2018 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.0 Bi-Turbo Review | EvoMalaysia.com

[@ycs1466]

I heard a lot of thai people complaining about this engine..

[@KonWaiLuen]

It is a very highly charged engine compared to the current 2.5 and 3.0 engines in the market. I wont be surprised if there are issues.

[@rickrochel8170]

Yup, highly stress engine

[@gaming.galaxy6121]

They could just develop there 3.2L adding another turbo...It could be have an impressive output.

[@kkhalifah1019]

What issues were the Thais having with the new 10-speed gearbox? Come on say it... don't be shy...

[@graememeadows1325]

From looking at the ford line up for 2019 so far. It seems that Ford is just broadening the collective metrics and mix matching more car parts together to redefine their baseline. 2 ltr engine saves fuel, 10 speed eases both curves, torque overall and less strain on a small engine hence Bi turbo lag compensation meets help the 10 speed. Yet a dyno run with a twin turbo and find gaping holes in not only fuel mapping but other overall performance curves. My suspicion is that the WILDTRAK and RAPTOR will get another engine variant before half yr. In the meantime, MY 18/19 models will be fitted with bandaid patches. ECO... It suggests everything.... People are like sheep in any country BUY on hype?.... I could be wrong? Ooooh and this is without me getting into the exchange rate between Baht and Ringgit. 65 K AU do the conversion.

[@taxes6921]

well...i still love my 3.2 wildtrak😘

[@KonWaiLuen]

It's a lovely engine, the 3.2

[@Ervinyj]

it appears that the new ranger front bumper colour is slightly different than the car body. 2:32

[@KonWaiLuen]

Oh yes, you are right. Didnt spot that. But paint matching between plastic and metal body parts is a tricky art at best.

[@nabillarif]

sounds like a very stressed engine if u take capacity vs torque ratio..im doubting the reliability....

[@KonWaiLuen]

That's a question at the back of my mind too. Fairly certain this won't be a popular choice in East Malaysia.

[@oreeEE-hc1ip]

hahaha...me too

[@bodhidarma666]

That's what the conservative people think. Rangers has been selling fairly well here in East Malaysia and the presence of the new Bi Turbo ones is already felt.

[@addrientuan6339]

come on la. It is Bi Turbo. Just like Mercedes ma . More tork on it zzz

[@limpek001]

Owners of the 2.0 will brag about their lower road tax but the 10k extra they paid is enough to pay more than 10 years of tax

[@KonWaiLuen]

Hahahaha.. yes, got a point. But then again, that extra RM10k on the price tag can be spread into your loan. Your road tax cant.

[@hansonmmm]

That’s what I’m thinking.

[@Fortunata1617]

2.0 with 200hp and 500nm its a lot of pressure. Someone with an elevated blood presure do not live long anymore if he is no going to lower it.

[@KonWaiLuen]

I do wonder about the engine's long-term durability.

[@edwardkon939]

Kon, this Ranger Raptor version bi-turbo 2-liter engine is more hype than substance. It is packed with brawns rather than brains.

[@KonWaiLuen]

Hmm... why do u say that?

[@ericeric2580]

Why , why , why can explain ?

[@edwardkon939]

@@KonWaiLuen Because the tenspeed transmsiion has yet to prove its mettle.

[@badasshulk5532]

not much different except for the absorbers, tyres, biturbo and baja mode than the current ones. 3.2 wildtrack much better and value for money. ranger raptor not value for money. dashboard looks so very ordinary considering amount you pay. citing performance konon! do you know SDAC gives no warranty claim if you perform like way roadshow raptor perform like slight jump and sudden turning.. so what is the point of citing performance as a selling point

[@barazfpv1133]

Please bring in Ford Transit 2019!

[@bobbymudda]

Overall, if you were buying a new Wildtrak. Would you go for the 2L bi turbo or the 3.2L? I am trying to decide.

[@thehammer3340]

Stay with 3.2, it is better with the more aggressive power feel when driving :)

[@KonWaiLuen]

The 2.0 is tuned quite aggressively too. Objectively, I don't feel a difference from the 3.2, but somehow, the 3.2 is just smoother and nicer.

[@mohdazizjaafar3606]

Aiya. No money la

[@macang4428]

come here to see an opinion from u uncle about new hilux. im using ranger 2.2 xlt manual. using it 5 years already. want to change to a new auto truck. hilux, ranger.. fuh.. pening

[@ryr5y]

What is the lowers speed for the adaptive cruise control? will the system stop the car completely when travel 100 km/h and suddenly facing a traffic jam ?

[@huzhixin6418]

I still can't caught what you said at all, i just want to make sure which one is better and save between wildtrack 3.2L and wildtrack 2.0L bi turbo? Because i need to buy next month. Thanks!

[@KonWaiLuen]

Well... the 3.2 is no longer on sale, but that's what I'd pick if it was my money.

[@allanchin5309]

I can’t lock my Wildtrak by depressing d little knob on d door handle. It’s just not sensitive at all. Is this normal on d Wildtrak?

[@KonWaiLuen]

Shouldnt be the case. It's probably spoiled

[@bobbyvaganza5501]

please ford back to Indonesia. this ranger and everest is my favorite cars.

[@MrJhon1962]

Paddle Shifters would be nice

[@jasont2455]

hey. from where I am, we dont get the 2.0 bi turbo new Wildtrak. Our Wildtrak looks exactly like the new one, but it still has the 3.2 6 speed.

[@KonWaiLuen]

Nice..where are you from?

[@ngyc6294]

Its pretty obvious that Ford is 'urbanizing' their Ranger lineup even though it comes with the expense of power delivery, steering feel etc. But as a side note, given that the motoring trend is shifting towards force induction small capacity engines, it would be very interesting to compare recommended long term maintenance or service intervals eg. >150K km against their NA equivalents. I mean although technology has improved till there's no need for turbo timers and intercoolers, it is a fact that modern cars and their components are designed to last "a certain" time span only yet still undergo higher stress.

[@KonWaiLuen]

I suppose improved understanding of material sciences may help a little, but I do share your sentiments on questioning the long term durability of these highly-charged engines pushing out more 150-200hp per litre. All these come at the expense of increased stress to the engine internals.

[@bobbyling1846]

Calling VW Amarok V6 even more refined and smoother.

[@fyeahitsrul5683]

I stil like the older model. Esp colour.

[@Nordlys1966]

Good critical review. Keep them coming!

[@MrArmaiz]

i like the light steering. I dont like my navara steering. that hydrolic power steering quit heavy and annoy me when parking

[@KonWaiLuen]

Fair point there. Light steering is useful in tight spaces, but still feels funny to me la.

[@johnmactavish5191]

I have been waiting for this review since the facelifted Ranger was launched last month. What you said about the 3.2 engine, I couldn't agree more. It just has that refinement that no other 4 cylinder engine can recreate. You also mentioned it during your review of the Ranger 3.2 XLT. I know this feeling because I have driven the 3.2 Wildtrak as well as Honda's large capacity engines. Nothing beats the smoothness of a large capacity engine. Great review Kon.

[@KonWaiLuen]

After driving many cars over the years, I've learned that although you can turbocharge a small engine to give it wonderful performance, additional capacity gets the job done with great refinement and mechanical richness. It's a pleasant feeling that is subtle, but once you recognize it, you really appreciate it.

[@edmund09]

Please do a comparison with the new Triton when it comes

[@memerangchannel6364]

problem car

[@themainmanontheblock]

Hey Kon. nice vid as usual. A couple questions. Does this truck still feels like a truck. What I meant by this is I fell in love with pickups because it was harsh, rough, blue collar bad ass ute. Does this still make you like a "Bad Ass" or just another good car? And another thing is, is it necessary for a 10 speed gear? I feel it will add up to the maintenance cost. Heard bad things with fords current transmission. And is it sustainable at a hefty cost?

[@KonWaiLuen]

It is very refined for a truck, but of course not as smooth riding as a monocoque frame SUV. Today, if it's blue collar ruggedness you're after, the Hilux and D-Max are your closest bets. The rest are shifting toward a more urban audience, as evidenced by Ford launching a new Wildtrak 4x2.

[@KonWaiLuen]

On the 10 A/T, i personally think 5 or 6 speeds are good enough.

[@joeyal445]

Can you shift from 2H to 4H or 4L while its running or cruising along?

[@KonWaiLuen]

Between 2H and 4H, no problem. To and from 4L, have to come to a full stop and put transmission in N.

[@zairazakaria5070]

Mr Kon. I'm still waiting your review on the Peugot 5008

[@KonWaiLuen]

I also waiting for them to gimme car 😂

[@ExpertMacintosh]

No replacement for displacement

[@KonWaiLuen]

Can la, in terms performance, but not in terms of refinement.

[@bobbyling1846]

Aiya Kon did you not realise our ringgit dropped by 20% to the Thai Baht?

[@KonWaiLuen]

I do, but how does that relate?

[@bobbyling1846]

@@KonWaiLuen So naturally price goes up by 20% loh

[@KonWaiLuen]

Fair enough.

[@muhamadnasron]

1st!

[@unintentionallyfire]

Yawn, go and drive an Amarok.

[@KonWaiLuen]

Been there, done that. autoworld.com.my/news/2012/11/19/Volkswagen-Amarok-tested-in-Hannover-Germany/

[@unintentionallyfire]

@@KonWaiLuen Yeah, that's not the V6TDI with 550/580Nm torque and 200kW on overboost...

[@sparkplugmymind5747]

Load capacity?

[@KonWaiLuen]

Max Payload - 1,000kg Max Towing Capacity - 3,550kg

[@davidthompson882]

I’ve got a 3.2 diesel wildtrak and as I’ve never driven this model as not available in the U.K. as yet we’ll not that I’ve seen, but.i tow quite heavy loads from time to time and I honestly can’t see how in comparison that engine could cope long term, it looks more of a lifestyle choice for regular driving, my 3.2 is a lazy engine but it pulls great with a load behind me, I’m no engineering genius but to quote our American cousins there’s no replacement for displacement, likely sound like a dinosaur now, when it’s here I’ll give it a go might change my mind

[@KonWaiLuen]

For long term durability, my bet will always be on the bigger engine. You can coax smaller engines to match the outputs of bigger ones, but something has to give. Considering that the components all are subject to higher stress levels, compromised durability is a sound bet.

[@davidthompson882]

Kon Wai Luen probably a good unit mate for lighter loads and to be fair I do want to try it with that 10 speed automatic box as my 2017 model is 6 speed manual, facelift looks good but love the new raptor look too, uk will see it soon hopefully

[@reyfuertes61085]

Task straight bro, you confuse me.

[@dondonjj3352]

Hello Kon, what is your opinion/experience on offroading using an electric power steering?

[@KonWaiLuen]

Have not had the chance to try it.

[@anandsamy5194]

Like Myvi, Hilux is king of Road for pickup truck. Always cucuk behind in highways.

[@ST-wi9eq]

The Ranger is overrated. I had a 3.2 XLT back in 2014 and the engine was strong but loud and unrefined with bad fuel consumption. I'm now driving a new Hilux 2.8 and it's fantastic! Very smooth, powerful and good on fuel (15km/L on highway). Plus, Sime Darby Ford is a joke.

[@KonWaiLuen]

Actually, even the Ranger 2.2 wasn't great on fuel consumption, but the 3.2 to me was a pretty smooth engine. Agree on your assessment on the new Hilux 2.8. Good to know you have a more pleasant ownership experience now.

[@Aamal-ct3py]

well said my fren... ford msia is a joke, everytime i send for my missus ranger 2.2 for 10k km service, the cost is higher than her X6 40d... perghhhh!! ps/the ranger was sold after 3year.

[@KonWaiLuen]

And they say Bimmers are expensive to maintain. Lol

[@bodhidarma666]

Yeah smooth Hilux. So smooth that it slides like a pudding during the Moose test. Hilux, yes, had a good recod or reliability. But no reliable vehicle can keep you safe if there it has lesser handling capabilities.