Find a classical Protestant Church: www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edi... Find a MODERATE Mainline Protestant Church to help revive: www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edi...
Пікірлер: 649
@The_Proud_Texan7 ай бұрын
0:00 Intro 2:02 Myth 1-Protestants don’t value tradition 6:25 Myth 2-Protestants don’t believe in the Eucharist 10:17 Myth 3-Protestant churches have all “gone woke” 16:11 Myth 4-Protestantism is all about personal interpretation 19:48 Myth 5-Protestants think there was no church before Luther 23:34 Bonus Round-Protestants don’t care about beautiful churches
@maximgruner7 ай бұрын
“Bro every patriarch of Moscow has been picked by the KGB for the last 100 years”. Dang man that’s cold, Kyle is definitely coming at you for that one.
@jacobmartinez52637 ай бұрын
😂
@kevinfromsales94453 ай бұрын
Which is why Russia is no longer communist or else it would've been either communist or another debt slave country of USA / Israel.
@kevinfromsales94453 ай бұрын
Which is why Russia is no longer communist or else it would've been either communist or another debt country of USA / Israel.
@kevinfromsales94453 ай бұрын
Which is why they are no longer communist or else it would've been either communist or another debt slave country of USA / Israel.
@kevinfromsales94453 ай бұрын
Which is why they are no longer communist or else it would've been either communist or another debt slave country of USA
@JaggedJack17 ай бұрын
I haven't played minecraft in many years, but aren't you supposed to never mine straight down lest you fall into a lava pit? And also never mine straight up lest you be crushed under falling gravel blocks?
@giving27677 ай бұрын
Yeah he’s living on the edge in this one
@fastsupercool7 ай бұрын
his only fear is God
@rosswalenciak37397 ай бұрын
There are some people who have showed that statistically it isn't very likely to be a problem, but generally yes.
@elijahcandage7 ай бұрын
Actually, now it's never mine straight down lest you fall into one of those new ungodly massive cave systems to your death.
@unit23947 ай бұрын
Yes it bothers me in a lot of his videos lol.
@mmtoss65307 ай бұрын
Zwingli: *the only major reformer who was a memorialist* Catholics and Orthobros: Look at what all Protestants believe
@zachsmith89167 ай бұрын
I mean even that’s not really true. Zwingli had a much more nuanced view than simple memorialism. He really believed that Christ was present through the Holy Spirit. He obviously doesn’t believe in physical presence because he believed Christ was physically reining in Heaven but he saw it as an act of communion with Christ or as a spiritual meal with Him rather than consuming him.
@harrygarris69217 ай бұрын
@@zachsmith8916 well both Martin Luther and John Calvin, who themselves believed in something less than the Catholic understanding of “real presence” didn’t see Zwingli as believing in a “real presence”. At some point an empty claim is an empty claim. It doesn’t really matter what you claim to believe if your actions illustrate that you really believe the opposite.
@zachsmith89167 ай бұрын
@@harrygarris6921 I never called it “real” presence but it’s not simply memorialist either. As someone who’s actually read a bit of Zwingli I would point out that Zwingli believed that the Holy Spirit was active but not physically present in communion. My point is that there is actually a difference in a simple memorialist position and a truly Zwinglian one. He doesn’t just say it’s a memorial he literally believes that you’re doing something with Christ just something different than Luther or Calvin who believed they were consuming Christ in some way.
@harrygarris69217 ай бұрын
@@zachsmith8916 right but if you’re not consuming Christ, then the eating of Christ’s body and blood is not a sacrifice. Since a sacrifice requires eating. So the Eucharist becomes an entirely different thing if Christ isn’t present in it. It’s great that he believed the Holy Spirit was active in the communion in some way but the Holy Spirit is supposed to be active in everything that the church is doing so what does that even mean? This is why Martin Luther accused Zwingli of having a milquetoast theology when it comes to sacraments and that doesn’t really believe in anything.
@zachsmith89167 ай бұрын
@@harrygarris6921 My main point is that it’s inappropriate to say he’s just a memorialist when he wasn’t. I never claimed that he was a sacramentalist either. Not being a memorialist doesn’t make one a sacramental theologian. Given Luther’s disposition towards those who disagreed with him it’s not surprising he thought what he did. For the record I don’t disagree that a Zwinglian view isn’t something different my issue is that most non Zwinglians call us mere memorialist when that really isn’t the main thrust of our theology. You only come out saying we’re just memorialist if you operate within Lutheran paradigms which Zwingli clearly didn’t.
@AntiAzovIndividual7 ай бұрын
Not all non denominational/evangelical churches are like that either :/ Edit: didn’t mean to start an argument, but I also want to clear up what I said, I too can find them overwhelming or missing the point entirely *but* at least some that I’ve seen are pretty humble in architecture or just use hotels. The bigger the church is, and how much it is or resembles a mega church, the more it usually misses lots of stuff/becomes too cooperate). Otherwise, we do lots of casting out demons, missionary work, and charity stuff, that is what makes us unique (and in my opinion, better).
@kriegjaeger7 ай бұрын
He's got an issue with this; He can see others paint with a broad brush and considers it a bad thing, but not when he does it.
@TitusCastiglione15037 ай бұрын
Which ones don’t act like that?
@CarlJohnsonTheCJ7 ай бұрын
@@kriegjaegeroh well, let's pray for him, as we should for everybody.
@alexlancaster54557 ай бұрын
The number of evangelical/non-denoms that are confessional and sacramental Protestants with serious regard for church history are a tenth of a percent. If there’s an appropriate use of a broad brush, it’s this situation.
@DrakonPhD7 ай бұрын
@@alexlancaster5455Perfectly proving his point.
@hll97fr167 ай бұрын
Non denominationals are really good people, often really charitable and hunger for the knowledge of the Bible.
@fighterofthenightman10577 ай бұрын
And that’s why it’s so sad they’re in a fake church rather than a historic one.
@oceanview51107 ай бұрын
@@fighterofthenightman1057sorry but all the “historic” churches near me preach a false gospel
@SaltAndSeeds7 ай бұрын
@@fighterofthenightman1057 Jesus Forbids Sectarianism (Mark 9:38-41 ) 49 ¶ Now John answered and said, “Master, we saw someone casting out demons in Your name, and we forbade him because he does not follow with us.” 50 ¶ But Jesus said to him, “Do not forbid him, for he who is not against is on our side.” Matthew 23 23¶“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others. 24“You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel! 25¶“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence John 21 20¶Peter, turning around, *saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following them; the one who also had leaned back on His bosom at the supper and said, “Lord, who is the one who betrays You?” 21So Peter seeing him said to Jesus, “Lord, and what about this man?” 22Jesus said to him, “If I want him to remain until I come, what is that to you? You follow Me!” 1st Corinthians 1 10¶Now I exhort you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all agree and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be made complete in the same mind and in the same judgment. 11For I have been informed concerning you, my brethren, by Chloe’s people, that there are quarrels among you. 12Now I mean this, that each one of you is saying, “I am of Paul,” and “I of Apollos,” and “I of Cephas,” and “I of Christ.” 13 Has Christ been divided? Paul was not crucified for you, was he? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul? 14 I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius, 1st Corinthians 12 12¶For even as the body is one and yet has many members, and all the members of the body, though they are many, are one body, so also is Christ. 13For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free, and we were all made to drink of one Spirit. 14¶For the body is not one member, but many. 15If the foot says, “Because I am not a hand, I am not a part of the body,” it is not for this reason any the less a part of the body. 21And the eye cannot say to the hand, “I have no need of you”; or again the head to the feet, “I have no need of you.” 22On the contrary, it is much truer that the members of the body which seem to be weaker are necessary; 23and those members of the body which we deem less honorable, on these we bestow more abundant honor, and our less presentable members become much more presentable, 24whereas our more presentable members have no need of it. But God has so composed the body, giving more abundant honor to that member which lacked, 25so that there may be no division in the body, but that the members may have the same care for one another. 26And if one member suffers, all the members suffer with it; if one member is honored, all the members rejoice with it. 27¶Now you are Christ’s body, and individually members of it. 28And God has appointed in the church, first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, various kinds of tongues. 29All are not apostles, are they? All are not prophets, are they? All are not teachers, are they? All are not workers of miracles, are they? 30All do not have gifts of healings, do they? All do not speak with tongues, do they? All do not interpret, do they? 31But earnestly desire the greater gifts. And I show you a still more excellent way
@fighterofthenightman10577 ай бұрын
@@oceanview5110 How so?
@coffeehousedialogue56847 ай бұрын
@@fighterofthenightman1057How else? Professional activist hijacking by the woke. Why go to a "historic" church when you have better options doctrinally?
@Dominus5647 ай бұрын
As for the "Protestants are woke" thing, I can say positivity that many Protestant churches I've worshipped in were very conservative. I know many students and faculty from the New Orleans Baptist Seminary who were very theologically conservative and socially conservative. So there is hope.
@gilgameschvonuruk49827 ай бұрын
The state churches in Germany and other European countries are very woke. They use church tax money to promote woke ideas. Also many left wing/woke people in the catholic church cite Karl Barth, a Protestant, as an Influence.
@pedroguimaraes60947 ай бұрын
It is important to say that Theological Liberalism is an issue in Europe and North America, protestatism don't face these problems in Brazil, Africa and Asia.
@Galahad_Du_Lac7 ай бұрын
@@gilgameschvonuruk4982Germany doesn’t have a state church. Also a good chunk of Catholic left wing nonsense comes from red priests in South America as opposed to being some Protestant import.
@vwvwvwvwvwvwvwvwvwvw97 ай бұрын
Hell the Pope is more liberal than protestants 😂
@Galahad_Du_Lac7 ай бұрын
@@pedroguimaraes6094 I think it has much more to do with which party is in the minority than which one is inherently more liberal.
@gumbyshrimp26067 ай бұрын
Can you make a video about what each Protestant denomination thinks about other denominations/branches being saved or not? For example, Lutherans might say Orthodox are saved, but Orthodox would call Lutherans anathema.
@TheJoeschmoe7777 ай бұрын
Not all Orthodox would confess that, actually. Outside the super trad orthobro community most of them are pretty relaxed.
@avigoel3217 ай бұрын
Orthodoxy does view Lutherans as outside of the true church. However, the general Orthodox doctrine is that we know where the Holy Spirit is present (the Orthodox church) but we can't say for certain where it's not present. Matthew 7:21 - it isn't our job to think about who will or won't be saved. We focus on only our own repentence and walk with God.
@gumbyshrimp26067 ай бұрын
@@TheJoeschmoe777 Fair enough its just an example of what I might think. That’s why I want him to make a video elaborating on every denominations position of every denomination.
@5BBassist4Christ7 ай бұрын
Outside Protestantism, the view of anathema is actually quite different. To Protestants, an anathema is a condemnation to hell and a proclamation that the said person is a heretic who is not saved at all. To modern Catholics and Orthodox, anathema is basically an excommunication from the Church. Which, is I guess another thing to be addressed. To Protestants, all Christians who are saved are part of the Church that Jesus Christ established. To Catholics and Orthodox, only their church is the Church. Some would say Protestants and the other can be saved, but they are strictly not part of the Apostolic Church (and by Apostolic Church, they mean their tradition). So in a nutshell, to Protestants, an anathema is an excommunication from Christ and the Church Universal (or Invisible Church), which means they are a heretic who is not saved. But to Catholics and Orthodox, anathema is an excommunication from the Church, -and by the Church, they mean their branch of Christianity, in which sense a person may still be saved, but not be a part of the Church (or Visible Church, -their view of the Visible Church). So it might sound like an anathema or excommunication is stronger in Protestantism than Catholicism or Orthodoxy, and yes, it is. It is stronger in the same way that racism and sexism is stronger to conservatives than it is to liberals. Because Catholics and Orthodox have to excommunicate everybody and say they're not part of "The Apostolic Church", it waters down the meanings of heresy, anathema, and excommunication, but because the Protestants try to refrain from anathematizing people who disagree with them, these terms have stronger weight to them. P.S. Examples from every Protestant denomination can be found thinking other people are heretics who are going to hell, but most Protestants (particularly of the Evangelical type) would be more relaxed on this. There are also some Catholic/Orthodox tradition that do also condemn everybody else to hell too.
@silaswarren84187 ай бұрын
People don’t realize how diverse non denominational churches really are. My church has a Presbytery, dedicates our babies (low church answer to infant baptism), and holds a high view of communion and baptism. Zoomer, you are great and I thank you for all the hard work you do, but we’re not as bad as you think :)
@redeemedzoomer60537 ай бұрын
“High view of communion” what is the view specifically?
@silaswarren84187 ай бұрын
@@redeemedzoomer6053 not to your standards. However, it may be the highest other than the Catholic church in my town
@redeemedzoomer60537 ай бұрын
@@silaswarren8418 is your town a non-denominational island or smth? You SURE there isn’t a Presbyterian, Methodist, or Episcopal church, in town?
@justinscholl7 ай бұрын
@@silaswarren8418 but whats the specific view?
@silaswarren84187 ай бұрын
@@redeemedzoomer6053 There is one Methodist church, but honestly I hold more non denominational convictions than you do. I know you don’t like us, I think it’s not fair, but I respect and thank you for your contribution and the education I have earned from watching your videos. Thanks m8. I guess I’ll always be heterodox to you lol
@MrClawson997 ай бұрын
I am studying to become a lutheran priest in sweden. And yes our state-church is sadly very liberal. But i must say that i meet so many priests who fights back against this and i see much hope. I think, among many other swedish theologians that the main issue is the church counsel who is directly connected to the profane political culture(yuck!). But there are also many trying to cut the bond between Swedens secular state and the religious church(they say its cut, but it really isnt). And there is a movement(Called EFS) in the church of sweden who is much more ortodox than the state chuch.
@yardbro67133ooovsbsnskkw7 ай бұрын
I am catholic from sweden, but I can say it's a real shame seeing svenska kyrkan becoming so liberal and the role of religion being undermined in swedish society.
@MrClawson997 ай бұрын
@@yardbro67133ooovsbsnskkw Yeah, i have great respect for the catholic church for being better at staying with the Bible. Pray for me as i try to be a part of the solution that Svenska kyrkan needs🙏 bless you
@rohan72247 ай бұрын
Come home to the Catholic Church.
@MrClawson997 ай бұрын
@@rohan7224 Well i dont agree with some dogmas, so id be kicked out anyway, or not permitted to recieve Jesus blood and body… I would love a greater equmenical climate between every body of believers. But just throwing thiese slogans out is not going to work.
@budicaesar12136 ай бұрын
Are you part of the reconquista? Are you in the discord server?
@MasteringJohn7 ай бұрын
As I understand it, the reason why Catholics came to withhold the wine during the Eucharist was as a consequence of the doctrine of transubstantiation: if you believe that the wine has been turned into the physical blood of Christ, then to spill it would be the gravest sacrilege. This is also why there was a practice of the priest consuming the remaining elements after the Eucharist was distributed (which introduces obvious problems when concerning alcoholic beverages).
@ramennight7 ай бұрын
But if its blood now why would it make the priest drunk??
@neochris27 ай бұрын
@@ramennightBecause the doctrine of transubstantiation says it changes substance, not accident. What you experience with all your earthly senses remains.
@bigtobacco1098Ай бұрын
I have been to catholic mass and the people drink the wine
@toest_mitch7 ай бұрын
Hi! I just wanted to say, your channel is amazing. I agree with 99% of everything said. I’ve watched through around 5 videos now and they’re all amazing to me. Keep up the good work!
@Young_Anglican7 ай бұрын
Great video. Your fellow traditional Protestant thanks you for this content 🫡
@Lexster9187 ай бұрын
I am a recent convert. I was baptized a month ago. Before that I was raised agnostic. I don’t take communion because I have celiac disease. This definitely kept me from becoming Catholic. There is a lot of focus on the Eucharist in Catholicism… I have been troubled by this. I can’t eat wheat. If I do it harms my body. No one really can give me a solution to this. I have changed my life and no longer sin like I used to. I hope I will be saved regardless.
@brock2327 ай бұрын
Ask your pastor to concentrate gluten free bread?
@Lexster9187 ай бұрын
@@brock232 I have asked and he said he would give me gluten free bread. I’m the only one there who has this request. I wonder if it is valid sometimes. It depends on how someone views the Eucharist. For some churches, wheat must be used. It does weigh on me. I’m so new to Christianity so I still have so many questions. 🤷♀️
@ogloc63087 ай бұрын
First of all, first reply is correct. You should ask your pastor if they can give you gluten free unleavened bread during communion. Second of all, your salvation doesn’t hinge on communion. Many denominations might disagree but we are saved by grace through faith. Communion is a spiritual experience and we are commanded to obey it but ultimately communion is not what saves you. You should still participate in communion but try and see if you can get some gluten free bread. I’m not very familiar with that disease so i don’t know how detrimental a small piece of bread can be
@Lexster9187 ай бұрын
@@ogloc6308 thank you for your answer. It is an autoimmune disease. The smallest amount of wheat causes antibodies to destroy the villi of my intestines. If this happens, I can’t absorb nutrients. So I can develop cancer or other diseases as a result. In the short term, I will vomit if I eat bread and have intense pain in my abdomen.
@Lexster9187 ай бұрын
This diet I have to follow has so many restrictions that I feel like I’m fasting constantly. It really changed my outlook on life. I also feel like it led me closer to God as a result. It was a really difficult journey when I was diagnosed in 2017.
@tru_ambition7 ай бұрын
You're pumping out content like a machine! Keep it up, man! :> Not if you need a break, of course. 😅
@sturgeonslawyer7 ай бұрын
"We are saved by faith alone; but the faith that saves is not alone."
@An_dres_art7 ай бұрын
So true. Faith 🤝 works We are saved by both bc it’s impossible to do good works without Faith or have Faith and be sterile like the fig tree.
@sirwondernut28156 ай бұрын
@@An_dres_art So all the atheists who do good works have Faith?
@An_dres_art6 ай бұрын
@@sirwondernut2815 good works are only good works when you have also faith or leads you to have faith, otherwise it’s just altruism, natural empathy sometimes ego. When we said good works we are talking in the biblical way, as described the Epistle of James, and St. Paul, and the sermon of our Lord in the sermon on the mount. Also it’s possible for someone to have faith inspired by God doing good works, we see in the gospel many pagans, samaritans, and non-Jews doing good works and finding the Faith through it.
@sirwondernut28156 ай бұрын
@@An_dres_art That doesn't answer my question. So good works aren't actually good works? They're only good works when Christians do them? What in the hell kind of gatekeeping is that? Also it's near impossible for someone to come to faith just by seeing someone doing works. As Paul said, faith comes by HEARING, and hearing by the Word of God.
@An_dres_art6 ай бұрын
@@sirwondernut2815 seems like you didn’t even read what I said, I make a difference in the biblical concept of good works and altruism that by nature we are disposed too, and I didn’t said you can get faith doing good works the Faith is a gift from God, thats why I clearly said “have faith INSPIRED BY GOD” bc you can’t reach it by yourself, doing or not good works, I thought the answer was implicit, wasn’t that hard to understand, in short, no an atheist can’t do good works bc they don’t have faith or love while doing it, understanding “good works” as a fruit of the faith, if you gonna take it literal as probably you will, then everybody can do good works and not have faith, so an atheist doing “good works” will be in the same spot of a “christian” who doesn’t do good works or doesn’t love the neighbor or doesn’t follows the gospel. Hope it’s more clear for you know, if you can’t still understand what I said I will try it to simplify it more.
@Suavemente_Enjoyer7 ай бұрын
2:45 Dang, you must’ve been predestined to get that coal… Great vid as always! Love you brother!❤
@dryingpaint63757 ай бұрын
13:45 It's also worth remembering that many of the patriarchs of Constantinople were chosen by the Ottoman Turks.
@sololoquy37837 ай бұрын
Huh that makes sense... Orthodoxy has survived outside of Constantinople though. I hope by now they have re-calibrated and burn away the chaff. If they truly root themselves in the authenticity of early Christianity, then I am optimistic.
@disciplecraig7 ай бұрын
I really enjoy your content. I do not know of anyone that enjoys minecraft and bible teachings except for me in my circle of friends. To see both makes me smile everytime I see one of your videos.
@tannr7 ай бұрын
One of these days you are gonna dig straight into lava you can't avoid, you should dig 1x2 mineshafts so you can see what's below or at least carry a water bucket. (sorry to backseat minecraft)
@maxxiong7 ай бұрын
Keep inventory is on
@Corpoise09747 ай бұрын
Why did basically every protestant denomination abolish confession and holy orders?
@Keebybacc7 ай бұрын
Could you make a vid about all the Protestant reformers and their beliefs/denominations?
@Hilter4207 ай бұрын
Luckily Pastor Jim managed to preserve the true Christian faith after Constantines Catholic henchmen polluted it for a 1200 years
@micahrose45627 ай бұрын
who is pastor jim?
@Hilter4207 ай бұрын
@@micahrose4562 Pastor Jim is a stereotype Protestant pastor (often non-denominational or of some absurdly specific denomination), akin to Susan from the Parish Council, Fr. Youngtrad, Karen, etc.
@matthewvanburen64157 ай бұрын
If he hadn't buried the last remaining copy of the KJV for his successor Pastor Bob to find, true Christianity would surely have been lost.
@SolitaireZeta7 ай бұрын
@@micahrose4562 Specifically he's a parody of Independent Fundamental Baptists who subscribe to the "Trail of Blood" theory.
@calebhooper42667 ай бұрын
@@SolitaireZetawhat’s the “Trail of Blood” theory?
@asdfnewguy70297 ай бұрын
Hey, Zoomer, hope you're well! Just wanted to leave a comment regarding non-denominational churches, and your feelings towards them: For context, I'm Reformed Anglican, and I have visited many non-denominational churches where Bible teaching is misused or neglected (ie. female pastors, disorderly prophesying or tongues, worshiptainment, etc.) I feel like their leadership may have some heart for God, but are acting in terrible foolishness neglecting tradition and communion with fellow believers to hold them accountable. These are churches where even the elders feel like they are fed on and feeding spiritual milk not solids, and missing out on the richness of the faith. *However* I have encountered the same in denominational churches - I particularly recall a Methodist pastor referring to God as "heavenly parent" so as not to offend anyone with a bad father (according to him), and nobody within his denomination had called him to account. Furthermore, I have encountered non-denominational churches that exercise a high degree of wisdom and regard for history and tradition (I've seen Polycarp and Chrysostom quoted), including confessions of faith much in line with classic Protestant confessions despite no official membership, affiliation or communion with them. My point is this: denominationalism does not guarantee sound doctrine. There is wisdom in community and historic grounding, but like abuse is possible in denominational and non-denominational alike, so too are wisdom and sound, historical doctrine possible in denominational and non-denominational alike. God bless you, brother! Keep up the good fight!
@cephandrius52817 ай бұрын
Thank you for this, Zoomer's ignorance in this area is really quite disappointing, and his attitude is really bad for Christianity. Where I live, most of the nondenominational churches have doctrine nearly identical to Presbyterianism, with the exception of infant baptism. Heck, back in highschool, some ladies from a local nondenominational church taught a class on the Westminster confession.
@livingweaponnightmare7 ай бұрын
Really like this content clearing up the craziness that is often pushed on how protestantism appears to be to Catholics. If both sides had this exercise more, perhaps we can see the prayer of Christ be answered; that we be ONE
@SteinBee7 ай бұрын
In Mexico, there is a "church" that worships coca-cola according to my catholic Brazilian friend
@protozoanpro7 ай бұрын
I really enjoy being Dutch reformed, that is all 🗿
@dragonjo75507 ай бұрын
the way i believe we all should view different takes on our faith, is with the knowledge that someone else might have more right than us. therefore we need to operate in grace towards eachother, even when we refuse to give ground on certain church disputes
@SaltAndSeeds7 ай бұрын
Jesus Forbids Sectarianism (Mark 9:38-41 ) 49 ¶ Now John answered and said, “Master, we saw someone casting out demons in Your name, and we forbade him because he does not follow with us.” 50 ¶ But Jesus said to him, “Do not forbid him, for he who is not against is on our side.” Matthew 23 23¶“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others. 24“You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel! 25¶“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence John 21 20¶Peter, turning around, *saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following them; the one who also had leaned back on His bosom at the supper and said, “Lord, who is the one who betrays You?” 21So Peter seeing him said to Jesus, “Lord, and what about this man?” 22Jesus said to him, “If I want him to remain until I come, what is that to you? You follow Me!” 1st Corinthians 1 10¶Now I exhort you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all agree and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be made complete in the same mind and in the same judgment. 11For I have been informed concerning you, my brethren, by Chloe’s people, that there are quarrels among you. 12Now I mean this, that each one of you is saying, “I am of Paul,” and “I of Apollos,” and “I of Cephas,” and “I of Christ.” 13 Has Christ been divided? Paul was not crucified for you, was he? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul? 14 I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius, 1st Corinthians 12 12¶For even as the body is one and yet has many members, and all the members of the body, though they are many, are one body, so also is Christ. 13For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free, and we were all made to drink of one Spirit. 14¶For the body is not one member, but many. 15If the foot says, “Because I am not a hand, I am not a part of the body,” it is not for this reason any the less a part of the body. 21And the eye cannot say to the hand, “I have no need of you”; or again the head to the feet, “I have no need of you.” 22On the contrary, it is much truer that the members of the body which seem to be weaker are necessary; 23and those members of the body which we deem less honorable, on these we bestow more abundant honor, and our less presentable members become much more presentable, 24whereas our more presentable members have no need of it. But God has so composed the body, giving more abundant honor to that member which lacked, 25so that there may be no division in the body, but that the members may have the same care for one another. 26And if one member suffers, all the members suffer with it; if one member is honored, all the members rejoice with it. 27¶Now you are Christ’s body, and individually members of it. 28And God has appointed in the church, first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, various kinds of tongues. 29All are not apostles, are they? All are not prophets, are they? All are not teachers, are they? All are not workers of miracles, are they? 30All do not have gifts of healings, do they? All do not speak with tongues, do they? All do not interpret, do they? 31But earnestly desire the greater gifts. And I show you a still more excellent way
@baldwinthefourth40987 ай бұрын
Zoomer, are you aware of a Catholic named "Confessions of a Convert" who has critiqued some of your content? Will you make a response to him?
@redeemedzoomer60537 ай бұрын
Yes I’m aware. No, I won’t respond cuz I get comments all the time so I can’t respond to it all
@baldwinthefourth40987 ай бұрын
@@redeemedzoomer6053 Alright, God bless you.
@gohanx5179Ай бұрын
@@redeemedzoomer6053 I am not gonna lie to u bro prots are mid
@mitchmclean54357 ай бұрын
I think your criticism of the GMC shows a misunderstanding of UMC polity and the situation in the UMC in the USA. There is no viable way to discipline bishops that are going against church teaching, so there has been a lesbian bishop installed and no-one can do anything about it since the progressives have majorities in America. Once these progressive bishops are installed, they replace your conservative pastor with a progressive one compulsorily who teaches heresy and runs your church into the ground, nothing you can do about it, then that property is lost to faithful gospel witness. Much better to disaffiliate now because for a limited time they're letting you take your property with you, so you can have your historical building and maintain biblical teaching.
@maxxiong7 ай бұрын
About being part of the visible church thing: would you question someone's salvation if they attend the salvation army, or some other assembly that does not do communion (incidentally I have heard a non-denom pastor speculate that the church at Ephesus in Rev 2 stopped practicing communion)? Similarly, would you question someone's salvation if they go to some sort of parachurch ministry like a campus fellowship but not church itself?
@QseftJohn7 ай бұрын
Honestly, I believe that we shouldn't place too much care into the looks of a building. If a church as a nice building but doesn't have enough money to reach the world or help what is the point? Also with the economic downturn, I would be surprised is churches ended up down sizing just to survive.
@lunagrace28727 ай бұрын
I think there is balance. God loves art and understands it value in life. We and angels other then God seems to only be able to make art that has meaning. So art seems to be a special gift to us. God loves true beauty and how art, music… can give people prospective and different ways to understand God himself. But I think the intention are what make a difference. If people are making beautiful church to give honor to God and allow others to see the craftsmen of his people if financial viable then it’s has its purpose. But to make a beautiful church for ego or to show off to other church’s and denomination isn’t right. Most of the money should go back to helping people but using some of the money to create beautiful church is also right. But a beautiful church isn’t necessary but it’s a product of our natural instinct to make something beautiful that is special to us like God himself.
@AllhailTDLjimpic7 ай бұрын
A Church doesn’t have to be expensive to be beautiful. Just a stone Church with stained glass, a nice altar and a few icons works well.
@fighterofthenightman10577 ай бұрын
That’s not really the argument, though. Some of these contemporary churches DO have money and they put that money toward building a modernistic and less sacred church rather than conserving the traditional architecture and style of Protestant churches.
@OkPe-ww5rs7 ай бұрын
@@AllhailTDLjimpicicons?
@AllhailTDLjimpic7 ай бұрын
@@OkPe-ww5rs Well maybe not if you’re iconoclast but in many Swedish Lutheran Church buildings we do and historically have put up icons.
@JasonHoltz7 ай бұрын
I think it worthy to mention that communion under one kind was due to practical reasons. For example, one of the reasons listed in the Council of Trent for communion under one kind in the Latin church was that large quantities of wine might be too expensive or hard to obtain
@jdotoz7 ай бұрын
The specific command to "do this" was given to the Apostles, and in the current age this is carried on by absolutely requiring the priest to consume both species during the Mass. But there is ample evidence of Communion in only one species being administered to the faithful for various reasons going back to at least the third century. In fact, back then it was often the reverse of what RZ complains of. It was an ancient practice to give Communion to infants (which persists in the East today, and as an aside I wish the West would resume it), but back then infants would only be given to drink of the chalice. When, in the same time period, Communion was brought to the sick outside of Mass, they received only in the species of bread.
@pedroguimaraes60947 ай бұрын
@@jdotozJesus clearly gave a command as it is stated in all gospels but you appeal to some obscure examples and exceptions to say that you the Church could do it other way. That is just a small example, but my conscience good never go against what is clear in the Bible in order to follow the Church.
@BestBuddyNoivern7 ай бұрын
Whatever song he has playing at 4:17 is my favorite of his songs. I REALLY wish he would release them on a playlist so we could learn the titles and use them in our own vids.
@papallegatepoope30107 ай бұрын
do you have any vids on the dutch reformed church? or know of anyone here on yt with decent content regarding them? i'm gonna play one in a TTRPG soon and i want to be sure to not come off as ignorant or reductive when it comes to their beliefs and traditions.
@MyYouTubeNS.137 ай бұрын
What do you think about the teachings of Ray Comfort? He always talks about how Catholicism is bad and how the teachings are incorrect, worshiping Marry etc. Just wanted to hear your view on it. Thanks for the videos they help a lot.
@juld557 ай бұрын
The Banana Man himself?
@christsavesreadromans10967 ай бұрын
It’s false teaching, be Catholic.
@Souls_256 ай бұрын
@@christsavesreadromans1096ypur doctrine is false teaching. Be christian man not “catholic”
@lightinshiningdarkness66037 ай бұрын
That was a pretty funny parody of a nondenom church though
@zippitydoodah56937 ай бұрын
Meh. I'm a hillbilly from the southern Appalachians. We observe communion. We observe foot washing. We observe, of course, _Baptism_ . We do these things precisely as Jesus commanded. You seem to think otherwise?
@fighterofthenightman10577 ай бұрын
He can’t speak for every church, but far too many evangelical churches think communion is just a symbol and don’t even take it every week, baptism is just a symbol of faith, have contempt for the ancient traditions of the church, etc. And this attitude that “real” Christianity was lost for years and only reestablished in modern times has more in common with Mormonism than Protestantism. Frankly I think a good first solution is that churches who don’t respect church tradition and have a high view of the sacraments should not identify as Protestant.
@zippitydoodah56937 ай бұрын
@@fighterofthenightman1057 I don't about other churches. I know communion should be a regular occurrence. I have no qualms with a church that takes communion once a year, as long as it is a consistent / /regular part of their practice of worship. Jesus did not specify how often we should take communion. If it was important that we observe it _weekly_ ( _for example, like observing the Sabbath_ ) then he would have told us so, ( _for example, like observing the Sabbath_ ). This is basic logic. ALL 3 of these rituals commanded by Jesus are indeed symbolic. But they are not .........................................." _just_ " ........................................... symbolic, as you accuse these unnamed " _evangelical churches_ " of claiming. We cannot know exactly how many layers there are to the purposes of these sacred rituals, but I believe symbolism is one, though probably the least, of them. Frankly I think a good first solution is that churches who conflate disagreement with a respective Biblical interpretation of a church tradition, with a failure to " _respect_ " a church tradition. be looked upon as suspect. This, along with any church that utilizes the term " _high view_ " when describing anything other than a gander off a mountain top, or a really tall building, should be held as suspect and an object for prayer, as they have the clothing of Pharisaical uppityness. But us hillbillies, we don't know much.
@8chohgee1357 ай бұрын
you got it right
@zippitydoodah56937 ай бұрын
@@8chohgee135 Thank you. I hope we do. It's as simple as following what He said and what He did, whenever possible, as closely as possible, while maintaining the habit of prayer and obedience of the commandments.
@armen4ok2807 ай бұрын
How do I join your minecraft server? Is it public for everyone, if so what’s the IP?
@latindwarf81737 ай бұрын
2:54 Please, do point them out. I've never seen anyone ever claim this thing. EDIT: Please, don't think of this as a hate, but I just think this wasn't a good analogy.
@user-zi7gd9pn3l7 ай бұрын
Neither have I
@DanteD847 ай бұрын
23 years and I’ve never met a single catholic in all the Catholic Churches I’ve been to in the U.S or Vatican. But random Protestants online will assure me that’s all of them 😂
@chessplayer66327 ай бұрын
I know almost nothing about this, so please take this with an entire silo of salt: I think I’ve heard that it is less of an issue in the US and more an issue in South America, but I can’t remember where I heard that claim. At the very least, it would be interesting to look into 🤔
@nathaneasterby60416 ай бұрын
The reason I started watching and listening to redeemed zoomer was because what I see is that he is trying to point out that we as a church have the main thing in common… Christ. We are family. I can worship our God at any of our churches with any of you , no problem..Unification not division. Let’s pray for that.
@chaz13577 ай бұрын
The amount of coal you've left unmined bugged me 😂 great video though
@jacobmartinez52637 ай бұрын
Where do I find the classic sound tracks you play? They sound unfamiliar but awesome
@Ace-3.7 ай бұрын
God bless ❤ All glory be to God
@pablomarques36847 ай бұрын
3:47 mining straight down, this is faith
@tevan_joestar7 ай бұрын
Where did you hear that the KGB is involved with the Eastern Orthodox Church? I'm very interested in Orthodoxy and I want to read up about that.
@ogloc63087 ай бұрын
I think he’s specifically talking about the russian orthodox church, not the greater eastern orthodox church.
@KnoxEmDown7 ай бұрын
After the soviets tried and failed to completely suppress/subvert the church through a combination of executions and restorationist nonsense (think 20th century marxists being put in charge of the church by the government) stalin brought it back in force for patriotic purposes during WW2, but continued subverting and downplaying it as it suited him. Every hierarch was essentially forced to become a double agent in order to serve the church publically, flee Russia entirely and form synods in resistance (which is how the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia, ROCOR was founded) or go underground into the proverbial catacombs risking life and limb to serve their flocks (which happened A LOT, there are dozens if not hundreds of martyr saints venerated for doing it). The subversion continued under khrushchev, carried on more or less until gorbachov and co. lightened up a bit, and then the soviets collapsed entirely "freeing" the church (read: new management, ala putin, who while tyrannical doesn't try to persecute the church out of existence). The current patriarch as of 2023 is a former KGB double agent, who was, if I'm being charitable, forced to inform for the soviet government or not be allowed to serve at all in the above-ground church. I definitely simplified and skipped over things, but that's the general gist of it. ROCOR and the Moscow Patriarchate reunified in the early 2000s, so that's nice.
@yardbro67133ooovsbsnskkw7 ай бұрын
Unfortunately a lot of the patriarchs of constantinople were chosen by the ottoman sultans
@tonic-music7 ай бұрын
What program and samples do you use to make your music?
@PUSH2Tim7 ай бұрын
You’re video has peaked my 14 year old son’s interest. He was wondering what server you’re on 😂
@redeemedzoomer60537 ай бұрын
It's my own Christian server, which will be re-opened to the public this winter!
@VickersJon7 ай бұрын
“Read the historic confessions.” Amen.
@finnabawm90977 ай бұрын
This is really true I am quite baffled by of all these Catholic/Orthodox hymns vrs Protestant meme videos where they show songbirds singing traditional tunes then shift to Crows singing extra modern rock gospel songs, I am like B, please. Most historical Protestant churches today sing and worship with traditional hymnals and with reverence, I've attended 3 Catholic Masses recently and throughout all these masses, modern cringy contemporary hill songs, not the upbeat type but the emotional type accompanied by the guitar were the norm and just one traditional chant the Kyrie Elysion. Maybe this has something to do with the Novus Ordo but most Modern Catholic worship is more "modern" than traditional protestant Worship.
@WIGGER_AESTHETIC_0317 ай бұрын
Hey Zoomer, I would love if you would do some more deepdives on Dutch Reformed Churches and stuff, I really think we have a very interesting History. We also have some beautiful churches in South Africa, you might find it interesting. Sadly, attendance is dwindling post covid, because many people are moving to non denominational churches or Mega Churches here, especially in the cities. In the country the churches are still strong. : ) Im also gonna copy paste this comment under other videos if you dont see it to make sure you see it lol
@pafloy7 ай бұрын
I don't know what denomination is my church, but we celebrate communion every week after the pastor and praise. I believe it's not literal body and blood of Christ but we do it symbolically. At least I do because I understand it as the only ritual Jesus left us in his ministry.
@toddm99107 ай бұрын
As a ND Christian, I find Grace Church Nondenominational both beautiful and hilarious.
@rohan72247 ай бұрын
The Catholic Church is the one true church.
@slavicsandvich59677 ай бұрын
Excellent vid! SDA here, glad we're largely free of wokeness, but it's always creeping around the corner...
@peterubbels23857 ай бұрын
The Catholic church wasnt called the pornocracy in the middle ages, it is a term coined by protestant historians in the 19th century and the only source backing this is a contemporary kardinal who was personally invested in the power ruling families of Rome held in the city of Rome. To keep it short, it is a huge leap to state it as a fact and to refer to it as in the middle ages is misleading since it covers a period of only 60 years.
@cementplant34417 ай бұрын
For your first point: While I agree that we can't judge an entire tradition by the beliefs of a small handful, the amount of Catholics that worship anyone but the Trinity, or believe the Pope is more divine than any normal man, is just that, a very small handful. The amount of Prods that speak along the lines of your quote "Its just me and my Bible, I don't care what the Church Fathers say." is a large large portion, maybe closer to half of prods here in the US at least. I know Lutherans, Methodists, Baptists, diet Baptists (nondenoms), Presbyterians (liberal ones to be fair), and Pentecostals that all speak along those lines. Lutherans (the group I'm the most familiar with) differ very very much depending on the individual church. Their synods sort of just double check every once in a while that they're all on at least mostly the same page. There is not a direct set of doctrine aside from Luther's catechism and honestly those points are heavily debated and believed in varying degrees between Lutherans. For your second point: The Sacraments/Holy Mysteries are all biblical and directly administered to the clergy by Christ Himself. He baptized to cleanse Original Sin, He heard confessions and forgave sins and gave the Apostles the power to do the same, He instituted the priesthood, Communion/Eucharist, Confirmation, Extreme Unction, and Marriage between one man and one woman. They're all traditions instituted by Christ, and in every single prod denomination, they fail to observe all seven. Lutherans recognize two or three, and they have the most. Apostolic succession is ancient and gives a given Church direct ties to Christ through his apostles. There isn't a single protestant denomination that recognizes the importance of that tradition either. Protestants do not observe all of Church Tradition and in fact reject much of it directly. For your third point: Mainline denominations are definitely overwhelmingly liberal, and as an Eastern Catholic, I'd agree they dance on heresies beyond being out of Communion with The Church. They are overwhelmingly unbiblical, anti Christian, and unfortunately a terrible place for Christians to find themselves. There are some conservative offshoots that have sprung up recently to maintain their correct doctrine, and represent a small minority overall, sadly. While its true that Pope Francis is absolutely the most liberal Pope ever seen before, there is a dramatic uprising in Catholic churches to adhere to tradition. The Traditional Latin Mass, and faithful who change Rites to Eastern Catholicism, like me, are becoming more and more common every year. The conservative movement in the world of Protestantism is shrinking, which makes me very sad. The future for prod denominations looks bleak. For your fourth point: The True Church is the Church founded by Christ through Saint Peter. Leaving communion with that Church (which absolutely still exists) is to definitionally deny His institution for personal beliefs. His instituted Church on Earth follows everything Christ commanded of His Church. To deny that Church is to deny the commands of Christ. We uphold everything He created and maintain it until His return. The pope's seat as the Bishop of Rome is descended from Peter. To deny these fundamentals in any capacity is denying Christ. This isn't a collection of beliefs that are malleable, this is a concrete collection of Christ's and His Apostles' works 2000 years ago. For your fifth point: To leave the original and true Church behind for any reason aside from repairing it from within is exactly analogous to your issues with conservative protestants running away from mainline churches to create their own instead of remaining in place to repair the damage done. We could have a Lutheran Rite, a Presbyterian Rite, etc if those with alternative traditions wished to remain in communion with the original Church. The variation between my Byzantine Church, the Roman Rite Church, and the Maronite Church is astounding. We have very different traditions but remain in communion together for the sake of upholding the True Church that Christ established. The way things are going currently within the Latin Rite, its looking like its possible that the new "mainline" Novus Ordo mass attendees may eventually have their own Rite within the Latin Church. We could have a Latin Rite and a Roman Rite to represent the traditional Latin Mass and the new school Novus Ordo Mass parishioners. Most Churches would remain a part of the Roman Rite, but just as they already exist now, the Latin Mass specific churches would just take on the title of Latin Rite, or Tridentine Rite, or whatever they'd choose. Provided the Pope allows that, of course. Its common for the Catholic Church to just form a new Rite to allow people to remain in Communion and keep their own traditions.
@aalis_online38306 ай бұрын
You should do a video of the split in the Anglican church. Fir example, the Anglican church of Nigeria split from the church of England due to the hijacking.
@AnonymousIdealist6 ай бұрын
Wow
@Interns-Eternal-Empire7 ай бұрын
pl give me the ip to the server also i have a good more traditional anglican church i go to and its a Church of England church charlie the rector and Francis the vicar they are both great chaps
@retrictumrectus10107 ай бұрын
3:53 That's one block away from falling down😂
@lauramikow23817 ай бұрын
I'm in the LCMS and we're not as narrow as the WELS (Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod).
@resonation67767 ай бұрын
"What's this? This is what some presbyterians think all nondenominational churches are like".
@AllhailTDLjimpic7 ай бұрын
Most of them do look like that. If you can point me to a non-denominational Church that has liturgy and properly administers the sacraments, go ahead.
@jonathanhernandez79577 ай бұрын
@@AllhailTDLjimpicremenant radio hosts are all from non denominational churches, and have a high view of tradition, they believe in real presence in the sacrament of communion and also resite some of the creeds that every church should believe in. I myself believe that every single church should have an understanding and study of the first 6 ecumenical councils. I think we can all agree. I understand my brothers and sisters in Christ that have a low view of tradition, I understand how it can be distracting from the most important thing, which is God. But should also understand that some tradition is fundamental in worship. That’s why we should take part of communion at every service, and not just once a month like most non denominational churches. It’s sad that there are some denominations that don’t even celebrate the Eucharist, and some only take part of it once a year during Easter.
@exactly90997 ай бұрын
I've never been under the impression that baptism saves, more just that it is an outward and public manifestation/display of your salvation and commitment to live for Christ. I don't understand the concept of "baptism saves" if a person who is never baptized before their death will still be saved anyway. It doesn't have any logical consistency.
@chessplayer66327 ай бұрын
Check out Jordan B. Cooper (Lutheran) or Gavin Ortlund (Baptist) for some really smart Protestant defenders with different interpretations of what “baptism saves” means
@jeannier59387 ай бұрын
I'm glad u give transcript because I can't follow with the constantly moving Lego pieces.
@johnnyrico36374 ай бұрын
I don't know about most, but I am part of a non-denominational church which holds tradition close. We lean towards evangelical, Lutheran (obviously), and Calvinist views though. We are highly organized, small, and very impactful in our community. Sola scriptura and tota scriptura!
@JB-em9po2 ай бұрын
Where was the church before the Protestant reformation? Where was your face before you washed it?
@electrolytics7 ай бұрын
Thanks RZ.
@voldmerot7 ай бұрын
How amusing this video turned out to be, and I'm not just talking about the Minecraft in the background lol
@brandonquan91277 ай бұрын
How are you able to explain all of this while playing Minecraft? Or is this separate gameplay?
@hugo_studio_hay4397 ай бұрын
as i am from latvian, i didn't get the thing you kinda said.... can you explain pls
@zippitydoodah56937 ай бұрын
Yes. He can explain. No. He likely won't.
@electrolytics7 ай бұрын
I believe he said that all the European "State" Churches or official Churches are very Liberal. Except the Latvian Church(or the Churches in Latvia.)
@hugo_studio_hay4397 ай бұрын
@@electrolytics tnx m8
@TeamTwiistz7 ай бұрын
I didnt expect a Minecraft video when i clicked on this
@5BBassist4Christ7 ай бұрын
Practically every single one of these misconceptions about Protestantism is what lead my best friend to converting to Catholicism, and another one of my friends to converting to Orthodoxy. One other misconception that lead my best friend to Catholicism was that Protestants have bad music/art compared to Catholics. It was funny when I went to mass with him, and they played hymns written by Protestants. The old saying, "The lie is half-way around the world by the time the truth is getting out of bed" really is telling on this. He now realizes those are all bad arguments, yet they are the arguments that made him change important views and sever friendships. I believe it was Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi who said the perfect preservation of the Quran was the argument that lead him to Islam. He now recognizes it as an untrue argument, but says Allah used the lie to lead him to the "truth of Islam." Should truth be rationed through lies? Catholics, don't celebrate when Protestants come to Catholicism from these misconceptions and strawmans. Let us all be compelled by the truth and not prey on the ignorance of others.
@brick-men7 ай бұрын
Bro is actually on the Christian minecraft server
@niksari667 ай бұрын
I totally support your idea of the reconquista but sadly in my home country of Finland the mainline chuch is essentially the only church and they only ordane pastors who follow their liberal theology. So the mainline is pretty much too far gone. I feel like this is the same situation with my Nordic brothers (correct me if I'm wrong) so we shall see what happens in the coming years in this part of the world at least in terms of the churches.
@AllhailTDLjimpic7 ай бұрын
Yup, it’s looking bleak for us nordics. What’s important is trusting in God and praying for our brothers and sisters in Christ.
@LoveTheLord777 ай бұрын
Make a home church brother, be the difference
@seminoleboy967 ай бұрын
Join the Orthodox church
@rohan72247 ай бұрын
Come home to the Catholic Church, the true spiritual heritage of all Protestants in Scandinavia.
@AM22Salabok7 ай бұрын
Bros digging straight down
@CooperTheGoosebumpsGuy5 ай бұрын
Amen ❤❤🎉🎉😊😊
@Arpitan_Carpenter7 ай бұрын
Baptists serving Mountain Dew and Doritos for communion
@gratermccheesy96507 ай бұрын
That’s funny. Kinda like Brave New World.
@chessplayer66327 ай бұрын
This is the equivalent of saying something like “Presbyterians putting up pride flags instead of reading the Bible” Or “Catholics worshiping Mary instead of God” It paints with too broad a brush and does not help to move conversation forward EDIT: Sorry, I don’t mean this to be aggressive. I just get wearied seeing low-church traditions being shown so much disdain while problems in other traditions seem to be allowed free passes, but maybe that’s just a symptom of the content I am consuming
@gratermccheesy96507 ай бұрын
@@chessplayer6632 Yeah, but those are actual accusations made against those groups, while this is not. Its not pushing the conversation forward since it’s just meant for a laugh.
@sharkinator78195 ай бұрын
“We are the only ones who take the Bible literally” (proceeds to drink grape juice instead of wine for communion)
@danielnavarretedis7 ай бұрын
Please do a video explaining the apocrypha
@YaBoiOlivah5 ай бұрын
My church says it’s Non-Denominational but in reality it is a very conservative Pentecostal ( I.E all the sacraments, hymns and chants ect)
@livingweaponnightmare7 ай бұрын
What is the basis for the Solas?
@charlesyip92027 ай бұрын
But i am not sure your view suit other country because for malaysia it is hard to build a church , there fore non baptist or non denomination is easiest to plant.a church
@CptManboobs7 ай бұрын
There is an Anglican Church in my hometown that has painted the steps of the church in Rainbow Colours and regularly advertises BLM on their sign out front.
@lunagrace28727 ай бұрын
At least you know immediately that it’s not a true church of Christ and to not go to that church. It’s sad the world has come to this but the only positive thing is it’s easy to see what they’re agenda is. 😅
@CooperTheGoosebumpsGuy5 ай бұрын
Amen❤❤❤🎉🎉😊😊
@mazda78737 ай бұрын
*digging straight down*
@jimluebke38697 ай бұрын
"Where was The Church before Luther?" (Catholics) "Where was your face before you washed it?" (Doug Wilson, or at least he quotes it often)
@sputz8424 ай бұрын
I believe non-denominational churches reflect the geographic location and society. I have had the fortune of traveling the world and attending churches in many regions. My home church is non denominational, small, and in an old church building built in the early 1900s. This is in central Pennsylvania and I am sure that the small town has something to do with it's conservative basis. If you want to reference the degrees of conservative that redeemed has discussed, it would be a 2/3 on his scale and is Arminian. We sit on pews and have 2 services, one where you sing hymns, and the other is contemporary(not a full band though), but both services are the same sermon. We have one church in this town that falls into a lot of the stereotypes that it seems most you have seen. Oddly for me, I have witnessed far more traditional non denoms than contemporary. My first experience in a Lutheran church was that it was a slightly more contemporary version of what I am used to. My experiences in big cities have been... unfortunately, far more liberal non denominational churches with the multimedia presentation and such... I think the liberal mentality of the population seeps into the churches in these locations. I am not a person who agrees with being tied to a denomination, however I can absolutely see the need for them, to try and give a consistent representation no matter the location. However, like redeemed said, it seems like the denominational conservatives need to recapture the church, since a lot are veering from the original slate.
@anycyclopedia7 ай бұрын
One of the major issues is that over 70% of Protestants belong to radical non-denominational and Baptist churches. As a result, MOST Protestants do not place a significant emphasis on tradition. Therefore, it is correct for Catholics to assume that most Protestants hold to their own personal interpretations. Most Protestants I met on Twitter/X don't care about Church Tradition at all, some even said Church Father's were false teachers. However, some Lutherans I met online have a higher regard for Tradition, some of them even venerate Catholic Saints.
@MatiasPopa267 ай бұрын
I would like to see a video about infant baptism, pros and cons
@tategarrett30427 ай бұрын
Hey, you mentioned briefly (and you did redact it) that James White isn't representative of the Protestant tradition - I've been listening to a bunch of his lectures and he seems to be one of the most historically rooted ones around, so I'm curious what made you make that comment? Maybe it was just a slip of the tongue, but I'm just wondering if there's thinks I don't know about him, or if perhaps you aren't too familiar with him.
@bradlygray19747 ай бұрын
The gripe people have had with him is viewing the historic traditions only through a reformed lens. Of course that is his conviction on truth, however issues arise when you start to decipher meaning from ancient history using only one, very particular, means of deriving that meaning. (I am not by definition a Christian, although through study my convictions have changed drastically on the matter. I say this to clear up that I myself do not have the best understanding of Mr. White, and am quite literally on the outside looking in.)
@tategarrett30427 ай бұрын
@@bradlygray1974 Hmm interesting. I was referring more to that Christians might see him as unorthodox in the theological sense, but I don't think he is. To be sure he sees the evidence he deals with through a Reformed Christian lens, but he is forthright about this, and I think does a very convincing job of illustrating the evidence that supports his position.
@kuafer36877 ай бұрын
Are Evangelicals always non-denominational/baptist?
@kriegjaeger7 ай бұрын
"Evangelical" is a meaningless term like "Right wing" or "Left wing". Mostly it's used for "Those people I don't like" and occasionally "My side" but usually if people try to sit down and define it, there's no clear attributes. For instance, people who take the bible as literal where it's meant to be literal will be called by theological liberals as "Evangelical". But people who consider a relationship with God the most important aspect of worship will be called by those who value tradition higher "Evangelical". Basically if they don't like you and you aren't liberal, the slur is "evangelical".
@ardensvirens7 ай бұрын
Historically, no. In the modern United States, generally yes. The term goes back to the Reformation (Lutherans in Germany are known as the "Evangelical Church", and all Prots are "evangelical", meaning "spreading the 'evangelion" or "good news" of the Gospel of Christ). In the US, Baptists and "Non-denoms" did the groundwork in the late-19th and 20th centuries, so now it's the cultural "default" if you're not Roman Catholic but still Christian.
@tenko55417 ай бұрын
4 conditions must be met to be an evangelical: American nationalist, fundamentalist, dispensationalist and Zionist. It needs to be all 4. An evangelical can be from any denomination but they will typically be baptist, Pentecostal or Non-denominational because in these denominations there isn’t a high regard for church history or traditional doctrines. It’s not a slur but it is a terrible term that misappropriates the word evangelical.
@MO-bo2du7 ай бұрын
@tenko5541 Evangelical is a very broad term but it generally just means 1) broadly conservative, and 2) high view of scripture. I think you've defined it too narrowly (and disdainfully it seems?)
@vlebz_lock7 ай бұрын
Does anyone know what Charismatic Christians are?
@redknightsr697 ай бұрын
Most conservative Presbyterian denominations are reformed Baptist. I swear.
@redeemedzoomer60537 ай бұрын
Correct. That’s why I’m trying to de-liberalize the PCUSA
@redknightsr697 ай бұрын
@@redeemedzoomer6053 LMFAO. Not gonna lie, some churches within the ACNA are closet big box Presbyterians. The ACNA is such a diverse mix. Not hating, just pointing out.
@adamandsethdylantoo7 ай бұрын
@@redknightsr69 being fair, the Episcopal Church and, by extension, the entire Anglican Communion that the ANCA came from was always under a "big tent" framework where anyone was accepted so long as they held to the 39 articles and the liturgies in the Book of Common Prayer. The ACNA seems to want to preserve that diversity in worship styles and the non-essentials of doctrine, just with a greater emphasis on tradition and the essentials of the Christain Faith (In other words, you can have Anglo-Catholics, Charismatics and Reformed in the same denomination, so long as they affirm the biblical teachings on Theology and marriage/gender.)
@brighoftheleash157 ай бұрын
My Baptist church ironically has Presbyterian members. Since there’s practically no conservative Presbyterian churches where I’m at in Indiana! 😳
@Liethen7 ай бұрын
@@redeemedzoomer6053 have you ever looked into and commented on the "Politics of American churches & religions in one graph"?
@psychopathmedia7 ай бұрын
8:47 Most of the individualistic "solo scripta" mentality is just a branch of American exceptionalism. The levelling tactic is "only God can judge me" as a way to dodge criticism, and you'll see it most in the Southern States where Southern Baptist is predominant
@charlesyip92027 ай бұрын
I found those who claim non denominations actually start their own denominations
@ajgibson13077 ай бұрын
God bless
@konignickerchen72657 ай бұрын
Video idea: apostle tier list.
@Hail_Christ_the_king7 ай бұрын
How can I join the Minecraft server
@jacobbrown49717 ай бұрын
Dr. Craig is a Weslyan which continues the remonstant Protestant tradition. So broadly Arminian, and coming out of the Methodist Church, but he is still a traditional Protestant. Just for clarity I am a Presbyterian (EPC) by conviction, but Dr. Craig played a large part in my returning to the faith and I think it's unfair to say he's not a traditional Protestant.
@user-dn1iw8eo3q7 ай бұрын
How do you join the server
@matthew47127 ай бұрын
5:05 this is merely practical and many still offer communion in both kinds. But either is the whole and indivisible Christ, and thus the body itself is sufficient. This is not a superstitious practice.
@gabrielfrund94977 ай бұрын
Usefulcharts use also the Council of Nicea 1 in history of christianity