2019 Acura RDX A-Spec - Best Performance Value?

[@theresemcmahon135]

I never feel like you’re trying to sell the car you’re reviewing; you’re remarkably unbiased... and informative, thorough, and unpretentious. I also love how you consistently compare the features/content/value/driving dynamics/etc. with the vehicle’s competitive set. I always look at many reviews for cars I am interested in it, but always judge them based on what you have to say. Keep doing what you’re doing, bro!

[@simonrichards5430]

Wasn't bored by your explanation ... well done explaining it!

[@IcyDC5]

One of the best reviewers on KZbin! Great discussion and detail on Acura's SH-AWD vs the competition.

[@nojokes9011]

possibly the best explanation of the SH-AWD system I’ve heard

[@seleneperez7322]

Wow!! I’m so impressed by Alex’s expertise!!! Respect!

[@Sami.the.auto.advisor]

Acura should offer an A-Spec with the Advance Package. The standard wheels on the Advance are simply horrible.

[@pbm7858]

Agree but I feel that is what Type S will be

[@SSS-mp8th]

That is my same complaint, I'd want the HUD a few other things on Advance but I want it to handle and look like the ASpec.

[@RBzee112]

I bought an Advance. The wheels look much better in person. Like a medium gray color the changes in different lighting.

[@pbm7858]

@@RBzee112 agree to disagree, as design is subjective, but I feel that the Advance wheels are not fitting in with the most premium trim in the lineup. They look like something from 10 years ago, I'd argue the Tech trim wheels are more premium in style and today's trends

[@Sami.the.auto.advisor]

SS S exactly... I reckon there are many who wanted to buy the A-Spec for the looks, but later changed their minds due to the omission of HUD, surround view and adaptive dampers.

[@brodiwheeler7583]

Great review as always! You prefer chrome trim over blacked out trim??? How grown-up of you sir! 😆 Team No-Chrome! Blackout all the way! 🤙🏼

[@joetacchino4470]

Great detailed rundown on the AWD system Alex. I had a second gen MDX with SHAWD and it really, really worked. That vehicle neve felt FWD and you could really feel the diffs working if you were hustling it, or if you were in the snow. And that was a decade old model. This system sounds great for a transverse-based setup.

[@rogermoore8154]

I never get bored with your reviews, I enjoyed watching them! Your the best auto reviewer!

[@jordancohen4144]

Hi Alex, thank you so much for ALL of your videos! I was stuck between the X3 and the RDX. In the end, I took your advice from this video - I bought an RDX Platinum Elite (AKA the Canadian version of the Advanced trim) and I had the dealer deliver it to me with snow tires so I could go out and buy myself a set of summer wheels and tires. I ended up with a set of sweeeet Enkei wheels that give the car a much sportier appearance (the Advance wheels are ... well ... I think they belong on a Toyota Sienna), as well as a weight loss of about 7 lbs per corner and some sweet Conti DWS06 rubber. As you suggested, it made for a great combination. And even including over C$3k for wheels and tires, it was STILL C$10k less than an loaded X3 30i mSport that I was shopping it against. I had been on the fence for a long time, so once again, a sincere thank you!

[@goatsplitter]

Acura listened since this and there is an a-spec advance :) I test drove an a-spec over the weekend, definitely going to be buying it. Felt great in every aspect.

[@RBzee112]

I got the Advance in white with espresso seats and I love it!

[@swanblake]

I'm sorry

[@jacobbrigl5428]

If your coming from an older car to the RDX, you'll be more than pleased with the comfort of the suspension, cabin noise and technology. HUD, heated rear seats and heated steering wheel would be nice, but by no means necessary with all the features it has. I'm coming from a 2010 Subaru Legacy 3.6R Limited. Vast improvement to the RDX.

[@normt5463]

Jacob Brigl Car & Driver just tested the 2019 RDX 2.0T and it was almost a half second slower to 60 mph than the 2018 RDX V6.

[@jacobbrigl5428]

Norm T did you see where Car and driver test drove it? Elevation can drastically effect the 0 to 60 times. Where I'm at its half a second faster than the V6 2018. I'm about 5.7 seconds in my 2019.

[@lloydybenoit6766]

i have the shawd A Spec version , with a friend that weight 215 pound on board i registered 5.7 twice.

[@ChristianC-gy1ym]

Alex, your description of Acura's AWD system was amazing. So many people out there know the techs, but they don't quite understand how they play out in real life. You read all these comments on KZbin about how something trumps something else because of such and such. But they don't understand that at the end of the day, it comes down to simple physics.

[@normt5463]

웅이 Doesn't explain what conditions torque transfers or Acura just told him peak numbers without an explaination.

[@LS1007]

Norm T Is your name Alex? No, so STFU🤪

[@rg46979]

This is the measure by which all reviewers should be held. Outstanding!

[@docseland]

I bought the '19 RDX Advance with the diamond cut 20" rims. Black on black. Looks awesome with more of an executive SUV look and all of the great RDX features and performance. The suspension upgrade and HUD not being on the A-spec made the decision easy.

[@swanblake]

I'm sorry for your lost

[@ronaldregan4459]

That’s what I would do too. Can I ask how much they charged you for the 20” rims? Did you have to buy new tires as well? And do they let you keep the original Advance rims?

[@docseland]

Ronald Regan $3k for the rims and performance all season tires, which I believe are the same tires as the Aspec. I know people balk at this and you can sell your Advance rims and go online to Shop 20” aftermarket rims and tires, but I don’t have time for that. Plus when I saw the Black Advance RDX with the Acura 20” rims and tires, I knew I had found my car! Everything about this car is amazing and feels more futuristic, advanced and slightly roomier than the German competitors. Plus, the value competes with German SUVs costing around $65-70k! Bottom line is take one for a drive and see for yourself. Acura has a winner with the new RDX. And when the next upgrade to the engine comes around, look out!

[@Light23K]

@@docseland That's what I"m waiting for. I a.so want my power folding side mirrors. Type S please.

[@dtabarez04]

This guy is great for in depth reviews.

[@geft]

Alex, I totally agree that they need an A-Spec with Advance Package. I have the same issue with the TLX. I love my 2015 TLX Advance SH-AWD, but I can't get the new TLX A-Spec with the features I want. I'm also not happy that you can't get the RDX without the panoramic moonroof or get it with laminated glass. I'm not comfortable with my child being in a car with a tempered glass panoramic moonroof. I hope Acura changes its packaging strategy or I may be faced to look elsewhere for my next car :( Thanks again for another great review.

[@normt5463]

Jeff Taylor CR has brought this up again recently. The tempered glass is 4mm where GM panoroof is 5mm. Unless something drops on it it should be fine.

[@adamc1694]

Tempered glass indeed should be much stronger than sheet metal. That does not change however how I would prefer without the panoramic roof. Down here in Texas panoramic roof has little of use.

[@geft]

www.consumerreports.org/car-safety/laminated-glass-reduce-risk-exploding-sunroofs/

[@AznSL]

The black parts you mentioned look amazing with the APEX BLUE paint that's only available in the A-Spec trim That color combo is the main reason I like the A-spec trim! Especially since that specific blue is my favorite car color...

[@nyballer31]

Two things to really make this compete with the Audi Q5 is getting a type S varientso that A spec gets a propper engine to go with the agressive styling and secondly you got to have a full LCD instrument panel.Other wise I think Acura is on the right track.

[@atmartens]

1. I think in the future they’ll offer an Advanced with A-Spec. To many journalist bring up wanting packages from both. I think customers would agree. 2. As much as I’d love it, I don’t think there will be a Type S RDX. it’d be amazing but I see this as a TLX & ILX trim. 3. Color: the blue and bright red you can get are beautiful. Good review Alex.

[@joepah51]

Acura RDX is probably their most important vehicle right now.. And they have a great middle of the road small SUV.. They need more el caliente'!

[@vaneztax]

I always enjoy your detail technical review. Thanks

[@erich964]

Wonderful review. Separate note can everyone believe that an RDX is 50 grand out the door. Isn’t that hard to comprehend. 50 grand for the small compact not even the MDX. That’s called Price Creep absolutely hard to believe. Cars in general are absolutely unbelievably expensive these days this is a perfect example.

[@midiman5045]

Thanks for the great video. I appreciate your in depth. review. I just got a A Spec and I love it . I had a 1990 Acura legend and this car has brought back that fun I was missing. Acura just have great driving dynamics to me for the price. I in a way you are right about customizing your car but that can be said for any car. I think over all the A Spec other than missing the heads up display is a great bang for the buck.

[@Jeff-or6em]

Waiting to see the RDX Type S trim next year 😍

[@alliejr]

Great explanation of of the engineering and physics of different platforms.

[@alexandermaliy3515]

Acura is great, but, please, give us also RDX sport hybrid or R/S type with extra power, improved sport brakes, steering and extended wheel arches) that will be a bit like new NSX and will beat competitors)

[@normt5463]

Alexander Maliy RDX Hybrid was at the Pike's Peak Hill Climb. It did not finish.

[@LS1007]

Norm T Irrelevant! STFU🤪

[@dani32010]

Excellent review....

[@jondevansky186]

I have a Stelvio, and its awesome. Highly recommend.

[@swanblake]

Nicely done! Proper RWD based and gorgeous

[@lloydybenoit6766]

I texted drive it, it feels a little faster than the new RDX., I picked the RDX bc of its projected reliability . I had a Milano ,it was a very nice with all kind of problems. Congratulation. Good luck with it

[@williamwilson9205]

Great review Alex! We’re one month in on our 2019 RDX Advanced/AWD and are totally smitten. First time with a heads up display and now it feels like an essential feature. Love everything about it, but to me the transmission feels a little busy (but I still remember the 2 speed turbo hydramatic on our ‘64 Impala Super Sport). We planned on using our old Q5 when driving into town (Atlanta), but with all of the safety features and comfort and AMAZING ELS sound system, we’re risking it and using the new RDX. BTW, why aren’t dash cams an option in new cars?

[@cobra454tim]

Great information on the super handling all Wheel Drive Alex, thank you, as a car nap myself I enjoy this technical information I have a 2013 Subaru 3.6 R Legacy, it’s interesting to hear all the different AWD Dynamics!

[@LifeISMagix]

Finally 💪🏻🙌🏻 Alex, could you please review the Mazda CX-9 2019 GT or Signature model? That car seems overlooked but maybe it shouldn’t.

[@yogalin4458]

the RDX is the best value in the segment right now.

[@normt5463]

yoga lin Car & Driver just tested the 2019 RDX 2.0T and it was almost a half second slower to 60 mph than the 2018 RDX V6.

[@RBzee112]

Every other review, including Alex, says the 2019 is a 1/2 second faster than the 2018 RDX. In fact, the only base luxury CUV faster is the Stelvio. The 2019 RDX 0-60 is 5.7 seconds. The base Stelvio 0-60 is 5.4 seconds.

[@estradadavid702]

Norm T that had no correlation to yogas comment. We’re not comparing this RDX to the outgoing one. He’s comparing this RDX to other luxury brands

[@normt5463]

RB Zee Whose else has done data testing?

[@normt5463]

xNuckin_Futs The current one is slower but unlike the Accord 2.0T which faster than the V6 version.

[@nmarkert01]

How does the Aspec handle better when the advance is the only one with suspension changes? Seems like it can’t possibly handle better if the tire size isn’t even effecting MPG as it theoretically should.

[@jesusavalentin5439]

Lots of exaggerated remarks. As a previous owner of an mdx with s hawd and a mb GLK350 what makes a car fun to drive is how neutral the front to back dynamics of the vehicle are. Such a vehicle would be more fun to drive. Lots of rwd and fwd vehicles have such neutral feeling that makes the driver engaged. I personally preferred the GLK350.

[@opichocal]

My wife drives the 2014 RDX and she loves it. All these extra safety features are just another thing to break and cost big $$ to fix down the road. A friend. Of mine has the RL and the windshield cost him $2500 because of the automatic windshield wipers sensor. Ridiculous!

[@normt5463]

opichocal Good value, but slow. Car & Driver just tested the 2019 RDX 2.0T and it was almost a half second slower to 60 mph than the 2018 RDX V6.

[@swanblake]

Very true. Well said

[@Man-im4jv]

Hi Alex, when you talk about the QX50 being front wheel biased, are you pertaining to the new 2018 VCT Infiniti QX50? As I have the 2016 QX50 and it’s rear wheel biased afaik.

[@stephensquillacote8503]

Amazing video!

[@wsikshim]

The test drive was done in San Jose right? It looks just like the road near Sierra Vista Open Space Preserve!

[@revmotor]

The only Acura I find desirable.

[@normt5463]

anasim Honda minivan is faster in Motor Trend testing.

[@jsandhu6038]

2017 was the last with a true v6? no? loved that movdel

[@normt5463]

J Sandhu the 2018 RDX v6 is faster than the RDX 2.0T. The Motor Trend 2019 RDX 2.0T faired even worse of all formal tests with a 7.1 0-60 mph time or one full second behind the RDX v6.That follows Consumer Reports 7.0s and Car & Driver 6.6s ranging from a half second slower or more behind the prior generation with 3 5l. Even the lower power Buick Envision 2.0T with less power and four less speeds accelerated quicker, stopped shorter, and handled MT handling test better than the RDX. "RDX's vague braking feel and response. Given that Acura equipped the RDX with "limousine" brakes, slowing down precisely was frustrating for many. Said Scott Evans: "Trying to make a stop sign is much harder than it needs to be." "Acura's wide net leads to confusion about what aiming to be. "It's torn between being luxurious and soft like a Lincoln, sporty like an Alfa, or techy like an Audi, and those things sorta cancel each other out...on winding roads in Sport+ mode, but we didn't feel the emotion we expected."

[@iaviscorso2566]

Norm T .., & real mpg 3, 5..??.& 2.0 turbo...??

[@ericcioffi7309]

Great review. What Aspec parts would you add besides the tires and wheels to the Advanced trim? You said the Aspec handles better than the Advanced. Just because of tires? Thanks!

[@shatz72]

AWESOME review. I love the way you review cars in general and THANK YOU for explaining the Super handing. The RDX was on my short list but after watching your review I am pretty sure I will buying an RDX now. I like the A-Spec personally so that model/trim works for me. Acura should be sending you a cash bonus for the referral and really solid review.

[@dreiz.]

Stinger GT1 AWD vs RDX A-spec? I’m cross-shopping both as an all around sporty vehicle for daily driving with some road trips included for 2 people.

[@normt5463]

DreiZ The Motor Trend 2019 RDX 2.0T faired even worse of all formal tests with a 7.1 0-60 mph time or one full second behind the RDX v6.That follows Consumer Reports 7.0s and Car & Driver 6.6s ranging from a half second slower or more behind the prior generation with 3 5l. Even the lower power Buick Envision 2.0T with less power and four less speeds accelerated quicker, stopped shorter, and handled MT handling test better than the RDX. "RDX's vague braking feel and response. Given that Acura equipped the RDX with "limousine" brakes, slowing down precisely was frustrating for many. Said Scott Evans: "Trying to make a stop sign is much harder than it needs to be." "Acura's wide net leads to confusion about what aiming to be. "It's torn between being luxurious and soft like a Lincoln, sporty like an Alfa, or techy like an Audi, and those things sorta cancel each other out...on winding roads in Sport+ mode, but we didn't feel the emotion we expected."

[@LS1007]

Your comment has ZERO to do with the comment you’re replying to. Quit quoting statements from magazines, no one cares what you are saying!🤪

[@Larsiny911]

Deja vu at 13:40

[@3.3gen]

lol when I heard that I was on a different tab and I was like did he just say that twice

[@illyp1]

I bought a pearl white A-Spec back in June. I almost bought a white advanced and thought I could put fatter rims and tires on it but the chrome trim and smaller exhaust tips on the RDX models was also a bit of a turn off. I wouldn’t have bought an RDX if it wasn’t for that A spec trim that sold me on it.... It’s a great vehicle that Acura can seriously bank on and keep improving. They really need to update their whole lineup to make it equal to the RDX

[@MrEggmando]

I am considering buying the base model all wheel drive. Great price with lots of standard goodies. Alex I love your reviews but the they mostly cover the more expensive trims. You're not alone most reviewers do the same thing. Anyone know if the base trim has any major draw backs. I knoe it isn't as quiet as the top trim but is it noisier then mid levels? I'm looking for a guiet ride.

[@siddharthsood2399]

I'm on the tech package. One trim higher... It's pretty quiet. But it's a sporty vehicle so it's a trade-off

[@realbeetlejuice]

Bored? this is what we wanna know! luv ya Alex

[@hasanz5259]

Same game Acura is playing for too long. Come mid cycle refresh, I bet RDX advance+A spec will be available with rear LED turn lights. That's how they keep a design going for 5+ years like the aging MDX.

[@ShowMeWhatINeedToKnow]

Consider adding "steering feel" and "transmission" category to your reviews. There are a lot of decent cars out there that essentially fail in these two categories -- potential customers and auto manufacturers need to pay more attention to this. The last ILX and TLX I test drove had the worst steering feel I've ever experienced in my life (absolutely no feedback) -- and there were unacceptably long delays in jumping down multiple gears in their transmissions. And I know electric steering decently well -- I've owned 4 cars with electric power steering, and driven many more. Of course, they are all plagued with numbness, but relative to each other, some are considerably better than others.

[@normt5463]

Show Me What I Need To Know some things are hard to describe like bushing diameter and their elasticity the ways steering ratios work transmission ratios torque converter Flash it helps to look at the data but no one has actually road-tested the Acura RDX until car driver did a test and showed it was very slow.

[@bigwilliearmitage]

@@normt5463 Better than Buick crap

[@normt5463]

@@bigwilliearmitage Consumer Reports Emergency Lane Change Test, braking from 60 mph. Buick Envision 55.5 mph, 128 ft Q5 52.2 mph, 130 ft RDX 52.5, 127 ft X3 53.0 moh, 130 ft Macan 51.5 mph, 130 ft MDX 52.5 mph, 135 ft NX 50 mph, 132 ft C&D has the Envision braking from 70 mph at a segment topping 158 ft. You want to compare Buick to the Acura in reliability? Out of possible 5 Envision- 4 Q5- 2 RDX - 2 X3- 2 Macan- 3 MDX- 4 NX - 5

[@normt5463]

@@bigwilliearmitage The Buick Envision 2.0T is putting down a faster 27.5s figure-8 time vs 2019 CX-5 2.5T and 2019 RDX 2.0T at 27.7 in Motor Trend testing. That continues in an Emergency Lane test by Consumer Reports that has the Envision 2.0T doing 55.5 mph while the CX-5(non-turbo) did 54 mph and the RDX 2.0T can only go 52.5 mph. For 2019 Envision 2.0T gets a new 9-speed and 295 lb-ft of torque, 316 lb-ft of torque on overboost. The twin clutch and torque vectoring AWD is something that Mazda cannot match only able to use brakes on a single on a wheel for torque vectoring. The Hiperstrut, as also seen on Honda Civic Type-R as dual axis strut, eliminates any torque steer under accleration. At a discounted $35K the Envision Prem ll offers heads up display, adaptive high beams and articulating HID, adaptive cruise control with full stopping, tri-zone climate control, sliding rear seat, 12-volt outlet, along with Buick's longer warranty than Mazda.

[@hoxious]

Would it be possible to acquire the black trims and add it to an advanced package version after market? Like he said, modify your own a-spec?

[@JordsterMovies]

Hi Alex, I have a question: You have tested this vehicle more than once, including the initial press-event in Whistler BC (with elevation) and have consistently found it doing 0-60 in under 6 seconds. MotorTrend and CarAndDriver both repeatedly took closer to 6.5 seconds. Your results are usually more in line with the rest. Any insight into why this might be the case?

[@eldev4432]

My question is, and sadly was not answered, does it perform well in the snow like a Subaru or any of the other AWD CUV's?

[@mikeceli]

Hi Alex. Is the "Torque Vectoring Rear Axle" basically the same as what was called "Limited Slip Differential" or "Traction Lock" in rear wheel drive American cars of your?

[@benhaze1010]

Excellent review! But for Canadian customers the pricing is not so competitive

[@KickingIt-In-the-Kitchen]

What would be a good price a month to lease this A- speck? With how much down?

[@mikem.2688]

Very informative. Thanks for this.

[@ChristianC-gy1ym]

I just don't get it... Honda has their "Si" and "Type R" versions of certain vehicles. Yet, where are Acura's high performance variations? I'm not talking about the NSX. And if Honda thinks that there is no market for a high performance RDX/MDX/TLX/ILX, they're crazy. Hello guys. How about you take a look at Infiniti, BMW, Audi, etc?

[@pbm7858]

Acura has committed to return of Type S

[@normt5463]

웅이 Car & Driver just tested the 2019 RDX 2.0T and it was almost a half second slower to 60 mph than the 2018 RDX V6.

[@ChristianC-gy1ym]

@@normt5463 , that still doesn't convince me that the V6 engine is their performance model...

[@normt5463]

웅이 well after pikes.peak the Acura RDX did not show and did not run so I don't expect a RDX hybrid anytime soon.

[@wirelessg14]

Editing error: At 13:33 Alex starts talking about the instrument cluster, but it repeats at 13:40 :-) Regardless, excellent video.

[@mmone1178]

Thanks for sharing

[@falcon64z8]

That looks like a fun road to drive on, where is that at?

[@mrahul3000]

Acura getting back it's mojo. Next Overhaul the Acura TLX, it should be using this 10 speed or that 8 speed dual clutch. Now I understand the value of a Halo car. The Acura NSX is loosely doing what the Audi R8 did to that brand (though sales of the NSX do not reelect this). It's genes are percolating through to the rest of the vehicle lineup.

[@davidc-l9174]

@Alex how does Acura overdrive the rear wheels? Are they using a wet clutch that allows the front wheels to turn at a different speed?

[@sportscar1000]

While I commend your knowledge, can you honestly rate the mpg when you compare this on the video to hybrid models?

[@intelmike181]

I think it is a great option in the segment, I just wish the A-spec was an option and not a trim...

[@fitzgoblin81]

Which is better in the snow and ice?

[@normt5463]

Car & Driver just tested the 2019 RDX 2.0T and it was almost a half second slower to 60 mph than the 2018 RDX V6.

[@PLATINUM2U]

V6 would be the better choice for reliability

[@adamc1694]

V6 should be faster above 50mph. Stop and go pick up stronger low end toque turbo wins.

[@PLATINUM2U]

@@adamc1694 agreed!

[@normt5463]

Adam Chan No the 2.0T carrys torque up higher into the rpms and should be faster just like the Acoord 2.0T is faster than the V6.

[@lloydybenoit6766]

they don't know what they are talking about

[@toh3211]

Why can't they put in speedometer in the LCD display?? How hard can it be?

[@samliang4146]

Did you say rdx gonna put a twin turbo 6 soon? Where is the source and do you have more detail for that?

[@stephanematis]

Alex, would love to know the road you drove in this video.

[@Agent77X]

Why no Advance package with A-Spec? Acura determine it would be to pricey and would enter into German luxury brands such as X3, GLC, Q5, etc...

[@pbm7858]

That's what Type S will likely be

[@normt5463]

HW2800 Car & Driver just tested the 2019 RDX 2.0T and it was almost a half second slower to 60 mph than the 2018 RDX V6.

[@estradadavid702]

Norm T stop spamming this comment

[@LS1007]

Norm T You’re like an annoying little neighbor kid that won’t shut up and doesn’t know when to go home!🤪

[@camerabrah]

If it were your money would you get The RDX or the new BMW X2? They are similar in price. Thanks in advance.

[@normt5463]

tron3 the $36K Buick Envision 2.0T with torque vectoring AWD has my money. With 295 lb-ft torque and more features included

[@gtboss281]

rdx

[@LS1007]

Norm T Again, your comment has ZERO relevance to the above comment. It was not aimed at you and even if it was, you didn’t even answer the question.🤪

[@rickardsvensson6252]

Do you have any plans to make a review of the new GMC Sierra?

[@chencheng5776]

Does it requires premium gas?

[@7dragons10heads]

Just recommended.

[@JordsterMovies]

Honda "recommends" regular fuel for the exact same engine in the Accord 2.0T. The difference? When they "recommend" premium they can advertise it as 272hp, whereas on regular they can only advertise it as 252hp. It's 100% the same engine.

[@PowerOva]

Does the 2019 Acura RDX take premium fuel or regular?

[@arthurs7882]

111ft 60-0 is groundbreaking for this segment

[@swanblake]

Not at all. Look up BMW X340iM

[@thomaseskew8692]

Blake Swan Not sure that counts as “this segment”. The bmw is about $20k more optioned out.

[@joethebet7177]

Does this come with heated steering wheel?

[@normt5463]

Consumer Reports got 7.0s 0-60 mph and averaged 22 mpg for the 2019 RDX. It was slow through the Emergency Lane Change test at 52.5 mph, or 3 mph slower than Buick Envision 2.0T at 55.5 mph. SH-AWD...what?

[@ARKSpunky1]

Probably my age but I can't stand black wheels. Will always remind me of a spare and look cheap. Great review as usual. Thanks Alex

[@kevinszhere1]

Spunky1 yea you old, time to leave the world to us

[@joetacchino4470]

Hey does anyone know how the 0-60 time of the 2019 4 cylinder compares to the 2018 V6? This is really important that I know this knowledge. If only some major media outlet had done this test and it was available for me to review. Oh gosh, whatever shall I do?

[@meugzy]

6.6s www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2019-acura-rdx-a-spec-value-not-performance

[@lloydybenoit6766]

I had Mobil fuel, my A Spec did 0 to 60 in 5.7 secs . The new RDX without a doubt should be the fastest vehicle of Acura line up beside the NSX

[@normt5463]

The fastest data is C&D at 6.6s. They figure in atmosphere in and are usually the quickest. 7.2-7.4 in a video by Everyman Driver at 2,200 feet elevation.

[@normt5463]

Lloyd Y Benoit did you do a two way average?

[@vfonte218]

It says in the video 5.7 seconds I think that is impressive in a crossover

[@MoeGreensRightEye]

i want a-spec with hud

[@eleanormassaro5195]

MoeGreensLeftEye I want an A-Spec with rainsensing wipers😎

[@bassandtrebleclef]

Great car, but old guys like me want the combination of good handling + good stereo + good seats. Need that extending thigh cushion and without it, this A-Spec is off my list and increases the cost quite a bit. That's a bummer.

[@tomeng9520]

Volvo you just type.

[@kartv75]

where's the stick though?

[@normt5463]

bassandtrebleclef Buick Emvision 2.0T has that and costs much less with discounts.

[@augustrushdesigns3890]

I wonder how well the AWD on the 2019 Nissan Altima will be?.. (I know it doesn't compare to this RDX)

[@normt5463]

AugustRushDesigns Altima 2.0T will be quicker than Mazda 2.5t ht no AWD. The QX50 has already been tested to be faster than the Car & Driver 2019 RDX test of 6.6s.

[@augustrushdesigns3890]

Interesting.... I will probably get the new Altima after its mid-cycle refresh around 2022, but the reliability of the VC-turbo has yet to be proven (since it's so new). The addition of AWD was a smart move, the new Altima seems to be a well put together vehicle.

[@LS1007]

Norm T Irrelevant! 🤪

[@ryanlittleton5615]

Finally, an Acura that doesn't suck. Well, besides the NSX.

[@lloydybenoit6766]

Stop, remember the early 90s Integra ,RL and NSX ,give their engineers 4 years they will mess things up. Typical Acura.

[@ryanlittleton5615]

@@lloydybenoit6766 Ok, besides the early 90's. I was talking about the last several years of Acura's line up, just uninspired dribble.

[@lloydybenoit6766]

I like my new RDX, it's fast and the interior looks great but the decision makers at Acura should have at least give us 2 engines, the t 2.0 is nice engine but I think a t 3.0 eng as option would have been great. I tested my A spec 3 times 0 to 60 ,5.7 ,5.9 and 5.7.

[@ryanlittleton5615]

@@lloydybenoit6766 I agree the new RDX is a very nice car, what I meant is that the last few years of Acuras were just not really competitive with their rivals and not really worth the upgrade in some cases versus their Honda equivalents IMO. The new RDX (and NSX) finally changes that, and I'm actually quite excited about that and what they're going to do in the future.

[@normt5463]

Was the upshifts still harsh? Owners complain about rough 2-3 shifts.

[@ryanlittleton5615]

Wrong transmission, you're thinking of that POS ZF 9-Speed. I wish Honda/Acura would just get rid of it already. But, apparently it's even worse in FCA vehicles.

[@normt5463]

Ryan Littleton No, new owners of 2019 RDX are complaining about harsh upshifts and the dealer said there is nothing they can do right now.

[@ryanlittleton5615]

@@normt5463 Source? Show me, post it here. I've already researched it and can't find anything. Perhaps I've missed something.

[@ks1ngh27]

As nice as this looks and drives, 45k is high for a compact SUV. Acura has done amazing job on this.

[@김동준-t9p]

Hi norm t :)

[@askhowiknow5527]

I think my civic has a fancier gauge cluster

[@_baller]

How is this power train in an suv and not in the ILX? Lol... Cmon Acura you're almost there

[@yankeedoodle6293]

Gotta love those dad jeans

[@Ficon]

RDX seats are way too short. Even the top-spec seats don't extend far enough for a normal height driver and the front edge of the seat steeply falls away leaving the thighs extra unsupported. Didn't even bother test-driving because it was so uncomfortable. QX50 seats are even worse with abhorrent headrests. Why can't Japanese designers sit in a German car and make normal seats?

[@meugzy]

This acura is a really good car but not fast. Infiniti qx50 is faster according to motortrend. From motortrend At the test track, it was a bit of a toss-up. The 268-hp crossover recorded a 0-60 mph time of 6.6 seconds and a 15.1-second quarter mile at 91.6 mph. That's a good bit slower than the last 280-hp Alfa Romeo Stelvio Ti Sport we tested but slightly quicker than the 272-hp Acura RDXA-Spec.

[@normt5463]

Babs The Motor Trend 2019 RDX 2.0T faired even worse of all formal tests with a 7.1 0-60 mph time or one full second behind the RDX v6.That follows Consumer Reports 7.0s and Car & Driver 6.6s ranging from a half second slower or more behind the prior generation with 3 5l. Even the lower power Buick Envision 2.0T with less power and four less speeds accelerated quicker, stopped shorter, and handled MT handling test better than the RDX. "RDX's vague braking feel and response. Given that Acura equipped the RDX with "limousine" brakes, slowing down precisely was frustrating for many. Said Scott Evans: "Trying to make a stop sign is much harder than it needs to be." "Acura's wide net leads to confusion about what aiming to be. "It's torn between being luxurious and soft like a Lincoln, sporty like an Alfa, or techy like an Audi, and those things sorta cancel each other out...on winding roads in Sport+ mode, but we didn't feel the emotion we expected."

[@_baller]

What the rdx goes 0 to 60 in 5 and a half seconds

[@titanium7992]

I traded my 2016 TLX SH-AWD (V6) for a 2019 RDX SH-AWD A-Spec. Although I haven't recorded the 0-60 time yet on RDX it feels quicker because of the new 10 speed transmission. The TLX was no slouch. I have a MINI Cooper S that reaches 60 mph in 6.2 seconds. This RDX feels quicker. I'd bet if I raced them both the RDX would win. There's no way the RDX takes 7 seconds to reach 60 mph.

[@XavierMathewsEntertainment]

tommy d u b b s I believe it's 5.7 seconds. I own the ASpec. It definitely pushes you back in your seat. The torque is no joke.

[@_baller]

@@XavierMathewsEntertainment epic enough for an suv

[@RBzee112]

You forgot to mention the black headliner, the paddle shifters are metal accented, and the metal sport pedals.

[@joethebet7177]

RDX Type S pls to competer with SQ5 or RSQ5

[@normt5463]

joe TheBet Car & Driver just tested the 2019 RDX 2.0T and it was almost a half second slower to 60 mph than the 2018 RDX V6.

[@joethebet7177]

Norm T oh shttt then

[@Av3ntur0zky]

@@normt5463 you r a hater sr.

[@Agent77X]

No electronic damping in the A-Spec version, only the Advance model.

[@bam2xl14]

I'm sooooo pissed the A-Spec don't have HUD

[@columbiars]

I don't think it is a cuv. It is a suv, at least a-spect package.

[@scottw7492]

Is this worth $15k more than the CRV

[@beamboy420]

On the Struggle Bus W that’s subjective. If you want that kind of power and handling absolutely yes and some luxury features. One thing CRV will be better is Gas mileage.

[@vistastructions]

IMO no. Infotainment is more intuitive on the CR-V and the CR-V is more reliable. If this were 5-7k more than I would consider but 15k more is too much for me.

[@scottw7492]

vistastructions I sure do like the looks. Just can’t justify the spend

[@RBzee112]

Yes it is worth it.

[@joa8593]

No, at that price difference you can upgrade in just a few years and always have the latest tech. This is the problem with luxury brands these days.

[@danielgutzz]

so is it not a true AWD???