What is a lens you keep getting recommended but when you actually got it, you were kinda disappointed? 😔 Capture One Pro - 65% OFF! geni.us/bXP1c FREE Filmmaking Course: www.jasonvong.com/freefilmcourse
@withoutpassid5 жыл бұрын
Jason Vong Sony Zeiss 24 1.8. Lacking OSS is a pain for my shaky hand, when it is paired with my a6300. I ended up using the 16-70 a lot more, even in low light.
@HueyPProductions5 жыл бұрын
Sigma 18-35 1.8 nobody every told me that thing is heavy
@mr.whoneedsit78565 жыл бұрын
Hey Jason how come students always get the discounts? What about us broke as f parents who pay for their kids college etc etc lol
@JasonVong5 жыл бұрын
@@HueyPProductions YEP! It's heavy hahaha!
@JasonVong5 жыл бұрын
@@mr.whoneedsit7856 Use your kids student ID to apply 😂😂😂
@myk3al15 жыл бұрын
"Moral of the story is GET A FULL FRAME CAMERA" LMAO I fell out of my chair 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@reddawn874 жыл бұрын
Welp I followed what he said LOL
@mich7224 жыл бұрын
And pay the price of a car.
@lugaidster4 жыл бұрын
@@mich722 you can get a full frame a7ii for around $600 used. That's right there with APS-C cameras and has IBIS.
@jeepjoseph90364 жыл бұрын
@@mich722 no that's hasselblad and medium format Leica
@bokbokeh5 жыл бұрын
This should be a series for beginners! “You’re doing it Vong!”
@TJuice19864 жыл бұрын
What the hell is “Vong” with you?
@XRP_3214 жыл бұрын
im the 100th like
@jklphoto4 жыл бұрын
A funnier, and actually educational series, could be called Vong is Wong!
@jeroenjansen27094 жыл бұрын
Sum Ting Vong
@kiyoshim95934 жыл бұрын
he is misleading people with his video. People should stick to read the lens specifications. for example Sony50mm E 32° angle of view. Sigma50mm E 47° angle of view. Sony50mm FE 47° angle of view.
@meriredetripsandclicks31535 жыл бұрын
I use a 500mm on an apsc sensor and am very happy with it. My neighbor isn't though.
@greysuit175 жыл бұрын
Trips and Clicks 🙀
@JasonVong5 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a great investment! 😂😂
@charlespangilinan63515 жыл бұрын
Adapt it on a micro4/3! Then have fun!
@trym21215 жыл бұрын
Put it on M43 with 2x converter. You'll start seeing the shape of your neighbor voice
@blankname56125 жыл бұрын
500mm on aps c street photography are for chumps, 800mm f8 on m43 is where it's at.
@tvdlfilms5 жыл бұрын
OMG I thought Potato jet was you and vise versa for months now 😂😂😂 I’m so confused rn 🤷🏼♂️
@Ben-rz9cf5 жыл бұрын
racist
@Novice21215 жыл бұрын
@@Ben-rz9cf i made the same mistake and im Asian soooo
@swarovskivtx5 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 Me too! I had to search if it was true that they are different youtubers ahahahah
@bobcoco60474 жыл бұрын
@@Ben-rz9cf Racism is out of intention , being confused not. So this kind of accusation makes no actual sense. (besides the obvious joky character of the OP, which makes it even + inapropriate x) )
@habuddivsshere63374 жыл бұрын
me too..
@gabrielmaria27624 жыл бұрын
This has been an emotional carousel, being a beginner and having ordered the 50mm 1.8 for an apsc...
@poquerRafa4 жыл бұрын
That lens is just great. Amazing value for money. A great buy, dont worry. But in the begining might stand way closer than you have to
@gabrielmaria27624 жыл бұрын
@@poquerRafa I am totally doing that and the people i take portraits of were aware of that before me. Still correcting this. I love the lens till this day since it's on my camera daily. :) Thanks for the replies.
@Guuliann4 жыл бұрын
Don't worry, 50mm is great. I've used a 50 for 15yrs more than any lens for street and portrait work. It's a great focal length for composing and the restrictions make for better shots when you have to work through it.
@Guuliann4 жыл бұрын
Unless if you're not on fullframe... Lol I came from analog an never use cropped sensors
@gabrielmaria27624 жыл бұрын
@@Guuliann I'm on a crop, but I find the 50 (80mm when you factor in the crop) really nice for portraits. Looking to upgrade to FF soon tho. :)
@likelupiniii34665 жыл бұрын
I found the part about you not fully understanding crop sensors dope. Would love to see a video about your journey as a photographer from beginning to now. Like about your first camera, your first big break, your inspiration or what led to you becoming a photographer. I think it'd be dope.
@13lamjh15 жыл бұрын
whenever im about to forget, jv here brings out potatojet again🤣
@JasonVong5 жыл бұрын
damnmit! im perpetuating this stereotype!!
@GregoryAlusa5 жыл бұрын
Sigma 30mm f1.4 for my APSC SONY A6400🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼
@JasonVong5 жыл бұрын
our lord and savior for Sony APSC... SIGMA!!!
@WillProwse5 жыл бұрын
Sigma all the way with a6400. Best combo ever
@charlien41535 жыл бұрын
Sad that Sony doesnt make faster than 1.8 for APS-C and more sad that not stabilized
@JasonVong5 жыл бұрын
@@charlien4153 actually sony apsc 35mm and 50mm are OSS
@BigBoss-gb4cx5 жыл бұрын
@@charlien4153 They wouldn't be able to sell FF lens and cameras otherwise....
@chosenideahandle5 жыл бұрын
For portraits I like to still stick to a 56mm to 85mm f/1.4 or f 1.8 crop or not. Regardless of having to move back sometimes, the compression plus the large aperture are hard to beat when working together for separation. People can also start looking a little unnatural if you happen to get too close with those wider focal lengths.
@dallinski5 жыл бұрын
I'd like a tutorial showing start to finish of planning, filming, and editing a KZbin video.
@NickBarang5 жыл бұрын
I really hated my 50mm on a crop sensor, until I moved to a full-frame and it was awesome. Then, I went back to a crop and I love the 50 mm now. It's essentially the portrait lens that we all need. Terrible for street and general use, though. I like my 23 mm most for that.
@Assassunn2 жыл бұрын
Do you use a 23mm on APS-C ?
@lorraine61855 жыл бұрын
I agree Jason. The Sony APS-C Cameras are great! But, you do have to buy the lens that’s right for you.
@srapko5 жыл бұрын
Maybe more "what not to do as a beginner" videos
@johnmcard31164 жыл бұрын
This guy is a beginner. If you buy a lens designed for a cropped sensor the focal length marked will be accurate. Only when you mis-match a full-frame lens with a cropped sensor will you encounter problems.
@juspain15 жыл бұрын
Would have been nice to have this video when I started a year ago. But I love your humor and knowledge. Always talking about important stuff that we all need to be aware of. Thanks dude
@angelmusical704 жыл бұрын
85 on a APS-C, why not? The recommendation a portrait lens is 85mm to 135mm
@andrebauer7774 жыл бұрын
I think 85mm on APS-C is too much tele for many situations. The sigma 56mm 1.4 is smaller, faster and offers a good focal lenght I think.
@ChrisParayno4 жыл бұрын
Truth
@johnmcard31164 жыл бұрын
If the 85 lens is made for a cropped sensor, it will be an 85.
@andrebauer7774 жыл бұрын
WhatCheif Network: no. if the label says 85mm it is 85mm. and the field of view is like 120mm on an apsc.
@johnmcard31164 жыл бұрын
@@andrebauer777 Are you fucking kidding me?! My lens is DX. That means it's built for a cropped sensor. My camera is a cropped sensor. So if I put my cropped sensor lens on my cropped sensor body, what the fuck is the focal length?? OF COURSE ITS THE CORRECT FOCAL LENGTH, NO MULTIPLICATION. I can't believe how fuckin stupid people are
@ATMTech5 жыл бұрын
This is SO TRUE! People used to shout about how usable and versatile the 50mm focal length was but I found I never had enough space for me to back up and was only really good in wide open spaces or controlled environments. Having switched to a full frame years later, I now see what people were talking about! And properly understood that I was actually at a roughly 80mm focal length on my APSC!
@glacieractivity4 жыл бұрын
TIPS: If you have taken images on your kit-lense and you want to get a prime lens - your first job is to take your image library and sort it on focal length. Now - beginners have a tendency to use zooms either full wide or full long (depending on the kit-lense zoom range), so expect that most images are grouped around those two focal ranges. But also take note if a lot of images that you like are grouping around either 35 or 50 mm full-frame equivalent (23 or 35 mm APS-C). Then start to consider if the topics of such groupings vary (landscapes/arcitecture/friends around cafe-table typically group towards more 35 mm. More intimate street photography and portraits are probably grouping more around 50 mm equivalent as a rule of thumb). Now it is time to ask "why do I want a prime" while looking at your images. Do you like to get up close to the "action" while getting in some wider context as well? 35 mm is your first frame. Do you like to isolate people/subjects - the 50 mm is your friend (also because it will compress depth of field more and get you a blurrier background). When learning with a kit-lens we are usually not conscious about where we place the zoom-ring. But many will have an instinctive preference - indicating if one likes the wider look or the more closed in look. So trust your own catalogue of images. And remember, if you are getting a new lens and not a new sensor-size, one does not need to convert the millimetres. The only reason why we use 35 and 50 mm "equivalent" is that we grew up with pretty much only one "sensor" - 35mm film. Since the sensor on my Fuji is APS-C with 1.5 crop, it just means that 23 mm is equivalent to a 35 mm analogue camera/full-frame digital camera. Personally, I am leaning to 35 mm. But not totally. Because my first camera (for 10 years) had only one lens - a 40 mm 2.8. By shooting with that alone, the field of view became internalized. I did not really have to look through the viewfinder since I knew what the lens/camera/film was seeing. So I guess I can blame childhood for my "choice".
@jonathangordon7542 Жыл бұрын
This guy is giving terrible advice and the title is just click bait. A 50mm should absolutely be a first or second lens purchase, they are so versatile. 50mm on a full frame is an all around good focal length, it provides just enough compression to be used for portraits and is neither a wide or telephoto focal length. When used in on a crop sensor camera it is somewhere around 75 to 80mm's which is, you guessed it, perfect for close up portraits. Also, most beginning photographers want cheap, a nifty 50 is super cheap. If you wanted the aspect ratio of a 50mm on a crop sensor you are going to have to get a 30 or 35mm lens and those are expensive because you need more glass to make them, so it is cheaper to use a kit lens. However you should still get a 50mm, there are zero down sides to it. In the end get the lens you want and can afford, and BUY USED! I rarely buy new lenses, keep glass in circulation :)
@JQLee-cr5sk4 жыл бұрын
I was going crazy with my 85mm with my nikon d3400... only to know now that would have been a 127.5mm focal length!
@arshian34204 жыл бұрын
Bro please tell me how is the sharpness and autofocus?
@MyGroo4 жыл бұрын
50mm focal length on APS-C it *is* 50mm. The reason you multiply is because you want to see which focal length you would have to use on a 35mm camera to get the same result. It's like saying that 50mm on FF is actually 32mm on a Hasselblad.
@LordArioh5 жыл бұрын
I just got 50 f1.2.. damn, where have YT recommendations been..
@hyunji25244 жыл бұрын
Feel the same way
@kotazad31154 жыл бұрын
I've got a 50mm f1.4 first and I LOVE it to this day
@onQQuincy5 жыл бұрын
Actually when people say get a 50mm for a APS-C it's so that you will have a portrait lens that's more like having a 85mm lens on a full frame.
@BigBoss-gb4cx5 жыл бұрын
Except the less DFO.
@onQQuincy5 жыл бұрын
@@BigBoss-gb4cx That's why I said "more like" but it's the 56mm f/1.2 that will give you about the same look as a 85mm f/1.8 on a full frame camera
@JeremyCWW4 жыл бұрын
Totally agree with you
@trilexi4 жыл бұрын
So today I learned "Jason Vong" isn't "Potato Jet" 's secondary channel ... They aren't the same guy. Hope I'm not racist
@wasislos4 жыл бұрын
im asian myself and i got confused by 2 different videos about a7s3 (1 was from Potato Jet and second one was from Jason Vong and i got confused for a second before realizing that they were different people :) )
@explorewitharnav4 жыл бұрын
same same
@younggod49154 жыл бұрын
Glad I wasn’t the only one
@cactivation073 жыл бұрын
It is racist but atleast you didn't mean any harm from it at the start
@Deveraux1234564 жыл бұрын
Can you post the pictures of the models? For research purposes.
@EthanChlebowski5 жыл бұрын
Literally ordered the sony 50mm 1.8 last night...just changed my order to the sigma 30mm 1.4. I didn't know I needed this video, but Jason Vong did...what is this sorcery?
@alphaxfang5 жыл бұрын
do you have in body image stabilization? if not better get that sony 35mm 1.8 that OSS will help more than extra .4 aperture...
@EthanChlebowski5 жыл бұрын
alphaxfang No image stabilization! I have the 18-105 with oss for those cases. The Sigma lenses is primarily for photos and video work on a tripod only.
@alphaxfang5 жыл бұрын
@@EthanChlebowski well then that's a good choice for your set up... Ah and one thing to consider too... The bokeh ball, personally i don't like sigma bokeh ball... Kind of busy looking... But if it fit with your taste then go with that lens, it's one fast sharp lens for sure...
@EthanChlebowski5 жыл бұрын
@@alphaxfang Indeed, I'll keep an eye out for it. I mainly wanted the lens for the sharpness!
@EthanChlebowski5 жыл бұрын
Ta-Kuan Fuan That’s what I like to hear, I’m stoked!
@dlovisuals5 жыл бұрын
I remember when I first bought my Canon T3i people told me the same thing, get a 50mm. I got and was like “wtf it’s so zoomed in”. Now that I know what I’m doing, I enjoy it on crop cameras for that “portrait” look, though I do love my 40mm a little bit more lol
@JasonVong5 жыл бұрын
it only costed us $100 to realize our mistake 😂😂😂 much cheaper than going to college
@dlovisuals5 жыл бұрын
Jason Vong waaay cheaper than going to college. Could’ve bought a whole case of coffee instead haha
@TheNAK205 жыл бұрын
Please do a review of the sigma 16mm ,30mm and 56 with the a6400 on the FeiyuTech G6 Plus Gimbal PLEASE!
@vasilkosev9005 жыл бұрын
When I started photography I got a kit lens and 50mm and most of the time it was difficult to get the frame I want with the 50mm. Therefore I went to 35mm on a crop body and it felt perfect for portraits. As for what tutorials I would really want to see "how to pose a model"'. Keep making great videos!
@music3x35 жыл бұрын
have a 30mm 1.4 sigma on my canon 1100d, its wicked ! A bit expensive for a 2nd lens especially if you do it as a hobby and you're like 16 or so, but definetly worth !
@asankajayarathna48805 жыл бұрын
what is the best video lens for sony a7r3 ? is sony 16-35mm f2.8 gm best? but more expensive.. is there any other recommendations?
@Alex_Ochoa5 жыл бұрын
Another good zoom lens which isn't as wide as the 16-35 but is a great lens for the price is the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 👍
@eviem705 жыл бұрын
I still love my 50mm. I bought it for my t3i about 6 yrs ago. Still use it on my now 5dm4. Love the bokeh that’s always given me. I don’t regret buying it
@Ben-rz9cf5 жыл бұрын
It is honestly good on either. When i was out shooting in monkey forest in bali, i used my 50 1.4 on a crop sensor and it was actually the perfect focal length. Put enough distance between me and the monkeys that i wasn't scaring them off and still got some really creamy gorgeous bokeh, and some of the best shots of my career
@TheDanishSpaceman5 жыл бұрын
Great vid! Thanks :) The number on the lens is usually the “true” focal length (on on super zooms or compact cameras you many times will see the FF equiv. field of view. What you mean is that a 50mm lens on an APS-C body gives you a 75mm FF equivalent field of view. This point is that we use the FF equivalent field of view as a reference to compare the field of view on bodies with ither sensor sizes.
@kiyoshim95934 жыл бұрын
he is misleading people with his video. People should stick to read the lens specifications. for example Sony50mm E 32° angle of view. Sigma50mm E 47° angle of view. Sony50mm FE 47° angle of view.
@okaro659511 ай бұрын
@@kiyoshim9593 Nobody understands degrees.
@kiliandietrich85265 жыл бұрын
If they wrote anything else but the true value of the focal length on a lens... they would straight up lie. Because a 50mm lens always remains a 50mm lens. The glass is shaped to have it's focal point 50mm from the center of the principal plane. Full frame or not, what you mean is that the angle of view is different when you put different sensors behind the lens.
@spencerselover4 жыл бұрын
Long story short, A 50mm is the best starting focal distance for all-around shooting. Just know the crop factor of your camera, and what you want to shoot. If you're using a cropped APSC sensor, get a 35mm instead. If your focus is landscapes go about 1/2 that.
@okaro659511 ай бұрын
Actually 50 mm is too tight for indoor shooting. 35 mm is better as a general purpose lens.
@Alex-qd1un5 жыл бұрын
So? Sigma 30mm 1.4 or Sony 50 mm 1.8 ?😩
@quite1enough5 жыл бұрын
Marking aps-c lens with ff focal length rates just ridiculous, and I never understand that
@saifaldin_5 жыл бұрын
John Smith They’re not marked with full frame focal lengths, but the actual focal length of the lens (physical dimension which will not change). What people mean when they say ‘full frame equivalent’ is they’re referring to the FOV that you will get if you’re using FF cameras. So the marking in mm is always correct, only the FOV will change according to what sensor size it’s being paired with.
@quite1enough5 жыл бұрын
@@saifaldin_ what I meant is why you can't place notes on lens with mount which can be used only on aps-c bodies with ff equivalent, and how's that correct if aps-c lens marked as 50mm isn't gonna be 50mm , etc etc you know what I mean
@saifaldin_5 жыл бұрын
John Smith They can’t label it like that; that would be wrong. The only ways they can label it correctly are: A) Label with FL (in mm) which they are doing now) B) Label with FOV (in degs) in which case they would have to put both FF & APSC numbers for each lens. C) Put all of the above Sony uses the same mount for their FF and APS-C mirrorless bodies. So even though the lenses were designed for a particular sensor size, they can still be mounted & used on other sensor sized bodies. I understand that the current way of labeling in FL can be confusing, but I can’t imagine a better way to label them (unless you don’t mind super long names for each lens)
@davidanderson98924 жыл бұрын
The lens casts a projection onto the sensor. A FF lens casts a larger circle, but for a given focal length e.g. 50mm, the magnification remains the same. So lets say there's a dog in the centre of the image; in each case the dog is the same height on the sensor. There's no [sensor] focal length; there's just focal length. Because the FF lens needs to cast a larger circle than the APS-C lens to cover the larger sensor, the FF lens will usually be wider across. (modern lenses are more complicated internally than the basic single lens optics model which is used to designate their focal length).
@okaro659511 ай бұрын
There is no FF focal length or APS-C focal length. The lens has only its actual focal length which is not changed by the sensor size. You just should understand that with a smaller sensor one must use shorter focal lenghts. It seems that you have not understood this. I think you should first understand the basics, then you can use the crop factor and equivalences as tools. If you jump directly to them without understanding the basics you get confused.
@austinwenger63665 жыл бұрын
If the lenses are designed for an APSC camera like the a6500 or a6400, why would they still be mislabeled? Shouldn’t they list the true focal length if they are designed for that platform? And it not, then what’s the point of buying those if they are cropped anyway?
@JasonVong5 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't say it's mislabeled, I'm sure there's a reasoning behind. One that I haven't learned yet lol!
@rsmith025 жыл бұрын
The true focal length is the number written on them, period. The meaning of the number (how wide the field of view is) depends on the sensor/film size. Hence the confusion.
@austinwenger63665 жыл бұрын
rsmith02 i just think it would be easier for consumers to know which is which so you don’t have that confusion. You can’t scale up an APSC lens but you can scale down a full frame lens.
@sullinsshoots5 жыл бұрын
I'd really love to see more on event photography, low light situations, performance of arts as well as studio stuff.
@Mr.Deeds.5 жыл бұрын
85mm all day long! Great video!
@comichero5585 жыл бұрын
Where was this video when I bought my a6400 lol that was the first lens I bought after watching hours of KZbin .. then my son's kindergarten classroom graduation I was pushing myself against the wall for a shot 😂😂 Was going to say a macro extension vid should be next but guess your on it already , so how about some water photography tips since it's summer
@kannonfps4 жыл бұрын
i made the "mistake" to buy an 85mm on my 750D and boy the 130mm hit hard , BUT i actually find it pretty interesting it give an other perspective on what you are shooting although i would not recommend it either :') my 85 is a yongnuo , so the price is way cheaper than a canon or anything else so it wasnt too bad of a mistake :D
@sexysilversurfer4 жыл бұрын
Karma LOL I made the same mistake and my camera would often get the focus wrong!
@Ben-rz9cf5 жыл бұрын
50mm is almost always better on full frame. On a crop sensor, it's basically an 85. Not terrible for portraits still, but you're going to have to have a bit of space in your studio. I would recommend for everyone to get a 50mm AND a 35mm.... Both are really close to the human perceptual range of 42mm, but one is slightly telephoto and thus very flattering for facial features on portraits and the other is slightly wide angle and thus you're able to get really close to your subject and shoot a bunch of different stuff in tight spaces. I use the 2 of these primes for like, 90% of my photography.
@okaro659511 ай бұрын
That human perceptual range is pure nonsense. Human field if vision is over 180 degrees.
@guyjordan82013 жыл бұрын
The Internet's not my real dad
@AlexFung935 жыл бұрын
also keep in mind that each crop camera system can have a different crop factor. For instance, canon APS-C is usually 1.6x and Micro4/3 is usually 2x
@aight3655 жыл бұрын
Also keep in mind that Fuji cameras have a crop factor of x1.5 lol thanks for educating the public
@jonathan-rw3mx5 жыл бұрын
@@aight365 what?
@EvanNakagawa5 жыл бұрын
I love my 56mm on my a6300, but I don’t use it nearly as much as I thought I would. The majority of the time I use my 18-105
@Grr8jon4 жыл бұрын
Same, 18-105mm is just too good in a variety of situations. I use the sigma 16mm 1.4 for low light
@danielmarcussen7145 жыл бұрын
"5 tips when going freelance"
@muhamadazrihanifmohdaziz72015 жыл бұрын
Using sigma 30mm f1.4 on my sony a6000 and very happy with it 👍
@sixra5 жыл бұрын
is the sigma 30mm worth it?
@muhamadazrihanifmohdaziz72015 жыл бұрын
@@sixra yes its worth it for myself and the kind of photos that i like to take
@cesarm61315 жыл бұрын
5:24 they do that because the number printed on the lens is actually the exact value and the "true focal length". And not when you multiply it .
@Baiikir5 жыл бұрын
Did the same mistake so i bought sigma 17-50 f/2.8 and it was my best APSC lense. :)
@rsmith025 жыл бұрын
Still a great lens! I use it adapted with my Sony a6500, as no e-mount equivalent exists.
@Baiikir5 жыл бұрын
@@rsmith02 I will try it with Viltrox speedbooster on EOS M50
@ge484215 жыл бұрын
I find myself going back to using a 35mm equivalent lens (that would be 23mm on an APS-C camera) for documentary images. Anything wider starts showing distortion, especially in faces near the edge of the image, and anything longer does not always let you get close enough. If I carry one lens it’s that one, not a 50mm.
@THEMATT2225 жыл бұрын
Hey, do you have a spare potato jet's autograph?
@lensofeli17623 жыл бұрын
when he said “who needs gir-“ and the gear flew across the room 🤣🤣i lost it
@stampydragon2739 Жыл бұрын
And i use m42 vintage lenses up to 135mm prime
@flightographist10 ай бұрын
I use my sweet helios 44-2 as a 75 portrait.
@rjnakamura13854 жыл бұрын
damn the feels, i can relate you should've made this video 4 years ago lol
@johnmcard31164 жыл бұрын
He shouldn't have made it at all. Totally inaccurate information.. No mention of the fact that you buy lenses made FOR cropped sensors, and their focal lengths will be true.
@archixemilaedventures43114 жыл бұрын
Just bought my 50 mm lens for my APS-c Cam. lol Haay. Now I understand. But I will just be steps further to use my lens.
@Gadgets205 жыл бұрын
I came to a lot of these came conclusions when I started doing photography 😅. One thing to note is the crop factor on Canon is actually 1.6. On Sony it's 1.5. However if you're using a Micro 4/3s system, it's a 2x crop. Also the Canon M50 w/ the 50mm on a speed booster is pretty sweet. It gives you an equivalent focal length of 57mm.
@johnmcard31164 жыл бұрын
He doesn't even mention that if you buy a cropped-sensor specific lens, the focal length it is rated for will be true. Only when you put a full-frame lens on a cropped sensor will the issues arise.
@professionalpotato47644 жыл бұрын
@@johnmcard3116 Nope. Focal length is a physical spec of the lens. And it's a measurement of how the light is being bent to be focused. A cropped sensor lens has the exact same focal length as a full frame version if they have the same numbers. A 50mm FF lens on FF body has the same 50mm focal length of a APS-C lens on APS-C body. . The thing that changes is the field of view. The optics behave the same. Field of view is cropped as long as you're not on full frame, so just multiply it. APS-C lenses are just made smaller so there's no light "wastage", but the field of view is still effectively cropped. That is why crop sensor kit lenses have a different range (18-55), so that it provides approximately the same field of view (after the crop factor)as a 24-70 kit lens on a FF body. Check out Gerald Undone's video on crop sensors.
@Onenamemedia24 жыл бұрын
i loved the 50mm for my sony. I got the 18-105 G f4 now, love it more because of range. But when i shoot inside, without alot of light it looks alot worse.
@divil22734 жыл бұрын
How is it? I want to buy the simular 28-135
@Onenamemedia24 жыл бұрын
@@divil2273 28-135 or 18-135? . The 18-135 comes with less quality, both image and build.
@divil22734 жыл бұрын
@@Onenamemedia2 no the 28-135 f4. The cinema lens
@Onenamemedia24 жыл бұрын
@@divil2273 oke, dont know that one, never used it. Let me know if its a good one👌
@edwardv3655 жыл бұрын
i just ordered the 50mm f/1.8 for my 200d and its on its way lol, no going back now
@phoenixrising44645 жыл бұрын
I have the same setup and love it,
@glennurquhart29894 жыл бұрын
Being on a budget, I got the Canon 50mm f/1.8 and the Canon 24mm f/1.8 for my Canon T7i. Love these prime lens!
@kaiateya3 ай бұрын
I ran into this recently, too, on an APS-C camera. Everyone said nifty fifty, nifty fifty was actually pretty cheap, so I got one. Stunning, stunning bokeh and pretty good for tripod low light / long exposures / etc. It's been changing my game for doing IR photography without a sensor filter conversion, because of the huge light influx. But yeah, I was really stumped as to why it felt like I was always zoomed in; why is everyone going nuts over this thing? Every time I went out with it, it eventually ended up in my bag and stayed there, because it's too shaky (no IS) for macro-ish shots, and it was too close in for everything else. But yeah, now it makes a lot more sense. 35mm equivalents of the same lens are ridiculously expensive in comparison, so... back to the kit lens for now. :D It's actually not bad! Just sort of a bard lens though, Jack of all trades, master of none... Edit: Forgot to say, my spouse calls this lens my "nifty eighty" now... lol.
@Mrgunsngear5 жыл бұрын
great info
@directorxj50934 жыл бұрын
video starts at 4:16
@joshblank15 жыл бұрын
What is obsession with wider angle lenses. I love the crop / zoomed in portraits (shoulders and higher). Tack sharp eye AF and bokeh. Less distortion
@RayValdezPhotography5 жыл бұрын
probably not that useful for video unless u have like a team or doing films and have a lot of time to change lenses for framing.
@pisangijo4195 жыл бұрын
Why? To capture both the object and the "instagramable" environment of course, lol.
@gmcubed4 жыл бұрын
Paul Blank wider lenses are closer to how we see the world, so we're not as taken aback when we realize we're too close to get what we want in frame. It's also not long enough in situations where you'd reach for a zoom. I only use my 50 when I have no other choice due to low light. 50 can be great if you have the time and space to experiment, but if your subjects are people they probably aren't patient enough. I havnt used one on a full frame though.
@lomelyo6 ай бұрын
You can't get a 50mm look with a 35mm lens is literally physically impossible. 50mm gives you the 50mm look regardless of sensor size. Tbis is a FACT. If you want to talk about how the crop is unusable sure. But otherwise this post is ignorant and you really should take it down adter this many years
@charlien41535 жыл бұрын
50 is a horrible recommendation for many. Recommendation needs to be on FOV
@MasterVycen5 жыл бұрын
Holy Shit I'm so sorry but I literally thought Potato Jet and Jason Vong were the same person and just had an apocalyptic inception moment where I realized you are two different people. The resemblance is insane on so many levels!
@KeonHector5 жыл бұрын
Lmao 30 seconds in the video and I'm already laughing
@JasonVong5 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@BlackapinoTheTechGuy5 жыл бұрын
I Just bought the Lumix G7 with the Kit lens 14-42mm , and then I bought a 25mm Lens for Blur in the Background AND...then I bought the 45-150mm Lens, so THAT's pretty much all the lenses I own. These are what I use for my Videotography.
@asura49384 жыл бұрын
So true, wish I had seen this earlier...
@MikeLikesChannel3 жыл бұрын
Best thing I've told newbies getting a crop camera is to start with a 24mm or 35mm lens. Crop factor is never well understood by those starting out (including some pros). 50mm crop lenses are not a smartphone PoV, and as such, not beginner friendly. 50mm lenses make perfect sense... if your camera is full-frame. Unlikely with a newbie looking for budget cameras.
@mattmarusic46365 жыл бұрын
Dudeeee finallyyy a newwwwww videoooo
@JasonVong5 жыл бұрын
been cooking up other videos! higher production, they're coming soon!
@mattmarusic46365 жыл бұрын
Jason Vong can’t wait!! Btw, you are my favorite youtuber (who cares about Potato Jet).
@thekid99893 жыл бұрын
Here's a really big rabbit hole, I am a travel photographer who uses a 75mm (150mm) on a Micro four/thirds. I will also add that I also cary a 17mm (34mm) for some wide angle shots. On top of that I am buying a full frame because I am starting to do more portraits locally.
@platinumacer81195 жыл бұрын
This video was so helpful in recommending good lenses. I feel like I say this every video but it was amazing as usual!
@michaelpablo3725 жыл бұрын
which lens should I buy next for video work. I have 16mm 1.4 56mm or 30mm? Thanks!
@Alex_Ochoa5 жыл бұрын
Depends on what you're shooting,I think both of those are great for b roll type of shots, and even interview type of videos. Only thing is when it comes to video work if you are using a mic mounted on the camera or getting audio in camera as well from your subject you might be a little too far from them , unless you use a lav . Ultimately comes down to what you're filming
@Milan-cf1xe5 жыл бұрын
Finally one talking about that. I made the same mistake
@doublahh4 жыл бұрын
I own the Sigma 30mm 1.4 and it's become my go to lens for my Canon 80D. Sadly my "Nifty fifty" has become the redheaded stepchild that's been ignored and soon will start to worry because it's taking up space at the orphanage. Lol
@MrAlfredkwok5 жыл бұрын
It really depends on what type of photography you are in when choosing the next lens, and man this is a really good guide
@JasonVong5 жыл бұрын
glad this looks solid!
@erumc58398 ай бұрын
hello beginner here! i have an a6400 with a sigma 30mm 1.4 i want for portraits like cosplay photos and street night photos... did i do a nice buy? i mean can i use only that lens for those two? thanks for reading and sorry for my english isnt my principal language thanks!
@carlneraphoto5 жыл бұрын
I’d love to see more tutorials on portrait photography! 😁😁 I Love the 50mm focal length, perfect for portraits. But I really agree that 50mm is too tight, so 35mm or 24mm is good for all around.
@JeremyCWW4 жыл бұрын
For apsc?
@cfsitalisay33124 жыл бұрын
@@JeremyCWW yes!
@AliRastafa2 жыл бұрын
Nope, definately you are not right. Take a portrait photo with 24/35 and compare it to 50/85.
@ArianOby4 жыл бұрын
What d heck🙄🙄🙄! ... first of all .... I was like I thought I already subscribed to @potatoejet ... then realised you arent him ... ... secondly .... the resemblance is uncanny ... I subscribed to you after watching this ... Ever considered being a stunt double for @potatoejet?? Lol👍👍👍
@villashartvig76995 жыл бұрын
I would love to see a astrophotography video from you, or a collaboration with Sony ambassador Kyle Meyr, and see you take photos together.
@htc1484 жыл бұрын
"dont worry about being too close to your object" *filming girl* 🤣🤣 jk
@BrianTheCameraGuy5 жыл бұрын
OMG I thought the same thing. I was originally going to get the a7iii bit ended up getting the a6400. You are totally right it feels really close.
@BrianTheCameraGuy5 жыл бұрын
@S Tra Would have loved a Porsche but I would take a Honda Civic. This stuff is expensive man. No need to put yourself in financial ruin over it.
@simrankhurana43964 жыл бұрын
@S Tra ultimately the full frame is ridiculously expensive due to the kens
@johnnerdelbaumfrink26573 жыл бұрын
Although I also think a 35mm lens is a better choice for an APS-C sensor, a 50mm will always have a focal length of 50mm... no matter what sensor size you're using (MFT, APS-C, full frame, medium format). It's a lens with a given focal length and the size of the sensor can't change its optical output. A 35mm lens on an APS-C sensor is not equivalent to a 52mm lens on a full frame. They will only have the same angle of view, and that's it.
@Elaba835 жыл бұрын
There's also a thing like speedboosters for removing that crop factor (when using vintage FF lenses)
@craigskoney16274 жыл бұрын
50 mm on a 1.5 crop sensor IS NOT 75 mm; it's 50 mm CROPPED IN to the same FIELD OF VIEW as a 75 mm . 50 mm is always 50 mm. You have to step back further to frame the shot so it's the same as on a full frame camera, because of the crop. The magnification /reach doesn't change. The whole equivalence thing needs to end.
@ostettivictor4 жыл бұрын
My second job is a landscape/cityscape photographer, and i use a lot 10-18mm lens on my a6000, until i discover the 70-200 and 100-400, they are WAY BETTER lenses for landscape, for panoramas, giving me more resolution, compression, and moreemphasis on my subjetcs, making my composition a WAY MORE EASY
@Anarki2U4 жыл бұрын
It would be much easier if lenses was informed with their diagonal angle of view in degrees, in that way you can always compare all cameras no matter what size of the sensor (exect for DOF). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_of_view I will prefer a 85mm on a 24x36mm("fullframe") camera, the DOF are shallower and much more pleasing than a 55mm on a APSC camera. That said I use a 135mm on A7R4 ;)
@andrewtongue70844 жыл бұрын
This is complete balls, Jason - the photographer utilises the equipent they have, & adapts accordingly - there's no such 'perfect' lens, & in truth, unless you have a limitless budget, most photographers starting out will purchase a crop frame DSLR - the "1.5" factor is easily calculated....the rest is moot information, my friend; but you're entertaining, so that's a plus. Happy New Year (including the upcoming Chinese New Year) !! :D
@BenelliMr5 жыл бұрын
you did everything wrong this time: you want IS? Buy a camera with IS. You want a 50mm? Everybody recommended a 50 mm equivalent to you. You had a 50 on APSC? What a cheap way to get a portrait lens!!! A 50 mm (equivalent) forces you to zoom with the feet, not the fingers. But then in 90% of all cases you got the better perspective for a better photo. You don't believe me? Go back to basics; borrow a 4*5 inch camera and get the fundamentals of photography right. Then get (rent/borrow) a 8*10 inch camera and reiterate the lessons of Ansel Adams. Then get a small Rollei or Minox camera with 35 mmm equivalent and do street photography. Like Henri Cartier-Bresson. Then go back to your digital cameras and give your 50 mm (equivalent) a second chance. I can predict the future: your photos will be so much better. And don't forget the basic lesson of optics: the smaller the lens, the less you have to correct. Try this out also at night. Or sunsets. Or other difficult lighting conditions. And: most important: when you get a great photo with a prime lens, you feel such a psychological satisfaction. You could never get this satisfaction with a 10-1000 mm 1.0 zoom lens, sitting on a chair and zooming around until you got a good photo by hazard.
@markangelodickenson67735 жыл бұрын
Hi Jason. Big fan of your channel here. hey i just want your expert opinion. I am new to photography and want to go being a wedding photographer, I have a Sony A7ii as of now and I have a Tamron 28-75 f2.8. I just want to ask which lens should i buy next. I am considering the Sony 85mm 1.8 or the wide angle 16-35mm f4. Which one would you recommend? Also i want to do some food and real state photography. Please help me.
@ThierryWasserman4 жыл бұрын
Watching this after the video where he highly recommends a 85mm lens is confusing. The 50mm is an 80mm on a canon APSC.
@jordanjoestar88394 жыл бұрын
My first lens was a 50.. 1.8f on a Sony A6000 and many people give me the "woah what did you shoot that on?". The answer is always 50mm. Matches the attitude and vibe of whatever im shooting. People over think it. Aim the camera. Does it look good? Yes/No. That is the only metric you should go by. Numbers and sensor mathematics are not what determine a GOOD photo. Use what you need to recreate what your brain is seeing/envisioning. Yes it helps knowing the math behind what you're grabbing, but don't write it off because of a factor you can adjust too, and often succeed with.
@renanrossidias3 жыл бұрын
Basically, the reason why i don't get a full-frame camera is the very same reason you don't get a Lambo. Liked how Jason convinced me to buy a 50mm lens to my APS-C on a "Why I Don't Recommend 50mm Lens" video.
@JJohnson3135 жыл бұрын
No. They recommend the nifty 50 because it’s literally a better lens than the kit lens. It’s sharper and let’s in more light. Also, if you’re doing a portrait then you wanna use a “85” and it’s close to that.
@Mikri904 жыл бұрын
I know you are simplifying for the sake of not confusing your audience, but I will indulge myself and be overly pedantic for a moment. "50mm on a FF is a 50mm".... Correct, but 50mm is 50mm on ANY format, it's just that the 35mm became the reference point for evaluating most other formats. A 50mm lens still retains it's properties even on a smaller format, it's just that the smaller surface area crops in the image. The lens still behaves the same, it just has a narrower field of view. I am saying this because I noticed a lot of people think that the lens actually changes its characteristics and that it becomes equivalent to a 75/1.8 lens which is only partially accurate. It is only an equivalent field of view (FOV), but a 50mm on APS-C would be equivalent to something like a 75/2.8, because you also have to account the smaller pupil size (aperture opening, which is larger in absolute terms on a longer lens) which is smaller, so you have to account for that. True equivalence therefore also takes aperture into account. Same applies in the other direction. 50mm on a larger format will give a wider field of view but also a larger lens opening compared to a wider lens on FF that has the same FOV and the same relative aperture. All of this is, of course, because the f/stop is just a relative number, it's a ratio between the focal length and the actual opening in absolute terms. If we compare different focal lengths with the same aperture, let's say 50/1.8 on APS-C and some imaginary 75/1.8 on FF, and take into account the difference between the absolute sizes of lens apertures, it becomes clear that to have fully equivalent lenses in terms of the look they output, the shorter lens has to have larger relative aperture to equalize the difference and have the same absolute size of the lens opening.
@okaro659511 ай бұрын
No, the true focal length is always what is printed on the lens. The sensor does not change the focal length. The 59 mm just behaves differently on a crop sensor as it crops the edges.
@kiyoshim95934 жыл бұрын
you are misleading people thats why you have so many dislikes in this video. you have to check lens specification PERIOD. check "Angle of view" For Example Sony 50mm E, Nikon 35mm are thevsame but Sigma 50mm E is not. at the end "check lens specifications" thats why they have it there
@Anarki2U4 жыл бұрын
That are so wrong, on a APSC sensor camera a 50mm makes sense ! 50mm on APSC equals a 75mm on "fullfomat" 24x36 sensor camera and gives an exellent allround lens. Opposite the 50mm gives NO sense what so ever on a 24x36 sensor camera, everything shorter or longer as a 50mm makes much more sens on the "fullformat" 24x36 sensor camera, so at least 45mm or shorter lens and at least 55mm or longer lens !!!
@CamaradaMejia5 жыл бұрын
I know you were likely trying to keep it simple, but technically a 50mm is a 50mm on any camera. Your FOV changes of course, but the focal length is still 50mm. Using a 35mm on a crop sensor will get you 50mm FOV, but you'll still have 35mm distortion and compression. A 50mm on a crop will get you a 75mm FOV but you'll still get the 50mm compression. You're just taking a smaller section of the image circle and blowing it up larger.