Sin-ch. Love your videos bubba. I know it's not your 1st language
@SmartSmella57817 сағат бұрын
I was confused at first too. I was wondering "what is a sheek? never heard of that one"
@warren317415 сағат бұрын
@@SmartSmella578 I kept seeing the Iron Sheik.... I WILL HUMILIATE YOU! 😂
@DeepSkyDude17 сағат бұрын
Great info. For now I think I'll stick to my Vulture and see how this ship develops as we move along.
@OmnipotentJC15 сағат бұрын
Don't forget that each buffer will get 1scu jammed. So if you set them to auto eject before you start scraping, you can get 12 on grid, 2 jammed, and 13 in buffer without having to leave the seat.
@Damaboo14 сағат бұрын
Did you actually do this and confirm?
@IrisCorven4 сағат бұрын
@@Damaboo1 Yep. Works. Just tested last night.
@BigUpVideo3 сағат бұрын
they jammed our radar sir ……… strawberry
@IrisCorven4 сағат бұрын
Everyone dunking on the Fortune - I love it. I go out, I scrape, buffer fills, it auto ejects, I take four boxes off the side and shove them in the back, it auto-ejects 4 to replace it, I top off buffer, I park at freight elevator, and I unload it from the sides and the elevator without anything getting stuck, glitching through a cargo ramp and disappearing, or having to fiddle with min-maxing box placement. Not to mention the clearance under the ship makes unloading both sides extremely fast.
@Polyyboy136 минут бұрын
I'm the same, I pledged it and so far I'm loving it. Is it the best and most efficient? Probably not, but not everything is about efficiency 😁
@Mr1FTW12 сағат бұрын
I agree - it should really be able to take two layers to compensate for the slower scraping to make the Fortune more viable.
@Accipiter113814 сағат бұрын
The thing I'm not sure I like about the Fortune is that the exterior cargo actually kinda turns against you when you go to unload. Step 1: Unload cargo Step 2: Go back up the ladder/elevator and eject from the buffer Step 3: Unload cargo Step 4: Go back up the ladder/elevator and eject that last 1 SCU from the 13 SCU buffer Step 5: Unload 1 SCU of cargo At least with the Vulture I can park up next to a cargo elevator and fling boxes out the back as they come off the printer.
@tgjaedan13 сағат бұрын
You can do that on this, too. It auto ejects until the grid is full so if you are standing outside pulling boxes off as they reject it will keep going.
@Techigai12 сағат бұрын
Yeah, just turn the auto eject on? Can switch the other side for CMATs if you want.
@Damaboo14 сағат бұрын
Nicely done! I did find a problem while using my Fortune last night. With Auto on both panels, once you fill both sides with boxes, you get a Blocked warning which keeps you from filling the storage hopper from scrapping. I believe you have to go back to the panels and turn off the AUTO, so you can scrape and fill your hopper. Will be testing this latter today, will post if confirmed.
@Spacenaduvari7 сағат бұрын
Thank you Foxy for testing all those things! appreciate it very much.
@kilozulu241312 сағат бұрын
Great job, Cap. You got farther with testing than I did. I ran into a series of bugs with it that stopped me from testing the different scrapers. You can move the modules with a backpack, btw.
@ytth4394 сағат бұрын
I know its cool to hate on the fortune right now but I like it better than my vulture. I like the cockpit view, I like not having to not leave my seat if I don’t want to.
@obaniehia17 сағат бұрын
running the abrade on mine haven't tried the trawler yet . but i did find out that the auto unload for selling is working now!
@brianrichey750913 сағат бұрын
Glad you are actually able to play, I'm stuck on New Babbage with no way to get to my hanger since CIG can't even manage to keep elevators working after 13 years of development. I'm drawing near the end of my time with Star Citizen if they don't make some serious improvements soon.
@FrancisFjordCupola8 сағат бұрын
When you go to the NBIS asop terminals from the metro station, up the stairs ... most people instinctively pick the left-most elevator. The right-most elevator did work. That led to people hogging the elevator and trying to jump in it. But the elevator only gets a destination to your hangar if you called the elevator. So you need to have called the elevator. Can't jump queue.
@Cmdr_V7 сағат бұрын
You also won't see your hangar in the elevator if you don't call a ship first , for the first time only
@Joao_Pereira895 сағат бұрын
Had the same issue yesterday and i've stoled a ship parked outside customs 🤣
@AlexisK16 сағат бұрын
If you could snap two layers of boxes to sides, it would make the vulture irrelevant.
@Lord_Retrospect14 сағат бұрын
good , drake bad
@HamsterSoup14 сағат бұрын
nope it would make sense, the vulture has 2 heads and can scrape much faster, it would be interesting to have one that is faster and another that can carry more at the cost of being slower
@ghazman61414 сағат бұрын
I don't know if it is my imagination, but it seems to me to take longer to strip a ship than it does a panel. As for the Fortune, it is a great buy if you enjoy mediocrity. If the crates double stacked auto-magically, then it would have been worth the sacrifice of the second head. It's like they did not analyze the data on how we use the Vulture. We jam that thing with 37 boxes on average before we fly back. The Fortune is a missed opportunity. TBH, I really wanted something that fit between the Reclaimer and Vulture, that auto-stacked the boxes. Nice video Capt. Thanks!
@ThomasHessDK11 сағат бұрын
The breakdown Cinch: takes longer, but you get the most RMC. Abrade: good balance between speed and output. Trawler: when you need to make a ship disappear fast (illegal missions) - but since you can fracture a ship while it is still 100% unscraped, trawler looses it purpose.
@violent___serenity3 сағат бұрын
Trawler is good for those nooks and crannies that you can’t be bothered to precision scrape with a cinch. Also once you fracture only the main part retains scrapeable area, at least in my testing. Some non-main parts may have area that can be scraped but gives no rmc.
@Wortho2717 сағат бұрын
But can it fit a Carrack inside?
@DeepSkyDude17 сағат бұрын
We must try
@faristhehonest15 сағат бұрын
Yeah gonna stick to my Vulture
@DaKineGuy17 сағат бұрын
Too bad the boxes don't move out like they do in the trailer. Looks kinda funny ejecting into an existing box and the warping to the grid.
@btr00316 сағат бұрын
I've just been using mine for cargo hauling. The SCU space is enough for those 72k missions
@matthewkaye72212 сағат бұрын
As it stands its the same price as the vulture yet the vulture does what this does just better and faster. One of two things will make it worth the price point. Either make the head scrape faster or make a second despenser in the back so you dont have to eva to fill those last 4 boxes just move them how you would in the vultcher. Otherwise your paying the same for less
@greylock598517 сағат бұрын
Nice video.
@viperx69742 сағат бұрын
You can fit quite a few inside as well so 12 x SCU, 4 on cargo, 13 internal buffer, but you can actually fit around another 10 inside not on grid
@psilence015 сағат бұрын
Very informative vid. Thank u!!
@CarlitoTries7 сағат бұрын
Could do a side by side comparison with the best heads. Vulture vs Fortune to see what is the exact difference in time.
@bigarmydave10 сағат бұрын
Can you manually attach boxes on top of the side ones? You could then free up space on other side, so it continues to auto load.
@essentialasa16 сағат бұрын
I'm on the fence. I need to test it some more
@Volf19168 сағат бұрын
Possible Bug - Did you test the ejectors to see if the Fortune has the dupping bug that makes infinite rmc boxes the way the Vulture did when it first came out?
@Citizen-Actual22 минут бұрын
I still don’t understand why the salvage frame only stores 12 scu when the same frame for mining can do 32scu. Weird…
@nrjclar8 сағат бұрын
Yeah ... should have had a bigger scu capacity, would easy have been able to have a 3X3 grid in two layers on each side, which would have made it so much better and a lot closer to what the Vulture are capable of
@DirteeBloo12 сағат бұрын
2 layers of boxes on the sides wouldn't make sense with the auto ejection system. Plus 7 SCU (2+3+2) fits comfortably inside (depending on the user) so around 36SCU overall. Decent hauls compared to Vulture.
@confreeknor117 сағат бұрын
People with missing mission markers try verifying the game files worked for me. I do this between every version of the game and ive had no problems with markers since
@karmabad628716 сағат бұрын
I did a full fresh install for 4.0.1. Markers are still broken
@Yorky11714 сағат бұрын
Alt+F4 then rejoin your session to get your mission markers back. Ik this sounds like bait but it actually works
@karmabad628714 сағат бұрын
@Yorky117 I think I'll wait for a hotfix.
@davewills612110 сағат бұрын
So!, if i melt the Vulture i'll loose the gorgeous Buccaneer, not an issue as i'll buy one, yet i do belive ''No Loaner for the Fortune'' is probably an oversight.........possibly?
@Nero-Caesar17 сағат бұрын
I miss the fps weapon insurance
@ValosarX15 сағат бұрын
I can fit 16 scu inside easily off the grid, CiG claims it can hold 18 in the QA but I couldn't make that happen lol.
@RCSPARTAN7711 сағат бұрын
no gimble?
@Gubers12 сағат бұрын
In practice the abrade is miles better than the others. I've timed entire runs and dozens of panels. The Abrade propertiesjsut make it so much faster. On my Vulture I always use 2 Abrade and only scrape large panels. I only scrape the smaller triangle panels if I need just 1-2scu more for a load, so I don't have to find another panel spawn. But If I don't think I can get enough scu from a full load with what's left at a spot with abrade but can with Cinch then I'll switch. Saves a few minutes from time to time. Otherwise straight up Abrade is far superior even with the reduced efficiency.
@litefire0117 сағат бұрын
Dumb question could you hostile (pirate) tractor the boxes off using another ships turret tractor beam, Taurus/corsair/c1/cutlassB.
@corwyncorey370314 сағат бұрын
only when shields are down.
@confreeknor117 сағат бұрын
you can put scraper modules in ur backpack
@RazrBurn14 сағат бұрын
It’s 4.0.1 not 4.01. The second decimal means something.
@recasa6113 сағат бұрын
Maybe not 2 layers but at least 2 buffers
@jimrussell406215 сағат бұрын
You can sell that RMC.... IF your game doesn't crash like usual.
@honey-fe6pj6 сағат бұрын
Shouldn't you have compared salvage heads while scraping the panels i.e. panels are the exact same size to pick the same sized ones to test. But thanks for this.
@BDA113716 сағат бұрын
Gong Xi Fa Chai Foxy!
@shadow9109779 минут бұрын
so cinch is pronounced more like inch but with a 'ss' , so the pheonetical spelling of cinch = sinch
@FrancisFjordCupola8 сағат бұрын
It's not "chique", it's "cinch" ... Think: zintsj!
@matthewfletcher46275 сағат бұрын
It's pronounced `sinch` Like, it's a cinch, it's easy.
@NovaRexus6417 сағат бұрын
Seems underwhelming. Need to be balanced better, maybe to hold more cargo
@hellgeist_17 сағат бұрын
Time to scrape the same scu of salvage for the Fortune vs the Vulture is *not* equal, because of the number of heads. Vulture can produce 2x as fast, has way better flight characteristics, yet the ships cost the same. Fortune should not cost more than a Prospector considering how much weaker it is than its competitor
@Wayne72LEVRAI16 сағат бұрын
Your also forget the interior, way easier to stack your containers in the Vulture than the Fortune (both ships can bear 39 scu in total), you don’t even have to move to do it with the Vulture, for the Fortune you need to go outside to take containers one by one… and i don’t even talk about the f*cking doors… It should have been labelled around 130 or less. But maybe CIG will give him a size 2 salvage head very soon.
@warren317415 сағат бұрын
@@Wayne72LEVRAI Agree. Considering this can handle cargo too , it should have been a starter ship and half the price of the vulture.
@corwyncorey370314 сағат бұрын
And yet it is *far* superior for team based salvage. New ships are only "competitors" in that they are similar price points in a similar role, but their specifics and gameplay styles vary wildly, making them useful in their own ways. Just like how every car manufacturer has a sedan, a compact, a hatchback, a SUV etc. every ship corporation will likely have a version of each role for every ship job, with enough variation to make them all useful in a variety of ways. The days of every new ship being a new meta may be (thankfully) over.
@hellgeist_13 сағат бұрын
@ Its marketed as a solo salvage ship, not a team-based salvage ship. It is possible to defend the Fortune with other strengths but multicrew isn't applicable here.
@TheTheoblad11 сағат бұрын
But it can be team based, with someone pulling boxes as they auto eject, and loading them onto a cargo ship
@Leptospirosi17 сағат бұрын
If just CiG had worked on a RAFT chassis instead of this!!!
@OnlineObsessionista9 сағат бұрын
This sounds really stupid, the price for both salvage ships is almost the same, but misc is twice weaker
@mndeg12 сағат бұрын
and it could also have a tier 1 medbed and exploration style scanning station and a place to craft stuff and drones and 6 size 6 weapons. it should all fit
@RickFarris8 сағат бұрын
The word is "sinch", Foxy, not "chic". Check the dictionary if you need to...
@Biter197512 сағат бұрын
No Mans Sky has just done a mic drop on Star Citizen. CIG might as well quit at this point.
@rdoydleannt10 сағат бұрын
o7
@tmulligan87912 сағат бұрын
HEHE, He said "Salvage Head"...
@sirberticus381516 сағат бұрын
"SINSH", not "Sheik" (Sheiks live in Arabia)
@VortexStolenName16 сағат бұрын
the conveyor belt system should be standard on the Vulture and the Reclaimer. This company is such a joke.
@vibrationNC15 сағат бұрын
SHEEEEEEEEEK! LOL :-)
@jimmmybacon904316 сағат бұрын
wrong, you can buy the scraper modules in the stanton gateway station