(2012) G.K. Beale Conference Session 2: The Old Testament as the Key to Understanding Revelation

[@michaelfalsia6062]

What a wonder godly scholar.

[@spongedong7980]

good stuff

[@ezekielshibemba4233]

Very helpful!!

[@darz3829]

Do you have any provable, fact-based evidence of anything spiritual in the bible? (this doesn't include secular historical or archeological people. places or events)

[@Lilly2Gbtg]

I’m not sure what you’re asking. Can you restate what you mean by spiritual?

[@darz3829]

@@Lilly2Gbtg Non- physical. That which is the apparent attraction of the bible.

[@SaintHeretik]

Read Victorinus's western commentary of Revelation (Latin commentator)

[@darz3829]

@@SaintHeretik "Read Victorinus's western commentary of Revelation (Latin commentator)" And you in turn read my explanation of the written word ---- "ANYTHING supernatural or spiritual that is taken from the bible is hearsay, feelings, beliefs, hopes, and tales of imaginations, and not proven with evidence. The bible is a book mostly written by men who never even met the people they wrote about (many years after). It is also heavily edited and censored by a church that had a power and politics agenda, eliminating around 14 books (the Apocrypha). In addition, there isn't just one Christian bible - there are at least three with different numbers of chapters. There exists no provable, fact-based evidence to support any of the supernatural (spiritual) events in it. Thus, it is pure human belief - a human emotion and dependent on as many human thoughts as there are humans. To believe without factual evidence is like saying a court case should be determined by only hearsay or a feeling. It's hard to think God wouldn't hold humans to a standard that they hold themselves." You see? Both are written by humans and offer no proof or evidence of anything.