Just in case ya'll missed the description, this is a reupload. The original was hit with a copyright strike and removed so I had to edit it.
@Gravity4612 жыл бұрын
Dang, that sucks
@KitsuneCentral2 жыл бұрын
So, what did you have to remove? Just curious.
@the_autism_express2 жыл бұрын
:(
@roshasensi22202 жыл бұрын
oh
@roshasensi22202 жыл бұрын
wait who the fuck will copyright strike a train video
@XenithXenaku2 жыл бұрын
6:03 The start of a _long_ feud between Darkness and British Railways...
@jaymz52672 жыл бұрын
I laughed way too much at the 10800 saying “I don’t wanna work today, it’s just…I don’t feel like it.”😂😂😂 Great video btw!
@peterwhite95462 жыл бұрын
you forgot to mention that the 6-2-0 crampton also exploded because the boiler was too thin
@mikofox97982 жыл бұрын
The *what*
@solar_98782 жыл бұрын
Thats just a *minor* detail it’s definitely not *important* and definitely *doesnt need to be told* to *new* operators
@r.srailfilms25592 жыл бұрын
I remember when the I used to see the pacers almost every day, and I could hear them from my classroom, almost 2 miles away. And that was only 3 years ago, and the only reason I stopped hearing them is because I moved to a new school. I can credit Pacers for not putting me off railranning, but instead fuelling my passion for trains. Long live the Pacer.
@jollyjohnthepirate31682 жыл бұрын
Regarding the AA 20. Nothing says Soviet Union like " we will show the decadent western capitalists. We build biggest steam engine in World. What does it work,,,,,,that not important. The dictatorship of the proletariat will crush them."
@HistoryintheDark2 жыл бұрын
"Come, comrades! Listen to the sheer steaming power of socialist might and watch it go nowhere!"
@BazilRat2 жыл бұрын
Half the reason BR are on both the 'best' and 'worst' lists is... well, there were made *so damn many* different types of train made here in the UK.
@Xalerdane2 жыл бұрын
I heard it was because some imbecile decided that the number of diesel locomotive models had to match the number of steam engine models. _Despite, y’know, the fact that most of those were from before BR even fucking existed, when every railway was privately owned and designed its own rolling stock, which isn’t a factor when you’re both the only player in town and switching to a technology with radically different designing parameters._
@BazilRat2 жыл бұрын
@@Xalerdane Would make sense, considering the stupidness of BR at times.
@Foxstar13872 жыл бұрын
Both BR and BL would screw themselves over out of incompetence and over reaching. Even the simple things got made into a complex mess
@BazilRat2 жыл бұрын
@@Foxstar1387 But at the same time, both of them made/commissioned some truly amazing vehicles.
@Foxstar13872 жыл бұрын
@BazilRat yup. The potential was there for both to becone total powerhouses in their given sectors.(possibly even globally) But failed to realise that potential.
@mrmoviemanic15 ай бұрын
So this is why Diesels are the more villainous engines in Thomas the tank Engine.
@laszlokaestner57662 жыл бұрын
The reason for the Leaders box like shape was not to mimic the trend for diesels and electrics it was so that it would fit through the carriage washers of the Southern Railway the idea being this would save on the cost of cleaning the thing.
@BotLiquor2 жыл бұрын
So there's a Berkshire from the B&M, it had Big Boy numbering, T-1 classification, and a bad trailing truck. I don't know if you want to talk about it because no one should go insane over bad engines, but it did exist, and it's shaped rather strangley.
@NW2174Fan2 жыл бұрын
He already did, in Part 4 I believe
@billymcmedic4221 Жыл бұрын
6:06 the beginning of a wonderful relationship
@emeraldzebra93602 жыл бұрын
The Pacer was one of the best trains on my local lines up in the Pennines, they consistently did their job, you got exactly what you expected, and they were really great fun! Plus there is not & never will there be again ANY train on UK rails that gave as good of a panoramic view of the incredibly scenic area I live as you commuted.
@spacecase132 жыл бұрын
I was just here, again. Glad to note that this is a re-upload, I thought this was ep. 11 that somehow sounds like ep. 1. I shall uncross my eyes now.
@steelblue82 жыл бұрын
I reckon you'd absolutely LOVE the 4-4-6 Thuile locomotive. Originally proposed as a *6-4-8 with 3 metre driving wheels*, it was instead built as a 4-4-6 with 2.5m drivers. The huge drivers meant that the boiler had a cross section shaped like a peanut (bad because uneven pressure dispersion), this thing had 2 cabs- one at the front for the engineer and one at the back for the fireman and breakman, meaning no communication between the two was possible. It probably would have ended in disaster, except the trials for it were stopped because the guy who invented it leant out the side, slammed into a lineside pole and died
@alexhajnal107 Жыл бұрын
The original design also had the driving wheel axles going *through* the boiler. The as-built design is slightly saner. 🇫🇷❤
@SiqueScarface2 жыл бұрын
Railbuses were a thing in the after WWII in many countries, sometimes even before WWII. France for instance introduced railbuses already in the early 1930ies, like the X 5700. After the war, you got the likes of the X 3800 and the X 5600. Germany put the VT-series on rails (most famous the VT95), and East Germany had a similar design running as VT 2.09. Because they were mainly used on rural relations, they had nicknames like "Ferkeltaxe" (piglet cab). As you said: They were cheap to build, cheap to operate and replaced the old tank engine pulled trains on relations which were too small to operate with full trains or DMUs.
@cbolanz1 Жыл бұрын
Listening to this guy suffer in agony over British rail is hilarious.
@jonathansanger8622 жыл бұрын
The Pacers were often quoted in numerous past magazine articles and books as being cheap to run and saved many branch lines from closure. This is now usually misleading according to one more recent article written by one engineer whom has worked on them. Coupled with their costly introduction, they costed a lot more to run and maintain than the Sprinter type trains in view of the longevity of components concerned and they did not save branch lines from closure.
@badkittynomilktonight33342 жыл бұрын
#3 the Crampton layout was crazy popular in France and lasted clear into the turn of the century on high speed express locomotives.
@abrr20002 жыл бұрын
unfortunately, the energy efficiency of a steam train compared to modern motive powers is woeful. The only advantage of a steam train today is that it can use renewable fuels (wood) that also don't add Co2 to the carbon cycle. Unfortunately, this can also be achieved with eletric locos as well.
@wesbrackmanthercenthusiast46952 жыл бұрын
And that is exactly why mackwell locomotive in New Zealand is working on a steam system for locomotives and tractors
@Pdstor2 жыл бұрын
Lots of steampunkers out there who love trains, too. There's massive overlapping with a community of siren lovers, which has BIG overlap with ... us, the stormchasing community. The nerdiest community I've ever seen has been the city bus community. They also knew the most obscure, trivial things right off the bat that I've seen out of ANY community - there are busses out there with service records that may as well be Medal of Honor-laden military careers from what they say.
@TheBrightSkittle Жыл бұрын
What’s the music for the pacer train segment
@the_autism_express2 жыл бұрын
0:21 Hitd: **says liking trains isn't something to be proud of** Me: that's false That's the comment I posted on the original upload Haha reference go *AAAAAAAAAAAA-*
@silvertamman32182 жыл бұрын
"Listen to that horn!" Funny as hell.
@ElliotSpencer-q9h4 ай бұрын
The reason the Pacers were finally withdrawn was because, a change in the law required them to be fitted with disabled accessible toilets which would have cost £16,000 per vehicle. As they were close to the end of their working life, the expense could not be justified. There are several preserved on heritage railways and some converted to other uses.
@305ayeee2 жыл бұрын
In the case of the pacer trains... Ain't nothing more permanent than a temporary solution
@amtrakproductions-mx9ib Жыл бұрын
First time british rail appeared in a list
@alexhajnal107 Жыл бұрын
01:53 Philadelphia ran Pacers too! (SEPTA)
@Jack-hg1hq2 жыл бұрын
people in the north of england are starved of wealth while everyone in london is obscenely rich. this is why there's no budget to have nice trains
@caydencat58232 жыл бұрын
I was so confused at first then saw the description
@stevenplyler63062 жыл бұрын
Something about the back round music you played in the video talking about the failed British rail designs is probably the same music that the Dursley's played at Vernon and Petunia's wedding and continued to play during their leisure time as well !
@Mariazellerbahn2 жыл бұрын
3:50 The GM Aerotrain was ALSO made up from GM bus bodies on a 4 wheel freight chassis.
@alexhajnal107 Жыл бұрын
Its riding characteristics were much the same.
@Trainboy172 жыл бұрын
The curse where British Railways never leave your list
@ItsDaJax Жыл бұрын
Gods damn the way that Pacer moved reminded me of the articulated busses that UPS Worldport used to transport us employees around. These weren't transit busses mind you, imagine something like an airport/party bus pulling another one with the front end lopped off with a coupler like... well probably the Pacers.
@Techno-Universal2 жыл бұрын
6:03 Somehow the body design very closely resembles a locomotive designed to run on deep level tube lines in London! :)
@hypergolic84682 жыл бұрын
The Pacer, actually comes from an very advanced bit of design. In the 1960's in the UK there was a realisation that the work started pre War by the London Midland & Scottish (LMS) and London North Eastern Railway (LNER) in a joint facility at Derby (it had a wind tunnel in the 1930's) had pointed the direction to science and theoretical application of science on the railway. The UK had started to introduce continuous welded track, but in doing so had experienced a sharp rise in derailments. One type of cement wagon ("Testrol") was becoming well known for this, and throw in a couple of serious accidents, a scientific investigation was launched. In the end it was found that traditional jointed rail damped the hunting osculation of wheels on track, which up to that point was a poorly understood problem (the Japanese were starting to experience it with the Bullet train and developed a cone profile wheel). To cut a long story short, in rail engineering, the ideal solution is a wagon/coach with four wheels, 2 sets at either end, that's cheap on cost to build and cheap for maintenance and hopefully track life. If a high Speed Freight Wagon could be built that also had only four wheels and could travel at a 140mph then this was ideal. In the UK, research modelling at Derby (by now the Railway Technical Centre) led to HSF1 - High Speed Freight Vehicle 1. On a test rig it reach a 140mph, and most importantly, proved that the new theory of track to wheel relationship was correct and that the "worn wheel profile" stopped the hunting oscillation which led to derailments. At the same time the UK was involved with building the tilting Advance Passenger Train (APT), and the work with this knowledge on wheel profiles was to be used in the bogie design. One of the APT stipulations was no flange contact with the rail on a corner! For a whole host of reasons the freight market ended up pursuing other options, and the APT ended up on another trajectory, and the work, whilst critical went no further..... Until someone was looking for a way to keep rail lines open in the late 70's early 80's. By applying the design principles of HSF1, as as I understand it, drawing on some features very heavily, and the bus design, a low cost train could be put on the track with **acceptable** ride behaviour. I rode on Pacers for 10 years, they are hideous and horrible, but, and this is the point, they could keep close to line speeds on busy routes (Leeds to Doncaster / Leeds to York / Trans Pennine - extremities and core) so paths still existed for fast trains and they could do commuter traffic. They kept rural stations open, and many lines survived because of them, we should never forget that. But at the core of the idea was a four wheel high speed wagon design, may be the addition of cardian shafts, engines etc prevented the ride quality that they maybe should have had. The Sprinter family that came on behind (mostly a modified High Speed Train MK3 coach) with Bogies, were far better and it has to be said, are missed.
@HFStuart2 жыл бұрын
Genuinely fascinating, thanks. Agree the 150 /155 / 156 sprinters deserve to be on a 'best of' list. They are a bit tired now but were revolutionary in the 80's.
@GDGRailway477122 жыл бұрын
Not many people are so balanced on the subject of Pacers. It all seems to be mostly hate when they are mentioned. So, thank you for putting the history and a balanced view forward.
@ItsDaJax Жыл бұрын
I don't think the Pacer is ugly, but I do like busses, so my opinion is probably biased.
@slatecollins22542 жыл бұрын
Love your vids
@BrokenIET2 жыл бұрын
The leader was made by Southern Railway, and Oliver Bulleid's name is pronounced "bullied", deservedly, in a way, just as its Bulleid's Leader, probably should've been "Bully me leader" tho ngl. I've heard them described as "A London Underground battery loco on steroid, jacked up on bricks"
@wesbrackmanthercenthusiast46952 жыл бұрын
11:50 you really need to talk to mackwell locomotive in New Zealand he is developing a modern steam system for locomotives and now because of the great sickness farm tractors but he isn't going to get very far if we don't help him
@DaSpecialZak2 жыл бұрын
In my opinion they should of made the aa20 a 4-6-8-4, 4 steering wheels, 6 driving wheels with a gap and another 8 driving wheels then 4 trailing wheels which would of been much easier
@NW2174Fan2 жыл бұрын
Maybe they could've used to make a prototype for the P38's, which were 2-8-8-4 Yellowstones. They were built in the 1950's when it was obviously still around
@dylanwhite33832 жыл бұрын
We need to have more wooden trains that are more like some of the trains in these lists
@paulnicoll17912 жыл бұрын
The pacer was based on bus body panels ie the Leyland national. Being 4 wheel long wheelbase chassis they were referred to as "nodding donkeys"
@mattthesedg42382 жыл бұрын
Pacer trains and similar types on the west coast line in the lake district are aptly named 'West Coast Boneshaker'
@laserhawk642 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile I'm sitting here in a tiny town in the rural part of an upper Southeastern US state and wishing for something as nice as a Pacer. Public transit here is so bad it's literally unusable for me, and I can't drive and don't have friends to drive me. Being Disabled and 'needy' is a good way to not have friends BTW.
@dr.toxicgamingmadscientist8 ай бұрын
The Wonder Engine. It's a wonder how this engine even existed in the first place despite BR's lack of competence.
@Dulaman1072 жыл бұрын
I hear you like the idea of a modern steam engine. Boy, do I have an idea for you. Induction heated, partially computer controlled steam engines
@philrisbridger919 Жыл бұрын
Without the Pacer, a lot of rural passenger services would have stopped
@DeetexSeraphine Жыл бұрын
The 10800 reminds me a lot of the Dutch class 1000, aka Crippled Mary. They even share some looks
@tommcglone28677 ай бұрын
Oliver Bulleid was a maverick. But for every disaster like The Leader, there was a masterpiece like the West Country's, Merchant Navy's, Battle of Britain's and probably his best the mighty Breadloaf the Q1. The Q1 was (im not 100% on this) the most powerful 0-6-0 EVER to enter service. And despite its unfortunate looks, i mean the boiler casing is practically shaped like a loaf of bread, it was successful. Glad one of the Q1s got preserved
@Alcorob2 жыл бұрын
None of them were under water?
@stekra31592 жыл бұрын
They also had the bigest rocket in the world for a time
@michaelriley73952 жыл бұрын
10800 was subsequently purchased by Brush Electrical Engineering and became the testbed for the first asynchronous locomotive.
@northstar19502 жыл бұрын
They arnt trains, they are locomotives. Trains are what they pull.
@wdd68642 жыл бұрын
Did you ever look up the Baldwin Centipede? They had a bad reputation
@NW2174Fan2 жыл бұрын
Yes, it was on the latest installment (which as far as I know is Part 12)
@KevintheGreat125 Жыл бұрын
What Music Did You Use When You Were Talking About the Leader?
@Tyme_Whyrlwynd2 ай бұрын
This is where it all began.
@mark313342 жыл бұрын
Loving the video
@DOTD-Ko73822 жыл бұрын
WE THREW THE TEA IN THE HARBOR, BUT IT WAS 200 YEARS AGO
@AustinLineKJB2 жыл бұрын
8:18 For the Liter locomotive (didnt catch spelling), the designer should've just made a classic-style steam locomotive design, then built a box car around it. It probably would've performed better, and would not have the safety hazards you mentioned, not to mention being much more cost effective.
@amogusisntfunny1464 Жыл бұрын
Where did you get the footage of the Leader class motive systems from?
@SouRwy4501Productions Жыл бұрын
I don’t know why, but the 10800 looks like a weird ALCo diesel.
@Bungle-UK2 жыл бұрын
I always quite enjoyed riding a pacer, you never had a dull ride. They were also incredibly reliable workhorses.
@lorumipsum1129 Жыл бұрын
What’s the tune that plays during the leaders segment?
@arkie74 Жыл бұрын
the pacers probably rode on track that was effected by deferred maintenance. lol judging by the condition of the cars. they are nasty.
@jiarongxie59543 ай бұрын
SR Leader Class: Emotional Damage
@DrFruikenstein11 ай бұрын
Did they use hot bulb diesels in the 10800?😂🤣😂🤣 That would explain the wonder if it'll go thinking of the crews. The 6-2-0 looks like something I've seen in a cartoon.
@johnhood3172 Жыл бұрын
The leader looks like an London tube train on the top half .
@stelerElk2 жыл бұрын
I knew what the leader was as soon as I saw it because i drove one in a game i play once in a while
@flickcentergaming6807 ай бұрын
So the AA20-1 was basically Henry in his first shape but on steroids.
@wolfie773 Жыл бұрын
Idk about anyone else but i live in Britain and from these videos make me question some of br locomotives
@budwhite9591 Жыл бұрын
9:00. Safety in those days. Lol. OSHA? Who’s that? Sounds like the new Chinese guy
@joshuaW56212 жыл бұрын
Bullied soon made a similar locomotive in Ireland called Turf Burner.
@True_NOON Жыл бұрын
What a blast from the past, intresting to see how his mic and intro changed, but not his mood while filming 😁
@Coarstan6 ай бұрын
Living in Weston the ere is a rail way next to my bedroom and not far from me the train station runs and there has only been like 4-8 engines I have seen property running and doing a job on the rail way
@gfletcher61832 жыл бұрын
Pacer Train - I enjoyed working them, I signed from 2008-2020, I can tell you the ride could be interesting and the rear cab ride wasnt any better The bus seat sets were considered "westy" sets the Yorkshire sets had 2x2 sat configs which were better
@invisibleman48272 жыл бұрын
You're not picking on us, BR was in fact that bad.
@Foxstar13872 жыл бұрын
and is being resurrected in the guise of GBR Great British Railways.
@invisibleman48272 жыл бұрын
@@Foxstar1387 Dammit you're right! 🤦♂️
@s.p.d.magentaranger18222 жыл бұрын
@@Foxstar1387 So you're saying they're like the Simpsons in that they refuse to die?
@Foxstar13872 жыл бұрын
@s.p.d.magentaranger1822 pretty much. Though the new BR as GBR. Is a totally new entity. With nothing to do with the old BR. As the bulk of the operations will be done mostly by contracted companies. GBR will be like the host or government department-branch.
@s.p.d.magentaranger18222 жыл бұрын
@@Foxstar1387 I see. I just saw an opportunity for a funny joke.
@terenfro1975 Жыл бұрын
I rode a pacer. I thought it was because their rail system was just poorly maintained.
@SMichaelDeHart2 жыл бұрын
At 11:29 did you say four "Training" wheels?? I always thought they're calling "Trailing"!! However, for the Russkis maybe that's what they did call them, lol.
@liamcollinson56952 жыл бұрын
I live in the UK used to go quiet regular to Leeds on the train one time I had to ride this pacer tracer train home that honestly was older than I was they was a awful draft and no toilet it was horrible and almost put me of trains for life. I got charged the same price as well
@mikewolf72882 жыл бұрын
So is the SR Leader Class basically like if British Railways sucked at trying to develop their own SP Cab Forward?
@RodrigoSousaFerrovias2 жыл бұрын
Excellent vídeo my friend ! Greetings from Brazil.
@davidmoorman2468 Жыл бұрын
In the States we never refer to a "locomotive" as a "train". Is this common word usage in the UK?
@sgthree2 жыл бұрын
How many times have you included Pacers now? They seem to feature on all these videos.
@HexAyed2 жыл бұрын
Worse trains on Earth apparently. According to the American... who has never ridden them.... or their replacements....
@CrisisHedgehog2 жыл бұрын
@@HexAyed You’re saying... *That the trains made to replace* the fucking Buses on train van axles... *Are somehow worse than the buses...*
@HexAyed2 жыл бұрын
@@CrisisHedgehog No, they were perfectly serviceable and extremely reliable
@bleeksbentbits31502 жыл бұрын
I HAVE ridden on a train that bounces & bounds long worse than the BR 'Pacer' that is still (for now) in every day service.. Personally, I would be looking more at the piss-poor condition of the Mid-North Coast line in New South Wales. The train in question is the soon to be discontinued XPT based on the BR designed Intercity 125 High Speed Train, which has previously featured in another of your clips (Best trains you've never heard of?) Which brings me to- THANK YOU! First time commenting on your channel but been watching for a couple of weeks now... Found you thanks to a thumbnail featuring a NSWGR C38- not one of my favouritest of that fleet, but have been pleasently surprised to find a few of our Aussie loco's featured now! Thanks again! Tips/my opinion on locos; NSWGR C30 (NOT the 'T') & SMR10 class are the best looking tank locos ever to my eye. Garratt's are better AND more sensible than Mallett's & while it may not be pinicle of Garratt's- you've gotta go a LONG way to beat an AD60++ (NSWGR again! :v ) The prettiest Garratt, besides the original K1 & K2, would have to be the 8cylinder TGR double Atlantic M class of 1912... Oh, & Cli-Shay's are better than both Shay's & Climax's!
@KBJade392 жыл бұрын
I wish they hadnt scrapped the AA20 Something that fekin big was begging to be in a museum for just the shock value.
@lelandnanny967 Жыл бұрын
Four "training" wheels? I guess you could call them that.
@apexqc04 Жыл бұрын
The 10800 was better and more reliable than the class 15 and 16 locos which followed it. And the pacers were amongst the better trains when they first came out. Great for short journeys. I will miss them now they are gone... bus seats ana all.
@marcopolanco6398 Жыл бұрын
Nice research!
@crabby76682 жыл бұрын
Nice video of the leader
@dalekinthewater47082 жыл бұрын
What about the CoBos?
@HexAyed2 жыл бұрын
Class 28s were successful locomotives with teething problems with the Crossley engines, far from the "WORST TRAINS EVER"
@dalekinthewater47082 жыл бұрын
@@HexAyed but bad in design. I mean three in front and two at back? Not efficient
@HexAyed2 жыл бұрын
Actually it was, the Co-Bo was alot more powerful than the other locos in its classification due to the CoBo set up
@calvingreene902 жыл бұрын
Once Stalin died it was safe to say it was a bad idea.
@seeroger52 жыл бұрын
Did you reupload
@andrewwatkins48522 жыл бұрын
I have a suggestion for the next entry Br class 40 or d-261 nicknamed bowler
@Tek_7772 жыл бұрын
Serious question, what is the biggest train ever made if it is not the AA-20? I’ve heard of the 9000 class and S-1 so I’m really curious how they all compare to each other. Also, how is that measured? Wheel setup, tractive power, length and width, weight? I’m new to this so forgive me if it’s a silly question. Cheers!
@kimpatz21892 жыл бұрын
The triplex design defeats everyone in length and tractive effort.
@Transportationspotting2 жыл бұрын
Bullied is pronounced bull-id If someone British was doing this, the Pacers would be at number 1…
@LordoftheBadgers2 жыл бұрын
You sure? I was chatting online to his grandson who told me it was bull-eed
@Andrewjg_892 жыл бұрын
Not all British built trains and locomotives aren’t as bad or worse. But some do have such weird appearance. Interesting video.
@derpmaniak78232 жыл бұрын
Zillertalbahn. Change my mind
@JBofBrisbane2 жыл бұрын
Wuppertal.
@PreciousAlpschindler2 жыл бұрын
Wow I bet the Pacer shakes more than any Burmese train ride
@ZeldaTheSwordsman2 жыл бұрын
The Leader could probably be pulled off with modern metallurgy and machining
@tyler_bt3326 Жыл бұрын
I want a billionaire with more money than sense to make it happen. Oil fired so you aren’t cooking a fireman every trip, modern boiler efficiency. It would be a monster
@bertmeinders67582 жыл бұрын
The Pacers are a good example of the trap of "Make it Cheap!" GM gave up making cars in Europe after a succession of American general managers at Luton and Rüsselsheim competed with their predecessors in cost-cutting. Vauxhalls after about 1970 were crap (I had a Chevette) and Opels after about 1985. The Ural was touted in the 1970s as a Bargain BMW (After owning one of these Russian abominations briefly, I now ride real BMWs. No comparison!). On rails, the NZR rebuilt G class was crippled by no one being paid to sort out the blastpipe/funnel proportions, so that in service they had to be thrashed to get enough draught to steam well, and this exacerbated weaknesses in the frames and cylinders.
@calvingreene902 жыл бұрын
This can't be the five worst locomotives or self-powered trans they're not all diesels.
@schudder16232 жыл бұрын
isn't that the first episode?
@HistoryintheDark2 жыл бұрын
Yes. I had to edit and reupload due to a copyright strike.
@MCZGStudio2 жыл бұрын
Yes it is cause BR Pacers didnt like it
@davidty20062 жыл бұрын
@@MCZGStudio I think it was northern who didn't like it. They are known for operating them.