16 MPG with such a small engine?! That's like V8 numbers
@devinthierault11 ай бұрын
It's a larger displacement 4 banger with a turbo. My guess is with a tune it would get way better milwag.
@dawsongranger494011 ай бұрын
Its a fat 2.7 4 cylinder, nothing small about that. Its also running like 27 psi of boost. Nothing small about that. Thing is probably chugging fuel at full throttle
@AgentSmith91111 ай бұрын
@@dawsongranger4940 If the fuel economy is awful, then what's the point? It's just gonna have bad reliability. Give me a 5.0 V8 instead.
@dawsongranger494011 ай бұрын
@@AgentSmith911 emissions for Chevy and torque. The 2.7 turbo has way more torque than the 5.0 and much lower down. Also the 2.7 can get better fuel economy when you’re not romping on it like these reviewers do. It has cylinder deactivation and can go down to 2 cylinders
@brq4411 ай бұрын
60k and 16 mpg for a 4 cylinder????
@JustPlaneChris11 ай бұрын
16mpg and nearly $60k for a 4 cylinder mid size truck? That is INSANITY.
@dawsongranger494011 ай бұрын
Not that insane when you factor in inflation, this is the top of the line luxury off road version of the truck. You can get regular colorados for like $35-45k, and the 2.7 is running an insane amount of boost and might as well be a v8