2023 International Mission to Mars: Engineering Design Competition - Putzig and Stoker

Speakers:
Than Putzig
Carol Stoker
This is part of the first week of lectures for the six-week International Mission to Mars: Engineering Design Competition.

[@jameswilksey]

These long videos have no description of the content. [competition]+[name] is not a description of the topic discussed. Lot of hours to wade through here. Sorry.

[@wikkid1show569]

I really don't know why start beyond our way of first getting their. The Orion project gave us a glimpse of Pulse detonation propulsion . The fueled Rocket is still the same since Wernher Von Braun introduced them to the world. Nothing much has changed , it is still copy and paste but people are really twisted when you look at the features. It's like going into a dealership and asking for the worst possible car with the world's worst mileage. Think against the backdrop of the vacuum of space and the distance covered is compared to a particle on a grain of sand. I'm willing to share to the world. An evolved model of what's needed for today and the future of space exploration. I feel Nuclear is not worth it until fusion is successful and feasible for all . The rocket system hasn't evolved since birth . Solid boosters came from the birth of the firestick aka the firecracker. I would want a craft and all of you should demand improvements because at 2 to 4 astronauts at a time , just doesn't make sense. As I mentioned earlier with Pulse detonation propulsion. I want to go hybrid because fuel and displacement equals much more distance. The improvement will gain speed just because it's going to give what the Orion project gave except it won't be bombs bursting in air/vacuum of space but internally and definitely not as much because the containment system would be much smaller and with my projection showing we can reach the moon which is 250,000 miles away in mere minutes. Hybrid system is what today should have. H.E.M.P which stands for Human Evolution Making Progress