Fighter Pilot Banks Too Hard

[@Timmycoo]

That RCMP landing without nosegear looked perfect.

[@youpeopleareallinsane]

Came to the comments to see if anyone else was thinking that! Almost like it didn't matter at all. Them Mounties =P

[@GalootWrangler]

“The Mounties always get their land.”

[@ariochiv]

It was clever to stop the engine to minimize damage to and from the prop.

[@Timmycoo]

@@ariochiv Ya I've seen it from a cockpit POV before, landing without the nosegear and it was the exact same sequence.

[@UncleKennysPlace]

The "only minor damage" went well into six figures.

[@timriglar4502]

Too hard for what? Wings stayed on didn't they?

[@fluchterschoen]

I can only assume they fell off soon after.

[@timriglar4502]

@@fluchterschoen Should have saved the title for that part of the video then!

[@dougaltolan3017]

Cocktail spilt.

[@donaldwayne4219]

Too true

[@rtbrtb_dutchy4183]

@@fluchterschoennope, my guess, wings stayed on, built for that. I think the landing gear snapped off and the airplane is still in the air right now.

[@hbl142]

That Piper Cub footage was impressive

[@b1lleman]

Yes indeed but to me it looked like FlightSimulator 2024 . But that's my brain playing tricks on me I guess ;-)

[@TheBierp]

This is what happens when you combine a photo geek with a flying geek. Gorgeous.

[@emmanuelgeorge]

Looks like top gun

[@genemiller4953]

It definitely was not a sim…. It was Joe Costanza flying his J3.

[@AnthonyMartinez]

It’s @Bananasssssssss doing what he does.

[@dewayneblue1834]

F-15 pilots are born to bank hard. Really, really hard.

[@deanmccormick8070]

Nose didn't drop, so it must not have been excessive bank.

[@synchc]

@@deanmccormick8070 Yeah. I think OP likes to give F-15 pilots a rough ride.

[@hanskessock3941]

Wasn't even in burner (at least at the point we could tell) :)

[@edsalinas9996]

That's what she said!

[@williams9071]

​@edsalinas9996 hey look! We have that dude that uses that phrase when it doesn't really work! Lol😂

[@petersp63]

The last one with the mist Brilliant!

[@SneakyThew]

So cool.

[@cinthianardelli4874]

Nearly poetic (sp ?), the vortexes looked likes fairies bowing to their Lord.

[@MM22966]

I bet that pilot framed a shot of that to hang on his wall at home.

[@hilman94]

@@MM22966 i can imagine the conversation "hey, look there's mist... wanna shoot something cool?" 🤣

[@illuminate4]

its so calming

[@johnandrews3568]

The F15 shot was from the London, Ontario air show recently. The Red Arrows were also there.

[@billb7876]

Keep the red arrows they are a pain in the arse

[@synchc]

@@billb7876 Why?

[@lenynaise]

@@billb7876most invalid opinion here

[@pete1927]

Because he is a Blue Angel and can’t achieve their skill level…… let the across the pond debate commence 😂

[@andymanaus1077]

Ah, aviation. A world where "only minor damage" will set you back up to $100K.

[@rharbarenko]

and several weeks in the hanger.

[@ninjalectualx]

You mean at least $100k, not "up to"

[@andymanaus1077]

@@ninjalectualx Depending upon the aircraft in question, yes.

[@oldmech619]

Good news, the props were not turning. The bad new, the props need replacing for sure. The engine would still need to be pulled for inspection. At least $100k and up from there.

[@irw4350]

you get that privilege with a Ferrari also = £126/hour workshop rates

[@fluchterschoen]

*How they can get a horse into the cockpit* of that RCMP PC-12, let alone train horses to fly, is quite incredible. I suppose maybe it was a pony. Anyway, I'm so relieved to hear it wasn't injured - poor thing must have been terrified. Regarding the Iberia A330 that rejected its take-off: what do they do in that situation? It reminds me of when a gymnast stops in their run-up to a vault. I guess the pilots reassure the plane in the same way the coach reassures a gymnast - they stress that it's what they've trained for...they've done it hundreds of times...offer them a glass of water, then send them out to try again?

[@joeyjamison5772]

Horse-fly.

[@rjbennett3418]

​@@joeyjamison5772 Very nice job.

[@cedarwaxwing3509]

I was dumbfounded about your horse comment until the “RCMP” sunk into my sleep addled brain, then I pretty much choked on my coffee with laughter. Thank you for some great wake-up laughter! Ditto the Iberia Airbus … although that one is a little more subtle. I was thinking along the lines of “perhaps someone should explain to the pilots concepts like throttles, thrust, minimum takeoff speed, V-2, rotation, etc.,” but given Airbus products’ propensity to do what THEY want to do - regardless of pilot input - yours is the better comment. Thanks again for the humor!

[@fluchterschoen]

@@cedarwaxwing3509 heehee - thanks for your reply and I'm glad you enjoyed the laughs! When the notification popped up I just saw the first few words "dumbfounded about horse comment" and my first thought was, "oh here - this should be good".... I kind of expected it was going to be a rational explanation of why a horse couldn't possibly fit in a cockpit or be licensed to fly a plane. My absurd humour often gets met with rational contradiction! Anyway, thanks again!

[@frmcf]

I banked too hard when I was a teenager. Almost went blind.

[@polecat7355]

I take it that was auto correct and you meant to start with a "w"?

[@Nilguiri]

​@@polecat7355 Thanks, Captain Obvious.

[@ninjalectualx]

Wasn't obvious to me 🤷‍♂️ I guess I'm not teenage enough

[@deldridg]

"Son, stop that or you'll go blind." "Dad - I'm over here"

[@joeyjamison5772]

Can I do it until I just need glasses???

[@bubbazanetti3463]

Thanks for the J-3

[@nicolaslessard6073]

You owe us 18 seconds more of aviation because the F-15 video was already in last week's 3 mins video.

[@b1lleman]

You can never have too many of F-15 video's ;-)

[@davidf6326]

Yep, and the title had a less sensationalist spin on it last time.

[@davidf6326]

@@b1lleman You can if they're the exact same video.

[@fluchterschoen]

I knew I'd seen it before. I actually thought I'd been cheating on 3MOA with another avgeek channel, and I was feeling pretty disgusted with myself.

[@b1lleman]

@@davidf6326 yeah maybe, it saw it twice now and I'm not bored yet. To each his own, all the best to you.

[@NeonVisual]

An Aerosucre takeoff.

[@gaminglegofan]

2:18 MSFS2020 or real life? 😂

[@justaguy5770]

I vote flight sim

[@oldmech619]

The video is absolutely real. I have seen it many times in aviation.

[@Cantdecidemynamesohereisit]

It looks too perfect 😭

[@JemimaPuddleduck777]

Excellent video as always. Thank you..

[@feynthefallen]

They were smart and turned the ignition off before the prop hit. So many gear up landings the prop is still spinning, not only destroying the prop (completely unnecessarily in a 2-bladed prop), but also potentially sending bits of prop flying hundreds of meters in all directions. Why leave the motor on? You gonna taxi sliding on your butt or what? You're going to crash-land whatever you do, so there's not much point to "being ready to do a go-around" either.

[@paulcantrell01451]

The prop isn't really the issue... It's the sudden stoppage on the engine that gets expensive... But that's still cheaper than losing the airframe because you were dicking around instead of concentrating on the landing...

[@ninjalectualx]

The prop was actually still spinning. It looked off-ish due to the wagon wheel effect but you can see the sudden stop when it hits the pavement

[@rtbrtb_dutchy4183]

@@paulcantrell01451you are correct. Except, this is a turbine engine and the prop is not directly driven by the engine and is freewheeling. So there won’t be a sudden stoppage of the engine.

[@davebowman6497]

​@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 Agree that the compressor+turbine combo would not stop abruptly, but what about the other turbine that drives the prop? Since there's a gearbox somewhere in between that turbine and the prop, that gearbox would experience the prop axle stopping while the turbine is still putting angular momentum on its axle going into the gearbox?

[@feynthefallen]

@@ninjalectualx No it wasn't. It was feathered and all but stationary, as evidenced by the fact that both lower blades are pushed outward and the upper blades are completely unblemished. Observe closely and put your head in gear before you run your mouth, mate. Saves you embarrassment.

[@jmWhyMe]

The Eagle did NOT bank too hard! Stop with the hyperbole! And if you leave Newfoundland out, the Newfies get very insulted!

[@ninjalectualx]

Your comment is too angry

[@rhysplant8392]

Yeah why be hyperbolic when you can be parabolic.

[@Jezusbeznogi]

Previous episodes' titles: Pilot banks too steeply. Pilot banks too steep. Today's episode: Pilot banks too hard. A future episode: Pilot banks too hardly. None of which was true, by the way :)

[@RUBBER_BULLET]

I'm no aviator, but is it even possible to 'bank too hard?'

[@Jezusbeznogi]

​@@RUBBER_BULLET Yes, as long as it serves its purpose of making people click on the film :)

[@CerberusTenshi]

​@@RUBBER_BULLET Yes, it is possible, but no pilot would willingly do so. It also depends on the airplane and what safety features it has. Most modern civilian airplanes won't let you bank further than a set degree. So unless you shut that safety off, at least in civial aircraft, you can't. But military jets as well as aerobatic aircraft don't have that feature so technically, you could bank them too hard.

[@jens-joachimvonbandemer1981]

@@CerberusTenshionly true for Airbus, but not Boeing

[@dougaltolan3017]

​@@RUBBER_BULLETyup.. Telltale signs of banking too hard are... Not pointing the direction you wanted to. Wings falling off. Cocktails slopping out of the glass.

[@Bill_N_ATX]

That f-15 turn wasn’t too low. I used to work at the Jacksonville airport in the 90s when the Florida Air National Guard used F-16s for air interdiction. It was their jobs to meet Russian Bear bombers and such that were transiting down the coast to Cuba. So they’d get an alert and come screaming out of their secure area and down the shared runway. They’d be going in full afterburner down the runway, and just as they got good speed, roll to port about 100 feet up and fly right over the cargo ramp where I worked. Nothing like the feel and sound of their P&W F100 engine in afterburner. You first heard it, then felt it, then heard it again. It made you thankful that it was policy to wear hearing protection whenever you were on the ramp, even if you weren’t working an aircraft. But boy weren’t they awesome birds. You could see the pilot and even had one nod at me as he went flying by. **edited to make it meet, not meat. Doh!

[@ninjalectualx]

1. There are no Tuploev bombers this low 2. This wasn't 100 feet, this was like 15

[@lenynaise]

@@ninjalectualxmore like at least 40

[@rtbrtb_dutchy4183]

@@ninjalectualxthat was much higher than 15 feet. 😂

[@TrashyMan]

Your titles are becoming increasingly annoying. All the last titles are somewhat "clickbaitey", I am no longer watching the newer videos because of that. I suggest you look at the stats and make some tests to see if it is really bumping your views up (longer term). Hope you can return to what it was, or similar. This video could have been called "Fighter pilot banks hard" instead...

[@egpx]

The titles have been clickbaitey from the start. Apparently creators are encouraged to make the titles that way by KZbin so it's understandable why they do. I agree it's very annoying though.

[@Roddy556]

​@egpx I just report the videos as misleading

[@jeanaprewitt9658]

I'm tempted to report this channel for its' titles. When it comes to "too" anything in flight, it ends in disaster. If a plane flies too low or turns too sharp or ascends too fast, very very poor outcome. "Too" is not interchangeable with "high performance."

[@michaelsteiger8509]

Banks to hard? How hard was the pilot suppose to bank? Please stop ruining good airplane videos with absolutely stupid titles…. It lowers the quality..

[@Nilguiri]

"Too" Hard? You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

[@chrismaggio7879]

Stupid title... false and misleading.

[@rdspam]

And nothing new.

[@Roddy556]

Report it to youtube

[@HH-mw4sq]

There is no such thing as banking too hard when your thrust-to-weight ratio is greater than 1.

[@tokencivilian8507]

Quite artistic shots of the Piper. Very nice. And kudos to the RCMP pilot for setting it down in what appeared to be a textbook landing with a stuck nose gear.

[@yasemindemirci1343]

I can't be the only one who thinks the last clip looks INSANELY similar to MSFS 2024, or am i?

[@PurelyPog]

It actually does though

[@frankmcgee3213]

You’re not. It’s FS

[@PurelyPog]

@@frankmcgee3213 nah it isn't look at the original video, he said he shot it with a 600m lens and you see way too much detail in the grass and trees for it to be flight sim

[@kwikbit]

Weird, I was sort of thinking this, but not quite in the same way ... I thought that the takeoff field looked exactly like a Bush Trip airfield that I landed/took off in - guess we're still both saying how good the FS scenery can be these days 🤓. I found the last clip very relaxing....🧘‍♂

[@lenynaise]

@@frankmcgee3213no it’s real life

[@stevenborham1584]

1:25 Just Wow. All in a severe gale by the looks of it. I have never seen such a strange coincidence of bad circumstances create such a perfect outcome, didn't even bend the prop.

[@HolySoliDeoGloria]

So, the F-15 exceeded its bank angle limit? Because that's what "too" means.

[@chrisschack9716]

That would be a neat trick considering it can fly inverted. I'm sure that banking climb was multiple Gs, though.

[@soaringvulture]

@@chrisschack9716 Yep. Probably drained all the blood out of the pilot's head. Makes it hard to fly until it comes back.

[@user_747]

0:53 did that plane just do a vertical take off?

[@CerberusTenshi]

No, it didn't. It's just the camera angle and perspective that makes it look steeper than it is. Plus, there are only 2 airplanes that do vertical take-offs. The F-35B and the AV-8B Harrier. Vertical take-off is what helicopters do. What you might think about is vertical climb. Fighter jets can do that, when the nose points upwards in 90°. But commercial airplanes are limited in their climb rate and angle or they would stall. Not to mention, the passengers would get quite sick.

[@nootnewt]

​@@CerberusTenshi787 can get pretty dang close without a payload

[@101wildgoose]

All take-offs are vertical

[@kge420]

@@101wildgooseThey’re not vertical until Maverick says they’re vertical.

[@TheShowblox]

You probably should have said “Banks Too Low”

[@rdspam]

Probably “banks just as the pilot intended, according to the air show demonstration plan”.

[@TheCloudhopper]

That JAL 777 GA was not caused by the bounce. You can basically hear the "Wind Shear, Wind Shear" Master Caution going off in the cockpit from here. The GA was already in progress when the bounce happened. Those GEs take a few seconds to spool up.

[@rharbarenko]

agree! That poor plane was getting BEAT UP. Even his climb out was harry.

[@karhukivi]

Wind shear causes a rapid descent on approach. When the aircraft touches down wind shear is no longer an issue.

[@rtbrtb_dutchy4183]

@@rharbarenkonope.

[@rtbrtb_dutchy4183]

This was not a windshear at all. So no, no windshear caution going off. This was a classic case of pilot induced oscillation. It’s pretty obvious if you watch the elevators.

[@karhukivi]

@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 I agree totally. I was responding to the original comment by Cloudhopper who says he could "hear" the windshear alert!!

[@thespatch]

3 Minutes of Aviation Caption Rule: Add "too" just before the adverb. "Banks hard" becomes "Banks too hard," etc.

[@MisterItchy]

Because he stopped the engine, the propellors took the weight of the front end and the only damage was probably to the prop!

[@KevinW3278]

The second one of the Japan Airlines is crazy. That is one bad attempt to land. @0:32

[@somethingclever1234]

SH! Eagle guy, Fighters are made to turn and burn, not fly like an airliner

[@PhilWilliam-hx6xh]

Banks too hard = Pilot flying within parameters and flight plan.

[@the_bloke_that_cuts_the_grass]

Piper Cub was very very nice

[@RichardShelton]

A fighter pilot banking too hard? Really?

[@ApoJake13]

I was in an airliner, going for takeoff down the runway, when all of the sudden, we were all lurched forward in our seats! Turns out the pilot received an alarm and made a split-decision to abort the takeoff. We then had to sit for several hours to allow the engines (brakes?) to cool and check on the alarm before we took off. We ended up taking off on the same plane, and I guess the alarm was something minor (pilot never really specified) but needless to say we were all pretty tense during that second takeoff, lol.

[@SkyWatchAviation]

And that piper departure was amazing with the vortices

[@CaptainRonAhoy]

JAL had a completely salvageable landing there.....

[@rtbrtb_dutchy4183]

……..if it wasn’t for the PIO

[@ghostrider-be9ek]

1:35 - that is NOT minor damage, all prop strikes = 1/2 million dollar engine AND gearbox teardown - get your facts right

[@Rif_Leman]

You need to get your facts straight. The prop on that aircraft is not connected to the engine.

[@erwh1]

The pilots switched off the engine and the prop had actually stopped rotating at the moment of impact. Maybe the rules stipulate it, but an engine teardown would really be overkill since it was not stressed.

[@ghostrider-be9ek]

@@Rif_Leman "The prop on that aircraft is not connected to the engine." PT6 mechanic here - please tell me how the prop is being driven if its not connected to the PT6 power section? Are people really this dense?

[@ghostrider-be9ek]

@@erwh1 it makes no difference, the inspection process still has to be done - but perhaps the mandated replacement parts list is shorter. This may not be specified in the MM ; could be a call to PWC AOG tech team. I just hope this engine was at least close to TBO, and not just out of OH.

[@erwh1]

@@ghostrider-be9ek what he means is that since it has a 2 shaft design the prop is only connected to the gearbox and power turbine and not directly to the engine core. So like you say probably a gearbox teardown and inspection due to the lateral prop impact, but if the engine core just came out of maintenance I really see no reason to touch a perfectly good core. But maybe there is no other way on a PT6?

[@2373stevieb]

Thought the Piper Cub footage was a flight sim for a moment. Didn’t look real.

[@ariedrevel5111]

If the bank was too hard, he'd end up in the grass, but he kept climbing , so all goody.

[@dominicdahlheimer6861]

AWESOME vortices from the Cub! CAUTION WAKE TURBULENCE!

[@michaelpoyer]

Tried to oversell the F15 segment a little, I’d say. Seen worse.

[@mbvoelker8448]

Bounce? Narita? Yeah, go around. Absolutely.

[@pete1927]

Flies like what fighter pilots are trained to fly?

[@EverythingWindsor-EssexCounty]

Hello , I would appreciate if everyone check out the full video of the first clip. The link is in the description. I didn’t think it was too hard at all it was so awesome to see. Thank you

[@leziggystardust]

My comment is too exciting.

[@bradleygdyjh2]

1:20 WOW that is a GOOD pilot

[@honeysuckle754]

0:17 When fighter pilot bank too hard and should have credit union 💀

[@GlutenEruption]

Lmao. That's such a dad joke it deserves way more likes

[@LucidDreamer54321]

How was that "too hard"?

[@Daimo83]

"Noise abatement procedure" said the F-15 pilot winking profusely

[@CessnaAviation]

Imagine if the F-15 pilot intentionally did it since they saw the people recording waiting for him to take off 💀

[@CaptainDarkFighter]

Maverick

[@momentsofsanity]

He likely did. This was during departure day after the London Ontario air show. They usually put on a bit of a show as they leave.

[@rtbrtb_dutchy4183]

It’s always intentional. Unless you think that pilots close their eyes and let things happen accidentally. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@rdspam]

At an air show? Pretty good chance I’dsay. Pretty unlikely it was unintentional. Ooops, I pulled 8 g’s again….

[@princesscadance197]

That third one hurt to watch. When I realized that was a prop, and not a turbofan with cowlings concealing the blades, I tensed up...

[@cg9952]

He banked just fine

[@philhawley1219]

In that first clip a Buccaneer would have flown beneath the F 15!

[@fosstera]

that PC-12 landing was absolutely flawless, and evidently conducted by a skilled, steady minded (and handed) pilot. Saved themself, any passengers, the aircraft, and the runway. Marvelous

[@andrewday3206]

777-300ER Sure had an impressive climb being so light from low fuel!

[@CVSiN]

WTF are you talking about banks too hard, guessing you never spent much time with Aviation Units in the military. this is just another day when we deployed.. this is totally within the performance envelope.. 10 years US Navy Aviation with F/A-18A-D Units. Wish back then we had cameras in our pockets like we do now. they stuff we could have posted from the Cold War Era would make this look like a Sunday driver..

[@mario_gt1]

he gave us the 4 minutes of aviation from the plane lands on people video

[@pchelloo]

1st clip Fighter Pilot: Was close but absolutely *Beautiful* ! He pulled that sh*t off like a Boss. Could this get him in the Guinness Book Of World Records?

[@geemanbmw]

Everybody making a big deal about the F15 banking hard, Dale Snodgrass did that for 12 years doing Tomcat Demonstration Shows

[@kirbywallace7547]

Wow. I didn't know a Piper was that aerobatic. Impressive lift, there.

[@Charge0Complete]

"...banks too hard." has an implication this video does NOT provide

[@edselcross9536]

I never saw the 'banks too hard'. The Eagle driver looked good to my eyes... tax dollars well spent:D The triple-7 at Narita: been through many a 'gulp' landing there, "the wind was a blowin'"

[@kivancsil]

So this is where those Intamin "experts'' immediatquickpowerjerkbankers come from in the Planet Coaster community after having back injuries and enjoying early retirement.. HARDLEFTHARDRIGHT..

[@josephburkhalter5105]

Beautiful landing without nose landing gear. Almost no damage.,,.

[@gcm747]

I’m just here for the comments on the titles at this point.

[@rocastro37]

Hey dudes, the last scene is a videogame or AI generated... no movement in the trees and too step angles.

[@B61Mod12]

I see you still haven't given up your hypochondriac video titles...... thumbs down

[@Dannysoutherner]

The F15 was not doing anything unusual. He has more than enough power to turn like that.

[@EleanorPeterson]

The no-nosegear landing was excellent. It looks like the pilot kept it teetering on the main gear long enough so that only the 4-bladed propeller got squished. (4 blades definitely a bonus, here; a 2-blader would have offered no support at rest.) Even the bottom of the engine cowling looks undamaged. Very nice - particulary as it's a manoeuvre that's almost impossible to practise. (The aircraft's loading/balance changes with every flight, so each landing is unique.)

[@LancerMyMan]

Why does the RCMP have C-12s? What are they surveilling with them? Canada used to be a nice place.

[@Space-ei8lv]

If “banked too hard” = might’ve spilt his coffee, just know that fighter pilots drink their coffee BEFORE take off. So don’t worry.

[@TheMrMused]

That JAL 777 had a whole lot of PIO!!! Jesus himself couldn't have done a better job with that PC-12. Hope the pilot got a BIG raise for the amount of money he saved in repairs with those skills! As for that Piper Cub .. that's the magic you get when you combine a really good pilot and a really good cinematographer!

[@hawkertyphoon4537]

That Piper Cub pilot really enjoyed that moment, eh! Canuck Police landing must have been upsetting for the Pilot... nobody wants to damage their own Machiners. Eagle driver... just standard procedure. Those beasts are not meant to fly in a boring manner.

[@shawnstone4949]

F-15 can turn wayyyyy harder than that!! I live in a town where they are still training with them.. amazing plane,the F-15…..

[@ricbarker4829]

PC12 "Minor damage" I guess is it relative but prop and engine strip, inspection and repair alone is North of $250,000. but I guess being a 2013 NG it is probably valued at 5-6 mil.

[@bricefleckenstein9666]

The F-15 did not "bank too hard", or they would have crashed. That one was lightly loaded, would have had a TON of power-to-weight ration (probably 1.3 perhaps a little better) to help push it through the maneuver.

[@jamesadams7212]

On that Iberian’s reject, I didn’t see spoilers or thrust reversers. I understand the no spoilers if they were below about 72 kts but why no reverse?

[@deanlawson6880]

Wow! That sweet slow landing of that PC-12 without the nose gear.. Nice! Also - That was some really beautiful video shots of the wingtip vortices at the end - Sweet!!

[@theophilhist6455]

The Piper vortex image was super cool...The Iberian run looked like the pilot was pushing to do 50 mph. Smart change of plans.

[@brianhaygood183]

Wow, that PC-12 came down so gently the nose fairings didn't even touch the ground. Just supported on a non-rotating prop. Couldn't ask for more. Is this the best reason to run a 4-blade prop ever? Ha.

[@lewisg7614]

I'm sorry but the royal Canadian MOUNTED police... How the F have they got horse's to fly plains???..

[@cut--]

"Too hard" implies he made an error. I'm done with this chan good-bye

[@ThePaulv12]

Baked too hard would be so theres no vertical component of lift. As he banked it went up. Hard landing wasnt that hard. If youre goung to continue clickbaiting ill have to stop watching - youre choice.

[@jerryellingson7349]

Watching the cub’s wingtip vortices reminds me of the days of crop spraying with the supercub and looking back at the end of the field to see where the drift was going

[@dunkTheFunk]

It is ICE powered. Wtf is the point of this thing? Use a helicopter. What the world really needs right now is more high Co2 per Km mode of transport for the few. For fuck sake.

[@tsclly2377]

ya.. the F-15 pilot quickly let of some bank.. and well done. I've seen this at Oshkosh, but not that low (initial bank)...

[@AlexandarHullRichter]

1:36 a prop strike is not minor damage. Anytime a propeller touches the ground, the engine has to be overhauled or replaced. Doesn't matter if the engine stops first.

[@grondhero]

That first clip is from your video *_"Lufthansa A320 Engine Explodes On Takeoff"_* five days ago at the 48 second mark.

[@yzmoto80]

Passenger in the fighter jet @0:18 : “Ahhhhhhh….ok….I’m good here…please let me out !!!!! Pilot : “we’re still taking off moron” !

[@facedeskdinosaur]

It wasn't too hard, but nobody would've clicked on the video titled "Fighter Pilot Banks A Reasonable Amount"

[@Just1American1966]

"A good landing is one you can walk away from. A great one is when you can reuse the airplane."

[@b2tall239]

Forgive me, but......which was the plane that banked "too hard"?

[@4edward61]

Banked hard, yes. Too hard, well, no. At least he climbed out. I watched one go across the tops of trees while "banking" at Norton AFB years ago.

[@dwaynebrietzke]

Did the F15 pilot suffer G-LOC? No? Then did not bank too hard. Thumbs down for the blatant clickbait title on video.

[@mikeh.753]

With the amount of thrust he was putting out at that point he could have pulled it straight up in a bank like that. But it does look like he got a little input from the G limiter in the flight control computer.