2022 Atomic Maverick 100 Ti Ski Review with SkiEssentials.com

[@stevee.4957]

Can we get a compilation of all the "and I'm Bob" (waving) clips? I really have no reason for this request other than I think 10 minutes of "and I'm Bob" would be hysterical. Keep up the great work guys.

[@SkiEssentials]

Hahaha! That would be pretty funny. If it didn't feel like it would take forever to put together, I'd be all over it. Maybe this summer when there's more free time...

[@perfectmoment]

This is a truly funny idea for a video!

[@nickguyy5]

Wow, amazing video production. The team is always finding new ways to make the videos better and reflective of your passion for skiing.

[@SkiEssentials]

Thank you Nick!

[@michaeldraper8998]

These are definitely on my list for next season! Looking forward to more reviews!

[@twohouses2259]

Hahahahahahahaha.... Bob: “How is it?” Jeff: “Looks pretty safe...” ( ..if you go first that is Bob....)

[@pewpewpew8390]

handflex this at local shop and checked it out, it reminds me a lot of the BC100 with a touch of metal, turned a tad more directional

[@SkiEssentials]

Yeah to me it feels like they took inspiration from the BC100, Backland 100, then added some metal. Today I skied the BC 100, Backland 100, and Maverick 100 all back to back to back and it was super interesting to feel the differences between them.

[@SpressoMan]

Great video! I've really been waiting for this review. Love your work, and I love your passion.

[@FreeFloFloss]

How exciting! Thanks for the video! I can`t wait to try them

[@PIFDIY]

I have the Vantage 100 CTI and the Bent Chetler 100. I choose the Vantage almost any day that I want to ski a 100mm ski. The Vantage 100 does every the BC does imo, but allows for more fun on firm flat snow. Powerful and stable but still playful and versatile. Construction is comparable but would you guys say that the Maverick 100 is very similar to the Vantage?

[@SkiEssentials]

It's similar in what it accomplishes, but feels different. The Vantage is stiffer and lighter. Mavericks have a lot more vibration damping and feel smoother, but are still more responsive, more powerful, and with greater torsional stiffness than the Bent 100.

[@poduss44]

Just added them to my collection. Now i only have atomic skis lol. Sold my enforcers for the mavericks. I also have S9 and Backland 107 for touring. Love the backlands quickness so decided to buy the maverick

[@SkiEssentials]

Sweet! I think you'll really like them. I like the idea of basing your decision off the quickness of the Backland. The Maverick has a very similar characteristic and overall feel. I expect you'll prefer the way it feels over your Enforcers. Lighter, quicker, more reactive.

[@gregorydavid5894]

Great review, you guys obviously love this ski. Maybe the ski I am looking for. In soft snow and deeper days I ski Liberty Origin 112, I have a pair of older Fisher 108 ti's that really are going to be my tour ski for a bit, I love the way they carve, and how quick and light they are, and with decent float, but I find them them fatiguing in heavy chop, or rough packed trails, so I would be happy touring, skiing powder and trees, carving and soft bumps on them. I had Master Blasters since 2017, just sold them. Though I loved the skis I found myself skiing the liberty 112 in preference when there was any snow and also on crusty snow because the swing weight of the Liberty's felt much lighter. Conversely I never found the Master Blasters had much grip in on hard pack/icyish groomers and even on the 181's I found them a tad sluggish and with their weight and how much tail there is behind you. When I was tired I often felt the ski was skiing me. I now have a pair of Liberty V82's which I find great on groomers, bumps and firmer off trail situations. (I have dipped my toes into technical skiing) So I really need a ski in the middle, the other ski I have my eye on is the Volkl M6, but as you say the tail of the Maverick is much easier to release, I guess I will have to ski both which is always a logistical problem.

[@SkiEssentials]

Hey Gregory! It does sound like it could be a great ski for you, especially if versatility and specifically edge release is important to you. I do think it falls in between the skis you already own quite nicely. The M6 Mantra is a fantastic ski. It's heavier, more precise, and pulls you into a turn more on groomers, but the Maverick is definitely a more versatile ski. Lighter on your feet too and it sounds like that's a relatively important factor for you. Hope that helps!

[@gregorydavid5894]

@@SkiEssentials Thank you! I will hopefully find a pair to demo.

[@mazproteg]

95mm 80% resort 20 for skin it is a good choice whit a shift binding? Or is better the backland 100 Thanks

[@SkiEssentials]

I think Maverick is the way to go. Even if you were like 50/50, I'd still be leaning towards Maverick. Backland feels more like an 20/80 ski to me.

[@hagi991]

@skiessentials.com How do they compare to the Bent Chetler 100? Also are you going to be talking about the new Bent Chetler 100 2022 edition? I am holding back on buying the 2021 to see what and if anything changes in the 2022 ones other than the graphic.But also could consider these Mavericks, hence my first question

[@SkiEssentials]

No changes to the Bent Chetler other than graphics. That ski has a softer flex pattern, easier to bend it in a turn, but not as much raw power as the Maverick. Also easier edge release on the Bent Chetler mostly thanks the the HRZN Tech tail.

[@hagi991]

@@SkiEssentials Thanks for the reply :) Think I will go with the 2021 Bent Chetlers in this case, heard a lot of good things about that ski from various sources

[@ianholmquist8492]

@@hagi991 if it helps at all, I love the bent chetler 100. Have about 45-50 days on em. I have the 188 and I'm 6ft and 200lbs. However, If i could only own one pair of skis, I would not choose them simply because I like a ski to be kinda stiff and mean. And I find myself using the chetlers for soft snow/pow days. They are poppy and playful and invite one to jib about.

[@dbquek]

Great review guys....good stuff

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks!

[@DavidKholz]

Thank you for the content you put out! Did you per chance get to test out the völkl rise above 88 2021? I'm considering it for touring with a king pin (and probably 30% on piste). I'm worried it's to narrow, you know what I mean?

[@SkiEssentials]

We haven't really done much testing on that ski, no, but 88 is perfectly reasonable for a lightweight touring ski in my opinion.

[@Kenny_Edmonton]

What’s your favourite helmet and goggle combo? What are you using at the moment for this ski season coming up? Great review on this ski, looking at this ski or the maverick 95

[@SkiEssentials]

It's hard to argue against the Maverick 100, especially if softer snow is on your plate at all. Currently, I have a Bern Watts Carbon helmet with a Smith I/O Max XL. Jeff has a Sweet Protection Switcher helmet and bounces between Clockwork and Interstellar (favorite) goggles also from Sweet.

[@nick-knock]

Was waiting for this ski review! Could potentially be my new ski for next year! How would you say this compares to the Salomon stance 102 for riding east coast terrain mainly?

[@SkiEssentials]

I think the biggest difference is weight. The Stance 102 feels a lot heavier on your feet. It also has more pronounced rocker, so feels heavier and smeary. The Maverick is definitely way more agile, and more responsive too. There are certainly benefits to both, but yeah, to me they feel like pretty different skis.

[@jaredmayo7138]

Do you think this ski would be too close to the 90 vantage ti to justify buying? I am looking for a second pair of skis that would be better off trail, but I’m kind of all over the place with what I want.But this ski seems like it could be a good option too me.

[@SkiEssentials]

No, it's quite a bit different than the Vantage. The shape feels far more versatile.

[@gilliesniper99]

Did you guys get a chance to test the 88ti? Any impression or can we expect a review?

[@SkiEssentials]

Yes! Great ski. More nimble than the 100 and really knifes through soft snow. Bob was actually skiing it last week for a while. We'll definitely have a review of it before next season, and it will be in our 2022 Ski Test results as well.

[@johnwalkowiak8663]

Your description sounds like my description of the Rossi E94. How do you think it compares with the E94 and the new E92? So many great sounding skis to choose from today!!

[@SkiEssentials]

Biggest difference is the tail shape and edge release. The Mavericks release their tail edge more easily, Experience 92 and 94 both feel more precise, but not as surfy/smeary in softer snow.

[@johnwalkowiak8663]

@@SkiEssentials Thanks! I hope I can demo them at some point.

[@dave-tu2vz]

Damn jeff those jumps were sooo cool! Next year I wanna see you at xgames, if the judges will remain the same you could easily beat Jesper

[@SkiEssentials]

Hahahaha! Ya know... Knuckle Huck is probably the only X Games event where I could come close to holding my own...

[@miguelmattos6430]

I'm thinking of buying an atomic ski. I'm in between the maverick and the Bent Chetler 100. I really like to carve, but right now I'm getting more into going off piste and learning more freestyle/park skills. Which would you recommend

[@SkiEssentials]

If you're going to be taking it into the park, even a little, I would go with the Bent Chetler. It's way more appropriate in the park and still a good all-mountain ski too. If you take park out of the equation, I'd generally recommend the Maverick for everything else you're looking for, but the BC 100 will be way better in the park.

[@rockyshoresstudios4987]

Which would you suggest Maverick 100 or MPro 99, I’m on the west coast.

[@SkiEssentials]

Both are great! M-Pro feels a little more responsive out of the tail. In fact, tail stiffness might be the biggest difference between those two skis. Gives the Maverick a little more playfulness off-piste and the Maverick a little more surfy/smeary. Overall, fairly similar, but those are the differences I feel most.

[@Dheorl]

Have you guys been on the 95 as well? How to they compare? Seemingly very similar weight wise despite the narrower width, does that make the 95 any stiffer/more demanding? I'm looking for something to maybe stick a Duke PT on for a 2 ski quiver alongside my very piste orientated carving ski. Both this and the Ripstick 96 black edition seem like quite nice options, what would be your thoughts on them? (worth noting that although I have a skinny carving ski and want to put a Duke on these, they'll still be using in resort more than anything else)

[@SkiEssentials]

They're very similar overall. I don't find the 95 any more demanding than the 100, it's just a little quicker edge to edge and feels a little more precise because of that. All 3 of these skis (Ripstick Black included) would be good options for a Duke PT. If you already have a narrower ski, I think I'd either go with the Ripstick 96 or Maverick 100 just for a little more float in soft snow. The Ripstick has more pronounced rocker, so the 96 is going to float more than the Maverick 95. That rocker profile might be the biggest difference in their feel too, including the 100. The Ripsticks are a little easier to release and pivot, while the Mavericks are a little more responsive out of the tips and tails. Hope that helps!

[@mejs2579]

Seems like this is kind of a hybrid of the backlands and Bent Chetler. Playful but stiff at the same time. "Balance" as you said. What are your thoughts?

[@SkiEssentials]

Sort of, yeah, at least in the sense that it has more of a Backland shape, but more Bent Chetler versatility. It definitely feels stronger and more powerful than the Bent Chetler, however.

[@owenlappe8303]

I’m only on my 8th time skiing, not the best just a beginner. I bought the atomic savor 5 just for a beginner ski, but I feel like with skis like this I would get better rapidly. The atomic savor 5 is pretty terrible on crud, and seems to be a heavy ski. I’m 6’3 165 pounds. What size on the maverick would you go with? I currently have 167cm on the savor 5. Thank you!

[@SkiEssentials]

Honestly, probably 180 cm. I know that's a lot longer than what you've been skiing, but at your height, it still feels like a good choice to me. If that makes you nervous, 172 would work too and would be easier to control and turn, you just might outgrow it so to speak. Hope that helps!

[@jondoe19896091]

what goggles are you wearing? it looks awesome

[@SkiEssentials]

Sweet Protection Interstellar. I also wear the Clockwork.

[@loganjacobson2335]

Hey just wondering. How would you guys compare the Ripstick 106 vs the blaze 106. I love lightweight skis but I also love a decent amount of power for hard pack. Do the elans have a significant amount more edge grip?

[@SkiEssentials]

The biggest difference in my opinion is the turn radius and the style of turn they like to make. I do think the Ripstick has more edge grip, but the more noticeable difference is that it prefers a shorter, more mid-radius carve. The Blaze has a much bigger turn radius, so doesn't feel like it comes across the fall line as easily in a carve, but has smooth edge release even in deep snow. They're similar skis in terms of weight and what you can do with them, but there's some significant differences in their shape.

[@crazychickens1000]

would you recommend this ski over the J ski hotshot for an intermediate/advanced heavy skier?

[@SkiEssentials]

Yes, I would. I find the Mavericks feel more precise and a higher-quality ski than any J Skis I've been on.

[@tiesvanroij7834]

Hello! Will you be looking into the atomic chandler 100s 2022?

[@SkiEssentials]

Yes, we will likely have a Bent Chetler 100 review sometime over the summer.

[@cdeion]

Do you see a difference between Atomic Maverick 95 ti vs Armada Declivity 92 ti ? Same cie, more? Tks!

[@SkiEssentials]

Yeah, for sure. They're close in performance overall, although I find the Declivity a little smoother on a groomer and the Maverick a little more versatile off-piste.

[@cdeion]

And do you think the Declevity looks more like the Faction dictator 2.0, all-mountain too ? I hesitate a lot btw these 2 skis 🎿 many thanks!

[@jacekkawczynski4066]

Pls 2022 Black Diamond Impulse next

[@tonyg3091]

Jeff rocks the same helmet as me, coooool!

[@brycewilliams98]

What brand and model? Sizing pretty standard?

[@tonyg3091]

@@brycewilliams98 Sweet protection Switcher. If you are on the upper limit of the size, go one up. I am 58,5 cm and went for 59-61. Fits perfect.

[@jacekkawczynski4066]

Hey I am an advanced skier. I ski at Alta and I am looking for a good all mountain/big mountain ski. I am deciding between the CT 2.0 Kore 105 Prodigy 3.0 and Declivity 102 ti? Maybe also the BC 100. I like a ski that charges well, yet is playful enough to have fun and do tricks or flips. I also love cliffs! What would you recommend? I am 125 lbs 5’ 8”. Sorry for the long comment

[@michaelhuber3610]

I bought a pair of bentchetler 100s a month ago and my friend bought a pair of declivity 102 TI’s last month too- armadas are defiantly a bit higher end being a stiffer ski that has metal in it- so better at speed and more stable and requires a more advanced skier to ski, my bentchetlers compared to his skis are softer cause the ye have no metal so more forgiving, less stable at speed but more playful- I personally love them and my friend loves his armadas- hope this helps

[@pewpewpew8390]

2021 CT 2.0 is a pretty stiff/heavy beast, think they are 630 grams per per ski more than the mavrick 100ti

[@src248]

Check out Sego skis as well, they make a couple models that would probably work for you, haven't tried them myself but the reviews on them are very positive

[@jacekkawczynski4066]

Thanks guys

[@bretskating2]

Do you know when the atomic Bent Chetler 100s for 2022 will be released?

[@SkiEssentials]

I don't believe they're doing an early release on those, so probably not available until mid-summer.

[@jons7e]

9.8 from the air competition judges

[@SkiEssentials]

Feels excessive, but I'll take it.

[@154jdt]

How does the Maverick compare to the Alchemist Wailer 100 RP in terms of all mountain performance?

[@SkiEssentials]

Much bigger turn radius and a longer effective edge on the Maverick. It's a more powerful ski overall as well. The Wailer feels quicker, more agile in tight trees, but you definitely lose some edge grip/stability.

[@michaelstronach9774]

How does this Ski compare to a QST 98? I’m a intermediate going advanced skier from British Columbia. I ski groomed-piste, off piste, powder, occasional tours and very little park. Which would you recommend?

[@SkiEssentials]

The tail of the Maverick is the biggest difference--it's pretty stiff and exacting while the QST is playful and smeary. Underfoot, they're about in the same league, with both skis able to carve clean and round turns. I definitely like the QST in softer and deeper snow while the Maverick is a solid carver, but is light for having metal, so it's pretty darn quick and maneuverable. I'd lean to the QST based on your stats and application.

[@rainervasshaug8087]

How does it fare As a one quiver ski compared to the justis? I’m 1,9 m, 87 kg. Intermediate leaning towards advanced skier. I’m currently running the line opus 2014. Looking for a more stable all round ski.

[@SkiEssentials]

They're both very versatile and would work well as a one ski quiver. Justis feels heavier and surfier, more pronounced rocker. The Maverick is lighter and more agile, more responsive as well. Both skis are quite stable at speed.

[@rainervasshaug8087]

@@SkiEssentials thanks🤗

[@paulydee1]

Nice Review - I looking forward to seeing u do a review on the new qst98.

[@SkiEssentials]

We should have a review up within the next 2-3 weeks! Just waiting for a longer length for some of our bigger testers. We've already skied it quite a bit (I even core-shotted a brand new one on its very first run... sorry Salomon)... (I also fixed it).

[@goat165]

How would you rate these for Minnesota and Upper Michigan skiing?

[@SkiEssentials]

Hello! I think it's a perfect reasonable choice for that region. It still performs well on firm conditions, and is a ton of fun in soft snow too. Relatively similar to here in northern VT, maybe we get a little more snow, but comparable, and I find it to be plenty appropriate or around here.

[@joesalemi2414]

I like how they used skiers of different styles and abilities. I’m a 64 year old BOOMER and I would really like to develop a boomer quiver. Don’t laugh. So for example 10 years ago, I’d go tot he Brahma or Kendo but now I’m on a pair of 2020 experience 88s for my everyday ski. My fresh snow ski is the now discontinued Soul 7 to complete my BOOMER QUIVER, don’t laugh. I’m sure u get my concept. I need a ski that will carve when I’m up for it but still let’s me back off when I’m tired. In Pow and cut up I need to not get deflected around and it does not need to be a fast ski. What skis would you put in a BOOMER QUIVER? Why? Bcuz I ain’t done yet.

[@SkiEssentials]

This Maverick 100 TI would be pretty cool to fill the niche between your Experience 88 and Soul 7!

[@mrsmartypants_1]

Joe you gave up too soon 😂. Do you like that Soul 7? Personally I can’t abide those floppy skis. This Atomic does sound like an excellent ski for what you’re looking for.

[@JonoP2463]

Atomic Maverick 100 TI or Rossignol Black Ops Sender TI? I’ve only skied groomers in Europe, but now I live really close to Whistler so I’ll be spending a lot of time skiing in British Columbia. Any advice is appreciated

[@SkiEssentials]

HI Johnathan! The Maverick is a better on-trail carver in terms of edge grip and stability. It's also lighter, so that makes it pretty darn maneuverable. I personally prefer the feel and character of the Maverick over the Sender Ti, but not by a whole lot. I think it's more versatile as well, while Sender Ti is better suited to softer snow and bigger lines. Have fun! SE

[@michaelhuber3610]

Wait so we have the bentchetler 100, backland 107 and these maverick 100- all these three skis look so similar so what really is the difference?

[@SkiEssentials]

It does seem silly on paper, but they all have a different personality. The Backland 100 is far lighter than both the BC 100 and Maverick. 1400 g is really, really light, so realistically more of a touring ski than a resort ski. The Maverick gives you a very, very similar shape, but with a construction that's better suited to more aggressive skiing and in-bounds resort terrain. Bent Chetler has more freestyle influence in its design. Softer flex pattern, more rise in the tail, easier edge release in the tail, but not as powerful or with as much vibration damping as the Maverick. Hope that helps answer your question!

[@michaelhuber3610]

@@SkiEssentials yes so freestyle, all mountain, and touring but I have a pair of bentchetler 100s and I would argue that they’re already a all mountain ski so 🤷‍♂️😂

[@StrUspeedy38racer]

How would these compare to the stance 102? Or even black crows justis?

[@pewpewpew8390]

I held both the stance 102 and justis at same time as 100 ti, the 100ti is way lighter, should be interesting though.

[@SkiEssentials]

Like pewpewpew said, probably the biggest difference is the weight. Much lighter than both of those skis. Rocker profile and overall shape feels different too. The Justis and Stance feel like they have more rocker. So, they're heavier and smeary, but not as quick or as agile as this ski, in my opinion.

[@curtislaketek2822]

How do these compare to QST 98s?

[@montel20000]

What kind of helmets are you guys rocking?

[@SkiEssentials]

I (Jeff) have a Sweet Protection Switcher. Bob wears a Bern helmet from a few years ago.

[@montel20000]

Thanks Jeff. Love the videos by the way, you have helped inform a few of my buying decisions keep up the good work friend.

[@SkiEssentials]

@@montel20000 Thanks Montel!

[@NickSloggett]

Are these the perfect split between the enforcers and the Black edition Ripsticks??!!

[@NickSloggett]

Obviously the 95 ti - but still?

[@SkiEssentials]

Could be the perfect split for somebody, yeah! That's kind of where it comes down to subjective performance and skiing style more than objective analysis, at least that's how I think of it. I think the most interesting part of that comparison is the Maverick has a longer turn radius than both of those skis, so it would kind of be over-simplifying things to just say it's a split between the two, there are some significant differences as well.

[@vicyu409]

whats the different between this one and bent shelter 100?

[@SkiEssentials]

Probably the biggest difference is the shape. The Bent Chetler is a twin tip, while the Maverick is a directional ski. There is some tail rocker, but it's not a twin tip like the BC 100. The next significant difference is construction. The Maverick uses some metal in its construction, which increases vibration damping and gives it a more powerful feel. So, in general, Bent Chetler will be more playful, while the Maverick will feel stronger and more precise from the flatter tail.

[@loug4626]

I am an Atomic fan to start off with for many years.....and after watching all your reviews I get the itch to buy another pair so the wife shudders each time I watch :-). Where does this ski performance / personality fit between the Atomic vantage CTi 100 and the Bent Chetler 100 (yes own them both in 188 cms)... along with 3 other pair of Atomics in quiver.. Again good review maybe I should become a tester for seniors !! to feed my curiosity....Thankyou.

[@SkiEssentials]

It's kind of like a Vantage 100 CTI but with some influence carried over from the Bent Chetler. It's far more stable at speed than the Bent Chetler in my opinion, but more playful and feels lighter on your feet than the Vantage 100 CTI...

[@loug4626]

@@SkiEssentials Thankyou and while all good in their own way of the 3 what would be your personal preference?

[@stephenkennedy3145]

Do you guys sell and ship to Canadians

[@SkiEssentials]

Yeah, we can ship to Canada.

[@matthewhull46]

What lengths will these skis be available in?

[@SkiEssentials]

172, 180, 188 cm in the 100 Ti. The narrower Mavericks get some shorter lengths as well.

[@alecholford8793]

I am 6ft 210 pounds and a solid intermediate skier ... should I get the 180 or the 188?

[@leolee6786]

Definitely go with the 180s. 188 is a lot of ski for your size.

[@poduss44]

I’m 5ft10 and I bought the 180’s because I felt the 172 is too short. Get the 180 especially if intermediate

[@Andernol]

Looking at the marketing and all, these look like a phase in replacement for the Bent Chetler 100's.

[@SkiEssentials]

From everything we've been told, the Bent Chetler is most certainly not going away.

[@dylanholshouser9969]

I'm torn between this ski and the BC100. I commented on that review, but have discovered this ski and don't know which one would be better for me. Like I said on that video, I ski bumps and a few groomers as well as powder and side hits. I currently don't do switch skiing, but might do that in the future. Can the Maverick do any switch skiing? I'm worried that I might overpower the BC100 on hard carves and at high speed. But at the same time I'm worried the Maverick would be too stiff for jumps. Thanks.

[@SkiEssentials]

I think you really spelled out some nice differences between the skis, and your hopeful application. You're going to make a sacrifice, you just have to decide what it is. Maverick does great in bumps, trees, groomers and powder, while BC 100 is great in bumps, trees, powder, and park. The groomer is where you're seeing the biggest difference. The Maverick is quite a bit better in this regard. I wouldn't worry so much about switch--the Maverick will do just fine for what you're looking to do.

[@RyGuyTheAVGuy]

Atomic doesn't even sell this ski on their website?

[@SkiEssentials]

It's new. They're probably limiting sales to select dealers, like us. I also know there's limited quantities of these skis right now, as usually happens with an early production run. They'll be more readily available come summer/fall.

[@bobbydraco2749]

Anyone use these skis in the backcountry touring? How do they fare?

[@SkiEssentials]

At under 2000 grams for a ski with two sheets of metal, the lightweight touring benefits are hard to ignore.

[@andrewt248]

Nope. I’m NON-STOP linking railroad tracks on groomers all day. 😂👍

[@CC-ys8qq]

Ski to me looks too big and clunky under your feet as compared to others you’ve skied on.

[@SkiEssentials]

I wonder if that's because of the turn radius. A lot of the skis we've been on lately have shorter turn radii, so can look more dynamic on a groomer, especially at slower/moderate speeds. They don't feel clunky on your feet, at least I don't think so!

[@neilmengel971]

: