5 Spots where Poker Theory DOESN'T MATTER | FT. Marc Goone

[@hungryhorsepoker]

thanks for having me! was super fun!

[@1312Mork2]

appreciate you

[@boba7709]

greatest colab ever. Looking forward to mr carrot showing up on the hungry horse channel

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

My pleasure, Hungry Horse. It was a lot of fun.

[@330miggs]

15" POKER HAAAAARRRRDDD

[@hungryhorsepoker]

@@330miggs omg

[@leehjones]

These two worlds colliding is the single best thing to happen to poker since the four color deck. Also, massive shout out to Pete for gently needling Mark about saying "Raise off". He can't help it - he learned it feom Bart. But yeah, brilliant stuff and I hope you two will do more alliteratively amazing combined content.

[@jamesrigby7132]

My two favourite poker youtube channels coming together. Great to see. Brilliant content.

[@elliottpanyi2874]

The best poker video I’ve watched in a long long time. This is the thought process you need to be the best poker player possible in 2024

[@ashleyowens5231]

So cool to see Marc in the carrot corner! Love you both!

[@MichaelVassolo]

As a student of Carrot, I've been secretly watching @hungryhorsepoker. I had a feeling this meeting of the minds would happen. Good stuff.

[@mzockt]

I live in a simulation. Love to watch both channels. Out of nowhere hungry horse on Carrots. Love it

[@susymay7831]

Exploit ideas ⭐ Don't three bet polar from OOP and bigger sizes are ok. ⭐ Can range bet even bad boards vs weak players. ⭐ What node is this opponent worse at: facing cbets or facing flop checks? Then place out hands in the best nodes. ⭐ Small river sizes IP for value vs passive can be used. ⭐ Small river IP to induce spaz players can be used. ⭐ River Bluff line that is often good: Big, Big Small. Big, Big, Big is not a good MDA bluff line. ⭐ Don't protect our checking range if our opponent under bluffs. Use smaller sizes if they over fold. ⭐ Hand vs range is the way to think, and think about how they will play their range. ⭐ Don't weigh blockers much vs poor players.

[@vitrous2]

The crossover episode I didn’t know I needed

[@hansvondincklage4264]

So awesome to see you guys together. I fairly recently discovered Mark, been a longer fan/customer of Pete but I love the way both you guys think about poker. Still in the first 3 min but I'm sure this will be awesome. Pete if you ever get Doug Polk on I will send you a picture of me bowing down in front of a carrot.

[@pokersoftwarereviews5051]

Really enjoyed the commentary about Big-Big-Small betting patterns.

[@PseudoAccurate]

Awesome guest. Been watching a lot of hungry horse content lately and I really enjoy the way he explains concepts.

[@MultiChaim]

great great value vid !! you 2 are a super power combo !!! luv it !! thx a lot for the upload ;)

[@JWINPoker]

Great video, loads of value. Thanks guys.

[@StreetSoulLover]

Oh yeah! This is the one I have been waiting for! Gotta love a bit of Squish!

[@broganlee88]

Dangling the Carrot in front of the Hungry Horse 🥕🐴

[@geovaniraffaelli4508]

nice

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

You can lead a hungry horse to a carrot but you can't make it chomp.

[@chadharris705]

Big fan of Pete, even tho a lot of solver nerd nit regs don't like him. Thinks about poker a lot like you, Marc. Superb video.

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

Those solver nit regs are LOSERS

[@karlmason7985]

Was always going to happen. Hungry Horse poker is insanely good.

[@karlmason7985]

Can't believe I posted before I watched the video. We all know which flop was coming. Look at that sweet baby there.

[@paulthepolarbear9914]

I love the casual poker school war around 10:00 😂

[@horn2102]

The crossover we been waiting on

[@tolkien11]

This video was amazing!

[@GokuTheSuperSaiyan1]

22:56 - 23:29 I definitely agree and am following a lot of you're what saying. The point about comparing whats real to whats imaginary is a good one. But for the point you made afterwards, the thing to bare in mind is whether you have to have an accurate model of what the person will do in order for these exploitative lines to work. I think a lot of these arguments between "GTO people" or "anti GTO people" (nobody is actually anti-GTO, thats just how the labels have been given to different groups of people) happen because there is the ambiguous space of having an accurate model of what the other person will do, wondering if the other person will catch on or out-think the exploit you've set up, because if they do catch on then the model is no longer true.

[@toddfromwork8931]

I'm new here. I'm a Hungry Horse stan.

[@ekw555]

@21:48 - A3 clubs rivered a straight. but I know what you meant. 😀

[@330miggs]

15" POKER HAAAAARRRRDDD

[@AFKxMUSIC]

Hey any tips for tournament poker in person ($100-$250 buy in range) Or for tips on gg poker ontarios $50 Sunday tournament. Any exploits?

[@ledermaj123]

I'm a big fan of this collab.

[@Mat-oh3xe]

In the Q9 3bet hand you said btn should bet all the missed draws like JTs, KTs and all the missed spades. I thought that solvers didn't like to bluff with the missed flop FD, on top of that you also block the straight draws, can you please give some tips on when it is correct to bluff river with the missed flop flush draw? Thank you

[@hungryhorsepoker]

in this scenario since button is PFC and has called flop + turn, the ONLY hands he gets to river with without sdv are generally missed flush draws. therefore, if he doesnt bluff these he doesn't have any bluffs. but in reality, people think "omg i can't bluff a missed flush draw" and sometimes x back, which is why this spot is a *mandatory* bet from oop with top 2, because IP doesn't bluff enough!

[@Mat-oh3xe]

@@hungryhorsepoker Thank you

[@MrTata1000]

Pete "True EV" strategy >>>>> Marc "Bet half to see where you at" strategy.

[@brenneisenchevy981]

Pretty sure a3 of clubs not only blocks some of there calling range it aswell beats their whole calling range 😃

[@hungryhorsepoker]

straights, they are hard!

[@RonZucker]

Now I know the world is ending. My two favorite poker thinkers in the same video? I think I need a cigarette. (Still want to play bridge with you on BBO, Pete.)

[@stephen7604]

Wow insane crossover

[@eddiemcalinden2773]

A Jockenese poker vlogger, where in the name e Gawd have ye been aw ma life Big Yin , sorry I'm late , but I'm in noo !

[@maxjepson3211]

Look at that sweet baby there.

[@brewdir]

omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg I'm so excited

[@brewdir]

J92 makes an appearance thank god

[@ThuTran-uo5ob]

Doug Polk would not approve this video

[@dankra01]

I'm scared of how the video ends, since hungry horses eat carrots :(

[@colindickson6099]

WORLDS COLLIDING

[@criostasi]

Supersuper video.

[@VanCraic]

Still, I don't deserve to leave this comment

[@tobyfitzpatrick3914]

Couldn't understand much, so thanks for teaching me that Poker just ain't for me. You've saved me a ton of money... (Part of being smart is knowing what you're dumb at). 😊

[@JazzYachtrocker]

🐴 🥕

[@karmababy5077]

Sorry, but in that first Big blind defense versus button chart at 3.25; the range is surely far too wide there. There is no way that 23o, A2o, 82s etc are pure calls in theory or in practice. It's a great video by the way. Lots a great stuff in there. I just don't understand why range is so wide there.

[@hungryhorsepoker]

ranges might look wide because these are solved for *no rake* vs 2.5x open. with no rake we can defend an incredibly wide range.

[@dsizzle49]

🤯🤯🤯🤯

[@DarrenJohn10X]

I hate this collab. 🤜🤛 Poker games just got tougher...

[@ryanonvr2267]

so, he says 3% changes everything. So what about...RAKE?!?!?! If you can't account for every variable, how valuable is the solver? hint: a tool for thought and nothing more.

[@Lyqu1d]

Woah, Avengers Assemble

[@scunny]

Did this guy just learn the word Equilibrium?

[@genesises]

last

[@zero_zero107]

i think he should change the name to Marc Gooning

[@Jacobson-dp7gg]

Who is this waffler

[@jdstoltz3407]

Oh man, I feel like hungryhorsepoker is such a grift. He's nothing but a course merchant - an average winning player with no new insight to the game or innovative coaching methods. From the YT shorts and IG reels containing some of the most horrendous plays you've ever seen (with good single hand results for clickbait of course) to the claim that you can make $100/hr at the live low stakes - this guy sucks.

[@enijize1234]

A lot of people say similar stuff about Pete. I keep watching his videos because his data is insane

[@jdstoltz3407]

@@enijize1234 Pete doesn't sensationalize about earning potential nor does he make clickbait short form content. He also at one point made a living from playing online poker, something Marc Goone has never done or claimed to do. That already puts him miles ahead in terms of knowledge and skill of someone "crushing" live low stakes and soft stream games.

[@PseudoAccurate]

Obviously Pete respects his thought process or he wouldn't have him on.

[@hughdesmond2006]

Keep whinging and moaning about free content

[@superuser6699-l1o]

He also learned the word 'equilibrium' yesterday!

[@ten4267]

Please delete this video

[@Rl5293-z4t]

I disagree on the big blind 3bet exploit. The reason solver wants to 3bet polar the big blind is that he doesn t want to have a super weak calling range. You don t have to be linus to notice that the bb calling range is super weak and you can overbluff like crazy postflop when bb is just flatting ( if he doesnt 3bet polar preflop)