2013 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Much appreciated. The most common post here is "why doesn't this guy have more views?". I would be grateful to anyone who can figure that out. The trajectory is upward but very slowly.

[@JayTsay]

Merely your opinion. We test drove the CX-7. We almost bought it. The next day, the CX-5 arrived and fell in love with it. Much better looking inside and out. We got the Cx-5 instead. Mazda definitely did not miss the spot. It just needs a bigger engine. We also have a 2011 Mazda 6 V6. Cant wait to see the new mazda 6.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Sorry, I meant the CX-5 is larger than the Focus, not just the wagon.

[@plutonium9]

I like a lot about the CX5 and think it looks great but am missing the Skyactive message. In awd drive trim, the EPA rates the CX5 at 31 mpg highway. I was under the impression this "Skyactive" technology was something special. The 2012 CRV (about 100 lb more) returns only one mpg less on the highway yet comes with a significant 30 hp/ 13 ft lb more.

[@thebunnis]

I have the CX-5 with manual transmission and it is an absolute joy to drive. I'm averaging 32 mpg over the course of 10,000 miles, mixed city and highway driving.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

I included all the negatives I found. What is it that concerns you?

[@77rxpharmacy]

The man in front of the camera looks/sounds awfully familiar. Didn't he used to do car reviews for one of the networks in Seattle Washington? His reviews are one of the best out there.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

My brother has the wagon. I'm curious what your point is. I can go to my Ford store and get a Focus hatchback with better mileage than the wagon even though it's larger and more powerful. CX-5 is larger than that wagon and has more room. Some people need it. If AWD saves me once a month it's worth it. It has all the covers cars have but it was subjected to very intense punishment on very rainy and muddy courses. You can see it on my site later today.

[@2010Kraftwerk]

It is definitely smaller than other displays, but it is much more functional than others as well. For example, it is quite a quick system, there is hardly any lag in between touches.

[@MIZUNOMP60]

Still have our 2013 CX-5 GT 85,000 trouble free miles. 155HP not much power available in this original model. Very reliable and handles nicely but slow as a snail in a uphill race ;-)

[@DecaSpace]

You do well with these reviews. I appreciate them.

[@ForgotToMentionThat]

Very much so!

[@76carmel]

This is a city CUV, but if you want more power, look elsewhere. However, there is a SkyActiv D diesel in '14 coming, but we'll see...

[@TimJoseph08031990]

It has almost the same gauge layout as the first gen Honda CR-V, which my family has, but is brushed metal and has digitalized fuel, mileage, and temp gauges. It has the same displacement as the first gen CR-V, but it's paired with the 6-speed transmission. It has almost the same overall interior room as the CR-V. Since my mom does heavy city driving to and from work, this one is more economical.

[@JohnScottv7]

I test drove one today (2.2 liter diesel) and the acceleration was awesome, but the road noise was horrible. Also, there was no power seat option, and the only one-touch automatic window was the driver's. Thinking I prefer the VW Tiguan.

[@poooooow]

Why is the bottom not closed? In my bmw the bottom is complete closed for aerodynamics and no dirt coming from the downside...

[@TheAustineo]

Tom! You always mention to test drive 3 cars. At the end of your videos, you should mention your top 3 favorite cars in group, based on the car that your reviewing for that video. For example in Chevy Cruze video review you could've said " in this category of cars I would test drive the Cruze, Elantra, & Focus. Thats just my recommendation for this category." Just a suggestion. I love the videos Tom! :) Don't Stop!

[@eddies225]

Great Job Tom, best car review video on youtube channel!

[@BryanMumble]

one of the best car reviewer here on youtube

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Much appreciated! Please tell your family, your friends, your dog, your parakeet...

[@DevPack]

hmmm im shopping for a crossover currently...This looks very good, but however i think ill the 2013 escape will be better for my purposes. I will still probably go test drive a Mazda cx-5 tho you never know.

[@TheMacFacts]

I subscribe to many auto channels and after a while they make me bored to death where i can hardly watch there videos with your channel i find myself watching your videos over and over and say hi to the evil twin for me and keep these great reviews coming!!

[@mlps93]

thank you for the upload brilliant colour ext and int. beats the CRV, Escape, Equinox, and Rogue

[@RichardJoashTan]

is there a difference between the cx5 and the badge engineered outgoing Tribute?

[@Donbeiren]

Drive the Mazda 6, the steering was horrible. The Mazda 3, fun little car but sooooo noisy.. Hopefully I'll get to try this one.

[@ryanohare611]

you do a good job tom with your reviews! i enjoy watching them!

[@TheEuroperules]

DID you check the sales numbers ?

[@Y10Q]

they probably made that wiper blade control in the way of the auto key start on purpose. Japanese do that sort of thing for safety.

[@jvrdlc]

How about road noise.. Is it notable? Better than the Crv?

[@Japplesnap]

For the price, the CX-5 has a lot of bells & whistles. It's also a good-looking small SUV with decent power (especially the 2.5L engine in the 2014 models) and great fuel economy.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

The answer is- yes. Buy the one you personally prefer.

[@ActionHero29]

Isn't there a 184 hp engine available on the GT for this model? Thats what i saw on the Mazda website, oh wait that was for the 2014, may not be applicable for the 2013

[@helloreviews]

But, wich is the best transmission?

[@yelp1000]

They upgraded the engine on the upper trims this year to a 2.5 liter.

[@SuperMattMuah]

Tom, I have an old Saturn LW200 wagon that has lasted forever but is getting old and annoying to repair as fewer and fewer dealers can service it. I am looking at the CX-5 as a replacement, but I'm concerned about the power. I drive over a pretty demanding mountain every day to work. I was wondering if you had experienced any slowness when driving on an incline. Everything else looks awesome about this car! Thanks for the awesome review!!!

[@MrForeal10601]

Can't wait to test drive the 2.2 diesel. Should be here soon in the US. =)

[@rrt08]

Best review I have seen of this vehicle.

[@xray5899]

Great review! Isnt this Mazda a little small compared to the rest of the class like the escape though?

[@clarenceexd]

How exactly is the navigation? Is it worth it to get it?

[@feelsgoodman245]

Looks like a very nice car, especially the feature-packed interior. Thorough review as always, thanks!

[@craigholifield9679]

What top three including the CX-5

[@DrivenCarReviews]

The industry is moving very fast. If I said, "Cruze, Elantra, and Focus are my top 3 picks", six months from now that might not be true. Take Dodge Dart. It's good enough to replace one of those on that list. I have a hard time saying "this is the best". That is very egotistical. There isn't a best car, only one that's right for an individual. The biggest mistake people make is buying a vehicle without really looking at the competition. I say drive 3, to understand what's out there.

[@neil3858]

Thanks for your reviews. Very concise, and reliable.

[@dagrome]

So far my only quarrel with the car is the 160 HP engine. I'm the type of person that would be willing to sacrifice some MPG if it means my car can drive a little faster. I'm not talking about blistering 0-60 times, but I drive in a mountainous region, so I need horsepower for hills. Can't wait to see how the diesel engine performs.

[@KevinAlej21]

wow this car is beautiful! i wish i would have bought it, i go the 2013 Nissan Altima. i love my Altima tho but this car is beautiful very elegant, Mazda has come a long way!

[@venom5809]

Tom rocks. This is a pretty nice vehicle.

[@helloreviews]

And the cuestion: Transmission AT vs Transmission MT

[@jershinator13]

Awesome car, hopefully they will add a v6 option or at least a more powerful version for towing. till then, ill stick with my 2012 acadia (i know, different class).

[@DonKangolJones]

Sexy, in a weird crossover way. I may consider this car in the future. Love the reviews, keep it up!

[@ryanmichaelmurphy]

another great review!

[@94navin]

well awd takes more gas and the grand touring is a auto. trans and as you know auto .trans drink a bit more gas had it been a manual transmission it probably would have gotten more hence why the Mazda cx-5 is the most fuel efficient SUV in it class even hybrids with 35 mpg and also remember Mazda would sacrifice some mpg for it zoom zoom which is not a gimmick!

[@nismofury]

This car looks better in pictures than it does in real life. In real life this car is mini van ish. Soccer mom ish. It's a bit pricey at dealerships also. The doors are a lot taller feeling. Like a minivan when you climb out. It handles okay but I don't see it being sporty like all these reviewers are saying. It's a crossover there's no steering breakthrough. Good car bit overpriced but it's a bit girly in real life.

[@tehw00tnessftw]

I've test drove this car a few days ago and was impressive but the sale person I talked to is too aggressive and he keeps avoiding answering my question about the cons of this car. Can you please tell me some of the cons of this car?

[@yelp1000]

To my eyes the design of this is more appealing than a number of the 40k utes.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

New KODO design language. Nagare is gone.

[@2Kriss2Kross]

Mazda definitely has a winner here! They're a heavily underrated brand. This and the new Escape are worthy enough of being the new benchmark of the crossover class. Sorry CR-V!

[@2Kriss2Kross]

The CX-5 isn't related to the new Escape like the Tribute.

[@ijl05]

I agree that the 155 hp isn't acceptable, but many basic 4-cylinder in most compact SUV are slow in my opinion unless you get a turbo or V6. Honda CR-V offer 30 more horsepower, although Honda still use 5-speed auto :/. Toyota RAV-4 continue to offer 4-cylinder, however, dumb Toyota drop the V6 smh. The Ford Escape seem to have plenty of options when it come to engine choose, although they are having some reliability issues. For my money, I would rather get neither the Mazda CX-5 or Honda CR-V.

[@alijalab]

These guys are good too!

[@landon390]

Looks great !

[@30mmBalistic]

I bought one of these and it's amazing...

[@elinconcluso]

How did it hold up?

[@azatecas]

nice review

[@garlexHD134]

Why isn't Mazda selling as many cars as Toyota? THEY'RE AWESOME CARS!

[@dinero747]

I drove it. its very quiet when driving.

[@NS416]

road noise is a issue with this car still to this day

[@rjc-ii]

If you live in the states, I wouldn't hold my breath on that one.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

I am that guy. The internet is more profitable.

[@DerangedSloth555]

I like the car.. I mean the blue one at 1:45

[@mateo096]

How could you give Evil Twin a day off?? :P

[@mdevilguy112]

him and cooley on cnet

[@BryanMumble]

try to put more tags hehe

[@m4sta2k]

to bad this car costs like 70 k usd in norway for the sport version

[@contractki11er]

Lucky you, we still don't have the diesel in the US :'(

[@madpistol]

THANK YOU!!! I'm so glad I'm not the only person that feels this way. Honestly, I hate the looks of the new CX-5. It's just not proportioned right. The interior is rather bland looking, and that screen... god it's ugly. After test driving it, I have to wonder why reviewers all say it's sporty too. It was very comfortable, but sporty was not a word I would have used. Long story short, I bought a used CX-7. It looks better inside and out, and drives better. Mazda missed the mark with the CX-5.

[@DrivenCarReviews]

Completely different vehicle.

[@JOKBO1]

Evil twin is getting an haircut.

[@RichardJoashTan]

okay, thanks! ^^

[@HunterXray]

MT Trans = No All-wheeldrive, at least where I live.

[@dschonsie]

only as diesel

[@alijalab]

The Fast Lane Car

[@unggalboomz]

Very nice car :D

[@ActionHero29]

yeah thats what i said in my comment, 2014

[@tallen35875]

my mom saw this on the screen and asked if it was a Buick. >.< kill me now.

[@madpistol]

Mazda usually does very good interiors, but I think they made too much of a departure this time. It feels like they tried to make an evolution of the Tribute, not the CX-7. That's a problem because the Tribute was very ugly. I understand the need for fuel economy, but when Ford puts a 180+ hp engine in their NEW Escape that gets 33 mpg highway, it means that Mazda missed the mark, both on power and fuel economy. You also get more kit on the Escape. Mazda has lost their core focus on the CX-5.

[@daleval2182]

Ford uses cvt Mazda does not. Cvt oftenvends in expensive repair, weigh that in

[@madpistol]

@@daleval2182 Ford used a 6 speed automatic in this generation of the Escape.

[@daleval2182]

@@madpistol did you buy one,? § Im shopping an awd SUV, like both Ford and Mazda, something 2015 to 2017

[@madpistol]

@@daleval2182 I did not. I drove a Mazda 3 during that time.

[@daleval2182]

@@madpistol how was the mazda?

[@MrCami1234]

1.4 multi air (:

[@neckojezioro123]

graand touring for around $28K is not a bargain at all

[@2Kriss2Kross]

Sales numbers mean nothing.

[@DulferCarter]

3: 56. Somebody tell this creature ,your cargo should not cover your visibility ,blind spot.

[@sex14]

This guy looks like Dolph Lundgren

[@gerardgoucher5821]

it looks remotely like a new 3 series...

[@Emotionengne]

where's the evil twin?

[@Rome1017Lights]

first -_- doesnt feel so great.. why do people yell first?

[@TheMichaelRN]

they toned down the concept design so much.

[@BryanMumble]

looks like a BMW interior

[@Danemicos]

Be honest... you do SUV reviews when you need to buy a metric ton of toilet paper :)

[@lexusfan100]

what happen to your twin?? lol

[@johnherrera305]

Stop being cheap. LOL.

[@carlospereira3504]

all that crap in the engine just from driving over mud? hahahahaha, this car is going to be a lemon.

[@carlospereira3504]

i feel sorry for you. you don't know what a car is.

[@virtualmagicguy]

Hey Tom, great reviews man. I know you have been saying at least test drive 3 vehicles. I have done a lot of internet research and I have can't seem to nail my choices down. I'm looking for a great compact car with good fuel economy. Right now I'm leaning towards a Jetta, Elentra, Sonata (even though mid-size but has good MPG), and Forte. Also I need a vehicle that's pretty reliable and require low-maintenance. Do you think the Jetta is fit for me? Thanks in advance.