3 Extinct Animals That We Could Bring Back To Life In The Next 10 Years

  Рет қаралды 24,018

Tsuki

Tsuki

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 207
@SimJan.
@SimJan. 2 ай бұрын
One of my biggest concerns about "de-extinction" is that in case this is achieved it will give an excuse to those who want to destroy nature since they will just have to say "we can bring them back later".
@ashash6866
@ashash6866 2 ай бұрын
Agreed, who's their to say that some drunk Bogan kills one for the sport or just sake of it then pull the "its the future, we can get em back like we just did" Card, If they do actually come back i hope the government or whoever Ups up Poaching laws and make it strict to whoever will hunt them If.
@thelittleal1212
@thelittleal1212 2 ай бұрын
That’s definitely a good that I’m concerned about
@MaskedMon
@MaskedMon 2 ай бұрын
The problem, bringing extinct animals back will likely cause the extinction of existing animals... Who do you prioritize? (Only one right answer)
@SimJan.
@SimJan. 2 ай бұрын
@@MaskedMon Obviously the ones who aren't extinct, since "de-extinction" will likely bring several new problems with it and let's be real, those animals are just replicas, not the real thing.
@Spnozilla
@Spnozilla 2 ай бұрын
So then why don’t we use the same technology for de-extinction to re-stabilize nearly extinct and endangered species? It’s clear some guy somewhere someday will authorize and carry out the de-extinction of some organism so might as well put it to better use on the organisms that we should be prioritizing before then.
@awesomeocelot7475
@awesomeocelot7475 2 ай бұрын
I’d say the thylacine is the best one to bring back as it’s been extinct less then 100 years (if at all) so it’s habitat and prey should mostly still be around enough that it won’t hurt the ecosystem.
@shanefernando2604
@shanefernando2604 2 ай бұрын
oh yeah there's definitely prey there .Ever since the thylacine became extinct(controversial),The amount of prey animals in tasmania and other places where thylacines were WAS WILDSPREAD.Without the thylacine as an apex predator,ecosystems are falling apart and more diseases are spreading...
@Qbliviens
@Qbliviens 2 ай бұрын
Yeah, especially because Australia and Tasmania do not have any large native land predators anymore (except Dingos, but these are not really native to begin with) so bringing back Thylacines would fill that niche again.
@shanefernando2604
@shanefernando2604 2 ай бұрын
@@Qbliviens definitely, the thylacine was the most recent HUGE loss we had..
@dariusbrock2351
@dariusbrock2351 2 ай бұрын
When the process is perfected, I'd like to see the return of the passenger 🐦 and the Carolina parakeet.
@TheMegAxolatl4836
@TheMegAxolatl4836 2 ай бұрын
As a person in the Appalachians I would not like to see my roof covered in pigeon shiq
@emmettkennedy8388
@emmettkennedy8388 2 ай бұрын
First can we get rid of the European starlings? They are so bad
@dariusbrock2351
@dariusbrock2351 2 ай бұрын
@@emmettkennedy8388 I've heard about how noisy they are. Aren't starlings an invasive species in the US? Grackles are another highly disruptive species I've heard about when introduced.
@emmettkennedy8388
@emmettkennedy8388 2 ай бұрын
@@dariusbrock2351 starlings are invasive
@GallowglassVT
@GallowglassVT 2 ай бұрын
I'm just waiting for all the people misquoting Jurassic Park by ignoring that Ian Malcolm is specifically talking about dinosaurs in that speech, and even says that there's a difference between bringing back animals killed off by human activity and ones killed off by natural causes. A bit of media literacy goes a looooong way, folks.
@1legend517
@1legend517 2 ай бұрын
Exactly. I'm so sick of all the fearmongering and the Jurassic park references and comparisons. It's like comparing apples and oranges.
@Dcdc425
@Dcdc425 2 ай бұрын
Life finds a way.
@Kristian-z7g
@Kristian-z7g 2 ай бұрын
It's more of the argument that we should focus on protecting the animals that are still alive rather than the ones that are already gone. However de-extinction can be useful for both. I think it all comes to ethics and if it's OK to play God - whether that be bringing a species back or wiping one out. Though the mammoth was wiped out probably mostly wiped by natural factors (such as climate change and habitat loss), and humans just came along and finished them off unfortunately
@GallowglassVT
@GallowglassVT 2 ай бұрын
@@Kristian-z7g we can do both.
@chasingcheetahs5017
@chasingcheetahs5017 2 ай бұрын
the context for Jurassic Park is different, as the dinosaurs were revived to be park attractions, not revived to be put back into the ecosystems.
@Ekergaard
@Ekergaard 2 ай бұрын
If starting in the other end. Sumatran rhino is the closest living relative to woolly rhino. But sumatra rhino - who I think has more hair than other rhinos - is extremely endangered. Perhaps we could find some billionaire who want woolly rhinos in his or hers menagerie. And they therefore will spend money like crazy saving the Sumatra rhino
@bizoitz86
@bizoitz86 2 ай бұрын
Hi 👋🏾. Have you ever mention the Aurochs. This was always interesting to me.
@BullyMaguire2007-1
@BullyMaguire2007-1 2 ай бұрын
Another excellent video! I really hope that they will bring back the Carolina Parakeet one day. It would be really nice to add a splash of color back into the US ecosystem.
@LeucisticBaryonyx
@LeucisticBaryonyx 2 ай бұрын
The thylacine is my favorite extinct mammal.
@TsukiCove
@TsukiCove 2 ай бұрын
i think i'd say the same too
@StarGiraffinum
@StarGiraffinum 2 ай бұрын
Same here. I genuinely hope they make a triumphant return.
@Ekergaard
@Ekergaard 2 ай бұрын
It's quite possible that thylacine was the first animal I read about in the subject of de extinction, back in the early 90s. I'm quite sure I read about if before Jurassic park, made the concept famous. Back then, I as a kid, would likely have guessed we should have thylacines recreated by 2024. Sure I think I understood it would be crazy difficult to do that, but 2024 was crazy far in the future.
@k.avilla8061
@k.avilla8061 2 ай бұрын
Mine is the Triceratops.
@StarGiraffinum
@StarGiraffinum 2 ай бұрын
@@k.avilla8061 That's not a mammal (or are you saying that as a joke?).
@thelittleal1212
@thelittleal1212 2 ай бұрын
Tho it’s uncertain if it’s possible, a set of creatures that I think would be great to bring back from extinction again, would be the creatures of New Caledonia, despite how prehistoric many of these creatures look, they have only been extinct for less than 10,000 years ago Seeing the ancestor of land crocodiles, smaller Gastornis like birds and ankylosaur like Tortoises would be so amazing see in person
@Kristian-z7g
@Kristian-z7g 2 ай бұрын
It would be so cool to see a living Mekosuchus climbing trees!
@samrizzardi2213
@samrizzardi2213 2 ай бұрын
I think the Sicilian wolf could be a candidate, if anyone took an interest in it
@johnkeviljr9625
@johnkeviljr9625 2 ай бұрын
Yes! Good call. Also, the Barbary Lion.
@nojorooney
@nojorooney 2 ай бұрын
@@johnkeviljr9625there are still Barbary lions, they are just extinct in the wild
@dmitriyalaasniy8442
@dmitriyalaasniy8442 Ай бұрын
@@johnkeviljr9625 Barbary lion is in fact just a population of Panthera leo leo, which include Western African and Asian Lions, its not a separate sub-species
@jasonphilips2751
@jasonphilips2751 2 ай бұрын
Very interesting video Tsuki. Keep them coming n greetings from NZ
@TsukiCove
@TsukiCove 2 ай бұрын
thanks for the support :)
@jennifersalt3194
@jennifersalt3194 2 ай бұрын
They introduced monkeys? Why? Rats seem to have been unwanted stowaways for most of history-hence the ship’s cat-and once permanent settlements were built-the farm cat (and maybe the house cat as well). Dogs are helpful to settlers in all sorts of ways. Monkeys are the opposite of helpful. And, they aren’t exactly unobtrusive, either.
@victory8928
@victory8928 2 ай бұрын
People found them to be funny like little children I suppose
@tessat338
@tessat338 2 ай бұрын
Birds cannot be cloned because the embryos are having the shell built around them way up inside the mother bird at the point that cloning would need to take place. Basically, they can be taken out but not put back in and have the chick survive. The sex organs of a more developed embryonic bird inside a laid egg can be changed. Then that altered bird has to survive, hatch, grow up and mate naturally with another altered bird to produce the genetically different offspring. It's simpler with mammals, whose embryos are physically more available for alteration and then later implantation.
@1legend517
@1legend517 2 ай бұрын
Yeah, I can see it being more difficult with birds and reptiles, given that they lay eggs which definitely complicates the process even more!
@tessat338
@tessat338 2 ай бұрын
@@1legend517 Beth Shapiro of Colossal Biosciences wrote a very accessible book called "How To Clone a Mammoth" that explains the processes much better than I can. I'm paraphrasing her explanation. Good audio book too.
@1legend517
@1legend517 2 ай бұрын
@@tessat338 Sounds interesting. I'd definitely read that. Always been fascinated by this subject.
@michaeldeak5727
@michaeldeak5727 2 ай бұрын
Dodos did not go extinct due to hunting. Several accounts say that they tasted terrible.
@brandonmaloney388
@brandonmaloney388 2 ай бұрын
I don't get a long lunch break but everyday at work is a long day, these videos come out at the perfect time every week and allow me to sit down detach from the crazy day for a few minutes and just relax, iam now appreciating another great upload😁❤️
@edi9892
@edi9892 2 ай бұрын
I just worry about who raises these animals... Many animals cannot survive on instinct alone...
@Gigi4u
@Gigi4u 2 ай бұрын
I don't think they would be releasing the first few brought back individuals in to the wild, it would be to risky. They would probably start releasing them once they have a hefty enough captive population as a fail safe.
@Paulu-lh2fh
@Paulu-lh2fh 2 ай бұрын
Amazing video like always ! , also I wanted to talk a little more about the Thylacine & colossal & marsupial mouse since where I live in France we had a documentary of the channel "Arte" talking about cloning creatures and they talk about thylacine ! so they have already a method for cloning it which is cleary a 300000IQ move so as people maybe know marsupail when they are born are REALLY SMALL its the same for each marsupial species... so their plan is in short got the marsupail mouse pregnant of a baby thylacine with clonage stuff let the baby thylacine born and when the baby is too big for the mouse they transfer the baby into a artificial pocket and take care of the Thylacine until he reach adulthood , also it confirms for sure if a day we have a mammoth cloned he will go into pleistocene park..... and no where else
@edmondantes4338
@edmondantes4338 2 ай бұрын
Technologically we're nowhere near doing this in the next 10 years. We can barely clone living animals with a very low success rate, and can't even do it with every species we attempted.
@devincharlvanvuuren6194
@devincharlvanvuuren6194 2 ай бұрын
Qwagga would probably be doable soon
@1legend517
@1legend517 2 ай бұрын
This is true. Cloning isn't a flawless process. They've struggled to clone a lot of things.
@shanefernando2604
@shanefernando2604 2 ай бұрын
at least we actually have a chance on reviving them..
@edmondantes4338
@edmondantes4338 2 ай бұрын
@@shanefernando2604 Sure, just not in the next 10 years.
@jawadplayz5988
@jawadplayz5988 Ай бұрын
​@@edmondantes4338the wolly mammoth will be a mix aka a hybrid
@PeterRuane-z9y
@PeterRuane-z9y 2 ай бұрын
Another great video from my favorite creator! Keep them coming.
@zm_headhunter
@zm_headhunter 2 ай бұрын
Can you do a video about successful de-extinction projects?
@ToucanPlayIt
@ToucanPlayIt 2 ай бұрын
I'm not AGAINST ressurecting extinct animals; I just think that it would be a waste of money bringing back something when there are already tens of thousands of other species out there RIGHT NOW fighting for a chance to live, with there only hope being human intervention. 1. Again, money would be wasted 2. We've already tried resurrecting some animals, but as Tsuki mentioned, they lived short lives with health issues. Why spend precious time and money on saving a poor animal that's just going to suffer and die super quickly? 2. We should be spending time and money on helping animals already in danger of dying out. idk just my personal opinion, but i feel like the cons just kind of outweight the pros
@GallowglassVT
@GallowglassVT 2 ай бұрын
thankfully, the tech being developed is being used to help modern endangered species as well.
@Jaynixx
@Jaynixx 2 ай бұрын
I think the pros outweight the cons as long as the animal doesn't have a bad impact on its old environment like an invasive species would. But if the animals been extinct since recent human history, then I think it would have a similar impact that its ancestor would have, right? I also don't think the usage of money counts as a con because many other causes for conservation exist, so why not experiment with de-extinction already? I am not trying to say "because there are already a lot of conservation efforts that exist, that we should start budgeting into other things instead", im saying we should be able to try new things without directly effecting how much money goes into conservation.
@1legend517
@1legend517 2 ай бұрын
Do you NOT think that there are people and organisations already doing that and spending huge amounts of money on those things right now? Science doesn't just focus on one thing - it's a whole branching of different things. That's like saying we shouldn't go to Mars because we should focus on finding cures for cancer. They are already.
@IAmStrad4
@IAmStrad4 2 ай бұрын
i feel like we should just clone some endangered species that are still alive today, no?
@1legend517
@1legend517 2 ай бұрын
@@ToucanPlayIt Like the girl in the taco commercial says "Why not both?"
@LeucisticBaryonyx
@LeucisticBaryonyx 2 ай бұрын
Great video
@johntodd3910
@johntodd3910 2 ай бұрын
I feel sorry for those animals Have you seen the ice age movies the dodo made famous in the franchise Here’s video request Ranking the largest animal herds and groups by continent Antarctica: emperor penguins Asia: Mongolian saiga antelope Europe: red deer South America: macaws Australia:emu North America: bison migration Africa: white bearded wildebeest
@edi9892
@edi9892 2 ай бұрын
Isn't it ironic to think who were the first to try to deextinct animals?
@JordanReifer-eg4nk
@JordanReifer-eg4nk 2 ай бұрын
Let’s go I’m a huge animal fan
@WailingWampusWerewolf
@WailingWampusWerewolf 2 ай бұрын
I knew we could bring extinct animals back to life. Thank you for making this video!
@CJM-rg5rt
@CJM-rg5rt 2 ай бұрын
It's so screwed up when farmers want some rare predator gone at whatever cost because it might eat their livestock. Fishers are incredibly creeping back into Ohio (mostly just parks and the few remaining forests in the Northeast) after being extinct here since the mid-1800's and they're freakin upset about it.
@JoshTrager-j9g
@JoshTrager-j9g 2 ай бұрын
It's one of the reasons I'm not too fond of farmers.
@stefangoedegebuur9249
@stefangoedegebuur9249 2 ай бұрын
We have the same with wolves in the netherlands
@JoshTrager-j9g
@JoshTrager-j9g 2 ай бұрын
@@stefangoedegebuur9249 I'm glad they're making a comeback!
@victory8928
@victory8928 2 ай бұрын
Of course they are, livestock is expensive and a lot of money plus they destroy the native habitat by bringing over foreign livestock who didn’t adapt to the area initially for livestock leading to massive destruction of habitat and prey options which in turns leads to increased hunting of livestock cause you are starving them of space and food. So farmers get upset because the system they use (we all use tbf cause we are kinda shit at managing land well unless we are seriously forced to due to not enough space e.g massive cities that already a take up massive areas). Honestly I wish farmers could bugger off on that or better yet we decrease our reliance on livestock animals and or raise more native species (though few species can be raised as such).
@JoshTrager-j9g
@JoshTrager-j9g 2 ай бұрын
@@victory8928 I just wish people would give up on eating beef (personally, even though I'm partial to my meat, I don't really like beef at all.)
@rowan6585
@rowan6585 Ай бұрын
Moa or Huai would be amazing and also very recent.
@johnparsons1573
@johnparsons1573 2 ай бұрын
It would be so amazing to bring back some of the animals we took off this planet. I'm all for it. Thanks for your awesome channel
@justinpelletier03
@justinpelletier03 2 ай бұрын
Any De-Extinction projects on the Barbary Lion?
@LifeIsGood12345-ILoveYou
@LifeIsGood12345-ILoveYou 2 ай бұрын
I'm a aboriginal Australian and i wanna pet Tasmanian tiger This beautiful marsupial is gonna De-extinct in 2030. I'm going to be 20 in this year
@myleswelnetz6700
@myleswelnetz6700 2 ай бұрын
If I did this, I would start with the species that went extinct the most recently, and then work my way backwards from there.
@RUBPROMAL
@RUBPROMAL 2 ай бұрын
Although I would love to see more elephant-like creatures in this world, I really have a lot of doubts about bringing Wooly mammoth (hybrids) back. If we will succeed, it will be most likely raised by elephants. And since Elephants are such social creatures, it will be more likely that the hybrid clones can't leave the herd in which it's raised (accept if it's a male of course). It would be cruel to break those familiar bonds
@AACB_Empire
@AACB_Empire 2 ай бұрын
11:07 Wow, the , mammoth mod for victoria 2 looks interesting
@competitionglen
@competitionglen 2 ай бұрын
You mentioned the numbat🎉 my favourite marsupial ❤
@Redneckkratos
@Redneckkratos 2 ай бұрын
13:46 I really wonder if Arnie is the last of his primordial species that has existed since then birth of the earth or if he has always been the Lord of planet earth
@myleswelnetz6700
@myleswelnetz6700 2 ай бұрын
Jurassic Park according to Michael Crichton and Steven Speilberg: had dinosaurs. Jurassic Park in real life: would have these animals and more instead.
@Xxggstuvpapa
@Xxggstuvpapa 2 ай бұрын
Could you do a video on all the different subspecies of lions
@GODZILLA2915
@GODZILLA2915 2 ай бұрын
While I know these companies can talk big and there is more to Chaos Theory than just ‘plot armored movie monsters’ but I say give it a shot. Though if I was running this, I say start off with an endangered species or subspecies first.
@oldsarj
@oldsarj 2 ай бұрын
Both the passenger pigeon and one species of New Zealand Moa are being worked on. The pigeon is closest as it has a extant relative in the band tailed pigeon. I expect to see them before I die. After all, I'm only 77.
@zm_headhunter
@zm_headhunter 2 ай бұрын
Here are animals i personally want back : 1)the atlas lion 2)the berbery leopard 3)the berbery bear boosting the population of the berbery deer 4) any animal that used to occupy the atlas mountains
@walksaselk40
@walksaselk40 2 ай бұрын
Resurrecting mammoths and turning them loose in the western united states would to a lot to prevent forest fires
@mickhack8034
@mickhack8034 2 ай бұрын
At this point we shouldnt think of could we but should we. They have gone extinct for a reason. Current day predators wouldnt know what to do with them, modern day herbivores would have to compete with animals they dont know how to deal with..
@CeratsTheCrunch
@CeratsTheCrunch 2 ай бұрын
I think that some should definetly stay extinct. Thylacines would be a good example of one that would be alright to revive. The wooly mammoth is where my mind shifts,It would be risky to introduce such a big animal like that on place where its been extinct for hundreds of thousands of years,You know,think of the local habitat,How would It react? Would the Native Animals adapt? Would the mammoths even survive? But yeah mammoths could Help agaisnt global warming. Could.
@nickrider5220
@nickrider5220 2 ай бұрын
Woolly mammoths, or a population survived until 4000 years ago in Russia, so not so long ago. The Thylacine went extinct quite recently and was entirely due to humans....we can't see beyond the end of our nose !
@1legend517
@1legend517 2 ай бұрын
No those modern day carnivores and herbivores will know how to deal with them because they evolved alongside those animals to begin with. That doesn't just go away overnight. Species adapt and change those species will find a way once again.
@walksaselk40
@walksaselk40 2 ай бұрын
birds probably can't be cloned without nanotechnology
@JoshTrager-j9g
@JoshTrager-j9g 2 ай бұрын
I wouldn't be too sure about that.
@walksaselk40
@walksaselk40 2 ай бұрын
@@JoshTrager-j9g it has something to do with the size of the egg cell
@olleikeowen8161
@olleikeowen8161 2 ай бұрын
The title of "de-extinction' is lowkey inaccurate because no matter how hard u try you'll only be making a species extremely similar to the original animal and not the actual animal itself, it's not possible to bring back a species that is completely extinct no matter the effort or thought put it unfortunately and that's just sad cause humans were the cause of destruction for these species
@d012k-n5t
@d012k-n5t 2 ай бұрын
Cool, I'm still going to be alive when this happens
@JR-ii6hq
@JR-ii6hq 2 ай бұрын
The dodo would prevent the extinction of those trees 😢
@myleswelnetz6700
@myleswelnetz6700 2 ай бұрын
Which extinct animal do you want to see?
@myleswelnetz6700
@myleswelnetz6700 2 ай бұрын
9:41 If I had a dollar for every KZbin video that says the same thing about Otodus megalodon, the biggest shark to have ever lived, I bet I could retire right now at age 21.
@BLUEXD21112
@BLUEXD21112 2 ай бұрын
Cool
@safron2442
@safron2442 2 ай бұрын
My main issue with all of this is that none of these organisms that will be created will be the original animal. They will just be Nicobar pigeons that look like dodos, dunnarts that look like thylacines, etc.
@jakewilson4679
@jakewilson4679 2 ай бұрын
We need a good scientific breakthrough, its been awhile since Dolly and I can't think of anything else non-tech related recently. 🤔 this is a very interesting video, thank you 👍😊✌️
@AncientWildTV
@AncientWildTV 2 ай бұрын
wow, this video is super informative and well put together! it’s fascinating to think about the possibility of bringing extinct animals back to life. however, i can’t help but wonder if we should really be messing with nature like that. isn’t there a risk we could disrupt current ecosystems or create more problems than we solve? just feels like a controversial idea to me. what do you all think?
@Dcdc425
@Dcdc425 2 ай бұрын
3:08 I see a Cowl (Cat Owl) 😅
@josephgoodlett4105
@josephgoodlett4105 2 ай бұрын
I’d like to see the Irish elk brought back but for hunting purposes once they reach a certain population size which would make them more valuable to protect
@elyzsabethahne2116
@elyzsabethahne2116 19 күн бұрын
Waiting is the HARDEST part!
@laurachapple6795
@laurachapple6795 2 ай бұрын
Let's use this technology to save the animals we've still got.
@Kristian-z7g
@Kristian-z7g 2 ай бұрын
Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn't stop to think if they should. - Ian Malcolm This argument can be made though isn't it also playing God to wipe out a entire species?
@RCSVirginia
@RCSVirginia 2 ай бұрын
@Kristian-z7g Through the whole movies series, I kept waiting for that annoying character to eaten by a carnivorous dinosaur. Sadly, it never happened.
@1legend517
@1legend517 2 ай бұрын
Someone always has to mention or quote Jurassic park 🙄
@JoshTrager-j9g
@JoshTrager-j9g 2 ай бұрын
You do realize there's a GIGANTIC difference between animals that lived 65 MILLION years ago, and animals that lived a couple THOUSAND years ago, right? Not to mention the dinosaur's extinction had nothing at all to do with humans, and the animals they're trying to bring back now are only gone BECAUSE of us humans. (As in, they were ARTIFICIALLY wiped out.)
@MatthewTheWanderer
@MatthewTheWanderer 2 ай бұрын
It seems like most of these wouldn't even be the same species genetically, just a hybrid that looks similar.
@brianandrea3249
@brianandrea3249 2 ай бұрын
Would love to see Thylacine returned (although I’m still optimistic that they are still somewhere in the very remote and wild Tasmanian wilderness). But I’d hate to think of them just being a zoo exhibit. With the lack of genetic variation in cloned specimens, I can’t see how they could be allowed back in to the wild.
@Richard-gy1pq
@Richard-gy1pq 2 ай бұрын
Funny that! Saw a Thylacine this morning. 🤔🤔🤔
@jaydendavis5047
@jaydendavis5047 2 ай бұрын
Hopefully they can bring back the Tasmanian tiger
@deanonessimo4052
@deanonessimo4052 Ай бұрын
I would think I'd like to see the return of the saber tooth cat, great auk, passenger pigeon, and one of the lost parrot species of America, the Carolina parakeet.
@A_Randomguy_
@A_Randomguy_ 2 ай бұрын
i dont think we should bring them back now tbh depending on how long ago cause things have changed too much from when the mammoths died however more recently extinct animals from dodos to tasmanian tiger i think that could work
@Parkerk234
@Parkerk234 2 ай бұрын
The one I want back the most is the Tasmanian tiger
@thehoundofthegamingvilles2012
@thehoundofthegamingvilles2012 2 ай бұрын
6 minutes gang
@RCSVirginia
@RCSVirginia 2 ай бұрын
Though I fully support this research as it will create knowledge and may succeed, methinks that it will probably take longer than the optimists who support it believe it will. Furthermore, this should not distract from the necessity of preserving endangered animals and their threatened habitats today. That should be a top priority. Both de-extinction and preservation can be pursued at the same time.
@JabbarMuhammad-f8j
@JabbarMuhammad-f8j 2 ай бұрын
I want all these animals to be brought back from Extinction
@StarGiraffinum
@StarGiraffinum 2 ай бұрын
Ironic that this was uploaded on the same day that Ice Age 6 was announced.
@kirstymay6297
@kirstymay6297 2 ай бұрын
Next time you make a video like this add the smilodon or saber toothed tiger
@fouraztecas6342
@fouraztecas6342 2 ай бұрын
You will need the ostrich of kiwi to be the knock off cuz the eggs of a chiclen or duck r too small
@josesalinasmorales5332
@josesalinasmorales5332 2 ай бұрын
Do what if East Africa pushed to Arabia.
@pjschmid2251
@pjschmid2251 2 ай бұрын
It seems odd to me that they go all the way back to the woolly mammoth for de-extinction, yet ignore recent extinctions like passenger pigeons and ivory billed woodpecker‘s that both have closely related species they could use to help with their efforts.
@JordanReifer-eg4nk
@JordanReifer-eg4nk 2 ай бұрын
I do
@Chompchompyerded
@Chompchompyerded 2 ай бұрын
Note that he's saying "dodo like" and "woolly mammoth like" and "thylacine like creatures". That means that the animal won't be the actual species. It will just be similar to the actual animal. For that reason, they aren't really bringing these animals back from extinction.
@arnaldorentes5371
@arnaldorentes5371 2 ай бұрын
Of course it's attractive, the resurrection of lost species. But the progressive loss of habitats is one of the biggest obstacles to the survival of wildlife, especially threatened species. I wonder what we can offer these "reborn" animals. A life in zoos?
@Ryodraco
@Ryodraco 2 ай бұрын
I don't know if we can say humans killed off the thylacine "quickly" after arriving in Tasmania. Europeans colonized Tasmania in 1803, so the thylacine persisted alongside them for well over a hundred years, quite a bit longer than a lot of other famous extinct animals (dodos became extinct in around half that time).
@Ryodraco
@Ryodraco 2 ай бұрын
I'll feel a lot more confident about de-extinction once it actually is accomplished with something that is not a subspecies of an existing animal. We really need to prove it can work at all before devoting too much to the many other questions which are moot if it can't even be done. Finding habitat is important, but it seems likely these animals would have to stay and breed in captivity for quite a few years before being released regardless. It would be too huge a risk to release the only ones produced.
@mikepotter5718
@mikepotter5718 2 ай бұрын
Maybe we should de-extinct common sense and answer some of the basic question first.
@DragonFae16
@DragonFae16 2 ай бұрын
Marsupials are currently impossible to de-extinct, and birds are very difficult. Marsupials because of their pouches, which we can't replicate. Birds because unlike with mammals we can't just take an egg cell, fertilize it and then place it back inside the mother. For birds, the only way to do it would be to have the complete gene sequence of the extinct species, find a similarly sized bird and use gene editing to change their gonads to produce the egg cells and sperm of the extinct species.
@aviancypress5181
@aviancypress5181 2 ай бұрын
Please re-upload your country breakdown videos where you list the fish species in Mexico, Australia etc🙏
@snowraptor-wc2kn
@snowraptor-wc2kn 2 ай бұрын
I'm exited for mammoths
@RamiRodriguezJr
@RamiRodriguezJr 2 ай бұрын
i really enjoyed this video, it’s fascinating to think about the potential of bringing extinct animals back to life. however, i can’t help but wonder if we should actually pursue this. we need to consider the ecological impact and whether these animals would even thrive in a world that’s changed so much since their extinction. what do you guys think?
@my_granny
@my_granny 2 ай бұрын
My pet stupid theory is that the effort to bring back the dodo is actually intended to, at least in part, create a domesticated dodo as a meat bird. Only a very limited number of them will be able to survive in what's left of their natural habitat, and while certainly some zoos will want them, how many will be able to afford them? especially if breeding them is controlled as highly as replanting gmo seeds. You know who would pay a lot of money, over and over again, for dodos? Rich people who want to eat them. First, there's the very obvious clout/bragging rights. A de-extincted creature is just about as exclusive a meat as you can get. Second, they probably would taste pretty good - squab has been a delicacy for millenia. What is squab? A pigeon young enough it hasn't ever flown, and thus hasn't gotten all stringy. What is a dodo? A giant pigeon that never flies. If the initial rich-people market provides enough cash-flow to establish a decent breeding population, the price could be slooowly dropped until it goes from "food for the richest of the rich" to "nice poultry for holidays and special occasions".
@andrewsmallacombe9468
@andrewsmallacombe9468 2 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, de-extinction would result in close copies, not a pure version of the species itself.
@Chompchompyerded
@Chompchompyerded 2 ай бұрын
I would love to see a live dodo before I die. They will have to hurry though. I'm getting old, and I'm not in good health.
@joshbradley5706
@joshbradley5706 2 ай бұрын
13:53 And people want to see the dinosaur come back
@roryoneill9444
@roryoneill9444 2 ай бұрын
It is probably better to use clonal gametes level (sperm and egg) for various Ibex subspecies using the Iberian Ibex as a root. The same can be used for the European Bison and Auroch for regional and genetic variation..
@marcelomelo9977
@marcelomelo9977 2 ай бұрын
The biggest problem is that even if we manage to save these animals the extremely poor genetic pool they have would make their populations prone to diseases, deadly recessive genes and imbreeding, eventually leading to their extinction. We don't even have the complete DNA of a single individual how they expect a community to actually thrive with only this?
@kagehikari4281
@kagehikari4281 2 ай бұрын
As much as id absolutely love to see the tiger back and others... History shows again and again, how nature points out the folly of man...
@kagehikari4281
@kagehikari4281 2 ай бұрын
Go go Godzilla!
@AdamWingard_Official
@AdamWingard_Official 2 ай бұрын
Should try to de extinct crocodylus thorbjarnarsoni
@trevorstevenson4038
@trevorstevenson4038 2 ай бұрын
Never going to happen. Not now, not ever, never.
@erikmurray3661
@erikmurray3661 2 ай бұрын
Bring back the Barbary Lion.
@Prehistoriclife487
@Prehistoriclife487 2 ай бұрын
Pied raven New Zealand quail Cave bear
@shanefernando2604
@shanefernando2604 2 ай бұрын
Finally there are people who are NOT discussing on bringing back dinosaurs and try to bring back mammoths and thylacines who actually HAS A CHANCE OF BEING REVIVED. So stop worrying about bringing back dinosaurs because I can tell you the chances of bringing back dinosaurs are 0%
@Gigi4u
@Gigi4u 2 ай бұрын
Yea the chickennosaurus project will not bring back a true nonavian dinosaur, it will just make a avian dinosaur with a nonavian raptor dinosaurs body plan. Still find it interesting but true deextinction should be prioritized over it.
@Mister-Wabbit
@Mister-Wabbit 2 ай бұрын
Will they try to bring back the Homotherium?
@An_Ian
@An_Ian 2 ай бұрын
THE DODO IS BACK WE CAN EAT IT AGAIN!!!
@RitoReyes2033
@RitoReyes2033 2 ай бұрын
Bring back the meg 😅
@missyrose2154
@missyrose2154 2 ай бұрын
Listen so even they pull this off and that is a BIG if it will never be that animal again it will be a hybrid because they have to use a modern animal to grow the baby . A hybrid would be interesting but it’s not the actual being that went extinct
@grine6966
@grine6966 2 ай бұрын
Yes, yes and yes! Especially the dodo, I would love to be able eat... hmm I mean to see them for real!
Why Resurrecting Extinct Animals Is Actually A GREAT Idea
16:45
Joe Scott
Рет қаралды 455 М.
Ful Video ☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻
1:01
Arkeolog
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
-5+3은 뭔가요? 📚 #shorts
0:19
5 분 Tricks
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Жездуха 42-серия
29:26
Million Show
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН
3 Invasive Species That Will Never Be Controlled
10:48
Tsuki
Рет қаралды 139 М.
5 Most Dangerous Places To Swim
16:17
Tsuki
Рет қаралды 250 М.
Incredible 4K Nature Scenes Narrated By David Attenborough | BBC Earth
3:58:42
Every Time Things Have Evolved Into Moles
27:16
Ben G Thomas
Рет қаралды 664 М.
The Story Behind Australia's Weird Animals
19:22
Moth Light Media
Рет қаралды 429 М.
7 Extinct Animals That Could Actually Come Back
25:28
Forrest Galante
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
How to Bring an Extinct Animal Back to Life
17:42
Real Science
Рет қаралды 737 М.
Ful Video ☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻
1:01
Arkeolog
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН