2022 Yamaha JetBlaster WaveRunner: The Watercraft Journal, EP. 97

It's loose. It's squirrelly. It's a friggin' blast to ride. The Watercraft Journal gets to romp on the new 2022 Yamaha JetBlaster WaveRunner and gives you a detailed review of this little ripper! Don't miss the other HALF of our review exclusively HERE: watercraftjournal.com/gallery...
And please subscribe to our KZbin channel!
You can also follow us HERE:
Facebook: / thewatercraftjournal
Instagram: / pwcjournal
Twitter: / pwcjournal
And please visit our sponsors' websites:
Sea-Doo: www.sea-doo.com/
Slippery: slipperywetsuits.com/
Windrider: windrider.com/
GoPro: shop.gopro.com/
#pwcjournal #jetblaster #yamaha

[@adamsanchez7845]

Thank you for this review! I have been riding a 2018 GP 1800 for a while now and as much a I like it this really brings back that old school fun, I'm sold!

[@watercraftjournal]

Awesome!

[@caseywilson5812]

I love the throwback colors and graphics

[@watercraftjournal]

Very retro!

[@PotatoeJoe69]

Standard TR-1 is 90hp. The TR-1 HO, according to Yamaha, makes 13% more HP than the old MR1, which made 110. So that should put the TR-1 HO right at 125hp. I've got a 2023 Jetblaster on order. Already bought Riva Sponsons, ride plate, intake grate, impeller and exhaust.

[@2003SCT]

I have and currently ride a matching pair of Wave Blaster 2’s…this certainly seems like a better comparison than to that of a WB1. I would love a pair of WB2’s but the compromises forced us into the WB2s which we are still happy with. These could be a fitting replacement for sure.

[@watercraftjournal]

Great points!

[@matypeachy7049]

I still have my 95 Wave Blaster 701 cc which is still one of funniest ski's to ride , l was always jumping waves ! !

[@watercraftjournal]

Awesome!

[@dunebuggymike]

Hey Kevin, great review! I just ordered a new Jet Blaster this morning and I can't freaking wait to try this thing out. Quick question... there will be rare occasions when I want to do some non-freestyle riding, like towing a tube. I was considering getting a set of adjustable sponsons so that I could adjust the handling/stability on the fly, depending on what type or riding I want to do. Would that work? Or is this a really dumb idea? Thanks!

[@watercraftjournal]

Added traction will always help any ski. Think of it like performance tires for your car. Even a boring 4-door sedan will benefit from superior tires (depending upon the season and road conditions).

[@scouseaussie9288]

How does it compare with the outgoing EXR? I know the JetBlaster replaces it but is their any improvement or downgrade from the EXR to know about

[@watercraftjournal]

Both are “spiritually” different. Please see the article linked in the description.

[@Mluisgr81]

Just started watching your channel last month. Love the content and advice! Just put down a deposit on our first ever ski, a 2022 vx cruiser ho. I wanted the jet blaster, but the salesman talked us into the vx based on where we will be riding it and fact that I will have my gf with me often (mostly Connecticut river, but also adventure out into Long Island sound). What is your take on the vx cruiser ho? Should I leave it stock or eventually throw some mods on it? For the first year or 2 I’m thinking of just riding it and enjoying it. Thank you!

[@watercraftjournal]

That's awesome! The VX is a good choice!

[@chrisbechel1322]

@@watercraftjournal I'm a 100% Yamaha owner my whole life. I want to see a video of one doing it before I buy one. Talk is cheap.

[@ericmcclelland7151]

When the EXR came out you said it was the most fun you could have, would you say this is even more fun? To me it seems like EXR +trim +footwedges +90s style, so while I realise it's not the same, as you said on Sunday stream What does the EXR do better than the Jetblaster?

[@watercraftjournal]

The two are spiritually different. The EXR was really geared to be a small racer. The JetBlaster is trimmed differently (there's no true neutral - even neutral trim is up) and its taller steering neck and foot wedges change the rider's posture purposefully for freestyle tricks. The 'Blaster does this better than the EXR for sure.

[@jdlmon3]

I am trying to decide if I want to go with this or the VX cruiser. I currently have a 95 Wave Runner III and have been riding it since 95. Anything is an upgrade at this point. On one hand I like the the Jet blaster looks like I can continue to have fun that I have been enjoying for 26 years. On the other hand the VX cruiser HO looks like we'll more of a cruiser and maybe not as fun or the fun I am used to. I can see pros and cons to both.

[@watercraftjournal]

We'd lean hard on the VX Cruiser HO. Sure, it's nowhere as loose or playful, but you'll definitely rack up many more hours on the Cruiser.

[@SME5724]

2:55 Kevin don’t beach your ski !!! 😂😂😂

[@watercraftjournal]

It’s not mine. 😉

[@joesph9748]

This looks fun. Question: we live on a calm lake in Michigan, have a 2013 Yamaha FZS. Super stable, fast but boring. Considering a 2022 Superjet. But thinking maybe this Jetblaster might be an option. I have never had a stand up. My 16 year old son will also be riding. Want something fun - what would you suggest amongst these two options or other. We will be keeping the FZS.

[@watercraftjournal]

SuperJet SuperJet SuperJet...

[@scottd218]

I could take my '96 B1 and turn it hard at full speed (likely around 44mph), lean it all the way over and carve around slalom ski buoys. I see everyone testing this doing low speed turns, but I have yet to see if it can really carve like the 90's WaveBlaster. Can it?

[@watercraftjournal]

It won't nor can.

[@khalilkenouche2063]

Hi kevin.. thanks for the good content. U do great job. I Wonder if that thing is made for jumps and having fun. Why yamaha did not make it whit smc ? If really nanxcell 2 is terrible.

[@watercraftjournal]

Nano2 isn't terrible at all. The GP's both use it.

[@khalilkenouche2063]

@@watercraftjournal iam still waiting for my fx cruiser svho 2021. I will try to do all advices wich u gave me. Hope everything Will be OK whit this nanoxcel 2. 🙏🙏

[@loginpatrycjusza]

Hey Kevin I think you forgot about 2 out of 3 main changes... You mentioned the trim but nothing about the handlebars and the "footpegs" in the back. The audio could be better as well. You are probably the number one magazine / you tube channel, the go to place so to speak when it comes to everything PWC so I figured some constructive criticism wouldn't hurt 😁😉😅

[@watercraftjournal]

Please see the article linked in the description - he covers more of that in further detail.

[@carlinhearfield3586]

I have purchased one of these babies!! However a have one question if you are able to answer it, does the Jet Blaster have self draining footwells?? Just wondering how the water drains as it looks like the foot chocks will stop the foot wells from draining when the ski is in motion! Any feedback would be greatly appreciated!! PS, love your videos Kevin!!!

[@watercraftjournal]

No it does not. Thankfully, they're VERY shallow and won't fill up too badly.

[@77rockcity]

The motion removes the water, just add throttle

[@CaptorOfSin15]

That ski reminds me more of a Seadoo XP or similar two stroke than a Waveblaster.

[@watercraftjournal]

It's definitely bigger than the old B1.

[@Andy-Andeee]

Contemplating the Jetblaster or EX sport with Riva Stage 1 kit

[@watercraftjournal]

Sounds fun!

[@waylinvanhalen]

It's about time they go back to a more 90s design. The old polaris hulls were the most fun ..

[@watercraftjournal]

The demand (sadly) isn’t there.

[@patrickfearon7942]

I miss my old 97 SL780. Modded the crap out of that thing. I was 14 and taking GP1300 peoples money at the lake. They couldn’t believe I could beat them.

[@siyuanliu5451]

How often should spark plug be replaced? Sea doo manual says every two years but lots of people did that every year. Is that kind of waste your money?

[@watercraftjournal]

Most plugs can happily survive 2 years - it all depends on the hours racked up and the condition in which you maintain your PWC.

[@paullinkins8121]

Looks decent (especially with the weight kept down to 550 lbs), but it's not a WB1. How does the acceleration/throttle response compare to something like a 1995 Wave Blaster? I imagine even with the JB's 110 horsepower, the 63 HP 2 stroke and 340 lb WB1 is a whole lot more playful.

[@watercraftjournal]

The power-to-weight ratio is IDENTICAL (please see the article linked in the description).

[@paullinkins8121]

@@watercraftjournal Identical power to weight ratios do not mean identical performance. Hull, pump, trim, center of gravity, power curve, etc. can all be different.

[@watercraftjournal]

Yes, you’re right - that’s why we didn’t list any of those other attributes. 😏

[@bwyyy7306]

Speaking of 80’s,how did you get Fabio to test it?

[@watercraftjournal]

That was Yamaha's model. Definitely not our choice.

[@opossom1968]

Nice drift water-cycle. Watercycle is what the PCW should be named, they really are a motor cycle for the water. Watercycle.

[@watercraftjournal]

"Boatercycle?"

[@evanescobar6689]

This one or wait for the Seadoo Spark X?

[@watercraftjournal]

Well, it’s easy to tell if the ‘Blaster is real or not.

[@billy1084]

I’ll be getting one if they haven’t done nothing to the 23 model,Awsome videos 👍🏻

[@watercraftjournal]

It should be a direct carryover.

[@billy1084]

@@watercraftjournal I did hear you mention in your video the other day about that ,tbh doesn’t appear that I’d be able to take delivery of a 23 model till possibly beginning of August anyway here in the uk from what dealers are saying 😬 ,thanks for the update much appreciated 👍🏻

[@jonathantate6048]

Between this and the Seadoo Spark/Trixx, which is better for wave jumping?

[@watercraftjournal]

One is Polytec plastic and the other Nano2 fiberglass. There’s over a 100lbs. weight difference between these too.

[@jonathantate6048]

@@watercraftjournal So is that a roundabout way to say the Spark is better at wave jumping? :)

[@watercraftjournal]

Not at all. We’re just sharing facts to help you make an informed decision.

[@jonathantate6048]

@@watercraftjournal Are you not allowed to make comparisons at this point? Just wondering what you would recommend for that specific purpose. I know the facts, but haven't ridden both so was trying to get an informed opinion from someone who has

[@LS3ftw15]

@@jonathantate6048 It seems like comparison articles are frowned upon or downright not allowed by the PWC manufacturers if you want to get press/review access. In the automotive or motorcycle world there are all kinds of multi-model shoot outs and comparison tests directly pitting competing products against each other. From what I can find, this is absent in the PWC market. You can find direct specification/feature comparisons, but detailed comparison articles are with some subjective comparison by the reviewer are no where to be found. No shade against the Watercraft Journal, that just seems to be the way things work with PWCs.

[@jeffbryner5355]

We no that there is not a oem sit down as good as the waveblaster but how does it stack to the waveblaster 1 amd the seadont spark?

[@watercraftjournal]

We typically don't do shootouts, rather, we review each ski on their own merits.

[@jeffbryner5355]

@@watercraftjournal haha ya don't want to get talked smacked too by the fan boys you offend eh? Lol. Right on then 👌

[@watercraftjournal]

This sentence doesn't make any sense. We don't smack talk people. We review PWC.

[@77rockcity]

​@@watercraftjournalAll his sentences make no sense. #WeNo

[@jfrometa502]

Nice machine. Do you think is better than the sea doo trixx?

[@watercraftjournal]

Both are really fun for sure, and do things slightly different from each other.

[@crosisofborg5524]

@@watercraftjournal 😅 very noncommittal

[@peopleschampgarage7869]

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@funfun3015]

Aahhhh yes a sea doo spark trixx but reliable and durable and almost same price. Am sold

[@watercraftjournal]

BAM!

[@D3M0z]

I'm picking mine up tomorrow can't wait neighbor's not gonna be happy with 4 skis they complain about 3 now

[@scotttabak6755]

Hey Kevin serious question. What in the hell is a commodity surcharge seadoo is putting on their machines? Who in the F conjured that up?

[@watercraftjournal]

It's what they're using to tack on extra $$$ without raising the MSRP so drastically.

[@Spruikermania]

Sea Doo prices up 10% in Australia for 2022 models, Yamaha up 3% for 2022 models. Example, a Sea Doo Spark Trixx 3 up is now $13,669 and Yamaha Jet Blaster $13,399. Sea Doo getting greedy like Apple Inc ..

[@SnakeEyez3]

I can already see us Cubans down in Miami engine swapping this thing and reinforcing the hull somehow to drag race it into 150 mph😂

[@watercraftjournal]

Never say never with those guys!

[@BMJAUDI]

I still have my mint 1996 Yamaha Waveblaster 1 twin-carb. This new one seems like a couch compared to the original WB1. I wonder why they didn’t call it ‘Waveblaster’? You want tippy, get yourself a WB1. You cannot board the craft/sit on the seat without giving it gas for stability. Makes it a real challenge to ride. I refuse to sell that machine due to the sheer fun factor! This one looks pretty intriguing though

[@watercraftjournal]

Dude, that's rad!

[@MegHumper]

is the ride plate any different?

[@watercraftjournal]

Nope

[@LR-my2di]

Having been into these things since '95 (Wave Raider 1100), I love anything LIGHT and RETRO. However, I'm not interested at all in its "squirrely-gig" capabilities. No-where in our primarily Suwannee River riding to safely do this. So how 'bout just being something fun to just cruise down the river for a day? Esp. for my conservative young 115 lb. wife. Size-wise, it's perfect for her. I'll mostly stick with my Jim's-modded FZS 1800 SVHO. So, fuel efficiency -wise, any comparisons with the 2-up Spark?

[@watercraftjournal]

The Yamaha TR-1 is a stellar powerplant and like all the other Yamaha 4-strokes, very fuel efficient. The 'Blaster can easily serve double duty, both as a fun, playful toy and a one or two-up rider (obviously, it's not as cush as a VX or FX). Plenty of enthusiasts use their EX models for long distance rides, so it is doable for sure.

[@LR-my2di]

@@watercraftjournal Thanks for that short "review".

[@watercraftjournal]

LOL I hope it's less of a review and trying to be thorough enough to give a satisfactory answer. -K

[@LR-my2di]

@@watercraftjournal Succinct and to the basic points that I needed to consider from your own personal experience. Thanks ...

[@Kiper-dt1ch]

Yamaha jet blaster or BRP spark?

[@watercraftjournal]

Please see our video discussing both units.

[@walrus1]

Can it do water wheelies?

[@watercraftjournal]

What did the review say? Did you read the article?

[@rdgray169]

Should be smaller or should be faster. I’m sure it will still sell well to the homogeneous masses.

[@watercraftjournal]

An ECU reflash is just a call to RIVA away!

[@77rockcity]

Man, the 2024 yamaha blue is clean af. Pics & vids do not do it justice. I have no bias but it looks thrice great the machine of the '24 Trixx #eww 😮 After the styling change and colorways I quickly jumped and spent the extra coin on the Yama.

[@erics6031]

What kind of quick modifications could you do to get some more hp?

[@watercraftjournal]

MapTunerX

[@techfhw]

@@watercraftjournal will the MapTunerX void warranty?

[@Bonsai-Miata2020]

I saw in the video that the ski was beached? Im telling the teacher on you!

[@chrisbechel1322]

Can these things wheelie like a Trixx?

[@watercraftjournal]

What did the video say?

[@dougjwhalen]

Power to rate ratio?

[@watercraftjournal]

110HP to 549lbs. equals 0.2 hp/lb.

[@nicolashuffman4312]

I wonder why Yamaha didn't tune this engine to 125hp, like the same engine when it is fitted to some of the VX models. It looks like those are also running on 87 octane. More power is more fun, right? I bet I end up calling Riva.

[@watercraftjournal]

The exhaust system is a bit different between the two models.

[@falcon9158]

I wish they’d put the 1.8 ho in a ex haul

[@watercraftjournal]

180HP would be a lot for that little hull.

[@coreykonkin5917]

Mannnn. They were so close!!! Why wouldn’t they make it wheelie the Trixx!!? It would have been a home run if it could wheelie. Quicker than the Spark Trixx would have made me and a lot of buddies switch.

[@watercraftjournal]

Why? Wheelies are dumb.

[@coreykonkin5917]

@@watercraftjournal The most fun you can have in the water with your pants on!!! I love my Spark Trixx, but I’d rather go to Yamaha for the reliability and more power. But the water wheelies is one of the best things about the superjet, Trixx and other freestyle skis. Maybe you’re dumb?

[@DavidSanchez-qz2cm]

Wish Yamaha would of gone all black with a bit of green in it 🤔

[@29inch]

Needs 130hp, now you got my attention.

[@watercraftjournal]

Call RIVA. Easy solution.

[@Spruikermania]

Try it first and you will be surprised by the grunt and snappy acceleration from the TR1. I find it has more than enough power for freestyle and surf conditions. And if you do decide to call Riva be careful because the Riva air filter because it just won’t cut it in the surf.

[@hellrzzr932]

What’s top speed

[@watercraftjournal]

54mph

[@WeTryMotorsports]

Although I'm a huge proponent of new models; this is a direct competitor to the Spark Trixx with absolutely no mention of it. The only thing I have to ask is the following: did Yamaha put a hush order on you not to talk about Sea-Doo at all? At 4:30 you state that it's a take back to 1994 on the WaveBlaster - I don't believe this statement to be accurate and your watchers/readers aren't going to believe that it is a homage to the WaveBlaster. Coming from your readers/subscribers - we're not naïve and we look to you for the most honest opinion of it. Otherwise, the video review is fantastic and the visuals are stunning. That's just my 2 cents, thanks!

[@watercraftjournal]

I saw your video earlier this week and know your feelings on the matter. No, I did NOT say it was a "take back" but a "spiritual" homage to the B1. That's some very loose connective tissue. And yeah, Yamaha absolutely positively doesn't want me mentioning their competitors in our articles or videos (they also read the comments here too - hi guys!). So rather than name-dropping the Trixx, I reviewed the JetBlaster exactly on its own merits. Is it fun? You bet. Can you do exactly what is advertised? Yup. Personally, a true "WaveBlaster" would've been a 1-seater with the new SuperJet hull and powertrain, but I don't think Yamaha is bold enough to build such a ski. -K

[@WeTryMotorsports]

@@watercraftjournal Kevin, I definitely appreciate follow up and honesty. I agree with the video otherwise and would imagine the Jetblaster to be ultra-fun in its own right but it's not what Yamaha is trying to make it be - which I believe should have been stated (from an honesty prospective). I'm super happy to hear that we're on the same page when thinking the SuperJet hull/engine would make a perfect true homage, but I hope Yamaha understands what the public wants. Bold? Yes. Doable? Extremely. This is why Sea-Doo is running away with the market and Yamaha should see (besides some die-hards), this is a real threatening situation to their overall pwc market. After all, the Watercraft Journal is a news source to us - the public and we respect your reviews! I really dig the long-format videos because your honestly shows and what you really think comes out, which is amazing to hear. Again, my two cents. Can't wait to get one on the water myself but I feel like I'm going to be in a retirement home before a true WB1 reboot is seen lol

[@watercraftjournal]

Appreciated. Here's the rub: if you want to play with the rich kid's toys, you gotta play by the rich kid's rules. Often there's small ways to circumvent, which I often find but again, access to the OE's is the way this whole operation works. Without it I may be "freer" to vocalize in a more candid tone, but I wouldn't have the opportunities to ride the machines like I do (although, I have managed to sneak out that too). Back to the point: You're not going to see a 1-seater from Yamaha. The corporate culture is to always "play it safe" and a really rowdy 1-seater is well outside of the realm that Yamaha's lawyers are comfortable with. Could they build one? 100% Is there a demographic of people who would buy it? 1000% But going out on a limb isn't their style. They'll let Kawasaki build an X2 first (which isn't going to happen either). -K

[@hdyebhehshs944]

Umm Spark Trixx?

[@watercraftjournal]

Everybody wants to compete.

[@EricFB]

Nope. If you're going to do a ground up job for the new Superjet, then the iconic Waveblaster needs its own ground up model as well. Not an ex with bar risers and trim.

[@watercraftjournal]

Most commenters tend to agree this is more of a B2 than a B1.

[@EricFB]

@@watercraftjournal Thanks for the reply. I understand the b1 will never come back. What I would like to see is something like the B3 with a TR1 setup just like they did with this ex. Many people don’t know there was once a very short lived B3. At the time I understand why it wasn’t successful, however with modern power plants, electric trim and high demand for sporty/ small crafts I don’t think they’d be able to keep them in stock. People buy the spark because it’s short and light, not because it’s plastic and slow.

[@emack3492]

I never understood why people just wont round up to the next number like that $1 matters. Dealers and businesses, and advertisers kill me with this. JUST SAY $10,000

[@watercraftjournal]

Yeah, it’s a weird one.

[@joebob7291]

Your mind thinks its a better deal thats why you always see candy, pop and fruit labeled at 99 cents instead of 1 dollar

[@emack3492]

@@joebob7291 That is for slow, weak minded people. Anybody with an ounce of common sense knows better but ok, if you say so...

[@ericmcclelland7151]

I would've clicked this faster if I saw it earlier

[@watercraftjournal]

Please share it!

[@Sleddog215]

'Don't jump your watercraft. Wait What ??. Dude get off the lake and hit the surf..I have jumped my yamaha hundred of times. Never a problem.

[@watercraftjournal]

It’s literally written all over your ski and in the owner’s manual. It’s one of the primary causes for hull failure and powertrain damage. Plus, people get hurt. We gotta side with the lawyers on this one.

[@alexnutcasio936]

@@watercraftjournal seriously, it’s the most natural thing one can do on a pic.

[@MikeZ32TT]

But its $14,599 Canadian WTF is that pricing

[@MikeZ32TT]

A Seadoo spark trixx is $9,799

[@watercraftjournal]

Because BRP is a Canadian company it's not paying the same tariffs that Yamaha is. That and the CAN vs. USD exchange.

[@MikeZ32TT]

@@watercraftjournal I would love to know how many they sell in Canada. Thanks for the info.

[@Rockit181]

seems like the trixx does it better, idk

[@watercraftjournal]

Does what better?

[@chickenman1999ify]

Need to be shorter and get rid of the electronic trim with a finger trim lever

[@watercraftjournal]

Doubt that they'll shorten it.

[@jasonmekush5280]

I like my yamahas but that thing has nothing on a spark trix , sorry not close enough for competetion

[@watercraftjournal]

Depends on how you're planning to use it. We'd like to see a surf jumping/longevity competition.

[@IHadToMakeThisAccount]

The blaster did not return lol, doesn’t do the Original WaveBlaster Justice, it’s probably why Yamaha called it a different name.

[@watercraftjournal]

Again, it’s a spiritual homage, not a true carbon copy.

[@codyblade7872]

Why not buy the original wave blaster 1 hahah half the price half the size twice the fun and you can jump ocean waves all day long

[@watercraftjournal]

Find one for the same price, or a cheaper one that's not a basket case.

[@russellmarmon2847]

Jump it and loose your warranty when the nano eggshell hull splits in half.

[@watercraftjournal]

It won't. It's tougher than that. And considering its such a smaller craft, there's even less chance of stress cracking.

[@russellmarmon2847]

@@watercraftjournal I really do hope so for the sake of the hard earned cash purchase of the customers. Its not a myth that Yamaha has the weakest thinnest failure prone hull in the business.

[@Spruikermania]

Dude get off the lake and hit the surf. I do loads of wave jumping in the surf with nano excel 2 hull (2020 EXR) and the hull doesn’t miss a beat. Just don’t land flat on big air .. same goes with fibreglass and SMC

[@russellmarmon2847]

@@Spruikermania I been offshore racing for 22 years from Africa jet raids, Orleron in France many times I was part of the international offshore Factory Seadoo race team along with Cyril Lemoine and Franky Zapata, I have won World, European and National offshore race titles so please don't lecture me on riding lakes as I only have ridden world wide endurance sea races, I have seen multiple failures over two decades of Yamaha SMC and nano hull failures. Wave jumping a low powered light craft like an EXC you may get away with but serious long endurance races with 300hp + you will not for sure.

[@russellmarmon2847]

@@watercraftjournal my friend raced aquax with a brand new VX a couple years ago, hull cracked he didn't hit anything I was in the same race, later that year same thing happened same model cracked delaminated and he sank as well. Good luck.

[@ukusawright]

Hideous!

[@watercraftjournal]

Oh c'mon it's not that bad!

[@LS3ftw15]

It's pretty rad

[@alexnutcasio936]

@@watercraftjournal it’s pretty bad and who thought of those colours?

[@WaterDR-tw8re]

Who gives a crap what they call it???? Just focus on what it is and does!

[@anthonylatino9341]

This video is not one of your good ones we don’t see you do anything with it

[@watercraftjournal]

Kevin did donuts, jumped it and powerslid it. What more did you want?

[@SkiB84]

who the hell says don't jump your watercraft?!?!? go buy a boat!

[@watercraftjournal]

The manufacturers. Insurance companies. The USCG.

[@alexnutcasio936]

Trixx is better. Thousand le$$ , lighter , IBR, speakers too….. just a better trick machine.

[@watercraftjournal]

JetBlaster is also available with twin floating Bluetooth speakers.