Empire was Europeans tf are you on about
@fatihaydogdu27206 ай бұрын
@@famitsus987 are you mentally ill? Do you really think that European christians decided to side with a couple of thousand muslim Türks to kill other European christians? What kind of ultra retard teaches you such thing? This victory and all others accomplished by the Türks and Türks alone. Others were only attenders.
@ХизирБарахоев-в1м4 ай бұрын
@@fatihaydogdu2720I do not know about this particular event, but during crimean war, Europeans were helping to Ottoman to defeat Russia.
@WolphL010 ай бұрын
Never knew Serbia was once this based.
@Weeboslav10 ай бұрын
Then you know about Serbia only from 90's. First Entente victories in WW1 were Serbian(Battle of Cer)and Serbia kept repelling AH invasions for more than a year,only falling when Bulgaria joined the war. Prior to that,during First Balkan War,Serbia went flawless victory against Ottomans,even helping their future enemy(Bulgarians)to win a crucial Siege of Adrianople. There's also First Serbian Uprising,where outnumbered Serbs managed to beat Ottoman army for nearly a decade. We could also talk about Montenegro successes in war(who only recently started seeing them self different from Serbs),which constantly outnumbered and outgunned managed to win battles(Vučji Do,Fundina,Mojkovac,Grahovac etc)not to mention that they were practically independent from Ottoman Empire for most of the Ottoman time on the Balkan peninsula
@WolphL010 ай бұрын
@@Weeboslav K thx.
@oreocarlton334310 ай бұрын
keepin that tradition of cuckoldry
@leviathan-r8f10 ай бұрын
@@Weeboslavwho asked?
@matthiasdarrington327110 ай бұрын
before Serbia was a corrupt genocide-commiting russian proxy state, it used to be a great nation.
@CanberkSezer10 ай бұрын
Bizi gururlandıran atalarımızdan Allah razı olsun.
@huseyinsadkbolat60029 ай бұрын
Amen
@TheSigmaNiga9 ай бұрын
Amin
@anonim77677 ай бұрын
Amin
@famitsus9876 ай бұрын
Your ancestors are Greek
@anonim77676 ай бұрын
@@famitsus987 least racist serbian,
@greenseagull96116 ай бұрын
Early ottomans were a different beast
@chickensoup98694 ай бұрын
Common French L
@125discipline210 ай бұрын
thunderbolt is such a striking title
@Borys_Sobczak9 ай бұрын
Turks had previously introduced me to this war with their editing skills on social media. Now I learned it completely with your video.
@akuheikeiserllen30782 ай бұрын
Serbians were pretty chill with turks during that period
@Halfarmenianhalfcircassian2 ай бұрын
Yes
@45acpisdope10 ай бұрын
based Germans (totally not biased) for defending the army while it was being cringe
@AltaicGigachad10 ай бұрын
The Turks were considered as the best warriors due to their horsemanship and skill in archery. Kaushik Roy., n.d. Military Transition in Early Modern Asia, 1400-1750: Cavalry, Guns, Government and Ships (Bloomsbury Studies in Military History). p.24. While there is much more than this to the Turks, it is true that Turks rank among history’s great empire-builders and rulers. Under the Ottomans they conquered vast territories in the Balkans and the Middle East and ruled for six hundred years. Turkey Country Study Guide Volume 1 Strategic Information and Developments pp.30 The Turks can be killed, but they can never be conquered. Napoleon in his own words from the French of Jules Bertaut p.44
@SetuwoKecik10 ай бұрын
"when they're on their ranks, 10,000 of these turks are more calm and organized than 100 crusaders."
@TTminh-wh8me10 ай бұрын
You should do battle of Tốt Động - Chúc Động between 6000 vietnameses and 50 000 to 100 000 chineses lol.
@bblunder10 ай бұрын
Bayezid I's title was "Thunderbolt" because of the quick maneuvers and decisions he took against the enemies surrounding the empire from both the east and west.
@BladeMoonFlare10 ай бұрын
You does not seem to understand, I'm not locked in here with you. You're locked in Nicopolis with me Ottoman Empire, circa 1400s, probably.
@AltaicGigachad10 ай бұрын
THE TURKS AND THE WEST from 11 days. Europe stood in awe of the Ottomans who crushed many states and conquered vast territories, going, as all patriotic Turks will proudly point out, "all the way to the gates of Vienna." European literature is replete with the depictions of the Turk as the hated enemy. The English often thought of the Turk as awe-inspiring and destructive. Thomas Fuller wrote in The Holy Warre (1639): "The Turkish Empire is the greatest... the sun ever saw. ...Grass springeth not where the grand signior's horse setteth his foot."
@Denizklcl10 ай бұрын
Bayezid I also known as Yıldırım(Thunderbolt) Bayezid. His nickname was given to him after this war because he arrived to the battlefield way faster than expected and crushed his enemies before him.
@whiskys381410 ай бұрын
I'm reading the wiki article, the history it's fascinating. That's why M.roflness bring us this histories. Chek this out; Nevers summoned a hasty council of advisors, in which Coucy and Jean de Vienne, admiral of France and the eldest French knight on the crusade, advised obeying the wishes of the Hungarian king, which seemed wise to them. At this, D'Eu declared that Sigismund simply wished to hoard the battle honors for himself and declared his willingness to lead the charge. Coucy, who declared D'Eu's words to be a "presumption", asked for the counsel of Vienne, who noted," When truth and reason cannot be heard, then must rule presumption."
@omerfaruk828210 ай бұрын
True Ottoman moment right there.
@XMehrooz9 ай бұрын
May Allah bless the Ottoman Empire and let us all Muslim countries return together and merge into One single Caliphate once again!
@korkukokusu83119 ай бұрын
No i hate darkness of the Muslim world they even see art and portraits as haram
@XMehrooz9 ай бұрын
@@korkukokusu8311 No, only sculptures are haram. Since they since the time of Adam(PBUH), have always led to idolatry in the future. Pictures are halal, if they are not for idolatry.
@korkukokusu83119 ай бұрын
@@XMehrooz it changes sect to sect just like some muslims see only pork haram to eat some see anything other than fish living in sea is haram
@famitsus9876 ай бұрын
Lol
@theresecoco18873 ай бұрын
No thanks. No more islamofascists and their warmongering
@muhammadahmadidrees39169 ай бұрын
I really like the Shock Serbian Cavalry. Always haul a lot of respect as well as strategic value.
@bilalahnadzai12346 ай бұрын
My Turkish Brothers 🤝
@space0001010 ай бұрын
You could also do Goguryeo-Sui War and Battle of Salsu
@fakihfakirullah946210 ай бұрын
He already made that video you can search it
@izzatsufian279610 ай бұрын
Based Ottoman and European war
@0xhoky10 ай бұрын
French after realizing they took the wrong move : "There's nothing we can do"
@russB0B9 ай бұрын
AW HELLLLLL NAWHHH DAWG, THAT WAS CRAZY HOMIE. Keep it up.
@edaozcan91552 ай бұрын
NE MUTLU TÜRKÜM DİYENE!
@CommandoBG283810 ай бұрын
Average French selling the battle:
@bogdan344410 ай бұрын
Sigismund of Luxembourg and Mircea the Elder were the only capable leaders in that context. Personally, I think Mircea and the Transylvanians should've stayed and helped Sigismund, who thought he could still save the French and possibly win the battle. But wtf do I know?! The man did save his army to fight another day.
@crytill10 ай бұрын
Crusades feel like a party gone mighty wrong
@emeraldeyedstruggler3362Ай бұрын
This battle was fought on my birthday 😂😂
@АјдеЗвездодајгол8 ай бұрын
People dont how how great was Stefan Lazarevic millitary strategist,against mongols at Ankara he was there too,he gained independence from Turks after the battle and took the title Despot in Constantinople. Last time Serbia was independent was with him in Medieval ages.
@turinmormegil771510 ай бұрын
Ah _Wunderbar_ , the Full Set of Traditional French Tactics: Throwing a reckless heavy cavalry charge + speedrunning to surrender _Mein zwei_ favorite! _Beschämende Darstellung_
@schiffschiff427210 ай бұрын
Ottoman history be like -Maltese knights capture a harem ship belonging to Sultan Chadeiman the Based -His 758 wives insist something must be done -Chadeiman sends his 69th son Midmed ibn-Cucket with 100,000 warships to seize the island -Ottomans outnumber the Maltese defenders by 500 to 1 -The Knights of the Order of St. John are capably lead by Jean Pimp de Gigachadette who inflict devastating losses on the Ottoman invaders -Ottoman fortunes reverse when the legendary corsair captain Dragut Khebab arrives and rallies the attackers -Dragut dies to a random cannon shot -After demolishing most of the Knight's fortresses and seizing most of the island, the Ottomans are decisively defeated by a far inferior Italian force that arrives 5 minutes before the siege is ended -Sultan Chadeiman resolves to consolidate his navy and take control of the Mediterranean -Corsair fleets raid with impunity throughout the sea and win many victories -Bastardo of Austria leads a united Christian fleet against the Ottomans at Lepanto -Ships with heavy cannons are better than ones without them -Crushing Christian victory, legendary Ottoman commander Chadi Pasha is killed -Chadeiman decides to invade Europe instead -Ottomans take over half of Europe easily -Get all the way to central Austria facing no serious difficulty. Vienna will fall shortly -Ottoman army is completely annihilated by King Chadoslav the Based of Poland in the largest cavalry charge in history 5 minutes before Vienna was going to surrender -Chadeiman takes personal command of further invasion in Europe -Chadzinski of Hungary holds off hundreds of thousands of Janissaries with 2000 men for months at the Siege of Szigetvár -Chadzinski fights to the last man, and blows up his fortress killing half the Ottoman army 5 minutes before they would've consolidated their victory -Chadeiman dies -Repeat
@kunduraci3010 ай бұрын
Peak manga
@edyslavico376110 ай бұрын
People tend to forget italian navies were the main naval force holding back the ottomans in the Mediterreanean
@Wulfrygg10 ай бұрын
This post deserves far more likes.
@iskanderaga-ali335310 ай бұрын
Um, acthyally, the role of the winged hussars in the battle of Vienna are severely overestimated, the ottoman line was already crumbling when the hussars charged ☝️
@Ropewatch10 ай бұрын
Holy shit. This is wild.
@kuzeycan62779 ай бұрын
Common W Ottoman Empire fr
@kerimaras322910 ай бұрын
Please do the II. Varna Battle too, the background leading to battle is much funnier to me
@kianakaslana121010 ай бұрын
This period feels like the Turks had power of Allah and anime by their sides. After the disastrous Ankara to be captured by Timur, Turks was disintegrated into various Beyliks and the Eastern Roman and Europe had every chances possible to reconquer Anatolia or at least pushing the Turks out of Balkan. But fucking no, the Roman continued their traditional civil wars while Murad II dealing every crusades coming to their ways and uniting Beyliks. And then Mehmed II became mature enough and the rest was history.
@sgr715510 ай бұрын
So this how the young gen is going to learn history - from meme videos