As a petrus main, *Petrus is NOT garbage at all!* Petrus has the lowest movecount out of the "big 4", so if you struggle with TPS, it can definitely be a good method (roux has M-flicks, which not everybody is good at.) Yes blockbuilding is kinda un-ergonomic, but considering you never need more than 15 moves for 2x2x3, it makes up for it. Try it. The only problem is lack of resources.
@RowanFortier2 жыл бұрын
Hey thanks for watching :) The argument "roux has M-flicks, which not everybody is good at" is not a valid argument. You could say that CFOP has M-flicks during EPLL (U-perms, H-perm, Z-perm), which not everybody is good at. The solution to that is to simply learn M-flicks. You could say: CFOP has F2L, which not everybody is good at. It doesn't mean anything because cubers are constantly learning new things. Blockbuilding is unergonomic in every method that uses it, so that cancels out as a factor when comparing blockbuilding methods. I see your point with 15 moves for a 2x2x3 block (which solves 7 pieces, excluding centers), but Roux F2B solves 10 pieces excluding centers in about the same amount of moves. That being said, there are definitely some improvements for petrus, like Athefre's APB algset. It's an alright method, I use it sometimes when I see an easy 2x2x2 block. Maybe not garbage, but still pretty low in my opinion.
@devanshkandwal2008 Жыл бұрын
Big 4 are now big 2 I guess
@altfaker Жыл бұрын
petrus avg 50moves roux 45 moves bruh
@Scudmaster11 Жыл бұрын
@@devanshkandwal2008 big 3 axualy... but petrus is still far up there as being the one with the least moves possible
@thetwirl5842 Жыл бұрын
Axualy?
@emmanuelmacron43 жыл бұрын
Bro I discovered your channel like 5 week ago and I have the same passion as you : cube methods! And making a tiere list of methods is a very cool concept
@Nehimsupacac2 жыл бұрын
I like how being highly algorithmic is great for all methods, except for roux, that is great because it's highly intuitive 😂
@RowanFortier2 жыл бұрын
As you can tell, my list is completely without flaws or bias of any kind 😎
@KaelHitchcock2 жыл бұрын
It’s good for methods to have an intuitive start, because you can optimally plan it
@L4ngyAge Жыл бұрын
@@KaelHitchcock I'm in your discord lmao
@0Aquamelon3 жыл бұрын
I don't think Petrus should've been ranked as garbage. it's definitely memed on but it has a lot of the same advantages ZZ has but starts with block building instead of EO. also: the block building can be fairly similar to roux at some points.
@JamesonJamestackSwick2 жыл бұрын
Not everyone likes ZZ
@0Aquamelon2 жыл бұрын
@@JamesonJamestackSwick I didn't say everyone did...?
@ThePersonWhoAsked694202 жыл бұрын
so basically ZZ but 10 seconds slower
@0Aquamelon2 жыл бұрын
@@ThePersonWhoAsked69420 considering there are 10 second Petrus averages: that’s a huge compliment to ZZ
@AnItalianPerson Жыл бұрын
Bro’s stuck in 2005
@linuseriksen63173 жыл бұрын
Very underrated vid.......I definitely think you got most of the main points in every method. In general one of the most clear vids on KZbin.
@idratherbecubing2 жыл бұрын
Where do you think Nautilus would rank on this list? I use Roux, but I’ve been thinking of switching to L5E Nautilus.
@Israel-NilesАй бұрын
Cfop being lower than lmcf is crazy considering 90% of the top solves use cfop
@lukascubes91324 жыл бұрын
well somehow i didnt get the notification about this until just now lol
@user-vd3pw6yf7b3 жыл бұрын
0:40 I like how the green pieces on your jacket is transparent
@RowanFortier3 жыл бұрын
Green screen 😂
@mattevans16437 ай бұрын
The other thing about the corners method, every piece except the last 4 corners can be solved intuitively, so it's great for teaching someone how to solve the cube.
@ardnamalas13572 жыл бұрын
Finally somebody who see ZZ's variants potential.
@zzCubing2 жыл бұрын
i like zz too.
@michalkloucek473 Жыл бұрын
I would like to see cuber Kodakun making this tierlist. He is like a master in every method.
@lukan65232 жыл бұрын
2:33 a majority of the speed cubers are angry
@pepkin882 жыл бұрын
Roux is godly, because is intuitive Heise is garbage, because is intuitive And CFOP is medium, because has rotations, whut? Also you said that Speed Heise ends with 3 corner commutator, which is intuitive, therefore bad. Like, bruh. I guess all top blinders could be faster, if only they learned algorithms for those cases, instead doing them intuitively each time. Oh, wait, they do them algorithmically.
@gustavopinedaxd Жыл бұрын
honestly, nonsense roux: completely intuitive so godly haise: completely intuitive so garbage zz: has too many variants one has to be good this gotta be the worst arguments I've ever seen
@cringeSpeedrunner Жыл бұрын
My custom method : EPBOSD 1. Eo : EO 2. Pseudo : “Pseudo Side” e.g. a white side with some yellow pieces 3. Belt : Belt 4. Oll : OLL 5. Seperation : Seperation, e.g. 5x5 centers 6. Dual Pll : Do both of the plls Edit: Left block, EO, rightblock, corners, L6E works too as a custom method
@The_yellow_monke Жыл бұрын
Isnt that just cfop with more steps?
@sudipsadhu4930 Жыл бұрын
What is name of last method and the method with no picture please search
@RyanKennelly034 жыл бұрын
I like how ZB is bad because it has too many algorithms but Water Roux is godly... lol
@RowanFortier4 жыл бұрын
Objectively optimal
@RowanFortier4 жыл бұрын
Wait, water roux wasn’t on this list 👁👄👁
@RyanKennelly034 жыл бұрын
@@RowanFortier Oops I meant LMCF
@chasethescientistsaturre50092 жыл бұрын
@@kerkare good only if you're good at recognizing each zbll.
@watchf Жыл бұрын
I agree but I feel like cfop should be put a bit higher it has a lot of resources and recognition with it's algorithms and tricks. And you can do it rotation less with certain F2l tricks. And it has a lot of expansions including Summer Variation, COLL and a lot more. It's also what has been setting all the 3x3 WRs.
@slowcuber6764 Жыл бұрын
How is ZB worse than CFOP? It's actually incredible to solve last pair + last layer in 2 algs!
@Luna77543 Жыл бұрын
Probably bc ZBLS is a trash set
@spinnyboijesus Жыл бұрын
@@Luna77543 hellllllll nah
@Luna77543 Жыл бұрын
@@spinnyboijesus it is pretty bad, especially if you’re doing it slot neutral
@GiovaniSierra-0Ай бұрын
@@Luna77543I hate zbls but Zbll is just 😍😍😍
@cubealgs101 Жыл бұрын
bro zipper is the best method thank you for putting it in godly tear
@hristina9684 Жыл бұрын
What about APB?
@itzecuber6 ай бұрын
So much knowledge!
@andreasolvera22464 жыл бұрын
You got the pronunciation of Mehta right! Also glad to see Mehta in the god tier :)
@RowanFortier4 жыл бұрын
“11/10 customer service” - Blobinati Central
@andreasolvera22464 жыл бұрын
@@LazyBeverage Yes, I'm working on the TDR variation.
@kerkare2 жыл бұрын
@@RowanFortier metha should be in godly god tier and also lmcf
@igorson79293 жыл бұрын
Why CFOP in Medium, like most of professional cubers use it, so why did you put it so low.
@RowanFortier3 жыл бұрын
In the beginning of the video I mentioned that the video was about how good the methods were theoretically. And there are a lot of methods that are theoretically better than CFOP, even though the fastest speedsolvers currently do use CFOP
@connorbingel713418 күн бұрын
The petrus slander will not be tolerated. It’s the same concepts as roux except it’s better and you have more options for the last layer. Also it’s my main method and at one time I averaged 16 secs with it(I may or may not have quit cubing for 2 years and lost 2 secs on that since then lol)
@connorbingel713418 күн бұрын
Also I know nobody cares but APB is just straight up worse than classic petrus
@bagacodecorococo54932 жыл бұрын
hey! petrus is cool for single handed!
@futurecuber243 жыл бұрын
How do you spell mehatau method? Btw amazing video, you are so creative with designing new methods!
@RowanFortier3 жыл бұрын
Thanks :)) It’s Mehta, though it’s an Indian word so the H is kind of pronounced twice like mehuhtah
@voidrxreal4 жыл бұрын
did you consider Mehta-TDR as part of Mehta?
@voidrxreal4 жыл бұрын
Mehta-TDR is much faster than regular Mehta, also there is Mehta-OS
@RowanFortier4 жыл бұрын
@@voidrxreal I did Mehta-os
@voidrxreal4 жыл бұрын
@@RowanFortier I think that the original version of Mehta is Mehta-6CP. Mehta-OS is different because there are more alg sets and you might not always go down the 6CP path, you might decide to do DCAL or some other path, depending on the solve
@RowanFortier4 жыл бұрын
@@voidrxreal that’s correct :)
@voidrxreal4 жыл бұрын
@@RowanFortier also why did you quit Mehta? i saw your post on the discord server.
@myfirstchannel67356 ай бұрын
how could you put cfop in good
@cadensspecials9 ай бұрын
Hey, I love Petras I don't actually know it though I tried learning it. It was cool
@randomdude_12335 Жыл бұрын
Why did you put Heise in garbage tier? Xd
@chaymatabchich8942 жыл бұрын
And whats the one best method
@The_yellow_monke Жыл бұрын
Roux ( in my opinion )
@babeewoda83162 жыл бұрын
where would RUbar rank?
@berserkscribe2 жыл бұрын
great video, BUT in my opinion Roux is godly (maybe because I use Roux...)
@mr_mcgee1 Жыл бұрын
The LEOR method is actually just APB in a different order
@cadensspecials9 ай бұрын
You forgot the beginner method, I use it called the Daisy method it doesn't really matter though I'm learning new ones
@benc4423 жыл бұрын
Sad petrus noises. For the F2L i use petrus to build a 2x2x3, then insert the final piece of the cross, and insert the last two pairs as CFOP. I find it easier to plan the 2x2x2 and then expand to 2x2x3, than planning the cross and look for the first 2 pairs.
@RowanFortier3 жыл бұрын
oooh, nice! Petrus-CFOP hybrid, I like it!
@victhecuber59562 жыл бұрын
@@kerkare Petrus is amazing.
@molybd3num8232 жыл бұрын
kinda similar to building an xcross
@yBryan12 жыл бұрын
I'm confused what's the difference between leor and petrus
@Moodle-f4p4 ай бұрын
We should have a remastered version
@victhecuber59563 жыл бұрын
I think PDQF should be down a tier because there is parity and x2 rotations.
@lukascubes91324 жыл бұрын
ZB is actually my main method but I don't know full ZBLL
@abendregen52113 жыл бұрын
ZBLL is a requirement for ZB
@thecubingprofessor45033 жыл бұрын
It’s gonna take you a 100 years to learn all the algs.
@lukascubes91323 жыл бұрын
@@thecubingprofessor4503 yeah probably
@thecubingprofessor45033 жыл бұрын
@@lukascubes9132 if you did learn everything that would be legendary.
@lukascubes91323 жыл бұрын
@@thecubingprofessor4503 i know just over 100 ZBLLs then took like a 2 month break. Hopefully by tomorrow I can start learning again.
@cainebarrettduggan53373 жыл бұрын
Dude for me when I use belt I don't rotate.
@victhecuber59563 жыл бұрын
That’s impossible… unless you know how to do last layer upside down.
@cainebarrettduggan53372 жыл бұрын
@@victhecuber5956 it's not impossible.
@alexcurrie87262 жыл бұрын
my meathod: 2x2 then 3x3. steps: solve the 2x2 state. explanation: do i even need to explain? steps: solve the 3x3 state.
@alexcurrie87262 жыл бұрын
not mine
@RowanFortier2 жыл бұрын
Nice do you mean like solve the corners first, and then the edges?
@kchromaticpiano2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer4 ай бұрын
If you don't know why CFOP is in medium it is because of its algorithm abuse (78 algs in total)
@BarkandTwigs3 ай бұрын
So you mean lat layer algs or full cfop is 120
@coolpizzalf8960Ай бұрын
@@BarkandTwigsno 78 algs
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer8 күн бұрын
@BarkandTwigsYes, but it is 78
@coolpizzalf89608 күн бұрын
@BarkandTwigs nobody learns “algs” for f2l
@pizzastock111 Жыл бұрын
what about 1 look (43 quintillion algs)
@vivekviju276 ай бұрын
Bro cfop literally broke all the 3x3 twohanded records what do you mean it is medium? it is godly
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer4 ай бұрын
Nah, it's medium, imagine having 78 algs
@leenaagrawal21856 ай бұрын
first block , eo , cp + belt ,co + u corner , seprate , p2l my new method rank it pls
@kiraPh1234k Жыл бұрын
My favtis Roux But ZB is rotationless too
@egyptiancuber2 жыл бұрын
Nice vid
@Nothing-tr7zk Жыл бұрын
Make tutorial for petrus
@jimmytheiii88012 жыл бұрын
I use petrus and a average 3 seconds faster than cfop but that’s just me
@mrflammable46642 жыл бұрын
I half watched this to look for new methods and half so I knew what methods to not learn
@mrflammable46642 жыл бұрын
Thanks for hearting. I definitely didn't expect it to happen in less than 15 minutes
@speedcubergd Жыл бұрын
Why CFOP médium 😢
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer4 ай бұрын
Because of its abuse of algs
@speedcubergd4 ай бұрын
@@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer bro that was 1 year ago, I don't even do cubes anymore lol.
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer4 ай бұрын
@@speedcubergdLel, same
@speedcubergd4 ай бұрын
@@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer :P
@krosskancelvlogs10 ай бұрын
where is hexagonal fransisco
@MOGCubing3 жыл бұрын
I think 42 is godly
@MOGCubing2 жыл бұрын
I was about to comment the same thing twice lol
@Lukky_gust10 ай бұрын
nacho bro c'mon give Petrus a try yall know Petrus almost become goat before it unpopular for some reason
@coolpizzalf8960Ай бұрын
Because it was pretty hard to look ahead to the do step
@Use_Code_Pear-Luffy20 күн бұрын
ZB is the best method, no?
@bigoofersrock2 жыл бұрын
Where is 1 look entire solve with 43,000,000,000,000,000,000+ algs.
@TheUntitledTagGamer2 жыл бұрын
You didn't do beginers method
@BlueRS123 Жыл бұрын
Where's 42 method ahhh
@adrian.insanoYT3 жыл бұрын
Siuuu
@mateogrzegorczyk69783 жыл бұрын
Why r u such of a hater of the cfop method?
@mateogrzegorczyk69783 жыл бұрын
Nice vid
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer4 ай бұрын
@@mateogrzegorczyk6978wat
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer4 ай бұрын
@@mateogrzegorczyk6978Wat
@gmd_operation86gd711 ай бұрын
Bro where is apb
@TheHorrorMusician4 ай бұрын
This video was made in 2020 APB was made Jan-Dec of 2021 It did not exist.
@bruhcubing36802 жыл бұрын
I broke my cube yesterday hahaha
@RowanFortier2 жыл бұрын
Damn. There's some nice puzzle on www.thecubicle.com :)
@mysticaltree48753 жыл бұрын
Thats not 42 thats watterroux bruh
@RowanFortier3 жыл бұрын
The pictures are kind of ambiguous lol
@Donu_tLover10 ай бұрын
bro just roasted cfop 😡
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer4 ай бұрын
Wat? it has got 78 algs, that's an abuse!
@GiovaniSierra-0Ай бұрын
@@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemerBro stop replying to every cfop fan saying "It GoT 78 aLgOrItHmS sO iTs BaD
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer8 күн бұрын
@@GiovaniSierra-0I did
@love2o99 ай бұрын
Putting CFOP in medium shows so much bias 😭
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer4 ай бұрын
Imagine having 78 algs💀
@love2o94 ай бұрын
@@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer it's not even hard to memorize the algs. You use them every single solve
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer4 ай бұрын
@@love2o9NO! MY AGRUMENT! NOOOOOOO!!!!!1!1!1!1!
@love2o94 ай бұрын
@@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer imagine resorting to mocking instead of explaining why the argument doesn't work
@AndreuAlphapibeTheMemer4 ай бұрын
@@love2o9It was a joke, dude. I have even expected you to reply "Lol"
@zzCubing2 жыл бұрын
LOL my dad would put heise in godly because it has 0 algs
@browny32124 жыл бұрын
Hello
@davidepstein73972 жыл бұрын
all of them are garbage apart from cfop and roux if we are being honest
@RowanFortier2 жыл бұрын
based
@zipper-sea89773 жыл бұрын
pog godly
@itzecuber6 ай бұрын
CFOP medium XD
@mrhelloguy2 жыл бұрын
69th comment
@RowanFortier2 жыл бұрын
Lol
@Basitblaze3 ай бұрын
😂😂
@Sznchester10 ай бұрын
zz isnt great, very bad lookahead, basicaly worse cfop
@guiwarr9 ай бұрын
If you do eocross its not that bad and there are good variants