2018 Honda Accord: Which engine to pick?

2018 Honda Accord Review: After spending a week in the brand new Honda Accord back in the fall, we put the larger 2-litre engine through its paces to see which power plant comes out on top.
Subscribe to the Channel! We review cars with a growing family in mind.
-----------------------------------------
Subscribe! kzbin.info?...
-----------------------------------------
#FamilyWheels #hondaaccord #subscribe
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Our latest review is here!
"2019 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Review From Family Wheels"
• 2019 Mitsubishi Eclips...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~

[@velvetbear7184]

1.5 for reliability and gas mileage…2.0 for reliability, gas mileage, and a whole lot of fun to drive!!! 2.0 for sure!!!!

[@radeejarrar6521]

1.5 turbo is not reliable at all compared to the 2.0

[@Beltalowda666]

For anyone considering this car, I have just purchased the 1.5 L manual...and it is FUN! If I take the Eco mode off, she's quick off the line or going down an entrance ramp. Very responsive in the corners. As for fuel efficiency, when on the highway with eco mode on, I'm avg about 45 mpg!! I love this car 😍

[@pressmore1]

Just got my 18 1.5 touring today red🍒 with tan inside...love it.

[@BreakingBogeyGolf]

@@pressmore1 How is it still holding up if u have it???

[@Tokyo_1031]

@@BreakingBogeyGolfat 100k miles I’m having to replace the turbo 😢

[@therealstaxxyoung]

​@pressmore1 yep . The red hits different!!

[@therealstaxxyoung]

​@Tokyo_1031 take care of it 🤔

[@juanpablohinestrosa7929]

I loved our comment about the wagon! Honda, if you are listening, please make that dream come true!

[@WNYfellow]

Good review of the 2 Hondas - as it happens, I drove both just a few hours ago! Nice channel, too - great to see a practical, family-oriented focus.

[@EchoSigma6]

You stated what I was thinking during your review and that was how awesome the Accord would be in a manual transmission and sport/station wagon version.

[@yongutsa]

My search for the next car is done thanks to your video, FW! Very informative and comprehensive video, two thumbs up!!

[@FamilyWheels]

Awesome, Elon! Glad to help!

[@e.l.9589]

Well spoken, good energy. Subscribed!

[@davewitter6565]

Great review, loved it.

[@sandorspalms]

AWD would be a great option for a Canadian market. Great review and sorry you guys have all that snow up in Alberta. Thankfully down here in Toronto we are snow free... For now.

[@CMane]

Yes!!! The ‘regular unleaded fuel’ note is really big as it relates to this car. I’m experiencing it first hand. Winning. Also, the ‘provided you’re not auditioning for the next role in the Fast and the Furious,’ line is so true. I’ve found that a little gas goes a long way with this car. Think light... This car is not for the lead footed...but it can move when you need it to. (Which doesn’t require murdering the gas pedal) 🤔 Drive like a speed demon & you’ll be cussin’ every time you pull up to a gas station. LMBO! 🤣

[@gp6p353]

I own a 2019 sport 2.0t 6mt and I concur that the manual is a total blast to drive. Mine is san marino red. I routinely beat cars off the line that are left dazed and confused. I get a kick out of it every time. 1st gear has some wheel hop but 2nd and 3rd pull like a rocket.

[@fawkes1570health]

That's awesome! Really considering getting one too. Not too fond of the taillights (that stapler look) but the red body color makes it blend in well. So it's either red, black or white. Hmm...

[@mattc9412]

I got the last Accord, a 2016 sport. Loved the car except it needed more power. I felt it was waaay too slow. I got the 2.0 sport now and its fabulous.

[@kbarrett1844]

Enjoy your reviews. Good level of content while being concise.

[@rafsal143]

Finally a great Canadian car review channel, I always had to convert the US mpg to Canadian Lpk and it was annoying!! Thank you 😊

[@FamilyWheels]

Glad to have you along for the ride!

[@zbfng812]

Great review on a great car. I did extensive research on these two cars and the others in this class. I also read every car magazine and watched every KZbin video I could find that compared all the 2018 family sedans. Following all of that I came to an educated and informed conclusion - I bought a 2018 Accord Hybrid Touring (in Modern Steel), and LOVE it. The engine is smooth, it is plenty powerful when needed (I unintentionally smoked the tires pulling out into traffic), the eCVT is smooth and always ready, and this car is quiet. However, I will say that the 47/47/47 mpg rating is not accurate. I recently got 55.7 mpg city mpg. And I average in the HIGH 40s and low 50s when combined. It has so much technology. Everyday I'm learning new things it can do. This is a FANTASTIC car. Great looks (MANY compliments on the color and the car's looks from friends and strangers), superb quality and a quiet and luxurious ride. And it's a FUN car to drive. I may have to add fuel stabilizer to the gas tank since I go so long before filling up.

[@T0mmyGun654]

Like this comparison video for engine options. Would like to see more similar videos in the future.Good work.

[@tropcm]

I think Honda made perfect balance in every aspect specialy 10 speed automatic. Love your videos by the way. Keep uploading. :)

[@FamilyWheels]

Right on! Thanks for watching.

[@RustyPranger]

Great review! Noone's mentioned the low ride height for Accord... I bet that's where the awesome mpg comes from. The statement from Toyota re: Turbos was enlightening! (I'm camp NA for now). You won my heart (and my sub) when you said 2.0T manual Wagon. omg I hope Honda was listening.

[@FamilyWheels]

Hi hear you! How huge would a manual Accord wagon be?! Thanks for the sub.

[@PrimeAutotainment]

I was happy to see you bring on the 2.0T, Paul! I agree with you on pretty much everything between the 1.5 vs 2.0 and compared to the Camry. Putting powertrain aside, I’m still digging the 2018 Accord over the 2018 Camry for more comfortable seats, Apple CarPlay, and more space everywhere.

[@jaffarbaqi]

Prime Autotainment And better looks?!!

[@CMane]

I never got a chance to test drive the Camry.... I went to Honda 1st... & drove off the lot with a new one. 😆 I’ve been a Toyota fan for many years and have owned one so...I was really curious. I’m not mad at the new design and look of the new Camry after watching them over the years. & to see it being compared to the Accord sparked my interest in both cars. I gotta say... I’m loving my Honda.

[@PrimeAutotainment]

At first, I didn't like it! Now, I really like it. It's even better in person

[@PrimeAutotainment]

Haha that's awesome! I don't blame you, I just drove the Accord 2.0 yesterday and I kind of fell in love...I drive a 2017 4 cylinder Camry so big difference lol. Glad you love it!

[@nygiantschamps9340]

KeezOfLife welcome to the Honda club! Have a 2013 accord exl w/ Navi Love it ...these new ones though have me very curious lol

[@27Zangle]

Just stumbled on this channel and really liked the presentation. Hi from Alaska!

[@FamilyWheels]

Glad to have a viewer up in AK. I'll be there next week!

[@27Zangle]

Awesome! Lemme know if you want some pointers on what to see and where to go.

[@brandonf9984]

I couldn’t locate a 2.0t with a manual but I can’t complain the 1.5t with a 6spd is still pretty good

[@AW27s93]

Dude you need to advertise your website more, put it in the description of your videos! I had no idea you had online report cards for each review you do until now! Great videos, they definitely help when looking for a new car!

[@FamilyWheels]

Point taken. Just mentioned it in the Expedition review. Thanks!

[@youngblood23rb]

Great review I really appreciate the Canadian/US fuel economy conversions

[@FamilyWheels]

That's our little gift to our viewers in the south!

[@Emale2000]

Why do Canadians make mileage numbers so complex? (Liters per 100Km) Why not simply use Km per liter?

[@kman1000]

Sorry ;)

[@supra2k8]

most cars give you an option to do L/100km or km/L

[@ahapainenpaavo6010]

Emale2000 because kilometers are the distance. it would be stupid to say kilometers to liter. liters to kilometers is the only realisticly good and working one.

[@4myfridm]

I drive 10 speed semi all day. I don't want to shift my car too. The CVT is nice & smooth. My 2018 Accord 1.5L gets 40+ MPG hwy. Anyone who has bought a particular brand of car they feel has done them right will stand by that brand. For me it's Honda =)

[@savemankind738]

Awesome review paul , Its very informative as always covering all the bases which would of course help out people in deciding which engine would be better suited to their needs. I myself would stick to my 2.4 naturally aspirated engine for now since I don’t know how reliable turbo engines are gonna be in long run

[@davidp2707]

It's not the 80s anymore. Turbo isnt going to affect reliability

[@vichetmeng2366]

Is sooo the best way

[@modmatt1]

Great discussion and update! I went through a similar decision making process (said prooocess candian style) here south of the border (N.E. US.) comparing whether to go turbo vs. N/A in a mid-size sedan. I went with a 2017.5 Mazda6 Touring with the proven 2.5L N/A and manual back right when the new 2018 Camry and Accords were coming out. I avoided 1st year model bugs and while I liked the Toyota N/A engine offerings but they too were all new and only available coupled with an automatic. I'm with you on the Accord with the 2.0T and 6 speed manual, which wasn't available when I bought in November plus they are ~$6k more here than the Mazda6 Touring offering. I would have loved the extra hp and new platform of the Accord 2.0t Sport, but I'm good with my decision to date. Good decision making everyone.

[@benderaviation]

The Camry has an 8-speed DSG (dual clutch) so while it is an auto, its still a step up. It does however have some smoothness issues.

[@amosjsoma]

I just took delievery on a 2018 with the 1.5L engine. Unless you're looking for a hot rod, this engine has plenty of get up and go.

[@FamilyWheels]

Yep, we found them to both be more than zippy. If you're a real car enthusiast who wants lots of highway passing prowess, the 2 L has the edge.

[@savedby_grace6110]

@@FamilyWheels Of course..

[@gregblack8550]

I’m a old man . I bought the 1.5 sport with Manuel trans. I can’t believe the power out of a engine smaller than my last Harley motorcycle. Handling and apple car play are cherries on top. Road noise is high but it is one heck of a car.

[@savedby_grace6110]

@@gregblack8550 Correct: impressive indeed.

[@savedby_grace6110]

@@gregblack8550 Congratulations! By God's grace, I'm a proud owner of 1.5 LX. Less money. AT, and great gas mileage.

[@humbertogonzalez7505]

I think I’ll have the 2.0 as well. Looking forward to the Expedition review!

[@FamilyWheels]

It's up now!

[@7viewerlogic670]

They got rid of the manual E-brake, no fun!! One thing to look forward to in winter is a few E-brake slides. Electronic one has delay to its application.

[@K03sport]

2nd the sport w/manual and 1.5t...wagon would be icing on the cake...my 14yo vw turbo (120k mi) is doing just fine; oil changes w/the right oil and mx and the car is doing just fine and still getting 30 mpg in the summer...It's survived CO and OH winters and is daily driven...I don't see why a honda turbo can't do the same thing

[@kaceydillin7367]

accord 1.5t manual transmission owner here. Love my Accord. I live in Texas and do 95% city driving. 30.5 mpg. 2.0t just isn’t a worthwhile upgrade. P.S., Ironic for Toyota to mention cost of ownership. Camry is $600 a year more expensive than Accord on insurance...Yes I double checked and compared them when I was car shopping.

[@MarcoGiudice]

That's interesting why is more money to drive a Camry? Less safety features?

[@wheatlyteal]

if you get accord 1.5t auto its a cvt, while 2.0t gets a 10spd auto

[@louyht7]

@@wheatlyteal Should i get 1.5t or 2.0t bro?

[@wheatlyteal]

@@louyht7 The only 2 reason I would consider 1.5t over 2.0t is for better mpg and lower price point. If those 2 points isn't an issue to you. Get the 2.0t and enjoy. I'm thinking to get stage 2 tune for more power on my 2.0t.

[@louyht7]

@@wheatlyteal When did you bought your car? and do you have any issues with it like oil dilution?

[@maverickwatchreviews]

Getting the EX in a week or so. Great review :)

[@Trades46]

If you can afford it, I'd splurge for the 2.0T. The 1.5T is a fine engine, but the fact it is matched to a CVT makes me question the long term reliability. I much prefer the 10spd auto used on the 2.0T, and knowing that the engine block is derived from the Civic Type R, the 252hp rating means it is quite detuned and therefore have lots of overhead - the engine is relatively understressed while the 1.5T is making 192hp vs. the Civic at 178hp & the Sport hatch at 182hp, meaning it is at a higher pressure which may cause issues in the long run.

[@rkalla]

Trades46 spot on to this comment.

[@lordsknight4516]

1.5T it's a better deal. You're paying over 30k for a .5 liter more engine

[@bobdolespen]

@@lordsknight4516 That's....not how that works, read Trades46's comment and really take in the information he's trying to help you understand

[@lordsknight4516]

@@bobdolespen I understand what he is saying, but not everyone can afford a $35k vehicle. Especially since most people are buying two cars now in days, One for yourself and one for the wife and kids. You need watch how you spend your money now days. Would I like the bigger engine, of course I would, but you need to be realistic on how you spend your money. You're going to need a bigger down payment, pay more money on your monthly payments, and you're going to be spending more money on gas because you got the bigger engine. If you don't drive around a lot then that's great but if you do drive around a lot you're going to feel that in your pocket.

[@bobdolespen]

@@lordsknight4516 right but your original post didnt make all those good points you said you're paying over 30k for just a .5l engine which was over simplistic, also all the 2.0 trims have more features trim vs trim level so there is still a good but of value I think in getting the 2.0 trims especially if you can find or haggle a good deal, the declining sales is making actual bargaining a reality these days.

[@Maureentv1]

Manual transmission has been discontinued for 2021. I love my 2021 still night blue 2.0t Accord mated with a 10 speed. The torque curve is sustained from 1500-4500 rpms resulting in one of the fastest lap times for any mid-sized sedans.

[@ericmueller4771]

Totally agree about the wagon comment at the end. I have a 91 wagon and would love to see honda bring the wagon back to the North American market.

[@rampar77]

You hit it right on the head. Honda had gone away to focus on economy and MPG instead of reliability, ease of maintenance and simplicity. I owned Accords and CRV,. I tested drove the new Accord and CRV with turbo and CVT, there was noticeable lack on the turbo and the hesitation on the CVT. So my next car will be a 4 or 6 Camry. with conventional trans.

[@romansantos2241]

Hi Paul, love your channel. Keep up the great work! Just wondering if you’ll get the Nissan Leaf soon to test and review. I’m interested to know you thoughts on the Leaf vs. the Hyundai Ioniq EV. A compare would be amazing! Thanks!

[@Blackacreonfire]

My 2014 Accord V6 coupe with a 6 speed auto routinely gets about 10 Lt/100 km in the city, and about 6.5-6.2 on the highway, although I have seen as good as 5.5 on a 900 km trip. I live in eastern BC, so this is all mountain roads, too. So while the 2.0 turbo actually sounds like a pretty good engine, and the idea of dropping a hundred or so kilos off the front end would be wonderful, I think I'll keep my big V6. (oh, and I would have loved the manual - too bad Honda sets its manuals up in such a way as to create a 10-15 percent penalty in fuel economy). At least they gave me paddle shifters.

[@deusxjrpg]

Such an excellent car inside and out. Though the Stinger has my eye due to it's hatchback-like trunk. Add that to this Accord and change the taillights and it'd be perfect.

[@mrdave777]

Question?? When you take a small engine and turbo it’s displacement. How does that impact longevity?

[@michaeldavis5486]

Very impressive! With the lone exception of no all-wheel-drive available (which I can actually respect Honda for not offering), this all new 2.0 litre Honda is a serious wowzer of an automobile! If AWD isn't important to a potential buyer of a brand new mid-sized car, this is THE one to get! Can't wait to have a seat in one at the upcoming auto & truck show. Take a bow, Honda!

[@pdp_nag]

I purchased a 2.0T last month. Man , the performance is exhilarating.. You have to be very very watchful to not to make speed violation. Just like that the vehicle exceeds 85mph if u are not watchful. Aside this , steering response, handling corners , quick lane change manoeuvre are piece of cake in this car. Awesome .!!!👍

[@n1n0z24]

pradeep nagendran what mpg are you getting ??

[@pdp_nag]

@@n1n0z24 In sport mode and heavy foot i get 22mpg. In Eco mode , with light foot , where gear upshifts at 2.5k rpm, mpg is 29 to 33 on intercity driving. 2.0t is very sensitive to rpm i observed. If more mpg is target one must not exceed 3.5k rpm rpm at any gear. I have done 2k miles so far. Expecting improvement further.

[@n1n0z24]

Is it fun to drive ???? Im in the market for a daily driving sedan and i dont know what to choose a car like urs or a camry with the v6

[@louyht7]

@@n1n0z24 So what car did you buy accord or camry?

[@wyhop6071]

In the last 25 years, I’ve purchased 4 Accord V6s UNTIL they brain stormed this latest Turbo 2.0. Last year I passed on Accord Touring 2.0 Turbo to purchase a Camry XLE V6. I really wanted the 10 speed tranny on the Honda but the Camry V6 does everything better using only an 8 speed tranny. I’ve had 4 Camry V6s as well! They’re both great cars! I’m an older guy and I seldom drive over 60 - 65 mph. A real conservative driver. So on the V6s I can get OVER 40 MPG on the highway! No exaggeration!

[@FamilyWheels]

Over 40 MPG??! Sensational!

[@daneldridge]

I have a 2020 Sport 2.0 so far average total mpg is 31.2 When I drive 57 miles to work, I get a trip average between 34.8 and 36.6 might. I do have fun with the pedal on occasion.

[@stateniland]

thinking of the Hybrid Touring Accord.. any suggestions?

[@xxFallenKnight]

I brought the 2018 accord Sport 2.0l turbo. Really fun to drive.

[@woodswalker1111]

Amen to that. Got one too. Love it.

[@rayc6062]

Great review! Has anyone tested the car with 4 adults? As a family hauler and road trip vehicle, I'm thinking the 2 litre engine would be the better choice.

[@Beltalowda666]

I know it's a bit late, but I've just recently had a nice go around town with 4 grown adults, and she worked great, mine is the 1.5 L manual.

[@sandorspalms]

Hope you get to do a review of the new Kia Stinger lower trim 2.0T version which would offer AWD. I'm curious how it would compare to the Accord. Also the Hyundai Sonata would be a good comparison.

[@HNunyabusiness]

Sandor Alex Fazekas I think Honda makes engines with way more longevity. My 1.5 turbo rocks, even with the CVT trans

[@thejustlogic]

Hello any ideas about the oil dillution problem with this new accord ??!!

[@yippie6862]

"Cole's Notes" :) Never heard that one before. Here in the USA we have "Cliff Notes".

[@FamilyWheels]

Funny the little things that are different between us!

[@tonybui135]

I love my 2019 Honda accod

[@corneliuscoble6297]

Gorgeous vehicle 🤗💖👍

[@projecttomorrow227]

<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="270">4:30</a> i chose the 2019 Accord LX 1.5T 192hp 30/40 mpg w 10yr warranty . i prefer a small powerful high mpg motor . it's the future. my LX has unbeatable specs not to mention xlnt sound stereo . at level 11 get full bass (volume goes to 30) clear and can hear all instruments.

[@pilot2020]

I wish they made a awd accord,my first car was a accord along with 3 others,87 accord 91 accord ,99 accord ,2000 accord ,then went to a 08 crv because I had a kid ,I love accords just wish they with awd ,like there flagship acura tl sh model

[@representj12]

I'm still deciding if I should get the accord sport 2.0 or jump into a Acura tlx v6 ... what is your suggestion or advice on this?

[@helsonly722]

the SH-AWD is another beast. depends what your driving style is. go throw a TLX SH-AWD around a corner and you will see what i mean. it beats quattro, 4 motion, x drive etc

[@MichaelCena08]

honda always keeps its tech high :)

[@bingchu6007]

They should make an awd version of the 2.0T Accord, make more power out of the motor and call it the Type R.

[@FamilyWheels]

Oooh, a Type R Accord. Interesting idea...

[@thatdolphinsrealtor]

Thanks for the review! Off topic question. What type of watch are you wearing? Love the face

[@FamilyWheels]

Zack Byers it's a Citizen Eco Drive, Zack!

[@thatdolphinsrealtor]

Oh wow, I thought it looked like an IWC. . Very nice watch. Cheers!

[@philip1065]

Went with the 2.0 sport so I have a 6 speed manual on it :D

[@justindavis5983]

Honda did a good job. Fun to drive, attractive, good interior layout, comfortable, practical, and reasonably priced

[@velissalewis5321]

Justin David How bumpy is the ride? I don't want to feel or hear the road that much.

[@justindavis5983]

VeLissa Lewis I thought it soaked up the bumps really well. there isn't a lot of road feel, it feels kind of numb, and it rides very smoothly. more so than the Camry, I thought

[@velissalewis5321]

Justin David Thank you so much!

[@GoofieNewfie]

Yup, they just need to redesign the front, the back hatchback looking nonsense, the rear tail lights, the etch a sketch ipad thing stuck on the dash, put in a actually good sounding stereo, ditch the push button shifter, move the sensor in front somewhere where it doesn't break every time a pebble hits it or mud or snow gets on it, oh, and get away from the civic platform it's based on, bring back the coupe, and all that work for a 2.0t to get rid of a sweet v6 to gain how many mpg? lol. Worse accord ever. And its over priced. No wonder they aren't selling. I've owned several Accords, not interested in this thing AT ALL

[@velissalewis5321]

Steve Well alright Steve. Lol. I do not like how it looks. I still have my 2008 Accord Coup and it has 243,000 miles on it.

[@paulbrown6338]

1.5T was ok on power but had other issues Honda tried to keep quite. I traded for a 2.0T and like it much better.

[@johnhull6363]

Oil dilution

[@youngblood23rb]

The new Accord is near perfect all it needs is a smaller wheel option with a tire with more sidewall

[@catsspat]

I've heard of people swapping them at the dealership with another buyer who wanted the larger rims (misguided or not). If I were to buy an Accord (Sport 6MT), I'd try to convince another buyer at the same time to swap wheels with me. Then I'd buy another set of rims anyway, with summer tires. :P

[@youngblood23rb]

catsspat You definitely have the right idea

[@jabom99]

There is no reason to put low profile tires on this car. What a stupid decision by honda. The ride is terrible and if you hit a really bad pothole you are screwed and may have to change a rim.

[@randym195]

I agree. Too bad Honda forces their 19' rims with the 2.0 Engine. I don't want to pay the extra money and buy new rims. I guess its the Honda EXL trim with the 1.5 or the Camry XLE.

[@boldcitycc]

yep hate these stupid ass big wheels that are the rage. I have 19s on my camry xse. looks nice, rides like shit when you hit holes or bumps. thanks engineers for following childish fads

[@RainzWolf]

With an aggressive front look like that, this Accord would look marvelous as a hatchback/wagon. Maybe Honda would feel more inclined to make that an AWD!

[@scottmurphy4946]

I love the blue color on the Accord sport... but no way in hell I would want those 19 inch wheels where I live

[@erwinchua1435]

great job..

[@Hero007ization]

Homda Turbos are the most reliable you can think of. I have a Acura with Turbo engine and it is just fine after 200000 miles on it.

[@07sadie25]

This is untrue. Honda is already struggling with issues in their turbocharged engines. It will be interesting to see how they work these out. Long-term there could be a lot more issues. I would wait before purchasing.

[@Hero007ization]

@@07sadie25 Not sure what do you mean here by untrue. Honda makes the best cars and the most reliable engines humanely possible.

[@NL-in6uj]

their oil dilution is a massive problem. @@Hero007ization

[@Hero007ization]

@@NL-in6uj I never faced that problem and I always had Hondas

[@olakunleolafisoye8433]

Most people judge based on what they hear which is bad. Honda makes good engines , I have used 2 hondas and never had issues with any at very high mileages!

[@shujayethossain6554]

Which is a better 6MT Accord between 2018 1.5 and 2.0 ?

[@Bonjurro]

So if you got one of the models with 19” wheels and swapped with someone for the 17s would that mess up the odo/Speedo or would the overall diameter on them be the same?

[@amills0516]

Depends on the rubber not the rim size

[@gustavhoffmann2373]

OMG, I am living in Alberta too!!!

[@haidaralghareeb9967]

Ok guys forgive my ignorance, i am keeping an eye on the 1.5 L version. However, i read alot of complaining about the size of the engine. I am a heavy driver and i drive daily to work (80 miles daily) not ti mention travelling from time to time. So choosing this turbo 1.5 L, is this a good option for me? I know nothing about this Turbo and how good it is. So kindly help me decide. Thanks guys.

[@SociallyBrandedMedia]

This was a great review!

[@JDMHero47]

Considering the oil consumption issues that plagued the vcm-equipped j35's - I think those naysayers are completely insane. I was personally going to buy the current rdx for the v6 w/ a vcmuzzler 2.0; but when I saw the new one released on January auth the 2.0t & 10-spd, I threw that plan straight into the garbage. VCM is not worth the headache and arguments with the dealer, my friends.

[@lionintu]

That new RDX though..... Beauty. I hope they made a good choice with the engine

[@NicolasPerez15]

Good job Honda. Getting the 2.0 Manual in the fall when prices come down a bit. Save the manual!

[@Cobb]

I'm in between on the CVT, I owned a civic with one that was absolutely atrocious. It was always at redline when you accelerated, didn't get much pep when trying to speed up to merge or pass (which gave me a few unsafe occurrences) and didn't improve economy over their previous automatic (for me at least). However, I have an accord with the CVT and I have no problems with that transmission. Its smooth and shift like a regular auto, where if the fact sheet didn't say it was a CVT I'd have never known. Additionally, I can get up to 40 mpg combined with a bit of conscious driving, way more than I could ever manage in a civic. I think they started bad, yet have been developed better as time goes on to be a good option.

[@FamilyWheels]

Yep, not all CVTs are created equal. But this one is really good!

[@lionintu]

Cobb what year civic and accord are u referring to? Im ready to give up the 2014 civic, which lags annoyingly passing on the highway. The 1.5 accord was quite nice in my test drive. Like u said, the cvt is hard to notice on 1.5. Huge step up and smooth acceleration . And The 2.0 was amazing.

[@Cobb]

Vic da G the civic and accord are both 2015's I'm interesting in trying the new engines.

[@billfromEtown]

I hate the disappearing shifter with buttons

[@MarcoGiudice]

I do too and unfortunately it kept me from buying the 2.0. which I wish I did now. But still love the my 1.5

[@AR-dq8rm]

Darn right! I have the 6 speed manual 2.0T and it's a torque beast considering it's a "family sedan". I can't wait to modify it and retune it.

[@FamilyWheels]

Nice choice! Would loved to have driven the stick model as well, for a comparison. Is it a long or short throw stick?

[@AR-dq8rm]

Family Wheels it's long throw, sticking to more of the "family" sedan theme but, still fun and easily changeable. Although they do have manual available they are still becoming rarer and rarer. Thanks.

[@evilemperor6426]

is it possible to convert fwd into AWD in this Accord??

[@AR-dq8rm]

Evil emperor I'm not too 100% sure but I highly doubt it.

[@truthbetold89]

I say test both the 1.5 and 2.0 before making a decision. There are many factors to consider not just horsepower.

[@louyht7]

1.5 is 3-4k cheaper but it have CVT and i heard it's very expensive to fix and it might have dilution issue. I rather go for 2.0 just to be on the safe side.

[@lili5597272]

well, in this climate, Honda 1.5L turbor will have engine oil problem. CRV is already been pulled out from china market. Careful for picking up 1.5L from Honda

[@jamesgand828]

I heard from most reviewers that the manual transmission on the 2.0T is not as good as the 10 speed. For the sake of fuel efficiency, I would be on board with the Automatic.

[@sn4rl277]

With the 11th Gen released and the 2.0t no longer in the lineup. If you need MPG savings get the 2.0L Hybrid, if not get the 2.0t over the 1.5t. There have been serious reliability issues with the 1.5t found in the Accord, Civic, and CR-V's. I just voted with my wallet and picked up a 2020 Honda Accord 2.0t Touring. I really like the ride and look of the Touring. It's a great family sedan. I could not put my money into a 1.5t civic or accord after all the head gasket issues seen thus far.

[@Mr5083]

Hmmm does the drag coffc effect the steering ratio

[@theanimeotaku2794]

I think the 2.0 engine would last longer since you would rely less on the turbo and more on the engine honestly you should get better mpg with the 2.0 in the cold

[@shaesham]

Dude great video. Great car. And yes manual 2.0 would be the only option for me. I still don't like the extra lane keep assist stuff though but if it comes on the base then there's no way to get rid of it is there?

[@KnightofDight]

You can turn off all the Honda Sensing stuff, I believe.

[@FamilyWheels]

Yes, you can.

[@theom7915]

Yes I can turn off the Lane assist on my 2018 Honda Accord Touring. However I really love it.

[@neilquinn]

1.5t is known for oil dilution problems I believe. For that reason alone it's worth going 2.0. Also, this is a large sedan, not a honda civic. Go 2.0t people.

[@cliksmart]

Dealers are asking too much for it as of FEB 26, 2018. A lot more of 2018 Camrys are on the road. LEs and SEs so many...

[@MVPlayer123]

Badger41 because toyota does fleet sales

[@N3wbMa5t3r]

If you want a get up and go, get a sports car... I think $4,000 for a 2.0T upgrade is ridiculous.

[@mountainhobo]

1.5l - 31 MPG, 2l - 26 MPG. That's a pretty big difference to me.

[@careyhinds5086]

Actually the fuel economy he got was very good I have a four cylinder 2009 Mazda 6 with 175 hp, that 2.0 turbo is getting way better fuel economy than my car, on average I am getting 9.7 litres per100km. And the fuel economy will only get better in the summertime, I will definitely get the 2.0 litre engine now thanks to this review

[@mountainhobo]

"Actually the fuel economy he got was very good" -- Good or not, my point was 26 --> 31 is a big jump, and it won't get any smaller in the summertime. With a manual transmission either one would provide fun driving.

[@Xetenor]

Yea it is. I have the 1.5 with the CVT and the gas MPG on it I am getting is just insane. Averaging about 37 MPG driving mix of freeway and streets. I am not using the eco mode either (it just sucks anyway) Once my lease is over I definitely want to test drive the 10 speed 2.0T. I really want that higher torque/hp engine and go away from CVT as I am a bit worried about CVT having bad reputation though I am sure it will last a long time if you don't beat the crap out of the car.

[@mrh3085]

S P I’m averaging 28mpg in mixed driving with my new 2018 Honda Accord Sport 2.0 with the 10spd trans while driving in the normal mode. This is about the same as I got in my 09 Camry V6 SE.

[@Noble_Isaac]

Mine: 1.5L with 35mpg

[@Tigerex966]

Waiting for the coupe

[@matthoward1174]

In the USA, the 2.0 is a $4500- option. I'll go with the 1.5 6 speed manual, as I don't trust CVTs for the long haul.

[@jason2live190]

Matt Howard Honda’s CVT isn’t as bad as you think. My brother owns a 2016 Honda Civic LX and it has nearly 70k miles on it with no major problems. He takes care of it a lot, so I’m not really surprised.

[@rico1075]

Yea i purchase the 1.5 because that 2.0 has to many working parts and I believe in the long run that 2.0 will have some problems in that engine

[@wheatlyteal]

@@jason2live190 If you enjoy driving and actual feedback of your car's engine, cvt takes away all that.

[@louyht7]

@@rico1075 Really? but i heard if something wrong with CVT it's going to be very expensive to fix

[@louyht7]

@@rico1075 How much did you bought it sir?

[@johndrake2729]

The previous Accord is bland and boring??? I beg to differ, my friend! A lot of people love how it looks, especially yours truly. It's the Camry that looks bland, boring and, may I add, odd.

[@FamilyWheels]

Well, we're both in agreement there, John. But it's not a mutually exclusive, one or the other type thing... of course, this is just my opinion. It is my job to have them but you don't have to necessarily agree with them!

[@MidnightAspec]

The 9.5G Touring/Sport is such an attractive car.

[@zakm4012]

Please don’t bring the Camry into this yes it looked bland for 2016 but now the Camry kicks the accords ass with more sales and still offering the v6.

[@a32tl]

@@zakm4012 The fact that the Camry sells more units than the Accord just goes to prove that the masses aren't always right. The Accord is hands down a better product than the Camry. If people are choosing the Camry because they prefer its styling I offer no argument but if they're choosing the Camry because they think it's superior, then they are just flat out wrong.

[@zakm4012]

Andy Jacobs Lmao I find that hard to believe. I may have over exaggerated a bit, but both are great cars. You really can’t go wrong with either any of them.

[@irunfreightllc]

if im more of a city guy and looking for better gas and fuel economy should i get the 1.5 instead of the 2.0?

[@rolieg81]

1.5T manual, just watch Matt maran's review

[@gipsyavenger9829]

Go drive the 2.0T with the 6 speed or auto and you will soon realize you are not missing a V6. A conservative flash tune on this engine will get you 300hp and 370+trq. This is probably one of the best deals on the market right now($30k+).

[@percussion44]

Do you know why conventional aircraft general aviation engines are all NA 2 CI per HP designs from the 1950's ? Because in aircraft unreliable garbage gets people killed. You can't just pull over if your engine blows when flying. You're advocating 2.46 Hp per cid? Do you have any idea how much heat that tiny block is trying to dissipate? Do you honestly think a company would put the kind of R&D into materials science and thermodynamics to make such an engine for a consumer commodity built to the lowest price possible for such a thing to be remotely reliable?

[@jwchoi721]

This accord would have been perfect with a hatchback since it already has that fastback design. Gives you the functionality of the crossover with the driving dynamics of a sedan. But still a great car

[@FamilyWheels]

Man, couldn't agree more!

[@salmanbhaidani7494]

At first I was gonna get the 2.0 sport accord since I like the new interior and how it has Apple car play.I previously owned a 2017 accord but sadly it got totaled.When I first saw the new redesign I was not a big fan of it but after a while the sport designed grew on me mostly because of the rims and spoiler.I driven both Honda and Toyota but at the end of the day I bought the Camry Xse for 27k.I love the design and I prefer the traditional gauges instead of electronic one in the accord.Lack of CarPlay upsets me but I heard rumors that Toyota should be releasing an update for the 2018 models since the 2019 Camry will be getting CarPlay.The 4 cylinder model is perfect for me and it’s gives me the extra power that I need.One of the biggest reason of why I didn’t buy the accord is mostly bc of turbo.I prefer naturally aspirated engine over turbos.Turbos don’t last long and after 100k miles they will start giving u problems.Also the new Toyota looks better in my opinion and gives more a sportier look with the black rims with the silver accents.Also I wish Honda would give us a better gear selector since I hate the buttons cause I can accidentally drop some water and mess it up.I am happy with my purchase just wish Apple car play was in the car.

[@alexmay1217]

I watched a review in which they raced the gen 9 V6, and the 10th gen 2.0T and the tenth gen beat the V6

[@stephancunningham3072]

I have the 1.5 but I’d love to have the 2.0

[@georgedoughly6344]

It Sucks that Honda stopped putting a V6 engine in the new Accords. I would definitely get the 2.0T engine Accord if I had to choose between these 2 options. I don’t like those Crappy CVT Transmissions.

[@mkzenthusiasts]

Take a look under the hood of that 2 liter it still has ALL THAT SPACE almost like they plan to bring back the v6 once that 2T falls apart. I was going to buy a new accord coupe but it's gone and the 2 liter 4 door was it's second strike the 3rd strike was stepping up to an Acura SH-AWD V6 but that transmission was TERRIBLE it had far to many gears. That 10 speed is a 7 speed with 3 overdrives 1,2,3,OD,4,5,6,OD,7,OD. My MKZ AWD 3.7L V6 gets the same MPG as the accord and my Lincoln in Sport holy crap!! Thank God for stability control taking the power away so I didn't roll it

[@ronnymb67]

The Camry will have a 4 cylinder turbo within the next couple of years on certain. Recall just a few years ago when the Lexus commercials were touting how the es and GS still came with a V6 and BMW and Mercedes and Audi all had 4 cylinder turbos are there bass Motors? Well what did Lexus do a couple of years later? 2.0 T as the base engine.

[@raging_carnut]

Dealers are trying to sell the 1.5T with the manual since it will be killed by next year. You can buy the 1.5T now with the new 0w-16 oil. So this engine shouldn't delude oil anymore